0% found this document useful (0 votes)
579 views24 pages

Sustaining Competitive Advantage Strategies

The document discusses strategies for achieving and sustaining competitive advantage. It states that sustainability requires responding to threats and maintaining advantages by erecting barriers against competition. Firms can gain advantage by being cheaper, having better quality, innovating faster, or through successful branding. Recognizing patterns in emerging markets allows firms to exploit opportunities related to scanning, analysis, risk-taking, implementation and change management capabilities. The document also discusses Porter's view that competitive advantages ultimately stem from resources and capabilities that are difficult to replicate.

Uploaded by

saurabh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
579 views24 pages

Sustaining Competitive Advantage Strategies

The document discusses strategies for achieving and sustaining competitive advantage. It states that sustainability requires responding to threats and maintaining advantages by erecting barriers against competition. Firms can gain advantage by being cheaper, having better quality, innovating faster, or through successful branding. Recognizing patterns in emerging markets allows firms to exploit opportunities related to scanning, analysis, risk-taking, implementation and change management capabilities. The document also discusses Porter's view that competitive advantages ultimately stem from resources and capabilities that are difficult to replicate.

Uploaded by

saurabh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF or read online on Scribd

Presented by-:

Manas Kumar
Saurav Kumar
Saurabh Singh
SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGE
Sustainability is a framework for
responding to the emerging competitive
threats and maintaining competitive
advantage.
Sustaining competitive advantage requires
erecting barriers against the competition.
A competitive strategy consists of moves to
1) Attract customers
2) Withstand competitive pressures
3) Strengthen an organization’s market position
CREATE COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGE
Cheaper (lower cost) producer: ?
Better (superior perceived quality): ?
Newer (more innovative/up to
date/fashionable): ?
Faster (speed to market): ?
More desirable/ distinctive (successful
branding):?
Better reputation: ?
First mover advantages: ?
Provide your own examples of firms that
compete successfully on this basis. 3
RECOGNISING PATTERNS
 Advantage comes from understanding and exploiting the
emerging competitive market patterns. There is scope for
advantage based on:
 Search/ scanning capabilities
 Analysis/ interpretation capabilities
 Risk taking capabilities
 Implementation capabilities
 Change management capabilities
 Ownership of/ access to required complementary assets/
capabilities
 The ability to do this depends in turn on the effectiveness and
integration of the appropriate key business activities and
processes (distinctive capabilities/ competencies) which
underlie cost competitiveness, quality, innovation, speed to
market, network building, and customer intimacy.
 Production, marketing, logistics, supply chain management,
collaboration, branding, quality, market development, product
development, and innovation.
 Which in turn depends on organisational processes and
practices such as HRM, information and decision management,
and relationship management.
4
Porter’s approach to CA
Low cost/ differentiation may indeed be the
proximate cause of CA but they cannot be the
ultimate source.
Low cost positions, superior quality, speed to
market, or whatever, must come from
something or other the organisation has or
does.
For example in Ricardo’s time the superior returns
(CA) of some farmers indeed came from lower costs
which derived ultimately from superior quality (ie
more productive) land, a resource that was very
hard to make more of!
Nowadays Nokia’s or Dell’s superior returns come
ultimately from something similar, something
(scarce and hard to make more of) which allows
them to do things which enable them to offer a
better ‘value for money’ proposition to consumers.
manecon/options/create 5
Conditions for sustaining a
competitive advantage
A difference that matters
A gap in capabilities
1. Gap in business system
2. Gap in position
3. Regulatory and legal gaps
4. Gap in R&D and implementation
Sustainable differentiation
SWOT ANALYSIS OF
SUZLON(THREATS)
Intense competition
Over dependence on US
Foreign Exchange Risk
Technology Risk
Decreasing price of crude oil
SWOT ANALYSIS OF SUZLON
STRENGTH(Company Values)
 People strength
 Aggressive Vertical Integration Strategy
 Strong R&D team
 Expanding Manufacturing Capabilities
 Strong Order Book
 Aggressive Growth
SWOT ANALYSIS OF
SUZLON(STRENGTH)
 Cost Reduction
 Reverse Outsourcing
 End to End Solution
 Vertical Integration and Amalgamation
 Market Leadership in India and Global
Presence
 Growth
 Integrated Business model
SWOT ANALYSIS OF
SUZLON(WEAKNESS)
 Management Structure
 Capital Intensive
 Overseas Business
 Cash Conversion
 Growth in asset overweighting growth in
revenue
SWOT ANALYSIS OF
SUZLON(OPPURTUNITIES)
Environmental and Governmental Initiatives
Favorable tax exemptions
Untapped offshore market
Steady source of demand
SWOT ANALYSIS OF
SUZLON(THREATS)
Intense competition
Over dependence on US
Foreign Exchange Risk
Technology Risk
Decreasing price of crude oil
Company overview
Company overview
Timeline & Select
Milestones
Suzlon group – global
presence
Acquisition of Hansen
Transmission
Drivers for growth
Three key drivers to go beyond India:
1. Access to technology
Technical collaboration with Südwind (1995)
internalizing R&D by 1997/8
 Formation of AE Rotors in the Netherland•
Netherlands
 Product and process engineering in India
 Alliances: e.g. joint venture with Elin Generators
Maiden venture into the US market (2002/3)
 European technology platform
Experienced European wind energy professionals
(engineers, researchers,
 technicians) as the core to drive Suzlon’s R&D
 Compete in India
2. Access to people
 Experienced professionals in e.g. international sales, project management,
service
 management etc. with existing and tested relationships comprising the core
team
 Follow the demand – North America, Europe, Australia, China etc.
 Creation of Business Units (local organisations, local manufacturing etc.)
 Follow shift in customer trends (consolidating and becoming bigger more
complex
 higher demands for technology, services, Industrial plans etc.
3. Access to new markets/customers
 Acquisitions: Repower / Hansen Transmissions
 enter new markets and access new customers
 build up experienced and international (but localized) managerial/specialist
base
 local manufacturing to lower transportation costs
 expand product portfolio
 access state-of-the-art technology
Edge over competitors
Proactively addressing
challenges at their root
Blade cracks
 Retrofit exercise under way after satisfactory conclusion of
RCA and solution
Order book slowdown
 S88 V3, with demonstrable performance, positioned as
mainstay for internationalmarket
 Strong pipeline of potential customers
 Cost competitiveness, vertical integration and expanded
scope of services toprovide edge in tough market conditions
Global credit crisis
 Well-diversified market reach hedges
geographical risk
 Focusing on key markets and customer
relationships
 Current customer profile dominated by utilities
and financially sound developers
Working capital management
Working capital buildup
 Working capital reduction plan designed in
association with AT Kearney
Receivables
 Program management for order fulfillment
 Improvement in production planning process
 Improvement in documentation and certification
process
Inventories
 Procurement reduction
 Non- and slow-moving inventory reduction
 Redistribution of excess between units
 Mismatch and excess inventory reduction
Sustaining competetive
advantage

You might also like