Econ - Unit - 2 - Consumer Demand Theory
Econ - Unit - 2 - Consumer Demand Theory
Econ - Unit - 2 - Consumer Demand Theory
2
UTILITY CONT.
There are two views of utility:
Cardinal Utility (Jevons, Walras, and Marshall)
Cardinal utility is the belief that utility can be measured and compared
on a unit by unit basis.
measurement units utils
3
CARDINAL UTILITY
Assumptions:
4
TOTAL UTILITY AND MARGINAL
UTILITY
5
UTILITY
6
LAW OF DIMINISHING MARGINAL UTILITY
Though wants of an individual are unlimited in number yet each
individual want is satiable. Because of this, the more we have a
commodity, the less we want to have more of it.
7
LAW OF DIMINISHING MARGINAL
UTILITY
8
LAW OF DIMINISHING MARGINAL
UTILITY
Example
9
LAW OF DIMINISHING MARGINAL
UTILITY
Explanation:
As more and more quantity of a commodity is consumed, the
intensity if desire decreases and also the utility derived from the
additional unit.
Assumptions:
All the units of a commodity must be same in all respects
The unit of the good must be standard
There should be no change in taste during the process of
consumption
There must be continuity in consumption
There should be no change in the price of the substitute goods
10
LAW OF DIMINISHING MARGINAL
UTILITY
Total Utility
30
(1) (2) (3)
0 0
] 10 10
1 10
] 8
2 18
] 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
3 24 Units Consumed Per Meal
] 4
6 30
] 0 8
6
7 28
] -2 4
2
0
-2 MU
11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Units Consumed Per Meal
UTILITY
-- ICE CREAM
CONSUMPTION
1 2 3 4 5 6
Ice Cream Cones per Week
2. is called the marginal utility 3. Marginal utility falls
Utils of an additional cone. as more cones are
30
20 consumed.
10
Marginal Utility
1 2 3 4 5 6
Ice Cream Cones per Week
13
LAW OF DIMINISHING MARGINAL
UTILITY
Exceptions:
# Money
# Hobbies and Rare Things
# Liquor and Music
# Things of Display
Importance:
Basis of Law of Demand
Basis of Consumption Expenditure
14
The basis of Progressive Taxation
LAW OF EQUI-MARGINAL UTILITY
This law states that the consumer maximizing his total utility will
allocate his income among various commodities in such a way that his
marginal utility of the last rupee spent on each commodity is equal.
Or
The consumer will spend his money income on different goods in such
a way that marginal utility of each good is proportional to its price
Or
Under cardinal utility analysis a consumer maximizes his total utility
by equalizing his marginal utility in relation to price in all the
directions of his consumption or on each good and service purchased
by him.
15
UTILITY MAXIMIZATION WITH
SCARCITY
Now suppose we focus on how a consumer chooses when
goods are not free the issue becomes one of
maximizing utility subject to the constraint that your
income is limited and prices are greater than zero
Suppose we now extend our analysis to the consumption
of two goods: pizza and video rentals
Suppose we have the following information:
The price of pizza is $8
The rental price of a movie video is $4
After tax income equals $40 per week
16
CONSUMER
EQUILIBRIUM
Consumer equilibrium is achieved when the
budget is completely spent and the last dollar
spent on each good yields the same additional
utility
MUp MUv
Pp Pv
Where MUp is the marginal utility of pizza, pp is
the price of pizza, MUv is the marginal utility of
videos, and pv is the price of videos
17
Example 2
Given the budget constraint, Individuals will attempt to
gain the maximum utility for each additional dollar spent,
“the marginal dollar.”
For PX = $3, the
MUX
Utility X MUX per dollar MUY Utility Y
PX PY
Qx TUx MUx spent on good Qy TUy MUy
X is;
1 30 30 10. 12 1 60 60
2 55 25 8.33 6 2 90 30
For PY = $5, the
3 75 20 6.67 MU per dollar 4 3 110 20
Y
4 90 15 5.00 spent on good 2 4 120 10
5 100 10 3.33 Y is; 1.6 5 128 8
6 105 5 1.67 0 6 128 0
7 105 0 0 7 120 -8
8 100 -5 8 100 - Slide
20
-- 18
Now the preferences of the individuals and the relative prices
of the two goods are displayed in the tables.
MUX
PX
< MU
PY
Y indicates that the MU per dollar spent on good
Y exceeds that of a dollar spent on good X.
MUX
PX
< MU
P
Y says to purchase less X to pay for additional
Y
amounts of Y.
MUX MUY
PX = PY
is an equilibrium condition!
21
MUX MUY
PX = PY
subject to the constraint:
PX X + PY Y = B
23
ORDINAL VS CARDINAL RANKINGS
Ordinal Ranking: gives us information on how a
consumer ranks different baskets of goods. But it does not
say by how much (i.e. 2 times as much)
This is how we view preferences.
Cardinal Rankings: Give us information on the intensity
of the consumer preferences (i.e. they like basket A 10
times more than basket B).
Would be hard to say I like eating pizza out 10.5 times more than
eating bad Chinese. Putting an exact number to our preferences is
hard! – this is why we use ordinal rankings for consumer
preferences
24
ORDINAL VS CARDINAL EXAMPLE
Students take an exam. After the exam, the students are ranked
according to their performance. An ordinal ranking lists the
students in order of their performance (i.e., Harry did best, Joe
did second best, Betty did third best, and so on).
A cardinal ranking gives the grade of the exam, based on an
absolute grading standard (i.e., Harry got 50, Joe got 100, so
Joe did 2 times better than Harry).
25
CONSUMER PREFERENCES
Indifference Curves
● indifference curve Curve representing all combinations of market
baskets that provide a consumer with the same level of satisfaction.
An Indifference Curve
26
CONSUMER PREFERENCES
Indifference Maps
● indifference map Graph containing a set of indifference curves
showing the market baskets among which a consumer is indifferent.
An Indifference Map
27
CONSUMER PREFERENCES
Indifference Maps
28
CONSUMER PREFERENCES
31
CONSUMER PREFERENCES
In (a), Bob views orange juice and In (b), Jane views left shoes and
apple juice as perfect substitutes: right shoes as perfect complements:
He is always indifferent between a An additional left shoe gives her no
glass of one and a glass of the extra satisfaction unless she also 32
other. obtains the matching right shoe.
INDIFFERENCE CURVE ANALYSIS
BudgetLine (Constraint)
Income Changes
Price Changes
12
10
Quantity of A
8 (Unattainable)
6
2 (Attainable)
0
2 4 6 8 10 12
Quantity of B 33
INDIFFERENCE CURVE ANALYSIS
What is Preferred
Down sloping
Convex to Origin
Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS)
12
j
Combination Units of A Units of B 10
Quantity of A
8
j 12 2
6 k
k 6 4
l
4 m
l 4 6
2 I
m 3 8
0
2 4 6 8 10 12
Quantity of B 34
INDIFFERENCE CURVE ANALYSIS
The Indifference Map
Equilibrium Position at Tangency
12
10
PB
MRS =
PA
8
Quantity of A
Preferred –
6 W But Requires
More Income
4 X
I4
2 I3
I2
I1
0
2 4 6 8 10 12 35
Quantity of B
DERIVATION OF THE DEMAND CURVE
Measurement of Utility
12
Marginal Utility Marginal Utility
10 of A of B
Quantity of A
8 Price of A = Price of B
6
X
At $1 Price for B,
4
6 Units are Purchased
2
I3 Record the Results
I2
0 As Price of B Increases to
2 4 6 8 10 12
Quantity of B $1.50,
Only 3 Units of B are
Bought Record the Results
Price of B