Scribd
Upload
216 views1 page

Title Proposal Evaluation Criteria Rubric

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating research title proposals based on five criteria: Proposal Title, Purpose and Research Type, Currency, Importance and Appropriateness of Topic to Society, and Focus and Organization of Content. Each criterion is rated on a scale from Poor to Excellent, providing specific descriptions for each level of performance. The rubric aims to guide evaluators in assessing the quality and relevance of research proposals.

Uploaded by

Bee Viajedor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
216 views1 page

Title Proposal Evaluation Criteria Rubric

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating research title proposals based on five criteria: Proposal Title, Purpose and Research Type, Currency, Importance and Appropriateness of Topic to Society, and Focus and Organization of Content. Each criterion is rated on a scale from Poor to Excellent, providing specific descriptions for each level of performance. The rubric aims to guide evaluators in assessing the quality and relevance of research proposals.

Uploaded by

Bee Viajedor
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Year Level & Section: ____________________________________________ Group No.

__________________

TITLE PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA RUBRIC

RESEARCH TITLE:

Evaluation Poor Fair Satisfactory Good Excellent SCORE


Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Proposal Title The title gives little The title has some The title generally The title clearly The title gains the
information about the indication of the describes what the describes the reader’s interest,
research content. research content. research will be research. describes the
about. research.
Purpose and The proposal is The proposal may be The proposal is The proposal is The proposal matches
Research Type inappropriate for the appropriate for the generally appropriate appropriate for the the research type.
research type, or the research type. The for the research type. research type. The The objective is clear
objective is not objective is too The objective is objective is clear (stated or implied);
stated, implied, or general and how it stated or implied, but (stated or implied), there are specifics
cleared. will be achieved is not how it will be and it is clear how the that make the reader
explained. achieved is not presenter will attain want to learn more.
explained. it.
Currency, The topic is not The topic is The topic may not be The topic is current The topic is current,
Importance, and current or not somewhat related to current but focuses and appropriate to immediately relevant,
Appropriateness appropriate to the issues in the society, on issues in the the field and/or the or important to the
of Topic to the society. but it is not current. society. IS. I would probably field and the IS.
society attend this session.
Focus and The topic is not The topic’s focus is The organization may The proposal is The proposal is well-
Organization of focused or there is too narrow or too be understandable to focused and explains focused. It previews
Content (based little or no general. The proposal the audience, but the how the presenter the topic, presents
on the proposal organization to the shows some proposal could be will introduce and the material in an
type) proposal. organization, but it more focused and present the material interesting way, and
may not provide better organized. in a comprehensible shows how it will be
sufficient guidance way. conducted.
for the audience.
Brief Overall Comments:

You might also like