By: Tok Evan
Student ID: 2403043
Date of Entry:15 July 2025
Entry 1 – Introduction Phase (Week 2–3 START Trimester)
What was my experience:
The start of the module introduced me to a new way of working—collaborating across
disciplines. The focus was not just on solving problems, but doing so in a socially meaningful
way. We were grouped with peers from different specializations—my team includes students
from EPE, MDME, and CE. Early on, I realized that communication and coordination would be
key challenges. As the most outgoing team member, I naturally took on the role of leading our
fieldwork, especially interviewing the community to identify their concerns.
What went well:
My team was open-minded and respectful from the beginning. We set up a shared document
and began brainstorming ideas almost immediately.
What didn’t go so well:
Scheduling meetings was tough due to different class and lab timings. I was worried about how
we’d manage this over time.
What I learned:
This module would demand not just technical skill, but empathy, communication, and
adaptability. I had to learn how to be more patient and plan around others’ availability—essential
skills in any professional setting.
Entry 2 – Ideation Phase (Week 7–8 START Trimester)
What was my experience:
Our team decided to craft our own problem statement: helping older professionals share
knowledge with fresh graduates. We wanted to address the disconnection between generations
and bridge the gap through storytelling and mentorship.
What went well:
We were aligned on our vision and split responsibilities early. I handled interview planning,
while others worked on design and technical solutions. We also committed to completing the
project within the trimester, despite the tight timeline.
What didn’t go so well:
With exams and overseas internships (OIP) approaching, time management became a major
challenge. We had to communicate even more clearly to avoid delays.
What I learned:
Project planning needs to include contingency for personal schedules. This phase also taught
me to articulate ideas more clearly, especially across disciplines.
Entry 3 – Creation Phase (Week 11–13 START Trimester)
What was my experience:
We moved into creation mode. I conducted interviews and gathered feedback from both older
adults and youth. We began designing an app that connects the two groups based on interests
and professional fields.
What went well:
We completed our data collection on time. The interviews provided great insights, some of
which validated our assumptions.
What didn’t go so well:
Translating interviews into actionable app features was harder than expected. Everyone
interpreted the insights differently, so we had to hold additional meetings to align our
understanding.
What I learned:
Effective analysis of qualitative data requires not only good listening but group consensus. I
also saw the value of empathy in understanding social issues—it wasn’t just about solving
problems but connecting to real people.
Entry 4 – Consolidation Phase (Week 3–5 COMPLETION Trimester)
What was my experience:
We began compiling our findings into an A1 poster and started editing the final presentation
video. Most tasks were complete except for integrating interview insights.
What went well:
Our teamwork had improved significantly. Everyone knew their responsibilities and kept each
other updated. The visual layout of the poster was engaging, and the video had a clear
narrative.
What didn’t go so well:
We had some difficulty shortening our insights to fit the poster without losing meaning. Also,
syncing the video editing with script revisions was time-consuming.
What I learned:
Good design is about clarity and focus. We had to decide what really mattered and present it in
a way that made sense quickly to others.
Entry 5 – Review Phase (Week 10–12 COMPLETION Trimester)
What was my experience:
Looking back, this project has been a journey of personal and professional growth. Working
with a multidisciplinary team taught me patience, negotiation, and the importance of shared
goals.
What went well:
Our team became more self-managed as the weeks went by. We didn’t need a leader
micromanaging—everyone took initiative.
What didn’t go so well:
In hindsight, we could have documented our progress more consistently. Some insights were
almost lost because we didn’t note them down right away.
What I learned and how I’ve grown:
I now understand that leadership isn’t about being in charge but about facilitating collaboration.
I’ve become more confident in communicating across disciplines and more aware of the value of
social impact in engineering. If I could redo the module, I would advocate for a shared timeline
earlier and more regular reflection check-ins.
Application to my future role:
As an aspiring engineer, I now see my role not only as a problem solver but as a social
innovator. To truly make a difference, I need to work with others—from diverse
backgrounds—and stay grounded in community needs. This module reminded me that
innovation isn’t just about technology, but about people.
Let me know if you'd like this in a Word or PDF format for submission.
1.
