Case Study Presentation
Case Study Presentation
LANDSCAPE
ENTRY
MAIN BLOCK
PARKING
ACCESS
CASE STUDY- II
DATE : 18-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 01 PRESTIGE UNIVERSITY 311717251025
OFFICE
LEGEND 5. TOILET
1. ADMINISTRATION AND PLACEMENT OFFICE 6. COUTYARD
2. LIBRARY-INDIVIDUAL STUDY 7. CIRCULATION CORE
3. LIBRARY-GROUP STUDY 8. WEBSEMINAR ROOM
4. CLASSROOM 9. EXECUTIVE CLASS
CASE STUDY- II
DATE : 18-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 02 PRESTIGE UNIVERSITY 311717251025
LANDSCAPE MAIN CIRCULATION IN BLOCK
` VECHICLE CIRCULATION
CASE STUDY- II
DATE : 18-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 03 PRESTIGE UNIVERSITY 311717251025
RECEPTION
ADMIN AND & LOUNGE
PLACEMENT
OFFICE
FOOD COURT
SNACK
COUNTER
AUDITORIUM
OFFICE
CASE STUDY- II
DATE : 18-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 04 PRESTIGE UNIVERSITY 311717251025
COMPUTER LAB
LIBRARY
LIBRARY
AUDITORIUM
CASE STUDY- II
DATE : 18-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 05 PRESTIGE UNIVERSITY 311717251025
CLASS ROOM
CASE STUDY- II
DATE : 18-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 06 PRESTIGE UNIVERSITY 311717251025
LEVEL- 3 LEGEND LEVEL-4 LEGEND
1. EXANIBATION CONTROL OFFICE 1. VC OFFICE
2. EXECUTIVE CLASS 75 SEATS 2. BOARD ROOM
3. EXECUTIVE CLASS 134 SEATS 3. TRUST OFFICE
4. WEBSEMINAR ROOM 4. REGISTRAR OFFICE
5. TOILETS 5. TOILETS
6. COURTYARD 6. COURTYARD
7. CIRCULATION 7. CIRCULATION
8. LIFT BOBBY 8. LIFT BOBBY
9. RECEPTION
CASE STUDY- II
DATE : 18-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 07 PRESTIGE UNIVERSITY 311717251025
LOCATION : RAJIV GANDHI
SALAI,
TARAMANI,CHENNAI
ARCHITECT:
SANJAY MOHE, CHIEF
ARCHITECT
OF MINDSPACE
ARCHITECTS.
BUILT–UP
AREA : 14000 SQ M
CONCEPT:
MOHE’S APPROACH TOWARDS
GENERATIVE IDEAS FOR
DESIGN. THE DESIGN MOVES
AWAY FROM A STATIC,
MONOCHROMATIC
ARCHITECTURE THAT
DOMINATES HIS EARLIER
PROJECTS. THE COLORFUL
TRIANGLES OF THE TOY
RENDERED A VIBRANT
COMPOSITION OF PEAKS AND
NICHES THAT INSPIRED MOHE
TOWARDS THE PLAYFUL
DESIGN OF THE ROADSIDE
FAÇADE AT NIFT, CHENNAI.
THESE TRIANGULAR POCKETS
ZONING AND ANALYSIS CIRCULATION ARE DEVISED AS WIND
CATCHERS. THEY ALSO ACT AS
A BUFFER FROM THE HARSH
CHENNAI SUN AND THE NOISE
FROM THE BUSY ROAD.
DATE : 17-08-2020 CASE STUDY- II JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 01 NIFT- NATIONAL INSTITUDE OF FASHION TECHNOLOGY 311717251025
ZONING AND ANALYSIS ZONING
SINCE THE SITE IS SURROUNDED ON TWO SIDES BY ROAD AND THE THIRD BY THE RAILWAY LINE, IT WAS UNDERSTOOD THAT
APPRECIATION OF THE BUILDING IS NOT LIMITED TO CERTAIN VANTAGE POINTS THAT OFFERED THE PREFERRED VIEWS.
RATHER THIS WOULD BEA BUILDING THAT WOULD BE APERCEIVED IN MOTION,WHERE THE VIEWERS RELATIONSHIP TO BUILT
FORM WOULD CONTINUALLY BE MODIFIED BY PHYSICAL MOVEMENT ALONG THE TRANSPORTATION CONDUITS. HENCE THE
POSSIBILITY OS ‘KINETIC’ EXPRESSION WAS EXPLORED.
RECREATION
N
ACADEMIC BLOCK 4200 SQM
Relationship
diagram LOCATION : PALADI, AHMEDABAD
PALADI, AHMADABAD ARCHITECT : SARABHAI AND GIRA
EDUCATIONAL
EDUCATIONAL
STRUCTURE : RCC FRAME STRUCTURE
RECREATION RESIDENTIAL
AREA OF SITE PLAN
ACCESS SITE AREA : 63,848 sq.m
SITE
ACCESS
N TOTAL BUILT-UP AREA
FSI
: 27,488 sq.m
: 0.4
N
SABARMATI RIVER
AHMADABAD
EXISTING BUILDING
ENTRY-3 nos.
N
INDIA N MAIN ENTRANCE
PUBLIC AREA (SHOP,ATM ETC.) ZONING
CASE STUDY- I
DATE : 17-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 01 NID- NATIONAL INSTITUDE OF DESIGN , AHMADABAD 311717251025
CORE FUNCTION
CIRCULATION
CENTRAL COURTYARD
GROUND FLOOR
CIRCULATION
WORKSHOP AREA
CASE STUDY- I
DATE : 17-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 02 NID- NATIONAL INSTITUDE OF DESIGN , AHMADABAD 311717251025
A CHANNEL, 5 CM. WIDE, IS THE COURTYARDS REMAIN IN THE SHADOW FOR MOST PART OF
MAINTAINED BETWEEN THESE THE DAY. TO ALLOW THE INFLOW OF LIGHT INTO THE
SQUARES. UNDER-FLOOR WORKSHOPS, SLIDING PANELS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED WHICH
ELECTRIC WIRING IS LAID IN RUN FROM THE HEIGHT OF THE SKIRTING TOABOUT 10’ FROM
THESE CHANNELS AND FILLED THE FLOOR LEVEL.
WITH MA9S CONCRETE.
CASE STUDY- I
DATE : 17-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 03 NID- NATIONAL INSTITUDE OF DESIGN , AHMADABAD 311717251025
PRECAST CONCRETE
PRODUCTION IS PERFORMED ON
GROUND LEVEL, WHICH HELPS FLOORING CONSISTS OF SQUARES
WITH SAFETY THROUGHOUT A OF TWO MODULE LENGTH, CAST
PROJECT. THERE IS GREATER IN SITU CEMENT (PATENT STONE).
CONTROL OVER MATERIAL
QUALITY AND WORKMANSHIP IN
A PRECAST PLANT COMPARED TO
A CONSTRUCTION SITE.
CASE STUDY- I
DATE : 17-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 04 NID- NATIONAL INSTITUDE OF DESIGN , AHMADABAD 311717251025
WORKSHOP AREAS
DRAMATICS OF LIGHT AND SHADOW
CASE STUDY- I
DATE : 17-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 05 NID- NATIONAL INSTITUDE OF DESIGN , AHMADABAD 311717251025
PRO’S
I. AS OPPOSED TO CREATING AN IMPOSING EDIFICE, THE BUILDING
GRADUALLY STEPS UP FROM THE APPROACH DIRECTION BELYING
ITS 20 METRE HEIGHT.
II. The multiple functional spaces within are interspersed with naturally lit
landscaped courtyards allowing indirect light to infuse the internal volumes at
each level.
III. The east, west and southern sides of the building are enveloped with a ventilated
brick screen to mitigate heat gain in response to the climate.
IV. The common facilities like food court, an auditorium and the administrative
offices are located on the ground floor for easy access
V. The various library components are located on the first floor connected by a
bridge over the diagonal indoor street cutting across the building.
VI. The common classrooms occupy the second floor deriving light and ventilation
from the various sectional volumes and open courts.
VII. These open courts act as the spill over area for recreational activities.
VIII.The third floor houses the tiered classrooms. The fourth floor houses all the
administrative and faculty related facilities.
CON’S
IX. EVEN THOUGH THE DESIGN IS FUNCTIONAL AND
AESTHATIC,ACCESS CAN BE SEPARATED
X. TOILETS ARE IN VERY LESS WHERE USERS TO OCCUPY IT EASILY
XI. THERE’S SOME DIFFICULTY TO ACCESS FROM TOP OF THE FLOOR TO
GROUND FLOOR
OFFICE
EXAMINATION HALL AND SEMINAR`
CLASS ROOM AND AUDITORIUM
LIBRARY AND LAB
ADMIN AND AUDITORIUM
CASE STUDY- II
DATE : 18-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 08 PRESTIGE UNIVERSITY 311717251025
DESIGN NID NIFT
LOCATION PALADI, AHMEDABAD RAJIV GANDHI
ARCHITECTS SARABHAI AND GIRA SANJAY MOHE
ZONING SITE HAS BEEN DIVIDED INTO WITH ZONING HAS BEEN DONE ACCORDING TO THE
MULTIPLE ACCESS FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSE SITE’S ISUUES LIKE NOISE POLLUTIONS
AND ACCODAMATION
SERVICES I. SERVICE ROAD ARE SEPRATELY I. SERVICE ROAD ARE NOT SEPRATELY
ARRANGED WHICH DOESN’T DISTURB ARRANGED
ACCADAEMY II. ELECTRICAL ROOM HAS BEEN PLACED
II. ELECTRICAL WIRE HAS BEEN DONE ACORDING TO NORM
UNDER THE FLOOR WITH SECURE WAY III. ACCORDING TO THE VENTILATION AND
III. ACCORDING TO THE VENTILATION AND DOUBLE STORY HEIGHT OPENINGS THE
DOUBLE STORY HEIGHT OPENINGS THE VERTICAL CIRCULATION HAS BEEN
VERTICAL CIRCULATION HAS BEEN FIXED AND CREATES THE PLEAASANT
FIXED VIEW
IV. TOILETS ARE PLACED ACCORDING TO IV. TOILETS ARE PLACED ACCORDING TO
THE CORE PLACES OF MAIN BLOCK THE CORE PLACES OF MAIN BLOCK
CASE STUDY-
DATE : 17-08-2020 JEYAKUMAR V S
SHEET NO : 01 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 311717251025