0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views3 pages

Untitled Document

Uploaded by

anchaljana334
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views3 pages

Untitled Document

Uploaded by

anchaljana334
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

The Encoding/Decoding model by Stuart Hall (1973) explains how media messages are

created, shared, and interpreted. In this model, encoding is the process where the sender
produces a message using symbols (words, images, gestures) with the intent that the receiver
will understand. Decoding is how the audience interprets that message based on their own
social context and experiences.

Hall emphasizes that audiences are not passive—they actively interpret messages, which can
lead to different understandings from the intended meaning. This process involves both verbal
and non-verbal communication. Miscommunication or misunderstanding may occur when
there's a mismatch between the sender's encoding and the receiver's decoding, leading to
distortion in the message's meaning.

---

Stuart Hall’s Four-Stage Theory of Communication: A Summary

Stuart Hall, in his influential essay, critiques the traditional circulation loop model of
communication for being overly linear, treating communication as a simple sender-to-receiver
process that ignores the structural and relational aspects of communication. Instead, he
proposes a four-stage model comprising production, circulation, distribution/consumption, and
reproduction—each a “linked but distinctive moment” that plays a crucial role in the
communication process.

1. Production

Messages are constructed using specific codes and discursive rules within institutional
frameworks like broadcasting. These messages are shaped by ideologies, audience
assumptions, and technical setups. Importantly, audience feedback also plays a role, making
the process non-linear and more dynamic.

2. Circulation

Once produced, the message enters the field of circulation where it begins to interact with
audience contexts. Televisual messages, for instance, are structured in aural-visual forms
according to discursive rules. Hall stresses that “the event must become a story” to be
communicated, meaning messages must be encoded in cultural codes and language.

3. Distribution/Consumption

At this stage, the message is decoded by audiences. However, decoding is not guaranteed to
match encoding due to asymmetry between producer and receiver codes. These
misunderstandings stem from differing social and institutional positions, challenging earlier
positivist models that assumed direct cause-effect communication.

4. Reproduction

For a message to be fully effective, it must be translated into social practices—this completes
the communication cycle. Thus, meaning is not just received but also applied and lived.

Encoding/Decoding and Codes

Messages are encoded using signs and codes, which are part of the “syntagmatic chain of
discourse.” Decoding happens when audiences interpret these signs within their own cultural
contexts. Hall emphasizes that discourse structures reality, and that language is the medium
through which reality is represented, not reality itself.

Denotation vs. Connotation

Hall distinguishes:

Denotation: Literal, fixed meaning.

Connotation: Associative, fluid meanings shaped by codes.

Almost all communication includes both. Dominant cultural codes create “preferred meanings,”
and naturalized codes appear “transparent,” seeming like accurate representations of reality.

Three Decoding Positions

Hall outlines three audience responses:

1. Dominant-Hegemonic: Full agreement with the encoded message.

2. Negotiated: General agreement, but with localized or personal reinterpretation.

3. Oppositional: Complete rejection and reinterpretation through an alternative framework.

These positions explain how audiences might accept, adapt, or resist media messages based
on their social context.
---

You might also like