Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation’s Premier12 championship is a wonderful moment for the country and a reminder of the power of sports to bring people together and instill public pride in the nation.
Taiwan is in a golden age of soft power and international visibility. Taiwan’s baseball heroes joining the nation’s democracy and LGBTQ+ rights movements, former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) internationally renowned leadership and now diplomatic role, the nation’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, its semiconductor and advanced technology industries, and Nymphia Wind (妮妃雅), the pride of Taiwan’s queer community, who won US reality show RuPaul’s Drag Race in April, are all manifesting Taiwan’s spirit and values on the world stage.
It is a reminder that when Taiwan is given an opportunity to express itself, it makes a warm and positive contribution to the world.
Baseball is one of the few things that can unite Taiwanese across the political divide, allowing people to find common ground in support of a shared passion. However, while the whole nation came together in supporting the team, the messages of congratulations from politicians — “Team Taiwan” or “Team Chinese Taipei” — brought to the fore hidden fractures, revealing the polarized national vision of the two sides.
Introduced to Taiwan by Japan during the colonial era, the sport was strategically embraced by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) as a vehicle to promote its version of Chinese nationalism. Taiwan’s domination of Little League Baseball — winning 17 championships in less than 30 years from the 1960s through the 1990s — was linked to strong interventions by the KMT, which helped the regime maintain its ideological legitimacy at home and abroad as the “real China,” Fu Jen Catholic University adjunct assistant professor of sociology Daniel Yu-Kuei Sun (孫又揆) wrote on the topic.
However, with democratization in the 1990s and the KMT no longer the only powerful party, the meaning of the sport has changed, and it is now an important symbol of Taiwanese identity. In recent years, “Team Taiwan” has become the go-to phrase for Taiwanese to support their team in international competitions, a symbolic assertion of identity against the “Chinese Taipei” strictures imposed by geopolitical attempts to sideline the nation.
However, despite the ideology of Chinese nationalism giving way to a Taiwanese identity in the public sphere, KMT politicians are still wedded to that earlier ideology. In sending their congratulations to the team after their victory, Democratic Progressive Party politicians used the term “Team Taiwan,” while KMT mayors, lawmakers and mainstream politicians used the term “Chinese Taipei,” drawing mockery online.
This usage has not only brought to the fore the nation’s political fractures, but also brought into sharp relief the KMT’s modern identity crisis in clinging to an outdated China ideology that views Taiwan as a part of a larger Chinese whole, while seeking to govern a Taiwanese electorate that views their nation as independent.
However, one leading KMT politician did use “Team Taiwan” in his message of congratulations — Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) — suggesting that he has his sights set on a higher political office. In democratic Taiwan, KMT politicians have had to show flexibility to stay electorally competitive, with ambitious political entrepreneurs de-emphasizing their China ideology while burnishing their Taiwanese bona fides when seeking to be elected president. That includes, among others, “new Taiwanese” former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), also a former Taipei mayor.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
Beijing’s diplomatic tightening with Jakarta is not an isolated episode; it is a piece of a long-term strategy that realigns the prices of choices across the Indo-Pacific. The principle is simple. There is no need to impose an alliance if one can make a given trajectory convenient and the alternative costly. By tying Indonesia’s modernization to capital, technology and logistics corridors, and by obtaining in public the reaffirmation of the “one China” principle, Beijing builds a constraint that can be activated tomorrow on sensitive issues. The most sensitive is Taiwan. If we look at systemic constraints, the question is not whether