Cse v Database Management Systems
Cse v Database Management Systems
com
Database Management System 10CS54
PART - A
UNIT – 1 6 Hours
UNIT – 2 6 Hours
Entity-Relationship Model: Using High-Level Conceptual Data Models for Database Design;
An Example Database Application; Entity Types, Entity Sets, Attributes and Keys; Relationship
types, Relationship Sets, Roles and Structural Constraints; Weak Entity Types; Refining the ER
Design; ER Diagrams, Naming Conventions and Design Issues; Relationship types of degree
higher than two.
UNIT – 3 8 Hours
Relational Model and Relational Algebra: Relational Model Concepts; Relational Model
Constraints and Relational Database Schemas; Update Operations, Transactions and dealing with
constraint violations; Unary Relational Operations: SELECT and PROJECT; Relational Algebra
Operations from Set Theory; Binary Relational Operations: JOIN and DIVISION; Additional
Relational Operations; Examples of Queries in Relational Algebra; Relational Database Design
Using ER- to-Relational Mapping.
UNIT – 4 6 Hours
SQL – 1: SQL Data Definition and Data Types; Specifying basic constraints in SQL; Schema
change statements in SQL; Basic queries in SQL; More complex SQL Queries.
PART - B
UNIT – 5 6 Hours
SQL – 2 : Insert, Delete and Update statements in SQL; Specifying constraints as Assertion and
Trigger; Views (Virtual Tables) in SQL; Additional features of SQL; Database programming
issues and techniques; Embedded SQL, Dynamic SQL; Database stored procedures and SQL /
P S M.
UNIT – 6 6 Hours
UNIT – 7 6 Hours
Database Design -2: Properties of Relational Decompositions; Algorithms for Relational
Database Schema Design; Multivalued Dependencies and Fourth Normal Form; Join
Dependencies and Fifth Normal Form; Inclusion Dependencies; Other Dependencies and Normal
Forms
UNIT – 8 8 Hours
Transaction Management: The ACID Properties; Transactions and Schedules; Concurrent
Execution of Transactions; Lock- Based Concurrency Control; Performance of locking;
Transaction support in SQL; Introduction to crash recovery; 2PL, Serializability and
Recoverability; Lock Management; Introduction to ARIES; The log; Other recovery-related
structures; The write-ahead log protocol; Check pointing; Recovering from a System Crash;
Media Recovery; Other approaches and interaction with concurrency control.
Text Books:
1. Elmasri and Navathe: Fundamentals of Database Systems,5th Edition, Pearson Education,
2007.(Chapters 1, 2, 3 except 3.8, 5, 6.1 to 6.5, 7.1, 8, 9.1, 9.2 except SQLJ, 9.4, 10)
2. Raghu Ramakrishnan and Johannes Gehrke: Database Management Systems, 3rd Edition,
McGraw-Hill, 2003. (Chapters 16, 17.1, 17.2, 18)
Reference Books:
1. Silberschatz, Korth and Sudharshan: Data base System Concepts, 6th Edition, Mc-GrawHill,
2010.
2. C.J. Date, A. Kannan, S. Swamynatham: An Introduction to Database Systems, 8th Edition,
Pearson Education, 2006
INDEX SHEET
Contents Page No
1.1 Introduction
1.2: An Example:
2.1-RELATIONSHIP MODEL
UNIT 3 The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints and Relational
Algebra 32-50
3.3.1 Insert
3.3.2 Delete
3.3.3 Update:
6.3 Normalization
UNIT 1
1.1 Introduction
1.2: An Example:
The applications mentioned above are all "traditional" ones for which the use of rigidly-
structured textual and numeric data suffices. Recent advances have led to the application of
database technology to a wider class of data. Examples include multimedia databases (involving
pictures, video clips, and sound messages) and geographic databases (involving maps, satellite
images).
Also, database search techniques are applied by some WWW search engines.
Definitions
The term database is often used, rather loosely, to refer to just about any collection of related
data. E&N say that, in addition to being a collection of related data, a database must have the
following properties:
x It represents some aspect of the real (or an imagined) world, called the miniworld or
universe of discourse. Changes to the miniworld are reflected in the database. Imagine,
for example, a UNIVERSITY miniworld concerned with students, courses, course
sections, grades, and course prerequisites.
x It is a logically coherent collection of data, to which some meaning can be attached.
(Logical coherency requires, in part, that the database not be self-contradictory.)
x It has a purpose: there is an intended group of users and some preconceived applications
that the users are interested in employing.
To summarize: a database has some source (i.e., the miniworld) from which data are derived,
some degree of interaction with events in the represented miniworld (at least insofar as the data
is updated when the state of the miniworld changes), and an audience that is interested in using
it.
An Aside: data vs. information vs. knowledge: Data is the representation of "facts" or
"observations" whereas information refers to the meaning thereof (according to some
interpretation). Knowledge, on the other hand, refers to the ability to use information to achieve
intended ends.
Computerized vs. manual: Not surprisingly (this being a CS course), our concern will be with
computerized database systems, as opposed to manual ones, such as the card catalog-based
systems that were used in libraries in ancient times (i.e., before the year 2000). (Some authors
wouldn't even recognize a non-computerized collection of data as a database, but E&N do.)
Size/Complexity: Databases run the range from being small/simple (e.g., one person's recipe
database) to being huge/complex (e.g., Amazon's database that keeps track of all its products,
customers, and suppliers).
More specifically, a DBMS is a general purpose software system facilitating each of the
following (with respect to a database):
x definition: specifying data types (and other constraints to which the data must conform)
and data organization
x construction: the process of storing the data on some medium (e.g., magnetic disk) that
is controlled by the DBMS
x manipulation: querying, updating, report generation
x sharing: allowing multiple users and programs to access the database "simultaneously"
x system protection: preventing database from becoming corrupted when hardware or
software failures occur
x security protection: preventing unauthorized or malicious access to database.
Given all its responsibilities, it is not surprising that a typical DBMS is a complex piece of
software.
A database together with the DBMS software is referred to as a database system. (See Figure
1.1, page 7.)
1.2: An Example:
Among the main ideas illustrated in this example is that each file/relation/table has a set of
named fields/attributes/columns, each of which is specified to be of some data type. (In addition
to a data type, we might put further restrictions upon a field, e.g., GRADE_REPORT must have
a value from the set {'A', 'B', ..., 'F'}.)
The idea is that, of course, each table will be populated with data in the form of
records/tuples/rows, each of which represents some entity (in the miniworld) or some
relationship between entities.
For example, each record in the STUDENT table represents a —surprise!— student. Similarly
for the COURSE and SECTION tables.
Of course, a query/update must be conveyed to the DBMS in a precise way (via the query
language of the DBMS) in order to be processed.
As with software in general, developing a new database (or a new application for an existing
database) proceeds in phases, including requirements analysis and various levels of design
(conceptual (e.g., Entity-Relationship Modeling), logical (e.g., relational), and physical (file
structures)).
For example, a university's Registrar's Office would maintain data (and programs) relevant to
student grades and course enrollments. The Bursar's Office would maintain data (and programs)
pertaining to fees owed by students for tuition, room and board, etc. (Most likely, the people in
these offices would not be in direct possession of their data and programs, but rather the
university's Information Technology Department would be responsible for providing services
such as data storage, report generation, and programming.)
One result of this approach is, typically, data redundancy, which not only wastes storage space
but also makes it more difficult to keep changing data items consistent with one another, as a
change to one copy of a data item must be made to all of them (called duplication-of-effort).
Inconsistency results when one (or more) copies of a datum are changed but not others. (E.g., If
you change your address, informing the Registrar's Office should suffice to ensure that your
grades are sent to the right place, but does not guarantee that your next bill will be, as the copy of
your address "owned" by the Bursar's Office might not have been changed.)
In the database approach, a single repository of data is maintained that is used by all the
departments in the organization. (Note that "single repository" is used in the logical sense. In
physical terms, the data may be distributed among various sites, and possibly mirrored.)
1. Self-Description: A database system includes —in addition to the data stored that is of
relevance to the organization— a complete definition/description of the database's
structure and constraints. This meta-data (i.e., data about data) is stored in the so-called
system catalog, which contains a description of the structure of each file, the type and
storage format of each field, and the various constraints on the data (i.e., conditions that
the data must satisfy).
The system catalog is used not only by users (e.g., who need to know the names of tables
and attributes, and sometimes data type information and other things), but also by the
DBMS software, which certainly needs to "know" how the data is structured/organized in
order to interpret it in a manner consistent with that structure. Recall that a DBMS is
general purpose, as opposed to being a specific database application. Hence, the structure
of the data cannot be "hard-coded" in its programs (such as is the case in typical file
processing approaches), but rather must be treated as a "parameter" in some sense.
If, for some reason, we decide to change the structure of the data (e.g., by adding the first
two digits to the YEAR field, in order to make the program Y2K compliant!), every
application in which a description of that file's structure is hard-coded must be changed!
In contrast, DBMS access programs, in most cases, do not require such changes, because
the structure of the data is described (in the system catalog) separately from the programs
that access it and those programs consult the catalog in order to ascertain the structure of
the data (i.e., providing a means by which to determine boundaries between records and
between fields within records) so that they interpret that data properly.
In other words, the DBMS provides a conceptual or logical view of the data to
application programs, so that the underlying implementation may be changed without the
programs being modified. (This is referred to as program-data independence.)
Also, which access paths (e.g., indexes) exist are listed in the catalog, helping the DBMS
to determine the most efficient way to search for items in response to a q uery.
Data Abstraction:
A data model is used to hide storage details and present the users with a
conceptual view of the database.
Programs refer to the data model constructs rather than data storage details
Note: In fairness to COBOL, it should be pointed out that it has a COPY feature that
allows different application programs to make use of the same file descriptor stored in a
"library". This provides some degree of program-data independence, but not nearly as
much as a good DBMS does. End of note.
Example by which to illustrate this concept: Suppose that you are given the task of
developing a program that displays the contents of a particular data file. Specifically,
each record should be displayed as follows:
Record #i:
value of first field
value of second field
...
...
value of last field
To keep things very simple, suppose that the file in question has fixed-length records of
57 bytes with six fixed-length fields of lengths 12, 4, 17, 2, 15, and 7 bytes, respectively,
all of which are ASCII strings. Developing such a program would not be difficult.
However, the obvious solution would be tailored specifically for a file having the
particular structure described here and would be of no use for a file with a different
structure.
Now suppose that the problem is generalized to say that the program you are to develop
must be able to display any file having fixed-length records with fixed-length fields that
are ASCII strings. Impossible, you say? Well, yes, unless the program has the ability to
access a description of the file's structure (i.e., lengths of its records and the fields
therein), in which case the problem is not hard at all. This illustrates the power of
metadata, i.e., data describing other data.
As another example, a Registrar's Office employee might think that GPA is a field of data
in each student's record. In reality, the underlying database might calculate that value
each time it is needed. This is called virtual (or derived) data.
A view designed for an academic advisor might give the appearance that the data is
structured to point out the prerequisites of each course.
A good DBMS has facilities for defining multiple views. This is not only convenient for
users, but also addresses security issues of data access. (E.g., The Registrar's Office view
should not provide any means to access financial data.)
4. Data Sharing and Multi-user Transaction Processing: As you learned about (or will)
in the OS course, the simultaneous access of computer resources by multiple
users/processes is a major source of complexity. The same is true for multi-user DBMS's.
Arising from this is the need for concurrency control, which is supposed to ensure that
several users trying to update the same data do so in a "controlled" manner so that the
results of the updates are as though they were done in some sequential order (rather than
interleaved, which could result in data being incorrect).
This gives rise to the concept of a transaction, which is a process that makes one or more
accesses to a database and which must have the appearance of executing in isolation from
all other transactions (even ones that access the same data at the "same time") and of
being atomic (in the sense that, if the system crashes in the middle of its execution, the
database contents must be as though it did not execute at all).
These apply to "large" databases, not "personal" databases that are defined, constructed, and used
by a single person via, say, Microsoft Access.
1. Database Administrator (DBA): This is the chief administrator, who oversees and
manages the database system (including the data and software). Duties include
authorizing users to access the database, coordinating/monitoring its use, acquiring
hardware/software for upgrades, etc. In large organizations, the DBA might have a
support staff.
2. Database Designers: They are responsible for identifying the data to be stored and for
choosing an appropriate way to organize it. They also define views for different
categories of users. The final design must be able to support the requirements of all the
user sub-groups.
3. End Users: These are persons who access the database for querying, updating, and
report generation. They are main reason for database's existence!
o Casual end users: use database occasionally, needing different information each
time; use query language to specify their requests; typically middle- or high-level
managers.
o Naive/Parametric end users: Typically the biggest group of users; frequently
query/update the database using standard canned transactions that have been
carefully programmed and tested in advance. Examples:
bank tellers check account balances, post withdrawals/deposits
reservation clerks for airlines, hotels, etc., check availability of
seats/rooms and make reservations.
shipping clerks (e.g., at UPS) who use buttons, bar code scanners, etc., to
update status of in-transit packages.
o Sophisticated end users: engineers, scientists, business analysts who implement
their own applications to meet their complex needs.
o Stand-alone users: Use "personal" databases, possibly employing a special-
purpose (e.g., financial) software package. Mostly maintain personal databases
using ready-to-use packaged applications.
o An example is a tax program user that creates its own internal database.
o Another example is maintaining an address book
4. System Analysts, Application Programmers, Software Engineers:
o System Analysts: determine needs of end users, especially naive and parametric
users, and develop specifications for canned transactions that meet these needs.
o Application Programmers: Implement, test, document, and maintain programs
that satisfy the specifications mentioned above.
x Tool developers: design and implement software tools facilitating database system
design, performance monitoring, creation of graphical user interfaces, prototyping, ets.
x Operators and maintenance personnel: responsible for the day-to-day operation of the
system.
On the other hand, redundancy can be used to improve performance of queries. Indexes,
for example, are entirely redundant, but help the DBMS in processing queries more
quickly.
A DBMS should provide the capability to automatically enforce the rule that no
inconsistencies are introduced when data is updated. (Figure 1.6 again, in which
Student_name does not match Student_number.)
The query processing and optimization module is responsible for choosing an efficient
query execution plan for each query submitted to the system. (See Chapter 15.)
5. Providing Backup and Recovery: The subsystem having this responsibility ensures that
recovery is possible in the case of a system crash during execution of one or more
transactions.
6. Providing Multiple User Interfaces: For example, query languages for casual users,
programming language interfaces for application programmers, forms and/or command
codes for parametric users, menu-driven interfaces for stand-alone users.
7. Representing Complex Relationships Among Data: A DBMS should have the
capability to represent such relationships and to retrieve related data quickly.
8. Enforcing Integrity Constraints: Most database applications are such that the semantics
(i.e., meaning) of the data require that it satisfy certain restrictions in order to make sense.
Perhaps the most fundamental constraint on a data item is its data type, which specifies
the universe of values from which its value may be drawn. (E.g., a Grade field could be
defined to be of type Grade_Type, which, say, we have defined as including precisely the
values in the set { "A", "A-", "B+", ..., "F" }.
Another kind of constraint is referential integrity, which says that if the database includes
an entity that refers to another one, the latter entity must exist in the database. For
example, if (R56547, CIL102) is a tuple in the Enrolled_In relation, indicating that a
student with ID R56547 is taking a course with ID CIL102, there must be a tuple in the
Student relation corresponding to a student with that ID.
9. Permitting Inferencing and Actions Via Rules: In a deductive database system, one
may specify declarative rules that allow the database to infer new data! E.g., Figure out
which students are on academic probation. Such capabilities would take the place of
application programs that would be used to ascertain such information otherwise.
Active database systems go one step further by allowing "active rules" that can be used to
initiate actions automatically.
Object-Oriented Database Management Systems (OODBMSs) were introduced in late 1980s and
early 1990s to cater to the need of complex data processing in CAD and other applications.
Many relational DBMSs have incorporated object database concepts, leading to a new category
called object-relational DBMSs (ORDBMSs)
Extended relational systems add further capabilities (e.g. for multimedia data, XML, and other
data types)
UNIT 2
ENTITY.1 Data Models, Schemas, and Instances
2.1-RELATIONSHIP MODEL
2.1.2: Schemas, Instances, and Database State
2.2 DBMS Architecture and Data Independence
2.2.1: Three-Schema Architecture
2.3 Database Languages and Interfaces
2.3.1 DBMS Languages
2.3.2 DBMS Interfaces
2.4 Database System Environment
2.5 Centralized and Client/Server Architectures for DBMS's
2.6 Classification of DBMS's
2.7.Modeling Using the Entity-Relationship Model
2.8 Entity-Relationship (ER) Model
2.8.1 Entities and Attributes
2.8.2: Entity Types, Entity Sets, Keys, and Domains
2.8.3 Initial Conceptual Design of COMPANY database
2.9 Relationship Types, Sets, Roles, and Structural Constraints
2.9.1:Ordering of entity types in relationship types
2.9.2 Degree of a relationship type
2.9.3 Constraints on Relationship Types
2.9.4 Attributes of Relationship Types
2.10 Weak Entity Types
A data model ---a collection of concepts that can be used to describe the conceptual/logical
structure of a database--- provides the necessary means to achieve this abstraction.
By structure is meant the data types, relationships, and constraints that should hold for the data.
Most data models also include a set of basic operations for specifying retrievals/updates.
Object-oriented data models include the idea of objects having behavior (i.e., applicable
methods) being stored in the database (as opposed to purely "passive" data).
According to C.J. Date (one of the leading database experts), a data model is an abstract, self-
contained, logical definition of the objects, operators, and so forth, that together constitute the
abstract machine with which users interact. The objects allow us to model the structure of data;
the operators allow us to model its behavior.
In the relational data model, data is viewed as being organized in two-dimensional tables
comprised of tuples of attribute values. This model has operations such as Project, Select, and
Join.
A data model is not to be confused with its implementation, which is a physical realization on a
real machine of the components of the abstract machine that together constitute that model.
There are other well-known data models that have been the basis for database systems. The best-
known models pre-dating the relational model are the hierarchical (in which the entity types
form a tree) and the network (in which the entity types and relationships between them form a
graph).
The actual data stored in the database probably changes often. The data in the database at a
particular time is called the state of the database, or a snapshot.
Application requirements change occasionally, which is one of the reasons why software
maintenance is important. On such occasions, a change to a database's schema may be called for.
An example would be to add a Date_of_Birth field/attribute to the STUDENT table. Making
changes to a database schema is known as schema evolution. Most modern DBMS's support
schema evolution operations that can be applied while a database is operational.
2.2.1: Three-Schema Architecture: (See Figure 2.2, page 34.) This idea was first described by
the ANSI/SPARC committee in late 1970's. The goal is to separate (i.e., insert layers of
"insulation" between) user applications and the physical database. C.J. Date points out that it is
an ideal that few, if any, real-life DBMS's achieve fully.
x internal level: has an internal/physical schema that describes the physical storage
structure of the database using a low-level data model)
x Conceptual level: has a conceptual schema describing the (logical) structure of the whole
database for a community of users. It hides physical storage details, concentrating upon
describing entities, data types, relationships, user operations, and constraints. Can be
described using either high-level or implementational data model.
x External/view level: includes a number of external schemas (or user views), each of
which describes part of the database that a particular category of users is interested in,
hiding rest of database. Can be described using either high-level or implementational data
model. (In practice, usually described using same model as is the conceptual schema.)
Users (including application programs) submit queries that are expressed with respect to the
external level.
It is the responsibility of the DBMS to transform such a query into one that is expressed with
respect to the internal level (and to transform the result, which is at the internal level, into its
equivalent at the external level).
Data independence is the capacity to change the schema at one level of the architecture without
having to change the schema at the next higher level. We distinguish between logical and
physical data independence according to which two adjacent levels are involved. The former
refers to the ability to change the conceptual schema without changing the external schema. The
latter refers to the ability to change the internal schema without having to change the conceptual.
For an example of physical data independence, suppose that the internal schema is modified
(because we decide to add a new index, or change the encoding scheme used in representing
some field's value, or stipulate that some previously unordered file must be ordered by a
particular field ). Then we can change the mapping between the conceptual and internal schemas
in order to avoid changing the conceptual schema itself.
Not surprisingly, the process of transforming data via mappings can be costly (performance-
wise), which is probably one reason that real-life DBMS's don't fully implement this 3-schema
architecture.
DBMS Languages
x DDL (Data Definition Language): used (by the DBA and/or database designers) to
specify the conceptual schema.
x SDL (Storage Definition Language): used for specifying the internal schema
x VDL (View Definition Language): used for specifying the external schemas (i.e., user
views)
x DML (Data Manipulation Language): used for performing operations such as retrieval
and update upon the populated database
The above description represents some kind of ideal. In real-life, at least so far, the de facto
standard DBMS language is SQL (Standard Query Language), which has constructs to support
the functions needed by DDL, VDL, and DML languages. (Early versions of SQL had features in
support of SDL functions, but no more.)
The main phases of database design are depicted in Figure 3.1, page 59:
In the ER model, the main concepts are entity, attribute, and relationship.
Entity: An entity represents some "thing" (in the miniworld) that is of interest to us, i.e., about
which we want to maintain some data. An entity could represent a physical object (e.g., house,
person, automobile, widget) or a less tangible concept (e.g., company, job, academic course).
Attribute: An entity is described by its attributes, which are properties characterizing it. Each
attribute has a value drawn from some domain (set of meaningful values).
Example: A PERSON entity might be described by Name, BirthDate, Sex, etc., attributes, each
having a particular value.
What distinguishes an entity from an attribute is that the latter is strictly for the purpose of
describing the former and is not, in and of itself, of interest to us. It is sometimes said that an
entity has an independent existence, whereas an attribute does not. In performing data modeling,
however, it is not always clear whether a particular concept deserves to be classified as an entity
or "only" as an attribute.
A composite attribute is one that is composed of smaller parts. An atomic attribute is indivisible
or indecomposable.
To describe the structure of a composite attribute, one can draw a tree (as in the aforementioned
Figure 3.4). In case we are limited to using text, it is customary to write its name followed by a
parenthesized list of its sub-attributes. For the examples mentioned above, we would write
BirthDate(Month,Day,Year)
Address(StreetAddr(StrNum, StrName, AptNum), City, State, Zip)
Single- vs. multi-valued attribute: Consider a PERSON entity. The person it represents has
(one) SSN, (one) date of birth, (one, although composite) name, etc. But that person may have
zero or more academic degrees, dependents, or (if the person is a male living in Utah) spouses!
How can we model this via attributes AcademicDegrees, Dependents, and Spouses? One way is
to allow such attributes to be multi-valued (perhaps set-valued is a better term), which is to say
that we assign to them a (possibly empty) set of values rather than a single value.
Here we have taken the liberty to assume that each academic degree is described by a school,
level (e.g., B.S., Ph.D.), and year. Thus, AcademicDegrees is not only multi-valued but also
composite. We refer to an attribute that involves some combination of multi-valuedness and
compositeness as a complex attribute.
A more complicated example of a complex attribute is AddressPhone in Figure 3.5 (page 65).
This attribute is for recording data regarding addresses and phone numbers of a business. The
structure of this attribute allows for the business to have several offices, each described by an
address and a set of phone numbers that ring into that office. Its structure is given by
Stored vs. derived attribute: Perhaps independent and derivable would be better terms for these
(or non-redundant and redundant). In any case, a derived attribute is one whose value can be
calculated from the values of other attributes, and hence need not be stored. Example: Age can
be calculated from BirthDate, assuming that the current date is accessible.
The Null value: In some cases a particular entity might not have an applicable value for a
particular attribute. Or that value may be unknown. Or, in the case of a multi-valued attribute, the
appropriate value might be the empty set.
Example: The attribute DateOfDeath is not applicable to a living person and its correct value
may be unknown for some persons who have died.
In such cases, we use a special attribute value (non-value?), called null. There has been some
argument in the database literature about whether a different approach (such as having distinct
values for not applicable and unknown) would be superior.
This illustrates the distinction between entity types and entity instances. An entity type serves as
a template for a collection of entity instances, all of which are described by the same collection
of attributes. That is, an entity type is analogous to a class in object-oriented programming and
an entity instance is analogous to a particular object (i.e., instance of a class).
In ER modeling, we deal only with entity types, not with instances. In an ER diagram, each
entity type is denoted by a rectangular box.
An entity set is the collection of all entities of a particular type that exist, in a database, at some
moment in time.
Key Attributes of an Entity Type: A minimal collection of attributes (often only one) that, by
design, distinguishes any two (simultaneously-existing) entities of that type. In other words, if
attributes A1 through Am together form a key of entity type E, and e and f are two entities of type
E existing at the same time, then, in at least one of the attributes Ai (0 < i <= m), e and f must
have distinct values.
An entity type could have more than one key. (An example of this appears in Figure 3.7, page
67, in which the CAR entity type is postulated to have both { Registration(RegistrationNum,
State) } and { VehicleID } as keys.)
Domains (Value Sets) of Attributes: The domain of an attribute is the "universe of values" from
which its value can be drawn. In other words, an attribute's domain specifies its set of allowable
values. The concept is similar to data type.
Suppose that Requirements Collection and Analysis results in the following (informal)
description of the COMPANY miniworld:
x Each department
o has a unique name
o has a unique number
o is associated with a set of locations
o has a particular employee who acts as its manager (and who assumed that position
on some date)
o has a set of employees assigned to it
o controls a set of projects
x Each project
o has a unique name
o has a unique number
o has a single location
o has a set of employees who work on it
o is controlled by a single department
x Each employee
o has a name
o has a SSN that uniquely identifies her/him
o has an address
o has a salary
o has a sex
o has a birthdate
o has a direct supervisor
o has a set of dependents
o is assigned to one department
o works some number of hours per week on each of a set of projects (which need
not all be controlled by the same department)
x Each dependent
o has first name
o has a sex
o has a birthdate
o is related to a particular employee in a particular way (e.g., child, spouse, pet)
o is uniquely identified by the combination of her/his first name and the employee
of which (s)he is a dependent
Using the above structured description as a guide, we get the following preliminary design for
entity types and their attributes in the COMPANY database:
Remarks: Note that the attribute WorksOn of EMPLOYEE (which records on which projects the
employee works) is not only multi-valued (because there may be several such projects) but also
composite, because we want to record, for each such project, the number of hours per week that
the employee works on it. Also, each candidate key has been indicated by underlining.
For similar reasons, the attributes Manager and ManagerStartDate of DEPARTMENT really
ought to be combined into a single composite attribute. Not doing so causes little or no harm,
however, because these are single-valued attributes. Multi-valued attributes would pose some
difficulties, on the other hand. Suppose, for example, that a department could have two or more
managers, and that some department had managers Mary and Harry, whose start dates were 10-
4-1999 and 1-13-2001, respectively. Then the values of the Manager and ManagerStartDate
attributes should be { Mary, Harry } and { 10-4-1999, 1-13-2001 }. But from these two attribute
values, there is no way to determine which manager started on which date. On the other hand, by
recording this data as a set of ordered pairs, in which each pair identifies a manager and her/his
starting date, this deficiency is eliminated. End of Remarks
Having presented a preliminary database schema for COMPANY, it is now convenient to clarify
the concept of a relationship (which is the last of the three main concepts involved in the ER
model).
Relationship: This is an association between two entities. As an example, one can imagine a
STUDENT entity being associated to an ACADEMIC_COURSE entity via, say, an
ENROLLED_IN relationship.
Whenever an attribute of one entity type refers to an entity (of the same or different entity type),
we say that a relationship exists between the two entity types.
From our preliminary COMPANY schema, we identify the following relationship types (using
descriptive names and ordering the participating entity types so that the resulting phrase will be
in active voice rather than passive):
In ER diagrams, relationship types are drawn as diamond-shaped boxes connected by lines to the
entity types involved. See Figure 3.2, page 62. Note that attributes are depicted by ovals
connected by lines to the entity types they describe (with multi-valued attributes in double ovals
and composite attributes depicted by trees). The original attributes that gave rise to the
relationship types are absent, having been replaced by the relationship types.
A relationship set is a set of instances of a relationship type. If, say, R is a relationship type that
relates entity types A and B, then, at any moment in time, the relationship set of R will be a set of
ordered pairs (x,y), where x is an instance of A and y is an instance of B. What this means is that,
for example, if our COMPANY miniworld is, at some moment, such that employees e1, e3, and
e6 work for department d1, employees e2 and e4 work for department d2, and employees e5 and e7
work for department d3, then the WORKS_FOR relationship set will include as instances the
ordered pairs (e1, d1), (e2, d2), (e3, d1), (e4, d2), (e5, d3), (e6, d1), and (e7, d3). See Figure 3.9 on
page 71 for a graphical depiction of this.
2.9.1 Ordering of entity types in relationship types: Note that the order in which we list the
entity types in describing a relationship is of little consequence, except that the relationship name
(for purposes of clarity) ought to be consistent with it. For example, if we swap the two entity
types in each of the first two relationships listed above, we should rename them
IS_MANAGED_BY and IS_CONTROLLED_BY, respectively.
2.9.2 Degree of a relationship type: Also note that, in our COMPANY example, all relationship
instances will be ordered pairs, as each relationship associates an instance from one entity type
with an instance of another (or the same, in the case of SUPERVISES) relationship type. Such
relationships are said to be binary, or to have degree two. Relationships with degree three (called
ternary) or more are also possible, although not as common. This is illustrated in Figure 3.10
(page 72), where a relationship SUPPLY (perhaps not the best choice for a name) has as
instances ordered triples of suppliers, parts, and projects, with the intent being that inclusion of
the ordered triple (s2, p4, j1), for example, indicates that supplier s2 supplied part p4 to project j1).
Roles in relationships: Each entity that participates in a relationship plays a particular role in
that relationship, and it is often convenient to refer to that role using an appropriate name. For
example, in each instance of a WORKS_FOR relationship set, the employee entity plays the role
of worker or (surprise!) employee and each department plays the role of employer or (surprise!)
department. Indeed, as this example suggests, often it is best to use the same name for the role as
for the corresponding entity type.
An exception to this rule occurs when the same entity type plays two (or more) roles in the same
relationship. (Such relationships are said to be reCURsive, which I find to be a misleading use of
that term. A better term might be self-referential.) For example, in each instance of a
SUPERVISES relationship set, one employee plays the role of supervisor and the other plays the
role of supervisee.
Often, in order to make a relationship type be an accurate model of the miniworld concepts that it
is intended to represent, we impose certain constraints that limit the possible corresponding
relationship sets. (That is, a constraint may make "invalid" a particular set of instances for a
relationship type.)
There are two main kinds of relationship constraints (on binary relationships). For illustration, let
R be a relationship set consisting of ordered pairs of instances of entity types A and B,
respectively.
x cardinality ratio:
o 1:1 (one-to-one): Under this constraint, no instance of A may particpate in more
than one instance of R; similarly for instances of B. In other words, if (a1, b1) and
(a2, b2) are (distinct) instances of R, then neither a1 = a2 nor b1 = b2.
Example: Our informal description of COMPANY says that every department
has one employee who manages it. If we also stipulate that an employee may not
(simultaneously) play the role of manager for more than one department, it
follows that MANAGES is 1:1.
o 1:N (one-to-many): Under this constraint, no instance of B may participate in
more than one instance of R, but instances of A are under no such restriction. In
other words, if (a1, b1) and (a2, b2) are (distinct) instances of R, then it cannot be
the case that b1 = b2.
Example: CONTROLS is 1:N because no project may be controlled by more than
one department. On the other hand, a department may control any number of
projects, so there is no restriction on the number of relationship instances in which
a particular department instance may participate. For similar reasons,
SUPERVISES is also 1:N.
o N:1 (many-to-one): This is just the same as 1:N but with roles of the two entity
types reversed.
Example: WORKS_FOR and DEPENDS_ON are N:1.
o M:N (many-to-many): Under this constraint, there are no restrictions. (Hence,
the term applies to the absence of a constraint!)
Example: WORKS_ON is M:N, because an employee may work on any number
of projects and a project may have any number of employees who work on it.
Notice the notation in Figure 3.2 for indicating each relationship type's cardinality ratio.
The pair of answers you get maps into the four possible cardinality ratios as follows:
(yes,yes)-->M:N
(yes,no)-->N:1
(no,yes)-->1:N
(no, no) --> 1:1
x participation: specifies whether or not the existence of an entity depends upon its being
related to another entity via the relationship.
o total participation (or existence dependency): To say that entity type A is
constrained to participate totally in relationship R is to say that if (at some
moment in time) R's instance set is { (a1, b1), (a2, b2), ... (am, bm) },
then (at that same moment) A's instance set must be { a1, a2, ..., am }. In other
words, there can be no member of A's instance set that does not participate in at
least one instance of R.
o partial participation: the absence of the total participation constraint! (E.g., not
every employee has to participate in MANAGES; hence we say that, with respect
to MANAGES, EMPLOYEE participates partially. This is not to say that for all
employees to be managers is not allowed; it only says that it need not be the case
that all employees are managers.
Relationship types, like entity types, can have attributes. A good example is WORKS_ON, each
instance of which identifies an employee and a project on which (s)he works. In order to record
(as the specifications indicate) how many hours are worked by each employee on each project,
we include Hours as an attribute of WORKS_ON. (See Figure 3.2 again.) In the case of an M:N
relationship type (such as WORKS_ON), allowing attributes is vital. In the case of an N:1, 1:N,
or 1:1 relationship type, any attributes can be assigned to the entity type opposite from the 1 side.
For example, the StartDate attribute of the MANAGES relationship type can be given to either
the EMPLOYEE or the DEPARTMENT entity type.
2.10 Weak Entity Types: An entity type that has no set of attributes that qualify as a key is
called weak. (Ones that do are strong.)
An entity of a weak identity type is uniquely identified by the specific entity to which it is related
(by a so-called identifying relationship that relates the weak entity type with its so-called
identifying or owner entity type) in combination with some set of its own attributes (called a
partial key).
Example: A DEPENDENT entity is identified by its first name together with the EMPLOYEE
entity to which it is related via DEPENDS_ON. (Note that this wouldn't work for former
heavyweight boxing champion George Foreman's sons, as they all have the name "George"!)
Because an entity of a weak entity type cannot be identified otherwise, that type has a total
participation constraint (i.e., existence dependency) with respect to the identifying
relationship.
This should not be taken to mean that any entity type on which a total participation constraint
exists is weak. For example, DEPARTMENT has a total participation constraint with respect to
MANAGES, but it is not weak.
In an ER diagram, a weak entity type is depicted with a double rectangle and an identifying
relationship type is depicted with a double diamond.
Design Choices for ER Conceptual Design: Sometimes it is not clear whether a particular
miniworld concept ought to be modeled as an entity type, an attribute, or a relationship type.
Here are some guidelines (given with the understanding that schema design is an iterative
process in which an initial design is refined repeatedly until a satisfactory result is achieved):
UNIT 3
The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints
The Relational Data Model and Relational Database Constraints and Relational Algebra
3.3.1 Insert
3.3.2 Delete
3.3.3 Update:
UNIT 3
x Attribute: the name of the role played by some value (coming from some domain) in the
context of a relational schema. The domain of attribute A is denoted dom(A).
x Tuple: A tuple is a mapping from attributes to values drawn from the respective domains
of those attributes. A tuple is intended to describe some entity (or relationship between
entities) in the miniworld.
x Relation: A (named) set of tuples all of the same form (i.e., having the same set of
attributes). The term table is a loose synonym. (Some database purists would argue that a
table is "only" a physical manifestation of a relation.)
x Relational Schema: used for describing (the structure of) a relation. E.g., R(A1, A2, ...,
An) says that R is a relation with attributes A1, ... An. The degree of a relation is the
number of attributes it has, here n.
(See Figure 5.1, page 149, for an example of a STUDENT relation/table having several
tuples/rows.)
One would think that a "complete" relational schema would also specify the domain of
each attribute.
x Relational Database: A collection of relations, each one consistent with its specified
relational schema.
Ordering of Tuples: A relation is a set of tuples; hence, there is no order associated with them.
That is, it makes no sense to refer to, for example, the 5th tuple in a relation. When a relation is
depicted as a table, the tuples are necessarily listed in some order, of course, but you should
attach no significance to that order. Similarly, when tuples are represented on a storage device,
they must be organized in some fashion, and it may be advantageous, from a performance
standpoint, to organize them in a way that depends upon their content.
Ordering of Attributes: A tuple is best viewed as a mapping from its attributes (i.e., the names
we give to the roles played by the values comprising the tuple) to the corresponding values.
Hence, the order in which the attributes are listed in a table is irrelevant. (Note that,
unfortunately, the set theoretic operations in relational algebra (at least how E&N define them)
make implicit use of the order of the attributes. Hence, E&N view attributes as being arranged as
a sequence rather than a set.)
Values of Attributes: For a relation to be in First Normal Form, each of its attribute domains
must consist of atomic (neither composite nor multi-valued) values. Much of the theory
underlying the relational model was based upon this assumption. Chapter 10 addresses the issue
of including non-atomic values in domains. (Note that in the latest edition of C.J. Date's book, he
explicitly argues against this idea, admitting that he has been mistaken in the past.)
Interpretation of a Relation: Each relation can be viewed as a predicate and each tuple in that
relation can be viewed as an assertion for which that predicate is satisfied (i.e., has value true)
for the combination of values in it. In other words, each tuple represents a fact. Example (see
Figure 5.1): The first tuple listed means: There exists a student having name Benjamin Bayer,
having SSN 305-61-2435, having age 19, etc.
Keep in mind that some relations represent facts about entities (e.g., students) whereas others
represent facts about relationships (between entities). (e.g., students and course sections).
The closed world assumption states that the only true facts about the miniworld are those
represented by whatever tuples currently populate the database.
x R(A1, A2, ..., An) is a relational schema of degree n denoting that there is a relation R
having as its attributes A1, A2, ..., An.
3.2.1 Domain Constraints: Each attribute value must be either null (which is really a non-value)
or drawn from the domain of that attribute. Note that some DBMS's allow you to impose the not
null constraint upon an attribute, which is to say that that attribute may not have the (non-)value
n u ll.
3.2.2 Key Constraints: A relation is a set of tuples, and each tuple's "identity" is given by the
values of its attributes. Hence, it makes no sense for two tuples in a relation to be identical
(because then the two tuples are actually one and the same tuple). That is, no two tuples may
have the same combination of values in their attributes.
Usually the miniworld dictates that there be (proper) subsets of attributes for which no two tuples
may have the same combination of values. Such a set of attributes is called a superkey of its
relation. From the fact that no two tuples can be identical, it follows that the set of all attributes
of a relation constitutes a superkey of that relation.
A key is a minimal superkey, i.e., a superkey such that, if we were to remove any of its
attributes, the resulting set of attributes fails to be a superkey.
Example: Suppose that we stipulate that a faculty member is uniquely identified by Name and
Address and also by Name and Department, but by no single one of the three attributes
mentioned. Then { Name, Address, Department } is a (non-minimal) superkey and each of {
Name, Address } and { Name, Department } is a key (i.e., minimal superkey).
Candidate key: any key! (Hence, it is not clear what distinguishes a key from a candidate key.)
Primary key: a key chosen to act as the means by which to identify tuples in a relation.
Typically, one prefers a primary key to be one having as few attributes as possible.
A relational database schema is a set of schemas for its relations (see Figure 5.5, page 157)
together with a set of integrity constraints.
Entity Integrity Constraint: In a tuple, none of the values of the attributes forming the
relation's primary key may have the (non-)value null. Or is it that at least one such attribute must
have a non-null value? In my opinion, E&N do not make it clear!
Referential Integrity Constraint: (See Figure 5.7) A foreign key of relation R is a set of its
attributes intended to be used (by each tuple in R) for identifying/referring to a tuple in some
relation S. (R is called the referencing relation and S the referenced relation.) For this to make
sense, the set of attributes of R forming the foreign key should "correspond to" some superkey of
S. Indeed, by definition we require this superkey to be the primary key of S.
This constraint says that, for every tuple in R, the tuple in S to which it refers must actually be in
S. Note that a foreign key may refer to a tuple in the same relation and that a foreign key may be
part of a primary key (indeed, for weak entity types, this will always occur). A foreign key may
have value null (necessarily in all its attributes??), in which case it does not refer to any tuple in
the referenced relation.
For each of the update operations (Insert, Delete, and Update), we consider what kinds of
constraint violations may result from applying it and how we might choose to react.
3.3.1 Insert:
Ways of dealing with it: reject the attempt to insert! Or give user opportunity to try again with
different attribute values.
3.3.2 Delete:
3.3.3 Update:
x Key constraint violation: primary key is changed so as to become same as another tuple's
x referential integrity violation:
o foreign key is changed and new one refers to nonexistent tuple
o primary key is changed and now other tuples that had referred to this one violate
the constraint
3.3.4 Transactions: This concept is relevant in the context where multiple users and/or
application programs are accessing and updating the database concurrently. A transaction is a
logical unit of work that may involve several accesses and/or updates to the database (such as
what might be required to reserve several seats on an airplane flight). The point is that, even
though several transactions might be processed concurrently, the end result must be as though
the transactions were carried out sequentially. (Example of simultaneous withdrawals from same
checking account.)
he Relational Algebra
JOIN operations .
x Selects the tuples (rows) from a relation R that satisfy a certain selection condition c
x Form of the operation: c
x The condition c is an arbitrary Boolean expression on the attributes of R
x Resulting relation has the same attributes as R
x Resulting relation includes each tuple in r(R) whose attribute values satisfy the condition
Examples:
DNO=4
(EMPLOYEE)
SALARY>30000
(EMPLOYEE)
x Form of operation: L
(R)
x Resulting relation has only those attributes of R specified in L
x The PROJECT operation eliminates duplicate tuples in the resulting relation so that it
remains a mathematical set (no duplicate elements).
Example: SEX,SALARY(EMPLOYEE)
If several male employees have salary 30000, only a single tuple <M, 30000> is kept in the
resulting relation.
Sequences of operations:
Example: Retrieve the names and salaries of employees who work in department 4:
FNAME,LNAME,SALARY ( DNO=4(EMPLOYEE) )
DEPT4_EMPS DNO=4
(EMPLOYEE)
S FNAME,LNAME,SALARY(DEPT4_EMPS)
Attributes can optionally be renamed in the resulting left-hand-side relation (this may be
required for some operations that will be presented later):
DEPT4_EMPS DNO=4
(EMPLOYEE)
(FIRSTNAME,LASTNAME,SALARY) FNAME,LNAME,SALARY
(DEPT4_EMPS)
UNION: R1 R2,
INTERSECTION: R1 R2,
SET DIFFERENCE: R1 - R2,
CARTESIAN PRODUCT: R1 X R2.
For , , -, the operand relations R1(A1, A2, ..., An) and R2(B1, B2, ..., Bn) must have the same
number of attributes, and the domains of corresponding attributes must be compatible; that is,
dom(Ai) = dom(Bi) for i=1, 2, ..., n. This condition is called union compatibility. The resulting
relation for , , or - has the same attribute names as the first operand relation R1 (by
convention).
CARTESIAN PRODUCT
R(A1, A2, ..., Am, B1, B2, ..., Bn) R1(A1, A2, ..., Am) X R2 (B1, B2, ..., Bn)
If R1 has n1 tuples and R2 has n2 tuples, then R will have n1*n2 tuples.
CARTESIAN PRODUCT is a meaningless operation on its own. It can combine related tuples
from two relations if followed by the appropriate SELECT operation.
Example: Combine each DEPARTMENT tuple with the EMPLOYEE tuple of the manager.
DEPT_MANAGER MGRSSN=SSN
(DEP_EMP)
R(A1, A2, ..., Am, B1, B2, ..., Bn) R1(A1, A2, ..., Am) c
R2 (B1, B2, ..., Bn)
EQUIJOIN: The join condition c includes one or more equality comparisons involving
attributes from R1 and R2. That is, c is of the form:
RESULT DNAME,FNAME,LNAME
(T)
In an EQUIJOIN R R1 c R2, the join attribute of R2 appear redundantly in the result relation
R. In a NATURAL JOIN, the redundant join attributes of R2 are eliminated from R. The
equality condition is implied and need not be specified.
Example: Retrieve each EMPLOYEE's name and the name of the DEPARTMENT he/she works
for:
RESULT FNAME,LNAME,DNAME
(T)
If the join attributes have the same names in both relations, they need not be specified and we
can write R R1 * R2.
Example: Retrieve each EMPLOYEE's name and the name of his/her SUPERVISOR:
SUPERVISOR(SUPERSSN,SFN,SLN) SSSN,FNAME,LNAME(EMPLOYEE)
T EMPLOYEE * SUPERVISOR
RESULT FNAME,LNAME,SFN,SLN
(T)
Note: In the original definition of NATURAL JOIN, the join attributes were required to have
the same names in both relations.
There can be a more than one set of join attributes with a different meaning between the same
two relations. For example:
JOIN ATTRIBUTES
RELATIONSHIP
DEPARTMENT.MGRSSN
the DEPARTMENT
Example: Retrieve each EMPLOYEE's name and the name of the DEPARTMENT he/she works
for:
T EMPLOYEE DNO=DNUMBER
DEPARTMENT
RESULT FNAME,LNAME,DNAME
(T)
EMPLOYEE(2).SSN EMPLOYEE(1)
One can think of this as joining two distinct copies of the relation, although only one relation
actually exists In this case, renaming can be useful.
Example: Retrieve each EMPLOYEE's name and the name of his/her SUPERVISOR:
SUPERVISOR(SSSN,SFN,SLN) SSN,FNAME,LNAME
(EMPLOYEE)
T EMPLOYEE SUPERSSN=SSSN
SUPERVISOR
RESULT FNAME,LNAME,SFN,SLN
(T)
All the operations discussed so far can be described as a sequence of only the operations
SELECT, PROJECT, UNION, SET DIFFERENCE, and CARTESIAN PRODUCT.
Hence, the set { , , , - , X } is called a complete set of relational algebra operations. An y
query language equivalent to these operations is called relationally complete.
For database applications, additional operations are needed that were not part of the original
relational algebra. These include:
AGGREGATE FUNCTIONS ( )
Functions such as SUM, COUNT, AVERAGE, MIN, MAX are often applied to sets of values or
sets of tuples in database applications
Example 1: Retrieve the average salary of all employees (no grouping needed):
Example 2: For each department, retrieve the department number, the number of employees, and
the average salary (in the department):
OUTER JOIN
When no matching tuples are found, nulls are placed for the
missing attributes
Q1: Retrieve the name and address of all employees who work for the ‘Research’
department.
ALL_EMPS m S SSN(EMPLOYEE)
EMPS_WITH_DEPS(SSN) m S ESSN(DEPENDENT)
Step 1: For each regular (strong) entity type E in the ER schema, create a relation R that
includes all the simple attributes of E.
EMPLOYEE
SSN Lname Fname
DEPARTMENT
NUMBER NAME
Step 2: For each weak entity type W in the ER schema with owner entity type E, create a
relation R, and include all simple attributes (or simple components of composite attributes) of W
as attributes. In addition, include as foreign key attributes of R the primary key attribute(s) of the
relation(s) that correspond to the owner entity type(s).
DEPENDENT
EMPL-SSN NAME Relationship
Step 3: For each binary 1:1 relationship type R in the ER schema, identify the relations S and T
that correspond to the entity types participating in R. Choose one of the relations, say S, and
include the primary key of T as a foreign key in S. Include all the simple attributes of R as
attributes of S.
DEPARTMENT
MANAGER-SSN StartDate
Step 4: For each regular binary 1:N relationship type R identify the relation (N) relation S.
Include the primary key of T as a foreign key of S. Simple attributes of R map to attributes of S.
EMPLOYEE
SupervisorSSN
Step 5: For each binary M:N relationship type R, create a relation S. Include the primary keys
of participant relations as foreign keys in S. Their combination will be the primary key for S.
Simple attributes of R become attributes of S.
WORKS-FOR
EmployeeSSN DeptNumber
Step 6: For each multi-valued attribute A, create a new relation R. This relation will include an
attribute corresponding to A, plus the primary key K of the parent relation (entity type or
relationship type) as a foreign key in R. The primary key of R is the combination of A and K.
DEP-LOCATION
Location DEP-NUMBER
Step 7: For each n-ary relationship type R, where n>2, create a new relation S to represent R.
Include the primary keys of the relations participating in R as foreign keys in S. Simple attributes
of R map to attributes of S. The primary key of S is a combination of all the foreign keys that
reference the participants that have cardinality constraint > 1.
UNIT 4
SQL The Relational Database Standard
SQL The Relational Database Standard
UNIT 4
x SQL allows a table (relation) to have two or more tuples that are identical in all their
attributes values. Hence, an SQL table is not a set of tuple, because a set does not allow
two identical members; rather it is a multiset of tuples.
x A basic query statement in SQL is the SELECT statement.
x The SELECT statement used in SQL has no relationship to the SELECT operation of
relational algebra.
Some example:
Query 0: Retrieve the birthday and address of the employee(s) whose name is ‘John B. Smith’
FROM EMPLOYEE
Query 1: Retrieve the name and address of all employee who work for the ‘Research’ Dept.
Query 2: For every project located in ‘Stafford’, list the project number, the controlling
department number, and the department manager’s last name, address, and birthdate.
Ambiguity in the case where attributes are same name need to qualify the attribute using DOT
separator
More Ambiguity in the case of queries that refer to the same relation twice
Query 8: For each employee, retrieve the employee’s first and last name and the first and last
name of his or her immediate supervisor
WHERE E.SUPERSSN=S.SSN
A missing WHEREclause indicates no conditions, which means all tuples are selected
In case of two or more table, then all possible tuple combinations are selected
Example: Q10: Select all EMPLOYEE SSNs , and all combinations of EMPLOYEE SSN and
DEPARTMENT DNAME
More
SELECT *
FROM EMPLOYEE
WHERE DNO=5
(name like ’%a_’) is true for all names having ‘a’ as second letter from the end.
x In order to list all employee who were born during 1960s we have the followings:
x SELECT FNAME, LNAME
. FROM EMPLOYEE
WHERE BDATE LIKE '6_______';
Examples: Show the resulting salaries if every employee working on the 'ProductX' project is
given a 10 percent raise.
Retrieve all employees in department number 5 whose salary between $30000 and $40000.
SELECT *
FROM EMPLOYEE
WHERE (SALARY BETWEEN 30000 AND 40000) AND DNO=5;
SQL does not delete duplicate because Duplicate elimination is an expensive operation (sort and
delete) user may be interested in the result of a query in case of aggregate function, we do not
want to eliminate duplicates
examples
Q11: Retrieve the salary of every employee , and (Q!2) all distinct salary values
FROM EMPLOYEE
FROM EMPLOYEE
Example: Q4: Make a list of Project numbers for projects that involve an employee whose last
name is ‘Smith’, either as a worker or as a manger of the department that controls the project
FROM PROJECT
Example:
FROM WORKS_ON
FROM WORKS_ON
WHERE SSN=‘123456789’
In addition to the IN operator, a number of other comparison operators can be used to compare a
single value v to a set of multiset V.
ALL V returns TRUE if v is greater than all the value in the set
Select the name of employees whose salary is greater than the salary of all the employees in
department 5
In general, any nested query involving the = or comparison operator IN can always be
rewritten as a single block query
Query 12: Retrieve the name of each employee who has a dependent with the same first name as
the employee.
Q12: SELECT E.FNAME, E.LNAME
FROM EMPLOYEE AS E
WHERE E.SSN IN (SELECT ESSN
FROM DEPENDENT
WHEREESSN=E.SSN AND
E.FNAME=DEPENDENT_NAME)
In Q12, the nested query has a different result for each tuple in the outer query.
The original SQL as specified for SYSTEM R also had a CONTAINS comparison operator,
which is used in conjunction with nested correlated queries This operator was dropped from the
language, possibly because of the difficulty in implementing it efficiently Most implementations
of SQL do not have this operator The CONTAINS operator compares two sets of values , and
returns TRUE if one set contains all values in the other set (reminiscent of the division operation
of algebra).
Query 3: Retrieve the name of each employee who works on all the projects controlled by
department number 5.
In Q3, the second nested query, which is not correlated with the outer query, retrieves the project
numbers of all projects controlled by department 5.
The first nested query, which is correlated, retrieves the project numbers on which the employee
works, which is different for each employee tuple because of the correlation.
EXISTS is used to check whether the result of a correlated nested query is empty (contains no
tuples) or not We can formulate Query 12 in an alternative form that uses EXISTS as Q12B
below.
Query 12: Retrieve the name of each employee who has a dependent with the same first name as
the employee.
FROM EMPLOYEE
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT *
FROM DEPENDENT
WHERESSN=ESSN)
In Q6, the correlated nested query retrieves all DEPENDENT tuples related to an EMPLOYEE
tuple. If none exist , the EMPLOYEE tuple is selected EXISTS is necessary for the expressive
power of SQL
It is also possible to use an explicit (enumerated) set of values in the WHEREclause rather than
a nested query Query 13: Retrieve the social security numbers of all employees who work on
project number 1, 2, or 3.
Null example
SQL allows queries that check if a value is NULL (missing or undefined or not applicable) SQL
uses IS or IS NOT to compare NULLs because it considers each NULL value distinct from other
NULL values, so equality comparison is not appropriate .
FROM EMPLOYEE
Note: If a join condition is specified, tuples with NULL values for the join attributes are not
included in the result
Join Revisit
Retrieve the name and address of every employee who works for ‘Search’ department
Aggregate Functions
Query 15: Find the sum of the salaries of all employees the ‘Research’ dept, and the max salary,
the min salary, and average:
FROM EMPLOYEE
Query 16: Find the maximum salary, the minimum salary, and the average salary among
employees who work for the 'Research' department.
Queries 17 and 18: Retrieve the total number of employees in the company (Q17), and the
number of employees in the 'Research' department (Q18).
Example of grouping
In many cases, we want to apply the aggregate functions to subgroups of tuples in a relation
Each subgroup of tuples consists of the set of tuples that have the same value for the grouping
attribute(s)
SQL has a GROUP BYclause for specifying the grouping attributes, which must also appear in
the SELECTclause
For each project, select the project number, the project name, and the number of employees
who work on that projet
WHERE PNUMBER=PNO
In Q20, the EMPLOYEE tuples are divided into groupseach group having the same value for the
grouping attribute DNO
The COUNT and AVG functions are applied to each such group of tuples separately.The
SELECTclause includes only the grouping attribute and the functions to be applied on each
group of tuples. A join condition can be used in conjunction with grouping
Query 21: For each project, retrieve the project number, project name, and the number of
employees who work on that project.
Q21: SELECT PNUMBER, PNAME, COUNT (*)
FROM PROJECT, WORKS_ON
WHERE PNUMBER=PNO
GROUP BY PNUMBER, PNAME
In this case, the grouping and functions are applied after the joining of the two
relations
THE HAVINGCLAUSE:
Sometimes we want to retrieve the values of these functions for only those groups that satisfy
certain conditions. The HAVINGclause is used for specifying a selection condition on groups
(rather than on individual tuples)
Query 22: For each project on which more than two employees work , retrieve the project
number, project name, and the number of employees who work on that project.
UNIT 5
SQL 2 The Relational Database Standard
More on Insert
WHERE LNAME=‘Brown’
Change the location and controlling department number of project number 10 to ‘Bellaire’ and 5
respectively
UPDATE PROJECT
Where PNUMBER=10;
More on View
WHERE DNUMBER=DNO
GROUP BY DNAME
More on view
FROM WORKS_ON1
WHERE PNMAE=‘PROJECTX’
More on View
Updating of Views
In general, an update on a view on defined on a single table w/o any aggregate functions can be
mapped to an update on the base table
More on Views
A view with a single defining table is updatable if we view contain PK or CK of the base table
Embedding SQL statements in a general purpose languages (C, C++, COBOL, PASCAL)
SQL can also be used in conjunction with a general purpose programming language, such as
PASCAL, COBOL, or PL/I. The programming language is called the host language. The
embedded SQL statement is distinguished from programming language statements by prefixing
it with a special character or command so that a preprocessor can extract the SQL statements. In
PL/I the keywords EXEC SQL precede any SQL statement. In some implementations, SQL
statements are passed as parameters in procedure calls. We will use PASCAL as the host
programming language, and a "$" sign to identify SQL statements in the program. Within an
embedded SQL command, we may refer to program variables, which are prefixed by a "%" sign.
The programmer should declare program variables to match the data types of the database
attributes that the program will process.These program variables may or may not have names
that are identical to their corresponding attributes.
Example: Write a program segment (loop) that reads a social security number and prints out
some information from the corresponding EMPLOYEE tuple
E1: LOOP:= 'Y';
while LOOP = 'Y' do
begin
writeln('input social security number:');
readln(SOC_SEC_NUM);
$SELECT FNAME, MINIT, LNAME, SSN, BDATE,
ADDRESS, SALARY
In E1, a single tuple is selected by the embedded SQL query; that is why we are able to assign
its attribute values directly to program variables. In general, an SQL query can retrieve many
tuples. The concept of a cursor is used to allow tupleatatime processing by the PASCAL
programCURSORS: We can think of a cursor as a pointer that points to a single tuple (row)
from the result of a query.The cursor is declared when the SQL query command is specified. A
subsequent OPEN cursor command fetches the query result and sets the cursor to a position
before the first row in the result of the query; this becomes the current row for the cursor.
Subsequent FETCH commands in the program advance the cursor to the next row and copy its
attribute values into PASCAL program variables specified in the FETCH command. An implicit
variable SQLCODE communicates to the program the status of SQL embedded commands. An
SQLCODE of 0 (zero) indicates successful execution. Different codes are returned to indicate
exceptions and errors. A special END_OF_CURSOR code is used to terminate a loop over the
tuples in a query result. A CLOSE cursor command is issued to indicate that we are done with
the result of the query
When a cursor is defined for rows that are to be updated the clause FOR UPDATE OF must be
in the cursor declaration, and a list of the names of any attributes that will be updated
follows.The condition WHERE CURRENT OF cursor specifies that the current tuple is the one
to be updated (or deleted)
Example: Write a program segment that reads (inputs) a department name, then lists the names
of employees who work in that department, one at a time. The program reads a raise amount for
each employee and updates the employee's salary by that amount.
begin
writeln('employee name: ', E.FNAME, E.MINIT, E.LNAME);
writeln('enter raise amount: '); readln(RAISE);
$UPDATE EMPLOYEE SET SALARY = SALARY + %RAISE
WHERE CURRENT OF EMP;
$FETCH EMP INTO %E.SSN, %E.FNAME, %E.MINIT,
%E.LNAME, %E.SAL;
end;
$CLOSE CURSOR EMP;
Objective:
To access a database from an application program (as opposed to interactive
interfaces)
Why?
An interactive interface is convenient but not sufficient
A majority of database operations are made thru application programs
(increasingly thru web applications)
Embedded commands:
Database commands are embedded in a general-purpose programming language
Library of database functions:
Available to the host language for database calls; known as an API
API standards for Application Program Interface
A brand new, full-fledged language
Minimizes impedance mismatch
Impedance Mismatch
Incompatibilities between a host programming language and the database model, e.g.,
type mismatch and incompatibilities; requires a new binding for each language
set vs. record-at-a-time processing
need special iterators to loop over query results and manipulate individual
values
Client program opens a connection to the database server
Client program submits queries to and/or updates the database
When database access is no longer needed, client program closes (terminates) the
connection
int loop;
AUTHORIZATION user-account-info;
Disconnection
DISCONNECT connection-name;
loop = 1;
while (loop) {
EXEC SQL
END-EXEC
Composing and executing new (not previously compiled) SQL statements at run-time
varchar sqlupdatestring[256];
EXECUTE sqlcommand;
Environment record:
Keeps track of database connections
Connection record:
Keep tracks of info needed for a particular connection
Statement record:
Keeps track of info needed for one SQL statement
Description record:
Keeps track of tuples
Load SQL/CLI libraries
Declare record handle variables for the above components (called: SQLHSTMT,
SQLHDBC, SQLHENV, SQLHDEC)
Set up an environment record using SQLAllocHandle
Set up a connection record using SQLAllocHandle
Set up a statement record using SQLAllocHandle
Prepare a statement using SQL/CLI function SQLPrepare
Bound parameters to program variables
Execute SQL statement via SQLExecute
Bound query columns to a C variable via SQLBindCol
Use SQLFetch to retrieve column values into C variables
A stored procedure
local-declarations
procedure-body;
A stored function
local-declarations
function-body;
SQL/PSM:
Part of the SQL standard for writing persistent stored modules
SQL + stored procedures/functions + additional programming constructs
E.g., branching and looping statements
Enhance the power of SQL
RETURNS VARCHAR[7]
ENDIF;
UNIT 6
Data Base design-1
6.3 Normalization
Specifies how to interpret the attributes values stored in a tuple of the relation. In other words,
how the attribute value in a tuple relate to one another.
Guideline 1: Design a relation schema so that it is easy to explain its meaning. Do not combine
attributes from multiple entity types and relationship types into a single relation.
Reducing redundant values in tuples. Save storage space and avoid update anomalies.
x Insertion anomalies.
x Deletion anomalies.
x Modification anomalies.
Insertion Anomalies
To insert a new employee tuple into EMP_DEPT, we must include either the attribute values for
that department that the employee works for, or nulls.
It's difficult to insert a new department that has no employee as yet in the EMP_DEPT relation.
The only way to do this is to place null values in the attributes for employee. This causes a
problem because SSN is the primary key of EMP_DEPT, and each tuple is supposed to represent
an employee entity - not a department entity.
Deletion Anomalies
If we delete from EMP_DEPT an employee tuple that happens to represent the last employee
working for a particular department, the information concerning that department is lost from the
database.
Modification Anomalies
In EMP_DEPT, if we change the value of one of the attributes of a particular department- say the
manager of department 5- we must update the tuples of all employees who work in that
department.
Guideline 2: Design the base relation schemas so that no insertion, deletion, or modification
anomalies occur. Reducing the null values in tuples. e.g., if 10% of employees have offices, it is
better to have a separate relation, EMP_OFFICE, rather than an attribute OFFICE_NUMBER in
EMPLOYEE.
Guideline 3: Avoid placing attributes in a base relation whose values are mostly null.
Disallowing spurious tuples.
Spurious tuples - tuples that are not in the original relation but generated by natural join of
decomposed subrelations.
Fig. 14.5a
Guideline 4: Design relation schemas so that they can be naturally JOINed on primary keys or
foreign keys in a way that guarantees no spurious tuples are generated.
6.2 A functional dependency (FD) is a constraint between two sets of attributes from the
database. It is denoted by
X Y
We say that "Y is functionally dependent on X". Also, X is called the left-hand side of the FD.
Y is called the right-hand side of the FD.
means that the dependency does not hold any more; otherwise, it is a partial functional
dependency.
Examples:
1. SSN ENAME
2. PNUMBER {PNAME, PLOCATION}
3. {SSN, PNUMBER} HOURS
The FD X Y holds on R if and only if for all possible relations r(R), whenever two tuples of r
agree on the attributes of X, they also agree on the attributes of Y.
meaning that using IR1 through IR3 repeatedly to infer dependencies until no more
dependencies can be inferred results in the complete set of all possible dependencies that
can be inferred from F. In other words, given a set of FDs, all implied FDs can be derived
using these 3 rules.
Closure of a Set of Functional Dependencies
Given a set X of FDs in relation R, the set of all FDs that are implied by X is called the
closure of X, and is denoted X+.
X+ := X;
repeat
oldX+ := X+
for each FD Y Z in F do
if Y X+ then X+ := X+ Z;
Example:
A BC
E CF
B E
CD EF
Compute {A, B}+ of the set of attributes under this set of FDs.
Solution:
Go round the inner loop 4 time, once for each of the given FDs.
On the first iteration, for A BC
A {A, B}+
{A, B}+ := {A, B, C}.
Go round the inner loop 4 times again. On the first iteration result does not change; on the
second it expands to {A,B,C,E,F}; On the third and forth it does not change.
Now go round the inner loop 4 times. Closure does not change and so the whole process
terminates, with
{A,B}+ = {A,B,C,E,F}
Example.
{PNUMBER}+ = ?
{SSN,PNUMBER}+ = ?
6.3 Normalization
Main objective in developing a logical data model for relational database systems is to create an
accurate representation of the data, its relationships, and constraints. To achieve this objective,
we must identify a suitable set of relations. A technique for producing a set of relations with
desirable properties, given the data requirements of an enterprise
NORMAL FORMS
A relation is defined as a set of tuples. By definition, all elements of a set are distinct; hence, all
tuples in a relation must also be distinct. This means that no two tuples can have the same
combination of values for all their attributes.
Any set of attributes of a relation schema is called a superkey. Every relation has at least one
superkey—the set of all its attributes. A key is a minimal superkey, i.e., a superkey from which
we cannot remove any attribute and still have the uniqueness constraint hold.
In general, a relation schema may have more than one key. In this case, each of the keys is called
a candidate key. It is common to designate one of the candidate keys as the primary key of the
relation. A foreign key is a key in a relation R but it's not a key (just an attribute) in other
relation R' of the same schema.
Integrity Constraints
The entity integrity constraint states that no primary key value can be null. This is because the
primary key value is used to identify individual tuples in a relation; having null values for the
primary key implies that we cannot identify some tuples.
The referential integrity constraint is specified between two relations and is used to maintain
the consistency among tuples of the two relations. Informally, the referential integrity constraint
states that a tuple in one relation that refers to another relation must refer to an existing tuple in
that relation.
The goal of normalization is to create a set of relational tables that are free of redundant data and
that can be consistently and correctly modified. This means that all tables in a relational database
should be in the in the third normal form (3 NF).
First normal form is now considered to be part of the formal definition of a relation; historically,
it was defined to disallow multivalued attributes, composite attributes, and their combinations. It
states that the domains of attributes must include only atomic (simple, indivisible) values and
that the value of any attribute in a tuple must be a single value from the domain of that attribute.
Practical Rule: "Eliminate Repeating Groups," i.e., make a separate table for each set of related
attributes, and give each table a primary key.
Formal Definition: A relation is in first normal form (1NF) if and only if all underlying simple
domains contain atomic values only.
Second normal form is based on the concept of fully functional dependency. A functional X Y
is a fully functional dependency is removal of any attribute A from X means that the dependency
does not hold any more. A relation schema is in 2NF if every nonprime attribute in relation is
fully functionally dependent on the primary key of the relation. It also can be restated as: a
relation schema is in 2NF if every nonprime attribute in relation is not partially dependent on any
key of the relation.
Practical Rule: "Eliminate Redundant Data," i.e., if an attribute depends on only part of a
multivalued key, remove it to a separate table.
Formal Definition: A relation is in second normal form (2NF) if and only if it is in 1NF and
every nonkey attribute is fully dependent on the primary key.
Third normal form is based on the concept of transitive dependency. A functional dependency
X Y in a relation is a transitive dependency if there is a set of attributes Z that is not a subset
of any key of the relation, and both X Z and Z Y hold. In other words, a relation is in 3NF
if, whenever a functional dependency
X A holds in the relation, either (a) X is a superkey of the relation, or (b) A is a prime
attribute of the relation.
Practical Rule: "Eliminate Columns not Dependent on Key," i.e., if attributes do not contribute to
a description of a key, remove them to a separate table.
Formal Definition: A relation is in third normal form (3NF) if and only if it is in 2NF and every
nonkey attribute is nontransitively dependent on the primary key.
2NF: R is in 2 NF iff R is in 1NF and every nonkey attribute is fully dependent on the key.
3NF: R is in 3NF iff R is 2NF and every nonkey attribute is non-transitively dependent on the
key.
Additional criteria may be needed to ensure the the set of relations in a relational database are
satisfactory.
{CITY,STREET } ZIP
ZIP CITY
x Insertion anomaly: the city of a zip code can’t be stored, if the street is not given
Normalization
UNIT 7
Data base design 2
Normalization Algorithms based on FDs to synthesize 3NF and BCNF describe two desirable
properties (known as properties of decomposition).
x Dependency Preservation Property
x Lossless join property
Dependency Preservation Property enables us to enforce a constraint on the original relation
from corresponding instances in the smaller relations.
Lossless join property enables us to find any instance of the original relation from
corresponding instances in the smaller relations (Both used by the design algorithms to achieve
desirable decompositions).
A property of decomposition, which ensures that no spurious rows are generated when relations
are reunited through a natural join operation.
Individual relations being in higher normal do not guarantee a good deign Database schema must
posses additional properties to guarantee a good design.
Suppose R = { A1, A2, …, An} that includes all the attributes of the database. R is a universal
relation schema, which states that every attribute name is unique. Using FDs, the algorithms
decomposes the universal relation schema R into a set of relation schemas
D = {R1, R2, …, Rn} that will become the relational database schema; D is called a
decomposition of R. Each attribute in R will appear in at least one relation schema Ri in the
decomposition so that no attributes are lost; we have
We would like to check easily that updates to the database do not result in illegal relations being
created.
It would be nice if our design allowed us to check updates without having to compute natural
joins. To know whether joins must be computed, we need to determine what functional
dependencies may be tested by checking each relation individually.
i.e., the union of the dependencies that hold on each Ri belongs to D be equivalent to closure of F (all possible FDs)
/*Decompose relation, R, with functional dependencies, into relations, R1,..., Rn, with associated
functional dependencies,
F1,..., Fk.
F+=(F1�...� k)+ */
F
If each functional dependency specified in F either appeared directly in one of the relation
schema R in the decomposition D or could be inferred from the dependencies that appear in
some R.
A property of decomposition, which ensures that no spurious rows are generated when relations
are reunited through a natural join operation.
Lossless-join property refers to when we decompose a relation into two relations - we can rejoin
the resulting relations to produce the original relation.
Decompose relation, R, with functional dependencies, F, into relations, R1 and R2, with
attributes, A1 and A2, and associated functional dependencies, F1 and F2.
R A B C A,B A B B,C B C
a1 b1 c1 a1 b1 b1 c1
a2 b2 c2 a2 b2 b2 c2
a3 b1 c3 a3 b1 b1 c3
x Old tables should be derivable from the newer ones through the natural join operation
A,B(R) B,C(R) A B C
a1 b1 c1
a2 b2 c2
a3 b1 c3
a1 b1 c3
a3 b1 c1
x Wrong!
x R1, R2 is a lossless join decomposition of R iff the attributes common to R1 and R2
contain a key for at least one of the involved relations
R A B C A,B A B B,C B C
a1 b1 c1 a1 b1 b1 c1
a2 b2 c2 a2 b2 b2 c2
a3 b1 c1 a3 b1
x A,B(R) B,C(R) =B
x A1�A2�A2 \A1 is in F+
However, sometimes there is the requirement to decompose a relation into more than two
relations. Although rare, these cases are managed by join dependency and 5NF.
MVD represents a dependency between attributes (for example, A, B, and C) in a relation, such
that for each value of A there is a set of values for B, and a set of values for C. However, the set
of values for B and C are independent of each other.
MVD between attributes A, B, and C in a relation using the following notation
A ���� B (A multidetermines B)
A ���� C
t3[X]=t4[X]=t1[X]=t2[X]
A relation that is in Boyce-Codd Normal Form and contains no MVDs. BCNF to 4NF involves
the removal of the MVD from the relation by placing the attribute(s) in a new relation along with
a copy of the determinant(s).
A join dependency (JD), denoted by JD{R1, R2, …, Rn}, specified on relation schema R,
specifies a constraint on the states r of R. The constraint states that every legal state r of R should
have a lossless join decomposition into R1, R2, …, Rn; that is, for every such r we have
* (SR1(r), (SR2(r) … (SRn(r)) = r
Lossless-join property refers to when we decompose a relation into two relations - we can rejoin
the resulting relations to produce the original relation. However, sometimes there is the
requirement to decompose a relation into more than two relations. Although rare, these cases are
managed by join dependency and 5NF.
The idea behind template dependencies is to specify a template—or example—that defines each
constraint or dependency. There are two types of templates: tuple-generating templates and
constraint-generating templates. A template consists of a number of hypothesis tuples that are
meant to show an example of the tuples that may appear in one or more relations. The other part
of the template is the template conclusion. For tuple-generating templates, the conclusion is a set
of tuples that must also exist in the relations if the hypothesis tuples are there. For constraint-
generating templates, the template conclusion is a condition that must hold on the hypothesis
tuples.
The idea behind domain-key normal form (DKNF) is to specify (theoretically, at least) the
"ultimate normal form" that takes into account all possible types of dependencies and constraints.
A relation is said to be in DKNF if all constraints and dependencies that should hold on the
relation can be enforced simply by enforcing the domain constraints and key constraints on the
relation.
However, because of the difficulty of including complex constraints in a DKNF relation, its
practical utility is limited, since it may be quite difficult to specify general integrity constraints.
For example, consider a relation CAR(MAKE, VIN#) (where VIN# is the vehicle identification
number) and another relation MANUFACTURE(VIN#, COUNTRY) (where COUNTRY is the
country of manufacture). A general constraint may be of the following form: "If the MAKE is
either Toyota or Lexus, then the first character of the VIN# is a "J" if the country of manufacture
is Japan; if the MAKE is Honda or Acura, the second character of the VIN# is a "J" if the
country of manufacture is Japan." There is no simplified way to represent such constraints short
of writing a procedure (or general assertions) to test them.
UNIT 8
Data base design 2
x A DBMS is single-user id at most one user at a time can use the system, and it is
multiuser if many users can use the system—and hence access the database—
concurrently.
x Most DBMS are multiuser (e.g., airline reservation system).
x Multiprogramming operating systems allow the computer to execute multiple programs
(or processes) at the same time (having one CPU, concurrent execution of processes is
actually interleaved).
x If the computer has multiple hardware processors (CPUs), parallel processing of multiple
processes is possible.
x A transaction is a logical unit of database processing that includes one or more database
access operations (e.g., insertion, deletion, modification, or retrieval operations). The
database operations that form a transaction can either be embedded within an application
program or they can be specified interactively via a high-level query language such as
SQL. One way of specifying the transaction boundaries is by specifying explicit begin
transaction and end transaction statements in an application program; in this case, all
database access operations between the two are considered as forming one transaction. A
single application program may contain more than one transaction if it contains several
transaction boundaries. If the database operations in a transaction do not update the
database but only retrieve data, the transaction is called a read-only transaction.
x Read-only transaction - do not changes the state of a database, only retrieves data.
x The basic database access operations that a transaction can include are as follows:
This problem occurs when two transactions that access the same database items have
their operations interleaved in a way that makes the value of some database item
incorrect. Suppose that transactions T1 and T2 are submitted at approximately the same
time, and suppose that their operations are interleaved then the final value of item X is
incorrect, because T2 reads the value of X before T1 changes it in the database, and
hence the updated value resulting from T1 is lost. For example, if X = 80 at the start
(originally there were 80 reservations on the flight), N = 5 (T1 transfers 5 seat
reservations from the flight corresponding to X to the flight corresponding to Y), and M
= 4 (T2 reserves 4 seats on X), the final result should be X = 79; but in the interleaving of
operations, it is X = 84 because the update in T1 that removed the five seats from X was
lost.
This problem occurs when one transaction updates a database item and then the
transaction fails for some reason. The updated item is accessed by another transaction
before it is changed back to its original value. Figure 19.03(b) shows an example where
T1 updates item X and then fails before completion, so the system must change X back to
its original value. Before it can do so, however, transaction T2 reads the "temporary"
value of X, which will not be recorded permanently in the database because of the failure
of T1. The value of item X that is read by T2 is called dirty data, because it has been
created by a transaction that has not completed and committed yet; hence, this problem is
also known as the dirty read problem.
Another problem that may occur is called unrepeatable read, where a transaction T
reads an item twice and the item is changed by another transaction T' between the two
reads. Hence, T receives different values for its two reads of the same item. This may
occur, for example, if during an airline reservation transaction, a customer is inquiring
about seat availability on several flights. When the customer decides on a particular
flight, the transaction then reads the number of seats on that flight a second time before
completing the reservation.
successfully and their effect is recorded permanently in the database, or (2) the
transaction has no effect whatsoever on the database or on any other transactions. The
DBMS must not permit some operations of a transaction T to be applied to the database
while other operations of T are not. This may happen if a transaction fails after executing
some of its operations but before executing all of them.
Types of Failures
Failures are generally classified as transaction, system, and media failures. There are
several possible reasons for a transaction to fail in the middle of execution:
Failures of types 1, 2, 3, and 4 are more common than those of types 5 or 6. Whenever a
failure of type 1 through 4 occurs, the system must keep sufficient information to recover
from the failure. Disk failure or other catastrophic failures of type 5 or 6 do not happen
frequently; if they do occur, recovery is a major task.
A transaction is an atomic unit of work that is either completed in its entirety or not done
at all. For recovery purposes, the system needs to keep track of when the transaction
starts, terminates, and commits or aborts (see below). Hence, the recovery manager keeps
track of the following operations:
Figure 19.04 shows a state transition diagram that describes how a transaction moves
through its execution states. A transaction goes into an active state immediately after it
starts execution, where it can issue READ and WRITE operations. When the transaction
ends, it moves to the partially committed state. At this point, some recovery protocols
need to ensure that a system failure will not result in an inability to record the changes of
the transaction permanently (usually by recording changes in the system log ). Once this
check is successful, the transaction is said to have reached its commit point and enters the
committed state. Once a transaction is committed, it has concluded its execution
successfully and all its changes must be recorded permanently in the database.
x To be able to recover from failures that affect transactions, the system maintains a log to
keep track of all transactions that affect the values of database items.
x Log records consists of the following information (T refers to a unique transaction_id):
1. [start_transaction, T]: Indicates that transaction T has started execution.
2. [write_item, T,X,old_value,new_value]: Indicates that transaction T has changed
the value of database item X from old_value to new_value.
3. [read_item, T,X]: Indicates that transaction T has read the value of database item
X.
4. [commit,T]: Indicates that transaction T has completed successfully, and affirms
that its effect can be committed (recorded permanently) to the database.
5. [abort,T]: Indicates that transaction T has been aborted.
Transactions should possess several properties. These are often called the ACID properties, and
they should be enforced by the concurrency control and recovery methods of the DBMS. The
following are the ACID properties:
A schedule (or history) S of n transactions T1, T2, ..., Tn is an ordering of the operations of the
transactions subject to the constraint that, for each transaction Ti that participates in S, the
operations of Ti in S must appear in the same order in which they occur in Ti. Note, however,
that operations from other transactions Tj can be interleaved with the operations of Ti in S. For
now, consider the order of operations in S to be a total ordering, although it is possible
theoretically to deal with schedules whose operations form partial orders.
Similarly, the schedule for Figure 19.03(b), which we call Sb, can be written as follows, if we
assume that transaction T1 aborted after its read_item(Y) operation:
Two operations in a schedule are said to conflict if they satisfy all three of the following
conditions:
A schedule S of n transactions T1, T2, ..., Tn, is said to be a complete schedule if the following
conditions hold:
1. The operations in S are exactly those operations in T1, T2, ..., Tn, including a commit or
abort operation as the last operation for each transaction in the schedule.
2. For any pair of operations from the same transaction Ti, their order of appearance in S is
the same as their order of appearance in Ti.
3. For any two conflicting operations, one of the two must occur before the other in the
schedule.
once a transaction T is committed, it should never be necessary to roll back T. The schedules that
theoretically meet this criterion are called recoverable schedules and those that do not are called
nonrecoverable, and hence should not be permitted.
A schedule S is recoverable if no transaction T in S commits until all transactions T' that have
written an item that T reads have committed. A transaction T reads from transaction T in a
schedule S if some item X is first written by and later read by T. In addition, should not
have been aborted before T reads item X, and there should be no transactions that write X after
writes it and before T reads it (unless those transactions, if any, have aborted before T reads
X).
Consider the schedule given below, which is the same as schedule except that two
commit operations have been added to :
is not recoverable, because T2 reads item X from T1, and then T2 commits before T1
commits. If T1 aborts after the c2 operation in , then the value of X that T2 read is no longer
valid and T2 must be aborted after it had been committed, leading to a schedule that is not
recoverable. For the schedule to be recoverable, the c2 operation in must be postponed until
after T1 commits. If T1 aborts instead of committing, then T2 should also abort as shown in Se,
because the value of X it read is no longer valid.
Serializability of Schedules
x If no interleaving of operations is permitted, there are only two possible arrangement for
transactions T1 and T2.
1. Execute all the operations of T1 (in sequence) followed by all the operations of
T2 (in sequence).
2. Execute all the operations of T2 (in sequence) followed by all the operations of
T1
x A schedule S is serial if, for every transaction T all the operations of T are executed
consecutively in the schedule.
x A schedule S of n transactions is serializable if it is equivalent to some serial schedule of
the same n transactions.
EXEC SQL INSERT INTO EMPLOYEE (FNAME, LNAME, SSN, DNO, SALARY)
VALUES ('Jabbar', 'Ahmad', '998877665', 2, 44000);
EXEC SQL UPDATE EMPLOYEE
SET SALARY = SALARY * 1.1 WHERE DNO = 2;
EXEC SQL COMMIT;
GOTO THE_END;
UNDO: EXEC SQL ROLLBACK;
THE_END: . . . ;