The Legal Transplants
The Legal
Alan Watson
Transplants
Alan [Link] (1933-2018)
(Scottish legal historian)
Authored almost 150 books and
articles
1974 “Legal Transplants: an
approach to Comparative Law”
“Legal Transplants: an approach to Comparative Law“
- Thesis: No necessary connection between laws and the
society in which they operate
- Laws are primarily taken from other societies, either modern or
ancient ones
- A challenge to the common mentality of a connection
between laws and its jurisdiction
- Results: a surprising longevity and acceptance of Law in
foreign conditions
Watson’s example of Legal Transplants
Roman “Texts of Emperor
Up-to-date Justinian”
works from (Roman written Law)
Belgium
Institutes of the Unwritten local customs of
Civil Law Belgium
Transplant from ROMAN WRITTEN LAW
significantly more relevant
The Impact
(general criticism and developments)
Society and Legal change
Lack between the rules and the
Longevity of legal rules needs of society
HOW ? Legal scaffolding
(elaborate systems of modification to support existing rules and
make them workable)
Studying law in Borrowing
times of great
stress
Critics to Society and Legal change
Alan’s theory unconvincing
economic pressures
Law is ”confused” due to
social pressures
is always borrowed with
the use of decision making
Milton Friedman
Law questions
HOW ?
Responsiveness Comprehensiveness Comprehensibility
The more it More answers it gives Understandable
adapts the better to law problems the by the one
better affected
Other Works
The nature of law
(1971)
Law is always created by
borrowing
The making of Civil Law Forces that control legal change
(1981)
Traditions
Differentiation of Legal Rules
Civil Law countries Institutions
Structures
A general view
(thoughts and ideas of other authors)
The triumph of Legal Transplants
Understanding Corporate Law
As the study of legal transplants
As the borrowing of ideas between legal
cultures and/or systems
IN FAVOUR AGAINST
Hoeflich’s careful and scholar His idea similar to that of Ewald
review is important as perhaps was later seen as a fairly
the best in explaining Alan’s dominant mode of criticism
thinking
Michael Hoeflich Khan Freund
Wise provided an important Recalling that the Istanbul conference of
discussion on Alan’s work the International Committee of
Corporate Law (1955)
Edward Wise
CJ Hamson
Prehistory of Legal Transplants
Savigny's theory
(Based on countries custom and
traditional values)
Transplantation of Legal Systems
Walton’s experience and studies
of codification
The Critics
(general criticism and developments)
Introduction to Pierre Legrand
Pierre Legrand
(Law professor)
“Legal transplants are impossible”
Alan Watson
vs
Pierre Legrand
Example
Is the tomato plant the same plant as it was under my care?
To conclude…