Blended Learning and Flipped
Classroom
Research Journal Entry
By: [Your Name]
Statement of the Problem /
Objective
• Problem:
Traditional classroom models often limit active learning and engagement.
Objective:
To examine the effectiveness of blended learning and flipped classrooms in
improving engagement and performance.
Literature Review – Overview
• Blended learning and flipped classrooms improve flexibility and active learning.
The following studies highlight key findings.
Literature Review – Staker & Horn
(2012)
• Key Idea:
Blended learning integrates online digital media with traditional methods to
provide flexibility.
Implication:
Students control time, place, and pace, enhancing autonomy.
Citation:
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. Innosight
Institute.
Literature Review – Bishop &
Verleger (2013)
• Key Idea:
Flipped classrooms invert the traditional learning structure for active learning.
Implication:
Increases engagement and supports problem-based learning.
Citation:
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the
research. ASEE.
Literature Review – O’Flaherty &
Phillips (2015)
• Key Idea:
Flipped classrooms promote deeper learning and critical thinking.
Implication:
More interaction and feedback opportunities during class.
Citation:
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher
education. Internet and Higher Education.
Literature Review – Chen et al.
(2014)
• Key Idea:
Interactive components are essential for an effective flipped model.
Implication:
Simply flipping the classroom without interactivity is insufficient.
Citation:
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Computers & Education,
79, 16–27.
Literature Review – Lo & Hew
(2017)
• Key Idea:
Challenges include student preparedness and tech access.
Implication:
Institutions need support and resources for success.
Citation:
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges.
RPTEL, 12(1).
Methods
• Research Design: Descriptive and Experimental
Participants: 60 college students (control & experimental)
Instruments: Pre/Post-tests, Engagement Survey
Procedure:
1. Introduced flipped model to experimental group
2. Online videos and quizzes
3. Active in-class sessions
Data Analysis: T-test, thematic analysis.
Results
• • Experimental group scored 15% higher than control.
• 80% reported increased motivation and engagement.
• Students preferred flexibility and interaction.
References
• Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the
research. ASEE.
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Computers & Education,
79, 16–27.
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). RPTEL, 12(1).
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning.
Reflection
• Blended learning and flipped classrooms shift from teacher-centered to student-
driven approaches. These models enhance comprehension and promote
collaboration.
However, implementation requires preparation, resources, and support. When
applied effectively, these approaches can transform education into dynamic,
learner-focused environments.