Working Capital Presentation
Working Capital Presentation
Working Capital Presentation
JAI
TODAY
A pioneer in implementing We have association with
new technologies on the global leader Ridewell
back of our extensive in- Corporation, USA, for
house R&D approved by the design and manufacturing
department of Scientific of Air Suspension and Lift
and Industrial Research Axles
.
Industry Automotive Industry
Founded 1954
Corporate office New Delhi , India
Key people Bhupinder Singh Jauhar (Chairman),
Randeep Singh Jauhar (Vice
Chairman), Pradeep Singh Jauhar
(Managing Director)
Products Multileaf Springs, Parabolic Springs,
Lift Axle, Air Suspension
Number of employees 3000
Parent Jamna Group
Type Public,
Listed on NSE, BSE
Website BSE
www.jaispring.com
EXECUTIVE TRAINING
• WRITTEN BY:
• A .K. Sharma
• Satish Kumar
Published by:
Global Business Review,2011,Vol12,Issue(1) N0.159-173
Working
capital
managemen
t
Conceptualization
Construct
CONTENTS
Hypothesis Formulation
Research Methodology
Data Analysis
Critical Review
CONSTRUCT: Studying the effect of
working capital management on
firm’s profitability.
1.Descriptive statistics
2. Correlations for study variables.
3. Regression analysis
DATA
ANALYSIS
…………….
RESULTS AND FINDINGS
– Construct
Studying the indicators of working capital management (current
ratio, financial debt ratio, assets turnover ratio, quick ratio and
gross working capital turnover ratio) of Jamna Auto Industries Ltd
in the context of profitability (return on assets) on the basis of last
five financial Years ending March31st,2015 to March31st 2019
Dependent variable
Independent
variable • Return on assets
• Current ratio
• Financial debt ratio
• Gross working capital
turnover ratio
• Assets turnover ratio
• Quick ratio
HYPOTHESIS
FORMULATION
H1: Current ratio has positive impact on return on assets
H2:Gross working capital turnover ratio has negative impact
on return on assets
H3:Financial debt ratio has negative impact on return on
assets
H4:Quick ratio has a positive impact on return on assets.
H6:Asset turnover ratio has a negative impact on return on
assets
Research Methodology
4.5
4
Assets
3.5
Turnover
3
Year Ratio
2.5
2014-15 2.4
4.68 2015-16 0.89
2
1.5
2.82 2016-17 1.19
1
2.4 2017-18 2.82
0.5
0.89 1.19 2018-19 4.68
0
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
RETURN ON TOTAL ASSETS
0.4 Return on
0.3 0.35 Year Total Assets
0.31 0.29
0.2 0.24 2014-15 0.16
0.1 0.16
2015-16 0.31
0
Return on Total Assets 2016-17 0.35
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 0.29
2017-18 2018-19
2018-19 0.24
Working Capital Turnover
Year Ratio
2014-15 -23.45
2015-16 -22.65
2016-17 2279.75
2017-18 17.36
2018-19 32.03
WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO
2500
2279.75
2000
1500
1000
500
17.36 32.03
0
-23.45 -22.65 WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO
-500
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
CURRENT RATIO
1.4
1.2 1.32
Current
1 1.12 Year Ratio
0.8
1.002
0.82 2014-15 0.82
0.6 0.745
2015-16 0.745
0.4
2016-17 1.002
0.2
2017-18 1.32
0
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2018-19 1.12
FINANCIAL DEBT RATIO
Financial
Financial Debt Ratio Year Debt Ratio
0.8
0.7 2014-15 0.6
0.6
0.5 2015-16 0.5
0.4
0.71
0.3 0.6 2016-17 0.4
0.5
0.2 0.4 0.34
0.1 2017-18 0.71
0
2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2018-19 0.34