Creating A Responsibility Matrix
Creating A Responsibility Matrix
Utility
Project Task Client Consultant Contractor Supplier
Company
Feasibility Study A R C
Site Survey & Soil Investigation C A/R R I
Design & Engineering I A/R C C
Procurement of Equipment
I C A/R R I
(Transformers, Switchgear, etc.)
Civil Works (Foundations, Fencing,
I C A/R I
etc.)
Electrical Installation (Cables, Panels) I C A/R I
Transformer Installation & Testing I C A/R R I
SCADA & Protection System
I A/R C R C
Integration
Utility Interconnection & Approvals C C R A/R
Commissioning & Handover C A R I
Final Documentation & As-Built
I A/R R I
Drawings
🔍 RACI Key:
This matrix can be customized based on your project's structure, whether it's EPC (Engineering,
Procurement, Construction), turnkey, or design-bid-build. If you'd like, I can help you build a
version specific to your team or project phase. Want to dive deeper into one of these roles or
tasks?
Creating a Responsibility Matrix (often called a RACI matrix) for a 15MVA substation
construction project is essential to ensure clarity, accountability, and smooth coordination
among all stakeholders. Here's a tailored example to guide you:
⚡ Responsibility Matrix for 15MVA Substation Construction
Utility
Project Task Client Consultant Contractor Supplier
Company
Feasibility Study A R C
Site Survey & Soil Investigation C A/R R I
Design & Engineering I A/R C C
Procurement of Equipment
I C A/R R I
(Transformers, Switchgear, etc.)
Civil Works (Foundations, Fencing,
I C A/R I
etc.)
Electrical Installation (Cables, Panels) I C A/R I
Transformer Installation & Testing I C A/R R I
SCADA & Protection System
I A/R C R C
Integration
Utility Interconnection & Approvals C C R A/R
Commissioning & Handover C A R I
Final Documentation & As-Built
I A/R R I
Drawings
🔍 RACI Key:
This matrix can be customized based on your project's structure, whether it's EPC (Engineering,
Procurement, Construction), turnkey, or design-bid-build. If you'd like, I can help you build a
version specific to your team or project phase. Want to dive deeper into one of these roles or
tasks?
Absolutely, Kunle! Let’s tailor the responsibility matrix to fit your specific project team for the
15MVA substation construction. To do that, I’ll need a few details from you:
1. Team Roles: Who are the main players on your team? For example:
o Project Manager
o Civil Engineer
o Electrical Engineer
o Procurement Officer
o Safety Officer
o QA/QC Engineer
o Site Supervisor
o Client Representative
o Utility Liaison
2. Project Delivery Method: Is this an EPC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction)
contract, design-bid-build, or turnkey?
3. Any External Stakeholders: Are there consultants, government agencies, or utility
companies involved?
4. Specific Tasks You Want to Track: Do you want to include everything from design to
commissioning, or focus on construction only?
🔧 Once I have that, I’ll build you a customized RACI matrix like this:
Just drop me the team structure and any specific tasks or phases you want included, and I’ll build
the full matrix for you. Want to start with the team roles?
Perfect, Kunle! Since you've shared the core team roles—Project Manager, Client
Representative, and Utility Liaison—I'll build a customized Responsibility Matrix for your
15MVA substation construction project using those roles. I’ll assume this is a turnkey or EPC-
style project, but let me know if it’s different.
🔍 RACI Key:
Would you like to expand this to include contractors, engineers, or procurement officers? Or
maybe break it down by phases like pre-construction, construction, and commissioning? I can
build that out for you too.
hanks for confirming, Kunle! Since your project follows the EPC (Engineering, Procurement,
Construction) delivery method, we can now build a more precise and practical Responsibility
Matrix that reflects how roles are typically structured in EPC projects.
🔍 RACI Key:
This version reflects the centralized control typical of EPC contracts, where the Project
Manager drives most activities, the Client Representative ensures alignment with expectations,
and the Utility Liaison handles coordination with external power authorities.
Would you like to expand this to include contractors, engineers, or QA/QC roles? Or maybe
break it down by project phases like pre-construction, construction, and commissioning? I can
build that out for you next.
Great, Kunle! Since your 15MVA substation project involves consultants, government
agencies, and EKEDC (Eko Electricity Distribution Company), we can now expand your
Responsibility Matrix to reflect these external stakeholders. Here's how each typically
contributes:
🔍 RACI Key:
Perfect, Kunle. Since you want to track everything from design to commissioning for your
15MVA substation EPC project, and you've already shared your core team and external
stakeholders (Client Rep, Utility Liaison, Consultants, Government Agencies, EKEDC), here's a
comprehensive Responsibility Matrix that spans the full project lifecycle.
Introduction
In Nigeria’s rapidly growing energy sector, the design and construction of electrical substations
are crucial to meeting the increasing demand for reliable power supply, particularly in
metropolitan regions served by utilities like Eko Electricity Distribution Company (EKEDC).
The delivery of a 15MVA substation encompasses a complex array of engineering, procurement,
and construction (EPC) tasks, each requiring precise allocation of responsibilities among internal
roles—such as the Project Manager, Client Representative, Utility Liaison—and external
stakeholders, including consultants, regulatory authorities, and the utility itself. Efficient
coordination and clear demarcation of duties are vital to ensure compliance with Nigerian
standards, timely delivery, and operational reliability.
1. Pre-Design Phase
A feasibility study acts as a foundation, evaluating the technical, economic, and regulatory
practicality of building a 15MVA substation at the selected site. In Nigeria, this process critically
involves assessing grid requirements (such as those set out by EKEDC and the Nigerian
Electricity Regulatory Commission, NERC), projected load growth, integration with distribution
networks, and local transmission capacity constraints.
The study also reviews site accessibility, land tenure (often entailing government or community
engagement), environmental sensitivities, and alignment with Nigeria’s electricity masterplans.
Economic analysis typically accounts for CAPEX, OPEX, lifecycle planning, and tariff impacts.
Professional consultants and local EPC contractors are often engaged at this stage to execute
technical audits and provide cost projections in accordance with NERC guidelines.
Following feasibility approval, detailed site surveys ascertain topographic, geotechnical, and
hydrological parameters. This is vital for proper design, construction staging, and minimizing
environmental and social impacts. Nigerian practice emphasizes compliance with NESIS
regulations (Nigerian Electricity Supply and Installation Standards) and NEMSA (Nigerian
Electricity Management Services Agency) oversight.
Modern approaches often combine satellite imagery, drone reconnaissance, and in-situ soil
testing. Consultants and external survey contractors must coordinate with community
representatives and, where applicable, land use authorities or urban planners to confirm
boundaries and utility access provisions.
1.3 Environmental Impact Assessment for Power Substations in Nigeria
Nigerian law mandates an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for all substation projects
above a threshold capacity, in line with national EIA Acts and NERC environmental compliance
requirements. The EIA process typically covers baseline studies, community consultation,
environmental/health risks, biodiversity considerations, and the preparation of
mitigation/compensation plans.
Applications for EIA approval require submission to the Federal Ministry of Environment.
Approval is an essential milestone before financial closure or construction mobilization. All
stakeholders—including the utility, project proponent, and local authorities—are “consulted” or
“informed” during EIA proceedings, with specialists and regulatory agencies responsible for
procedural execution and oversight.
Successful project kick-off depends on approvals from government entities such as the Federal
Ministry of Power, NERC, NEMSA, State-level physical planning agencies, and, critically, the
local utility (EKEDC). Land acquisition, grid connection agreements, and permits for
construction and environmental compliance form the regulatory backdrop for project
advancement.
The preceding RACI matrix illustrates a typical division of responsibilities for the Pre-Design
phase of a Nigerian substation project. The Project Manager takes a directive role (“A” and/or
“R”) in orchestrating technical and stakeholder tasks, while the Client Representative is focused
on securing regulatory permits and coordinating with agencies. Utility Liaisons and EKEDC
representatives are engaged to align the project scope with network requirements. The
Consultant is essential for specialist tasks such as feasibility assessments and EIAs, whereas
government agencies exert decisive influence over environmental review and permitting actions.
Community consultations are recognized as a core feature, with engagement often mediated by
external consultants or directly by the Client Representative.
2. Design Phase
Substation design must conform to rigorous technical and regulatory standards. In Nigeria,
designs are harmonized with NESIS and often reference international standards such as IEC
61850 (for substation automation communications and protection), IEEE, and local utility
specifications.
The Project Manager and internal engineering team lead the design process, collaborating closely
with EPC consultants and EKEDC’s technical team to ensure compatibility with distribution
network and automation requirements. Iterative design reviews and formal approvals by
regulatory authorities and the utility are mandatory at key milestones.
For substations interfacing with EKEDC, adherence to their specific interconnection protocols is
critical. EKEDC’s requirements typically stipulate technical specifications for metering,
interface protection, SCADA points, fault levels, and relay coordination.
The Design phase concludes with the delivery of signed-off engineering drawings, bills of
quantities (BoQs), and specifications, ready for procurement. Approval documentation from
NEMSA/NERC and the utility is a prerequisite for subsequent stages.
RACI Matrix – Design Phase
The Design phase’s matrix emphasizes the leadership of the Project Manager and design
engineers, with consultants providing specialist expertise. The Utility Liaison, working closely
with EKEDC, is responsible for facilitating interconnection agreements and ensuring technical
standards are met. Regulatory agencies are “Accountable” where their approvals are compulsory,
while the Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) function checks the integrity of designs
before they enter procurement.
3. Procurement Phase
In Nigeria, procurement also requires adherence to local content policies and anti-corruption
regulations—often monitored by NERC and government procurement agencies. For mission-
critical items like transformers, witnessed Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) is a standard
prerequisite. The Project Manager orchestrates procurement activities, with significant
consulting input for technical reviews and vendor audits. The Client typically retains final sign-
off on high-value procurement decisions.
The Project Manager holds central responsibility for procurement scheduling, risk management,
and financial control, ensuring materials/services are in place to avoid construction delays. The
Utility Liaison is engaged for technical clarifications with EKEDC, particularly where variations
arise in specification or timelines threaten grid integration commitments. The Client’s
Representative typically authorizes final selection of vendors, ensuring compliance with project,
utility, and regulatory requirements.
Within procurement, the Project Manager is responsible and often accountable for plan
execution, risk tracking, and coordination of vendor activities. Consultants participate in
specialist evaluations and technical reviews. The Procurement Officer manages the granular
sourcing activities, while regulatory and utility stakeholders have a consultative role to ensure
compliance and grid compatibility. Vendors/contractors are responsible for execution tasks such
as delivery logistics and FAT arrangements.
4. Construction Phase
Daily site operations are typically supervised by the EPC’s Site Manager in cooperation with the
Project Manager, supported by Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) officers, QA/QC teams,
and specialist subcontractors. Regular reporting—both to the client and relevant authorities—is
essential for tracking progress and compliance.
As reflected above, the Project Manager remains the “accountable” party for project delivery,
coordinating all internal and external activities. Site Managers/Contractors direct operations on
the ground, while regulatory compliance falls under both NEMSA/Government agency
inspection and the utility’s (EKEDC) periodic checks. HSE Officers take primary responsibility
for safety culture and statutory reporting. The Client Representative stays actively engaged in
community relations, acting as primary liaison for issue escalation or resolution.
Procedures in Nigeria are codified by NEMSA and NERC guidelines, augmented by EKEDC-
specific requirements for grid synchronization and interconnection safety. Witnessed tests (by
the client, utility, and regulatory officials) bolster the independence and credibility of the
commissioning process.
The Project Manager ensures all systems are ready for testing, coordinates schedules, and
manages punch list rectification. Specialist commissioners/consultants implement test plans,
while EKEDC engineers verify grid interface parameters and approve connection readiness.
Regulatory inspectors confirm statutory and operational compliance.
Responsibility for test planning and execution is split between the Project Manager and the
Commissioning Engineer. Regulatory agencies are deeply involved in test witnessing and system
sign-off, while EKEDC assumes increased prominence as the handover agent. Consultants
support as technical specialists, while QA/QC officers ensure the documentation trail is complete
and unambiguous, supporting regulatory and warranty compliance.
The EPC contract culminates in a formal handover process, comprising system documentation
transfer, training of operations personnel, verification of “as-built” asset registers, and, when
applicable, completion of snag list (defects correction) items. The Nigerian context dictates that
regulatory approvals from NEMSA/NERC, as well as EKEDC, must be recorded in the handover
dossier.
Warranties, maintenance manuals, and operations training form crucial parts of closeout.
Transfer of responsibility for ongoing O&M (Operations & Maintenance) is carefully
documented—supported in some cases by short-term EPC monitoring contracts to guarantee
early reliability.
Effective deployment of a responsibility matrix during closeout hinges upon careful definition of
document custodianship (Client Rep/Project Manager), clear criteria for snag list resolution, and
unambiguous communication protocols for warranty claims. International best practice further
recommends an “after-action review” (lessons learned workshop), engaging all parties—
including regulators and utility staff—for process improvement and risk reduction on future
projects.
O&
Project Utility Govt.
Clien Consulta EKED M QA/ Subcontracto
Activity/Task Manage Liaiso Agencie
t Rep nt C Tea QC rs
r n s
m
Handover R/A A/R C C I C I R I
O&
Project Utility Govt.
Clien Consulta EKED M QA/ Subcontracto
Activity/Task Manage Liaiso Agencie
t Rep nt C Tea QC rs
r n s
m
Documentation
Training
Operations R/A I C C I C A/R C C
Staff
As-Built
Records R/A I C C I I I A/R C
Submission
Regulatory
Approval C I C C A/R C I I I
Signoff
Defects List
R/A I I C I C I C R/A
(Snagging)
Lessons
Learned R R C C C C C I C
Review
Warranty/
Claims R/A C I C I I R C C
Management
During the handover and closeout phase, the Project Manager and Client Representative are
“Accountable” for final documentation and the transfer of operational responsibility. The O&M
team assumes new “Responsible” roles for ongoing maintenance, while regulatory agents are
“Accountable” for final sign-off. Subcontractors may retain “Accountable” and “Responsible”
status for resolution of outstanding defects, based on contractual obligations.
A 15MVA substation construction project must comply with the regulatory framework of the
Nigerian electricity market—principally governed by NERC, NEMSA, and NESIS. Licensing,
inspection, safety certification, and grid code compliance are rigorously enforced at each phase.
Further, EKEDC’s operational territory in Lagos is subject to additional technical scrutiny due to
the urban criticality of power supply, load flow sensitivities, and historical issues of grid
reliability. Key standards to which the EPC matrix must align include:
Creating an effective EPC Responsibility Matrix entails early stakeholder engagement, iterative
updates in response to project changes, and explicit assignment of “Accountable” roles for every
deliverable. Continuous training in matrix use and proactive resolution of grey areas (often
arising during design changes or regulatory shifts) ensures a living document that enhances
governance and project control.
International guidelines reinforce the value of digital project management tools for matrix
tracking, version control, and integration with scheduling, budgeting, and risk management
platforms.
Examining recent projects in Nigeria, such as the commissioning of new 15MVA substations by
major utilities (e.g., Ikeja Electric’s Kwaru 15MVA substation, EKEDC’s 2x20MVA substation
initiative), reveals that robust assignment matrices correlate with delivery success and fewer
regulatory disputes. These cases underscore the necessity of deep regulatory engagement
(including repeated joint inspections and test witnessing) and elaborate on the value of
documented role assignments for responding efficiently to emergent technical, environmental, or
social challenges.
Stakeholder consultation extends throughout the project, embedding feedback loops for
regulatory, community, and utility inputs. Lessons learned and best practices are fed back into
future project matrix calibrations, fostering a culture of continuous improvement—now widely
regarded as essential for EPC contractors seeking to operate successfully within Nigeria’s
challenging energy project environment.
9. Conclusion
This report has detailed the specific requirements, best practices, and responsible parties for each
phase of such a project—from conception to commissioning and closeout—supported by the
most current sector guidelines and case studies. Implementation of this matrix-centered
methodology is vital to ensuring that all parties, from project managers to utility officials and
regulatory agents, are aligned in purpose and action across the project’s lifecycle.
In summary, the strength of an EPC Responsibility Matrix lies in its adaptability, clarity, and
inclusivity, forming the connective tissue across technical, regulatory, and community interfaces
that will define the future of reliable power infrastructure not only in Lagos, but across Nigeria.