Sistema Compartit a l'ICOLC

Editor's Notes

1. Maurice B. Line “Co-operation: the triumph of hope over experience?”,.
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCLC Bearing the Cost[edit] The cost of implementing OCLC in the late 1960s was extraordinarily high by today's standards. Computers cost millions of dollars and software was measured in KLOCS (thousands of lines of code). No history is complete without an explanation of from where this money came. At the time, university libraries around the country were constructing central libraries and shutting down their branch libraries—mathematics, biology, etc. The Ohio State University had an unusually large collection, spread out over a very large campus (there are currently 27 branch libraries), and an outside consulting company was hired to compare the cost of building a central library to creating an online catalog, which would alleviate the need for a central library (and make some of the faculty happier.) The consulting company's report said that the costs would be more or less the same, but that an online catalog offered the possibility of selling that service to other libraries for profit, and so the decision to create OCLC was made. The consulting company had in mind a commercial venture, and this may even have briefly happened for out-of-State libraries. The OCLC idea was already being tossed around, but this gave the State of Ohio the necessary funding justification.
3. 3.1 CCUC El CCUC proporciona uns beneficis de 3.310.281,00 €. Aquests provenen de considerar quin seria el cost de catalogar els documents que actualment cataloguen les biblioteques del CBUC si no poguessin copiar registres tal com els permet fer-ho el CCUC. De les dades de catalogació per còpia es considera que un 30% serien igualment catalogacions per còpia sense el CCUC. Es considera que la diferència entre les catalogacions que es fan i aquest 30% són les catalogacions per còpia que facilita el CCUC.
4. The genre of web-scale discovery services has seen vigorous development and competition since about 2009. These products rely on a massive centralized index populated by the universe of content products to which libraries subscribe, open access materials, and local resources such as those managed through its ILS. Major products include ProQuest Summon, Primo and Primo Central from Ex Libris, EBSCO Discovery Service, and OCLC’s WorldCat Local. Library Systems Report 2014 Posted Tuesday, April 15, 2014 - 20:13 Competition and strategic cooperation By Marshall Breeding http://www.americanlibrariesmagazine.org/article/library-systems-report-2014
5. But search has moved to the network level, and whether it is through Google’s Search, Scholar, or Books services, Wikipedia, or a variety of other tools, a higher share of academic discovery than ever before is routed around, rather than through, the library. Does discovery still happen In the library? : roles and strategies for a shifting reality / Roger C. Schonfeld // Ithaka S + R, 2014 A recent survey of teachers and researchers from the universities of Catalonia showed that half of the respondents went first to a specialized database to start a literature search; the second option was Internet search engines (30%), followed by the library catalogue (17%) and the option of physically visiting the library, a residual 3% (Borrego, 2014).
6. Taula 11. Fonts emprades per consultar un document per al qual ja es disposa d’una referència Respostes % Al catàleg o pàgina web de la biblioteca 915 40,0 A una base de dades especialitzada (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, etc.) 757 34,1 A un motor de cerca a Internet (Bing, Google, Yahoo, etc.) 578 21,2 Altres 64 2,8 Aquests resultats són coincidents amb els registrats als Estats Units, amb percentatges idèntics d’utilització del catàleg i, a l’inrevés del que ocorria a la pregunta anterior, una menor preferència per les bases de dades bibliogràfiques en benefici d’una utilització lleugerament superior dels motors de cerca. Al Regne Unit s’observa que el recurs més utilitzat són les bases de dades especialitzades, per sobre del catàleg de la biblioteca, mentre que els motors de cerca tenen un percentatge d’adeptes idèntic a l’observat a Catalunya.
7. Dempsey, Lorcan, Constance Malpas, and Brian Lavoie. 2014. "Collection Directions: The Evolution of Library Collections and Collecting" portal: Libraries and the Academy 14,3 (July): 393-423. The evolving scholarly record: Libraries acquire, organize, and provide stewardship of the scholarly record. Ongoing redefinition of the scholarly record will drive changes in library and publishing practice. You need resources to create new services The inside-out collection: The dominant library model has been outside-in, where materials are purchased or licensed from external sources and made available to a local audience. The inside-out model, where institutional materials (digitized special collections, research and learning materials, researcher expertise profiles, etc.) are shared with an external audience requires new ways of thinking. You need to push your data out Sourcing and scaling: Collections will be managed at several levels, above the institution as well as within it. Choices about the optimum level (institutional, consortial/group, regional, global) for management are becoming more common, as are decisions about how to source activities (collaborative, buy from third party, etc.). You need resources from others Noves possibilitats Lsp Dt Noves necessitats Menys cost Alliberar recursos Dedicar-se a dades i no a gestionar dades Reptes futur Col·leccions especials Cua llarga per a paper Informar de dades pròpies Suport recerca
8. online and through improved instructional offerings. But search has moved to the network level, and whether it is through Google’s Search, Scholar, or Books services, Wikipedia, or a variety of other tools, a higher share of academic discovery than ever before is routed around, rather than through, the library.
9. New system provides access to collections of 14 academic libraries in Montana through one search September 24, 2014 -- MSU News Service http://www.montana.edu/news/15107/new-system-provides-access-to-collections-of-14-academic-libraries-in-montana-through-one-search
10. Lizanne Payne / Winning the Space Race: Expanding collections and services with shared depositories // American libràries, Posted Tuesday, September 23, 2014 - 16:00 http://www.americanlibrariesmagazine.org/article/winning-space-race Understanding the Collective Collection: Towards a System-wide Perspective on Library Print Collections / An OCLC Research Report by: Lorcan Dempsey, Brian Lavoie, Constance Malpas, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Roger C. Schonfeld, JD Shipengrover, and Günter Waibel With an introduction by Lorcan Dempsey, The Emergence of the Collective Collection: Analyzing Aggregate Print Library Holdings Key highlights: Interest in shared print strategies has had several drivers: Google Books; the digital turn: changing patterns of research and learning; the opportunity costs of current use of space; efficient access to materials; and a general move to collaboration. The network turn is leading to changes in the focus, boundaries and value of library collections. Libraries and the organizations that provide services to them are devoting more attention to system-wide organization of collections—whether the "system" is a consortium, a region or a country. Libraries are beginning to evolve arrangements that facilitate long-term shared management of the print literature as individual libraries begin to manage down their local capacity. A system-wide perspective signals a real shift in emphasis. A range of first-ever calculations providing quantitative estimates and analyses of the system-wide collection. For example, ". . . given any two Google 5 libraries—or, if the Google 5 results can be extrapolated to a larger context, given any two large research libraries—eight out of ten books in their combined collections will be unique." (p. 43) ". . . post-1923 materials collectively account for more than 80 percent, or about 12.6 million, of the US-published print books in WorldCat." (p. 73) "If the current growth trajectory of the HathiTrust Digital Library is sustained, we can project that more than 60% of the retrospective print collections held in ARL libraries will be duplicated in the shared digital repository by June 2014." (p. 80) For ARL libraries, cost avoidance of $500,000 to $2 million per year and space savings of more than 45,000 assignable square feet could be achieved through shared print provision. (p. 81)
11. CollectionDirections: Towards the collective (print) collection
12. Maurice B. Line “Co-operation: the triumph of hope over experience?”,.
13. [email protected] @lluisanglada