A Written Report in Tejeros Convention

Rph.

dani

Which between the two is primary, and which is secondary?

- Santiago Alvarez wrote the account himself to document the events. The noteworthy
about here that made his memoirs a primary source is: he was a captain-general of
the magdiwag forces of the provincial council of the Katipunan in Cavite and was
one of those who led The revolution from August 1896 - August 1901. Even before he
was hailed as the commander of the Magdiwang army, he was in fact active in the
Katipunan as a member and delegate and was often in the company of Andres
Bonifacio. His memoirs and narrations of these events became primary sources
because he was not only an eyewitness to the incidents, but also an active
firsthand participant in them.
- The Seeds of Discontent by Teodoro Agoncillo was a secondary source because he

wasn’t an eyewitness himself.
What kind of document is this? when was this created?

- A diary. Santiago Alvarez wrote the account himself to document the events of the
Tejeros convention. He documented it, which took place during the Philippine
Revolutionary on Spanish colonial rule, in 1898. Santiago documented the entries
shortly after the convention that took place on 25th of March 1897.
- A journal. Teodoro Agoncillo argues that “these” seeds planted discontent among
peoples’ population, sparking of desire for independence from the Spaniard's
colonization in 1896. The elements that have presented in this discontent are
Filipino's social status, economic social status, and Filipinos’ grievances, etc.
he was published the book in 1947.
research something about the author of the document ( research at least 3 things)
Teodoro Andal Agoncillo

- he was a prominent 20th-century Filipino historian.
- he was a writer and a poet
- he was once a group member promoting a nationalist view of Filipino history.
Santiago Virata Alvarez

- he was nicknamed "Kidlatang Apoy" or "General Apoy"
- he was a military general, and founder of the Partido Nacionalista party.
- the party that he founded existed from 1901 to 1907, was known as "Kidlat ng
Apoy"
why did the author created this document? what was the goal?
Santiago Alvarez
* Santiago's objective was to write a book dedicated to young people, and for
future generations; to show a different perspective about the Philippines'
revolution that could be used as a historical account in the future.
Teodoro Agoncillo
*Teodoro aimed to create a more comprehensive and accurate understanding of the
Philippines' revolution. his objective was to bridge the gap between the past and
the present.
what possible bias does the author manifest in this document, and what insights do
these historical documents convey?
Santiago Alvarez
Santiago's favor could be from the influence of his mantle as a firsthand partaker.
he might show the incidents to his liking due to his premeditated in life. but as
for me, I don't think he was biased because he made a blow-by-blow account, wherein
the details.. most of it not all, were taken into account; except that fact that he
was a magdiwang commander, and also Emilio's longtime friend, and brother in law.
As he wrote his memoir, he stated: "I will attempt down what I saw and what i know
about the Katipunan, and the Revolution", it is a subtle way of assuring to his
readers (to us) of the truthfulness of his account (his truthfulness).
Teodoro Agoncillo
Teodoro might favor could be from the influence of his viewpoint as a historian
Filipinos'. he might show the factors and sentiments, that could have led to focus
on the Philippines' struggle for independence and freedom.
After reading the documents, what insights do these historical documents convey?
here's my three cents
The Tejeros Convention is a pivotal incident in our history. it was marked as a

turning point, struggling for independence, and solidifying Emilio's leadership.
their documents let out internal conflicts in Filipinos' government management,

with human rights violations.
As a reader, I was able to imagine the event and comprehend the author's experience
which he described in better detail, including their inner dialogue, their actions,
and depiction of character's feelings, as if I'm reading a Wattpad story ems.
why are the documents important? what is the contribution of the documents helping
us understand the grand narrative of Philippine History?
because it provides us with a unique perspective on the Philippine Revolution that

could reflect their viewpoint (both authors) onto us.

A Written Report in Tejeros Convention

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Written Report in Tejeros Convention

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Written Report in Tejeros Convention

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rph.

Which between the two is primary, and which is secondary?

- The Seeds of Discontent by Teodoro Agoncillo was a secondary source because he

What kind of document is this? when was this created?

Teodoro Andal Agoncillo

Santiago Virata Alvarez

here's my three cents

The Tejeros Convention is a pivotal incident in our history. it was marked as a

their documents let out internal conflicts in Filipinos' government management,

because it provides us with a unique perspective on the Philippine Revolution that

You might also like