School Learning Recovery Plan 1
School Learning Recovery Plan 1
School Learning Recovery Plan 1
VALENCIA DISTRICT
BOHOL DIVISION
i
School Learning Recovery Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages
School Information
School Learning Recovery Plan Team
Introduction
Rationale
Purpose of the Plan
Identifying the Learning Gaps
Assessment Results: Quarter Assessments
Kindergarten Assessments
PHIL-IRI Results
EGRA Results
EGMA Results
Priority Learning Recovery Areas of Concern
Action Plan and Intervention
Learning Recovery Intervention Flow
Monitoring and Evaluation
1
Date: 12-12-2022
Distribution list:
Copy No Issued to
1 Rosario A. Galorport - Head Teacher I
2 Merabel T. Almedilla - Kindergarten Teacher
3 Josephine P. Daling - Grade I Teacher
4 Mariam May A. Cagatin - Grade I Teacher
5 Delia D. Aclan - Grade 2 Teacher
6 Joan Lacaya - Grade 2 Teacher
7 Estrella P. Lagare - Grade 3 Teacher
8 Zed Kenneth A. Molina - Grade 3 Teacher
9 Elenita P. Navea - Grade 4 Teacher
10 Rovelyn C. Yecyec - Grade 4 Teacher
11 Candelaria T. Idul - Grade 5 Teacher
12 Neil T. Tagaan - Grade 6 Teacher
13 Isidora H. Codilla- Public Schools District Supervisor
ROSARIO A. GALORPORT
Chairman
NEIL T, TAGAAN
Vice-Chairman
ROVELYN C. YECYEC
Member DELIA D. ACLAN
Member
Also included are the extension of the school calendar, expanding learning
time, establishing a learning support center in school and community-based learning
spaces, and hiring additional learning support aides. Moreover, DepEd plans to
intensify its reading interventions, conduct regular home visits and follow-ups,
implement physical and virtual study groups, buddy systems, establish literacy at
home and in the community, tap the services of parents, guardians, teacher volunteers
and develop appropriate assessment tasks and resources.
II. Rationale
Pursuant to DepEd Order No. 34, s. 2022, entitled School Calendar and
Activities for SY 2022-2023, all public and private schools are directed to submit the
electronic and hard copies in book format of their Learning Recovery and Continuity
Plan (LRCP) for SY 2022-2023 to SY 2024-2025 to the Schools Division Office. In
this connection, Omjon Elementary School has come up with a three-year learning
scheme to help learners catch up after two years of disruption due to the corona virus
pandemic. The school’s learning recovery plan (SLRP) was presented during Board
of Directors Meeting at Omjon Elementary School, Omjon, Valencia, Bohol.
The plan will give more attention to the literacy and numeracy skills of the
learners who were affected by lockdowns and self-learning approach during the
pandemic. The Brigada Eskwela campaign also focuses on mobilizing resources and
strengthening partnership engagements with partners, to complement the office’s
efforts in addressing learning gaps brought by the coronavirus disease (Covid-19)
pandemic through the implementation of the Learning Recovery Plan.
The aim of this learning recovery plan is to mitigate the effects of any crises
or emergency that may affect schools, which could disrupt the critical activities to
such an extent that it may damage the schools reputation, loss of premises and effect
the ability to provide quality education. The goal is not only to bring learners back to
school but to organize effective remedial learning, support their well-being and train
teachers, as classes for the school year 2023-2024. The Learning Recovery Plan shall
focus on the three key learning areas:
Today's learners need to know not only the basic reading and
arithmetic skills, but also skills that will allow them to face a world that is
continually changing. They must be able to think critically, to analyze, and
to make inferences. Changes in the skills and knowledge of our students
need require new learning goals; these new learning goals change the
relationship between assessment and instruction. Teachers need to take an
active role in making decisions about the purpose of assessment and the
content that is being assessed.
5
School Learning Recovery Plan
A. Quarter Assessments
Table 1 shows that there are two (2) learners from Grade 2, one (1) from
Grade 3, two (2) from Grade 4 and two (2) from Grade 5, a total of Seven (7) learners
who did not meet the expectation in Filipino.
Table 2. School Consolidated Quarter 1 English Assessments
As portrayed on table 2 above, there are two (2) learners from Grade 2, five
(5) from Grade 3, two (2) from Grade 4 and three (3) from Grade 5, a total of twelve
(12) learners who did not meet the expectation in English.
6
School Learning Recovery Plan
Table 3. School Consolidated Quarter 1 Mathematics Assessments
The table 3 above shows that there is one (1) learner from Grade 1, two (2)
from Grade 2, three (3) from Grade 3, two (2) from Grade 4 and two (2) from Grade
5, a total of Ten (10) learners who did not meet the expectation in Mathematics.
Table 4. School Consolidated Quarter 1 Science Assessments
7
School Learning Recovery Plan
Table 4. School Consolidated Quarter 1 Science Assessments
Table 4 shows that there are four (4) learners from Grade 3, two (2) from
Grade 4 and one (1) from Grade 5, a total of seven (7) learners who did not meet the
expectation in Science.
Table 5 shows that there is one (1) learner from Grade 1, two (2) from Grade
2, one (1) from Grade 3, two (2), two (2) from Grade 4 and two (2) from Grade 5, a
total of eight (8) learners who did not meet the expectation in MAPEH.
8
School Learning Recovery Plan
Table 6. School Consolidated Quarter 1 Aral. Pan Assessments
Table 6 reveals that there is one (1) learner from Grade 1, two (2) from Grade
2, three (3) from Grade 3, two (2), two (2) from Grade 4 , a total of eight (8) learners
who did not meet the expectation in Aral. Pan.
Table 7 reveals that there is one (1) learner from Grade 1, two (2) from Grade
2, two (2) from Grade 3 and two (2), two (2) from Grade 4 , a total of seven (7)
learners who did not meet the expectation in ESP.
Table 8 reveals that there are two (2) learners from Grade 4 who did not meet
the expectation in TLE.
Table 9 shows that there is one (1) learner from Grade 1, two (2) from Grade
2, and one (2) from Grade 3, a total of four (4) learners who did not meet the
expectation in MTB.
Kindergarten Assessment
10
School Learning Recovery Plan
Kindergarten Q1 Assessment
37 37 37 37 37
22
19 19
16
13 11 11 11
8 10
7 5 7
2 4
NUMBER OF LEARNERS
. . . cs i.
ev ev m nv
D l D Co ati e
or a nd m t.
ot on he na
M oti ya at d
d m rac -M an
an -e i te 4 al
i ng ocio ,L ai
n ysic
be S ge m ph
e ll- 2
-
g ua Do e
n n th
,W ai La ng
l th m 3- di
a Do n n
He ai st
a
1- m er
ai
n Do Un
d
m 5-
Do n
ai
m
Do
COMPETENCY LEVEL
Enrolment Beginning Developing Consistent
B. PHIL-IRI RESULTS
11
School Learning Recovery Plan
Table 10. PHIL-IRI English Pre-Test
C. EGRA RESULTS
12
School Learning Recovery Plan
Table 12 reveals the overall results of the Grade 1 EGRA Assessment. Based
on results all of the 33 Grade 1 learners are non-readers.
Table 14 shows that there are seven (7) readers and thirty-six (36) non-readers
in Grade 3 learners.
D. EGMA RESULTS
15
School Learning Recovery Plan
Table 15-17 shows that there are 9 out of 32 Grade 1 learners who were
assessed, 32 out of 33 Grade 2 learners and 41 out of 42 learners who are identified as
non-numerate.
16
School Learning Recovery Plan
All these assessment findings are the school benchmarks in developing the
action plans, remediation and interventions in order to fully recover the learning loss
of learners due to the havoc brought about by the pandemic.
Based on the results of the assessments conducted, the above listed four (4)
learning recovery areas were identified by the SLRP Team. The recent EGRA and
Phil-IRI shows that there are still non-readers and struggling readers that needs to be
addressed. While EGMA results revealed that there are learners who have not
mastered the basic operations in mathematics that’s why the failed or barely passed
the assessments.
LITERACY
Learners
Attain 90% of the struggling
Parents
Brigada Pagbasa readers to read and 2022-2025
Teachers
comprehend
School Head
80% of the teachers to
Learners
Teaching-Learning develop an innovation to
Parents
Innovation with ESP addressed the learning needs 2022-2025
Teachers
Integration of learners with multiple
School Head
intelligence
80% of teachers to conduct Learners
action research to resolve Parents
teaching-learning hindrances Teachers
Action Research 2022-2025
and to attain higher learning School Head
outcomes and academic
achievements of learners.
NUMERACY
Learners
Attain greater mastery in the
Project B2B (Back to Basics Parents
basic operations in Mathematics 4 2022-2025
in Math to 6 Teachers
School Head
Learners
Use of Interactive Games
Increase learning results to 90% Parents
in Differentiated mastery of the skill/competency
2022-2025
Teachers
Instruction
School Head
Learning
Assessment
Analysis of
Results
M&E
Feedbacking
Parent-
Teacher
Roll-out Conference
Implementation
Crafting of
of the Plan Intervention
Thru CI Plan
Process
Project Read, Explain, Analize and Determined (READ) is a reading intervention for
struggling readers of Grades 4 to 6. It will address reading issues of learners in the
lower grades in order to increase the general learning results and learning outcomes.
19
School Learning Recovery Plan
Project CRIP
Learning
Assessment
M&E
Feedbacking
Analysis of
Results
Plan Roll-
out Parent-
Teacher
Conference
Implementat
ion of the Crafting of
Plan thru CI Intervention
Process Plan
Brigada Pagbasa
Identification
of
Struggling Parent-
Readers Teacher
Conference
M& E
Learning
Assessment
Reading
Volunteers
Campaign
Reading
Remediation
Brigada
Pagbasa
Orientation Launching
of
Volunteers
Week
Objective Activities Progress Remarks
No.
(1) Listening to the audio-video taking
notice of how each word is being
said/pronounce
#of
Fill in the blanks with the words inside Score
learner
the parenthesis:
2 4
7 3
(1) My grandparents lived in a
2 2
______________.
0 1
(2) During ____________ we go there
to visit them.
Use the words in a
7 (3) They have pigs to feed with
sentence
healthy baby __________.
(4) It’s a very _________ place to stay
during vacations and holidays.
Action Research
Attend AR-KATA 1
Crafting of Chapter 2
Attend AR-KATA 2
Utilization of the Action Research to other grade levels in school or adaption of the
innovation/intervention to the district level.
Figure 5. Action Research Process Flow
26
School Learning Recovery Plan
REACH MATH
( Refining and Enriching Abilities of Children in Math
Conduct of Quarter Assessment/EGMA
Analysis of Data
LRP Roll-out
Outcomes/Results Feedbacking
Analysis of Data
LRP Roll-out
Outcomes/Results Feedbacking
Assessment
Results
Monitoring and
Evaluation Google search for
an appropriate
intercative games
to enhance
Signatur
Name of Project Project Objectives and Date of Accomplish Issues/ Recommendati e of SPT
Targets Monitoring ments/ Problems / ons/ Action and
Status to Challenges Points Project
Date Team
Leader
___________________________________________
Monitored and Evaluate
30
School Learning Recovery Plan
Approved By: