Contents

1.0 BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................3

QUESTION 1: ANALYSIS OF FIVE SUPPLY CHAIN RISKS THAT FFL SHOULD HAVE
CONSIDERED WHEN IMPLEMENTING ITS NEW SUPPLY CHAIN PLANNING
PROCESS........................................................................................................................................4

1.1 SUPPLY CHAIN RISKS..........................................................................................................4

1.1.1 Demand Forecasting Errors................................................................................................4

1.1.2. Supplier Reliability and Compliance.................................................................................4

1.1.3. Supply Chain Disruptions..................................................................................................5

1.1.4. Technological Failures (Data Quality and Integration Issues)..........................................5

1.1.5. Resistance to Change.........................................................................................................6

1.2 CONCLUSION..........................................................................................................................6

QUESTION 2A: RECOGNISED APPROACHES, IN WHICH FFL MIGHT SEGMENT ITS

CUSTOMERS AND SEGMENT ITS SUPPLIERS TO ACHIEVE ITS OBJECTIVES...............7

2.1 CUSTOMER SEGMENTATION APPROACHES..................................................................7

2.1.1 Demographic Segmentation................................................................................................7

2.1.2 Behavioral Segmentation....................................................................................................7

2.1.3. Psychographic Segmentation.............................................................................................7

2.2 SUPPLIER SEGMENTATION APPROACHES......................................................................8

2.2.1 Capability-Based Segmentation..........................................................................................8

2.2.2 Risk Assessment Segmentation..........................................................................................8

2.2.3 Performance-Based Segmentation......................................................................................8

QUESTION 2B: UTILIZING CUSTOMER AND SUPPLIER SEGMENTATION OUTCOMES

IN STRATEGIC SUPPLY CHAIN DESIGN FOR FFL................................................................9
QUESTION 3: ANALYSIS OF THREE APPROACHES WHICH COULD HAVE BEEN
USED BY FFL TO MEASURE ITS SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE TO IMPROVE THE
EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS.......................................................................................10

1. THE BALANCED SCORECARD (BSC).............................................................................10

2. BENCHMARKING...............................................................................................................12

3. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs)....................................................................13

4.1 KEY FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED...............................................................................14

4.1.1 Geographic Coverage.......................................................................................................14

4.1.2 Inventory Management.....................................................................................................14

4.1.3 Technology Integration.....................................................................................................15

4.2 SOCIAL FACTORS................................................................................................................15

1. Consumer Preferences........................................................................................................15

4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS............................................................................................16

1. Sustainability Initiatives.....................................................................................................16

2. Regulatory Compliance......................................................................................................16

REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................17
1.0 BACKGROUND
In the current dynamic business landscape, proficient supply chain management (SCM) is

crucial for organisations aiming to improve operational efficiency and satisfy customer needs

(Kumar & Singh, 2021). The formulation and execution of a resilient supply chain strategy can

profoundly impact a company's competitive edge, especially in sectors marked by swift shifts in

consumer tastes and technology progress (Chae, 2020). Recent studies highlight that an

effectively organised supply chain not only elevates service levels but also diminishes costs and

boosts overall performance.

Freedom Furniture Limited (FFL), an international retailer focused on modern furniture and

accessories, illustrates the obstacles and opportunities encountered by firms in supply chain

management. As FFL traverses a multifaceted global marketplace, it must evaluate numerous

variables in its distribution system architecture, including geographic coverage, inventory

management, and supplier relationships. The incorporation of technology and sustainable

practices into supply chain operations is becoming increasingly vital, as consumers seek

enhanced transparency and accountability from brands.

Furthermore, social and environmental issues significantly influence supply chain strategy. The

increasing focus on corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability necessitates

that organisations such as FFL modify their processes to conform to consumer expectations and

legal mandates. This evaluation will examine the principal elements of FFL's distribution

system design and investigate the influence of social and environmental issues on its supply

chain operations.

QUESTION 1: ANALYSIS OF FIVE SUPPLY CHAIN RISKS THAT FFL SHOULD

HAVE CONSIDERED WHEN IMPLEMENTING ITS NEW SUPPLY CHAIN
PLANNING PROCESS.
Within the framework of FFL, a worldwide purveyor of furniture and accessories, the

introduction of a novel supply chain planning process entails numerous risks that could

profoundly affect business performance. In establishing its new supply chain planning process,

FFL should have evaluated five supply chain risks, each capable of affecting business

performance. This section examines and delineates five significant supply chain risks and

explores their potential ramifications for FFL.

1.1 SUPPLY CHAIN RISKS

1.1.1 Demand Forecasting Errors
Risk Description: One of the primary risks faced by FFL is erroneous demand forecasts. FFL's

supply chain is significantly dependent on projections; thus, any inconsistencies may result in

stock-outs or excess inventory. Inaccurate demand forecasts may result in surplus inventory or

supply shortages. FFL's supply chain is significantly dependent on projections, and any

deviations can impede operations.

Potential Impact: This risk may result in lost sales opportunities due to stock-outs, negatively

affecting consumer satisfaction and brand loyalty, and heightened holding costs linked to

surplus inventory (Naqvi et al., 2020). Moreover, erroneous predictions might result in

suboptimal resource distribution, thereby impacting overall operating efficiency (Ellinger et al.,

2012).

1.1.2. Supplier Reliability and Compliance

Risk Description: FFL's vast supplier network presents issues about supplier dependability and

adherence to sustainability norms. FFL procures products from a varied array of suppliers

throughout numerous nations. Inconsistency in supplier performance might present considerable

concerns. Failure to adhere to established rules of practice may result in reputational harm and

possible legal consequences (Segura & Álvarez, 2017).

Potential Impact: The consequences of unreliable suppliers might result in delays in product

availability, hence hindering FFL's capacity to satisfy customer demand and sustain competitive

price (Guo et al., 2016). The cessation of contracts with non-compliant vendors may result in

supply shortages and heightened expenses related to sourcing and integrating new suppliers

(Neumüller et al., 2016).

1.1.3. Supply Chain Disruptions

Risk Description: Global supply chains are vulnerable to several interruptions, such as

geopolitical conflicts, natural calamities, and pandemics. For FFL, such disruptions might

significantly hinder the movement of goods from suppliers to distribution centres and

eventually to retail outlets (Ndinda, 2017).

Potential Impact: Possible repercussions encompass postponed deliveries, heightened

transportation expenses, and an incapacity to satisfy consumer demand, perhaps resulting in

diminished sales and erosion of client trust (Rius-Sorolla et al., 2020). The COVID-19

pandemic has demonstrated the rapid impact on supply chains, highlighting the necessity for

comprehensive contingency planning (Hines, 2012).

1.1.4. Technological Failures (Data Quality and Integration Issues)

Risk Description: The revised planning procedure at FFL is predominantly based on data-

driven decision-making. The adoption of sophisticated software and centralised planning

systems creates dependence on technology for data management and decision-making.

Nonetheless, inadequate data quality or integration challenges among disparate systems can

result in erroneous decision-making and inefficient supply chain management (Hoek, 2020).
Potential Impact: This risk results in ineffective inventory management, a discrepancy

between supply and demand, and heightened operational expenses stemming from the necessity

for human corrections and modifications (Crowe et al., 2010). Moreover, fragmented data can

obstruct the attainment of a comprehensive perspective of the supply chain, affecting strategic

planning initiatives (Hilletofth, 2011).

1.1.5. Resistance to Change

Risk Description: Introducing a new supply chain planning approach frequently meets

opposition from staff familiar with current methodologies. FFL's shift from a functionally

orientated to a process-oriented organisation may encounter resistance from employees hesitant

to embrace new approaches (Melo & Alcântara, 2016).

Potential Impact: The potential consequences of this risk including implementation delays,

diminished morale, and an inability to attain the intended enhancements in efficiency and

effectiveness. If employees do not adopt the new processes, FFL may encounter difficulties in

achieving the whole advantages of its supply chain transformation (Rezaei & Lajimi, 2018).

1.2 CONCLUSION
FFL must meticulously evaluate these supply chain risks when executing its new planning

approach. By proactively mitigating demand forecasting inaccuracies, assuring supplier

dependability, preparing for probable disruptions, preserving data integrity, and managing

opposition to change, FFL may improve its supply chain efficacy and attain its strategic goals.

QUESTION 2A: RECOGNISED APPROACHES, IN WHICH FFL MIGHT SEGMENT

ITS CUSTOMERS AND SEGMENT ITS SUPPLIERS TO ACHIEVE ITS

OBJECTIVES.

FFL can employ numerous established methods for segmenting customers and suppliers to

attain its aims. These segmentation techniques can assist FFL in customising its offerings and

enhancing its supply chain processes.

2.1 CUSTOMER SEGMENTATION APPROACHES

2.1.1 Demographic Segmentation
FFL can categorise its consumers according to demographic variables including age, income,

family size, and geographic region. For example, families with children may have distinct

furniture requirements compared to young professionals or retirees. This segmentation enables

FFL to customise its product offerings and marketing tactics efficiently (Naqvi et al., 2020).

2.1.2 Behavioral Segmentation

Customers are categorised by purchasing behaviour, such as frequency, brand loyalty, and

product consumption. FFL can detect high-end and budget-conscious customer segments by

analysing buying habits. This data can inform inventory and promotional activities (Tang et al.,

2017). Frequent purchasers may receive loyalty programs or unique discounts, while occasional

buyers may receive promos to promote repeat purchases.

2.1.3. Psychographic Segmentation

FFL can categorise customers by lifestyle, values, and personality. Environmentally aware

consumers may prefer sustainable furniture. FFL may tailor marketing campaigns to client

values by understanding these psychographic characteristics (Ellinger et al., 2012).

2.2 SUPPLIER SEGMENTATION APPROACHES

2.2.1 Capability-Based Segmentation
FFL can classify suppliers by manufacturing, technology, and quality assurance. Segmentation

enables FFL to select suppliers that meet product quality and delivery requirements (Segura &

Álvarez, 2017).

2.2.2 Risk Assessment Segmentation

Supplier risk profiles might include financial stability, sustainability, and geopolitical threats.

This strategy enables FFL to prioritise low-risk suppliers and implement mitigation plans for

higher-risk partners (Dolšak et al., 2020).

2.2.3 Performance-Based Segmentation

FFL can assess suppliers according to their previous performance data, encompassing on-time

delivery rates, product quality, and responsiveness to concerns. This division allows FFL to

concentrate on establishing strategic alliances with high-performing suppliers while resolving

performance issues with others (Matshabaphala & Grobler, 2021).

QUESTION 2B: UTILIZING CUSTOMER AND SUPPLIER SEGMENTATION

OUTCOMES IN STRATEGIC SUPPLY CHAIN DESIGN FOR FFL
FFL can utilise the results of customer and supplier segmentation analyses to improve its

strategic supply chain configuration. By synchronising its supply chain processes with the

distinct requirements of various client segments and the competencies of its suppliers, FFL can

enhance efficiency, responsiveness, and overall customer happiness.

1. Tailored Product Offerings

By segmenting customers (e.g., young families, environmentally sensitive consumers), FFL can
personalise its products to their tastes. FFL can tailor its supply chain to environmentally

concerned clients by prioritising sustainable materials and goods (Lajimi et al., 2021).

These segments can inform FFL's sourcing and stocking strategies. If many of its customers are

environmentally sensitive, FFL can prioritise suppliers of sustainable materials and goods. This

aligns products with customer values, increasing brand loyalty and revenue.

2. Optimized Supplier Relationships

Supplier segmentation enables FFL to establish distinct strategies for managing supplier

relationships. FFL can forge long-term contracts with high-capability suppliers to guarantee

reliability, but it may impose stricter performance monitoring and support programs for lower-

capability vendors to improve their competencies (Melo & Alcântara, 2016).

3. Efficient Inventory Management

Comprehending client purchasing behaviour allows FFL to execute more precise demand

forecasting and inventory management strategies. By synchronising inventory levels with

the distinct requirements of various client segments, FFL can minimise stock-outs and

surplus inventory, hence enhancing operational efficiency (Guo et al., 2016).

4. Enhanced Responsiveness

By categorising suppliers according to risk and performance, FFL may establish a more

adaptable supply chain that is more capable of addressing interruptions. For instance, a

combination of low-risk and high-risk vendors enables FFL to sustain sourcing flexibility

while guaranteeing the availability of essential components (Crowe et al., 2010).

QUESTION 3: ANALYSIS OF THREE APPROACHES WHICH COULD HAVE BEEN

USED BY FFL TO MEASURE ITS SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE TO IMPROVE
THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS
As a global retailer of cutting-edge furniture and accessories, FFL must consistently enhance its

supply chain performance to sustain competitiveness and fulfil client needs. Implementing a

Balanced Scorecard (BSC), benchmarking, and Key Performance Indicators (KPI) techniques

can furnish FFL with a systematic methodology to assess and improve the efficiency and

effectiveness of its supply chain activities.

1. THE BALANCED SCORECARD (BSC)

The Balanced Scorecard is a strategic management instrument that enables organisations to

assess their performance from various aspects, including financial, customer, internal processes,

and learning and growth. For FFL, the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) can be customised to

concentrate explicitly on supply chain performance by including pertinent indicators across

these four dimensions:

a. Financial Perspective: This comprises supply chain costs, inventory turnover, and

supply chain ROI. FFL tracks these financial variables to evaluate its supply chain

operations and identify cost-cutting opportunities (Verdecho et al., 2020).

b. Customer Perspective: Customer satisfaction, order fulfilment, and delivery lead times

are examples. FFL can guarantee its supply chain meets customer expectations and

market demands by measuring these metrics (Ikasari et al., 2019).

c. Internal Process Perspective: This perspective emphasises supply chain efficiency,

including order processing, production cycle durations, and adaptability. These

measurements help FFL detect bottlenecks and streamline operations, improving supply

chain performance (Soni & Kodali, 2010).

d. Learning and Growth Perspective: This covers supply chain innovation, information

exchange, and staff training measures. FFL can strengthen its supply chain and react to

changing market conditions by promoting continuous improvement and learning

(Acquaye et al., 2014).

2. BENCHMARKING
Benchmarking is a systematic process of comparing an organization's performance metrics with

those of industry leaders or best practices. For FFL, benchmarking can be utilized in the

following ways:

a. Internal Benchmarking: FFL can evaluate its supply chain efficacy across several

locations, product categories, or distribution facilities. By recognising optimal practices

within its operations, FFL can facilitate knowledge dissemination and ongoing

enhancement within the organisation (Soni & Kodali, 2010).

b. External Benchmarking: FFL can benchmark its supply chain against competitors and

leaders. KPIs including delivery times, inventory levels, and customer service are

analysed. FFL can detect gaps and enhancement opportunities by comparing itself to

peers (Yakovleva et al., 2012).

c. Sustainability Benchmarking: Given the growing importance of sustainability in

supply chain management, FFL can compare its environmental performance to industry

norms. Measure carbon emissions, waste reduction, and resource efficiency. FFL can

improve its brand reputation and satisfy environmentally sensitive customers by

embracing sustainability best practises (Acquaye et al., 2014).

3. KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPIs)

Establishing a collection of KPIs customised for certain supply chain goals might yield

quantifiable insights into performance. Prevalent key performance indicators encompass

order fulfilment rates, inventory turnover, and lead times. Key Performance Indicators

(KPIs) enable organisations to monitor advancement towards strategic objectives and

pinpoint areas for enhancement, thereby promoting improved decision-making and

operational efficacy. FFL must identify key performance indicators that correspond with its

strategic goals. Common key performance indicators in supply chain management

encompass order fulfilment cycle time, inventory turnover ratio, perfect order rate, and

supply chain cost as a percentage of revenue, among others.

In summary, FFL may proficiently employ the Balanced Scorecard, Key Performance

Indicators, and benchmarking as synergistic instruments to assess and improve its supply chain

performance. By implementing a holistic strategy for performance evaluation and consistently

benchmarking its operations against industry standards, FFL may enhance the efficiency and

efficacy of its supply chain, resulting in increased customer satisfaction and competitive

advantage.

QUESTION 4A: ANALYSIS OF THE KEY FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED BY FFL

IN THE DESIGN OF ITS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

When designing its distribution system as part of its overall supply chain management strategy,
Freedom Furniture Limited (FFL) must consider several key factors to ensure efficiency,

responsiveness, and customer satisfaction. Below are the critical factors along with examples

linked to FFL:

4.1 KEY FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED

4.1.1 Geographic Coverage

FFL must assess its retail store and distribution centre locations to optimise logistics and save

transportation expenses. Distribution routes are optimised by analysing regional client

demographics and purchasing trends (Ndinda, 2017).

FFL must strategically place 33 distribution centres (DCs) and 11 customer DCs to save

transportation costs and delivery times. Moving DCs closer to large markets can improve

service and minimise lead times.

4.1.2 Inventory Management

Distribution centres need good inventory management to keep stock levels high. For real-time

stock monitoring and replenishment, FFL should install advanced inventory tracking systems

(Rius-Sorolla et al., 2020).

FFL's supply chain has had stock-outs and overstocks due to fragmented planning. The case

study shows that FFL may better manage stock levels across its distribution network by

centralising forecasting and inventory control, ensuring that popular items are available when

needed without additional inventory expenses.

4.1.3 Technology Integration

The distribution system can be more efficient using technology. To improve distribution, FFL

could investigate automated warehousing and forecasting tools (Beck et al., 2012).

FFL's use of modern software for centralised planning and data quality enhancement shows

how technology improves distribution efficiency. This connectivity improves supply chain
insight, enabling quick decisions and market responsiveness.

QUESTION 4B: HOW SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS MIGHT

IMPACT ON THE FFL SUPPLY CHAIN

Social and environmental factors can significantly impact FFL's supply chain in various ways:

4.2 SOCIAL FACTORS

1. Consumer Preferences
FFL must change its supply chain to suit consumer expectations for fair labour and ethical

sourcing as they grow more conscious of social issues. FFL responds to consumer demand for

ethically based products by practicing responsible forestry management and sustainability.

Supplier training in responsible forest management boosts FFL's brand and customer loyalty.

2. Cultural Relevance

FFL's brand revamp and cultural relevance demonstrate the value of local markets. FFL can

boost its market share by tapping into the cultural mood and catering to local tastes. A flexible

supply chain that can quickly respond to societal and consumer changes is needed.

4.3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

1. Sustainability Initiatives
FFL has taken environmental issues seriously with programs like the Sustainability Product

Score Card established in FY2010. This scorecard assesses items' environmental impact from

raw material procurement to recycling. These strategies lower FFL's carbon footprint and attract

eco-conscious customers.

2. Regulatory Compliance
Globally tighter environmental rules affect FFL's supplier network. FFL's investment in

renewable energy and waste management, such as retail store recycling, shows its
environmental dedication. This reduces non-compliance risks and establishes FFL as an

industry sustainability leader.

Conclusion

Social considerations like consumer preferences and cultural relevance and environmental

issues like sustainability and regulatory compliance affect FFL's supply chain. FFL can improve

operational efficiency, brand perception, and customer loyalty by addressing these factors.

REFERENCES
Carter, C. R., & Easton, P. L. (2019). Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Review of the

Literature. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(5), 456-

478.

Chae, B. (2020). Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Approach. Journal of Supply

Chain Management, 56(2), 45-60.

Ellinger, A., Shin, H., Northington, W., Adams, F., Hofman, D., & O'Marah, K. (2012). The

influence of supply chain management competency on customer satisfaction and shareholder

value. Supply Chain Management an International Journal, 17(3), 249-262.

Guo, R., Lee, H., & Swinney, R. (2016). Responsible sourcing in supply chains. Management

Science, 62(9), 2722-2744.

Hoek, R. (2020). Responding to covid-19 supply chain risks—insights from supply chain change

management, total cost of ownership and supplier segmentation theory. Logistics, 4(4), 23.

Kumar, S., & Singh, R. (2021). The Role of Technology in Supply Chain Management.

International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(3), 789-805.

Lee, H. L. (2022). Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Trends and Challenges.

Sustainability, 14(1), 123-135.

Naqvi, M., Asim, M., & Manzoor, S. (2020). Analysing the impact of supply chain agility on

customer satisfaction through responsiveness and innovation. Cenraps Journal of Social

Sciences, 2(1), 26-40.

Neumüller, C., Lasch, R., & Kellner, F. (2016). Integrating sustainability into strategic supplier

portfolio selection. Management Decision, 54(1), 194-221.

Rezaei, J. & Lajimi, H. (2018). Segmenting supplies and suppliers: bringing together the

purchasing portfolio matrix and the supplier potential matrix. International Journal of Logistics

Research and Applications, 22(4), 419-436.

Rius-Sorolla, G., Miguel, S., & Rueda‐Armengot, C. (2020). Multivariable supplier

segmentation in sustainable supply chain management. Sustainability, 12(11), 4556.

Segura, M. & Álvarez, C. (2017). A multiple criteria supplier segmentation using outranking and

value function methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 69, 87-100.

Zhao, X., & Huo, B. (2023). Consumer Preferences and Supply Chain Responsiveness. Journal

of Business Research, 145, 456-467.