Fish Diversity and CPUE in Eleyele Lake
Fish Diversity and CPUE in Eleyele Lake
net/publication/378591890
Species diversity and catch per unit effort of fish in a perturbed tropical lake,
Ibadan, Nigeria
CITATIONS READS
0 274
5 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Adedolapo Abeke Ayoade on 29 February 2024.
Abstract
Eleyele Lake serves the purpose of domestic water supply, transportation, and fisheries; therefore, it is a source of food and livelihood
to the artisanal fishers in Ibadan. However, various reports indicated the perturbed state of the lake, which can have adverse effects on
the ecosystem services including fisheries. Therefore, this study investigated the catch per unit effort (CPUE) of fish in the Eleyele Lake
and some physicochemical parameters in order to establish the status of the fisheries of the lake. Water samples were collected from
the lake and analyzed. The fish catches, effective fishing effort (EFF), and CPUE of the lake were determined. The dissolved oxygen and
transparency levels were not within the recommended permissible limits. Fish encountered in the lake during the study period belong
to nine families and fifteen species. Cichlidae, Polypteridae, and Clariidae were the most frequently encountered families. Shannon-
Weiner (2.23), Margalef (2.14) diversity indices, and Evenness (0.87) were highest during the sampling period in 2019. The EFF was
0.37 kW day−1. The mean CPUE increased from 9.55 ± 1.67 kg·kW day−1 in 2019 to 38.07 ± 30.89 kg·kW day−1 in 2021 and declined to
6.44 ± 3.02 kg·kW day−1 in 2023. The forage /carnivore ratio was 0.70 in 2019, 0.35 in 2021, and 54 in 2023 by number indicating an
imbalance in the fish population. This study implies that effective management and sustainable exploitation of the fisheries in the
Eleyele Lake require improvement of water quality and enforcement of a closed season.
Citation: Ayoade AA, Owolabi OM, Patience OT, Adeduntan OR, Kujooro P. Species diversity and catch per unit effort of fish in a
perturbed tropical lake, Ibadan, Nigeria. Academia Biology 2024;2. https://doi.org/10.20935/AcadBiol6164
1. Introduction
Inland fish and fisheries provide food and source of livelihood for Globally, fish and Other Aquatic Food (OAF) consumption has
millions of people globally. They are essential to the achievement increased to 20.2 kg per capita in 2020, which is more than
of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) including SDGs 1 double the consumption rate 50 years ago [4]. Variations in
(No Poverty), 2 (Zero Hunger), 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), 12 consumption occur between continents, highest in Asia (24.5 kg
(Responsible Consumption and Production), and 15 (Life on Land) per capita) and least in Africa (10.1 kg per capita) [4]. In Africa,
[1]. Inland fishes comprise approximately 40% of all fish species fish and OAF consumption habits differ: eleven countries,
and 20% of all vertebrate species [2]. It is estimated that the annual including Ghana, Egypt, and Sierra Leone, had a higher con-
production of fisheries from inland waters contributed 12% of the sumption than the world average [9]. The remaining African
total global fisheries production [3, 4]. Inland fisheries (both countries including Nigeria (13.3 kg capita−1) had relatively low
aquaculture and capture fisheries) contribute over 40% of the consumption of fish and other aquatic foods. This could be due
world’s capture finfish fisheries and aquaculture production to a variety of reasons including high population growth (demand
(excluding plants, mammals, crustaceans, echinoderms, and greater than supply) and under-recorded contribution of small-
mollusks) [5]. Global inland fish production reached 63.3 million scale fisheries [9].
tonnes in 2018 as per FAO 2020. The trend in global-aggregated
The total fish production in Nigeria is close to one million metric
catch indicates that inland fisheries catch has risen more or less
tons: 305,000 metric tons from aquaculture and 759,828 metric
linearly over the past 20 years increasing by 222,000 tonnes, or
tons from coastal and inland fisheries ([10], WorldFish Center).
2.3%, per year (1996–2016; [6]). It has been pointed out that the
Most fish harvested in Nigeria are captured by small-scale
perceived increase in the catches can partially be attributed to
capture fisheries (99%) and large-scale capture fisheries have
improved reporting and assessment at the country level rather
only 1%. Nigeria has over 14 million hectares of inland waters and
than entirely due to increased fish production. The world’s inland
Nigeria’s inland fisheries provide approximately 40% of the
fisheries are affected by negative factors including overexploita-
fisheries catch, thus it’s a principal contributor to food security in
tion, habitat destruction (damming, water abstraction), pollution,
the country. However, illegal, unreported, and unrecorded
exotic invasions, and climate change [7, 8].
1Hydrobiology and Fisheries Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, 200005, Nigeria.
*email: [email protected]
fishing occurs in inland water bodies, likewise, environmental enhance national food security and the livelihood of the fishing
degradation and overfishing have a negative impact on community.
freshwater ecosystem services [11, 12]. Inland fisheries in Nigeria
are also affected by high rates of deforestation [13], given that the
forest plays an important role in protecting these freshwater 2. Materials and methods
habitats. Byrd et al. [12] also reported that species-level catch is 2.1. Study area
severely lacking in Nigeria, which hinders analyses of both
nutrient contribution and economic access to specific fish The Eleyele Lake is situated upstream on River Ona, in the city of
species. For sustainable management and conservation of inland Ibadan within geographical coordinates: Latitude 7°20′–7°25′N
fisheries resources, information on the catch statistics and efforts and Longitude 3°51′–3°56′E. It falls within the Ido Local
of inland waters is required. Catch per unit effort (CPUE) is often Government Area of Oyo State (Figure 1). The lake has a length
used as a first-order evaluation of broad trends in likely relative of 240 m across the dam, catchments area of 323.7 sq km. The
abundance or relative biomass trends over time of the underlying lake is 125 m above sea level with an average depth of 6.0 m [19].
fish stocks [14, 15]. According to Stamatopoulos [16], CPUE The surrounding area of the reservoir is made up of light forest
despite its limitation can be applied where fish catch data were with a wetland margin around the perimeter of the lake. The
not available and stock assessments do not exist and where vegetation on the shoreline of the lake is a lowland rainforest,
restrictive fisheries management actions may be absent or composed of trees, shrubs, herbs, and grasses. The study area has
ineffective. Eleyele Lake, located in Ibadan, serves as a source of two major climatic seasons: the dry season (November to March)
drinking water, fisheries, and transportation. Open water access and the rainy season (April to October). Economic trees like
fisheries is practiced and there are some reports on the lake’s Carica papaya (Pawpaw), Mangifera indica (Mango), Elaeis
environment being degraded (including [17, 18]). Fishers at the guineensis (Palm), Anacardium occidentale (Cashew), Musa
Eleyele Lake also complained of low fish catch (Ayoade, personal acuminate (wild banana) [17] were observed in the study area.
communication). Therefore, this study was conducted to Eleyele Lake serves the purpose of domestic water supply,
determine species diversity, CPUE, and some water quality fishery, irrigation, and transportation. Various activities occur-
parameters, due to little or no information on the current status ring in its catchment area include automobile repair, cement
of fish stock and fisheries of the lake. This will lead to its making, dumping of wastes from surrounding residences, reli-
sustainable management and improved fish production that will gious worship centers, farming, and cassava processing.
2.2. Field sampling total dissolved solids (TDS), and conductivity were determined
Water samples were collected monthly between 7.30 a.m. and in situ with a water quality meter probe SPER scientific
10.00 a.m. at the sampling station (close to a residential area AZ86031 model (AZ Instrument Corp, Taichung City, Taiwan).
and where boats are anchored) in triplicates from 2019 to 2023 Transparency was measured in situ using a Secchi disc, which
in both the rainy season and dry season months (October 2019– is a white circular weighted disc with a diameter of 20 cm; it
January 2020, March 2021–August 2021, and December 2022– was allowed to sink slowly on a marked line until it disappeared
May 2023) using 250 mL plastic bottles. Physicochemical then raised until it reappeared, and the average of the two
parameters such as temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), depths at which the disc disappeared (D1) and the depth at
May, a wet season month, and the least in February (1.05 kg), a declined sharply to 6.44 ± 3.02 kg·kW day−1 in 2023 (Table 2).
dry season month. The mean CPUE increased from 9.55 ± 1.67 The CPUE differed significantly between the year 2021 and 2023
kg·kW day−1 in 2019 to 38.07 ± 30.89 kg·kW day−1 in 2021 and sampling periods (F = 6.23, P = 0.032).
October 27.8 ± 0.02 309.0 ± 4.15 48.75 ± 9.13 221.0 ± 4.78 2.46 ± 0.45 NT
November 28.9 ± 0.13 292.0 ± 2.11 131 ± 11.30 197.0 ± 1.69 2.67 ± 0.69 NT
December 29.5 ± 0.07 349.5 ± 7.29 158.5 ± 21.7 242.0 ± 5.09 3.23 ± 0.37 NT
January 26.2 ± 0.38 328.0 ± 2.89 74.25 ± 8.45 229.0 ± 6.24 4.85 ± 0.81 NT
Mean ± SD 28.1 ± 1.45 319.6 ± 24.8 103.13 ± 50.4 222.25 ± 18.9 3.3 ± 1.4 NT
2021
March 29.73 ± 0.87 346.75 ± 2.59 97 ± 18.90 173.75 ± 1.30 3.93 ± 1.36 7.54 ± 0.39
April 30.13 ± 0.28 378.8 ± 2.95 40.5 ± 8.32 189.75 ± 2.28 4.68 ± 0.72 7.24 ± 0.23
May 28.53 ± 0.26 389 ± 2.74 40.75 ± 4.97 194.5 ± 1.12 3.33 ±.50 6.78 ± 0.14
June 27.43 ± 0.80 417.5 ± 9.29 32.13 ± 3.21 207.75 ± 5.4 2.3 ± 0.51 7.10 ± 0.2
July 26.28 ± 0.23 382.75 ± 10.5 30.75 ± 4.91 191.25 ± 5.54 2.5 ± 0.55 6.71 ± 0.33
August 26.15 ± 0.09 339 ± 3.54 28.69 ± 4.46 170.25 ± 1.30 4.05 ± 1.43 6.45 ± 0.35
Mean ± SD 28.04 ± 1.07 375.65 ± 28.87 44.97 ± 25.99 188.17 ± 13.47 3.47 ± 0.93 6.97 ± 0.40
2022/2023
December 26.0 ± 0.04 310.0 ± 2.10 NT 228.01 ± 0.8 3.5 ± 0.05 6.6 ± 0.23
January 24.0 ± 0.01 250.1 ± 1.01 18.5 ± 3.1 250.1 ± 0.11 2.8 ± 0.03 6.4 ± 0.31
February 26.03 ± 0.03 270.2 ± 0.21 23.8 ± 1.01 196.13 ± 0.1 4.6 ± 0.12 6.2 ± 0.01
March 24.5 ± 0.41 290.31 ± 0.24 22.12 ± 0.21 212.13 ± 0.3 5.4 ± 0.2 6.8 ± 0.13
April 24.6 ± 0.11 280.12 ± 1.34 25.03 ± 0.13 200.3 ± 0.31 2.9 ± 0.05 7.4 ± 0.21
May 27.3 ± 0.34 270.15 ± 2.37 23.8 ± 1.11 194.6 ± 1.2 4.24 ± 0.1 6.8 ± 0.01
Mean ± SD 25.27 ± 1.24 278.33 ± 20.4 22.62 ± 2.54 202.5 ± 15.28 3.91 ± 1.02 6.7 ± 0.41
Figure 2 • (a) Percent (%) weight and (b) percent (%) number of fish families in the Eleyele Lake during the study period.
Figure 3 • (a) Percent weight and (b) percent number of fish species in the Eleyele Lake from 2019 to 2023. H. fasciatus—Hemichromis
fasciatus; C. zillii—Coptodon zillii; C. guineensis—Coptodon guineensis; Ch. Guentheri—Chromidotilapia guentheri; O. niloticus—
Oreochromis niloticus; S. melanotheron—Sarotherodon melanotheron; S. galilaeus—Sarotherodon galilaeus; P. senegalus—Polypterus
senegalus; H. odoe—Hepsetus odoe; S. mystus—Schilbe mystus; C. gariepinus—Clarias gariepinus; L. niloticus—Lates niloticus; P.
obscura—Parachanna obscura; G. niloticus—Gymnarchus niloticus.
Figure 4 • Diversity indices of the fish species in Eleyele Lake during the study period.
Table 2 • The catch per unit effort (CPUE) analysis of small-scale fisheries in Eleyele Lake
Year/ Number Boat capacity NFE No. of days for EFE (kW Total catch (fish- CPUE (kg·k
month of boats (kW) (kW) fishing/month day−1) ers day−1) (kg) W day−1)
2019/2020
2021
2023
3.5. Association between water quality parameters and 3.6. Forage/carnivore ratio of fish species
CPUE A total of five species in the primary consumer (herbivores)
A strong positive correlation was recorded for transparency with group were C. zillii, C. guineensis, O. niloticus, Sarotherodon
CPUE in 2019 and a moderate positive correlation with tempera- galilaeus, and S. melanotheron. Variation occurred in the rela-
ture in 2021. A moderate negative correlation occurred between tive abundance of the herbivores being highest in 2023
CPUE and conductivity in 2023 during the study period (Table 3). (80.61%) and least in 2021 (23.75%). Coptodon zillii was the
most abundant in this group during sampling period except in
Table 3 • Relation between the water quality parameters and cat- 2023 (O. niloticus) (Table 4). The seven (7) species that be-
ch per unit effort (CPUE) of Eleyele Lake during the study period longed to the secondary consumer (carnivores) group in this
Correlation study were Hemichromis fasciatus, Hepsetus odoe, Schilbe
Parameters 2019 2021 2023
mystus, Lates niloticus, Parachanna obscura, Polypterus
senegalus, and Gymnarchus niloticus. Temporal variation in
CPUE/temperature 0.4045 0.4859 −0.4281 the relative abundance of the carnivores follows this order
CPUE/dissolved oxygen 0.1157 0.0363 0.1226 68.04% (2021) > 35.79% (2019) > 1.49% (2023). Polypterus
senegalus dominated among the carnivore during the sampling
CPUE/pH NT 0.1648 0.1065
period. Omnivores were the least encountered with three (3)
CPUE/conductivity −0.0795 0.2453 −0.4284 species namely Clarias gariepinus, Chromidotilapia guentheri,
CPUE/total dissolved solids −0.3353 0.2516 −0.3839
and Marcusenius species. The most abundant of this group was
Marcusenius species. The F/C ratio by number was 0.70 in
CPUE/transparency 0.7969 0.2341 0.3213 2019, 0.35 in 2021, and 54 in 2023.
NT—Not taken.
Table 4 • Trophic grouping of fish species and their relative numerical abundance in Eleyele Lake during the study period
2019 2021 2023
Tropic group and fish species Number % Number % Number %
Primary consumers (Herbivores)
Omnivores
Copyright
Funding © 2024 copyright by the authors. This article is an open access
The authors declare no financial support for the research, article distributed under the terms and conditions of the
authorship, or publication of this article. Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Author contributions
Conceptualization, A.A.A.; methodology, A.A.A.; software,
References
A.A.A.; validation, A.A.A., O.M.O., O.T.P., O.R.A. and P.K.; 1. Lynch AJ, et al. Inland fish and fisheries integral to
formal analysis, A.A.A.; investigation, O.M.O., O.T.P., O.R.A. and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Sustain.
P.K.; resources, A.A.A., O.M.O., O.T.P., O.R.A. and P.K.; data 2020;3:579–87.
curation, A.A.A.; writing-original draft preparation, A.A.A.;
2. Helfman GS, Collette BB, Facey DE, Bowen BW. The diver-
writing–review and editing, A.A.A.; visualization, A.A.A.;
sity of fishes: biology, evolution, and ecology. Hoboken (NJ):
supervision, A.A.A.; project administration, A.A.A.; funding
Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
acquistition, O.M.O., O.T.P., O.R.A. and P.K. All authors have
read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. 3. FAO. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020.
Sustainability in action. Rome: FAO; 2020. p. 224.
Conflict of interest 4. FAO. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2022. Part
1: world review. Rome: FAO; 2022. doi: 10.4060/cc0461en
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
5. Lynch AJ, et al. The social, economic, and environmental
importance of inland fish and fisheries. Environ Rev.
Data availability statement 2016;24(2):115–21. doi: 10.1139/er-2015-0064
Data supporting these findings are available within the article, at 6. FAO. FishStatJ, a tool for fishery statistics analysis. Release:
https://doi.org/10.20935/AcadBiol6164, or upon request. 4.02.04. Universal Software for Fishery Statistical Time
Series. Global aquaculture production: quantity 1950–2020;
Value 1950–2020; Global capture production. Global fish
Institutional review board statement processed production statistics: Quantity 1976-2020; Rome,
Italy: FAO; 2022. p. 1950–2020.
Not applicable.
7. Charvet S, Kosmala A, Statzner B. Biomonitoring through
biological traits of benthic macroinvertebrates: perspectives
Informed consent statement for a general tool in stream management. Arch Hydrobiol.
Not applicable. 1998;142(4):415–432.
10. Subasinghe R, et al. Nigeria fish futures: report of the 27. Holden M, Reed W. West African freshwater fish. London:
scoping study. Penang: WorldFish; 2021. Longman Group Ltd.; 1972.
11. Ita EO. Inland fishery resources of Nigeria. CIFA occasional 28. Ipinmoroti MO. Ichthyofauna diversity of Lake Asejire: eco-
paper no. 20. Rome: FAO; 1993. p. 120. logical implications. Int J Fish Aquac. 2013;5(10):248–52.
12. Byrd KA, et al. The role of small-scale fisheries in Nigeria’s 29. Boyd CE. Water quality for pond aquaculture. Research and
food system. Penang: WorldFish; 2022. Development Series No. 43 International Center for Aqua-
culture and Aquatic Environments, Alabama. Alabama: Ag-
13. Mfon P, et al. Challenges of deforestation in Nigeria and the
ricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University Publisher;
millennium development goals. Int J Environ Bioenerg.
1998. p. 183.
2014;9(2):76–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2006.04.026
30. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. Annual
14. Skalski JR, Ryding KE, Millspaugh JJ. Analysis of
summary report of Michigan’s Cooperative Lakes Monitoring
population indices. In: Skalski JR, Ryding KE, Millspaugh
Program, Report No. MI/DEQ/WB-09/005. 2008.
JJ, editors. Wildlife demography: analysis of sex, age, and
count data. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press; 2005. p. 359– 31. Dong L, et al. Observations of water ransparency in China’s
433. doi: 10.1016/b978-012088773-6/50009-2 lake from space. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2020;92:
102187.
15. Belhabib D, Greer K, Pauly D. Trends in industrial and
artisanal catch per effort in West African fisheries. Conserv 32. Ayoade AA, Osuala BO, Adedapo TA. Physico-chemical
Lett. 2018;11:e12360. doi: 10.1111/ conl.12360 parameters, chlorophyll a and phytoplankton community as
trophic state indices of two tropical lakes, southwestern
16. Stamatopoulos C. Sample-based fishery surveys: a technical
Nigeria. EurAsian J BioSci. 2019;13:1–8.
handbook. FAO fisheries technical paper 425. Rome: FAO;
2022. p. 132. 33. Ayoade AA, Adeyemi HA. Composition, distribution, and
diversity of macrophytes and benthic macroinvertebrate com-
17. Olanrewaju AN, Ajani EK, Kareem OK. Physico-chemical
munities in Eleyele Lake, southwestern Nigeria. Biologija.
status of Eleyele reservoir, Ibadan, Nigeria. J Aquac Res Dev.
2022;68(4):200–11.
2017;8(9):512. doi: 10.4172/2155-9546.1000512
34. Olaniran TS. Fishing activities and fish species diversity
18. Ayoade AA, Nierziwicki-Bauer SA. Preliminary assessments
assessment in Eleyele Lake, Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr J Livest Ext.
of composition and diversity of bacterioplankton in two
2003;2:72–74.
tropical man-made lakes, southwestern Nigeria. J Biol Med
Open Access. 2020;1(2):114–9. 35. Adaka GS, Nlewadim AA, Udoh JP. Diversity and
distribution of freshwater fishes in Oguta lake, southeast
19. Adeleru RA. Nigeria - Ibadan Urban Flood Management
Nigeria. Adv Life Sci Technol. 2016;46:25–32.
Project0: environmental assessment: Environmental and
Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) for emergency rehabilita- 36. Sani BM, Idowu RT, Banyigyi AH. The diversity of fish
tion of Eleyele Dam, Oyo State (English). Washington (DC): species, composition and abundance from Bodna River in
World Bank Group; 2017. Available from: http://docu- Kwali Area Council, Abuja. Niger Ann Pure Appl Sci. 2019;
ments.worldbank.org/curated/en/566181485759738747/E 2:41–7.
nvironmental-and-SocialImpactAssessment-ESIA-for-
37. Abiodun JA, Miller JW. Assessment of Gerio Lake fishery for
emergency-rehabilitation-of-Eleyele- Dam-Oyo-State
enhanced management and improved fish production. J
20. Olaosebikan BD, Raji A. Field guide to Nigerian freshwater Appl Sci Environ Manag. 2007;11(4):11–4.
fishes. New Bussa: Federal College of Freshwater Fisheries
38. Olopade OA, Rufai OP. Composition, abundance and
Technology; 1998. p. 106.
diversity of the Family Cichlidae in Oyan Dam, Ogun State,
21. Idodo- Umeh G. Freshwater fishes of Nigeria: taxonomy, Nigeria. Biodiversitas. 2014;15:195–9.
ecological notes, diet and utilization. Benin-City: IdodoU-
39. Ipinmoroti MO, Iyiola AO. Diversity, distribution and
meh Publ., 2003; p. 232.
abundance of fish species in Lake Asejire, Oyo State, Nigeria.
22. Zeller D, et al. Still catching attention: Sea Around Us Zoologist. 2023;21:49–56. doi: 10.4314/tzool.v21i1.8
reconstructed global catch data, their spatial expression and
40. Babiker MM. Development of dependence on aerial
public accessibility. Mar Policy. 2016;70:145–52.
respiration in Polypterus senegalus (Cuvier). Hydrobiol.
23. Greer K, et al. Global trends in carbon dioxide (CO2) 1984;110:351–63. doi: 10.1007/BF00025808
emissions from fuel combustion in marine fisheries from
41. Mbanga B, van Dyk C, Maina JN. Morphometric and
1950-2016. Mar Policy. 2019;107:103382. doi: 10.1016/
morphological study of the respiratory organs of the
j.marpol.2018.12.001
bimodally-breathing African sharptooth catfish (Clarias
24. Shannon CE, Weiner W. The mathematical theory of commu- gariepinus): Burchell (1822). Zoology (Jena). 2018;130:6–
nication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1949. p. 125. 18. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
PMID: 30502840.
25. Pielou EC. The measurement of diversity in different types
of biological collections. J Theor Biol. 1966;13:131–44. 42. Gupta C, Langer S, Dhar M. Variations in water quality
parameters and their correlation with fish catch per unit
26. Margalef DI. Diversidad de species en las comunidales
effort of Bhini Stream, a tributary of River Ravi, Jammu and
naturals. Publ Inst Biol Appl. 1949;9:5–27.
Kashmir, India. Ecol Environ Conserv. 2022;28(4): 45. Utete B, Fregene BT. Heavy metal concentrations in surface
1967–75. water, sediments and fish and their potential toxicity in
highly degraded multipurpose peri-urban Eleyele Lake,
43. Offem BO, Ayotunde EO, Ikpi GU, Ochang SN, Ada FB.
Ibadan City, Oyo State, southwestern, Nigeria. Cogent
“Influence of seasons on water quality, abundance of fish
Environ Sci. 2020;6:1–22.
and plankton species of Ikwori lake, south eastern Nigeria.
Fish Aquac J. 2011;13:1–18. 46. Swingle HS. Relationships and dynamics of balanced and
imbalanced fish populations. Alabama: Agricultural Experi-
44. Solomon SG, Ayuba VO, Tahir MA, Okomoda VT. Catch per
ment Station; 1950. p. 274.
unit effort and some water quality parameters of Lake
Kalgwai Jigawa state, Nigeria. Food Sci Nutr. 2018;6:450– 47. Hamilton LC, Brown BC, Rasmussen RO. West Greenland’s
6. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.57 cod-to-shrimp transition: local dimensions of climatic
change. Arctic. 2003;56:271–82.