Comprehensive Personality Analysis Report
Client Name: Mujahid
Age: 20 years
Educational Qualification: [Link]. (Biology)
Assessment Tool: House-Tree-Person (HTP), TAT ,RISB Test
Goal: Aspires to join Pakistan Air Force as a GD Pilot
Background Information
Mujahid is a 20-year-old male with a science background ([Link]. Biology). He comes
from a rural agricultural family—his parents are farmers, while his elder brother serves in
the Air Force as an Airman. Mujahid has completed his education exclusively in boys-
only institutions, except for a short stint (3–4 months) at a co-educational academy. He
reported not having any close friends and demonstrates limited social engagement. He
avoids conversations on romantic or sexual topics and states he has no interest in such
matters, asserting that he maintains self-control. Despite this, he expresses a desire to get
married, hinting at traditional values and expected life milestones.
When asked about his long-term and short-term goals, he was unable to articulate a
structured or step-by-step plan. The only ambition he firmly stated was a desire to help
his parents and to join the Air Force out of patriotism. However, there is no concrete past
evidence or contribution towards national or civic service. His loyalty towards the
military was apparent in political discussions where he defended the actions of the armed
forces, even in potentially controversial situations. Interestingly, when presented with a
scenario of his sister eloping, he expressed support for her decision, indicating
contradictory personal values or an overcontrolled defense mechanism.
HTP Test Interpretation
House Drawing:
Mujahid’s house drawing lacked detail and emotional warmth. The structure appeared
standard and closed, with minimal openness (e.g., small windows, no pathway, or
welcoming elements). This reflects emotional reservation, a guarded personality, and
difficulty expressing intimacy or personal needs. The rigid lines may signify inner
tension and the desire for order and structure, aligning with his aspiration for military life.
Tree Drawing:
The tree was stiff and mechanical, with thin or shallow roots, suggesting a weak
connection with emotional grounding or nurturing experiences. The branches were
limited or sharply angled, implying restricted emotional expression and limited reach in
relationships. It could also represent constrained personal growth and unfulfilled
emotional development. The focus on the trunk over leaves or fruits points toward
dependency on physical strength or duty over emotional fulfillment.
Person Drawing:
The person depicted lacked facial features or showed signs of stiffness, suggesting
identity confusion, low self-exploration, or a tendency to suppress individual desires. The
figure was not expressive, indicating a strong defensive attitude and unwillingness to be
vulnerable. This aligns with Mujahid’s verbal responses that were often defensive or
dismissive when asked about sensitive topics.
RISB (Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank) Interpretation
Mujahid’s responses on the Rotter Incomplete Sentences Blank (RISB) reveal a
predominantly positive and socially desirable attitude toward life, family, future, and self-
perception. The tone of his sentences reflects maturity, responsibility, and idealism,
indicating a well-developed persona that aligns with moral and religious values.
Most of his responses are constructed in a manner that suggests an intention to portray
himself favorably, possibly due to an internalized pressure to appear emotionally resilient
and morally sound. This is especially noticeable in statements reflecting religious desires,
highlighting not only religiosity but also an attempt to align his identity with socially
admired roles.
Furthermore, some responses seem designed to manipulate the image he presents in a
subtle way—what psychologists might recognize as secondary gain behavior. The client
appears to use positivity to mask emotional struggles, which can be understood as a
defense mechanism. However, one or two sentences reveal minor psychological tension,
such as difficulty in allocating time for himself, indicating underlying stress or emotional
burden.
Overall, Mujahid’s RISB profile points toward:
High social desirability
Suppressed emotional content
Minimal self-disclosure of vulnerabilities
Use of idealized or religious constructs as a defense
Strong elements of impression management and persona
TAT (Thematic Apperception Test) Interpretation
Mujahid’s TAT stories reveal consistent themes of responsibility, planning,
structure, and success, often involving idealized family or professional situations.
In most narratives, characters resolve challenges smoothly through discipline,
guidance from elders, or mutual understanding—avoiding emotional distress or
internal conflict.
For example, in one story, a mother (Hajra) and her son (Akbar) are shown
discussing business responsibilities in a highly structured and respectful manner.
The son listens to his mother’s advice, successfully executes her guidance, and
handles a business meeting with competence. This narrative reflects obedience,
stability, and goal-oriented action, leaving little room for ambiguity, uncertainty,
or failure.
In another story, a girl named Sara is shown preparing for exams with extreme
dedication. Her structured routine, time management, and eventual success reflect
perfectionistic traits and academic idealism. Similarly, in a story about two long-
lost friends (Ali and Shahzaib), the focus remains on reconnecting, planning the
future, and discussing professional achievements—again reflecting structured
thinking, social bonding, and responsibility.
Interestingly, in images that may elicit confusion, sadness, or distress, Mujahid
instead offers opposite responses—showing peaceful environments, stable
relationships, or purposeful planning. This suggests emotional inhibition, conflict
avoidance, and reliance on social scripts, instead of emotionally rich or
psychologically complex storytelling.
Overall, his TAT narratives highlight:
Overuse of structured and idealized scenarios
Lack of emotional depth or psychological conflict
Defensive storytelling aimed at projecting stability and control
High persona indicating polished, morally-inclined self-image
Suppression of vulnerability or impulsive elements
Result :
Thinking Patterns and Style
Mujahid demonstrates a highly structured, linear, and concrete thinking style,
emphasizing logic, planning, and duty. There is limited evidence of abstract or
symbolic thinking in his projective responses.
Critical Thinking: Mildly present, though heavily filtered through a moral and
structured lens. He tends to avoid ambiguity or emotionally ambiguous situations.
Convergent Thinking: Strong, as reflected in problem-solving, goal-setting, and
rule-following behaviors.
Divergent or Creative Thinking: Less evident. Most narratives lack imaginative
elements, metaphors, or emotionally symbolic content.
Ego Strength
Mujahid appears to possess moderate ego strength. He shows:
Adequate frustration tolerance (managing delayed gratification and rules)
Stability under pressure (especially in structured scenarios)
Goal orientation and self-discipline
However, his ego strength seems dependent on external validation and social
scripting. He may struggle in ambiguous or emotionally charged situations,
especially where there is no clear structure or authority figure.
Signs of ego defense mechanisms such as:
Denial (of emotional distress)
Intellectualization (processing emotional matters through rational frames)
Idealization (of self and others)
These defenses reinforce his persona and block deeper emotional integration,
which therapy should aim to gradually reduce.
Rigid Thinking Patterns: Present in repeated themes of control, success, order,
and discipline.
Personality Conflicts and Traits
1. Defensive Orientation: Mujahid frequently uses intellectualization and denial
as defense mechanisms. He avoids discussing sexual, emotional, or personal
issues, instead projecting a controlled and idealized self-image.
2. Rigid Thinking Patterns: His approach to goals and morality reflects rigid
black-and-white thinking. He supports institutional authority (e.g., military)
uncritically but simultaneously shows inconsistency in personal values (e.g.,
supporting a sister’s elopement).
3. Emotional Suppression: The absence of open emotional expression—both in
projective drawings and interviews—suggests suppression or discomfort with
emotional intimacy.
4. Identity Diffusion: A lack of well-formed short- and long-term goals, and
unclear self-concept point towards ongoing identity development, typical of
late adolescence, but concerning in a candidate for structured roles like GD
Pilot.
Despite Mujahid’s effort to project a composed and morally sound personality,
there appear to be internal conflicts between his ideal self and his real emotional
experience. He seems to carry an inner dissonance between his authentic
emotions and the image he believes he must maintain. This is particularly evident
in his high defensiveness, suppression of emotional content, and use of structured,
conflict-free narratives in both TAT and RISB.
His behavior suggests a dominant Persona, as conceptualized by Carl Jung — a
socially acceptable mask used to navigate external expectations. The emphasis on
morality, duty, and structure, coupled with avoidance of vulnerability, points to
repressed emotional layers. This internal split may hinder genuine self-
expression, especially in personal or emotionally demanding situations.
Detailed and tailored expanded recommendation section that focuses on Mujahid’s
personality development, psychological growth, and behavioral alignment—with the
ultimate goal of increasing his suitability and readiness for Air Force GD Pilot selection.
These recommendations are structured in a way that even if there’s a delay in selection,
he can work on transforming himself for better chances in the future:
Expanded Recommendations for Personality Development and Air Force Readiness
1. Long-Term Personality Restructuring through Psychotherapy: Mujahid should
engage in structured psychotherapeutic intervention with a focus on reducing
excessive defensiveness, rigid persona presentation, and over-reliance on
idealized self-image. This would involve:
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) to restructure maladaptive beliefs like “I must
appear perfect to be accepted” or “I should never show weakness.”
Psychodynamic insight therapy to explore deeper unconscious conflicts and repressed
emotional content that may affect his interpersonal authenticity and self-awareness.
Reality Testing Exercises to enhance his ability to accept and integrate both strengths and
limitations of his personality.
2. Personality Flexibility and Ego Strength Building: His personality style currently
reflects a structured but overly defensive and perfectionist persona.
He must:
Learn to tolerate ambiguity and emotional discomfort through gradual exposure and
reflective journaling.
Develop ego strength by learning frustration tolerance, decision-making under stress, and
handling failures constructively.
Practice self-acceptance and emotional honesty—the Air Force demands internal
strength, not just external composure.
3. Social and Emotional Intelligence Development:
Enroll in group therapy or emotional intelligence training to improve sensitivity toward
others’ emotions, expressiveness, and the ability to maintain emotionally authentic
relationships.
Practice assertiveness and active listening techniques to reduce social withdrawal and
fear of vulnerability.
Attend mixed-gender academic or volunteering environments to reduce social anxiety
and build confidence around interpersonal dynamics, especially around authority figures
and peers from diverse backgrounds.
4. Critical Thinking and Decision-Making Training:
Participate in strategic simulation games, leadership workshops, and logic-based tasks
that enhance abstract reasoning, risk assessment, and critical thinking.
Maintain a reflection diary on weekly decision-making processes and consequences to
develop independent judgment.
Seek mentorship from seniors in the Air Force or cadet academies for real-world insight
and guided reflection.
5. Career Clarity through Structured Goal Mapping:
Work closely with a career counselor to develop a timeline of realistic goals, backup
options, and contingencies.
Identify alternative service or leadership roles (e.g., engineering corps, admin wing, or
ground duties) where his structured thinking and nationalistic passion can still be
valuable if GD Pilot is not viable.
Create measurable milestones: physical fitness, communication skills, knowledge of
military strategy, and team leadership performance.
6. Strengthening Authentic National Identity and Purpose:
Mujahid’s desire to serve the country should be grounded in realistic contributions and
civic involvement rather than idealized patriotism.
Encourage volunteering with social welfare or military cadet training programs to
translate intent into action and deepen emotional commitment to service.
Engage in critical discussions about national challenges to build a balanced, well-
informed perspective about the military's role and responsibilities in civil society.
7. Follow-Up and Re-Evaluation:
A psychological reassessment every 6–8 months using 16PF, MBTI, and Emotional
Quotient Inventories is recommended to monitor progress.
Maintain a personal development portfolio documenting emotional growth, behavioral
milestones, and reflective writing to demonstrate change in future selection interviews.
Conclusion:
Mujahid has the foundational traits of discipline, motivation, and structured thinking.
However, to truly become a resilient, adaptive, and emotionally grounded leader suitable
for the Air Force, especially as a GD Pilot, he must commit to long-term personality
enhancement. A well-balanced self, grounded in authenticity, empathy, and mission-
oriented flexibility, will elevate not only his candidacy but also his future effectiveness as
a service member.
Sami Ullah Khan
Clinical Psychologist
CBT,DBT therapist
Personality Assessment
0317-5178509
logicspsy@[Link]
