AOCS Ce1j - 07
AOCS Ce1j - 07
SCOPE
This method evaluates, by a single capillary GLC procedure, the levels of trans isomers, saturated fatty
acid (SFA), cis- and trans-monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA), and cis- and trans-polyunsaturated fatty
acid (PUFA) in fat samples where the source of the fat is unknown or is of dairy or ruminant origins. The
method is not designed to provide detailed definitive isomer composition that may be desired for nutritional
and/or biochemical purposes. To obtain more detailed isomeric composition information prior argentation
chromatographic separations and/or additional GC analyses are required. For nutritional labeling purposes
All rights reserved. No part of this method may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisher.
the total fat, saturated, cis-monounsaturated, cis-polyunsaturated and trans fatty acid contents are to be
determined. This method may also determine cis-polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), including arachidonic
acid (AA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA).
This method utilizes a triacylglycerol (13:0 TAG) internal standard (IS) for determining the concen-
tration of the individual fatty acids in the oil samples after methylation. The method is applicable to fats
derived from dairy and ruminant products. This method is not applicable to products containing mixtures
of both dairy and vegetable fats as the trans linolenic acid (18:3) isomers will coelute with the gondoic acid
(20:1) isomers. In that case both this method coupled with AOCS Ce 1h-05 would be required for analysis.
Conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) will be present in dairy and ruminant fats and may be quantitated with
this method, however for nutritional labeling purposes CLA are not included either as cis- or trans-PUFA
(References 1 and 2). There is minor co-elution of cis- and trans-fatty acid isomers, particularly in the 16:1,
17:1, and 18:1 regions, using this technique.
Theoretical Correction Factors (TCFs) are used to quantitate all saturated, monounsaturated, and poly-
unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) of 18 carbons. TCFs are also used for fatty acids, which lack pure standards.
Empirical Correction Factors (ECFs) are used for very long chain PUFA of 20 carbons or more and three or
more double bonds for which standards are readily available.
APPARATUS
1. Gas chromatograph: suitable for use with a capillary column equipped with:
(a) Thermostatic chamber for the capillary column, capable of maintaining the desired temperature to ± 0.1 °C.
(b) Temperature-controlled split mode injection unit.
(c) Flame-ionization detector (FID), amplifier, and electronic recorder-integrator.
2. Capillary column: Fused silica capillary 100 m, and 0.25 mm i.d., coated with SPTM-2560 or CP-SilTM 88,
100% cyanopropylsilicone stationary phase, to a thickness of 0.20 µm. Commercially prepared columns are avail-
able from: SPTM-2560 (Part Number 24056, Supelco, Inc. Bellefonte, PA, USA) and CP-SilTM 88 (Part Number
CP7489, Varian, Walnut Creek, CA, USA; Chrompack, Middleburg, The Netherlands).
3. Microsyringe for gas chromatography—10 µL delivery, with a hardened needle.
4. Carrier gas—hydrogen or helium, 99.99% pure or better, gas chromatography quality, dried, and oxygen removed
by suitable filters.1
5. Flame gases—hydrogen and air, gas chromatography quality.
6. Make-up gas—nitrogen or helium, gas chromatography quality.
7. Injection port split liner—4 mm i.d., 6.3 mm o.d. × 78.5 mm base deactivated precision (Focus) split liner with
glass wool (e.g., Catalog #21022-211.5, Restek; P/N 092002, SGE or equivalent).2
All rights reserved. No part of this method may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisher.
FAME in the mixture. This mixture (100 mg) is diluted in 5 mL of n-heptane or n-hexanes with a 5 mL Class
A volumetric pipette. The ampoule is rinsed with n-heptane or n-hexanes to ensure complete and homogenous
transfer of the mixture. The final concentration should be approximately 20 mg/mL. The fatty acid methyl esters
(FAMEs) standards in GLC-714 were those commercially available chosen to represent the majority of fatty acids
present in edible vegetable, dairy, and ruminant fats, marine and single cell oils. Included were the internal stan-
dards used in AOCS Ce 1h-05, AOCS Ce 1i-07, and AOCS Ce 1j-07.
PROCEDURE
1. Preparation of FAMEs:
(a) GLC-714—Analyze the 20 mg/mL preparation to determine ECFs.
(b) From oils and fats—Use a standard procedure for example, Alcoholysis (Reference 6), ISO 5509 (Reference 7),
or transmethylation (References 8 and 9). Prior to methylation, add enough IS solution to the reaction flask,
so that after the oil or fat is added, the concentration of the final solution is between 0.05 and 0.10 mg IS/mg
oil or fat (e.g., 5 mL of a 2 mg/mL TAG IS solution per 100 mg of oil).
(c) Dissolve the prepared FAME in n-hexanes or n-heptane, concentration should be approximately 15–20
mg/mL n-hexanes or n-heptane.
2. Chromatography
(a) Operating conditions are as follows:
Injection port temperature: 235 °C
Detector temperature: 325 °C
Oven temperature program: Isothermal at 180 °C (32 min) ramped at 20 °C/min to 215 °C (hold 31.25 min)
Carrier gas: hydrogen, constant flow rate 1.0 mL/min; 26 cm/s; 24.63 psi; split ratio, 100:1.
Carrier gas: helium; constant flow rate; flow rate 2.0 mL/min; 28 cm/s; 63.29 psi; split ratio, 100:1
(b) Inject 1 µL, which is equivalent to 15 to 20 µg of total FAMEs (Table 1 and Figs. 1–32).
(b) Resolution greater than 1.0 but less than 1.5 between 11c-20:1 and 9c,12c,15c-18:3 should be obtained
(Reference 11).
2. The Empirical Correction Factors (ECFs) are determined by analysis of GLC-714 at approximately 20 mg/mL
and plotted as the percent difference between the ECF and Theoretical Correction Factors (TCFs) divided by the
TCFs (Fig. 34). Fig. 34 shows the plots from four different laboratories. Different laboratories will most likely have
different plots and therefore should be determined for each laboratory. An example calculation follows:
ECFFAMEx − TCFFAMEx
% Difference = 100 ×
TCFFAME X
GLC-714 can also be used to help determine if a chromatographic system is operating properly. Operation under
the GC parameters listed in the method should result in a similar trend line with the long chain PUFA ECFs devi-
ating furthest from TCFs, while all saturated and monounsaturated FAME deviate from the TCFs the least. Ideally
if the % Difference is three or less for the saturated and monounsaturated FAME, then the GC system is considered
to be operating properly and TCFs can be used for those FAME. ECFs will need to be calculated and used for the
long chain PUFA (≥ 20 carbons and three double bonds). Fig. 33 shows the plot of three different methods AOCS
Ce 1h-05, Ce 1i-07, and Ce 1j-07 within one laboratory.
3. Peak identification—the individual FAMEs are identified by their retention times, which are compared with the
FAME reference standards and reference oils. The FAME reference oils are tallow and anhydrous butterfat. See
Figs. 2–11 and 18–27 for sample chromatograms of both. When peaks of unknown identity are observed, attempt
to identify such peaks using appropriate procedures that usually involve GC-MS, FTIR, silver-ion chromatography,
and classical chemical methods (References 12 and 13). Peaks of unknown identity should not be included in the
summation of peak areas when quantifying the concentrations of total fat, saturated, cis- or trans-monounsaturated,
All rights reserved. No part of this method may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisher.
cis- or trans-polyunsaturated, AA, EPA, or DHA, unless they have been confirmed to be fatty acids.
CALCULATIONS
1. Calculation of grams (g) of individual fatty acids and total fat per 100 g of sample:
The food labeling regulations in Canada (Reference 1) and the USA (Reference 2) define the total fat as the
sum of fatty acids originating from all the lipid classes present in the food matrix and is expressed as TAG equiva-
lents. This requires converting the GC measured FAMEs into TAG equivalents. The fatty acids listed in Tables
1 and 2 cover most of the fatty acid chain lengths (from 4:0 to 26:0) and double bonds (from 0 to 6) that are
encountered in dairy and ruminant fats. The factors for conversion of the individual FAMEs into TAG equivalents
are given in Table 3.
The food labeling regulations in Canada (Reference 1) and the USA (Reference 2) require mandatory declara-
tion of total fat and the amounts of saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and trans fatty acids. Declaration of the amounts
of cis-monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), n-6, and n-3 cis-polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) is not manda-
tory, however, they could be declared in the nutrition facts table on a voluntary basis. Furthermore, the amounts
of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) could also be declared on the label, but their values
should be displayed outside the nutrition fact table. For nutritional labeling purposes the total fat, saturated, cis-
monounsaturated, and cis-polyunsaturated fatty acid contents are to be determined with this method. For the
determination of vegetable oil fatty acid concentrations the AOCS Ce 1h-05 method is recommended. For the
determination of marine oil or single cell oils (SCOs) fatty acid concentrations the AOCS Ce 1i-07 method is
recommended. In contrast to total fat, fatty acids should be expressed as free fatty acids (FFAs). The factors for
conversion of the individual FAMEs into FFAs are given in Table 2.
(a) Calculate, the amount (in g) of individual fatty acids, expressed as FAME (WFAMEx) and TAG (WTAGx) equiva-
lents as follows.
A x × WTAG is × 1.0059 × R x
WFAMEx =
A is
Where Ax = area counts for fatty acid x; WTAG is = weight of 13:0 TAG IS (in g) added to the oils; Ais = peak
area counts of the IS; 1.0059, conversion of IS in sample;3 FTAGx = conversion factor for FAMEs to TAGs
for individual fatty acids (Table 3) and Rx = theoretical flame ionization detector correction factor (TCF) for
FAMEs relative to 13:0 FAME IS, respectively (Table 4)4 or the Empirical Correction Factor (ECF) as deter-
mined via GLC-714 (Table 4). TCF should be applied to the analytical data for optimum accuracy (References
14–16) and to minimize variation between laboratories because of differences in calculating response factors.
TCFs are also used for fatty acids where standards are not available. ECFs are needed due to the large deviation
from TCFs for long chain PUFA of 20 carbons or more and three or more double bonds. The TCFs and ECFs
of a number of FAMEs that are commonly encountered in dairy and ruminant fats are listed in Table 4. The
TCF were calculated using the following formula:
MWx
TCFx =
( N x − 1) × ( AWC ) × 1.4625
Where TCFx = theoretical flame ionization detector response factor for fatty acid x (as methyl ester) with
respect to 13:0 FAME IS; MWx = molecular weight of component x; Nx = number of carbon atoms in the
FAME of component x; AWC = atomic weight of carbon (12.011); 1.4625 = TCF for 13:0 FAME.5,6
ECFs are required for long chain PUFA FAME of 20 carbons or more and three or more double bonds of
which standards are readily available. The ECFs are calculated using the Certificate of Analysis (COA) sup-
plied with each lot of GLC-714 from Nu-Chek-Prep, Inc. The COA will list both the purity (P) and amount
(AmtFAMEx) of each FAME used to make up the standard. The actual amount (AAmtFAMEx) is calculated by
the following equation:
AAmtFAMEx = P × AmtFAMEx
The response factor (RF) for each peak is determined by the following equation:
RFFAMEx = AreaFAMEx/AAmtFAMEx
All rights reserved. No part of this method may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisher.
Each RF is then made relative to the 13:0 RF by the following equation:
RRFFAMEx = RFFAMEx/RF13:0
The Empirical Correction Factor (ECF) for each FAME is then calculated by the taking the inverse of the
RRF:
ECFFAMEx = 1/RRFFAMEx
(b) Calculate the amount of total fat in sample (sum of all fatty acids; expressed as TAGs) as follows:
Where WTAG = weight of the sum of all TAG, g and WTS = weight of test sample, g
(c) Calculate weight (in g) of each individual fatty acid (Wx) as follows:
Where WFAMEx = individual fatty acids expressed as FAME and FFAx = conversion factors for conversion of
FAME to their corresponding fatty acids (Table 3).
(d) Calculate weight of saturated fats (sum of all saturated fatty acids) as follows:
Where ∑Saturated Wx = sum of all saturated fatty acids (4:0; 5:0; 6:0; 7:0; 8:0; 9:0; 10:0; iso 10:0; 11:0; 12:0;
iso 12:0; 13:0; anteiso and iso 13:0; 14:0; iso 14:0; 15:0; anteiso and iso 15:0; 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl 15:0; 16:0;
iso 16:0; 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl 16:0; 17:0; anteiso and iso 17:0; 18:0; iso 18:0; 19:0; 20:0; iso 20:0; 21:0; iso
21:0; 22:0; 24:0; 25:0 and 26:0) and WTS = weight of sample, g
(e) Calculate weight of cis-monounsaturated fat, fatty acids containing one double bond, as follows:
Where ∑cis-monounsaturated Wx = sum of all cis-monounsaturated fatty acids (11:1; 14:1; 15:1; 16:1; 17:1;
18:1; 19:1; 20:1; 22:1; and 24:1) and WTS = weight of sample, g
Where total trans Wx = sum of all trans fatty acids excluding trans isomers with a conjugated double bond and
WTS = weight of sample, g
(g) Calculate weight of cis-polyunsaturated fat, fatty acids containing two or more double bonds, as follows:
Where ∑cis-polyunsaturated Wx = sum of all cis-polyunsaturated fatty acids (18:2; 18:3; 18:4; 20:2; 20:3;
20:4; 20:5; 22:2; 22:3; 22:4; 22:5; and 22:6).
Where ∑n-3 PUFAs Wx = sum of all n-3 PUFAs (9c,12c,15c-18:3; 6c,9c,12c,15c-18:4; 8c,11c,14c,17c-20:4;
5c,8c,11c,14c,17c-20:5; 7c,10c,13c,16c,19c-22:5 and 4c,7c,10c,13c,16c,19c 22:6) and WTS = weight of sam-
ple, g.
Where ∑n-6 PUFAs Wx = sum of all n-6 PUFAs (9c,12c-18:2; 6c,9c,12c-18:3; 8c,11c,14c-20:3;
5c,8c,11c,14c-20:4; 7c,10c,13c,16c-22:4; and 4c,7c,10c,13c,16c-22:5) and WTS = weight of sample, g.
PEAK IDENTIFICATION
Identification of the all the FAME components in complex matrices such as dairy and ruminant fats can be quite chal-
lenging. Identification of the peaks in this method has been done by running numerous standards such as; GLC-463
and GLC-714 (Nu-Chek Prep, Elysian, MN), Pamolyn 380 (Hercules, DE), as well as many other individual pure
standards available from a variety of different vendors. In addition, there have been a number of papers published that
use more detailed techniques like argentation chromatographic separations and/or additional GC analyses to separate
out and identify many of the different isomers (References 17–24). These papers all have excellent chromatograms that
were used to identify some of the more difficult peaks in the fats that have been analyzed in this method.
PRECISION
Precision data determined from a 2011 AOCS collaborative study by 9 laboratories analyzing 24 samples are given in
Table 5. Samples were prepared according to Ce 2b-11. Reproducibility and repeatability values are calculated according
to the AOAC/IUPAC Harmonized Protocol for Collaborative Study.
3. Proficiency test—For external reference the method is tested each year by participation in the AOCS Laboratory
Proficiency Program or any other suitable ring test.
NOTES
1 Nitrogen gas is not acceptable as a carrier gas for this method.
2 No other liner types (e.g., straight through, etc.) should be used with this method.
3 1.0059 is the factor for conversion of the weight of the IS (which is 13:0) from the TAG form to its corresponding
weight of the FAME form. In calculating the factor, hydrolysis (and transmethylation), TAG yields three moles of
FAME. So that the general formula for the conversion factor is as follows:
4 1.4625 is the theoretical flame ionization detector response correction factor (TCF) for 13:0 FAME. It is calculated as
follows.
Here Nx is the number of carbon atoms in 13:0 FAME, which is 14. 12.011 is the atomic weight of carbon.
All rights reserved. No part of this method may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisher.
5 It
is important to understand the difference (and hence the relationship) between TCF and TRF.
(a) Theoretical flame ionization response factor (TRF) is actually the proportion (with respect to the total weight,
which is the molecular weight) of the total amount of carbon atoms that are responding to the FID. For fatty acids,
the carbons that are responding to FID are CH, CH2, and CH3 units. Carbonyl carbon and ester carbonyls carbon
do not respond to FID. So that in FAME, all the carbon atoms are active, except the ester carbon. Thus, there are
Nx–1 active carbon atoms in a FAME. So that the TRF for a FAME would be:
(b) Since the FID response depends on the proportion of active carbon atoms, to determine the actual weight of a FAME,
the experimental measured area (or the weight) needs to be corrected. This factor is termed as TCF and it is equal to
1/TRF. In other words formula for TCF is as follows:
6 TheTRF of 18:0 FAME is 0.7243. Therefore, its TCF is 1/0.7243 = 1.3806. Thus TCF of 18:0 FAME with respect
to 13:0 FAME = 1.3806/1.4625 = 0.9440 (Table 3).
REFERENCES
1. Regulations Amending the Food and Drug Regulations (Nutrition Labelling, Nutrient Content Claims and Health
Claims). Department of Health, Canada Gazette, Part 11. January 1, 2003.
2. Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. 21 CFR Part 101 [Docket No. 94P-
0036]. Food Labeling: Trans Fatty Acids in Nutrition Labelling, Nutrient Content Claims, and Health Claims.
Washington, DC. July 2003, pp. 254.
3. ISO 6353, Reagents for Chemical Analysis, Part 2 (1983) and 3 (1987); Specifications.
4. ISO 3696, Water for Analytical Laboratory Use—Specifications and Test Methods (1987).
5. J.M. Snyder and C.R. Scholfield, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 59:469–470 (1982).
6. S.W. Christopherson and R.L. Glass, J. Dairy Sci. 52:1289–1290 (1969).
7. ISO Method 5509, Animal and vegetable fats and oils—Preparation of methyl esters of fatty acids, 12-23-2004.
8. W.W. Christie, J. Lipid Res. 23:1072–1075 (1982).
9. M.P. Yurawecz, J.K. Hood, J.A.G. Roach, M.M. Mossoba, D.H. Daniels, Y. Ku, M.W. Pariza, S.F. Chin, J. Am. Oil
Chem. Soc. 71:1149–1155 (1994).
10. W.M.N. Ratnayake, L.L. Plouffe, E. Pasqier and C. Gagnon, J. AOAC Int. 85:1112–1118 (2002)
11. W.M.N. Ratnayake, S.L. Hansen, and M.P. Kennedy, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 83:475–488 (2006)
12. R.G. Ackman, Application of gas-liquid chromatography to lipid separation and analysis: Qualitative and quanti-
tative analysis. Analyses of Fats, Oils and Lipoproteins, Edited by E.G. Perkins, AOCS Press, Urbana, IL, 1991, pp.
270–300.
13. J.L. Sebedio, Classical chemical techniques for fatty acid analysis. New Trends in Lipid and Lipoprotein Analyses. Eds.
J.L. Sebedio and E.G. Perkins, AOCS Press, Champaign, IL, 1995, pp. 277–289.
14. J.D. Craske and C.D. Bannon, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 64:1413–1417, 1987.
15. J.D. Craske and C.D. Bannon, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 65:1190–1991, 1988.
16. R.G. Ackman, J.C. Sipos, and C.S. Tocher, J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, 24:635–650, 1967.
17. C. Cruz-Hernandez, Z. Deng, J. Zhou, A.R. Hill, M.P. Yurawecz, P. Delmonte, M.G. Mossoba, M.E.R. Dugan,
and J.K.G. Kramer, J. AOAC International 87:545–562 (2004).
18. D. Precht and J. Molkentin, Fett./Lipid, 9(5), 319–326, 1997.
19. F. Destaillats, P. A. Golay, F. Joffre, M. de Wispelaere, B. Hug, F. Giuffrida, L. Fauconnot, and F. Dionisi, J.
Chromat. A, 1145, 222–228, 2007.
20. V. Santercole, R. Mazzette, E. P. L. De Santis, S. Banni, L. Goonewardene, and J. K. G. Kramer, Lipids, 42:361–
382, 2007.
21. F. Dionisi, P.A. Golay, and L.B. Fay, Analytica Chimica Acta, 465, 395–407, 2002.
22. D. Precht and J. Molkentin, Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 102–113 (2000).
23. J.K.G. Kramer, M. Hernandez, C. Cruz-Hernandez, J. Kraft, M.E.R. Dugan, Lipids 43:259–273 (2008).
24. J.A.G. Roach, M.P Yurawecz, J.K.G. Kramer, M.M. Mossoba, K. Eulitz, and Y. Ku, Lipids, 35:797–802 (2000).
All rights reserved. No part of this method may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisher.
TABLE 1 Example elution order of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME). Separations were on a SPTM-2560 (100 m x 0.25 mm x 0.20
µm). Column temperature was 180 °C (32 min) to 215 °C @ 20 °C/min (hold 31.25 min). Carrier gas was hydrogen at 1.0 mL/min
(constant flow) with a linear velocity of 26 cm/s. Pressure was 24.63 psi @ 180 °C. Injection and FID temperatures were 235 °C and
325 °C, respectively. Split ratio was 1:100. Please note that different columns will have different retention times and sometimes the
order of elution of the fatty acids can change for later eluting compounds. Fatty acids in parentheses coelute with the peaks listed
in the same cell for this column.
Tr Tr Tr
Fatty Acids (min) Fatty Acids (min) Fatty Acids (min)
All rights reserved. No part of this method may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisher.
12:0 9.917 13c-18:1 21.794 21:0 32.371
iso 13:0 10.215 16t-18:1 21.952 8c,10c-18:2 32.500
anteiso 13:0 10.390 14c-18:1 22.148 9c,11c-18:2 32.687
13:0 (IS) 10.607 15c-18:1 (19:0) 22.309 10c,12c-18:2 32.750
iso 14:0 10.993 t,t-NMID_1 22.500 11c,13c-18:2 32.800
14:0 11.505 t,t-NMID_2 22.622 t,t-conj.-18:2_1 33.000
12c-13:1 11.705 t,t-NMID_3 22.800 t,t-conj.-18:2_2 33.281
iso 15:0 12.011 9t,12t-18:2 22.941 12t,14t-18:2 33.300
anteiso 15:0 12.212 9t,13c-18:2/8t,12c-18:2 23.227 11t,13t-18:2 33.489
9t-14:1 12.289 17-cyclo 23.487 t,t-8,10;9,11;10,12-18:2 33.599
9c-14:1 (14:1n-5) 12.616 9c,12t-18:2/8t,13c-18:2 23.743 7t,9t-18:2 33.738
15:0 12.666 16c-18:1 23.847 6c,9c,12c,15c-18:4 33.904
iso 16:0 13.340 9t,12c-18:2 24.302 11c,14c-20:2 34.133
10c-15:1 (15:1n-5) 13.983 11t,15c-18:2 24.403 22:0 35.425
16:0 14.237 9c,12c-18:2 24.794 8c,11c,14c-20:3 (20:3n-6) 36.134
iso 17:0 15.079 9c,15c-18:2 25.190 13c-22:1 (22:1n-9) 37.164
9t-16:1 15.206 9t,12t,15t-18:3 26.578 11c,14c,17c-20:3 (20:3n-3) 37.337
11t-12t-16:1 15.384 20:0 26.604 5c,8c,11c,14c-20:4 (20:4n-6) 37.732
7c-13t-16:1/anteiso 17:0 15.530 9t,12t,15c-18:3 27.885 23:0 38.000
9c-16:1 (16:1n-7) 15.730 9t,12c,15t-18:3 27.971 13c,16c-22:2 39.980
10c-16:1 15.868 6c,9c,12c-18:3 28.249 5c,8c,11c,14c,17c-20:5 (20:5n-3) 41.430
11c-16:1 16.026 9c,12t,15t-18:3 + 9c,12c,15t-18:3 28.578 24:0 41.655
17:0 16.177 6t-10t-20:1 28.885 15c-24:1 43.196
13c-16:1 16.308 11t-20:1 28.949 13c,16c,19c-22:3 43.667
iso 18:0 17.347 12t-13t-20:1 29.000 7c,10c,13c,16c-22:4 44.760
9t-17:1 17.602 14t-20:1 29.400 25:0 45.232
9c-17:1 (17:1n-7) 18.000 9c-20:1 29.549 7c,10c,13c,16c,19c-22:5 49.443
18:0 18.845 9c,12t,15c-18:3 29.549 4c,7c,10c,13c,16c,19c-22:6 51.719
TABLE 2 Example elution order of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME). Separations were on a SP™ -2560 (100 m × 0.25 mm × 0.20
µm). Column temperature was 180 °C (32 min) to 215 °C @ 20 °C/min (hold 31.25 min). Carrier gas was helium at 2.0 mL/min
(constant flow) with a linear velocity of 28 cm/s. Pressure was 63.29 psi @ 180 °C. Injection and FID temperatures were 235 °C and
325 °C, respectively. Split ratio was 1:100. Please note that different columns will have different retention times and sometimes the
order of elution of the fatty acids can change for later eluting compounds. Fatty acids in parentheses coleute with the peaks listed
in the same cell for this column.
Tr Tr Tr
Fatty Acids (min) Fatty Acids (min) Fatty Acids (min)
TABLE 3 Factors for conversion of FAME to fatty acids and TAG equivalents.
Fatty Acida FFAxb FTAGxc Fatty Acida FFAxb FTAGxc
All rights reserved. No part of this method may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisher.
14:1 0.9417 0.9944 22:4 0.9595 0.9961
15:0 0.9453 0.9948 22:5 0.9593 0.9961
15:1 0.9449 0.9947 22:6 0.9590 0.9961
16:0 0.9481 0.9950 23:0 0.9620 0.9964
16:1 0.9477 0.9950 24:0 0.9633 0.9965
17:0 0.9507 0.9953 24:1 0.9632 0.9965
17:1 0.9503 0.9952 25:0 0.9646 0.9966
18:0 0.9530 0.9955 26:0 0.9658 0.9967
aOnly one factor is given for all positional and geometric isomers and for branched-chain FAME, as the factors are dependent only on the
content of carbon to which hydrogen is bonded.
bF
FAx is the conversion factor for conversion of FAMEs to corresponding fatty acids.
cF
TAGx is the conversion factor for conversion of FAMEs to corresponding TAG equivalents.
TABLE 4 Theoretical flame ionization detector theoretical and empirical correction factors (TCFs/ECFs) for fatty acid
methyl esters (FAME)a
FAME TCF FAME TCF FAME TCF/ECF FAME TCF/ECF
aAtomic weights used: carbon 12.011; hydrogen, 1.0079; oxygen, 15.994. Factors are relative to 13:0, which has a factor of 1.0000 by
definition. Only one factor is given for all positional and geometric isomers and for branched-chain FAME, as the factors are dependent only on
the content of carbon to which hydrogen is bonded. Calculations were adopted from Reference 8.
bECFs are to be calculated from GLC-714. Any positional or geometrical isomers will have the same TCFs and ECFs.
TABLE 5 Results of cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated fatty acid determination by
9 laboratories in a collaborative study organized by AOCS in 2011. FAMEs were analyzed using AOCS Ce 1j-07.
Total Fat Total Fat Total Total Total Total cis Total Total cis Total n-3 Total n-6
(TAG%)* (FA%)* Saturated trans MUFA MUFA PUFA** PUFA** PUFA** PUFA**
Tallow
n 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Mean 99.68 95.21 45.44 7.14 46.53 39.31 2.65 1.99 0.33 1.66
Repeatability (Sr) 1.01 0.96 1.03 0.19 0.78 0.33 0.12 0.05 0.01 0.04
%RSDr 1.01 1.01 2.26 2.73 1.67 0.84 4.43 2.41 3.80 2.33
r (2.8×Sr) 2.82 2.69 2.88 0.55 2.18 0.92 0.33 0.13 0.04 0.11
Reproducibility (SR) 1.66 1.58 1.36 0.30 1.71 0.80 0.34 0.24 0.07 0.18
%RSDR 1.66 1.66 2.99 4.20 3.68 2.03 12.74 12.24 22.64 11.13
R (2.8×SR) 4.64 4.42 3.81 0.84 4.80 2.24 0.94 0.68 0.21 0.52
(continued)
TABLE 5 Continued
Total Fat Total Fat Total Total Total Total cis Total Total cis Total n-3 Total n-6
(TAG%)* (FA%)* Saturated trans MUFA MUFA PUFA** PUFA** PUFA** PUFA**
Cheese Powder
n 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Mean 29.78 28.38 13.49 7.27 14.08 6.95 1.24 0.97 0.14 0.83
Repeatability (Sr) 0.43 0.41 0.22 0.12 0.22 0.12 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.01
%RSDr 1.43 1.44 1.62 1.68 1.55 1.66 3.10 2.22 3.22 1.60
r (2.8×Sr) 1.19 1.14 0.61 0.34 0.61 0.32 0.11 0.06 0.01 0.04
All rights reserved. No part of this method may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisher.
Reproducibility (SR) 2.39 2.28 0.71 0.37 0.75 0.57 0.12 0.02 0.03 0.05
%RSDR 8.02 8.02 5.24 5.04 5.31 8.18 9.54 2.46 19.48 6.58
R (2.8×SR) 6.69 6.38 1.98 1.03 2.09 1.59 0.33 0.07 0.08 0.15
(continued)
TABLE 5 Continued
Total Fat Total Fat Total Total Total Total cis Total Total cis Total n-3 Total n-6
(TAG%)* (FA%)* Saturated trans MUFA MUFA PUFA** PUFA** PUFA** PUFA**
Evaporated milk
n 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Mean 6.28 5.97 3.93 0.33 1.78 1.47 0.23 0.19 0.03 0.16
Repeatability (Sr) 0.29 0.27 0.17 0.03 0.09 0.08 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01
%RSDr 4.61 4.57 4.44 8.45 5.11 5.17 7.06 4.73 8.53 4.38
r (2.8×Sr) 0.81 0.76 0.49 0.08 0.25 0.21 0.05 0.03 0.01 0.02
Reproducibility (SR) 0.29 0.27 0.22 0.05 0.09 0.08 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.02
%RSDR 4.61 4.57 5.54 15.89 5.11 5.17 14.13 10.75 32.47 10.66
R (2.8×SR) 0.81 0.76 0.61 0.15 0.25 0.21 0.09 0.06 0.03 0.05
Peanut butter
n 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Mean 54.01 51.69 10.11 0.06 30.28 30.13 11.23 11.17 0.08 10.79
Repeatability (Sr) 1.17 1.12 0.33 0.01 0.70 0.74 0.29 0.40 0.02 0.26
%RSDr 2.16 2.16 3.29 21.71 2.31 2.47 2.61 3.62 21.36 2.37
r (2.8×Sr) 3.26 3.12 0.93 0.03 1.96 2.08 0.82 1.13 0.05 0.72
All rights reserved. No part of this method may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisher.
Reproducibility (SR) 3.10 2.96 0.79 0.04 1.57 1.60 1.46 1.48 0.08 1.14
%RSDR 5.73 5.73 7.83 75.73 5.17 5.32 13.02 13.21 98.99 10.58
R (2.8×SR) 8.67 8.30 2.22 0.12 4.38 4.49 4.10 4.13 0.22 3.19
Yogurt (plain)
n 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Mean 5.80 5.51 3.60 0.32 1.65 1.37 0.23 0.19 0.03 0.15
Repeatability (Sr) 0.55 0.53 0.39 0.03 0.13 0.11 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01
%RSDr 9.54 9.55 10.90 7.94 8.09 8.26 12.67 13.02 42.60 9.08
r (2.8×Sr) 1.55 1.47 1.10 0.07 0.37 0.32 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.04
Reproducibility (SR) 0.55 0.53 0.39 0.03 0.15 0.14 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01
%RSDR 9.54 9.55 10.90 7.94 9.23 9.92 12.83 13.02 59.74 9.08
R (2.8×SR) 1.55 1.47 1.10 0.07 0.43 0.38 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.04
(continued)
TABLE 5 Continued
Total Fat Total Fat Total Total Total Total cis Total Total cis Total n-3 Total n-6
(TAG%)* (FA%)* Saturated trans MUFA MUFA PUFA** PUFA** PUFA** PUFA**
Butter
n 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Mean 71.12 67.76 36.52 2.49 22.31 20.23 8.77 8.36 1.73 6.91
Repeatability (Sr) 1.62 1.54 1.00 0.13 0.63 0.54 0.44 0.39 0.14 0.14
%RSDr 2.28 2.28 2.73 5.34 2.81 2.68 4.99 4.72 8.25 2.05
r (2.8×Sr) 4.54 4.32 2.80 0.37 1.75 1.52 1.23 1.10 0.40 0.40
Reproducibility (SR) 4.74 4.52 2.32 0.43 1.94 1.74 0.89 0.88 0.15 0.50
%RSDR 6.66 6.68 6.35 17.29 8.69 8.62 10.15 10.50 8.89 7.17
R (2.8×SR) 13.26 12.66 6.49 1.21 5.43 4.88 2.49 2.46 0.43 1.39
All rights reserved. No part of this method may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisher.
Reproducibility (SR) 1.20 1.15 0.50 0.06 0.56 0.56 0.35 0.33 0.03 0.38
%RSDR 2.98 2.98 3.52 12.99 3.33 3.41 4.79 4.50 9.04 5.56
R (2.8×SR) 3.36 3.21 1.41 0.16 1.56 1.56 0.99 0.92 0.09 1.06
Encapsulated DHA/EPA
n 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Mean 56.05 53.66 18.18 0.68 14.09 13.33 21.02 20.63 18.25 2.19
Repeatability (Sr) 1.31 1.26 0.43 0.08 0.37 0.35 0.47 0.46 0.41 0.09
%RSDr 2.34 2.34 2.36 12.13 2.65 2.64 2.23 2.21 2.25 4.24
r (2.8×Sr) 3.68 3.52 1.20 0.23 1.05 0.98 1.31 1.28 1.15 0.26
Reproducibility (SR) 3.32 3.15 0.95 0.23 0.81 0.67 1.83 1.75 1.46 0.93
%RSDR 5.92 5.87 5.22 33.82 5.72 5.01 8.71 8.50 8.01 42.40
R (2.8×SR) 9.29 8.83 2.66 0.64 2.26 1.87 5.13 4.91 4.09 2.60
(continued)
TABLE 5 Continued
Total Fat Total Fat Total Total Total Total cis Total Total cis Total n-3 Total n-6
(TAG%)* (FA%)* Saturated trans MUFA MUFA PUFA** PUFA** PUFA** PUFA**
Potato chips
n 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Mean 36.01 34.44 6.35 0.22 14.16 14.02 13.70 13.59 0.12 13.45
Repeatability (Sr) 1.75 1.67 0.31 0.06 0.74 0.72 0.63 0.61 0.02 0.60
%RSDr 4.85 4.85 4.95 26.22 5.21 5.14 4.57 4.50 13.30 4.50
r (2.8×Sr) 4.89 4.68 0.88 0.16 2.07 2.02 1.75 1.71 0.04 1.69
Reproducibility (SR) 1.75 1.67 0.31 0.14 0.74 0.72 0.63 0.61 0.04 0.60
%RSDR 4.85 4.85 4.95 62.69 5.21 5.14 4.57 4.50 37.66 4.50
R (2.8×SR) 4.89 4.68 0.88 0.39 2.07 2.02 1.75 1.71 0.12 1.69
%RSDR 3.91 3.88 2.22 4.27 2.70 3.04 4.14 10.08 29.05 9.25
R (2.8×SR) 3.30 3.12 0.83 0.86 1.05 0.59 0.15 0.28 0.11 0.22
(continued)
TABLE 5 Continued
Total Fat Total Fat Total Total Total Total cis Total Total cis Total n-3 Total n-6
(TAG%)* (FA%)* Saturated trans MUFA MUFA PUFA** PUFA** PUFA** PUFA**
Horse feed
n 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Mean 3.22 3.07 0.72 0.00 0.76 0.75 1.58 1.58 0.21 1.38
Repeatability (Sr) 0.17 0.16 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.06
%RSDr 5.31 5.26 6.22 0.00 6.27 5.89 4.52 4.52 3.57 4.68
r (2.8×Sr) 0.48 0.45 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.12 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.18
Reproducibility (SR) 0.19 0.18 0.07 0.00 0.06 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.02 0.07
%RSDR 5.86 5.82 9.52 0.00 7.85 5.89 5.54 5.54 8.39 5.36
R (2.8×SR) 0.53 0.50 0.19 0.00 0.17 0.12 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.21
Gamebird feed
n 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Mean 3.00 2.87 0.57 0.00 0.64 0.63 1.65 1.65 0.13 1.52
Repeatability (Sr) 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02
%RSDr 2.25 2.29 4.27 0.00 3.40 3.47 1.49 1.44 1.68 1.50
r (2.8×Sr) 0.19 0.18 0.07 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.06
All rights reserved. No part of this method may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisher.
Reproducibility (SR) 0.40 0.38 0.07 0.00 0.08 0.07 0.26 0.26 0.03 0.23
%RSDR 13.39 13.41 12.91 0.00 12.14 10.97 15.48 15.46 19.07 15.19
R (2.8×SR) 1.12 1.08 0.21 0.00 0.22 0.19 0.72 0.71 0.07 0.64
*NLEA (Nutritional Labeling and Education Act) according to the Office of Nutritional Products, Labeling, and Dietary Supplements in the Center
for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
**Does not include CLA
Page 17 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 18 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 19 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 20 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 3 GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in Tallow from start to 16:0 (References 17–24). See Figure 1a for chromatographic parameters.
Page 21 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 22 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 4b GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in Tallow zoomed in to Oleic and Linoleic regions (References 17–24). See Figure 1a for c hromatographic
parameters.
Page 23 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 24 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 6 GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in Tallow from the CLA region to end of the chromatogram (References 17–24).
See Figure 1a for chromatographic parameters.
Page 25 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 26 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 8 GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in Anhydrous Butterfat from start to 16:0 (References 17–24) .
See Figure 1a for chromatographic parameters.
Page 27 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 28 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 9b GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in Anhydrous Butterfat zoomed in to Oleic and Linoleic regions (References 17–24). See Figure 1a for
chromatographic parameters.
Page 29 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 30 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 11 GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in Anhydrous Butterfat from the CLA region to end of the chromatogram (References 17–24).
See Figure 1a for chromatographic parameters.
Page 31 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 32 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 13 GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in BCR-163 from start to 16:0 (References 17–24). See Figure 1a for chromatographic parameters.
Page 33 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 34 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 14b GC/FID profile of major fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in BCR-163 zoomed in to Oleic and Linoleic regions (References 17–24). See Figure 1a for
chromatographic parameters.
Page 35 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 36 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 16 GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in BCR-163 from the CLA region to end of the chromatogram (References 17–24).
See Figure 1a for chromatographic parameters.
Page 37 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 38 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 17b GC/FID profile of GLC-714. See Figure 17a for chromatographic parameters.
Page 39 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 40 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 19 GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in Tallow from start to 16:0 (References 17–24) . See Figure 17a for chromatographic parameters.
Page 41 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 42 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 20b Blow up GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in Tallow for the Oleic and Linoleic regions. See Figure 17a for chromatographic parameters.
Page 43 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 44 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 22 GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in Tallow from the CLA region to end of the chromatogram (References 17–24). See Figure 17a for
chromatographic parameters.
Page 45 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 46 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 24 GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in Anhydrous Butterfat from start to 16:0 (References 17–24) . See Figure 17a for
chromatographic parameters.
Page 47 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 48 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 25b GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in Anhydrous Butterfat zoomed in to Oleic and Linoleic regions (References 17–24). See Figure 17a for
chromatographic parameters.
Page 49 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 50 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 27 GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in Anhydrous Butterfat from the CLA region to end of the chromatogram (References 17–24).
See Figure 17a for chromatographic parameters.
Page 51 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 52 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 29 GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in BCR-163 from start to 16:0 (References 17–24). See Figure 17a for chromatographic parameters.
Page 53 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 54 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 30b C/FID profile of major fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in BCR-163 zoomed in to Oleic and Linoleic regions (References 17–24). See Figure 17a for
chromatographic parameters.
Page 55 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 56 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 32 GC/FID profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) in BCR-163 from the CLA region to end of the chromatogram (References 17–24).
See Figure 17a for chromatographic parameters.
Page 57 of 58
Ce 1j-07 ■ cis-, trans-, Saturated, Monounsaturated, and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
C ommercial fats and O ils
Page 58 of 58
C ommercial fats and O ils
FIGURE 34 Plot of % ECF—TCF Differences from four different labs. Values should fall between ± 3% for saturated, monounsaturated, and long chain fatty acids
with 18 or less carbons and three or less double bonds.
Tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene) is a colorless, volatile, nonflammable liquid stances. Perform manipulations under a properly operating fume hood. Take partic-
chlorinated hydrocarbon that will emit toxic fumes of phosgene when exposed to ular precautions, such as the use of a glove box, when toxins are in dry form, because
sunlight or flames. It is an irritant to eyes and skin. The TLV is 50 ppm in air. of their electrostatic nature and resulting tendency to disperse in working areas. Swab
accidental spills of toxin with 5% NaOCl bleach. Rinse all glassware exposed to tox-
Tetrahydrofuran is a highly flammable liquid and a dangerous fire risk. The flammable ins with 1% NaOCl bleach solution and then wash thoroughly with warm water.
limits in air are 2–11%. It is toxic by ingestion and inhalation. The TLV in air is 200
ppm. It tends to form peroxides upon storage in air.
REFERENCES
Toluene is a highly flammable liquid and a dangerous fire risk. Explosive limits in air
are 1.27–7%. It is toxic by ingestion, inhalation, and skin absorption. The TLV is Official Methods of Analysis, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 14th edn.,
100 ppm in air. A fume hood should be used at all times when using toluene. 1984, pp. 1010–1015.
Trichloroethane is a synthetic, light-sensitive, volatile, colorless, liquid miscible with Standard Methods for the Analysis of Oils, Fats and Derivatives, 7th edn., Blackwell
many nonpolar organic solvents. It is an irritant to eyes and skin. The TLV is 350 Scientific Publications, 1987.
ppm in air.
Hawley’s Condensed Chemical Dictionary, 11th edn., revised by N. I. Sax and R. J.
Xylene is flammable and a dangerous fire risk. The TLV is 100 ppm in air. Lewis, Jr., 1987.