3.1 Analyzing The LGU Situation

3.

1 Analyzing the LGU Situation:

Local Development Indicators System (LDIs) and
Rationalized Planning Indicators and Data Sets
(RaPIDS)
Day 2
Priscella Mejillano, En.P.

Resource Person
Analyzing the LGU Situation:
LDIS and RaPIDS
Session Objectives
1.To discuss how the LDIS is accomplished and

how it is used as a tool for planning
2. To discuss how CDRA is used in supplying

data for LDIS/RaPIDS
Analyzing the LGU Situation:
LDIS and RaPIDS
CDP+ Process
Mainstreaming CCA-DRRM in CDP
Types of Indicators
Final Indicators – measure the effect of an intervention on individuals’ well-
being. Final indicators may be divided into outcome and impact indicators
 Impact Indicators – measure key dimensions of well-being, e.g.
freedom from hunger, literacy, good health, empowerment, security
 Outcome Indicators – capture access to, use of, or satisfaction with
the services provided or received, e.g. access to clean water,
proportion of mothers availing of family planning clinics, volume and
frequency of letters of complaints, etc.
Examples of
Indicators by Type
Input Output Outcome Impact
Tax on idle Increased o Increased self- Increased level of
lands imposed local reliance index of welfare of residents.
on urban revenues. LGU.
vacant lands.
Increased economic
o More property prosperity of the
owners invest in community.
improving their
land use.
Local Development
Indicators System
Local Development
Indicators System
An intermediate analytical tool that portrays

information using the 5 development sectors
 Social
 Economic
 Infrastructure
 Environment
 Institutional
An analytical tool that portrays information
in 3 dimensions:
1) sectoral
2) temporal and
3) geographical/spatial
LDIS Dimensions
 Ratio
 Proportion
 Percentage
 Average
 Per capita share
RaPIDS-
generated
data
3 “I’s” in
Analysis
Items, Statistics, Indicators
Information
Intelligence
1 F
R
A
I
T NO
M T IO
O RA
N
IN NE
GE Planning Larger Smaller Spatial Units
Sector Indicator Area Spatial A B C D
Unit
Social Population
growth rate
What do 1995 -2000 3.2% 2.8% 2.7 2.0 2.5 3.0
these % % % %
2000 - 2007 3.0% 2.9% 3.0 2.1& 2.5 2.9
figures % % %
mean? Literacy
Rate
2000 95% 87% 98% 90% 88% 92%
2003 97% 88% 95% 92% 89% 94%
Examples of Items, Statistics,
Indicators
Compare data/indicators across two spatial or geographical
units
Planning Larger Smaller Spatial Units
Sector Indicator Area Spatial
Unit A B C D
Social Population 3.2% 2.8% 2.7% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0%

growth rate
Literacy Rate 95% 87% 98% 90% 88% 92%

Compare data/indicators in two points or periods of time
Planning Larger Smaller Spatial Units
Sector Indicator Area Spatial A B C D
Unit
Social Population
growth rate
2000 3.2% 2.8% 2.7% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0%
2003 3.0% 2.9% 3.0% 2.1% 2.5% 2.9%
Literacy Rate
2000 95% 87% 98% 90% 88% 92%
2003 97% 88% 95% 92% 89% 94%
Compare data for study area with known standards or benchmarks-
if not time series or spatial distribution of data is available
Sector Indicator Planning Area Standard/
Benchmark
Social Classroom-Students 1:60 1:40
Ratio
Malnutrition Incidence 7% 0
0 to 5 years old
Crime Rate Index – 5% 8%
Non-Index – 12%
12%
Scenarios: Study area is

1)below,
2)above, or
3)the same as standard or benchmark
2 TR
A CT
I  This entails probing into the causes or
EX NG E explanations behind the observed
L LIG
E
INT NCE conditions.
 It asks the question, “Why?”
 It provides the clue to finding more

fundamental solutions by attacking the
causes rather than the symptoms of the
problems.
2 TR
TING E
AC ENC
EX LLIG
E
INT
Extracting
Intelligence
 Restate the observation either based on statistical
information or derived from map overlay analysis.
 Determine the cause or causes of the observed
condition. If uncertain, formulate hypotheses or
educated guesses to be validated later.
Map overlay process illustrated
 Take any pair of thematic maps, say “Existing Land Use” and
“Erosion Areas” in the same map scale.
 Overlay the two maps and note land uses that are vulnerable to
erosion such as settlements, agricultural crops, etc.
 Measure the area affected, recording the actual location to the

nearest barangay or sitio.
 Present observations in table form.
Generating Information from
Maps
Thematic Map 1
Thematic Map 1
Ex: average distribution
Ex: average distribution
Thematic Map
Thematic Map
of rainfall in an area AA
of rainfall in an area
Overlay
Overlay
Criteria Map 1 Criteria Map A
Criteria Map 1 Criteria Map A
Ex: socio-economic
Ex: socio-economic
characteristics
characteristics
CM 1
CM 1
CM A
CM A
DECISION
DECISIONZONE-
ZONE-
derived
derivedfrom
fromclear
clear
indicators
indicators
Generating Information from Maps
Brief
Thematic Implications
Description Explanations Policy
Maps when
of Conflict for Conflict Options
Overlaid Unresolved
Area
Exploring Implications
It asks the question, “So what?” if no significant

G intervention is made
R IN S
N
3
LO IO  Analysis can be extended further into
XP AT
E LIC determining appropriate policy interventions
M P
I  If negative implications predominate,
then the observed condition can be
SOLUTION
S
regarded as a problem. Formulate
policies that either mitigate the
inconvenience or solve the problem
permanently.
If positive implications predominate,
then the observed condition may be regarded as
a potential.
If negative implications predominate, then

the observed condition can be regarded as a
problem. Formulate policies that either
mitigate the inconvenience or solve the
problem permanently.
Expanded Problem-Solution-Finding Matrix (EPSFM)
Observed Explanations Implications Policy SOLUTIONS

Conditions (Causes) when Options
unresolved
WHAT DO THESE WHY? SO WHAT? WHAT TO

FIGURES MEAN? DO?
1. From the EP
2. Results of
VRG
3. Results of In the next session
CDRA
LDI
LDI System
System
and
and Map CBMS LGPMS Vision-Reality
Vision-Reality
RaPIDS Gap
Gap Analysis
Analysis
RaPIDS Overlays
Observed Conditions
Implications when no Explanations of

intervention is introduced Causative Factors
Policy Options
Goal Statements
Ad Majorem Dei
Gloriam
Maraming Salamat Po
!!!
Pro Deo et Patria

3.1 Analyzing The LGU Situation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

3.1 Analyzing The LGU Situation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

3.1 Analyzing The LGU Situation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

3.

1 Analyzing the LGU Situation:

Priscella Mejillano, En.P.

1.To discuss how the LDIS is accomplished and

2. To discuss how CDRA is used in supplying

An intermediate analytical tool that portrays

Social Population 3.2% 2.8% 2.7% 2.0% 2.5% 3.0%

Literacy Rate 95% 87% 98% 90% 88% 92%

Scenarios: Study area is

 It asks the question, “Why?”

 It provides the clue to finding more

 Measure the area affected, recording the actual location to the

It asks the question, “So what?” if no significant

If negative implications predominate, then

Observed Explanations Implications Policy SOLUTIONS

WHAT DO THESE WHY? SO WHAT? WHAT TO

Implications when no Explanations of

You might also like