1
NOT TO CRY: A HEGEMONIC MASCULINITY
FACTOR IN BOYS OF PAKISTANI SOCIETY
Submitted by
Rabia Majid (12)
Rafia Raza (28)
Rizma Ahmed (29)
Esha Majid (38)
Supervisor
Dr. Tahira Akbar
Department of Gender Studies
University of the Punjab Lahore, Pakistan
2
Abstract
The notion of hegemonic masculinity demonstrates men’s power over women. Connell’s
theoretical concept of hegemonic masculinity has been extremely influential in feminist
sociology. The study aims to analyze factors in Pakistan that reinforce hegemonic masculine
attitudes and mindsets. These masculine attitudes that maintain the idea of male supremacy
cause many social problems. Using the theoretical framework of Hegemonic Masculinity
developed by Connell as the foundation, the study thus aims to examine the extent to which
such notions are presented in society. This article will help us to understand why boys do not
cry, however, they are raised in a way that makes them aggressive. This qualitative research
has pointed out the linkage between media portraits and notions of patriarchy such as
masculinity. These media portrayals have been established to reinforce the notions of
conventional and traditional masculine and feminine roles. These conservative gender
perspectives, in turn, are strongly related to various negative consequences such as violence,
harassment, detriment, and discrimination against women. It seems that hegemonic
masculinity is widespread throughout the world, but it is invisible; it is generated in society,
provoking abuses against women and killing men, empowering patriarchal norms, and
creating gender inequalities in the public and private sectors. Hegemonic male
representations are not the norm that has been established that some hegemonic features such
as authority and technical competence are more common compared to other functions, such
as aggressiveness and subordination of women. This article goes in-depth to know how
hegemonic masculinity is constructed with the existence of complicity masculine male
members of the student body. Resultantly, 80% of the respondents agreed that some factors
contribute to the oppression of women, subordination of trans-persons, and broken family
system. The remaining 20% are those who disagreed with this statement.
Keywords: gender, hegemony masculinity, subordination, society,
3
Introduction
Hegemonic masculinity is referred to as an institution that legitimizes men's dominant status
in society and explains the subordination of men who constitute marginalized masculinities
(such as gay) and of women. Male superiority role is reinforced by observing older boys and
the reactions of authority figures, including parents in the home and people in society. The
concept of being male not only demonstrates the superiority of the male gender but also puts
it up on a aggrandize as something to aspire to. Any man who desires to embody such
masculinity must exhibit aggressive and violent behavior while restraining the flow of
vulnerable emotions. The reason behind choosing this research is to fill the gap by
reconnoitering the factors contributing to hegemonic masculinity in our society. Although the
debate on masculinity is generated across many sites such as the home, family, the state, etc
they become more prominent when they are transmitted and circulated through the media and
society. Hegemonic masculinity entails the development of stereotypical, socially constructed
differences between males and females. This form of gender socialization perpetuates
dominance and subordination between and within gender roles. The notion of hegemony has
its genesis in the writing of Gramsci, a status of dominance attained through relative
consensus rather than regular force, even if supported by force (Gramsci,1971). The
consensus is established among those who are benefitted from the promotion of masculinity,
as well as many of those who are oppressed by it, especially women and gays. Although
Pakistani society is changing yet the procedure of change is at a slow pace. This is
predominantly due to the prevalence of old-age systems of masculinity as well as the
unavailability of education and resources. All these factors are combined to forge a society
that is deeply conservative and patriarchal. Although the debate on masculinity is generated
and circulated through the media. Media portrays certain viewpoints over others and
propagates the idea that television reality is the actual social reality. Although gender roles
4
not only in western society but most of the world have undergone radical changes from the
preliminary times where only the men were the heads of the households and women were
mostly housewives yet the media is still at times perpetuating the primary stereotypes.
Considerable research has pointed out the linkage between media portraits and notions of
patriarchy such as masculinity. These media portrayals have been established to reinforce the
notions of conventional/ traditional masculine and feminine roles. These conservative gender
perspectives, in turn, are strongly related to various negative consequences such as violence,
harassment, detriment, and discrimination against women. This demonstrates that media
portrays masculinity that needs to be assessed to diagnose what kinds of messages about
gender norms are being perpetuated. however, as men attempt to achieve hegemonic
masculinity, they create distinct forms of masculinities that provoke a social hierarchical
structure that exerts profound effects on society. All men are subjected to social pressure to
conform to the dominant position of being a man; those who do not, are typically
marginalized and subordinated. This happens, for instance, to those that identify as gay, or
those that are labeled as ‘effeminate’. As a result, a range of gender forms and sexualities that
are not ‘dominant’ is subordinated.
5
Literature Review
Hegemonic Masculinity is a worldwide phenomenon, which breeds at different levels in
numerous societies. (Connell,1995) defined hegemonic masculinity as a “configuration of
gender practice which embodies personify the currently accepted answer to the problem of
the legitimacy of patriarchy, which guarantees (or is taken to guarantee) the dominant status
of men and the subordination of women.” Hegemonic masculinity is therefore conceptualized
predominantly in terms of its normativity -representing the most widespread and most
revered method of being a man in a given context at a given time, determining all other men
and women to position themselves accordingly and legitimizing the extensive discrepancy
between men and women (Messerschmidt,2005). Hegemonic masculinities are constructed
concerning women and the other subordinated or alternative masculinities. Marginalized
masculinities are non-hegemonic because of the interplay of social inequalities other than
genders, such as race, ethnicity, and class, and protest masculinities constructed as
compensatory hyper-masculinity formed in reaction to social positions lacking economic and
political power (Messerchmidt,2019). Hegemony makes linty has traditionally emphasized.
The significance of the body as a key benchmark for the masculine is a prototype. Even less
is regarded about masculinity work specifically in the content material of Pakistan. The
reviews of indigenous masculinity preformat, inside Pakistan have predominantly been
analyzed. Masculinities inside niche double of religion, social media. Pakistan offers
treasured insights into How masculinizes are performed, embodied, and suppressed in
excessive stress situations due to the fact of prevailing patriarchal norms.
In Pakistan, trans- men are severely segregated and offer no incentive to get an education and
earn a healthy living, making them street beggars for straight men to gain all the power.
Hegemonic masculinity seems to be widespread throughout the world, but it is invisible; it is
6
generated in society, provoking abuses against women and killing men, empowering
patriarchal norms and creating gender inequalities in the public and private sectors.
According to Philosopher Antonio Gramsci, hegemony is about winning and attaining
supremacy to exercise power, ability to coerce, if need be (Donaldson,1993). Hegemonic
masculinity is the concept that explains the cultural behavior of men in society is not hosting
other manufacturers, but this is a representation of the privilege and uses men collectively on
women.
Figure 1: Cycle of Hegemonic Masculinity of Connell
The principles of hegemonic masculinity include rapid behavior and aggression, resistance to
expression of emotions and showing strength, seeding, racism, and homophobia, that
hegemonic makeup messages have integrated the size of power, early childhood, boys are
captured that they are not crying and be strong and courageous and returning from sensitivity
because it refers to being a female. Hegemonic masculinity is rare, but it exists and reaches
its single vision, it is not easy, so it is the same way in which hegemonic masculinity clearly
defines men independent of emotional, aggressive, unzipped, and not passionate United
Nations perfection of femininity.
7
Hegemony can additionally lead to excessive morbidity and abundance in men due to
opposition to the pursuit of scientific health. Hegemonic masculinity is cultivated in Pakistan,
where women, queer, trans- men are extremely marginalized and deprived of their rights. The
toxicity of hegemonic masculinity goes unnoticed, while women are uncovered to
psychological, bodily, and sexual abuse and do not pronounce sentences for justice.
According to sociologist Richard Gelles except for police and military, the family is the
most violent group in the society (Hadi,2017). The effect of hegemonic masculinity on
societies is to create awareness regarding the possible solutions for them to be implemented.
The political and financial establishments of society are affected through the outcomes of
hegemonic masculinity. Qandeel Baloch, a social media star, was suppressed by using her
honor secretary, signifying the electricity of men over women. Hegemonic masculinity is a
social stigma in Pakistani Society.
The most popular television stars emitted in Pakistan enhance the ideas of hegemonic
attitudes and mentality and mentality. These male attitudes perpetuate the concept that male
superiority was found to cause many social problems. Hegemonic male representations are
not the norm that has been established that some hegemonic features such as authority and
technical competence are more common compared to other functions, such as aggressiveness
and subordination of women. This article ahead goes in-depth as to how hegemonic
masculinity is constructed in the university and with the existence of hegemonic masculinity
is the complicity masculine male member of the student body.
Hegemonic masculinity may also incur high rates of morbidity due to resistance to seek
medical health early (Schrock&Schwalble,2009). Research has found that men’s authority
and technical competence are more common as compared to other traits such as
aggressiveness and subordination of women (JM,2008).Some hegemonic traits such as
8
authority and technical competence have been found to be more common as compared to
other traits such as aggressiveness and subordination of women (Malik,2021).
According to Psychologists one of the ways that hegemonic masculinity traits are constructed
in University going adolescent is through “masculinizing activities that set(boys) apart from
girls ” (Dude,2011).Construction of male hegemony through education in Peshawar, a major
Pakistani City According to muted group theory, males are part of the dominant culture
whereas females develop in a subordinate culture. Pakistani Families are regulated in the
bases of power and control the leader where the male is the focal character. Focusing on the
Pakistani/Afghan context, Jihad masculinity primarily as a contemporary permutation of a
local /regional hegemonic masculinity rooted in traditional patriarchy and tribal values that
promote masculine aggressiveness and dominance and emphasize concepts of honor and
shame (Aslam,2014).Hegemonic masculinity theory has constructed to understandings of
gender.
Objectives
1. To analyze factors that contribute to hegemonic masculinity in our society.
2. To look hegemonic masculinity is the root cause of women subordination.
3. To see hegemonic masculinity leads to broken family system.
Research Methodology
Research Methods are ways of collecting and analyzing data. The common methods from
which we collected data include like; case studies, surveys, questionnaires, etc. The variables,
population and sample of our research proposal are given below:
Variables: Variable which we selected for our research article is males which are the notion
of unfair division of resources. Women and Employees are constant in this research.
9
Population: Our research article Population is the Students of department of Gender Studies
of Punjab University, Lahore. It includes; males of age between 20-25 .Our total Population
is of 30 male students of department of gender studies.
Sample: The samples of our research article includes; the male students from department of
Gender Studies, Punjab University Lahore.
Discussion
1. Analyzing factors that contribute hegemonic masculinity in our society.
The first objective illustrates that some factors promote hegemonic masculinity. According to
our survey, we came to know that hegemonic masculinity is a social stigma in society. 5% of
the respondents strongly agreed upon this that enforcement of hegemony in males is through
our society which becomes the cause of women suppression. 5% were those who disagreed
with this. I think hegemonic masculinity is a system constructed into social institutions to
make it appear normal and natural for the maintenance superordinate position of men. For
instance, major societal institutions including government, the economy, and the family are
structured to reinforce and reproduce male hegemony in ways ranging from structure,
credentialing, and even cultural symbolic expressions. Additionally, the hierarchical
correlations of men with other men are expressed in both social structures as well as cultural
expectations such as; gays' resistance in the military or the gendering of occupations,
including typically female jobs like a librarian, elementary teacher, or nurse. Culturally
dominant behavior of men in society leads to discrimination. It is not hegemonic to other
masculinities only, but it is a representation of privilege and leverage men collectively have
over women. Social structures including; family(parents) and then people in our
surroundings generate gender discrimination of being ‘masculine’ or ‘feminine.’ A feminist
and socialist scholar, Simone de Beauvoir, elucidates that the binary understanding of sex
10
implies man being superior to others and delimit between the notion of ‘sex’ and ‘gender.’
“One is not born woman, but rather becomes a woman” (Beauvoir, 1949) represents gender
as a social role. Considering family as the first factor that establishes hegemonic masculinity,
here there is an example to satisfy this. Pakistani social media star, Qandeel Baloch, was
killed by her brother for honor, which denotes the invincible power of men over women. By
killing a woman, he not only restored the honor of the family but also publicly demonstrates
his ability. Such honor-based violence contra women take place not only in small settlements
but in significant cities of Pakistan as well. However, these are the factors that promote
hegemonic masculinity.
2. Hegemonic masculinity is the root cause of women subordination and trans-
persons
This objective discussed how hegemonic masculinity is the root cause of women's
subordination and trans-persons? About 20% of respondents (male students) agree with that
point, hegemonic masculinity is based on women's and trans-person’s subjugation, yet the
latter are crucial in the development and reproduction of the social model. Hegemonic
Masculinity, according to Connell and Messner's works, comprises a specialized technique
for the subordination of women. The question arises that is hegemonic masculinity causes
violence against women and trans-persons? About 10% of respondents (male students)
disagree with that statement. The male students of the University believed that masculine
norms, in particular, are conceptualized in a way that supports men's dominance and women's
subjugation. Sexual aggression is a common tactic for preserving control over girls. Few
male students agree that a man must be dominant in society and girls must be subordinated
for this authority to be maintained. Many male students are liked to demonstrate hegemonic
masculinity as such that men are expected to follow a tight set of male gender norms to
demonstrate hegemonic masculinity. Men are urged to avoid displaying feminine
11
characteristics such as emotionality, hardness, and violent behaviour. Now, the question
arises is the subordination of women is the aggressive and violent attitude of men or not?
Then 10% of respondents (male students) agreed/responded with that statement the
safeguarding of practices that institutionalize men's control over women is referred to as
hegemonic masculinity. Across the globe, violence against women is being recognized as a
severe public health issue. Hegemonic masculinity refers to the normative notion that being a
man means being dominant in society and that girls must be subordinated to sustain power
(Messerschmift,2019). Men are expected to follow a rigorous set of predefined masculine
gender roles that work to establish male domination through subjugation to demonstrate
hegemonic masculinity. The subordination of women is those in which males are
outperformed or made to feel vulnerable as a result of a woman's actions. A man in a
submissive position suffers from this. The answer to that question (Is hegemonic masculinity
is a framework where stereotypically masculine traits are overemphasized)? When men do
not practice gender by the dominant system and ideology, they risk being subordinated.
Connell's theory is that hegemonic masculinity as a system is established into social
institutions for men's superior status to appear normal and natural. Hegemonic complicity can
be measured on four different levels: ideal masculinity, hierarchical ranking, and subjugation
of women's behaviour (Connell,1995). Hegemonic masculinity is uncommon, but it does
exist, and achieving its unified vision is difficult, thus it comes at a price. To achieve the ideal
level of manhood and feel less excluded, men who feel inadequate, weak, and imperfect
strive to subordinate other men by bullying them. In Pakistan, where women, gay, and trans-
men are highly marginalized and denied basic rights, hegemonic masculinity is nurtured.
3. Hegemonic masculinity leads to broken family system.
This objective explains how hegemonic masculinity leads to a broken family system. About
25% of respondents responded that hegemonic masculinity leads to a broken family system.
12
Hegemonic Masculinity is an issue that, if noticed, can affect the improvement of family
morality and prevent the collapse of family values. Psychological and sociological attempts
were made by the Hegemonic system to remove the ethical norms. Does the question arise as
to how Pakistan's selected Hegemonic System in their family? Because this system
(Hegemonic Masculinity) can dominate the family, other aspects of society, such as politics
and economics will be easy to control. About 5% of respondents disagree that the family is
ruled by the Hegemonic Masculinity System. In another perspective, the family is like the
major castle, which if conquered, will easily lead to the capture of smaller castles and the
anticipated trenches. Hegemonic Masculinity is a perpetual source of conflict. The question
asked from participants that Do hegemonic masculinity give a man more power over women?
So, many respondents strongly agreed with that statement that hegemonic masculinity causes
subjugation of women in Pakistani society.
Conclusion
Hegemonic Masculinity refers to socially manufactured notions of manliness, such as
stereotyped traits of strength, aggression, power, and domination in interpersonal
relationships (Connell & Messerschmidt,2005). In particular, men may encounter gender-
specific internal and external impediments to aid in the search for hegemonic masculinity,
such as conventions and standards (Allen-Collinson,2009). Men's devotion to hegemonic
masculinity, such as self-reliance and stoicism, create internal hurdles. Hegemonic
masculinity has historical roots in both social psychology and sociology, both of which
contributed to the literature on the male sex role, which began to identify the social nature of
masculinity and the potential of change in men's behaviour (Helen,1957). Originally,
hegemonic masculinity was defined as a style of behaviour that permitted men to maintain
their domination over women. Hegemonic masculinity among whites sustains institutional
13
oppression in a racial setting. Hegemonic masculinity is a notion that helps us understand
how the presence of several masculinities creates hierarchical dominance not just between
men and women, but also within males. The pressure to adhere to and relate to this idealized
dominating masculinity maintains society's gender-biased hierarchy. Depending on the
community in which it is anchored, the sort of hegemonic masculinity that controls social
hierarchies has distinct characteristics. Nonetheless, it shares characteristics with other
geographical and historical communities. The consequences of hegemonic masculinity's
presence are subsequently transferred into society's institutional, legal, political, and
economic domains, perpetuating gender inequity between genders. Furthermore, men and
women must match the roles that are socially allocated to them, the social role of a man
might perpetuate gender-biased societal norms that stifle creativity. The absence of life
options and choices severely limits an individual's ability to choose the life that he or she
values. As a result, hegemonic masculinity has far-reaching consequences in society, hurting
social equality and human development.
Limitations
There are some possible limitations in this research. Primarily the population was minimum
which made the result doubtful because the collected data is not sufficient: only 30
participants were involved. Secondly, there was a short period of discussing and analyzing
the respective course. Since this research was conducted only department of Gender Studies
of Punjab University, so no additional time was allotted and peer feedback sessions were also
limited.