Anodic Protection
Anodic Protection
PROTECTION
Feasibility of anodic
protection is firstly
demonstrated and tested
by Edeleanu in 1954
for
active-passive
NaCl, M
0.5
0.5
0.5
5
5
5
10-5
10-3
10-1
10-5
10-3
10-1
360
74
81
49000
29000
2000
0.64
1.1
5.1
0.41
1.0
5.3
Titanium and
chromium can be
passivated very
easily and their
passivation
process will occur
more often than
not,
spontaneously,
even in the
absence of
oxidizing agent.
Active-passive
metals only
All metals
Corrosives
Weak to
aggressive
Weak to
moderate
Relative
High
investment cost
Low
Relative
operation cost
Very low
Mediums to
high
Equipment
Potentiostat +
cathode/s
Sacrificial anodes or
DC power supply +
ICCP anode/s
Throwing
power
Very high
Low to high
Significant of
applied current
Often a direct
measure of
protected
corrosion rate
Complex
Does not
indicate
corrosion rate
Operating
conditions
Can be
accurately and
rapidly
determined by
electrochemical
measurement
Must usually be
determined by
empirical
testing
DATA
Effect of chromium content on critical
current density and Flade potential of iron
exposed in 10% sulfuric acid.
Data:
H+ reduction on platinum
i0 = 10-3 A/cm2
Tafel slope cathodic = 0.03 V/decade
SCE = +0.2416 V vs.SHE