Ethics and Religion in "Abou Ben Adhem"
Ethics and Religion in "Abou Ben Adhem"
Course Mapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TOPICS PAGE TIME ALLOTMENT
(MINUTES)
The Religious Response: The Role of 1 64.8
Religion in Ethics
Assignment 12 60
Formative Assessment 12 60
Plagiarism is the use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author
and the representation of them as one’s original work. (1995 Random House Compact
Unabridged Dictionary)
In the academe, it is an adaption or reproduction of an original intellectual creation, be
it concepts, ideas, methods, pieces of information or expressions of another author, whether
individual, group, or organization without proper acknowledgment. Moreover, plagiarism can
range from borrowing a particular phrase or sentence to paraphrasing someone else’s original
idea without citing it. The most common form of plagiarism, especially nowadays, is copying
and pasting online material without crediting the source.
1. I shall not submit other people’s work and present them as my own.
2. I will not take any passages from their own previous work without adding
citations.
3. I will not rewrite someone else’s work without properly citing sources.
4. I shall not use quotations without citing the source.
5. I will not interweave various sources together in my work, without citing.
6. I will not rely too heavily on other people’s work.
7. I shall bring original thought into my own work.
8. I will not disclose any exams/questionnaires/activities after I have taken them.
9. I will not copy any material from another student and submit it as my own.
10. I shall not share my own completed output to another class/student.
__________________________
(Signature over Printed Name)
REFERENCE:
https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-collegesuccess-lumen1/chapter/academic-honesty/
GEC 2108 Page iv
ETHICS
Republic of the Philippines
PHILIPPINE STATE COLLEGE OF AERONAUTICS
INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
Basa Air Base Campus, Floridablanca, Pampanga
https://www.business.umt.edu/et
Ethics is concerned with what is good and moral based on reason. This is what religion is also
concerned about, what is moral based on God's revelation. So religion is not contrary to
ethics. Religion is in support of ethics.
To an Asian author Sim Kwang Yang, the question is, "Is ethics possible without religion?. If
the question is one on a matter of fact, his answer is a resounding "yes." According to him,
two great philosophers, mely Socrates and Confucius "expounded their ethics without
recourse ny supernatural being." Likewise, Yang cites two modem period philosophers, the
utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, who also dealt with their ethical
theories without appealing to the existence of God.
Thus, as a matter of fact, there can be, as there has been such a thing which may be termed
as "religionless" ethics or morality
However, the same author clarifies that if the question is, "can ethics without religion be
justified, ultimately?" then the answer is no. It is good to quote Dostoevsky again, "If God
does not exist, then everything is permissible." If we continue with the syllogism it will go as
follows: "But not everything is permitted. Therefore, God exists." There is moral restraint
among individuals and there is moral restraint among people in society, because there is in
them a voice telling them to behave.
Charles Taliaferro, echoes in his Philosophy of Religion Dostoevsky's moral argument for
theism:
of a loving God, and moral values in general may be thought to reflect God's nature.[3]
(emphasis in bold letters supplied)
It may be said that this life of "not permitting oneself to do anything", that is living a moral
or ethical life, is attributed not only to him/her who openly professes his/her faith in God.
It can also be attributed even to those who claim to deny the existence of God but actually
affirm Him in their actual life. A person's life can be an implicit affirmation of God. You may
be reminded of a poem you came across in your literature classes entitled Abou Ben Adhem
By Leigh Hunt
Hence, one should not feel so much sorry for people whom we think live a religionless or
atheistic life. The ultimate assessment of one's life should be based on what one does, his/her
love for his/her fellowman. The poem's message is actually found in the Gospel where Jesus
said, "whatsoever you do to the least of my bretheren, that you do unto me."
A longstanding debate has been whether ethics plays a role in religion. Most religions have
an ethical component. Ethics, which is a major branch of philosophy, encompasses right
conduct and good life. It is significantly broader than the common conception of analyzing
right and wrong. Ethics deals with ideas such as Right, Good and Duty and these concepts
were discussed in ancient Greece by Plato and Aristotle in the 3rd & 4th Century BCE.
A central aspect of ethics is "the good life", the life worth living or life that is simply
satisfying, which is held by many philosophers to be more important than traditional moral
codes. The ancient Greeks called it eudaimonia or happiness. The ancient Greeks believed
happiness was brought about by living one’s life in accordance with virtue – positive traits of
character. Virtue in the highest sense, in an adult who has been brought up well, will not just
involve good personal habits such as courage and temperance, but also friendship and
justice and intellectual virtue. The essence of virtue is in the wholeness of the person
brought about by integrity.
The influential philosopher, Immanuel Kant defended the idea of God as a basic requirement
of ethics. We ought to be virtuous and do our duty, he said. Kant believed virtue should be
rewarded by happiness, and it would be intolerable if it were not so. Since it's clear that
virtue often does go unrewarded in the present life, Kant argued that the soul must be
immortal. Virtue must receive its due recompense in a future life, and there must be a God
guaranteeing that it is so rewarded. The existence of God and the immortality of the soul
were what Kant called the postulates of practical reason - the assumptions without which, so
he claimed, ethics and a moral life would not be possible.
Revealed religions like Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam do prescribe some
clear and unambiguous rules to follow. If their scriptures were authored or dictated by God,
then the commands in them are God's own commands. They cannot be changed if human
circumstances change or ethical ideas progress.
If religion has a role in moral decision-making, then what should be that role? In America, for
many individuals, their religion is a centrally defining characteristic of who they are, such
that they would be nearly incapable of making ethical decisions independently of their
religious beliefs.
Further, some of our most basic moral sentiments are directly connected to religious
ideology. For example, most people agree that things like murder and adultery are always
wrong, regardless of circumstances. Most major world religions echo these sentiments, and
it can be argued that the ancient codes of conduct these traditions embody are actually the
original source of our social intuitions. At a minimum, we do seem to regard religion as a
good source of basic moral guidance, making it unwise to argue that there ought to be no
connection between religion and ethics.
The link between religion and morality is best illustrated by the Golden Rule. Virtually all of
the world’s great religions contain in their religious texts some version of the Golden Rule:
“Do unto others as you would wish them do unto you”. In other words, we should treat
others the way we would want to be treated. This is the basic ethic that guides all religions.
If we do so, happiness will ensue.
I’ve studied other religions and identified the following religious tenets that speak to the
Golden Rule:
(Source:https://www.ethicssage.com/2012/09/the-role-of-ethics-in-religion.html)
Both ethics and religion are concerned with the most fundamental questions of human
existence. Religion draws answers to what is moral and ethical from revelation as written in
Scriptures and as "lived by their prophets and Jesus Christ (for Christians). Ethics gets its
answers to what is moral and ethical from reason and experience. It doesn't mean that
theists don't use reason when they determine what is right and In fact, even those for whom
morality is religiously based may want to examine their views based on reason. They may
want to examine various interpretations of their religious principles for internal consistency
or coherence." (MacKinnon, B., et al, 2015)
It is not true that ethics is atheistic or opposed to religious belief. The role of religion in
ethics is this: religion is the foundation of ethics, for theists. Religion makes clear and
concrete what is ethical through revelation. Theists draw their ethical views from their
religion.
Religious ethics concerns teachings and practices of what is right or wrong, good or bad,
virtuous or vicious, from a religious point of view. The definition of “religion” is controversial.
A definition favored by the Supreme Court is that religions are traditions that are anything
like Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, or Buddhism.
A more detailed definition to consider is: A religion is a tradition and practice based on a
conception of what is real and significant (God, Allah, the Tao, Brahman, etc.), and the belief
that sin, vice, disillusionment, and illusion may be overcome by grace, meditation, practices,
and living in harmony, unity, or wise concord with what is real and significant. A Christian
ethic, for example, may be informed by Jesus’ radical teaching about loving one’s neighbor,
being a good Samaritan, loving one’s enemies, and the like.
The majority of the world’s population consists of self-identified members of some religion.
While the U.S. Supreme Court ruled out compulsory prayer, in the same ruling it states: “It
might well be said that one’s education is not complete without a study of comparative
religion or the history of religion and its relationship to the advancement of civilization.” To
not study world religions is to not inquire into a vital part of human history and life today.
Here in the U.S., our population is woefully ignorant of world religions. A recent poll showed
that only 38% of adult Americans know that Vishnu and Shiva are gods or divine beings in
Hinduism. The majority do not know the Five Pillars of Islam or the Four Noble Truths of
Buddhism, and only 50% of adult Americans can name one of the four gospels in the New
Testament. If you are thinking of engaging in international relations or working in a
pluralistic religious culture (medicine, law, business of any kind, politics, governance,
architecture, the arts, and more), a working knowledge of world religions is essential.
There is no evidence that the tendency to self-identify with a religious identity is declining
among world populations. Islam continues to grow, and while Christianity has atrophied in
some European countries, worldwide it continues to grow, remaining the largest religious
population in the world. Roughly 40% of Africans are Christian, and 40% are Islamic. About
half the world’s population is made up of self-identified Christians and Muslims, and there
are roughly a billion Hindus.
A possible religious foundation for ethics is important to explore, as it is not obvious that
secular naturalism can provide a fully satisfactory foundation for ethics.
The study of religious ethics is also recommended given the great importance of
interfaithdialogue, which pervades our political system, not to mention everyday human
interaction. See the work of Professor Anant Rambachan for more about the exchange
between different religions:
Some theists and atheists believe that if there is no God (and they usually think of the Judeo-
Christian idea of God), then right and wrong, good and evil are entirely subjective, or
relative. In Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov, the Devil’s voice says to Ivan that, without
God, “everything is permitted” (Dostoevsky 1990: 643). Philosophers like J.L. Mackie,
Michael Ruse, Bertrand Russell, and Jean-Paul Sartre seem to agree. Nietzsche claims that if
there is no God, “there are no moral facts.”
(Source: https://pages.stolaf.edu/ein/disciplines/religious-ethics/)
Religion is a cultural universal because it fulfills several basic functions within human societies. It is a
basic requirement of group life. In sociological terms, these include both manifest and latent
functions. Among the manifest (open and stated) functions of religion are included defining the
spiritual world and giving meaning to the divine.
Religion provides an explanation for events that seem difficult to understand. By contrast, latent
functions or religion are unintended, covert, or hidden. Functionalists suggest that religion is a
requirement for society and individual both because it serves both manifest and latent functions
Friedrich Engels, a life-long close associate of Karl Marx, once noted that religion could make
the masses ‘submissive to the behests of the masters it had pleased God to place over
them’. Durkheim also emphasized that besides acting as an integrating force, religion also
reinforces social control in oppressive society.
Religious beliefs can influence the conduct of those who believe in them. It keeps people ‘in
line’ through folkways and mores. It provides a foundation for mores of society. Religious
sanctions are sought for certain desirable patterns of behaviour to persist in society in the
forms of mores. Thus, many taboos in various cultures have religious sanctions, e.g., the
taboo against eating of pork in Jewish and Muslims and cows meat in Hindus.
It provides a means whereby man can face the crises and vicissitudes of life with strength
and fortitude. The concepts of karma and transmigration among Hindus and Jesus Christ as
son of God and prayer among Christians seek to provide such fortitude and strength.
Thomas O’Dea (1970) writes, ‘Men need emotional support in the face of uncertainty,
consolation when confronted with disappointments and anxiety.’ It is often said that visiting
places of worship and holy premises serves as outlets for releasing tension and stress.
Religion offers consolation to oppressed peoples also by giving them hope that they can
achieve salvation and eternal happiness in the afterlife. Religion increases the ‘God will
provide’ the attitude.
These beliefs are based on the faith that life has a purpose, and there is someone or
something that controls the universe. It defines the spiritual world and gives meaning to the
divine. Because of its beliefs concerning people’s relationships to a beyond, religion provides
an explanation for events that seem difficult to understand.
For example, India’s traditional caste system defined the social structure of society.
According to one theory, caste system is a creation of the priesthood (Brahmins)—the
uppermost stratum of this system, but it also served the interests of political rulers by
granting legitimacy to social inequality.
Marx has acknowledged that religion plays an important role in legitimating the existing
social structure. The values of religion reinforce other social institutions and the social order
as a whole and as a consequence it perpetuates social inequality in society.
9. Psychologizing Religion:
The notion of ‘positive thinking’ serves as an example of psychologizing religion. It provides
peace of mind, promises prosperity and success in life, as well as effective and happy human
relations. It is thus a source of security and confidence, and also of happiness and success in
this world.
But at times religion can be debilitating and personally destructive. Persons convinced of
their own essential wickedness can suffer extreme personal difficulties. As Kingsley Davis
(1949) noted, ‘Like other medicines, it (religion) can sometimes make worse the very thing it
seeks to remedy.
Innumerable are the psychoses and neuroses that have religious content’. But, in this role,
religion is not always harmful. Many times, it serves as a liberating and integrating force for
individuals. For instance, it helps in bringing change (sobriety) to seemingly hopeless
alcoholics.
A new vocation of religious practitioner has recently come up in the mental health field as a
helping professional. It already existed in village India and other places in the form of
shamans, priests and magicians (shamans are treated as super-humans endowed with
supernatural powers in some tribal societies).
Mahatma Gandhi, Jesus, Thomas More all died upholding spiritual beliefs that were not
those of the social order in which they lived. Religion, in its prophetic function, provides
individuals with an unshakable foundation of social criticism which later on becomes the
basis for social change. Many religious groups of the world protested against Vietnam and
Iraq wars and an age-old Buddha statue in Afghanistan.
Generally, religion is regarded as an impediment in the path of social change but many
religious groups, by criticizing existing rules of social morality and social injustice, and
community or government actions, help in bringing about social change. In this regard, Max
Weber’s pioneering work on the relationship between economy and the religion.
The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1930) can be cited that how Protestant
ethic had helped in the development of spirit of capitalism in certain European nations.
Weber’s major theoretical point to be noted here is that ideas can change history, and in so
doing can contribute to changes in the material context of life.
Despite establishing relationship between religious ethic and economy, Weber argued that
the effects of religion on society are unpredictable and varied. Sometimes it might have
conservative effect, whereas in other cases it might contribute to social change. Thus,
Buddhism militated against the development of capitalism in China, whereas in Northern
Europe, Calvinism had the opposite effect.
Contrary to Weber, Marx has put forth a quite opposite thesis. He opined that religion
impedes social change by encouraging oppressed people to focus on other worldly concerns
rather than on their immediate poverty or exploitation. He said, ‘Religion is the sigh of the
oppressed creature, the feelings of heartless world …. It is the opiate of the people.’
Whereas Marx had seen religion as a consequence of the economy, Weber believed that
religion helped to shape a new economic system.
It should be noted that many religious leaders have acted in the forefront of many social and
political movements. For example, Martin Luther King fought for civil rights of Blacks in
America. Swami Dayanand worked aggressively for women education and widow remarriage
in India.
In the end, it may be said that in spite of being regarded as superstition, religion is persisting
for such a long time as a social institution because of its varied functions cited above that it
performs for the welfare of the individual and the society both.
At many times, even the so-called educated people regard religious laws as superior to the
man-made laws. In primitive and traditional societies and even some sections of modern
societies, despite all-round attack over it, religion is a pervasive matter, and religious beliefs
and rites play an important part in the activities of various kinds of groups—from family to
occupational groups. Though inhabitants and citizens of a ‘modern’ society, many remain
traditional in their religious and moral outlook. For some, this means that religious authority
and principles override that of secular law.
(Source: https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/sociology/religious-institutions/religion-3-
most-important-functions-of-religion/31380)
Key Points
Ethics is concerned with what is good and moral based on reason. This is what religion is also
concerned about, what is moral based on God's revelation. So religion is not contrary to ethics.
Religion is in support of ethics.
To an Asian author Sim Kwang Yang, the question is, "Is ethics possible without religion?. If the
question is one on a matter of fact, his answer is a resounding "yes." According to him, two great
philosophers, mely Socrates and Confucius "expounded their ethics without recourse ny supernatural
being." Likewise, Yang cites two modem period philosophers, the utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham and
John Stuart Mill, who also dealt with their ethical theories without appealing to the existence of God.
A longstanding debate has been whether ethics plays a role in religion. Most religions have an ethical
component. Ethics, which is a major branch of philosophy, encompasses right conduct and good life. It
is significantly broader than the common conception of analyzing right and wrong. Ethics deals with
ideas such as Right, Good and Duty and these concepts were discussed in ancient Greece by Plato and
Aristotle in the 3rd & 4th Century BCE.
A central aspect of ethics is "the good life", the life worth living or life that is simply satisfying, which is
held by many philosophers to be more important than traditional moral codes. The ancient Greeks
called it eudaimonia or happiness. The ancient Greeks believed happiness was brought about by living
one’s life in accordance with virtue – positive traits of character. Virtue in the highest sense, in an adult
who has been brought up well, will not just involve good personal habits such as courage and
temperance, but also friendship and justice and intellectual virtue. The essence of virtue is in the
wholeness of the person brought about by integrity.
Both ethics and religion are concerned with the most fundamental questions of human existence.
Religion draws answers to what is moral and ethical from revelation as written in Scriptures and as
"lived by their prophets and Jesus Christ (for Christians). Ethics gets its answers to what is moral and
ethical from reason and experience. It doesn't mean that theists don't use reason when they
determine what is right and In fact, even those for whom morality is religiously based may want to
examine their views based on reason. They may want to examine various interpretations of their
religious principles for internal consistency or coherence." (MacKinnon, B., et al, 2015)
Some of the most important functions of religion are as follows:
Religion is a cultural universal because it fulfills several basic functions within human societies. It is a
basic requirement of group life. In sociological terms, these include both manifest and latent functions.
Among the manifest (open and stated) functions of religion are included defining the spiritual world
and giving meaning to the divine.
1. Religion as an Integrative Force:
Durkheim believed that the primary function of religion was to preserve and solidify society. It
functions to reinforce the collective unity or social solidarity of a group. Sharing the same religion or
religious interpretation of the meaning of life unites people in a cohesive and building moral order.
2. Creating a Moral Community:
Religion provides a system of beliefs around which people may gather to belong to something greater
than themselves in order to have their personal beliefs reinforced by the group and its rituals. Those
who share a common ideology develop a collective identity and a sense of fellowship.
3. Religion as Social Control:
Frank E. Manuel (1959) had said that ‘religion was a mechanism which inspired terror, but terror for
the preservation of society’. While conservatives have valued religion for its protective function,
radicals have also often recognized that religion can be a support of the established order, and have,
consequently, been critical of religion.
4. Provides Rites of Passage:
Religion helps us in performing ceremonies and rituals related to rites of passage (birth, marriage,
death and other momentous events) which give meaning and a social significance to our life.
9. Psychologizing Religion:
The notion of ‘positive thinking’ serves as an example of psychologizing religion. It provides peace of
mind, promises prosperity and success in life, as well as effective and happy human relations. It is thus
a source of security and confidence, and also of happiness and success in this world.
REFLECTION
Does your faith in God strengthen you to be moral and ethical? Reflect on instances when
these happened.
SUMMARY
Ethics determines what is good and bad, moral and immoral through thelight of reason.
Religion determines what is moral and immoral based on revelation. It is not true that theists don't use
reason when they determine what is right and wrong. In fact, theists may want to examine their views
of revelation based on reason.
Religion is in support of ethics not contrary to ethics
Most religions have an ethical component. Ethics,
A central aspect of ethics is "the good life", the life worth living or life that is simply satisfying, which is
held by many philosophers to be more important than traditional moral codes.
The ancient Greeks called it eudaimonia or happiness. The ancient Greeks believed happiness was
brought about by living one’s life in accordance with virtue – positive traits of character.
Both ethics and religion are concerned with the most fundamental questions of human existence.
Religion draws answers to what is moral and ethical from revelation as written in Scriptures and as
"lived by their prophets and Jesus Christ (for Christians). Ethics gets its answers to what is moral and
ethical from reason and experience.
Religion is a cultural universal because it fulfills several basic functions within human societies. It is a
basic requirement of group life.
Religion provides an explanation for events that seem difficult to understand. By contrast, latent
functions or religion are unintended, covert, or hidden.
Some of the most important functions of religion are as follows:
1. Religion as an Integrative Force 2. Creating a Moral Community 3. Religion as Social Control 4.
Provides Rites of Passage 5. Religion as Emotional Support 6. Religion Serves a Means to Provide
Answers to Ultimate Questions 7. Religion as a Source of Identity 8. Legitimating Function of Religion 9.
Psychologizing Religion 10. Religion Acts as Psychotherapy 11. Religion as an Agent of Social Change 12.
Religion as an Agent of De-politicization 13. Religion Controls Sexuality.
References:
https://www.khanacademy.org/test-prep/mcat/
society-and-culture/culture/a/cultural-relativism-
article
(Source:http://cms.gcg11.ac.in/attachments/article/
182/Nature%20of%20Ethics.pdf)
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/
10.1080/0951508021000042030
https://www.slideshare.net/smagg01/ethical-
theories-46047004