1
DAILY
CLASS NOTES
Geography
Lecture – 103
Theories of Population Growth (Part 02)
2
Theories of Population Growth (Part 02)
Other Contemporary Theories in Population Growth
Doubleday’s Diet Theory:
Doubleday argued that when the quantity of food supply is greater, the rate of
population increase will be lower.
He distinguished between the Plethoric state, characterized by good food supply and
low fertility, and the Deplethoric state, characterized by food shortages and high
fertility.
Doubleday believed that leanness in plants and animals affected fertility. Overfed plants
could be revived through methods such as ringing the bark or extreme lopping.
He observed that thin birds or animals and individuals on a vegetarian or rice-rich diet
had higher fertility, while bulky or fat individuals had lower fertility.
Doubleday divided society into three groups: the affluent, the poor with less food supply
(experiencing rapid population increase), and the middle group with stable numbers.
He concluded that the increase or decrease in population depended on the numerical
proportion of these three groups in society.
Doubleday also proposed that the rich have fewer children, leading to the transfer of
wealth to the poor and subsequent redistribution.
Criticisms of Doubleday's theory include the lack of scientific basis for the inverse
relationship between food supply and fertility, discrepancies between theory and real-
world observations, and the oversimplification of factors influencing fertility and
population dynamics.
3
Critics also questioned the presumption that fatness is solely linked to fertility and the
idea that socialism would automatically arise through the distribution of wealth by
nature.
Confusion between fertility and fecundity, as well as the limited impact of diet on
fecundity, were additional criticisms of Doubleday's theory.
Protein Consumption Theory by Castro’s:
Jouse De Castro's Protein Consumption Theory suggests a link between protein
consumption and fertility.
Experiments on rats showed that higher protein intake leads to lower fecundity, while
lower protein intake increases fecundity.
Castro argued that fatness is influenced by protein consumption, with a protein-rich
diet decreasing fertility.
The theory highlights the relationship between liver function and reproductive capacity.
Critics note that high fertility is observed in developed countries despite increased
protein consumption.
Other factors such as poverty, imbalanced food, and cultural influences also affect
population growth.
Economists question the theory's exclusive focus on diet and its claim that fertility
declines with economic development.
Population Growth Theory by Michael Thomas Sadler:
Michael Thomas Sadler, a British social reformer and economist, proposed the "Destiny
Theory" in his book "The Law of Population."
Sadler believed that the law governing the growth of animals and plants is the same
as the law governing human population growth.
4
According to Sadler, as population density increases, fertility rates decrease. In low-
density agricultural or pastoral countries, fertility rates are higher due to hardworking
individuals.
Sadler criticized Malthus's idea of geometric population growth and arithmetic food
supply growth, arguing that density increases with population, leading to lower fertility
rates.
He rejected the concept of positive checks on population growth and preventive birth
control measures proposed by Malthus.
Sadler emphasized a connection between population and food supply, suggesting that
increasing fertility rates would enable sufficient food production to meet needs.
Sadler also claimed that increasing population density leads to an unhealthy
atmosphere and higher death rates, with the birth rate compensating for population
loss.
Critics pointed out that Sadler did not differentiate between fecundity and fertility
and lacked biological evidence to support the idea that density affects both.
In many high-density countries, fertility rates remain high, contradicting Sadler's
theory.
Sadler's statements about decreasing fertility rates with increasing density and the
compensatory increase in fertility rates are self-contradictory.
His claim that industrialization leads to a decline in population growth has not been
proven, especially in the case of countries like India.
Overall, while Sadler's theory offered optimism, it faced criticism due to inconsistencies
and the lack of empirical evidence supporting his claims.
5
Herbert Spencer's Biological Theory:
Herbert Spencer, an English philosopher and sociologist, presented the biological theory
of population in his book "The Principles of Biology."
Spencer argued that fecundity decreases as life becomes more complex.
His theory is considered a natural theory of population, similar to the theories of Sadler
and Doubleday.
According to Spencer, there is an antagonism between individuation (survival) and
genesis (reproduction). When individuals focus on personal development, the desire for
reproduction decreases, resulting in lower population growth.
Rural individuals with simpler lives tend to have higher fertility rates, while industrial
societies with more complex lives, educational pressures, and mental taxation
experience lower fertility rates.
Spencer identified four situations regarding the relation between individuation and
genesis: high genesis and low individuation among the poor, low genesis and high
individuation among the rich, improved individuation when genesis is low, and high
genesis when individuation is low among the poor.
High fertility leads to lower individuation, increased death rates, and decreased life
expectancy. Spencer suggested that decreasing the birth rate would increase life
expectancy.
Spencer's theory is rooted in the theory of evolution, stating that fertility rates are
higher in smaller creatures. He applied this concept to human fertility as well.
He divided people into three groups: the poor with high fertility, the middle class with
correspondingly low fertility, and the developed or complex-living individuals with
fairly low fertility.
6
According to Spencer, educated women from affluent families have lower reproductive
power due to their education and complex lives.
Spencer believed that increasing population was beneficial as it provides more
manpower for exploiting natural resources and raising socio-economic and cultural
standards.
Critics of Spencer's theory argue that it is more of a biological theory than a
comprehensive population theory.
The idea that fertility decreases with a more complex life lacks empirical evidence, as
high fertility rates are observed in rich families and industrialized societies.
Population growth is a complex phenomenon that cannot be solely explained by
biological factors.
The assumption that educated women with high individuation would be relatively
infertile is not realistic, as educated women can still have high reproductive power.
Spencer's theory linking fertility to the natural process of individuation lacks
justification, especially considering the high birth rates in Western countries during his
time.
Leibenstein's Motivational Theory of Population Growth:
Leibenstein's Motivational Theory of Population Growth is part of his Critical Minimum
Effort Thesis on economic development.
The theory suggests that the rate of population growth is influenced by the level of per
capita income, which, in turn, depends on the stage of economic development.
Leibenstein's view is based on Dumont's "Social-capillarity Thesis," which states that as
per capita income increases, the desire to have more children as productive agents
decreases.
7
This means that as per capita income rises with economic development, the fertility
rate declines, while the mortality rate also decreases due to improved public health
measures.
However, the decline in the mortality rate is faster than the decline in the fertility
rate, creating a "fertility gap" that widens over time.
Leibenstein explains the fertility gap in terms of the cost-benefit analysis of raising an
additional child, considering consumption utility, productive utility, and old age
security utility as the benefits parents derive from an additional child.
The costs of raising an additional child include direct costs (such as feeding, clothing,
and education) and indirect costs (such as foregone opportunities and reduced mobility
for parents).
Leibenstein identifies three effects that influence utilities and costs during economic
development: the income effect, survival effect, and occupational distribution effect.
The income effect shows that as per capita income increases, consumption utility
remains constant, while security and productive utilities decline.
Leibenstein's motivational theory relates to different stages of economic development,
where an increase in per capita income initially raises the growth rate of population
but eventually leads to a decline in fertility rates.
However, Leibenstein's theory has received criticism for not acknowledging the role of
declining mortality rates and socio-cultural factors in birth rate decline, as well as
neglecting the importance of state efforts in reducing birth rates.
The theory suggests that motivations for additional children are stronger at lower
levels of per capita income and decline as per capita income increases, along with
increasing costs and decreasing utilities.
These patterns are closely linked to different stages of economic development.
8
Social Theories on Population Growth:
1. Social Capillarity Theory:(Arsene Dumont)
In 1890, French scholar Arsene Dumont introduced the theory known as "Social
Capillarity." Dumont proposed that in a civilized society, the fertility behavior of the
population is governed by the principle of social capillarity.
This principle recognizes that every society has a hierarchical social order, where
individuals in higher positions enjoy greater prestige compared to those in lower
positions.
According to Dumont, individuals consistently strive to improve their social status and
move up in the social hierarchy. However, having a large family is seen as an obstacle
to upward social mobility.
Dumont attributed variations in fertility among different individuals to their aspiration
to ascend in the social order, which he referred to as social capillarity. This desire to
advance socially is distinct from the pursuit of power or wealth to dominate others.
While the principle of social capillarity exists in all societies, it is more influential in
communities characterized by high social mobility. Conversely, in societies where social
status and caste systems are rigid, social capillarity has limited impact.
Dumont argued that poverty is not the cause of high fertility. Drawing from
demographic data in France, he contended that regions with high fertility rates are
often distant from urban centers and plagued by ignorance and poverty.
Similarly, Dumont refuted the notion that wealth is the cause of low fertility, as both
wealth and low fertility are outcomes of the desire to ascend in the social hierarchy. He
proposed that the principle of social capillarity explains fertility differentials not only
within a country but also between different countries.
9
The principle of social capillarity was the first logical attempt to explain fertility
transition, and its influence can be seen in subsequent writings. For example, Kingslay
Davis' theory of change and response in fertility also acknowledges the role of the desire
for social advancement in declining fertility.
Even today, the principle of social capillarity remains relevant in explaining variations
in fertility levels within and between countries. However, the theory received criticism
for lacking substantial statistical evidence. Nevertheless, Dumont deserves credit for
highlighting the importance of investigating individuals' psychological attributes in their
social context when explaining fertility levels.
Theory of Increasing Prosperity(L. Brentano):
In 1910, L. Brentano proposed the Theory of Increasing Prosperity as an explanation
for fertility differentials.
Brentano argues that variations in material prosperity are key factors influencing
fertility differences among different groups of people.
Human beings are driven by pleasure, but the sources of pleasure vary among different
groups.
Economically disadvantaged individuals, with limited alternative sources of pleasure,
tend to compensate for this deprivation through sexual indulgence, resulting in higher
fertility levels.
Wealthy individuals, on the other hand, have numerous competing pleasures outside
the family sphere.
Brentano suggests that a decline in fertility levels is a result of progress in technology,
science, industry, and commerce, which provide more pleasure options accessible to a
growing population.
10
To pursue these pleasures, individuals need material means, and they face a choice
between family size and seeking pleasure.
Brentano clarifies that a decline in birth rates with increasing prosperity does not
imply increased sexual abstinence.
However, Brentano fails to distinguish between sexual enjoyment and the pleasure
derived from parenthood.
For the economically disadvantaged, sexual indulgence and the desire for offspring are
interconnected, whereas this connection does not hold true for the wealthy.
Brentano's theory suggests that the poor's high birth rates are influenced by their
reliance on sexual indulgence due to limited contraceptive knowledge, whereas
ignorance, rather than pleasure, determines fertility levels.
Among the wealthy, there is no increase in sexual abstinence, and the choice lies
between parenthood and alternative pleasures.
Boserup Theory of Agricultural Development:
Boserup Theory: Boserup's theory focuses on the causes and processes of agricultural
development, challenging the classical economist Malthus and proposing an alternative
perspective.
Population Pressure: Boserup argues that agricultural development is driven by population
pressure, meaning that the increasing population creates a compulsion for agricultural
progress.
Patterns and Techniques: The development of cultivation patterns and techniques is
influenced by the growth of the population, according to Boserup's theory.
Examination of African and Latin American Countries: Boserup supports her contention
by examining the agricultural development in various African and Latin American
countries.
11
John Stuart Mill:
John Stuart Mill's central claim was that fertility rates are significantly influenced by
the style of living.
Rather than pursuing excessive riches, the ideal condition is one in which all members
of a community are economically comfortable.
The population will stabilise and people will advance in terms of culture, morals, and
society at this optimum position.
Theory of wealth flows by John Caldwell (1976):
The intergenerational movements of money and services affect fertility trends.
Parents will prefer to have big families if there are flows from children to their parents.
Parents will choose to have small families if flows run from them to their kids.
Lower fertility depends heavily on the family's "emotional" nucleation.
Parents start to prioritise their children and grandkids above their forebears and
extended relatives.