Desktop Case Study
Desktop Case Study
Desktop Case Study
BY,
AISHWARYA KATAGIGHAN
3PD18AT005
ARYANA LOW COST HOUSING
• Location: 6 kilometers north of Indore city.
• Land area: 220 acres (total)
• Number of plots: 6500
• Architect: B. V. Doshi
CONCEPT
• Slum development project
• Inspiration from existing slum settlements in Indore
THOUGHTS THE ARCHITECT HAS PUT IN PROJECT
• To improve and upgrade the existing slum area
• To provide serviced sites for new housing developments instead of building complete houses.
• To provide for 6,500 residential plots ranging in size from 35m.sq for EWS to 475m.sq for high
income groups
• Create a township with a sense of continuity and fundamental values of security in a good living
environment.
• Achieve a community character by establishing harmony between the built environment and
the people.
• Create a balanced community of various socio-economic groups to evolve a framework
through design.
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE PROJECT
• The site is divided into six parts by the roads •Each part/sector has residential clusters , community,
spaces a set of road networks and services and green spaces.
• A conventional sewage system was developed for the township, the natural slope of the site was in
north west direction
• A cluster of 9 – 10 houses were connected to 1 inspection chamber and 18-20 houses to one septic
tank
• Each house has minimum surface exposure. This reduces the heat gain by the house during the hot
summer.
• The houses are oriented with longer side in north-south axis in order to reduce the solar gain.
• The buildings are close to each they such that they shade the public spaces in between the houses .
N S The streets remain half shaded thus help in reducing the heat gain and provides shaded
community.
• This enabled segregation of pedestrian and vehicular movement, good distribution of built and unbuilt
spaces by promoting interactive land use.
• The service cores are present in between the clusters that can be used for communal activities The
walkways running along the green spaces meet the 4.5m road at the cul de sac square
CONCLUSION
• The road network is hierarchal which helps to divide the sectors more effectively
• The site has public spaces which provides more socio-cultural practices
• There is no intersection of vehicular and pedestrian movement.
• Each plots contains the basic requirements for each family