Solar Farm Guide Nov 2022

Rushcliffe Borough Council

Solar Farm Development

Planning Guidance
November 2022
Contents

1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1
2. Purpose and scope of Guide........................................................................... 1
3. Planning Policy Context .................................................................................. 2
Local Planning Policy ......................................................................................... 2
National Planning Policy & Guidance ................................................................. 3
4. Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) .................................................... 5
5. Community Engagement ................................................................................. 6
6. Key Material Planning Considerations ........................................................... 6
Compliance with Green Belt policy (where relevant) .......................................... 6
Landscape & Visual Impacts .............................................................................. 7
Ecology & Biodiversity ........................................................................................ 8
Best Most Versatile Agricultural Land (BMV) ................................................... 11
Historic Environment ........................................................................................ 12
Open Space, Green Infrastructure Network & Other Recreational Uses .......... 13
Site and Internal Access .................................................................................. 14
Grid Connection & Potential Generating Profile ............................................... 15
Form and Siting ................................................................................................ 15
Decommissioning and Restoration................................................................... 16
Cumulative Impacts.......................................................................................... 17
Amenity, Pollution, Glint and Glare & Safety .................................................... 18
Flood Risk & Drainage ..................................................................................... 19
Minerals Safeguarding ..................................................................................... 19
Site Security (fencing and CCTV) .................................................................... 20
7. Planning Obligations ..................................................................................... 20
8. Appendices ..................................................................................................... 21
1
1. Introduction
1.1 In 2019, the Government set a legally binding target to bring carbon emissions
in the UK to net zero. It considers that a fourfold increase in the use of ‘clean
electricity generation’ from renewable technologies such as solar photovoltaics
will be essential to underpin the delivery of the net zero target (Energy White
Paper, December 2020).
1.2 Renewables now account for over one third of UK electricity generation (up
from seven per cent in 2010), as a result of the increased deployment of wind,
solar and biomass technologies. Electricity demand is predicted to double in
the UK by 2050, driven in part by the electrification of vehicles and the
increased use of clean electricity replacing natural gas for heating. As a result,
electricity could provide more than half of the final energy demand in 2050, up
from 17% in 2019.
1.3 The Government has committed to closing all coal fired power stations no later
than 2025 and expects future low-cost, net zero consistent electricity to be
made up of predominantly onshore and offshore wind and solar,
complemented by technologies which provide power, or reduce demand,
when the wind is not blowing, or the sun does not shine, including nuclear,
clean hydrogen and long-duration storage (Energy White Paper, December
2020).
1.4 In its recent British Energy Security Strategy, the Government has indicated
that it will consult on amending planning rules to strengthen policy in favour of
ground mounted solar developments on non-protected land, but will ensure
communities continue to have a say and environmental protections remain in
place.
1.5 Over the last ten years the Council has granted planning permission for a
small number of modest sized solar farms across the Borough. Generally,
these developments have had site areas below 25 hectares and generating
capacities not exceeding 12.4MW. More recently the Council has started to
receive a number of planning applications and applications for Environmental
Impact Assessment screening opinions for much larger, ‘utility’ scale solar
farms with site areas up to 80 hectares and generating capacities of up to
49.9MW.
2. Purpose and scope of Guide
2.1 This document is intended to provide broad guidance on:

a) the planning policy context in respect of major, stand-alone ground
mounted solar photovoltaic panel developments (hereafter referred to as
‘major solar farm developments’) that do not exceed 50 megawatts (MW)
generating capacity;
1
b) the key material planning considerations likely to be relevant to the
determination of planning applications for major solar farm developments
within the Borough; and
c) examples of the information/documents that the Council expects should
be submitted with planning applications for major solar farm
developments.
2.2 The guidance does not identify any preferred sites for major solar farm
development within Rushcliffe or cover planning advice for smaller building
mounted solar energy systems.
2.3 Major solar farm developments with a generating capacity of 50MW or less
are typically determined by the Council under the normal planning regime,
whereas larger ‘utility scale solar farm developments’ (i.e.: those exceeding
50MW capacity) are considered to be Nationally Significant Infrastructure
Projects and as such are determined by the Secretary of State for Business,
Energy & Industrial Strategy, under a particular planning process known as a
Development Consent Order.
2.4 For the purposes of this guidance major solar farm developments are those
with a site area of 1 hectare or more, as defined in the Town and Country
Planning (Development Management Procedure) England Order 2015 and a
generating capacity not exceeding 50MW.
3. Planning Policy Context
3.1 By law, all planning applications must be determined in accordance with the
development plan, unless there are material considerations that indicate
otherwise. This document builds upon and provides more detailed guidance
on relevant policies in the development plan.
Local Planning Policy
3.2 The development plan relevant to solar farm development covering Rushcliffe
Borough consists of the following:
 The Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy 2014 (LPP1);
 The Rushcliffe Local Plan Part 2: Land and Planning Policies 2019 (LPP2);
 Nottinghamshire Mineral Local Plan, 2021; and
 Adopted Neighbourhood Plans covering an application site, or part of it.
3.3 The key strategic policy within the development plan that is relevant to major
solar farm developments is Policy 2 (Climate Change) of the LPP1. This sets
out the Council’s overarching aim that all development will, amongst other
things, be expected to mitigate against the effects of climate change and
comply with national and local targets on reducing carbon emissions. The
policy also supports the development of new decentralised, renewable and
2
low carbon energy generation, including from solar, where they are compatible
with environmental, heritage, landscape and other planning considerations.
3.4 Policy 16 (Renewable Energy) of the LPP2 sets out the policy requirements
for renewable energy developments within the Borough and confirms that
planning permission will be granted for such developments, providing they are
acceptable in terms of the 16 criteria listed in the policy.
3.5 Depending on the location of the application site, other development plan
policies of relevance to the determination of planning applications for major
solar farm developments may also include:
Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy (LPP1)

 Policy 1 (Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development)
 Policy 4 (Nottingham-Derby Green Belt)
 Policy 10 (Design and Enhancing Local Identity)
 Policy 11 (Historic Environment)
 Policy 16 (Green Infrastructure, Landscape, Parks and Open Spaces)
 Policy 17 (Biodiversity)
Local Plan Part 2: Land and Planning Policies (LPP2)

 Policy 1 (Development Requirements)
 Policy 17 (Managing Flood Risk)
 Policy 18 (Surface Water Management)
 Policy 19 (Development Affecting Watercourses)
 Policy 21 (Green Belt)
 Policy 22 (Development within the Countryside)
 Policy 28 (Conserving and Enhancing Heritage Assets)
 Policy 29 (Development affecting Archaeological Sites)
 Policy 34 (Green Infrastructure and Open Space Assets)
 Policy 36 (Designated Nature Conservation Sites)
 Policy 37 (Trees and Woodlands)
 Policy 38 (Non-Designated Biodiversity Assets and the Wider Ecological
Network)
 Policy 40 (Pollution and Land Contamination)
 Policy 42 (Safeguarding Minerals)
National Planning Policy & Guidance
3.6 The overarching National Policy Statement for Energy (NPS EN-1) and
National Policy Statement for Renewable Energy Infrastructure (NPS EN-3)
set out national policy for the delivery of nationally significant energy
infrastructure, including renewable energy, although currently neither explicitly
covers large scale solar electricity generation or battery storage.
3
3.7 Paragraph 5 of the National Planning Policy Framework July 2021 (NPPF),
states that NPS’s are part of the overall framework of national planning policy
and as such may also be a material consideration in making decisions on
planning applications. The NPS’s set out assessment principles for judging
impacts of energy projects and are material considerations when considering
development proposals.
3.8 With particular regard to applications for major solar farm developments that
are close to the 50MW capacity threshold, both NPS EN-1 and NPS EN-3 are
likely to be material considerations. The National Policy Statement for
Electricity Networks Infrastructure (NPS EN-5) may also be relevant where
new overhead electricity lines and associated infrastructure are proposed to
connect the solar farm to the grid.
3.9 The NPPF is also a material consideration, in particular where the

development plan is silent on a matter or the policies within the development
plan expressly defer to the NPPF (for example Policy 21 of the LPP2). The
NPPF talks generally about renewable energy generation within the context of
planning for climate change but makes no specific reference to solar farm
developments. Notwithstanding this the NPPF favours sustainable energy
systems as long as any impacts are (or can be) made acceptable. It advises
that local planning authorities should promote these as part of a positive
strategy for tackling climate change. Paragraph 158 states that local planning
authorities should not require the overall need for renewable energy to be
demonstrated and approve planning applications for renewable energy
developments if its impacts are (or can be made) acceptable.
3.10 The Government’s online Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) provides

guidance on the specific planning considerations that relate to large scale
ground-mounted solar PV farms. At paragraph 013 it states:
“The deployment of large-scale solar farms can have a negative impact on

the rural environment, particularly in undulating landscapes. However, the
visual impact of a well-planned and well-screened solar farm can be properly
addressed within the landscape if planned sensitively.
Particular factors a local planning authority will need to consider include:
 encouraging the effective use of land by focussing large scale solar farms
on previously developed and non-agricultural land, provided that it is not
of high environmental value;
 where a proposal involves greenfield land, whether (i) the proposed use
of any agricultural land has been shown to be necessary and poorer
quality land has been used in preference to higher quality land; and (ii)
the proposal allows for continued agricultural use where applicable and/or
encourages biodiversity improvements around arrays. See also a speech
by the Minister for Energy and Climate Change, the Rt Hon Gregory
4
Barker MP, to the solar PV industry on 25 April 2013 and written
ministerial statement on solar energy: protecting the local and global
environment made on 25 March 2015.
 that solar farms are normally temporary structures and planning
conditions can be used to ensure that the installations are removed when
no longer in use and the land is restored to its previous use;
 the proposal’s visual impact, the effect on landscape of glint and glare
(see guidance on landscape assessment) and on neighbouring uses and
aircraft safety;
 the extent to which there may be additional impacts if solar arrays follow
the daily movement of the sun;
 the need for, and impact of, security measures such as lights and
fencing;
 great care should be taken to ensure heritage assets are conserved in a
manner appropriate to their significance, including the impact of
proposals on views important to their setting. As the significance of a
heritage asset derives not only from its physical presence, but also from
its setting, careful consideration should be given to the impact of large
scale solar farms on such assets. Depending on their scale, design and
prominence, a large scale solar farm within the setting of a heritage asset
may cause substantial harm to the significance of the asset;
 the potential to mitigate landscape and visual impacts through, for
example, screening with native hedges;
 the energy generating potential, which can vary for a number of reasons
including, latitude and aspect.
The approach to assessing cumulative landscape and visual impact of large

scale solar farms is likely to be the same as assessing the impact of wind
turbines. However, in the case of ground-mounted solar panels it should be
noted that with effective screening and appropriate land topography the area
of a zone of visual influence could be zero.”
4. Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA)
4.1 Industrial installations for the production of electricity where the development
site area exceeds 0.5 hectares, falls under Schedule 2 to the Town and
Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017. As
such applications for major solar farm developments may need to be screened
by the Council to determine whether they constitute EIA development.
4.2 Applicants are advised to apply to the Council for an EIA Screening Opinion
before submitting their planning application. If a particular development
proposal is considered to be EIA development, the planning application must
be accompanied by an Environmental Statement that has been prepared in
accordance with Regulation 18 of the EIA Regulations 2017 (as amended).
4.3 Further advice as to the scope and level of detail of the information that is to
be provided in an Environmental Statement can be requested by submitting an
EIA Scoping Opinion to the Council.
5
5. Community Engagement
5.1 Solar farm developers will be required to demonstrate that they have
undertaken a high standard of public pre-application activity in line with the
Council’s Statement of Community Involvement (SCI, Effective pre-application
engagement allows local communities and others to gain a better
understanding of the project and its potential impacts. It also allows local
communities to make suggestions which the developer can consider when
developing and finalising their planning proposals. Local knowledge of the
area can help developers to omit unsuitable options and minimise impacts on
the local community where possible. Community engagement will also be
strongly encouraged during the construction period and operational life of the
solar farm to develop strong local relationships between the operator and the
local community
5.2 The Council can provide general advice on who, when and how to engage
with the local community. Further guidance is also contained in BRE NSC
(2015) Community Engagement Good Practice Guidance for Solar Farms.
6. Key Material Planning Considerations
6.1 The following section outlines some of the key planning considerations (as set
out in Policy 16 of the LPP2) that are likely to be relevant when determining
planning applications for major solar farm developments. Applicants are
advised to ensure that these matters in particular are adequately addressed
when submitting planning applications for major solar farm developments to
the Council. This includes any associated infrastructure and/or buildings that
might be necessary, such as substations, transformers, battery storage
facilities, power cables, fencing, access tracks, construction and operational
compounds, and connection to the National Grid.
6.2 The Council may consider the use of planning conditions to mitigate the
impacts of major solar farm developments, where it considers that conditions
could make the development acceptable and providing the conditions can
satisfy all of the tests set out in the NPPF (paragraph 56).
Compliance with Green Belt policy (where relevant)
6.3 Sites that are either wholly or partially within the Green Belt are required to be
determined in accordance with Green Belt policy. Applicants should be aware
that this can be a significant constraint on major solar farm developments.
6.4 Policy 21 of the LPP2, requires that all development within the Green Belt
complies with national Green Belt policy, as set out in the NPPF (chapter 13).
Paragraph 151 states that elements of renewable energy projects are likely to
6
be classed as ‘inappropriate development’, and therefore can only proceed if
‘very special circumstances’ (VSC) can be shown.
6.5 Inappropriate development is, by definition, harmful to the Green Belt and
such harm must be afforded substantial weight in the planning balance (as
must any other harm or harms that might be identified). Whilst the NPPF
(paragraph 151) acknowledges that VSC’s may include the wider
environmental benefits associated with increased production of energy from
renewable sources, in order for planning permission to be granted any such
potential benefit(s) must clearly outweigh any ‘definitional’ harm that might be
caused as well as any other potential harm(s) that might be caused by the
development (such as adverse effects on landscape, heritage or ecological
assets).
6.6 It will be insufficient for any potential VSC’s to merely outweigh any definitional
harm or other harm(s) to the Green Belt. The VSC’s must be shown to clearly
outweigh the harm or harms of development.
6.7 Applications for major solar farm developments that fall within the Green Belt
should be supported by a statement that appraises the impact of the proposed
development on the Green Belt (and its five purposes), setting out specifically
the VSC’s that are to be relied upon by the applicant to clearly outweigh any
harm or harms to the Green Belt that might be caused by the proposed
development.
Landscape & Visual Impacts
6.8 Rushcliffe’s predominantly rural landscape is a key part of the Borough’s

character and provides an attractive backdrop for its residents, visitors and
investors to live and work. Such landscapes also form an important part of the
Green Infrastructure network within the Borough. The landscape and visual
effects of major solar farm developments are likely to be one of the most
significant impacts arising from such development. Therefore, it is vital that
due consideration is given to these impacts at the earliest possible stage in
the site selection process and formulation of the design/layout of any proposal.
6.9 Policy 16 of the LPP1 sets out the strategic approach for the protection and
enhancement of existing Green Infrastructure as well as for the delivery of
new Green Infrastructure. The approach requires, amongst other things, that:
 existing Green Infrastructure corridors and assets are protected and
enhanced;
 where a development has an adverse impact on existing Green
Infrastructure the need for and benefit of the development will be weighed
against the harm caused; and,
 landscape character is protected, conserved or enhanced in line with the
recommendations of the Greater Nottingham Landscape Character
7
Assessment 2009 (GNLCA). The GNLCA divides the Rushcliffe into four
Regional Landscape Character Areas (shown at Appendix 1).
6.10 Policy 22(2)(i) of the LPP2 supports renewable energy developments within
the Countryside (i.e.: land outside of the Green Belt), providing the
appearance and character of the landscape, including any historic and/or
ecological features/local distinctiveness is conserved and enhanced.
6.11 All applications for major solar farm development will be expected to be
supported by an appropriate assessment in the form of either a Landscape
and Visual Assessment (LVA) or Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment
(LVIA), if the proposal is EIA development. Ideally such assessments should
be compiled following the guidance set out in the Guidelines for Landscape
and Visual Impact Assessments 3rd edition (GLVIA3) produced by the
Landscape Institute.
6.12 When assessing the significance of impacts a number of criteria should be

considered including:
a) the sensitivity of the existing landscape, having regard to its condition and
strength (as identified in the relevant detailed and summary descriptions at
appendix 9 of the GNLCA - see Appendix 2), and
b) the magnitude of the predicted change to the existing landscape character
from the proposed development.
6.13 Proposals that would involve the removal of significant sections of existing
field boundaries, such as hedgerows/trees, are unlikely to be considered
acceptable as they would be likely to irrevocably alter the character of the
existing landscape.
6.14 The PPG states that in assessing the impact on visual amenity, factors to
consider include establishing the area in which a proposed development may
be visible, identifying key viewpoints, the people who experience the views
and the nature of the views. These factors should be clearly assessed within
the LVIA or LVA submitted with the planning application.
6.15 Further guidance on the information that should be included within an LVIA or
LVA can be found at Appendix 3
Ecology & Biodiversity
6.16 As stated above, Rushcliffe’s predominantly rural landscape is a key part of

the Borough’s character and provides an attractive backdrop for its residents
and visitors alike. Additionally, this landscape supports a variety of ecological
assets that contribute to the biodiversity of the area.
8
6.17 Whilst large scale solar farm developments have the potential to provide
biodiversity enhancements that might otherwise not be secured on agricultural
land (for example the planting of additional trees and wildflower meadows that
can improve conditions for insects and other species), such developments
also have the potential to negatively impact existing ecological assets (for
example from habitat loss, fragmentation or displacement of species). The
nature and extent of such potential impacts will depend upon the scale of the
proposed development and the specific characteristics of the site and its
surrounding area.
6.18 Policy 17(1) of the LPP1 sets out a number of measures intended to increase
biodiversity within the Borough over the plan period (currently to 2028). These
measures include, amongst other things:
 seeking to ensure new development provides new biodiversity features,
and improves existing biodiversity features wherever appropriate;
 supporting the need for the appropriate management and maintenance of
existing and created habitats through the use of planning conditions,
planning obligations and management agreements; and
 ensuring that where harm to biodiversity is unavoidable, and it has been
demonstrated that no alternative sites or scheme designs are suitable,
development should as a minimum firstly mitigate and if not possible
compensate at a level equivalent to the biodiversity value of the habitat
lost.
6.19 Policy 17(3) is also clear that development on or affecting non-designated

sites or wildlife corridors with biodiversity value will only be permitted where it
can be demonstrated that there is an overriding need for the development and
that adequate mitigation measures are put in place.
6.20 In terms of ecology, Policy 1(6) of the LPP2 states that planning permission
will be granted for developments providing that there are no significant
adverse effects on important wildlife interest and where possible, the
application demonstrates net gains in biodiversity, known as Biodiversity Net
Gain (BNG). Policy 36 of the LPP2 seeks to protect designated nature
conservation sites, differentiating between national and local designations.
Development that adversely affects a Site of Special Scientific Interest (either
directly or indirectly), will not normally be permitted unless the benefits of the
development’s location clearly outweigh both the impacts that it is likely to
have on the features of the site that make it of special scientific interest and
any broader impacts on the national network of Sites of Special Scientific
Interest.
6.21 Similarly, at a local level, development that is likely to have a significant effect
on a Local Wildlife Site (LWS), a Local Geological Site (LGS), a Local Nature
Reserve (LNR) or Irreplaceable Habitats (such as ancient woodlands or
ancient/veteran trees) will not be permitted unless it can be clearly
9
demonstrated that there are reasons for the development that outweigh the
need to safeguard the essential nature conservation value of the site. Policy
37 of the LPP2 also specifically seeks to prevent adverse impacts upon
mature trees from development as well as the loss of ancient, semi-natural
woodland and ancient/veteran trees.
6.22 In terms of biodiversity, Policy 38 of the LPP2 sets out an expectation that all
development will preserve, restore and re-create priority habitats and the
recovery of priority species to achieve net gains in biodiversity. Developments
that significantly affect a priority habitat should avoid, mitigate or as a last
resort compensate any loss or effects. Additionally, development within a
Biodiversity Opportunity Area (BOA) should retain and sympathetically
incorporate locally valued and important habitats, including wildlife corridors
and steppingstones and be designed in order to minimise disturbance to
habitats and species. Outside of BOA’s developments should seek to achieve
net gains to biodiversity.
6.23 It is recommended that all planning applications for large scale solar farm
developments are supported by a detailed ecological survey, which should be
used to guide the site selection and site design process. The assessment
should also identify any ecological site mitigation measures and opportunities
for ecological enhancement and BNG in line with the policies refer to above.
Impacts from the development on any protected species and their habitats
should be avoided. Where they cannot be avoided (for example by locating to
an alternative site with less harmful impacts), they must be adequately
mitigated or, as a last resort, compensated for.
6.24 From November 2023, it will be a legal requirement that all developments
meet the ‘Biodiversity gain objective’. That means the biodiversity value
attributable to the proposed development exceeding the pre-development
biodiversity of the onsite habitat by at least 10%. Prior to this date, it is
strongly recommended that applications for large scale solar farm
developments seek to achieve at least 10% BNG onsite. It is also strongly
recommended that pre-biodiversity and post-biodiversity assessments of the
onsite habitat are carried out and submitted with the planning application.
6.25 In addition, a site management plan should be prepared and submitted that
demonstrates how the land around the proposed solar panels will be
managed, including providing a minimum of 10% BNG. This could include
enabling some low intensity animal grazing, the continued agricultural use of
the site or the creation of new habitats to improve on-site ecology. An
ecological monitoring programme may also be required to monitor any impacts
upon existing on-site flora; upon any particular features likely to support
species (e.g. bats, birds, reptiles, amphibians) and to inform any changes that
may be needed to the other particular habitats and species recorded on or
adjacent to the site and to inform any necessary changes to the site
10
management arrangements. The site management plan should include
maintenance and stewardship arrangements for the site covering both
landscape and ecology matters. This will help to ensure that appropriate
management and maintenance arrangements/funding mechanisms are
identified at an early stage.
6.26 The BRE National Solar Centre Biodiversity Guidance for Solar Developments
provides further guidance on how to support biodiversity on large scale solar
farms: NSC - Biodiversity Guidance (bre.co.uk).
Best Most Versatile Agricultural Land (BMV)
6.27 The NPPF states that planning policies and decisions should contribute to and
enhance the natural and local environment by recognising the intrinsic
character and beauty of the countryside, the wider benefits from natural capital
and ecosystem services, including the economic and other benefits of the best
and most versatile agricultural land.
6.28 As mentioned at paragraph 3.10 above, the PPG advises that the deployment
of large-scale solar farms can have a negative impact on the rural
environment. As such it advises that effective use of land should be
encouraged by focussing large scale solar farms on previously developed and
non-agricultural land (provided that it is not of high environmental value).
6.29 Given the rural nature of the Borough, it is acknowledged that there may not
be sufficient brownfield land available to accommodate large scale solar farm
developments. However, where the use of greenfield land is proposed, the
PPG1 advises that consideration should be given to whether the use of any
agricultural land has been shown to be necessary and poorer quality land (i.e.:
grades 3b, 4 and 5) had been used in preference to higher quality land; and
the proposal allows for continued agricultural use where applicable and/or
encourages biodiversity improvements around the arrays.
6.30 Similarly, Policy 1(12) of the LPP2 requires that proposed development has
regard to BMV agricultural land, with a preference for the use of lower quality
over higher quality agricultural land and minimising soil disturbance as far as
possible. Policy 16 d) of the LPP2 also requires that renewable energy
schemes are acceptable in terms of BMV agricultural land.
6.31 Applications for major solar farm developments will be expected to be

supported by a site specific assessment of the BMV of the application site and
include appropriate justification/mitigation if any higher quality land (i.e.:
grades 1, 2 and 3a) is to be used.
1 Paragraph 013 - Renewable and low carbon energy - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)
11
6.32 Further guidance on assessing development proposals on agricultural land
can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/agricultural-
land-assess-proposals-for-development/guide-to-assessing-development-
proposals-on-agricultural-land.
Historic Environment
6.33 As well the historic environment being a fundamental part of both national and
local planning policy considerations, the Council also has a statutory duty to
ensure that it is conserved and protected, with great weight being given to its
conservation. Major solar farm developments have a significant potential to
impact the historic environment, affecting heritage assets both above and
below the ground. Heritage assets can be either ‘designated’ or ‘non-
designated’.
6.34 Designated heritage assets are nationally important assets and include
scheduled monuments, listed buildings, registered parks and gardens, and
conservation areas. In Rushcliffe there are currently:
– 682 listed buildings, including 35 Grade I and 22 Grade II* and 625
Grade II;
– 27 Scheduled Monuments;
– 4 Registered Parks and Gardens; and
– 30 Conservation Areas.
6.35 Non-designated heritage assets are identified by the Council as assets of local
and regional importance. This category can include buildings, archaeological
sites, monuments, gardens and landscapes identified as having a degree of
significance meriting consideration in planning decisions, but which are not
formally designated heritage assets. The Conservation Area Appraisal and
Management Plans that have been produced for the majority of the
conservation areas in Rushcliffe may identify key unlisted buildings, as well as
important vistas and panoramic views and features which might be
considered, non-designated heritage assets.
6.36 Policy 11 of the LPP1, states that proposals that conserve and/or enhance the
historic environment and heritage assets and their settings will be supported.
Policy 28 of the LPP2 explains that proposals that affect heritage assets
and/or their setting will be required to demonstrate an understanding of the
significance of the asset(s) and their setting(s); identify the impact of the
proposed development upon them; and provide a clear justification for the
development in order that a decision can be made as to whether the merits of
the proposals for the site bring public benefits which decisively outweigh any
harm arising from the proposals. The supporting text to Policy 28 also
provides further information as to the criteria the Council will use when
determining whether a particular feature is a non-designated heritage asset.
12
6.37 Similarly, Policy 29 of the LPP2 requires that applications for developments
affecting known or potential archaeological sites be supported by an
appropriate archaeological assessment and evaluation. Planning permission
will not be granted without adequate assessment of the nature, extent and
significance of the remains present and the degree to which the proposed
development is likely to affect them. The footnote to paragraph 200 of the
NPPF indicates that non-designated assets of archaeological interest that are
demonstrably of equivalent significance to scheduled monuments should be
subject to the policies for designated heritage assets, as non-designated
heritage assets can also contribute to the character of the area.
6.38 All applications for major solar farm developments will be expected to be
supported by a detailed heritage assessment undertaken by a suitably
qualified heritage person/organisation. The assessment should identify any
designated heritage assets along with any non-designated heritage assets
located within, immediately adjacent or in the wider setting of the application
site. Ideally the assessment should include a search area of a minimum of
1km radius from the site boundary, in certain cases a larger area, for instance
where there may be an impact on long distance views.
6.39 In line with Policy 29, the heritage assessment should also include a desk
based archaeological assessment to identify any possible archaeological
remains of historical importance, with reference to the Historic Environment
Record, and propose further investigation, recording and mitigation as
necessary. This may include the preservation of archaeological interest in situ,
through recording or a mixture of these elements.
6.40 Further advice on historic environment issues relating to different types of

commercial renewable energy development proposals, including solar
photovoltaics (PV) is available from Historic England at:
https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/commercial-
renewable-energy-development-historic-environment-advice-note-
15/heag302-commercial-renewable-energy-development-historic-environment/
Open Space, Green Infrastructure Network & Other Recreational Uses
6.41 Public Open Spaces (POS) and other recreational routes, such as Public
Rights of Way (PROW), are important local amenities for local communities
within the Borough, that help to promote healthy lifestyles and wellbeing. As
such applications for large scale solar farm developments that would
adversely affect or result in the loss of POS or PROW’s, are unlikely to be
acceptable.
6.42 In setting the strategic approach to the delivery, protection and enhancement
of green infrastructure, Policy 16 of the LPP1 states that where any new
development would have an adverse impact on green infrastructure (such as
13
open spaces), alternative scheme designs that have no or little impact should
be considered before mitigation is provided. Moreover, the need for and
benefit of the development will be weighed against the harm caused.
6.43 Similarly, Policy 34 of the LPP2 seeks to protect green infrastructure assets,
including amenity space, nature conservation sites, rights of way and
woodlands from development that adversely affects their function, unless the
need for the asset is proven to no longer exist and the benefits of the
development in that location outweigh the adverse effects on the asset.
6.44 Policy 35 of the LPP2 requires that development within identified Strategic or
Local Green Corridors should ensure the primary functions of the network are
maintained and enhanced and opportunities to create additional green
infrastructure assets which enlarge the network should be taken. Development
on the edge of the main urban area (the urban fringe) must incorporate
accessible infrastructure that provides recreational opportunities, wildlife
benefits and enables pedestrian and cycle access to the wider countryside,
where possible.
6.45 Applications for major solar farm developments will need to demonstrate to the
satisfaction of Nottinghamshire County Council, in its capacity as the local
highway authority, that all PROW’s impacted upon by a proposal will remain
accessible to the general public and convenient for their use. Any PROW
running through the application site should be appropriately integrated into the
proposal so that it remains usable, retains its recreational amenity value both
during the construction phase and throughout the lifetime of the development.
In the event that a PROW is affected by the proposed development, details of
all works necessary to ensure its continued availability during and post
construction should be submitted with the planning application. In those
circumstances it is recommended that the views/advice of the Rights of Way
Team at Nottinghamshire County Council are sought in advance the
submission of any planning application.
6.46 Furthermore, if any PROW has to be temporarily or permanently diverted, then

no development should commence on site until an Order securing the
diversion of the existing definitive right of way has been agreed with both the
Borough and County Councils and the new route has been constructed and is
available for public use.
Site and Internal Access
6.47 Ideally access to the site should be achieved of a surfaced road. However,
where a site is isolated from a highway, the upgrading of an unsurfaced track
(unsurfaced road, by-way or bridleway) may be required to provide access for
construction and maintenance vehicles. This is likely to require physical
improvements to the access route which may change the appearance of the
14
track and the character of the area. Care should be taken to ensure changes
to the surface, width, boundaries and additional security features (which deter
potential fly-tipping and other criminal activity) along the access route
complement and do not significantly harm the character of the surrounding
area, especially in rural locations and where the route is also a public right of
way.
6.48 Equally, the same care should be taken to ensure changes to the surface and
width of internal access routes avoid the unnecessary urbanisation of site.
6.49 Where new and upgraded access routes provide opportunities to improve
public accessibility (linking public rights of way etc.) around the site, these
should be taken.
Grid Connection & Potential Generating Profile
6.50 Typically, electricity generated by a major solar farm development will be

linked via a cable to a transformer, which converts it to a higher voltage before
it enters the grid at a substation. Whilst the NPS EN-1 advises that ensuring a
suitable grid connection is the responsibility of the applicant, the Council may
need to be satisfied that there is no reason why, in principle, a grid connection
would not be possible. This can be demonstrated by submitting evidence of a
formal offer of a connection from the service provider, such as Western Power
Distribution (WPD) or similar relevant organisation, with the planning
application. Ideally, WPD (or similar) should be consulted prior to the
submission of a planning application, so that any technical constraints in
regard to grid connection can be considered and addressed to ensure the
development of the site is planned in the most effective way.
6.51 Applications for major solar farm developments should provide details of all
transformer/substation infrastructure required along with an indication of the
route of the cabling required to connect the development to the national grid.
The nature and extent of such cabling (e.g.: whether overhead or
underground) should be indicated. Such cabling should avoid areas of high
landscape, ecological or archaeological sensitivity, and should be designed so
as not to be extensive or visually intrusive. Where connection to the grid risks
causing an accumulation of overhead wiring in sensitive areas the cumulative
impact may need to be assessed.
6.52 Details of the electricity generating potential and profile of the proposed
development should also be provided with the application. This should include
information to demonstrate that the proposed panel layout maximises
coverage on the plot and optimises performance of the panels from both an
orientation and angle of panel perspective.
15
Form and Siting
6.53 It is important that major solar farm developments are as sympathetic to the
existing environment as possible, with minimal disruption during the
construction and operational phases of any development. Intrusive
groundworks, such as trenching and foundations, should be minimised and
the use of concrete avoided where possible.
6.54 Policy 10 of LPP1 requires that all new development is designed to make,
amongst other things, a positive contribution to the public realm and sense of
place; create an attractive, safe, inclusive and healthy environment; reinforce
valued local characteristics; and be adaptable to meet evolving demands and
the effects of climate change. The policy also requires that outside of
settlements new development should conserve or where appropriate, enhance
or restore landscape character and proposals will be assessed with reference
to the GNLCA (see Landscape and Visual Impacts section above and
appendix 2).
6.55 Policy 1 of the LPP2, states that planning permission for new development will
be granted provided that certain criteria, where relevant, are met. Criteria 1, 2,
4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 in particular are likely to be relevant to planning
applications for major solar farm developments. Policy 16(j) also requires
renewable energy developments to be acceptable in terms of their form and
siting.
6.56 Details of the scale and specification of the solar PV panels will be required
when assessing planning applications for major solar farm developments. The
extent of the array(s) and their angle(s) of repose should be specified, along
with the maximum height above ground level and the parameters of any
‘tracking’ element (for those panels that change angle to follow the path of the
sun), including the range of any height variation.
6.57 Ideally site levelling/re-grading and similar groundworks should be kept to a

minimum. Any such work that might be required to facilitate a major solar farm
development should be clearly detailed within the planning application, for
example by being shown on a series of existing and proposed cross section
drawings through the site.
Decommissioning and Restoration
6.58 The PPG2 identifies, as a particular planning consideration, that large scale
solar farms are normally temporary structures and advises that planning
conditions can be used to ensure that the installations are removed when no
longer in use and the land restored to its previous use. However, in most
cases the operational life span of such installations can range between 20-40
16
years. Policy 16 (k) of the LPP2 requires all renewable energy developments
to be acceptable in terms their decommissioning and the reinstatement of the
land at the end of their operational life. As such if planning permission for a
major solar farm development is granted, it is likely that the Council will seek
to impose a condition limiting the operational life of the development. Any
future proposal to extend the operational life of an approved development
would require a separate planning permission.
6.59 In addition, planning applications for major solar farm developments should
include details of how the site will be restored to its previous use/landform (if
altered) at the end of the operational life of the development, retaining any
landscape and biodiversity enhancements and/or community benefits that may
have been provided. Access routes should also be returned to their previous
condition. The details should outline the process and timescale for removing
all above ground structures, bases and foundations and equipment from the
land (including all security infrastructure and access tracks/roadways) and the
propose the restorative measures, such as the reseeding or re-profiling of the
land to its previous form. In order to assist decommissioning, construction of
the site should avoid unnecessary use of concrete and asphalt. If planning
permission is granted, it is likely that the Council will seek to impose a
condition requiring that the site is restored to its previous condition in a timely
manner at the end of the operational life of the development.
Cumulative Impacts
6.60 Individually, large scale solar farm developments can give rise to certain
effects on the environment however the cumulative effect of such
developments in combination with the effects from other similar developments
in the vicinity of the site can also be a key concern to the Council and is likely
to be a material planning consideration in the determination of any planning
application for large scale solar farms.
6.61 The PPG3 provides guidance for developers specifically in relation to the
production of LVIAs in respect of wind energy development and states that the
same guidance can also be applied to assessing cumulative impacts of large
scale solar farms too. The PPG also recommends that cumulative landscape
impacts and cumulative visual impacts are assessed separately. It also sets
out what type of information should be put together to inform an LVIA.
6.62 Ideally, all applications for large scale solar farm developments should be
supported by a Cumulative Impact Assessment (CIA), that assesses the
effects of the proposed development in combination with the effects of any
existing, permitted and proposed development (those likely to be determined
before or at the same time as the proposal) within the vicinity of the application
site that are likely to result in significant cumulative effects on the environment.
17
The CIA should also include an assessment of any relevant developments in
the vicinity of the site that lie outside the Council’s administrative area. The
applicant is advised that their CIA may need to be updated and revised during
the consideration of their application where new development proposals
emerge that could give rise to further cumulative effects in combination with
their proposed development.
6.63 As a minimum the guidance on cumulative effects set out in the PPG should
be followed. Additionally, the Planning Inspectorates Guidance Note No.17
provides useful guidance on the approach to producing a robust CIA and
should be considered as a starting point when preparing planning applications
for large scale solar farm developments, particularly those that are close to the
50MW generating capacity threshold.
Amenity, Pollution, Glint and Glare & Safety
6.64 Solar panels themselves do not generally make any significant noise when
generating electricity, although ancillary equipment, such as invertors,
transformers or sub-stations may produce noise. Any such noise generating
equipment should be carefully sited so as not to adversely affect any nearby
noise sensitive receptors (e.g.: people or wildlife).
6.65 In order to protect the amenity of residents, depending on their proximity to the
site and access routes, conditions may be required that restrict the hours of
construction and routes that construction lorries may take.
6.66 Generally, solar panels are designed to absorb as much light as possible
rather than reflect it. Nevertheless, there is the potential for glint and glare
effects. ‘Glint’ refers to a momentary flash of light produced as a direct
reflection of the sun whilst ‘glare’ is a more continuous source of brightness
relative to the ambient lighting. These effects can have a visual impact on the
landscape and can act as a potential hazard or distraction for motorists, pilots,
pedestrians and occupiers of nearby properties.
6.67 Policy 1 of the LPP2 requires all new development to achieve noise
attenuation and Policy 40 of the LPP2 stipulates that planning permission will
not be granted for development that would result in an unacceptable level of
pollution or is likely to result in unacceptable exposure to sources of pollution
or risks to safety. In line with the PPG4 due consideration must be given to the
impact of glint and glare from proposals for solar farms.
6.68 All planning applications for major solar farm developments will be expected to
be accompanied by a Glint and Glare Assessment that considers the potential
impact of glint and glare from the solar panels upon landscape/visual amenity,
aircraft, rail and road safety, local residents and users of public rights of way.
18
When developing proposals applicants are strongly advised to undertake pre-
application engagement with any relevant authorities (such as MAG East
Midlands Airport, the Military Aviation Authority, Network Rail, Highways
England and/or the Highways Authority at Nottinghamshire County Council) to
agree the scope of the assessment where the development has the potential
to affect such infrastructure.
6.69 Where a battery energy storage is proposed on the development site, a

management plan will be required to demonstrate how this facility will be
constructed and operated safely.
Flood Risk & Drainage
6.70 Given the surface area created by a rows of solar panel arrays clustered
together, major solar farm developments have the potential to effect the way
surface water runs off a site, particularly where the land was previously an
open field, and as such have the potential to increase flood risk.
6.71 Policy 17 of LPP2 is supportive of development proposals that are within

areas where a risk of flooding or problems of surface water disposal exist,
providing that the Sequential and Exception tests are applied and satisfied in
accordance with the NPPF and PPG. The policy also states that development
proposals within areas of flood risk will only be considered when accompanied
by a site specific flood risk assessment and such proposals will be expected to
include mitigation measures which protect the site and manage any residual
flood risk.
6.72 Policy 18 of the LPP2 requires that all development proposals identify
opportunities to incorporate a range of deliverable Sustainable Drainage
Systems, appropriate to the size and type of development. The choice of
drainage systems should comply with the drainage hierarchy within the PPG.
6.73 In line with Policies 17 and 18 of the LPP2, it is recommended that planning
applications for major solar farm developments within Flood Zones 2 and 3 or
within areas where surface water flooding is known to be a problem should be
accompanied by a site specific flood risk assessment that addresses all
potential sources of flooding. In addition, the management of surface water
needs to be considered carefully and regard had to all of the criteria (where
relevant) set out at Policy 18(2) of the LPP2.
Minerals Safeguarding
6.74 Policy 42 of LLP2 sets out that development will not be permitted which would
sterilise mineral resources of economic importance or pose a serious
hindrance to future extraction in the vicinity. Where development proposals
are located within minerals safeguarding areas, prior extraction of such
19
minerals will be encouraged, subject to whether this is practicable or
economically feasible.
Site Security (fencing and CCTV)
6.75 The Council recognises that major solar farm developments may need to be to
secure from unauthorised access and for health and safety reasons. The level
of security required for a particular solar farm development will depend to a
large extent on the location and the scale/extent of the site. Security
measures, depending on their nature have the potential to have an impact on
the landscape and visual amenity. Therefore, applicants should ensure that
any security measures, such as fencing, lighting installations or CCTV, used
as part of their proposal must be designed and located to minimise any
landscape and visual impacts.
6.76 Applications should seek to preserve open site lines across the countryside,
wherever possible. Where stronger boundary treatments are not visually
compatible with the existing landscape character, consider combining deer
type fencing with suitably monitored CCTV or Perimeter Intrusion Detection
Systems (PIDS) may provide a compromise solution.
6.77 The further guidance on the use of site security measures can be found in the
BRE Planning Guidance for the development of large scale ground mounted
solar PV systems
6.78 Applications for major solar farm developments will be expected to minimise
the use and height of security fencing and seek to make use of any natural
site features such as field hedges and trees, where possible. Applications
should include full details of all site security measures and features such as
perimeter fencing, CCTV cameras and lighting with significant consideration
given to mitigating their impact on wildlife and ecology. Applicants will be
expected to outline arrangements and specifications of site lighting with an
appropriate assessment of how any impact on landscape, ecology and nearby
communities will be minimised. Where fencing is proposed, these should
include suitable open sections at the bottom to allow small mammals identified
in the area to pass through. Any fencing should ensure it does not pose an
increased safety risk to all the PROW users, including equestrians and
cyclists.
7. Planning Obligations
7.1 Policy 19 of the LPP2 requires that all development will, amongst other things,
be expected to contribute to the delivery of necessary infrastructure to enable
the cumulative impacts of developments to be managed, including identified
transport infrastructure requirements and provide for the future maintenance of
facilities provided as a result of the development.
20
7.2 Some cases may require financial contributions, other cases may require the
details of mitigation measures to be included in an agreement so that a robust
legal mechanism is in place to ensure appropriate mitigation is carried out.
7.3 Other matters may be more appropriate to be covered by conditions. Each site
will be considered on its own merits and engagement will be had with the
relevant applicant/ stakeholders to identify such cases.
8. Appendices
Appendix 1 Plan of Regional Landscape Character Areas in Rushcliffe.
Appendix 2 Information to be included in a Landscape and Visual Impact

Assessment
Appendix 3 Appendices from Greater Nottinghamshire Landscape Character

Assessment (2009)
21
Appendix 1 Plan of Regional Landscape Character Areas in
Rushcliffe.
THE CHARACTER AREAS of RUSHCLIFFE NORTH
t
r en
(ref Nottinghamshire County Council Countryside Appraisal)
rT
ve Flintham
Ri
FLINTHAM l
Kneeton
TRENT WASHLANDS Sibthorpe
on
elt
Screveton
Sh
East
Bridgford
h
ort
SOUTH NOTTS FARMLANDS
sw
Flawborough
wk
Ha
Thoroton
Car Colston
Shelford
and Newton Scarrington
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE WOLDS
Aslockton Orston
Saxondale
Bingham
Radcliffe
VALE OF BELVOIR RADCLIFFE ON TRENT l
on Trent
BINGHAM l Elton
Holme Whatton
Pierrepont Cropwell
Butler
PARISH BOUNDARIES Gamston
WEST BRIDGFORD l
Tithby
Wiverton
Cotgrave Granby
West
0 1 2 3 4 5 Bridgford COTGRAVE l Cropwell Langar cum
Tollerton Bishop Barnstone
Cl
ips
SCALE in miles
ton
LANGAR l
e
Normanton Colston
RUDDINGTON l Plumtree
on the
Barton Owthorpe Bassett
Wolds
in Fabis Ruddington
Bradmore
Thrumpton Stanton on
KEYWORTH l the Wolds Kinoulton
Ratcliffe
on Soar Gotham Bunny Keyworth NOTE: Some Parishes are in more than one
Character Area.
Hickling
Widmerpool
Kingston
Wysall Dimensions should not be scaled from this
on Soar East
West Leake Leake
Costock plan and the scale is provided for guidance
EAST LEAKE l Thorpe in Upper Broughton
Willoughby
Sutton the Glebe
on the Wolds
Bonington
Rempstone
ar o
Normanton
er S
Stanford
on Soar Nottinghamshire
Ri
v on Soar
Rushcliffe County Council
Appendix 2: Information to be included in a Landscape and Visual
Impact Assessment
Information to be included within an LVIA or LVA
1. Description of the development
– The need for the development set within local, regional and national strategies;
– The timescale for construction, operation and decommissioning.
– The site’s location and overall layout;
– Solar panel design and specification, method of construction/installation;
– Reasonable estimates of quantity and type of traffic which will be generated
through construction and operation of the development.
2. Site Description
– Description of the main reasons for the site selection and any alternatives in site
design or layout which have been considered;
– Area of proposed land which the panels will occupy, clearly described and
indicated on a map or diagram;
– Illustrated description of the land use of the surrounding area;
– Description of the policies plans and designations which are relevant to the site;
– Evaluation of the direct, indirect, secondary and cumulative, short medium and long
term effects resulting from the existence of the development.
3. Landscape Baseline Conditions

– The current condition of the landscape;
– Use Greater Nottingham Landscape Character Assessment to provide the
framework landscape character information, supplemented by a study to assess
the specific impact of the development;
– Relationship of the site to any designated areas of landscape at a national, regional
or local level, and to areas of landscape value or scenic quality.
– Description of all baseline date sources, and methods used to supplement this
information;
– The landscape baseline should be evaluated in relation to its sensitivity and
importance. The sensitivity evaluation of each landscape element should reflect its
quality value, contribution to landscape character and the degree to which the
particular element or characteristic can be replaced or substituted.
4. Predictions of Impact
– Assessment of the scale, or magnitude of change to the landscape and visual
elements as a deviation from the baseline conditions. Consideration will need to
be given to visitor and resident populations, and seasonal variations;
– Provide a Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) diagram for the development
indicating as a minimum 1km, 2km, and 4km radii from the site;
– The methods used to establish the magnitude should be clearly described and be
appropriate and reasonable in relation to the importance of the landscape and
visual impact;
– Where assumptions or unsupported data has been used in the predictions, these
should be highlighted and accompanied by an indication of the reliability /
confidence of those assumptions or data;
– Evaluation of the direct, indirect, secondary and cumulative, short medium and long
term effects resulting from the existence of the development.
5. Impact Significance
– Clearly describe the judgements which underpin the attribution of significance;
– The assessment of significance should consider the impact’s deviation from the
established landscape baseline condition, the sensitivity of the landscape and
receptors and the extent to which the impact will be mitigated or is reversible;
– The range of factors which are likely to influence the assessment of significance
should be clearly identified;
– Provide detail of how these variables will affect the significance of the impacts over
the life of the development;
– Identify the significance of impacts that remain following mitigation.
6. Mitigation
– Describe the measures proposed to avoid, reduce and if possible, remedy
significant adverse impacts on both landscape character and visual amenity;
– Provide an indication of the effectiveness of the stated measures;
– Clearly indicate how the mitigation measures will be implemented.
7. Presentation of the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment

– The document should be clear and logical in its layout and presentation and be
capable of being understood by a non–specialist;
– It should be a balanced document providing an unbiased account of the landscape
and visual effects, with reasoned and justifiable arguments;
– A glossary of all technical terms and full reference list should be provided;
– Plans, diagrams and visual representations should be provided to assist in the
understanding of the development and its impact, and should be clearly labelled
with all locations reference in the text.
8. Non-Technical Summary
– A stand-alone document to be available to a non-specialist reader, to enable them
to understand the landscape and visual impacts of the proposal;
– To include a summary description of the development; the aspects of landscape
character and visual amenity likely to be significantly affected; the likely significant
effects; the mitigations measures to be implemented;
– Include as a minimum the plans, maps and other visual representations which
illustrate the location of the application site, the footprint of the development, and
the location of key features.
Source: Appendix A of the BRE ‘Planning guidance for the development of large scale ground
mounted solar PV systems’
https://www.bre.co.uk/filelibrary/pdf/other_pdfs/KN5524_Planning_Guidance_reduced.pdf
Appendix 3: Appendices from Greater Nottinghamshire
Landscape Character Assessment (2009)
DPZ within this Regional Character Area:
NW01 Gotham and West Leake Wooded Hills and Scarps

NW02 East Leake Rolling Farmland
NW03 Widmerpool Clay Wolds
NW04 Cotgrave Wooded Clay Wolds
Key Characteristics
• Defined by a low boulder clay plateau traditionally known as ‘wolds’

(elevated tracts of open land);
• Closely associated with a dissected glacial plateau comprising variable
thicknesses of boulder clay overlying Lower Lias and Rhaetic Beds;
• Broad area of low hills which extend to the Soar Valley thinning out to a
series of hills in the north. Gotham and West Leake are the most
prominent;
• Rhaetic beds provide a low steeply inclined escarpment which forms a
continuous boundary above Cropwell Bishop broken only by the valleys of
Fairham Brook and other minor streams;
• Soils are predominantly strong clayey matrix containing chalk stones and
lenses of fine loamy material which are difficult to cultivate although
loamy coarse soils are present to the west of the region;
• Erosion by streams has stripped away covering glacial drift to create a
series of deep valleys separated by ridges of higher ground. The most
prominent is Kingston Brook, a narrow corridor flanked by steeply rising
hills;
• Most streams flow west towards the River Soar except Fairham Brook
which flows north to the River Trent;
• Distinctive rural character and feeling of seclusion from urban centres;
• Small red brick and pantile roofed villages interconnected by narrow
winding country lanes;
• Larger commuter settlements with residential estates on their fringes and
small older centres within the northern and western parts of the region;
• Red brick and pantile roof farmsteads are common within the area
although many farms contain larger modern buildings constructed in
metal or timber;
• Industrial influences have a localised effect on the area such as Ratcliffe
on Soar Power Station, and gypsum works at East Leake and Gotham;
• Narrow lanes bordered by hedgerows and frequent hedgerow trees
(mostly ash with some oak);
• Extensive areas of continuous pasture and arable farming;
• Well defined and recognisable pattern of hedged fields and woodland;
• Medium to large scale regular and semi-irregular field pattern, this is less
distinctive in arable fields; older smaller field patterns are present in
pastoral fields close to village fringes;
• Ridge and furrow present within pastoral fields;
• Hedgerows are mostly hawthorn, most are well maintained and intact
although around arable fields their condition is more variable;
• Broad-leaved woodland is variable across the area and ranges in size
creating areas of high and low enclosure; the most prominent and mature
is on high ground covering the hills to the north at Gotham and West
Leake and around Cotgrave;
• Smaller woodland copses and coverts are common and exert a localised
influence particularly where present on high ground;
• Hills characterised by large regular blocks of mature broad-leaved
woodland, scarp grasslands and pasture and long arable fields which
extend down the slopes;
• Pockets of wooded parkland provide an element of formality and
enclosure within the landscape such as Stanford Hall and Kingston Hall;
• Small streams notable through the presence of willows and riparian
shrubs; and
• Willow pollards are common within this area.
Guidelines and Recommendations

• Enhance the broad-leaved character of existing woodlands;
• Identify opportunities for new woodland planting on suitable sites;
• Conserve the sparsely settled rural character of the landscape;
• Conserve the traditional built form character and pattern of rural
settlements;
• Conserve all areas of permanent pasture particularly where present close
to villages and along streams;
• Promote measures for conserving and enhancing the historic features
such as ridge and furrow;
• Conserve the historic pattern of hedgerows along rural lanes;
• Conserve the semi-irregular small to medium scale field pattern around
villages and medium to large scale field pattern throughout remainder of
the area;
• Restore the traditional pastoral character and diversity of scarp
grasslands;
• Promote measures to enhance the semi-natural appearance of scarp
woodland;
• Conserve the balance of woodland and farmland on scarp hills;
• Conserve the riparian character of stream corridors through retention and
replanting of streamside trees and scrub;
• Conserve willow pollards where present along stream corridors;
• Conserve the character of village side pastoral landscapes; and
• Promote measures for achieving a better integration of new and existing
development in the countryside.
NW01 Gotham And West Leake Hills And Scarps
CONTEXT
Regional Character Area:
Nottinghamshire Wolds
LDU Reference: 113, 128, 66, 425, 251,
252 ,187, 258
DPZ Reference: NW01
CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES
• Series of prominent individual hills with steep sometimes scarp slopes and broad plateaus
• Hills are the dissected northern extent of a low boulder clay plateau extending from Leicestershire
traditionally known as ‘The Wolds’
• Rural character although urban elements such as villages, power station, industry and quarrying are
frequent in the landscape
• Kingston Brook is a localised feature on low ground between hills characterised by riparian woodland
and some grazing pasture at its margins
• Land use is a mixture of woodland, arable and pasture. Arable is on the lower and more gentle slopes,
pasture close to rivers, settlements and scarp grassland where the land is steeply sloping precluding
machinery from working the land
• Field pattern is mostly modern although pockets of older field systems such as irregular geometric and
geometric and those reflecting open fields are present
• Field pattern in places sweeps down the slopes and is a distinctive feature
• Field boundaries are mostly hedgerows on the slopes with fences often present on higher ground
• Woodland is generally on high ground across the hills although there are smaller pockets of woodland
on lower ground as establishing scrub and along village fringes/areas of former quarry
• Prominent extensive woodland plantation covers the slopes and high ground, often on steep scarps
• Rides and areas of open land are interspersed between plantation woodland
• Wooded tracks with spring flowering understorey planting along tracks up hills
• Large commuter settlements such as Gotham and East Leake and smaller settlements such as West
Leake are nestled at the base of the hills on the fringes of the DPZ
• Infrequent individual farms within the character area often on the slopes or high ground. A row of
individual modern houses is present along Ash Lane. One distinctive red brick and pantile roof
farmstead on Bunny Hill is set within gardens with a small orchard
• Buildings are mostly red brick with older properties having red pantile roofs
• Church towers and spires are prominent within a uniform village skyline
• Overhead lines are prominent on low ground between hills
• Small former spring (Wheldon Spring) on Gotham Hill is a localised feature characterised by a
depression in the ground and establishing scrub
• Enclosed channelled views on low ground between hills with extensive panoramic views across
towards Nottingham City and beyond from high ground
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
A series of distinctive wooded hills with arable fields on lower and
gentler slopes and pasture and pockets of grassland on the steeper
slopes. Views are extensive and often over long distances from the
high ground although become more enclosed from lower ground.
Urban elements are frequent with views of Ratcliffe on Soar Power
Station and the gypsum works. Some villages such as Gotham
village are characterised by modern edges and a small older core
with a distinctive church spire. Others such as West Leake are small
and distinctive focused along a single street with small working
farms and lack of modern development.
Land use is a mix of plantation woodland, arable farming and

pasture. Fields are mostly medium to large in size with the majority
of arable farming being a modern field pattern; although at Gotham
there is evidence of older irregular geometric patterns. Pockets of
fields reflecting open field system and regular geometric patterns
are present on lower slopes or pockets of high ground. Older field
patterns are generally used for pasture.
Woodland comprises large geometric field sized blocks of both

broadleaved and conifer woodland. On West Leake Hill a large
woodland is used for commercial forestry with rides and various
belts of different species within woodlands. Other vegetation
includes smaller frequent copses at the base of slopes and around
settlements. Frequent hedgerow trees and intact hedgerows are
present across the area. Pockets of regenerating scrub are often
around village fringes or on the base of slopes.
The landscape condition is GOOD. Hedgerows and woodland are

well managed, although there is some evidence of field boundary
fragmentation in places. Where hedgerows have been replaced, the
timber fencing is usually in good condition. The agricultural land is
well managed and features are intact with little sign of decline.
Landscape Strength
This DPZ is a distinctive series of hills which are prominent within
the surrounding area. They often form a backdrop to views from the
southern edges of Nottingham. From high ground within the DPZ
there are open expansive views to the centre of Nottingham and
lower-lying farmland at Ruddington and Bunny.
The strength of character is STRONG. The hills are distinctive and

consistent features across the landscape and exert their influence
within the surrounding area. The pattern of arable, pasture and
woodland is also consistent with moderate sized villages and some
expanding commuter villages present on low ground.
The overall landscape strategy is
CONSERVE.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Conserve the distinctive pattern of hills with large blocks of woodland on high ground
• Conserve the older field patterns within the character area such as those reflecting open systems and the irregular
and regular geometric patterns
• Conserve the balance of arable farming on lower slopes and pasture on steeper and higher slopes
• Conserve field patterns which sweep down the hills
• Conserve the landform of the former Wheldon Spring
• Conserve the diversity of broadleaf and large-scale woodland plantations on hills
• Ensure new conifer planting includes belts of broadleaf woodland and woodland edge along its fringes
• Any new woodland planting should be small in scale along the base of slopes becoming larger and of field size on
higher slopes
• Conserve the small rides and various ages of woodland within the character area
• Conserve the wooded tracks along the ridgelines
• Conserve hedgerows and encourage infill planting within gaps rather than erection of timber fencing
• Conserve areas of rough grassland where present on steeper scarp slopes
Built form
• Conserve the frequency of small farmsteads and outbuildings throughout the landscape; any new barn
developments should be small scale and fit within the existing pattern and vernacular styles
• Conserve the small linear and vernacular character of West Leake
• Conserve the uniform roofline of villages with prominent church spires
• Encourage the use of red brick and red pantile roofs for new buildings and extensions
• Conserve the nucleated character of larger villages
• Minimise the influence of larger settlements such as East Leake through small-scale woodland planting to reduce
the scale and frequency of urban edges within views
Other development/ structures in the landscape
• Conserve the winding character of rural lanes with expansive channelled views between hills
• Ensure any new industrial development is nestled on low ground and has well wooded boundaries which integrate
with woodland on higher ground to reduce its visibility
NW02 East Leake Rolling Farmland
CONTEXT
Regional Character Area: Nottinghamshire
Wolds
LDU Reference: 268, 247, 186, 365, 364
DPZ Reference: NW02
• Rolling landscape which forms part of the wider glacial plateau of chalky boulder clay overlying lower
lias and Rhaetic beds
• Undulations in the landscape are formed by small streams and tributaries which have cut through
softer mudstones and clays; Kingston Brook is the most distinctive
• Localised man-made earthworks present around Ratcliffe Power Station which have a localised
influence on character
• Frequent watercourses which are often demarcated by clusters of riparian willows along their course;
where trees are not present watercourses are generally not visible in the landscape
• Rural character present across the area although there are views towards urban elements such as
Ratcliffe on Soar Power Station visible above hills, a gypsum works and village fringes
• Land use is arable and some pasture. Pasture becomes more prominent around East Leake where it is
mostly horse grazing and around Rempstone where sheep grazing is more common
• Field pattern includes small, medium and large-scale fields recognised within the Historic Landscape
Characterisation as being a mix of ages including regular, semi-regular geometric and irregular field
patterns. Arable field pattern tends to be of modern origin
• Oldest field enclosures are often concentrated around watercourses and smaller settlements
• Field boundaries are almost all hedgerows which are generally intact and comprise mostly hawthorn;
around horse grazing areas electric and timber and wire fencing is present which has a localised
influence in character particularly along the southern fringe of East Leake
• There are few hedgerow trees within the landscape; this in combination with low hedgerows creates
an open character to fields. Hedgerow trees tend to be concentrated around smaller pastoral fields
• Relatively low level of woodland cover comprising prominent geometric blocks of woodland on high
ground, infrequent hedgerow trees, and clumps along watercourses including willow pollards. The
most significant blocks of woodland are at Stanford Hall and the formal lake and entrance at Kingston
Hall around the parkland margins which includes ornamental species
• Parkland is a distinctive feature around Kingston Hall and Stanford Hall where permanent pasture and
parkland trees are prominent
• Prominent halls framed by vistas of trees such as lime avenues. Formal brick wall boundaries define
the edges of parkland
• Small estate cottages at Kingston on Soar and lodge houses are features in these areas
• One large nucleated commuter settlement is at East Leake; the southern edge of the village is
prominent within views
• Costock is a small linear settlement with a pocket of prominent new development concentrated along
the western edge
• New apartment buildings for Nottingham Trent University are a localised urbanising feature within the
landscape and contrast with other smaller-scale buildings
• Network of farms each often contains a large red brick and pantile roofed farmstead with modern
timber or metal outbuildings; older red brick barns are also frequent
• Views vary from enclosed and channelled views from lower ground along watercourses to open often
expansive views from higher ground, particularly to the south and beyond the borough boundary
• Views are rural in character, with frequent dispersed villages and open farmland; small woodland
blocks are a feature on high ground
• A sand and gravel quarry has a localised influence on the landscape character of the DPZ
• Roads through the area often have narrow grassed ditches on either side
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
This area is characterised by its gently rolling landform with a
prominent river corridor along Kingston Brook. It has a rural
character with open views across mostly arable farmland with
localised enclosure along smaller pastoral fields. Small villages,
frequent farmsteads and two parkland estates are features.
Fields are a mixture of small fields close to watercourses and large-

scale fields which are mostly arable with some pasture farming.
These include both modern and older enclosures. Older enclosures
are around the watercourse and village fringes.
The area has a low level of woodland cover. Woodland tends to be

small broadleaved geometric blocks on high ground which gives
them greater prominence in the landscape. Other woodland is
concentrated within parkland around the fringes of halls and
contains coniferous and ornamental species. Parkland trees are also
distinctive in these areas.
The landscape condition is MODERATE. Features are generally well

maintained although there is evidence of fragmentation where fields
have expanded and where fields are subdivided for horse grazing
using electric tape and fencing. The man-made landform changes
around the power station have an influence.
Landscape Strength
Views are often over quite long distances due to the undulating
landform. On high ground views extend to Ratcliffe on Soar Power
Station and the hills surrounding it and across rolling farmland
towards Leicestershire. The character of this landscape extends into
Leicestershire so when viewed from outside the area is seen in this
context; it is screened to the north by Bunny Hill, Gotham Hill and
West Leake Hill.
The strength of character of the area is STRONG. The area has a

strong intact rural character with arable and pasture farming,
prominent small woodlands, villages and a network of farmsteads
key features. A minor amount of fragmentation is present in the
The overall landscape strategy is CONSERVE
north of the area where land has been altered adjacent to the power AND ENHANCE.
station.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Conserve the older field patterns within the character area such as those reflecting open systems and the semi-
regular geometric patterns
• Conserve the prominence of woodlands on high ground
• Conserve and enhance the regular dispersal of small geometric broadleaved copses and woodlands often on high
ground
• Conserve the rural character with built form infrequent in views
• Conserve hedgerows and where present ensure that infill planting is undertaken where gaps occur rather than
infilling or replacement with fencing
• Enhance the distribution of hedgerow trees by encouraging greater planting of trees within hedgerows. Species
used should be a mostly ash with some oak.
• Conserve the formal parkland and pasture within Kingston and Stanford Halls
• Conserve the ornamental broadleaved woodlands around the parkland fringes enclosed by red brick walls
• Conserve the framed vistas towards the halls from adjacent roads
• Conserve areas of permanent pasture where present in the DPZ and ensure that hedgerows and hedgerow trees at
the boundaries are maintained
• Restore hedgerows and encourage planting of new hedgerow trees to provide unity between more open land at
East Leake and the more enclosed and wooded pasture fields.
• Conserve and enhance the character of watercourses through retention of willow pollards and planting of new
riparian vegetation
• Conserve and enhance the small scale field pattern present along watercourse fringes; where arable farming is
present encourage new tree planting to integrate the fields with smaller pastoral fields
Built form
• Conserve the estate character of Kingston on Soar and the estate lodges at entrances to halls
• Conserve the regular distribution of built form and villages within the DPZ
• Enhance the fringes of the new apartment buildings at University of Trent through localised woodland planting
• Conserve the rural scale and vernacular style of buildings in smaller villages through restricting new development.
Where development occurs it should make a positive contribution to the local vernacular, scale and massing of the
village.
• Conserve the use of red brick and pantile roofs within farmsteads, barns and properties in villages
• Minimise the influence of larger settlements such as East Leake through small-scale woodland planting along
fringes
• Conserve and enhance the character of hedgerow trees lining roads through the landscape
• Ensure that on completion of quarrying that hedgerow trees, hedgerows and small woodlands are encouraged
within the restoration proposals to ensure that the land integrates with the surrounding land
• Conserve grassed ditches along the edge of roads
NW03 Widmerpool Clay Wolds
CONTEXT
Wolds
LDU reference: 187,191
DPZ reference: NW03
• Rolling landscape which forms part of the wider glacial plateau of chalky boulder clay overlying lower
lias and Rhaetic beds
softer mudstones and clays
• Distinctive steep slopes present along the western edge of the DPZ
• Frequent watercourses which are often demarcated by landform and riparian trees along their course
• Remote rural character present across the area although there are views towards the urban edge of
Keyworth in the north
• Land use is a mixture of arable and pasture although pasture becomes more dominant approaching
Widmerpool and Willoughby-on-the-Wolds where the land is continuous pasture and is particularly
distinctive
• Field pattern includes medium to large scale regular, semi-regular geometric and irregular field
patterns. An area reflecting one of the earliest forms of enclosure within Nottinghamshire is present as
a cluster around Thorpe-in-Glebe
• Field boundaries are almost all hedgerows which are generally intact and comprise mostly hawthorn
although blackthorn, field maple and hazel are present in places
• Around larger fields, hedgerows show some sign of fragmentation and replacement with timber post
and wire and stockproof fencing. In places parkland style fencing provides an element of formality
along roads
• Areas of ridge and furrow are locally distinctive
• Woodland comprises a mix of small linear belts, geometric copses and coverts on high ground and
around large farmsteads and halls on village fringes
• Wooded impression created through frequent blocks of small woodland, hedgerow trees and mature
hedgerows
• The railway is a prominent wooded feature within the landscape
• Prominent Roman road (Fosse Way) is visible within the landscape, traffic movement on it provides a
slight urbanising feature
• Frequent small nucleated villages which have a remote and rural character with concentrations of
distinctive vernacular buildings and some more modern additions
• Farmsteads are frequent within the landscape, and they often contain a large red brick and pantile
roofed farmstead with modern timber or metal outbuildings; older red brick barns are also frequent
• Some villages are set on slightly higher ground and are visible within the landscape. Woodland and
trees along the boundaries reduces their prominence and edges are often seen as individual or small
clusters of buildings
• Thorpe Le Glebe, a former medieval village site is discernible through undulations within the ground
• Wooded formal parkland present around Widmerpool is a local feature of the landscape
• Views vary from enclosed and channelled views from lower ground to open often expansive views
from higher ground
• Views are rural in character with dispersed village fringes and small woodland blocks a feature on high
ground
• Distinctive long distance views along western edge of DPZ on the A606 across the adjacent Vale of
Belvoir flat farmland
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
This area is characterised by its gently rolling landform dissected by
frequent small wooded streams. The DPZ has a strongly rural and
remote character with a mix of arable and pasture farmland and a
regular dispersed pattern of small copses and coverts often on
higher ground
Fields are a mixture of medium to large scale fields and include

pasture and arable farming with both modern and older enclosures.
Around Thorpe in Glebe the field pattern is much smaller and regular
and represents one of the oldest patterns in the county. The land
has a slightly more enclosed character within this area.
The area has a wooded impression although relatively low woodland

cover. Woodland comprises small geometric shaped coverts and
copses and some smaller linear blocks on the edges of fields. Most
is broadleaved and on high ground. A small area of ornamental and
conifer woodland is present around Widmerpool Hall to the south
west of Widmerpool.
The landscape condition is GOOD. Features are generally well

maintained although there is a minor amount of fragmentation
where fields have expanded in the south and north of the area.
Landscape Strength
Views are either local short distance views from low ground or
expansive long distance views from higher ground over rolling
landform with frequent woodland and farmsteads. There is a
particularly distinctive view along the A606 from the plateau to
lower ground in the Vale of Belvoir. The escarpment on the eastern
edge of the character area forms a backdrop to views within the
Vale of Belvoir.
The character strength of the area is STRONG. The area has a

strong intact rural character with arable and pasture farming and
pockets of woodland key features. There is a minor amount of
fragmentation where fields have expanded in the south and north of
CONSERVE.
the area. In these places hedgerows trees in fields are a remnant of
a former pattern.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Conserve the older field patterns within the character area such as those reflecting open systems and the semi-
regular geometric patterns
• Conserve and maintain open views along A606 from high ground to the Vale of Belvoir
• Conserve the regular dispersed patterns of small geometric broadleaved copses and woodlands often on high
ground
infilling with fencing
• Conserve the regular distribution of hedgerow trees and ensure that where overmature and senescent that a
programme for replacement is undertaken. Species used should be mostly ash with some oak.
• Conserve ridge and furrow and the earth mounding of the deserted medieval village at Thorpe in Glebe
• Conserve the formal wooded parkland adjacent to Widmerpool
• Conserve areas of permanent pasture to maintain the pastoral character of the DPZ
Built form
• Conserve the rural character of villages within the DPZ through ensuring any infill respects the key characteristics
and local built form vernacular
• Conserve the sparse distribution of built form and villages within the DPZ
• Conserve the small scale and vernacular style within smaller villages through restricting new development. Where
development occurs it should make a positive contribution to the local vernacular, scale and massing of the village
• Conserve the use of red brick and pantile roofs within farmsteads, barns and properties within villages
• Conserve the dispersed nature of village edges through retention and new planting to maintain the appearance of
individual or small groups of properties
• Minimise the influence of larger settlements such as Keyworth through small-scale woodland planting along fringes
• Conserve the narrow winding, rural and remote character of lanes through the DPZ
• Industry is not present or visible within this landscape and this should be conserved through careful consideration
of siting of development and planting works
NW04 Cotgrave Wooded Clay Wolds
CONTEXT
Wolds
LDU Reference: 188,189,190
DPZ Reference: NW04
• Gently undulating broad plateau and escarpment which forms the northern extent of a glacial plateau
of chalky boulder clay overlying lower lias and Rhaetic beds
• Distinctive steep slopes present along the northern edge of the DPZ
• Watercourses flow through the area and have a local influence on landform
• Rural character present across the area although there are views towards urban edges of Keyworth,
Cotgrave and properties on A606
• Land use is mostly arable although pockets of pasture are present around village fringes
• Field pattern includes medium to large sized geometric field patterns. Much of the enclosure is of
modern origin but there are pockets of older enclosure around Clipston and adjacent to the A46
• Field boundaries are almost all hedgerows managed at a low height. They comprise mostly hawthorn
although blackthorn, field maple and hazel are present in places
• Around larger fields, hedgerows show some sign of fragmentation and replacement with timber post
and wire and stockproof fencing
• Woodland comprises two distinctive large plantations on high ground: Clipston Wood and Cotgrave
Forest; and Borders Wood. This is plantation woodland; the conifers are distinctive and contrast with
smaller broadleaved woodlands found elsewhere across Rushcliffe. The plantation pattern still retains
the former field pattern; small rides within the woodland often are along former field boundaries
• Small linear belts and clumps of woodland are present along village fringes and along watercourses.
Willow is common in these locations
• Woodland on the escarpment is on higher ground and is prominent along the northern fringes of this
DPZ
• Few hedgerow trees and low hedgerows provides a contrast between enclosed woodland and open
farmland
• Prominent Roman Road (Fosse Way) is visible from high ground and traffic movement on it provides a
slight urbanising feature
• Large nucleated villages although their fringes are screened and filtered by small linear blocks of
woodland
• Smaller linear settlements also present such as Clipston
• Some villages are set on slightly higher ground and are visible as a single line of individual properties
dispersed within trees
• Few large farmsteads which are often of modern design and construction with large modern barns
• Farmsteads constructed from red brick with red pantile and clay tile roofs are common
• Views vary from short distance views enclosed by woodland to open views over gently rolling land
from higher ground
• Views are rural in character, although urban elements such as village fringes and the A46 reduce the
sense of seclusion and tranquillity
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
This area is characterised by its gently undulating plateau, steep
escarpment to the north and large prominent blocks of conifer
plantation woodland and arable fields.
Fields are a mixture of medium to large scale fields which are

mostly arable with pasture present in small amounts close to village
fringes. Field pattern includes both modern and older enclosures.
The oldest areas of enclosure are on steeper slopes to the south of
Cotgrave and south of Clipston.
Woodland is large and prominent in this landscape comprising two

large blocks of conifer plantation of roughly uniform age. It is
distinctive and contrasts with the small broadleaved woodlands
around village fringes and the riparian willows and poplars along
small streams. There are few hedgerow trees present which creates
an open character between woodlands.
The landscape condition is MODERATE. Features are generally well

maintained although there is evidence of fragmentation where fields
have expanded for intensive arable farming.
Landscape Strength
Views are generally quite open and towards woodland and village
fringes. Close to the woodlands views are foreshortened and more
enclosed. The large blocks of woodland and escarpment are
prominent features particularly to the north where they form a
backdrop to views over lower-lying gently undulating farmland.
The character strength of the area is MODERATE. The area has a

rural character with arable farming and pockets of woodland as key
features. There is a minor amount of fragmentation where fields
have expanded in the south and north of the area and increases in
urban elements and alterations to roads exert an increasingly
The overall landscape strategy is ENHANCE.
urbanising influence.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Conserve the older field patterns within the DPZ such as those reflecting open systems and the irregular geometric
patterns
• Encourage planting of small-scale broadleaved woodland along village fringes
• Enhance the fringes of conifer plantations with belts of native locally appropriate broadleaved woodland and
woodland edge species
infilling with fencing
• Conserve existing hedgerow trees and ensure that where over-mature or senescent, a programme for replacement
is undertaken. Species used should be mainly ash with some oak
• Conserve areas of permanent pasture to maintain the pastoral character on the village fringes
• Restore hedgerows and encourage planting of new hedgerow trees to provide unity between more open arable land
and the more enclosed woodland.
Built form
• Enhance village fringes through woodland planting and maintaining the appearance of dispersed development along
the fringes
• Conserve the linear character of villages such as Clipston
• Conserve and enhance the character of Clipston through use of red brick and pantile roofs and maintain its
connection to farming through retaining working farms
• Conserve the dispersed nature and vernacular style of smaller villages through restricting new development. Where
this occurs development should make a positive contribution to the local vernacular, scale and massing of the
village and not make built form more prominent within the wider landscape.
• Encourage the use of red brick and pantile roofs within farmsteads, barns and properties within villages
• Reduce the prominence of traffic movement along the A46 through planting of hedgerow trees and small belts of
woodland to reduce its appearance in views
SOUTH NOTTINGHAMSHIRE FARMLANDS
SN01 Clifton Slopes

SN02 Ruddington Alluvial Farmland
SN03 Mickleborough Fringe
SN04 Cotgrave and Tollerton Village Farmlands
SN05 East Bridgford Escarpment Farmlands
SN06 Aslockton Village Farmlands
Key Characteristics
• This is a large tract of land between the southern edge of Greater

Nottingham and the urban fringes of Newark;
• It is closely associated with a belt of Triassic rocks to the south of the
River Trent and is the largest single geological formation within
Nottinghamshire;
• The geology is mostly Mercia Mudstone which comprises reddish
mudstones with occasional hard sandstone (Skerries). This is less
developed than elsewhere in Nottinghamshire and creates a fairly uniform
gently rolling lowland landform;
• A low escarpment is present on the south eastern boundary where the
uppermost beds of Mercia Mudstone pass onto Rhaetic beds;
• Alluvium is present in hollows and depressions laid down as a result of
gypsum solution in the upper layers of the land surface. This formed low-
lying alluvium separated by narrow mudstone ridges which are 5-
10metres above the alluvium;
• The highest land is along the edge of the Trent Valley where a line of hills
falls sharply to the low-land of the Trent Washlands region;
• The land is dissected by streams in the north creating two prominent hills
at Wilford and Clifton;
• Small nucleated settlements tend to be concentrated on traditionally high
mudstone ridges; there is a lack of built form on lower alluvium basins;
• Closer to Nottingham, villages have expanded considerably which exerts
an urbanising influence on the landscape;
• Arable farmland is predominant although pasture is present along some
stream margins, escarpment slopes and village fringes;
• Uniform sometimes monotonous character created by large tracts of
arable farmland with few other notable features;
• Strong pattern of medium to large-scale hedged fields with smaller village
side pasture;
• Low-lying alluvium ‘basins’ such as Ruddington Moor, Bennington Fen
and along the Rivers Smite and Devon are characterised by intensive
arable farming with frequent ditches and drainage dykes. There is little
woodland or hedgerows present in these areas;
• Hedgerows are of variable condition, they tend to be intact along lanes
and in pasture fields and less intact, smaller and often fragmented around
arable fields;
• Hedgerow trees are mostly ash with some oak and willow. Frequent
young lime and horse chestnut trees have been planted along roads and
are a notable feature;
• General lack of woodland within the area with few hedgerow trees
enables open extensive views across the area;
• Where present woodland tends to be small geometric plantations, the
general lack of woodland means these are prominent features;
• Pockets of isolated mature parkland are prominent wooded features;
remnant parkland exists where land has been ploughed for arable farming;
• Trees and woodland along fringes of villages creates an impression of
higher tree cover than actually exists; and
• Frequent overhead lines and pylons are prominent vertical features, their
scale emphasised by the lack of other vertical structures such as
woodland.
• Conserve and enhance the overall structure and traditional agricultural

character of the landscape;
• Conserve and strengthen the simple pattern of medium to large hedged
fields;
• Identify opportunities for enhancing the structure and unity of the
landscape through new tree and woodland planting;
• Conserve the character and setting of village settlements;
• Promote measures for achieving better integration of new and existing
features in the countryside;
• Conserve the character of areas of pasture where present particularly
along village fringes;
• Conserve the remote undeveloped character of low-lying alluvium areas;
• Conserve parkland where present and retain the character of parkland
pasture with frequent individual specimen trees;
• Conserve woodland; and
• Enhance visual unity between arable and pastoral farming through small-
scale woodland planting and, where appropriate, by strengthening the
traditional pattern of hedged fields.
SN01 Clifton Slopes
CONTEXT
Regional Character Area: South
Nottinghamshire Farmland
LDU Reference: 254,255
DPZ Reference: SN01
• Distinctive escarpment bordering the River Trent with a steep slope to the river and gentler slopes
down to alluvial farmland at Ruddington Moor
• Prominent Mercia Mudstone outcrop
• Open large scale field pattern of both modern origin with fragmented hedges Remnants of former field
boundaries in the form of undulations, tracks or areas left unploughed can be seen
• Clifton and Barton Moor are an area of land which was not subject to the enclosures act and has
remained open in character since the Sanderson’s Map from 1835
• A smaller scale pattern is present close to the urban fringe which is an older enclosure pattern
reflecting former open systems and semi-regular and regular geometric enclosure identified from the
historic landscape characterisation
• Pocket of pasture present close to the urban edge of Clifton
• A distinctive narrow wooded lane to Barton in Fabis although other routes are mostly open with long
distance views
• Much of the urban fringe is nestled and obscured by boundary vegetation and landform although new
retirement apartment development is a prominent feature on high ground bordering open farmland
• Regular dispersal of prominent geometric blocks of broadleaved woodland, its prominence is
heightened by the lack of vertical features within farmland
• Prominent linear wooded bluff on steepest sloping land adjacent to River Trent is a distinctive feature
• Combination of linear woodland on slopes and a few geometric blocks of woodland creates a strong
sense of enclosure along Clifton urban fringe
• Almost no hedgerows or hedgerow trees within the landscape, around pastoral fields close to the
urban fringe hedgerow trees and hedgerows are more common creating a degree of enclosure
• Built form limited to a few large farms with brick farmsteads and a couple of modern farm buildings
• Extensive and distinctive views from A453 through the area with wooded blocks and extensive views
across the flat farmland to the ridgelines and hills beyond. It creates a distinctive route into
Nottingham
• Mast in the form of a false conifer tree is locally prominent on the approach into Nottingham
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
A wide expansive sloping escarpment. The land is mostly under
arable cultivation with few field boundary features. Around the
urban fringe the land is mostly pasture and frequent woodland
creates a stronger sense of enclosure.
Land use is almost entirely arable farming, which where present is

extensive; large fields with no field boundary vegetation create an
expansive and open landscape. This is both of modern origin and
includes land which has never been enclosed. Some scrub is
establishing on margins close to Barton in Fabis and along the edge
of Clifton at Fox Covert Lane which is more enclosed and intimate
in character.
Woodland comprises geometric blocks of woodland whose

prominence is increased by the lack of hedgerow trees or other
features within farmland. Other woodland includes a cluster of
woodland blocks at Clifton and a mature wooded bluff on the
steepest escarpment slopes. This woodland is a prominent feature
along the River Trent and from Barton in Fabis.
The landscape condition is MODERATE. There are few boundary

features and a strong evidence of decline and fragmentation of
woodland edges (particularly close to arable fields) and remaining
hedgerow boundaries. Pockets of land still retain a historic
connection having never been enclosed such as Clifton Pasture and
Barton Moor.
Landscape Strength
Views within this DPZ are a mix of open expansive views across
Ruddington Moor to the ridgelines of the Leicestershire Wolds and
more enclosed views close to the edge of Clifton where there is a
concentration of woodland. The area is visible as sloping land with
woodland on the highest land from the wider landscape to the
south with traffic along the A543 often prominent. The woodland
on the escarpment forms a distinctive backdrop to views along the
River Trent and from within and adjacent to Barton in Fabis.
The character of the area is MODERATE. This is a distinctive

escarpment however it has a number of different land uses
particularly close to the urban fringe. The overall landscape strategy is ENHANCE.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Seek to restore hedgerow boundaries and hedgerow trees in arable fields where they no longer exist
• Conserve existing hedgerow trees and hedgerows which are important landscape features
• Conserve the prominent woodland blocks on higher ground and encourage new woodland planting particularly
along urban edges
• Conserve the intact long linear wooded bluffs along the steepest slopes adjacent to the River Trent
• Conserve, where possible, the open unenclosed character of Clifton Pasture and Barton Moor
Built form
• Enhance the nestled and screened urban edges and ensure new development does not increase the prominence of
built form within the landscape
• Enhance urban fringes and prominent development through localised geometric woodland planting to soften their
appearance within the landscape.
• Conserve the open and distinctive views from A453 across farmland on the approach into Nottingham
• Conserve the narrow sloping wooded character of New Road into Barton in Fabis
SN02 Ruddington Alluvial Farmland
CONTEXT
Nottinghamshire Farmlands
LDU reference: 266
DPZ Reference: SN02
• Large expanse of flat alluvial land characterised by arable farming
• Low-lying alluvial land subject to waterlogging
• Frequent streams such as Fairham Brook, drainage ditches and dykes often with engineered uniform
banks. Ditches are mostly in straight lines and form field boundaries
• Rural farming character although there are frequent urban elements such as urban fringe at Clifton and
large villages visible within the landscape
• Large-scale arable farming with large sometimes expansive monotonous modern field patterns
• Most field patterns are of modern origin although there are older patterns close to Barton Moor which
are semi-regular and irregular geometric patterns
• There is a small amount of pasture used as horse present close to village fringes such as the edge of
Bunny
• Infrequent woodland, where present, tends to be small geometric plantations or coverts along
streams, the railway or around village and farm fringes. Where present woodland is prominent.
• Close to Bunny there are frequent ash, willow and poplar trees close to farmsteads and along
hedgerow field boundaries
• Field boundaries are either drainage ditches, dykes or hedgerows which are generally fragmented or
the remnants of former field patterns
• There is limited built form is in the DPZ comprising a few farmsteads which are large in size
• Nucleated villages such as Gotham, Bunny and Bradmore are on the fringes of the DPZ on higher
ground. These are characterised by older distinctive cores, prominent church spires and scrub along
their fringes
• Bunny contains a cluster of distinctive red brick buildings such as Bunny Hall, the Old Vicarage, Ivy
Cottage, the Rancliffe Arms public house, the Post Office and the former Schoolhouse within its
centre all designed by the same architect Sir Thomas Parkyns which creates a uniform and distinctive
character
• Red brick and red pantile roofs are common building materials
• Inaccessible character with few tracks or roads through the character area
• Lanes and roads within the area are often bordered by drainage ditches and rough grassland which
emphasises the expansive and open character
• There are open expansive views across the character area due to the general lack of trees, built form
and infrequent hedgerows to filter views
• Views are enclosed by a series of hills to the west at Gotham and West Leake, south at Bunny and
north at Sharphill Wood and Mickleborough Hill
• Overhead lines are prominent vertical features within the landscape
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
A wide expansive open and low-lying landscape. The land is mostly
under arable cultivation with fields bounded by drainage ditches and
fragmented hedgerows. Infrequent built form which comprises large
farms and nucleated villages are on the fringes of the area.
Land use is almost entirely extensive arable farming. Field

boundaries are formed by ditches which often give the impression
of wide expansive and continuous fields. Mostly a modern field
pattern with pockets of older enclosure close to Barton Moor.
Woodland is relatively infrequent with small geometric plantations,

riparian woodland along streams and some hedgerow trees. There
are copses of scrub and woodland along village fringes. Lombardy
poplar used for screening urban fringes and farmsteads is
particularly prominent within the DPZ.
The landscape condition is POOR. The agricultural landscape

shows evidence of removal of hedgerows for field expansion
resulting in expansive fields with few features. Where hedgerows
are present they are often fragmented.
Landscape Strength
The land is enclosed on all sides by hills and scarps which limit the
extent of views of the area. There are open expansive views from
adjacent high ground and open views within the DPZ due to a
general lack of trees or woodland. The most prominent and
distinctive views are from the A453 across the farmland to the hills
beyond at Bunny.
The character strength of the area is MODERATE. The expansive

farmland is the main characteristic of the area. Other landscape
features are less apparent and the pattern and distribution of
features often varies around village fringes where the land becomes
more enclosed. Urban features are apparent and noticeable in the The overall landscape strategy is ENHANCE
landscape. The landscape pattern shows evidence of hedgerow loss AND RESTORE.
and fragmentation which weakens the character.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Enhance field boundaries through the replacement/infilling of fragmented hedgerows and planting of riparian
vegetation along ditches and streams
• Enhance the condition of existing hedgerows through planting with appropriate native species and possibly re-
laying to improve their density and appearance
• Conserve and enhance the field pattern, particularly where evidence of older semi-regular and irregular geometric
field patterns remains
• Enhance the pattern of woodland to provide interest and break up the expansive and monotonous character of the
landscape through small-scale planting around farms, the railway and streams
• Conserve and enhance the pattern of hedgerow trees where present and ensure a programme of replacement for
older trees
• Conserve and maintain pockets of pasture which are a remnant of the land’s former use for livestock and
haymaking until the land could be cultivated to arable
• Recreate areas of low-lying wet pasture, moor and fen where possible along lower-lying parts of the DPZ close to
watercourses
• Conserve expansive views across the area contained by wooded ridgelines and hills by carefully siting of planting
and any new development
• Enhance the continuity of Fairham Brook through planting of small-scale groups of riparian trees and scrub to
denote its position within the landscape
Built form
• Conserve the impression of a lack of built form within the DPZ ensuring any new development is close to village
fringes and does not make built form more prominent within the landscape
• Conserve the impression of villages on slightly higher ground than the low-lying farmland
• Enhance village fringes through localised woodland copse and scrub planting to soften their appearance within the
landscape
• Conserve the distinctive core within Bunny and ensure any new development or change reflects this character and
uses appropriate materials such as red brick
• Conserve and enhance the infrequent small tracks and lanes within the DPZ and the general absence of more major
roads to maintain a sense of seclusion and remote character
SN03 Mickleborough Fringe
CONTEXT
Nottinghamshire Farmland
LDU Reference: 423,424
DPZ Reference: SN03
• Two distinctive hills on the southern fringe of Nottingham which are prominent above the surrounding
gently undulating farmland
• Narrow cutting of former railway with steep sided wooded embankments
• Wooded streams have a localised influence on the area; denoted mostly by the change in landform
• Marginal rural character with frequent views across the lower-lying fringes of Nottingham
• Land use is mostly arable with large to extensive field pattern around Sharphill Wood with trees a
remnant of a former field pattern
• Field patterns to the north of Ruddington are slightly smaller and narrower; all field patterns are of
modern origin with a single field of older irregular geometric enclosure pattern
• Field boundaries where present are mostly hedgerows; these are of variable condition and height
• Sharphill Wood is a prominent woodland and is a managed local nature reserve. It shows evidence of
regular use by local residents
• Other woodland is present around Wilford Hill Cemetery, Mickleborough Hill and as linear belts and
strips within two golf courses and the former railway cutting
• Avenues of trees are present on approaches to larger properties and to the golf lodges
• One stream is within the area and is characterised by mature woodland along its fringes
• The area contains mostly large detached properties set within mature gardens; these are generally of
modern styles and use a variety of buildings materials
• A Garden Centre and small industrial park contribute to an urban fringe character to the landscape
• Built form adjacent to the area in West Bridgford is largely red brick modern suburban homes set on
gently sloping land; the housing and roofline are relatively uniform
• Ruddington is a large village on the fringe of the DPZ, characterised by large and small red brick
properties set around a network of small roads and a village green. The village contains a number of
the Grade II Listed Buildings, which were former framework knitters’ workshops, provide a distinctive
character to the village
• Busy dual carriageways bordered by embankments with young woodland planting; busy roundabout
junctions and traffic are a feature of the DPZ
• Extensive views are possible from higher ground across gently undulating farmland to the ridgeline at
West Leake Hill, Gotham Hill and Bunny Hill
• Extensive views north across Nottingham City with the castle, St Mary’s Church, Wollaton Hall and
County Hall prominent features within the city. The two football grounds, Trent Bridge and Colwick
Woods are also prominent
• The land forms a small buffer between West Bridgford and Ruddington
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
This DPZ has a rural/urban fringe character with extensive views
over the surburban edge of Nottingham; The two hills are prominent
distinctive features and woodland on higher ground is also a
feature.
The land use is varied and reflects its proximity to the urban edge;
there are two golf courses, Wilford Hill Cemetery, a small cutting
(former railway) and large to extensive arable fields. Hedgerow
boundaries are of variable height and condition and contain few
hedgerow trees.
Woodland is limited within the DPZ but is in prominent locations on

the highest ground on the hills and along the fringes of the
cemetery and golf courses. Wooded belts along the roads help to
contribute to the impression of a reasonably well wooded
landscape.
The condition of this landscape is considered to be MODERATE.

Many of the features show signs of decline or fragmentation such
as loss of field pattern and fragmentation of hedgerows. However
woodlands are managed.
Landscape Strength
This area contains two distinctive hills which obscure the urban
edge of West Bridgford from the wider countryside. They also form
a prominent wooded backdrop to views to the south. There are
extensive views from high ground across Nottingham and across
the countryside to the south. Nearly all views from the DPZ contain
built form which is a reminder of the close proximity to West
Bridgford.
The character strength of the area is WEAK. Whilst the hills are
distinctive features, other features are less distinctive with varied
urban uses and pressures exerting a strong influence on the
character. Small changes in land use could have a significant effect The overall landscape strategy is ENHANCE
on landscape character. AND RESTORE
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Enhance the open and distinctive views from high ground across farmland to the south and Nottingham City to the
north
• Seek to restore hedgerow boundaries and hedgerow trees in arable fields where boundaries no longer exist
• Conserve and enhance existing hedgerow trees and hedgerows which are important landscape features
• Conserve and enhance the prominent woodland blocks on higher ground
• Enhance the naturalistic character of routes through woodland
Built form
• Where possible create new woodland copses along urban fringes to reduce their prominence in the landscape
• Conserve the strong transition from urban to rural landscape and ensure new development does not increase the
prominence of development within the wider landscape to the south beyond Sharphill and Mickleborough Hill
• Enhance the fringes of prominent development through localised woodland planting to soften their appearance
within the landscape and ensure they appear as single or small groups of properties.
• Enhance the boundaries around the garden centre and industrial buildings through new woodland planting;
development which appears as single large dwellings or farms could help reduce the scale of this area
• Maintain a buffer between West Bridgford and Ruddington to preserve the sense of separation between the two
settlements
• Conserve the distinctive village character within the centre of Ruddington
• Conserve the open and extensive views from roads within the area
• Reduce the prominence of roads and junctions within the area through augmentations of woodland and hedgerow
planting
• Enhance and create street tree planting along roads and at junctions to soften and ‘green’ their appearance
SN04 Cotgrave And Tollerton Village Farmlands
CONTEXT
LDU Reference:395,421,426
DPZ Reference:SN04
• Gently undulating landform with localised steeper areas around watercourses at Upper Saxondale and
localised plateaus
• Man-made hill formed from former mining operations is prominent around Cotgrave
softer mudstones and clays;
• Frequent watercourses which are often demarcated by landform and small amounts of riparian
vegetation such as willows and scrub. Where trees are not alongside, watercourses are generally not
visible in the landscape
• Disused Grantham Canal is a local wooded feature in the landscape, with a mix of riparian trees,
reeds, wetlands and open water
• Rural character present across the area although there are frequent urbanising elements providing a
reminder of the proximity of built form such as large villages, Nottingham, industry and large farm
buildings
• Land use is mostly arable although pasture is common around village fringes and along watercourses
• Fields are mostly medium to large in size and pattern includes predominantly modern field patterns.
Older enclosure is present around village fringes particularly around Tollerton and larger tracts of fields
reflecting open systems and semi-regular enclosure to the south of Radcliffe on Trent
• Field boundaries are almost all hedgerows which are of variable condition, along roads they are almost
always intact but within fields there is evidence of fragmentation. Along A46 hedgerows have been
removed to enable road widening
• Scrub and rough grassland is present around field margins particularly close to West Bridgford
• There is a relatively low level of woodland cover; concentrations around Ruddington Country Park,
Cotgrave Country Park, golf courses, settlements and watercourses creates the impression of higher
woodland cover than actually exists
• Areas of restored land, now country parks, are characterised by young structure planting, areas of
open water and wetlands, grassland and natural regeneration
• Few hedgerow trees which tend to be present as small clusters along field boundaries and along roads
• Frequent large nucleated commuter settlements such as Bingham, Radcliffe on Trent, Ruddington and
Cotgrave and smaller nucleated settlements at Plumtree, Normanton on the Wolds and Tollerton.
• Long distance views towards the centre of Nottingham possible across farmland and from high ground
at Cotgrave Colliery
• Urban edges of West Bridgford are locally visible above a narrow belt of woodland along Gamston
Lings Bar Road
• Smaller villages often have belts of woodland along their fringes; woodland along the railway limits
views of Plumtree.
• Small areas of parkland to the north east of Tollerton and at Ruddington Hall; wooded boundaries
reduce their prominence in the landscape
• Rising roofline present within smaller villages with prominent church spires
• Older centres of villages are characterised by red brick and pantile roofs; modern buildings use a
variety of materials and are more uniform in layout, orientation and layouts are denser
• Large industrial buildings at the airfield and large agricultural buildings are prominent within the
landscape
• Frequent overhead line routes are prominent within the landscape
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
This area is characterised by very gently undulating landform with
contrasting areas of restored land. Large villages and farmsteads are
frequent within a predominantly arable landscape which has a
uniform character.

mostly of modern origin. Patterns of older enclosure remain close to
village fringes and to the south of Bingham where fields are smaller
and of irregular and semi-regular shape.
The area has a low level of woodland cover. Woodland blocks are
concentrated around restored land forming country parks and is
relatively immature. As it matures woodland cover in the landscape
will increase. Other woodland includes a linear belt along the
railway and disused canal, riparian belts along watercourses and
around parkland to the north east of Tollerton. Scattered hedgerow
trees also contribute to woodland cover.
The landscape condition is MODERATE. There is evidence of

hedgerow fragmentation and in areas scrub encroachment and
rough grassland due to a lack of management. In other areas land is
well managed.
Landscape Strength
Views are often over quite long distances due to the undulating
landform and low woodland cover. Views always contain urban
features such as industry and large villages with modern fringes.
Farmsteads and large farm buildings are also common. Views into
the DPZ are from high ground such as Sharphill Wood and higher
land around Clipston.
The strength of character of the area is MODERATE. The area has a

relatively uniform character of arable fields with prominent village
fringes. Urban elements are frequent and exert a strong influence.
Man-made elements and landform have a localised influence on
character.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Conserve the older field patterns within the DPZ such as those reflecting open systems and the semi-regular
geometric patterns in the north
• Enhance field boundaries through planting of new hedgerows and hedgerow trees to reinforce field pattern
• Enhance the distribution of hedgerow trees by encouraging planting of trees within hedgerows. Species used
should be mostly ash with some oak.
• Conserve areas of permanent pasture around village fringes
and the more enclosed and wooded pasture fields around village fringes
• Conserve and enhance roadside hedgerows through replanting and planting new hedgerow trees such as ash or
oak
• Enhance woodland cover within the DPZ ensuring where implemented it is small copses, reflects surrounding field
patterns and does not block longer distance views
• Conserve and enhance the wetland fringes of the former Grantham Canal
Built form
• Enhance village fringes through planting small linear belts and copses to break up the uniform nature of the urban
edge particularly along the fringes of larger commuter settlements such as Ratcliffe on Soar and Bingham
• Conserve the older cores of villages with red brick and pantile roofed vernacular buildings
• Conserve the prominence of churches within village skylines
• Any developments along village fringes should encourage the use of red brick and pantile roofs and make a positive
contribution to local character and distinctiveness within each individual village
• Conserve the tree cover and pasture which softens the appearance of smaller villages in the landscape
• Development along village fringes should aim to provide a dispersed character rather than a sharp line and
incorporate smaller fields or open spaces, woodlands and trees along roads Other development/ structures in the
landscape
• Retain and enhance hedgerow boundaries and hedgerow tree boundaries along roads through the area
• Conserve small ditches and narrow grass verges along roads through the DPZ
SN05 East Bridgford Escarpment Farmlands
CONTEXT
LDU Reference: 421
DPZ Reference: SN05
• Escarpment with a steeply sloping northern edge down to the Trent Washlands and more gentle slope
to the south to the A46 forming a broad plateau either side of Kneeton Road
• Rural character with a sense of enclosure created on high ground through limited views beyond the
plateau to adjacent lower ground; on the slopes views towards the A46 and Nottingham City Centre
provide an urbanising influence
• Land use is almost totally arable although individual fields of pasture are present around the edge of
East Bridgford and Kneeton
• Fields are mostly medium to large in size and enclosure pattern includes modern field patterns to the
south and around Syerston Airfield with older enclosure present at East Bridgford and Kneeton
• Field boundaries are almost all hedgerows which are of variable condition; along roads they are almost
always intact and over 1.5m in height but within fields there is evidence of fragmentation particularly
around arable fields
• There is very little woodland cover and where present it is prominent in the landscape. Woodland is
generally irregular shaped blocks often with smaller fields planted with woodland. The largest wood is
to the south of Syerston Airfield
• Clumps of woodland are present around village fringes which help to reduce their prominence in the
landscape although the rising roofline of Radcliffe on Trent remains locally visible in the landscape,
other tree groups are present around farmsteads
• There are few hedgerow trees and where present are often in small groups along field boundaries,
often close to woodlands
• There are few settlements; the largest is Radcliffe on Trent which is on the gentle slopes of the
escarpment. East Bridgford and smaller Kneeton are nestled into the landscape often with mature
boudanries helping to reduce their prominence
• Smaller villages are characterised by small terraces and cottages of red brick with pantile roofs,
individual working and converted former farms. The variety in orientation of buildings along streets
provides distinction and interest. East Bridgford is also characterised by a prominent red brick wall
along Kirk Hill which adds an element of formality on the approach to the village
• Farmsteads include both old and new properties, mostly constructed from red brick. A converted mill
is a distinctive feature visible on the skyline
• An area of housing at Newton is a large isolated area of more modern housing constructed from red
and brown brick. It is locally prominent in views from the A46. However elsewhere only glimpsed
views of the larger buildings are possible
• Extensive and distinctive views are possible across low-lying farmland along the River Trent and to the
village of Shelford from Shelford Road
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
This area is characterised by broad escarpment with a steeply
sloping northern edge and more gently sloping southern edge. The
landuse is fairly uniform and mostly arable fields with a few
prominent woodlands. Village fringes are visible at Radcliffe on Soar
and partially at Newton although mostly built form is obscured
within the landscape.

mostly of modern origin with older enclosure present around East
Bridgford and Kneeton. Fields are bounded by hedgerows which are
taller along roads and often fragmented between fields.
The area has a low level of woodland cover, individual woodland

blocks where present are prominent within the landscape. There are
few hedgerow trees which are often concentrated around village
fringes and close to woodlands. Woodland at Syerston Airfield is
the most prominent within the DPZ.

hedgerow fragmentation and a loss of field boundaries to enable
arable expansion.
Landscape Strength
Views are generally enclosed and restricted to within the DPZ when
on higher ground. Longer views are possible across the edge of
Radcliffe On Trent to the west and distinctive views across the
Trent Washlands to the north along Shelford Road. The land is only
locally visible from the surrounding countryside with the steeply
sloping land a prominent feature in views from the Trent Washlands
and from higher ground to the north around Burton Joyce. There are
also views across the area from the A46.
The character of the area is MODERATE. The area has a relatively

uniform character of arable fields with prominent village fringes.
Views to urban elements are frequent and exert an influence on the
area. There are local variations in the pattern of the landscape
around the airfield to the north and where the landform changes to
the south close to Radcliffe on Trent.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Conserve the older field patterns within the DPZ around East Bridgford and Kneeton ensuring that fields are not
expanded for more intensive farming
• Enhance field boundaries through augmentation of hedgerows to reinforce field pattern
should be mostly ash with some oak. These should be carefully located to ensure that an open character is
retained
• Conserve the small pockets of permanent pasture around village fringes
• Enhance woodland cover within the DPZ ensuring where implemented it is small in size and reflects surrounding
field patterns and the character of small infrequent prominent woodlands
• Conserve and enhance opportunities for distinctive views across the Trent Washlands from adjacent roads on
higher ground through careful management of hedgerows and woodlands to retain views
Built form
• Enhance village fringes through planting small copses to break up the uniform nature of the urban edge particularly
along the fringes of larger commuter settlements such as Radcliife on Trent and Newton
• Conserve the older cores of villages with red brick and pantile roofed vernacular buildings
• Conserve the narrow character of roads through East Bridgford and the distinctive walled approach along Kirk Hill.
• Conserve the variety of built form and orientation of buildings along roads within villages
• Conserve the small scale character of Kneeton and retain the connection to farming through retaining the presence
of working farms
• Development along village fringes should aim to provide a dispersed character rather than a sharp continuous built
line and incorporate smaller fields or open spaces, to provide a dispersed appearance to village fringes
• Retain and enhance hedgerow boundaries and hedgerow tree boundaries along roads through the area
• Conserve the small rural character of roads through the area
• Enhance the landscape through planting of small copses and hedgerows and hedgerow trees along the A46 to
reduce its prominence.
SN06 Aslockton Village Farmlands
CONTEXT
LDU Reference: 83, 84, 85, 134, 135, 151, 406,
407, 421
DPZ Reference: SN06
• Series of Mercia Mudstone outcrops and thin bands of lower-lying alluvial levels following rivers. The
outcrops vary between 5 and 10m above adjacent levels; the most prominent being along Sutton Lane
and Barnstone Lane in the south east of the area
• A number of watercourses such as the River Smite and Devon flow through the landscape; they are
lower than surrounding ground with arable fields extending to their banks and little riparian vegetation.
Therefore they are not easily discernible in the landscape
• Rural remote and tranquil character comprising arable farmlands and a regular dispersal of small rural
settlements
• Land use is mostly arable although pasture is common around village fringes. Larger tracts are present
where villages are situated close to each other and pasture extends between; these tend to have a
slightly more enclosed and intimate character
• Field pattern ranges from small-scale fields around village fringes to expansive large scale fields in
open countryside
• Field boundaries are almost all hedgerows which are of variable condition; they tend to be more intact
around pasture fields where left to grow taller whereas in adjacent arable fields are often low and in
places quite fragmented
• There is a relatively low level of woodland cover with a regular pattern of small geometric and
irregular shaped woodlands throughout; other woodland is often linear in character following the line
of a former railway, around village fringes and where individual hedgerows are left to mature
• Hedgerow trees are infrequent although clustered around pasture fields on village margins and within
villages. Where hedgerows are often taller around arable fields trees tend to be less frequent. There
are lots of young hedgerow trees planted as avenues along small lanes which will increase tree cover
as they mature. These are mostly ash and horse chestnut
• The combination of taller hedgerows, hedgerow trees and scattered woodlands creates a dispersed
wooded character and woodland is often a key component within skyline views
• Small parklands at Flintham, Langar, Whatton and Wiverton Hall are local wooded features
• Dispersed small rural settlements include both linear and nucleated patterns; they are often situated on
the slightly higher Mercia Mudstone outcrops. Bingham is the only large commuter settlement within
the DPZ and its northern and eastern edges are locally prominent in the landscape
• Villages of Elton on the Hill, Granby, Sutton and Barnstone are prominent on higher ground; they are
seen mostly as a single line of dispersed housing set within trees
• Rooflines of villages are generally obscured by mature trees; where visible they appear dispersed and
as individual or small groups of properties. Church towers and spires are prominent above the villages
and are distinctive features within the landscape
• Villages are particularly distinctive often containing very little modern development; they are along
narrow roads often bordered by red brick walls. All villages are well wooded with many mature trees
along roads within small fields and open spaces within the villages and around their fringes
• Buildings within villages include small cottages and terraces and larger individual properties both set
behind small and larger front gardens. Almost all are constructed of red brick with red pantile roofs
although there is the occasional rendered or painted house. Villages often contain a few former farm
buildings which are now converted to private residences.
• Churches within villages are almost all constructed from local stone and are either towers or spires
and always set within mature grounds
• Narrow winding lanes are common throughout the landscape although a few straighter roads across
lower lying land are present around Orston and Granby. Roads are characterised by often large verges
or pockets of grassland. In these places traditional gypsy caravans and horses grazing are sometimes
present
• Scattered farmsteads, often constructed of red brick with small out buildings and barns are
throughout the DPZ although not present on the lowest lying ground
• Pockets of rough grassland and village greens grazed by cattle are a feature of villages in the northern
part of the area such as between Car Colston and Screveton
• Many prominent overhead line routes are present within the landscape and are always visible on the
skyline
• Expansive long distance views across the landscape to the Belvoir Ridge to the south in Leicestershire
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
This area is characterised by very gently undulating landform which
is a series of Mercia Mudstone outcrops and narrow alluvial levels.
The land is mostly arable farming with pockets of pasture which are
more intimate in character close to village fringes. There is a
regularly dispersed pattern of small distinctive rural villages. The
landscape has a strong rural tranquil character which feels remote
from urban centres.
Fields are a mixture of medium to large scale which are mostly

modern enclosure with some larger areas of older enclosure present
around villages. Fields around Car Colston and Orston display
patterns which are some of the oldest enclosures in
Nottinghamshire.
The area has a low level of woodland cover; small coverts and
copses are scattered throughout the landscape. Other woodland
cover includes clumps and avenues along roads and parkland and
linear belts along maturing hedgerows and disused railways. These
combine to give a wooded impression in views.
The landscape condition is MODERATE. There is evidence of some

fragmentation of features through the area such as loss of
hedgerows. However there is also evidence of replanting of
hedgerow trees along many of the small rural roads.
Landscape Strength
Views are often over quite long distances due to the very gently
undulating landform and low woodland cover. Views are rural in
character across arable fields interspersed with linear tree belts and
clusters of woodland at village fringes. Frequent church spires are
notable features. Overhead lines are prominent vertical features
within the landscape. Views to the south are to the Belvoir Ridge
and on the southern fringes at the start of the Leicestershire Wolds.
Views across the DPZ from outside the area are possible from
surrounding high ground and along the A46.

relatively uniform character of arable fields, linear blocks and
clumps of woodland and small distinctive rural villages. There are AND ENHANCE.
pockets of the landscape where there are greater or lesser levels of
enclosure however these are broadly consistent across the DPZ.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Conserve the older field patterns within the DPZ such as those reflecting open systems and the semi-regular
geometric patterns in the north particularly enclosure patterns around Car Colston and Screveton
• Enhance field boundaries through planting of new hedgerows and hedgerow trees to reinforce field pattern
should be mostly ash with some horse chestnut along roads which currently have low numbers of hedgerow trees
• Conserve areas of permanent pasture and woodland clumps around village fringes
and the slightly more enclosed and wooded pasture fields around village fringes
• Enhance woodland cover within the DPZ ensuring where implemented it is small in size and reflect surrounding
field patterns and contributes to the regular dispersal of woodland within views. Planting should be focussed on
the more open areas to help integrate them with the more intimate pastoral landscapes close to village fringes
• Conserve the distinctive character of open grazing land at Car Colston
• Conserve and enhance areas of parkland through ensuring replacement of specimen trees and retention of land as
informal grazing
• Enhance the character of rivers through the DPZ through small scale planting of clumps of riparian woodland
Built form
• Enhance the village fringe of Bingham through planting small linear belts and copses to break up the uniform nature
of the urban edge to integrate with the dispersed character of other village fringes
• Conserve the consistent distinctive character of small villages throughout the area; any infill or alterations to
buildings should make a positive contribution to local distinctiveness
• Conserve the prominence of churches within village skylines
• Conserve the appearance of dispersed linear settlements on higher ground
• Conserve the tree cover and pockets of pasture, fields and small open spaces within villages
• Conserve the narrow street pattern and variation of building orientation within villages
• Any new development along village fringes should aim to provide a dispersed character rather than a sharp line and
incorporate smaller fields or open spaces, woodlands and trees along roads to provide a dispersed appearance to
village fringes
• Conserve the wide grass verges and pockets of grassland along the small roads within the DPZ
• Retain the remote rural character of rural roads ensuring that any highway upgrades for safety do not affect the
rural character
TRENT AND SOAR VALLEY
TSV01 Attenborough Wetlands

TSV02 Soar Valley
Key Characteristics
• This regional area follows the broad valley of the River Soar to its
confluence with the River Trent;
• It is defined by alluvial and river terrace drift deposits formed through
deposition of a series of river-borne materials during the development of
the river mostly gravels with more recent alluvium;
• The valleys have been formed through the river cutting into the Mercia
Mudstone and are bordered by rising ground to the east and west of the
River Soar and to the south. Rising land is less notable to the north of the
River Trent;
• Both rivers are within broad valleys bordered by narrow river terraces; the
most extensive vale is at the confluence of the two rivers extending to 6
kilometres wide;
• Alluvial soils comprise mottled clayey and clay loam soils developed in
greyish and brownish alluvium;
• Meandering river corridors are the most distinctive feature;
• Settlement within the region has developed adjacent to the alluvium
ground;
• Settlements include larger conurbations such as Clifton; Beeston; fringes
of Loughborough; expanded commuter settlements such as Kegworth and
small nucleated settlements such as Kingston on Soar and Normanton on
Soar;
• Smaller villages and farmsteads have a distinctive character of red brick
and pantile roofs;
• Land influenced by gravel extraction, industry such as Ratcliffe on Soar
Power Station, urban expansion, roads and railways and overhead lines;
• Arable farmland is predominant particularly along the River Trent; along
the Soar the farming is more mixed with areas of historic permanent
pasture;
• Pockets of riverside pasture, alluvial meadows, reed beds, flood meadows
and marsh, grassland and willow holts;
• Generally low woodland cover, although a perceived sense of woodland is
created through the combination of regular riparian trees, hedgerow trees
and isolated woodlands;
• Wooded enclosure tends to be greater within pastoral land along the River
Soar with more open exposed land present adjacent to the River Trent
where the land is under arable farming;
• Steep-sided wooded bluffs at Clifton are prominent features adjacent to
the low-lying river corridor;
• Mature willows are distinctive features of the landscape;
• Large areas of wetlands and lakes formed as restoration of gravel
workings. These are now used for recreation and nature conservation;
• Naturally regenerating and planted woodlands provide a strong sense of
enclosure around restored workings; and
• Prominent man-made flood defence embankments are a marked contrast
to the low lying landform.
• Conserve and restore the traditional pattern of hedged fields;

• Promote measures for strengthening the existing level of tree cover within
arable land through increasing hedgerow trees and small woodlands at field
margins;
• Strengthen the continuity and ecological diversity of stream corridors
through retention and enhancement of riparian vegetation;
• Conserve pastoral character and promote measures for enhancing the
ecological diversity of alluvial grassland;
• Enhance visual unity through appropriate small scale woodland planting;
• Conserve and enhance the long curvilinear pattern of hedgerows;
• Conserve and strengthen the simple unity and sparsely settled character of
the landscape through maintaining a sense of separation from the urban
fringes;
• Conserve and strengthen the simple unity and spacious character of the
landscape through maintaining the balance between arable fields bordered
by ditches and pastoral fields bordered by hedgerows;
• Identify opportunities for enhancing the overall wetland character of the
landscape;
• Conserve areas of historic parkland and seek opportunities for restoring
pastoral character;
• Conserve and strengthen the well-wooded character of the landscape; and
• Seek to ensure that the reclamation of gravel workings restores land to
wetland habitats such as reed beds, marshland and wet meadows rather
than open water.
TSV01 Attenborough Wetlands
CONTEXT
Regional Character Area: Trent Valley
LDU Reference: 263 & 276
DPZ Reference: TSV01
• Broad low lying river corridor enclosed by steep sided wooded ridges with an underlying geology of
Mercia Mudstone
• Range of river valley wetlands at different stages of maturity created from restoration of former sand
and gravel extraction sites including large expanses of open water, reed beds and riverside pasture.
Now used for recreation and nature conservation purposes
• Continuing mineral extraction is apparent adjacent to Attenborough Nature Reserve; the land is heavily
influenced by mineral extraction
• The meandering navigable river channel of the Trent forms a distinctive feature
• Urban fringe character is evident to the north of the area due to the influence of urbanising features
such as railway lines, roads, industrial and commercial development, sewage treatment works and
encroaching residential development. South of the River Trent the character is more rural
• Farmland is predominantly large arable fields bounded by fragmented hedgerows and some ditches
• Areas of former workings restored to agriculture using pulverised fuel ash. Hedgerows and woodland
within these areas is limited
• Small pasture fields of sheep and horse grazing are present on settlement fringes
• Areas of scrub woodland dominated by willow, hawthorn and blackthorn are present along the river
corridor
• Larger areas of young to semi-mature native woodland associated with restoration of former mineral
workings such as Attenborough. Pockets of riverside pasture, alluvial meadows, flood meadows,
marsh and grassland are also present close to the river
• The historic settlement core is predominantly large red brick traditional properties with pantile roofs,
small cottages and stone churches. Within Attenborough modern urban expansion is apparent along
roads and urban fringes
• Large blocks of semi-mature to mature deciduous woodland on surrounding ridge lines enclose views
however, longer views can be seen across the large expanses of open water. Views to urban
features are also apparent including Ratcliffe on Soar Power Station, Attenborough village church and
St George’s Church in Barton in Fabis
• Areas of arable farmland have a open exposed character with few features
• Man made flood defence embankments provide a contrast to the low lying fluvial floodplain with steep
sided banks and no vegetation cover
• Areas restored to wetland are criss-crossed by a wide network of recreational routes which are
popular with visitors. Associated visitor infrastructure including car parking and visitor centres are
also provided within several locations
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
The landscape is a low lying flat fluvial floodplain with views
enclosed by woodland ridges. Large expanses of open water
associated with the restoration of former mineral workings are a
feature. Views to features including Ratcliffe on Soar Power
Station, overhead lines and industry have an urbanising influence.
Urban areas are characterised by an historic core with subsequent
modern expansion in some locations e.g. Attenborough.
Land use comprises a mix of agricultural landscapes and

recreational facilities. Agriculture is predominantly medium to large
arable fields bounded by linear fragmented hedgerows and some
ditches. Localised areas of pasture can be found adjacent to
villages such as Barton in Fabis where horse grazing is apparent
often enclosed by timber fences. The field pattern is mostly
modern although older enclosure is present north of Barton in Fabis
and west of Clifton. Areas of former mineral workings restored to
wetland are heavily used for recreational purposes and are covered
by an extensive network of footpaths.
The landscape appears well wooded due to views to wooded

ridges, linear woodland bordering the river channel and field
hedgerows. Restoration of former mineral workings has typically
incorporated large areas of new woodland planting and natural
regeneration to create young to semi-mature native deciduous
woodland habitats. Woodland species are characteristic of wetland
habitats. Arable land is still influenced by wooded ridgelines
although it is more open in character.
The landscape condition is MODERATE. Areas associated with

open water recreational landscapes are well managed due to visitor
demand. These wetland habitats are distinctive characteristics in
the landscape and provide a strong sense of place. However, areas
of agricultural landscape show evidence of deterioration with
fragmented hedgerows and few distinctive characteristics.
Landscape Strength
The wetland features and river valley corridors are distinctive in the
landscape. From the DPZ there are views to woodland ridges and
urban features such as the power station at Ratcliffe on Soar
apparent on the horizon. Ridges enclose views however longer
views are afforded from various locations over the larger expanses
of open water and across agricultural fields. Planted and
regenerating woodland around restored mineral workings provides a
strong sense of enclosure.
The DPZ has a MODERATE strength of character. The River Trent

and wetland habitats associated with former mineral workings
create a strong sense of place and are well managed. Urban
features are apparent however, they do not represent a significant
detraction and are generally well integrated into the landscape.
ENHANCE
Man-made flood defences are also prominent features. The
landscape pattern associated with the agricultural landscape shows
evidence of hedgerow loss and fragmentation and weakens the
strength of character.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Enhance valuable landscape habitats through ongoing management of both the landscape and visitor access
• Undertake sensitive restoration of areas of active mineral extraction, integrating new areas into the existing
landscape through native riparian tree planting, wetlands and areas of open water
• Enhance field boundaries by replanting gaps in hedgerows to retain and reinforce field patterns
• Restrict further expansion of agricultural field sizes to protect remaining hedgerow boundary features
• Conserve and enhance older field enclosure pattern close to Barton in Fabis through strengthening of hedgerow
boundaries
• Encourage planting of riparian vegetation and trees along ditches and streams within arable farming to increase the
sense of enclosure and provide greater integration with the river corridor and recreational restored land
Built form
• Conserve the character of settlements by restricting urban edge expansion of both residential, industrial and
commercial development
• Conserve and enhance the rural character through ensuring that development remains dispersed and well integrated
into the landscape
• Ensure that new development is in keeping with the local vernacular of red brick properties with pantile roofs and
reflects the styles and scale of built form within Barton in Fabis’ and Attenborough’s historic core
• Review the need for further flood defences and consider their impact on the landscape. Where required these
should be carefully sited and include some riparian planting to reduce their prominence
• Further mineral extraction should be screened from view by wooded boundaries to aid integration into the
landscape
TSV02 Soar Valley Farmlands
CONTEXT
Regional Character Area: Trent Valley
LDU reference: 269
DPZ Reference: TSV02
• Low-lying narrow floodplain bordering the River Soar
• Land rises on either side of the valley creating a strong sense of enclosure
• The River Soar is a prominent and distinctive feature within the DPZ. The river has a meandering
channel and gentle often grassed meadow banks and riparian tree planting
• Remote character created through a lack of built form. Woodland, scrub and hedgerow trees reduce
the scale and frequency of built form within views
• Urban fringe character in places conveyed by frequent views towards urban edges, the railway
embankment, horse paddocks and other fringe uses
• Land use is almost all pasture including rough grazing, rough grassland and horse paddocks. A very
small amount of arable is present close to the River Soar where the field pattern changes markedly
• Mostly an area with intact historic field enclosures. Most are semi-regular and reflect open field
systems which are some of the oldest enclosures in Nottinghamshire
• Fields are bounded mostly by hawthorn hedgerows which are often species-rich with frequent
hedgerow trees which are mostly ash
• Infrequent woodland, which where present tends to be clustered around village fringes as small
copses and linear belts along field boundaries
• Frequent clusters of hedgerow trees, mostly ash or willow, along the river, tracks and field boundaries
create a wooded impression
• Regular pockets of riparian vegetation along the fringes of the River Soar which become more frequent
and larger in extent where the land is pasture
• Very little built form on low ground; villages are on higher ground with woodland and mature trees
softening their appearance
• Church spires are prominent features of rooflines e.g. Church of St Michaels
• Built form includes distinctive ‘estate’ villages at Sutton Bonington and Kingston on Soar
• Built form at Sutton Bonington is set on high ground with a group of conifers on the highest land
around a prominent manor house
• Views are channelled along the river valley to higher ground on the valley fringes around Sutton
Bonington and Kegworth
• Urban elements become more frequent in views towards the north of the DPZ with Ratcliffe on Soar
power station and adjacent quarrying prominent
• Overhead lines form prominent vertical features across the landscape often following the line of the
river
• The railway is a prominent man-made element set on a raised embankment which provides a local
contrast to the surrounding flat land
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
This area is characterised by its association with the River Soar. It
is low-lying mostly pastoral farmland although where arable is
present it has an influence on the character. The DPZ is enclosed by
surrounding rising landform which in combination with frequent
hedgerow trees provides a strong sense of enclosure.
Land use is mostly pasture in small to medium sized fields. The HLC
identifies old patterns such as those reflecting open fields (one of
the earliest enclosures) around Sutton Bonington and a mix of
irregular and regular shaped fields which are evidence of slightly
later enclosure. Horse paddocks are a feature of village fringes with
associated fencing, jumps and sub-division of fields which in places
gives an untidy appearance.
Woodland is infrequent in the DPZ; small geometric copses and

mature linear belts of trees are present along tracks, village fringes
and field boundaries around pastoral fields. Hedgerows are generally
hawthorn although are more species-rich close to the river. Close to
the river, hedgerows are distinctive where they follow the
meandering course of the river rather than being in straight lines.

localised decline in hedgerows particularly where the land is under
arable cultivation. There are also frequent urban fringe uses such as
horse paddocks and sub-division of fields which create a slightly
untidy appearance to the landscape.
Landscape Strength
This is a relatively self contained area with channelled views
possible through the landscape along the river valley and views to
settlements within pockets of woodland and trees on higher ground.
There are very few views into the area from outside the DPZ due to
rising land on its fringes which screens the landscape.
The character strength of the area is MODERATE to STRONG. This

DPZ is characterised by low-lying land associated with the River
Soar floodplain. The land is mostly pastoral with change occurring
where the land is under arable cultivation and becomes more open
with fewer trees or hedgerows or along village fringes where horse
paddocks are common.
AND ENHANCE.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Conserve the older field patterns within the character area such as those reflecting open systems and the irregular
and regular geometric patterns
• Conserve areas of permanent pastoral farming along the river floodplain
• Conserve and enhance riparian and flood meadows along field fringes and the river margins by avoiding farming to
the river edges and maintenance of smaller rough grassland buffers
• Conserve and where possible enhance the continuity of riparian trees, meandering rivers and pasture along the river
• Enhance riparian trees through local replanting particularly in arable farming areas to improve unity with pastoral
areas
• Conserve river meadows where present along the riverbanks
• Enhance hedgerow boundaries and ensure replacement, particularly around arable fields where they tend to be less
intact
• Conserve and enhance the pattern of hedgerows and regular hedgerow trees along lanes and tracks
• Conserve and enhance channelled views through the DPZ through careful placement of any new vegetation or built
form
• Conserve the wooded impression of the DPZ through maintenance and planting of hedgerow and riparian trees
• Conserve the form of curvilinear hedgerows close to the river
Built form
• Conserve the infrequent nature of built form on lowest ground and the villages situated on rising higher ground
• Conserve the distinctive ‘estate’ character of Sutton Bonington and Kingston on Soar
• Ensure that any new or infill buildings respect the local built materials such as red brick, pantile roofs and red brick
boundary walls
• Conserve the linear nature of settlements within the DPZ
• Conserve the narrow character of roads and tracks through the area bordered by frequent hedgerow trees
TW PZ 1 – Gamston and Edwalton Meadowlands
PHOTOGRAPH CONTEXT
Eastern edge of the City of Nottingham
NCC Landscape Sub Type: River Meadowlands
Policy Zone: TW PZ 1
Land Cover Parcel TW1 and TW2
Condition
REINFORCE CONSERVE & CONSERVE
Good REINFORCE
CREATE & CONSERVE & CONSERVE &

Moderate REINFORCE CREATE RESTORE
CREATE RESTORE & RESTORE

Poor CREATE
CHARACTERISTIC VISUAL FEATURES Low Moderate High

• Flat and low lying land drained by ditches & a small watercourse Sensitivity
• Medium sized arable fields
• Small scale fields grazed by horses
• Remnant sections of the Grantham Canal
• Views of urban edge of Nottingham
• Golf course and other urban edge amenity land uses
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS

Landscape Condition Condition Moderate
This is a narrow swathe of land that lies either within or adjacent to the urban edge of Pattern of Elements: Coherent
Nottingham. It has a coherent pattern of elements with some detracting features
within the PZ such as post and wire fencing, makeshift pony shelters and a short low Detracting Features: Some
bridge section across the A52, which is a busy main road. Overall this gives a visually
coherent area. Visual Unity: Coherent
The Grantham Canal is no longer navigable having been severed by the A52. Lack of Ecological Integrity: Moderate
dredging and the maintenance of the associated canal structures, such as locks as fully
operational elements, have led to a loss of cultural integrity and the remaining features Cultural Integrity: Variable
are retained as relics as opposed to working structures.
Functional Integrity: Coherent
The canal corridor is well maintained as a recreational route and the canal itself is a
SINC site noted for its good aquatic plant community. The landscape along the canal
on the edge of Gamston and within the golf course is generally in good condition with
the established tree planting and with the maintained green open space appearing well
used. The ecological network is therefore described as moderate, which overall leads
to a coherent functional integrity / habitat for wildlife
A visually coherent area with coherent habitat for wildlife gives a moderate
landscape condition
Landscape Sensitivity Sensitivity Moderate
Some of the characteristic historic and ecological features of this Trent Washlands Distinctiveness: Characteristic
landscape are still in evidence, such as the meandering Grantham Canal and
associated wetland and marsh plant communities fringing the margins of the canal. Continuity: Historic
Part of the tow path along the line of the canal is now used as a footpath which
connects Edwalton to Gamston. These features give the area a moderate sense of Sense of Place: Moderate
place
Landform: Apparent
The proximity to the urban edge and more recent residential development has also led
to a more indistinct feel to this area. The degree of visibility is also moderate due to
Extent of Tree Cover Intermittent
containment by built edges and intermittent belts of tree planting, such as that around
the edges of the Edwalton Golf Course and the A52, and the gently undulating
Visibility: Moderate
landform. There are some views beyond the PZ from the fields within the northern area
to the wooded hills to the North.
A moderate sense of place with a moderate degree of visibility leads to a moderate

landscape sensitivity.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS - Conserve and Create
• Create new hedgerows along existing field boundaries particularly where these are currently post and wire fences.
• Conserve and enhance pattern of existing meadowland hedges, particularly primary hedgerows alongside roads, footpaths and bridleways.
• Enhance the appearance and visual unity of urban fringes and settlement edges with new tree and woodland planting to create filtered views.
• Conserve the canal side character and biodiversity of the Grantham canal and restore historical, visual and access links with the River Trent.
• Conserve pastoral character and promote measures for enhancing the ecological diversity of alluvial grassland
• Seek opportunities to convert arable land to permanent pasture
TW PZ 1 Gamston and Edwalton Meadowlands
Policy: Conserve and Create
Character Summary
This area is made up of 2 small narrow belts of land that lie on the suburban fringes of Edwalton
and Gamston to the east of the city of Nottingham. To the north the urban edge of West Bridgford
forms the western boundary. The southern section contained by more recent housing
development in Gamston to the east and the housing of Edwalton to the west.
North of the A52 the area is flat and low lying with some medium and small scale fields grazed by
ponies. Field boundaries are a mixture of post and wire, timber post and rail fence and out grown
hawthorn hedgerows.
South of the A52 is a narrow stretch of land along the Grantham Canal. This canal was opened in
1797 and for over one hundred years it was used for transporting coal, lime and stone between
Nottingham and Grantham. The canal is no longer navigable and in the 1970s road construction
for the Gamston Lings Bar road severed the canal corridor. The canal is a SINC site that is noted
for good aquatic plant life and its tow path now provides a recreational route for the surrounding
residential areas of Gamston.
To the south against the A52 lies Edwalton Golf Course which has a belt of mixed woodland
which screens views out into the wider landscape. The golf course is highly maintained and
gently undulates over fairways to the south. There is a small piece of mature woodland and scrub
to the north of Edwalton Primary School and a playing field to the south of the school.
To the north roadside hedgerows are generally in good condition, with ditches running along side
slightly elevated roads such as Regatta Way. Pony shelters, jumps, and stables are found within
these smaller fields. Elsewhere the suburban influence is evident with allotments, former sewage
works and other recreational land use near to the housing within Gamston and Edwalton.
TW PZ 2 – Polser Brook Meadowlands
PHOTOGRAPH CONTEXT
A52 west of Radcliffe on Trent
NCC Landscape sub Type: River Meadowlands
Policy Zone TW PZ 2
Land Cover Parcel TW7
Condition
Good REINFORCE


Poor CREATE
• Low lying flat landscape drained by the Polser brook. Sensitivity

• Mixture of small fields of pasture to the north east and medium sized arable fields
to the east.
• Small areas of recreational land use including a golf course and caravan park.
• Busy A52 road corridor dominated by associated structures and traffic.

Landscape Condition Condition Poor
This is a narrow linear area which is dominated by the busy A52 dual carriageway Pattern of Elements: Coherent
which gives it a coherent pattern. Alongside the A52 lies an assortment of associated
site furniture including lighting, signage and crash barriers which are all detracting Detracting Features: Many
features in the landscape; overall these lead to an interrupted visual unity.
Visual Unity: Interrupted
A narrow belt of woodland along the northern boundary of the road forms the edge of a
previously worked gravel pit and is now a SINC site known as Gamston pits. Tree cover Ecological Integrity: Moderate
is evident along the Polser Brook and within some hedgerows particularly around fields
of pasture. The golf course is highly and intensively maintained and generally the Cultural Integrity: Variable
arable land within the area tends to be more intensively treated than the smaller fields
of pasture that are grazed by horses and cows; overall this is a moderate habitat for Functional Integrity: Coherent
wildlife.
Cultural integrity is variable in that some of the historic features are still in evidence,
such as field pattern in pasture areas, but some features have been lost due to mineral
extraction and the intensification of agriculture.
A visually interrupted area with a coherent functional integrity / habitat for wildlife
gives a poor landscape condition
Landscape Sensitivity Sensitivity Low
The landscape within this area is primarily influenced by the presence of the A52. Distinctiveness: Indistinct
Roadside furniture, lighting and small scale commercial development along with
intensive arable farmland gives an indistinct feel to this area with few historic features. Continuity: Historic
The limited tree cover and relatively low amount of historic built structures gives this
area a weak sense of place. Sense of Place: Weak
The degree of visibility is moderate due to gently undulating landform and intermittent Landform: Apparent
tree cover. A weak sense of place with a moderate degree of visibility leads to a low
landscape sensitivity. Extent of Tree Cover Intermittent
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS - Create
• Enhance the visual unity of small scale commercial and roadside developments by filtering views from the road network with small scale
trees and woodland planting.
• Conserve rural character by limiting standardised treatments during highway improvement schemes.
• Conserve and enhance the tree cover through replanting and regeneration of meadowland hedgerows and hedgerow trees.
• Diversify road side character through the management and creation of flower rich grasslands on highway verges.
• Use native species of trees and shrubs suitable for Trent Washlands Regional Character Area on areas of recreational and amenity land,
such as golf courses, fishing lakes and caravan parks.
• Seek opportunities for the creation and enhancement of wet alluvial grassland and meadows
• Create new wetland and marginal habitats along the Polser Brook to enable it to function as a wildlife corridor.
TW PZ 2 Polser Brook Meadowlands
Policy: Create
Character Summary
This linear area lies to the east of the City of Nottingham along the A52 corridor up to the western
edge of Radcliffe on Trent. To the south the area follows the line of a small water course known
as Polser Brook which drains in the direction of the village of Holme Pierrepoint and eventually to
the River Trent.
This is a flat and low lying landscape with some medium distance views out to low wooded
skylines of the Dumble Farmlands to the north.
Tree cover is relatively limited with a maturing woodland belt to the north of the A52 which
screens views out over the restored gravel pit. A line of overhanging trees runs against the brook.
Hedgerow trees tend to be Ash and Willow and are found particularly within road side hedges.
In the north east of the area there is a dismantled railway line adjacent to which are medium and
small fields of unimproved pasture. Larger fields of arable crops are found around the caravan
park to the east. Development is limited to this caravan site, the northern section of Cotgrave golf
course, a public house to the southern edge and individual dwellings such as farm buildings and
a road side café against the A52.
Fields are generally small to medium-sized and the historic field pattern has largely disappeared
except for a small area to the south east of semi regular shaped fields.
TW PZ 3 Holme Pierrepont and Bassingfield Village Farmlands
PHOTOGRAPH CONTEXT
Eastern edge of City of Nottingham

NCC Landscape Sub Type: Village Farmlands
Policy Zone TW PZ 3
Land Cover Parcel TW3, TW4 and TW5
Condition
Good REINFORCE


Poor CREATE
• Flat and low lying landscape Sensitivity

• Recreational and amenity land uses associated with the previously worked gravel
pits
• Open bodies of water close to urban edge of City of Nottingham
• Parkland around historic core of Holme Pierrepont
• Medium sized arable fields with smaller fields of pasture to the north of Radcliffe
on Trent
• Grantham Canal and associated wetland marsh vegetation

Landscape Condition Condition Good
This an area with relatively few detracting features. Those that exist are pylons to the Pattern of Elements: Coherent
east, floodlighting to new sports pitches along Regatta Way and a short section of the
A52 west of Radcliffe on Trent. There is a coherent pattern of elements which overall Detracting Features: Few
gives a visually unified area.
Visual Unity: Unified
North of the A52 is a large SINC site covering worked gravel pits which is now made up
of open water, marsh, scrub and woodland which is of particular value for birds. Field Ecological Integrity: Moderate
boundaries tend to be mixed with both fragmented and strong hedges and some
mature hedgerow trees. The area forms a moderate habitat for wildlife. Cultural Integrity: Variable
The historic core of Holme Pierrepont village contrasts with the more recently modified Functional Integrity: Coherent
landscape of mineral extraction of sand and gravel within a wider agricultural
landscape. The cultural integrity is variable; overall this gives a coherent functional
integrity / habitat for wildlife
A visually unified area with a coherent functional integrity / habitat for wildlife gives a
good landscape condition
The area has a moderate sense of place retaining historic features characteristic of Distinctiveness: Characteristic
the Trent Washlands Regional Character Area. Bassingfield village has remained a
small settlement in redbrick with quiet country lanes surrounding this. The only Continuity: Historic
exception is the busy A52 to the north and west of this settlement.
Sense of Place: Moderate
Around Bassingfield the narrow hedge lined lanes with their ditches and verges have a
distinct rural feel. Holme Pierrepont village has a strong parkland character. Although it Landform: Apparent
is surrounded by worked out gravel pits, the mature tree cover and several historic
buildings including the Hall give it a strong sense of time depth. Extent of Tree Cover Intermittent
The villages of Bassingfield and Holme Pierrepont along with sections of the Grantham
Canal all contribute to the Trent Washland Character Area. Only the disused railway
lines and some of the larger former mineral sites and sports fields are all relatively
indistinct and recent
The degree of visibility is moderate due to gently undulating landform and intermittent
tree cover. A moderate sense of place with a moderate degree of visibility leads to a
moderate landscape sensitivity.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS - Conserve and Reinforce
• Conserve the character and setting of village settlements

• Conserve the pastoral character and promote measures for enhancing the ecological diversity of alluvial grasslands
• Diversify roadside character through the management and creation of flower rich grasslands on highway verges
• Reinforce built character with use of vernacular materials within existing village settlements
• Reinforce historic field pattern where this has been lost and conserve the traditional pattern of hedged fields elsewhere.
• .Promote measures for strengthening the existing level of tree cover
• Strengthen the continuity and ecological diversity of stream corridors
TW PZ 3 Holme Pierrepont and Bassingfield Village
Farmlands
Policy: Conserve and Reinforce
Character Summary
This is a low lying flat and broad area of land lying within the Trent Valley either side of the A52 to
the eastern edge of Nottingham.
To the north west lies a small village made up of secluded houses set within wooded gardens as
well as various farm buildings and Holme Pierrepont Hall. This Tudor house is a listed building set
within parkland that was built by Sir William Pierrepont around 1509 and altered in 1790 and
1812. The village itself is dominated by red brick and pantile roofed buildings and the mature tree
cover tends to filter views out into the wider landscape that has been left to open water following
gravel extraction. The area also lies within Nottingham’s Green Belt.
To the east of Regatta Way are several new sports pitches and the proximity of the urban edge
is evident in the recreational use of the surrounding landscape for camp sites, fishing as well as
flood lit sports fields.
To the south of the A52 are medium sized arable fields with smaller semi irregular fields closer to
Bassingfield. The Grantham Canal forms the southern boundary to this area which is enclosed by
hedges and narrow belts of trees. This canal stretches 33 miles from the River Trent to Grantham
and was constructed in the 1800s to transport coal, lime and stone by narrow boat to and from
the River Trent to Grantham.
The majority of the pasture around Bassingfield is grazed by horses. Bassingfield itself is a small
settlement with a mixture of 19 century properties and more recent farm buildings and houses.
The surrounding lanes are enclosed and narrow being contained by Hawthorn hedges and Ash
and Field Maple hedgerow trees.
To the west of Radcliffe on Trent are both medium sized arable fields and smaller fields with
outgrown hedges containing Poplar, Ash, Willow and Sycamore. Birch trees and Hawthorn scrub
is found along the former railway line and to the south western corner of the area there are views
back to Nottingham to the north west.
TW PZ 4 Trent Field Meadowlands
PHOTOGRAPH CONTEXT

Condition
Good REINFORCE


Poor CREATE
• Flat low lying landscape against the River Trent. Sensitivity

• Medium sized fields of wet meadowland and horse grazed paddocks.
• Small clumps of Willow and Alder woodland.
• Formal national water sports centre on former gravel extraction site.
• Small finger ponds and water bodies surrounded by wetland scrub and trees.

Being close to the urban edge of Nottingham this landscape is generally used for Pattern of Elements: Coherent
recreational purposes with fields north of Lady Bay being either horse pasture or
informal open space. The Holme Pierrepont Water Sports Centre has a mixture of Detracting Features: Some
signage, structures and buildings such as boat sheds, amenity blocks and viewing
stands, which tend to be scattered around the western end of the formal rowing lake. Visual Unity: Coherent
To summarise it has a coherent pattern elements but some detracting features which
overall make the area visually coherent. Ecological Integrity: Strong
The National Water Sports Centre is within a Country Park and much of this is Cultural Integrity: Variable
designated as a SINC site noted for its mosaic of carr, scrub, marginal and open water
habitats on the former gravel workings. There is some tree cover (Willow) around Functional Integrity: Strong
Adbolton Ponds, which is also a SINC site, with some Ash and Willow along the River
Trent. Field boundaries tend to be either out grown Hawthorn, or post and wire fencing
in areas of horse grazing. Trees are mostly within hedgerows with occasional mature
trees within areas of pasture adjacent to the River Trent. A small block of mixed
deciduous woodland lies to the east of the area, making this area a strong wildlife
habitat overall.
Recent housing development is in keeping with the local character. The cultural
integrity is variable in that some features such as field pattern have been lost due to
mineral working and recreational development but in others this has been retained.
A visually coherent area with a strong functional integrity / habitat for wildlife gives a
good landscape condition
The historic field pattern shown on Sanderson’s 1835 map is still in evidence to the Distinctiveness: Characteristic
western end but the working of the gravel pits has led to a modified landscape to the
eastern side of this area, which now functions as a Water Sports Centre. Continuity: Historic
The Willow and Alder scrub around the worked gravel pits are characteristic of the Sense of Place: Moderate
Trent Washlands character area, as are the occasional clumps of Willow holt around
Adbolton Ponds and along the southern bank of the river. The area has a moderate Landform: Apparent
sense of place.
The absence of development immediately along side the River Trent respects the low
lying flood plain of this river. In some places existing hedgerows have become out
grown and fields are often made stock proof by post and wire fencing.
The degree of visibility is moderate due to gently undulating landform and intermittent
tree cover. Views out to the north tend to be of the wooded low hills around Colwick
and to the west of the built skyline of the centre of Nottingham.

LANDSCAPE ACTIONS – Conserve and Reinforce
Conserve and Reinforce
• Conserve the traditional pastoral character and undeveloped flood plain adjacent to the River Trent.
• Enhance the ecological diversity of the ‘river meadowlands’ character and seek opportunities to recreate wet alluvial grassland.
• Reinforce and strengthen the continuity and ecological diversity of stream and water courses.
• Conserve and enhance the pattern and special features of ‘river meadowland’ hedgerows.
• Enhance visual unity through appropriate small-scale tree and woodland planting
TW PZ 4 Trent Fields Meadowlands
Character Summary
This is a long swathe of land that lies south of the River Trent and south east of Nottingham. It is
a low lying and flat landscape which is generally open with the low wooded ridgeline of Colwick
lying to the north. To the south there are longer fragmented views across low lying fields whilst to
the west there are views of the skyline of Nottingham.
Gravel extraction over the past 40 years has left several open areas of water. The largest of
these was developed in to the National Water Sports Centre at Holme Pierrepont with a 2 km
rowing lake dominating this area. These restored areas of water are now part of Holme
Pierrepont Country Park popular with walkers, cyclists, and canoeists. The smaller water bodies
such as the finger ponds to the north east are used by anglers and bird watchers.
This is a recreational landscape with Holme Pierrepont and the River Trent forming the main
focus for activities such as rowing, sailing, canoe slalom, water skiing and quad biking. The river
location means that this area is well used for more informal activities such as walking and cycling.
To the western end are a series of sports fields with playgrounds closer to the urban edge. An
equestrian centre lies partially within this area and many of the meadowlands have been divided
up by post and wire fencing for the grazing of ponies.
The informal open space to the west is open grassland with small clumps of wet woodland of
Willow and Alder around Adbolton Pond. This small area of woodland, and the adjacent marsh,
and the majority of Holme Pierrepont Country Park are SINC sites.
TW PZ 7 Shelford Village Farmlands
PHOTOGRAPH CONTEXT
NCC Landscape Sub Type: Village Farmlands
Land Cover Parcel: TW11
Condition
Good REINFORCE


Poor CREATE
CHARACTERISTIC VISUAL FEATURES

Low Moderate High
• A Low lying flat landscape
• Narrow lanes with thick hedges and hedges on banks Sensitivity
• Medium sized arable fields
• Small mixed woodland blocks and strips
• Nucleated red brick village settlements

Landscape condition is defined as good. There are few detracting features, which Pattern of Elements: Coherent
include a short section of the busy A6097 to the north east of the area and telegraph
poles and wires. The visual unity is generally unified due to both few detracting Detracting Features: Few
features and the presence of characteristic features through out the area.
Visual Unity: Unified
Field Dyke Lane and Shelford Manor Ponds are both SINC sites but outside of the
fields surrounding the village the land is generally highly intensively farmed arable land. Ecological Integrity: Moderate
Most historic field boundaries are intact around village and although some hedgerows
are gappy, many are tall and bushy, particularly where they surround smaller areas of Cultural Integrity: Variable
pasture. There are linear blocks of deciduous woodland and small woodland blocks
such as Water Furrows Plantation and Moor Close Plantation. Overall the area is a Functional Integrity: Coherent
moderate habitat for wildlife. Where fields are in intensive arable production the
hedgerows are fragmented or have been removed. The cultural integrity is therefore
variable.
A moderate habitat for wildlife and a variable cultural integrity leads to a coherent
functional integrity / habitat for wildlife. An area which is visually unified with a
coherent functional integrity / habitat for wildlife gives a good landscape condition
Landscape sensitivity is defined as moderate. The historic field pattern is largely intact Distinctiveness: Characteristic
around the village with the remnants of an open field system against the eastern side of
the village. However outside the village the internal historic field pattern has been Continuity: Historic
removed due to the intensification of arable farming. Species are characteristic of the
Trent Washlands LCA and the time depth / continuity is historic. Sense of Place: Moderate
The majority of buildings within Shelford are 19th century red brick and clay pantile Landform: Apparent
roofed houses typical of the Trent valley and which give a strong sense of place. The
surrounding large arable fields are less distinctive and so give an overall moderate
sense of place. There are several listed buildings and structures within the village and
within the surrounding area.
Views are contained within the village and along roads where hedgerows are intact;
visibility is moderate. There are longer views within the Trent valley where hedges are
more fragmented.
A moderate sense of place with a moderate degree of visibility leads to moderate

LANDSCAPE ACTIONS – Conserve and Reinforce
• Conserve the historic character, nucleated pattern and setting of the village settlements – new development should respect the scale, design
and materials used traditionally.
• Conserve the historic field pattern by containing new development within historic boundaries.
• Conserve existing hedgerows and seek opportunities to restore the historic field pattern with new hedgerow planting.
• Reinforce and enhance ecological diversity of riparian vegetation and manage existing Willow trees by pollarding.
• Reinforce and increase tree cover by establishing hedgerow trees in existing hedge lines.
• Conserve historic ridge and furrow features.
TW PZ 7 Shelford Village Farmlands
Character Summary
This is a low lying flat landscape lying within the broad flood plain of the Trent Valley. To the
south west lies the small red brick nucleated village of Shelford. Nineteenth century red brick and
pantile roofed buildings tend to dominate this village though there is some more modern
development within the centre. Surrounding lanes are generally narrow with grass verges and
some ditches.
Arable farming is found to the north east of the village with the large modified arable fields within
the centre, fields to the east of Shelford Manor being park/ garden and remnants of an open field
system against the eastern side of the village. Pasture closer to the village is grazed by sheep
and horses.
There are some small blocks and linear belts of mature woodland cover such as Water Furrows
Plantation and Moor Close Plantation. Woodlands are mixed with Beech, Oak, Ash, and conifer
species, with Hazel and Hawthorn shrubs to the periphery. Hedgerow trees include Ash, Willow,
and Oak and tend to occur in stronger road side hedgerows and along tracks rather than with in
the internal boundaries within arable areas.
There are some views out to the slightly higher ground to the north across the River Trent and to
the rising scarp slope to the south.
TW PZ 51 Stoke Lock Meadowlands
PHOTOGRAPH CONTEXT

Condition
Good REINFORCE


Poor CREATE
• Flat, low lying landscape with flood alleviation embankments against the River Sensitivity
Trent.
• Open views from the Trent to wooded hills in the north and south.
• Intensive arable fields with pasture between the flood bunds and river.
• Abandoned gravel workings with establishing scrub vegetation.
• Some strong hedgerows particularly along farm tracks.

Landscape Condition Condition Moderate
The overall condition of this landscape is defined as moderate. This area lies to the Pattern of Elements: Coherent
east of Burton Joyce and west of Shelford. It extends south to Netherfield pits and north
up to the edge of Gunthorpe. Lying directly either side of the Trent, this area is Detracting Features: Some
relatively undeveloped and the pattern of landscape elements is coherent. Although it
has some detracting features these tend to be scattered, such as the pylons across the Visual Unity: Coherent
river bluff to the north west of Shelford, the former railway sidings and industrial unit to
the south west and the caravan retail site to the west of the A6097. Overall this is a Ecological Integrity: Moderate
visually coherent area
Cultural Integrity: Variable
There are several SINC sites within this area including Netherfield Pits (also a local
nature reserve) and Gunthorpe Lakes - both areas of old gravel workings, Burton Functional Integrity: Coherent
Meadows Loop and Shelford Carr. However, the intervening landscape is fairly
medium to large intensive arable fields with only narrow margin of less intensive
grazing pasture against the River Trent giving an overall ecological integrity of
moderate. Tree cover is generally riparian vegetation such as Willow and Ash against
the river and water courses. Some woodland is also found around Stoke Lock
consisting of Sycamore, Cherry, Hazel and Lime. Field boundaries tend to be variable
with some intact and well maintained and others fragmented with post and rail fencing
Gravel extraction sites have left a highly modified landscape in some areas but there
are other areas that are more intact closer to settlement edges. The cultural integrity is
therefore variable.
A moderate network for wildlife and a variable cultural integrity leads to a coherent
functional integrity/habitat for wildlife. An area that is visually coherent with a
coherent functional integrity/ habitat for wildlife has a moderate landscape condition.
Landscape sensitivity is defined as moderate. Settlements tend to be located on the Distinctiveness: Characteristic
edge of this area on slightly higher land outside the flood plain. Isolated and generally
red brick houses and cottages are found to the west of the A road in Gunthorpe and to Continuity: Historic
the eastern side of Stoke Bardolph, including the lock cottage at Stoke. The Holmes
farm house lies within the centre of this area on a river bluff. Sense of Place: Moderate
The absence of development immediately along side the River Trent respects the low Landform: Apparent
lying flood plain of this river. Hedgerows are strong in places particularly along tracks
where mixed hedges are more common. The features which give the area its local
distinctiveness are characteristic of the Trent Washlands RCA and the continuity/time
depth is historic (post 1600). The area has a moderate sense of place.
This is a flat landscape with some open areas of grazing next to the River Trent. This
flat landscape allows longer distance views up and down the Trent Valley. To the east
and west the views are contained by the low often wooded hills. The apparent / flat?
landform and intermittent tree cover which leads to moderate visibility of the area
from outside the PZ.

LANDSCAPE ACTIONS - Conserve and Reinforce
• Conserve the traditional pastoral character and undeveloped flood plain adjacent to the River Trent.
• Enhance the ecological diversity of the river meadowlands and seek opportunities to recreate wet grassland.
• Reinforce and strengthen the continuity and ecological diversity of stream and water courses.
• Conserve and enhance the pattern and special features of meadowland hedges.
• Enhance visual unity through appropriate small-scale tree and woodland planting
TW PZ 51 Stoke Lock Meadowlands
Policy: Conserve and Create
Character Summary
This is a flat valley landscape that is dominated by arable land use. Arable farming has generally
led to the loss of internal field boundaries although there are still some smaller fields used for
arable crops with strong hedgerows. There are also small areas of pasture particularly
immediately alongside the River Trent which are crossed by the long distance footpath “The Trent
Valley Way”
The area has the impression of being well wooded due to tall hedgerows particularly along farm
tracks. However woodland tends to be actually limited to localised areas such as around Stoke
Lock, west of Shelford Manor and some of the former gravel extraction sites.
Field sizes vary from small paddocks adjacent to the village of Gunthorpe and the Cocker Beck
water course to larger fields in the arable areas.
The historic field pattern has largely been modified by the intensification of arable farming. The
hedgerows are generally trimmed hawthorn hedges, with ash hedgerow trees.
There is some commercial development along A6097 with caravan sales and van hire to the
north eastern edge of this area. However settlements tend to be located to the edge of this area
outside the immediate flood plain on slightly higher ground.
TW055 West Bridgford Recreational Fringe
CONTEXT
Regional Character Area: Trent Washlands
LDU Reference: 399
DPZ Reference: TW055
• Low, flat landform associated with the River Trent

• Concrete stepped bank to the river acts as a flood defence, with railings and open timber bollards to
define the top of the river bank
• The area has an urban green space character, with recreation, scrub and underused land, enclosed by
surrounding urban development to the north and the south
• The River Trent flows through the central part of the area. The tree lined Victoria Embankment is to
the immediate north of the river
• Large expansive recreational area set in a slightly lower bowl to collect flood water to the north of the
river
• Victoria Embankment a park and formal recreational open space to the north, with children’s play area
and large amenity playing fields and a paddling pool
• Victoria Embankment consists of large open areas of amenity grass land, children’s play area and an
ornamental garden, containing formal shrub beds and an ornate water feature
• Formal avenues of mature plane trees line the road, promenade and central axis through the park, with
the addition of pockets of ornamental trees within the park, give a wooded character along the north
edge of the river
• Playing fields to the south have wooded boundaries surrounding large grass fields. Woodland belts
and establishing scrub on parcels of land adjacent to the river contribute to the wooded enclosure
• Scrub vegetation is beginning to establish along the river bank and in areas of land surrounding The
Becket and Nottingham Emmanuel schools, which also contribute to a wooded character
• Large red brick 1930s detached properties, face out over the river along Victoria Embankment, set in
large gardens with trees and gated entrances
• Suburban residential, red brick, semi-detached properties form the northern and southern boundaries,
with occasional individual distinctive properties
• Commercial buildings and a newly constructed modern secondary school are present on the south of
the river bank with two distinctive seven storey, high density, residential buildings which are
prominent on the skyline
• Views across the open spaces are enclosed by urban development and woodland. Key buildings in the
city centre, including the castle are visible above the housing with glimpses to ridgelines to north and
south. Floodlights from the sports grounds are also visible on the horizon
• There are three bridges crossing the River Trent within the area, with the A60 London Road Bridge
being a busy route, linking the north and south of the city and Lady Bay Bridge and a pedestrian only
suspension bridge
• The grand limestone war memorial which marks the entrance to the formal memorial gardens is a
distinctive and elaborate feature along Victoria Promenade
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
A low lying landform within the floodplain of the River Trent, with
designed flood defences. The land is amenity parkland and
recreational space associated with a water course. It is
characterised by modern modified fields which form a number of
urban green spaces. The area is quite open but enclosed by the
urban fringes of Nottingham and West Bridgford and by woodland
along the fringes of open spaces.
Land use is mainly recreation with pockets of residential and

commercial buildings increasing towards the fringes of the city.
The recreational parkland north of the river has a large expansive
amenity open space, children’s play equipment, and a small
paddling pond used in summer. An ornamental memorial garden
containing formal shrub beds and an ornate knot style water feature
is marked at its entrance by a distinctive limestone war memorial
gate structure leading from Victoria Embankment. To the south
grassland is bordered by wooded fringes.
A distinctive mature tree line avenue is an important feature within

this landscape. There are plane trees along the length of Victoria
Embankment to the A60 London Road Bridge. Additional native and
ornamental trees within the Victoria Embankment, emerging scrub
along the southern edge of the river bank, and woodland around the
playing fields to the south, give the area a wooded character.
The landscape condition is MODERATE with localised evidence of

lack of maintenance across the park. Railings to the boundary need
to be re-painted. The war memorial is in need of maintenance and
there is no access over the river from one bridge which has been
closed for safety reasons. The paddling pool gives the impression
of an abandoned feature throughout the winter months although it
is likely that this appearance alters through the summer.
Landscape Strength
The DPZ is enclosed by the urban fringes of Nottingham, although
there are filtered views into the area from the urban edges
surrounding the area. From the north the views are filtered through
the structure planting surrounding the park. There are open views
across individual open spaces and channelled views along the river,
which is a distinctive feature. Views are often contained by
woodland and built form. Key city buildings, including Nottingham
Castle are visible in the skyline to the north.
The strength of character of the area is MODERATE. The features

although regularly distributed, are not strong enough to be
distinctive or to give a highly unique sense of place except close to
the river where the war memorial and river are distinctive features.
The land use varies from amenity, built development and rough
scrub typical of an area of green space within an urban location.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Conserve the open character of the recreational amenity playing fields
• Conserve the distinctive tree lined avenue along the river embankment
• Enhance the quality and condition of the memorial garden to improve the existing vegetation and
appearance of the area
• Enhance the character of the river and Victoria Embankment to provide greater unity and focus within
the DPZ on the river
• Enhance the fringes of the open spaces through additional woodland
• Enhance fringes of the river through localised tree planting/natural regeneration to soften built form
bordering the area
Built form
• Conserve the detached housing set within mature gardens along Victoria Embankment
• Maintain and enhance views of distinctive and prominent buildings along the River Trent such as
County Hall through management of trees and development to retain and frame views
• Enhance the school grounds through planting along the boundaries to help soften them and reduce its
prominence in views to the north of the river.
• Improve and restore the condition of the War Memorial to enable the temporary security fencing to be
removed
• Enhance views towards distinctive landmarks with the city, such as the City Council House, the Castle
and St Mary’s church through careful siting of new development and planting to maintain a connection
between the river and the city centre
VALE OF BELVOIR
VB01 Vale of Belvoir

VALE OF BELVOIR
Key Characteristics
• Broad low-lying clay vale extending as an elongated arc along the foot of
a Jurassic escarpment, the Belvoir Ridge;
• Underlain by bluish grey mudstones and clays alternating with flaggy
limestones.
• The soft Lower Lias provide subdued gently rolling landform; low hillocks
are formed by the presence of thin bands of limestone;
• Transition between Lower Lias and Mercia Mudstone is marked by a
narrow outcrop of dark shales known as Rhaetic beds which form a low
escarpment on the character area boundary;
• Soils are a mix of clayey slowly permeable soils subject to prolonged
waterlogging and lighter calcareous clay soils on limestone;
• Low escarpments provide a sense of enclosure to the western, northern
and southern fringes of this character area;
• Unified character exists across this regional character area;
• Strong rural character with few settlements or scattered farmsteads;
• Villages are situated on the drier Triassic (Rhaetic) escarpment between
Langar and Staunton and contain older vernacular buildings and newer
architectural styles;
• Nucleated pattern of small red brick villages linked by narrow winding
lanes with wide grass verges;
• Small pocket of industry around Barnstone and Langar have a localised
influence on landscape character;
• Strong tradition of dairy farming which remains as a mosaic of grassland
within extensive arable farmland. Where present a small to medium scale
field pattern exists; the most extensive tract is between Colston Bassett,
Hickling and Kinoulton;
• Smaller scale pasture is present around village fringes and is often used
for horse paddocks; ridge and furrow is sometimes present;
• Medium to large scale pattern of hedged fields although field pattern
becomes more irregular where pasture and mixed farming are common;
• Geometric field patterns are common where the land is farmed for arable
crops;
• Hedgerow trees generally ash and oak are important components and
reinforce a sense of enclosure;
• Ridge and furrow is common along the low escarpment at Hickling;
• Woodland is infrequent and where it exists is locally prominent such as
on escarpments or around parkland at Colston Bassett and Staunton;
• Tree cover reduces around arable farming creating an open landscape
with extensive views;
• The engineered River Smite flows through the area although it is set
below the surrounding land and arable farmland extends up to its banks;
infrequent riparian vegetation marks its course; and
• Willow and riparian scrub are common along stream lines and ditches
particularly adjacent to pastoral fields.
VALE OF BELVOIR
• Conserve and restore the traditional pattern of land use and remote rural
character of the landscape;
• Conserve the strong and largely undeveloped character of the Vale;
• Ensure new buildings reflect the traditional use of red brick and pantile
roofs;
• Conserve the historic settlement pattern of small nucleated rural villages
on higher ground;
• Conserve the pattern of fields with frequent hedgerow trees and
infrequent woodland;
• Conserve the pattern of hedged pastoral fields and frequent hedgerow
trees;
• Promote measures for maintaining the ecological diversity and historic
character of the Vale pasture;
• Conserve existing intact tracts of pasture particularly along rural fringes
and within larger tracts to maintain continuity; and
• Conserve and strengthen the historic pattern of hedgerows and wide
grass verges along rural lanes.
VB01 Vale Of Belvoir
CONTEXT
Regional Character Area: The Vale of Belvoir
LDU reference: 192,193, 195,197
DPZ Reference: VB01
• Predominantly flat low lying landform with very gentle undulations, enclosed by rolling hills such as
Belvoir Ridge in Leicestershire to the south
• River Smite flows through the area; it is in set lower than the surrounding land, and is only identifiable
by riparian vegetation on its steep banks
• The disused Grantham Canal is a local feature; an ongoing restoration project it is a popular
recreational feature
• A remote rural character across the whole area, with occasional views to scattered villages and
individual farms although mostly a remote, tranquil and undeveloped character
• The majority of land use is arable farmland although closer to the village fringes smaller pasture fields
become more apparent, usually used as horse paddocks. A more continuous tract of permanent
pasture is found between Colston Bassett, Kinoulton and Hickling
• Large scale regular patterned fields are common to the west of the area, although medium sized fields
are present in the east. Pasture fields closer to the villages are smaller, although elsewhere integrate
with the pattern and scale of arable fields. There are more trees around the pastoral fields which give
a slightly stronger sense of enclosure to that of the arable fields. Closer to the Grantham Canal as the
land gently slopes the field pattern becomes more irregular
• Field boundaries are predominantly maturing hawthorn hedgerows, up to 1.5m in height, especially
around Colston Bassett. Field ditches are present at some boundaries usually along roads
• In the south there are very few hedgerow trees, these become more frequent towards the north of the
area in the transition between the vales and the South Nottinghamshire Farmlands
• Woodland is dispersed and includes occasional blocks, clumps and linear belts. The main woodland
component is formed by frequent clumps along field margins and around farms. Locally prominent
woodland is found in parkland around Colston Bassett Hall
• Clumps of woodland associated with water courses, along the Grantham Canal and maturing
hedgerows are prominent linear wooded features
• The medieval ploughing system of ridge and furrow is evident close to the village of Kinoulton and
along the low escarpment at Hickling and is locally distinctive
• Small scattered villages through out the area include the linear settlements of Kinoulton, and Hickling
and the smaller nucleated settlements of Colston Bassett and Owthorpe. Larger settlements of Langar
and Cropwell Bishop are situated on the fringes of the DPZ
• The DPZ contains distinctive vernacular settlements such as Hickling
• Urban form is generally uniform and has mainly red brick properties with some larger individual
rendered properties. Settlements are dispersed and tend to have rooflines visible within wooded edges
• Villages often contain one main street or a couple with a small junction including a small grassed area
and trees. Many properties have small well maintained gardens with some smaller former farm
buildings bordering the street. Avenues of trees are also common
• There is a linear dispersion of farms and larger farm buildings mostly situated close to roads
• Churches at Langar and Granby are prominent skyline features on high ground. Hickling church tower
is prominent above a dispersed village edge
• Extensive views beyond the DPZ towards the Belvoir Ridgeline in Leicestershire with Belvoir Castle
prominent on the wooded ridgeline
• Winding narrow lanes thread across the area linking the scattered villages. They have medium to wide
grass verges with frequent ditches, some have very steep sides
• Overhead lines are visible over the area due to the low-lying landform
• Langar airport, with its industrial buildings and runways has a localised urbanising effect on the rural
mostly undeveloped appearance of the landscape
LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS
Condition
A predominantly flat, low-lying landform with gentle undulations,
enclosed by surrounding rolling hills and the Belvoir Ridgeline in
Leicestershire. It has a rural character with few urban features,
where present these comprise scattered villages and isolated large
farm buildings.
The area has a mixed field pattern, with medium semi-regular and
irregular field patterns close to the settlement fringes and more
modern larger modified field pattern across the remainder of the
landscape. There is a former military airfield at Langar in the south
of the DPZ now used for commercial uses.
The area has little woodland cover although linear woodland belts
are found along the water courses, with riparian species, such as
willow and poplar and an occasional ash. There are occasional
woodland coverts and a regular dispersal of small clumps of
younger trees found primarily around settlement fringes. Horse
chestnut and mature hawthorn are found in avenues along roads.
The landscape condition is MODERATE. There is some hedgerow

fragmentation occurring at fields boundaries, although hedgerows
along roads are well maintained and in generally good condition.
There is relatively little evidence of decline, and generally the area
appears to be managed
Landscape Strength
Views are over long distances across the area, although in places
filtered by tall well maintained hedgerows, towards Belvoir Ridge in
Leicestershire. Views contain rooflines and prominent churches
filtered by the wooded edges of the settlements, and frequent large
farm properties. Rural views with frequent grazing livestock are a
feature.

consistent rural character with few urban features. It is a flat arable
landscape with large regular field patterns and pockets of
woodland. The pattern varies closer to the settlements, where
smaller pastoral fields create a sense of enclosure. Land alters
between arable farming which is slightly more open and the more
enclosed and intimate pastoral fields. However the rural landscape
and ENHANCE.
has distinctive church towers and spires which are visible above
scattered wooded edged settlements and occasional individual large
farm buildings are consistent across the DPZ.
This DPZ shares some similar characteristics to Aslockton village

farmlands however it differs through a greater amount of pasture
farming, smaller more dispersed settlements, more prominent
wooded streams and watercourses and its low-lying land form
enclosed by higher ground on all sides.
LANDSCAPE ACTIONS
Landscape features
• Conserve the older field pattern particularly where there is evidence of older semi-regular and irregular pattern close
to settlement edges at Hickling, Colston Bassett and Kinoulton
• Conserve and enhance hedgerow field boundaries by infill planting where fragmentation has occurred to ensure
field pattern is maintained
• Conserve and enhance continuous expansive views towards the ridgeline in Leicestershire and Belvoir Castle
• Enhance the distribution of hedgerow trees by increasing numbers within field boundaries to increase the wooded
character of the area, particularly in arable farmed areas where the land tends to be more open
• Conserve the ridge and furrow where present particularly within fields close to Kinoulton and Hickling
• Conserve areas of pasture at settlement fringes, as these are key features within this landscape and remnants of a
once more extensive pastoral landscape
• Conserve and enhance the fringes of the watercourses, the Grantham Canal and the River Smite, through small
scale riparian planting
• Conserve the roadside hedgerows and avenues of horse chestnut and ash ensuring a programme for maintenance
and replacement where they have become senescent
• Enhance the Kilnoulton Marsh and wetlands establishing along the Canal through seeking to extend the area where
possible and encourage management to retain them as local landscape features
• Conserve and enhance the informal recreational character of the Grantham Canal
• Conserve and enhance surrounding Colston Bassett Hall, ensuring replacement tree planting and return of pasture
within its grounds
• Conserve views to higher ridgelines through managing and careful placement of built form and woodland
vegetation to maintain the sense of enclosure within the landscape and framing of views
• Built form
• Conserve and enhance the remote rural tranquil character of the area through ensuring built form remains
insignificant in the landscape through appropriate siting and planting
• Conserve the prominence of the village churches in the skyline
• Any developments on the village fringes should use red brick and pantile roofs and make a positive contribution to
local character and distinctiveness within individual villages
• Conserve tree cover and pasture at the village fringes which softens the appearance of villages within the
landscape Conserve the distinctive historic core of villages
• Enhance the airfield at Langar, ensuring that new development is kept to a minimum and where required appears as
farm-scale buildings, potentially incorporating, where practical, small scale copses and clumps of trees around
fringes of the airport
• Conserve and enhance wide grass verges and distinctive ditches and wetlands along small rural roads through the
character area
• Conserve the network of small roads; any highway improvements should be carefully designed and implemented to
avoid urbanising effects

Solar Farm Guide Nov 2022

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Solar Farm Guide Nov 2022

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Solar Farm Guide Nov 2022

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rushcliffe Borough Council

Solar Farm Development

2. Purpose and scope of Guide

2.1 This document is intended to provide broad guidance on:

3. Planning Policy Context

Local Planning Policy

Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy (LPP1)

Local Plan Part 2: Land and Planning Policies (LPP2)

National Planning Policy & Guidance

3.9 The NPPF is also a material consideration, in particular where the

3.10 The Government’s online Planning Practice Guidance (PPG) provides

“The deployment of large-scale solar farms can have a negative impact on

Particular factors a local planning authority will need to consider include:

The approach to assessing cumulative landscape and visual impact of large

4. Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA)

6. Key Material Planning Considerations

Compliance with Green Belt policy (where relevant)

Landscape & Visual Impacts

6.8 Rushcliffe’s predominantly rural landscape is a key part of the Borough’s

6.12 When assessing the significance of impacts a number of criteria should be

Ecology & Biodiversity

6.16 As stated above, Rushcliffe’s predominantly rural landscape is a key part of

6.19 Policy 17(3) is also clear that development on or affecting non-designated

Best Most Versatile Agricultural Land (BMV)

6.31 Applications for major solar farm developments will be expected to be

1 Paragraph 013 - Renewable and low carbon energy - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

6.40 Further advice on historic environment issues relating to different types of

Open Space, Green Infrastructure Network & Other Recreational Uses

6.46 Furthermore, if any PROW has to be temporarily or permanently diverted, then

Site and Internal Access

Grid Connection & Potential Generating Profile

6.50 Typically, electricity generated by a major solar farm development will be

6.57 Ideally site levelling/re-grading and similar groundworks should be kept to a

Decommissioning and Restoration

2 Paragraph 013 - Renewable and low carbon energy - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

3 Paragraph 023 - Renewable and low carbon energy - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

Amenity, Pollution, Glint and Glare & Safety

4 Paragraph 013 - Renewable and low carbon energy - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

6.69 Where a battery energy storage is proposed on the development site, a

Flood Risk & Drainage

6.71 Policy 17 of LPP2 is supportive of development proposals that are within

Site Security (fencing and CCTV)

Appendix 1 Plan of Regional Landscape Character Areas in Rushcliffe.

Appendix 2 Information to be included in a Landscape and Visual Impact

Appendix 3 Appendices from Greater Nottinghamshire Landscape Character

3. Landscape Baseline Conditions

7. Presentation of the Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment

DPZ within this Regional Character Area:

NW01 Gotham and West Leake Wooded Hills and Scarps

• Defined by a low boulder clay plateau traditionally known as ‘wolds’

Guidelines and Recommendations

Land use is a mix of plantation woodland, arable farming and

Woodland comprises large geometric field sized blocks of both

The landscape condition is GOOD. Hedgerows and woodland are

The strength of character is STRONG. The hills are distinctive and

Fields are a mixture of small fields close to watercourses and large-

The area has a low level of woodland cover. Woodland tends to be

The landscape condition is MODERATE. Features are generally well

The strength of character of the area is STRONG. The area has a

Fields are a mixture of medium to large scale fields and include