Scribd
Upload
384 views16 pages

Population Theories Explained

Thomas Malthus believed that population grows exponentially while food production grows arithmetically, leading to periodic catastrophes of famine, disease, and war that reduce population. Neo-Malthusians argue his predictions remain valid today in some areas. Esther Boserup argued technological innovation spurred by population pressure can increase food production to support more people, as seen in the Green Revolution. However, overpopulation still risks environmental degradation in fragile ecosystems.

Uploaded by

MabelGaviolaVallena
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
384 views16 pages

Population Theories Explained

Thomas Malthus believed that population grows exponentially while food production grows arithmetically, leading to periodic catastrophes of famine, disease, and war that reduce population. Neo-Malthusians argue his predictions remain valid today in some areas. Esther Boserup argued technological innovation spurred by population pressure can increase food production to support more people, as seen in the Green Revolution. However, overpopulation still risks environmental degradation in fragile ecosystems.

Uploaded by

MabelGaviolaVallena
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Population theories

Malthus, Neo-Malthusians, and


Boserup

Thomas Malthus
The world population in 1798
was at nine million people. We
have now passed the seven
billion mark.

The Core Principles of Malthus:


Food is necessary for human
existence
Human population tends to grow
faster than the power in the earth to
produce subsistence
The effects of these two unequal
powers must be kept equal

Malthus recognised that population grows


at a geometric or exponential rate
1

4 8

16

32

However, food only increases at an


arithmetic or linear rate
1 2 3 4 5 6

and therefore he said.


War,
famine,
disease.

CHECKS
Malthus suggested that once this ceiling
(catastrophe) had been reached, further
growth in population would be prevented.

1. Negative checks (decreased


birth rate).
abstinence/ postponement of
marriage which lowered the fertility
rate.

2. Positive checks (increased


death rate)
events such as famine, disease, war increasing the mortality rate and
reducing life expectancy.

'J' Curve - Population Crash


Model

What goes up, must come down. When


population exceeds carrying capacity,
population increase crashes.

Was Malthus right?


There has been a population explosion
Africa repeated famines, wars, food
crisis, environmental degradation, soil
erosion, crop failure and disastrous
floods so was he right?

Neo-Malthusians think so...

They say, he didnt have all


the info..
Technological improvements which he
could not have foreseen
The increased amount of cropland due
to irrigation
Reduced population growth as
countries move through the DTM;
cultural decision not to have children

The Club of Rome


Group of industrialists, scientists,
economists and statesmen from 10
countries
Published The Limits to Growth in
1972

Esther Boserup 1965


Opposite to Malthus
Boserup believed that people have the
resources of knowledge and
technology to increase food supplies.
Yummy,
food is
everywhere!

i.e..
Demographic pressure (population
density) promotes innovation and
higher productivity in use of land
(irrigation, weeding, crop
intensification, better seeds) and
labor (tools, better techniques).
Green Revolution

Was she right?


Boserup argued that the changes in
technology allow for improved crop
strains and increased yields.
GM crops
Green revolution

But.
Boserup admits overpopulation can lead to
unsuitable farming practices which may
degrade the land
population pressure as one of the reasons
for desertification in the Sahal region (so
fragile environments at risk)
Potential consequences of Green Revolution

You might also like