0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views16 pages

Second Language Acquisition Theories

This document summarizes several theories of second language acquisition (SLA). It discusses Krashen's Input Hypothesis, which posits that language is acquired through comprehensible input that is slightly above a learner's current level. It also describes the Monitor Hypothesis, Natural Order Hypothesis, and Affective Filter Hypothesis. Additionally, it covers cognitive models including McLaughlin's attention model and implicit/explicit knowledge models. Finally, the document discusses the social constructivist model and interaction hypothesis, which emphasize the role of interaction between learners and others.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views16 pages

Second Language Acquisition Theories

This document summarizes several theories of second language acquisition (SLA). It discusses Krashen's Input Hypothesis, which posits that language is acquired through comprehensible input that is slightly above a learner's current level. It also describes the Monitor Hypothesis, Natural Order Hypothesis, and Affective Filter Hypothesis. Additionally, it covers cognitive models including McLaughlin's attention model and implicit/explicit knowledge models. Finally, the document discusses the social constructivist model and interaction hypothesis, which emphasize the role of interaction between learners and others.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Theories of

Second Language
Acquisition (SLA)
HENDRA TEDJASUKSMANA

MEETING 1
WHAT LANGUAGE IS ?
WHAT LEARNING IS ?
WHAT TEACHING IS ?

C H A P T E R 1 0 ‘ T H E O R I E S O F S L A’ P P. 2 7 1 - 2 9 9 . P R I N C I P L E S O F L A N G U A G E L E A R N I N G A N D
T E A C H I N G . F O U RT H E D . 2 0 0 0 . L O N G M A N .
INNATIST MODEL: Krashen’s Input Hypothesis:
1. Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis
- adult second language learners have 2 means of
internalizing the TL : 1. acquisition, and 2. learning.

Acquisition: subconscious and intuitive process of constructing


the system of a language.
Learning : conscious ‘learning’ process in which learners attend to
form, figure out rules and are aware of their own
process.

B R O W N , P P. 2 7 7 - 2 7 9
- Adults should do as much acquiring as possible
in order to be able to achieve communicative
fluency.
- Krashen: conscious learning & subconscious
acquisition processes are mutually exclusive.
- learning cannot become acquisition.
- recommending a lot of acquisition activities in the
classroom & a very minor role assigned to learning.
2. Monitor Hypothesis
- in learning, not in acquisition
- monitoring output, editing & altering or
correcting
- when used optimally, fluency is established
3. Natural Order Hypothesis
- acquiring language rules in a predictable or
natural order.
4. Input Hypothesis
- acquirer understand input language
(hearing & reading) that contains structure
a bit beyond his/her current level of
competence i+1
- the language exposed to learners: just far enough
beyond the current competence so that learners
understand most and are challenged to progress.
- speaking should not be taught directly or
very early in the language classroom.
- speech ‘emerges’ once the acquirer has built
up enough comprehensible input i+1.
- input should not be so far beyond the reach ,
nor so close to the current stage that no
challenge at all.
5. Affective Filter Hypothesis
- best acquisition in environments where
anxiety is low, defensiveness absent and
support present.
- so affective filter should be low.
- so less learning in the classroom, engaged in
unmonitored meaningful communication in the
classroom
Disputes over Krashen’s ideas:
- SLA : a process engaging varying degrees of
learning and of acquisition. So, acquisition
and learning are not mutually exclusive.
Both are beneficial, depending on learners’
styles & strategies.
- Comprehensible input is questioned. Such a theory
ascribes little credit to learners & their active
engagement in the process.

T H E C O N C E P T O F C O M P R E H E N S I B L E I N P U T I S N O T N E W: T H E N E W
L E A R N I N G TA S K R E L AT E S TO W H AT L E A R N E R S A L R E A D Y K N O W. L E A R N E R S
E S TA B L I S H M E A N I N G F U L N E S S I F T H E Y A R E S T R O N G LY M O T I VAT E D .
COGNITIVE MODEL
1. McLaughlin’s Attention Processing Model
- information processes: controlled & automatic
- controlled process: capacity limited &
temporary; only a very few skills retained.
- automatic process: relatively permanent by a
process of restructuring where components are
coordinated, integrated and reorganized into new
units.
- processing continuum : focal and peripheral
attention. Focal : intentional attention or
‘conscious’ attention. Peripheral: beside,
external world.
Implicit and Explicit Model
- explicit linguistic knowledge: knowing about the
language, and the ability to articulate those facts.
- implicit knowledge: information automatically and
spontaneously used in language tasks.
- children implicitly learn phonological, semantic,
syntactic, and pragmatic rules for language but do not
have access to explanation of those rules explicitly.
Social Constructivist Model
- interaction hypothesis: dynamic nature of the interplay
between learners and their peers and their teachers and
others.
- interaction between learners and others: the focus of
observation and explanation.
- comprehensible input is the result of modified interaction: ex.
Native speakers slow down speech to 2nd language learners;
parents modify speech to their children “Mommy go bye bye
now”
- Impact: lg classroom must be carefully designed; material &
curriculum developers create optimal environments & tasks for
input and interaction.
The End

You might also like