Bach Notes 06
Bach Notes 06
Bach Notes 06
6 Fall 2006
B ACH N OTES
T HE N EWSLETTER OF THE A MERICAN B ACH S OCIETY
Paradoxically, both “old” and “new” musical compositions were held in high esteem in late
eighteenth-century Vienna. Interest in the fugal compositions of Johann Sebastian Bach and
several members of his family contributed greatly to the popularity of similar works by other
Baroque masters and their followers. These fugues were copied in astonishing numbers and also
widely performed. In contrast to Protestant Germany, where professional musicians, mainly
organists and music theorists, preserved the contrapuntal heritage of the past, dilettantes such
as Emperor Joseph II and Baron Gottfried van Swieten appear to have played leading roles in
this respect in Vienna.
these two prominent quotations? This question was raised recently compositions, but remarkably few chamber pieces (trios, quartets,
by Otto Biba, who argues that we run the risk of ignoring the broader sinfonias, or concertos). Many of the works that Mederitsch copied
context if we relate the Viennese Bach tradition to van Swieten alone.3 for sale that are preserved in the Berlin Staatsbibliothek correspond to
the works offered by Johann Traeg in his 1799 and 1804 catalogues.
The proper context for the well-known and, as Biba suggests, overrated It appears that Mederitsch worked for several music dealers as a free-
Mozart-van Swieten connection is established in this paper by (1) lance copyist, and he may have even hoped to set up his own copying
constructing a list of Bachian fugues preserved in Viennese sources, business in Lemberg.9
(2) exploring the extent to which Viennese performances of Bachian
keyboard fugues can be documented, and (3) discussing the significance Traeg’s catalogues, as one might expect from the connection with
of keyboard fugues arranged for string instruments.4 Mederitsch, also play a role in the study at hand.10 Unfortunately, not
all of the pieces included in the 1799 and 1804 offerings can be securely
Bachian Fugues in Vienna identified. These catalogues nevertheless serve as important sources
for future studies concerning the parallel distribution of printed and
manuscript music. Bachian fugues included in Traeg’s catalogues are
We take as our point of departure manuscript copies of fugues preserved listed in Table 3.
in Viennese libraries that likely circulated in the city before about
1810. These are listed in Table 1, where fugues from multi-movement Through the Traeg catalogues one also gains insight into the relative
works have been omitted unless the fugal movement was transmitted significance of Bachian fugues with respect to all the fugues and
independently of the entire work. contrapuntal instrumental compositions available in Vienna at the time.
Compositions by members of the Bach family form the core of the
The picture remains incomplete, however, unless manuscripts containing Protestant repertoire, which is completed primarily by works of central
fugues copied in Vienna around this time that now reside in libraries and north German composers of the Bach circle, such as Kellner,
outside the city are also taken into consideration. The former holdings Kirnberger, and Marpurg. The repertoire of works that originated in
of Franz Joseph von Hess, now housed in the Berlin Staatsbibliothek, Vienna is small by comparison, consisting mostly of compositions
serve as a prime example.5 Von Hess’s residence was home to concerts of historical significance by composers such as Caldara, Monn, and
regularly attended by Mozart, and in 1796 his library was referred to Muffat, though more recent contributions, notably by Johann Georg
by Joseph Edler von Schönfeld as a “collection of musical antiquities” Albrechtsberger and Georg von Pasterwitz, are also present.
that supposedly contained everything “Handel and the three Bachs [i.e.
Johann Sebastian, Carl Philipp Emanuel, and Wilhelm Friedemann]
had written.”6 At present, however, in addition to the two books of The van Swieten Collection
The Well-Tempered Clavier, the collection contains only ten fugal
compositions. (The presence of The Well-Tempered Clavier is not The sheer number of sources identified in Tables 1 through 3 makes
particularly surprising since Yo Tomita has identified a large number of it clear that there was considerable knowledge of Bachian fugues in
Viennese manuscripts in which book two of the collection is represented late eighteenth-century Vienna. The contrapuntal oeuvre of the Bach
in its entirety or by selections.7) sons is present almost in its entirety, and the selection of works by
Sebastian is broad and quite representative, covering early and late
Also relevant in the present context are the copies of Bachian fugues harpsichord and organ fugues, as well as similar works for other types
prepared by Johann Georg Anton Gallus Mederitsch (1752-1835), of instruments and even some vocal fugues. In fact, the reception of
who was born in Vienna and studied with Georg Christoph Wagenseil Bachian fugues in Vienna at this time ranked second only to that in
(1715-1777), the most prominent keyboard teacher during the time of Berlin, which was known as the secret “capital of Sebastian Bach.”11
Maria Theresa. Most of the manuscripts in the Mederitsch collection The Viennese Bach reception, then, can neither be explained by nor
were bequeathed to the Dommusikverein and the Mozarteum in 1844, restricted to the activities of Gottfried van Swieten, and from this new
as part of the legacy of Mozart’s son Franz Xaver. This collection is now contextualization one more clearly understands Mozart’s comment,
preserved primarily in the music archive of the Salzburg Cathedral, and made after van Swieten introduced him to the fugues of J. S., C. P. E.,
the Bachian fugues it contains are listed in Table 2. and W. F. Bach in the early 1780s, that the Baron’s music library is a
“highly valuable but with respect to quantity very small treasure of
Mederitsch’s activities as copyist have not yet been fully investigated, good music.” Unfortunately, neither a copy of van Swieten’s estate
but Theodor Aigner, the only author to devote a book-length study catalogue nor a significant number of identifiable manuscripts from his
to Mederitsch, presumed the copies of Bachian fugues originated after music library survive.
Mederitsch settled in Lemberg (now Lvov in western Ukraine) in
1817, where he was active as a piano teacher.8 Aigner maintains that There is reason to believe, however, that major portions of van Swieten’s
Mederitsch spent the last decades of his life copying thousands of pages estate were acquired by Johann Traeg and incorporated into his 1804
of music. This assertion is not confirmed, however, by the character catalogue. Such an acquisition would explain why shortly after 1800
of the handwriting or the watermarks of the paper, which usually large-scale vocal works by J. S. Bach, such as the Christmas Oratorio,
display the three crescents typical of the Italian paper used in Vienna. the Magnificat, and the Mass in B Minor, and C. P. E. Bach’s Hamburg
Mederitsch’s fair copies of works by other composers (all undated), oratorios, which otherwise did not circulate widely, were offered for
which clearly differ from his own compositional scores, likely stem sale. If events unfolded in this fashion, then van Swieten’s library may
from the last decade of the eighteenth century and first decade of the also have included the Bachian fugues offered by Traeg for the first time
nineteenth, during the time in which Mederitsch persevered in his in 1804. As seen in Table 3, the 1804 additions to the 1799 repertory
attempts to earn a living as a composer and piano teacher in Vienna. consist only of Friedemann’s complete set of “8 Fugues,” Fk 12, some
Mederitsch’s repertoire of works by other composers is highly unidentifiable “Preludes and Fugues” by Sebastian and also possibly
selective. It consists of piano and organ music, as well as sacred vocal “4 Toccatas” (not indicated in Table 3), which in all likelihood are the
same works preserved as “Toccatas 1 - 4” in the Mederitsch copies in however, may not have taken place in the concert hall. These reports
Salzburg (A-Sda, MN 104), namely the Chromatic Fantasia and Fugue, reveal, at the very least, that the following musicians—presented in
BWV 903, the Toccata in D Major, BWV 912, the Toccata in F-sharp chronological order—“studied” and “performed” Bachian fugues:
Minor, BWV 910, and the Prelude and Fugue in G Major, BWV 550. Wagenseil, Albrechtsberger, Johann Baptist Schenk, Mozart, Ludwig
van Beethoven, Joseph Lipawsky, Franz Xaver Mozart. Bachian fugues
may also have been studied and performed by Robert Kimmerling,
Bachian Fugues Studied and Performed of the reputable Melk Abbey (located about twenty-five miles from
Vienna), and Mederitsch.12
Of course the existence of numerous manuscript copies merely suggests,
but does not prove, that music of the Bachs was widely performed Further evidence that Bachian fugues were an active part of the musical
in late eighteenth-century Vienna. Greater evidence is provided by culture is provided by Schenk (most famous today for his contribution
a number of important early reports of public performances, which, to the Singspiel Der Stein der Weisen), who, in an autobiographical
Table 3: Bachian Fugues in the Catalogues of Johann Traeg from 1799 and 1804
Year Catalogue Number Composer Catalogue Entry Manuscript or Print
1799 16 CPEB 6 Fugen einzeln geschrieben Manuscript
1799 17 WFB 2 Fughe Manuscript
1799 48 WFB Fuga in F. minore Manuscript
1799 80 JSB die Kunst der Fuga 4 stimmig Manuscript
1799 19 JSB 24 Fug. p. il Clav. o per L’organo Manuscript
1799 20 JSB 24 Fughe detto Manuscript
1799 79 JSB 48 Präludien Manuscript
1799 51 JSB Musikalisches Opfer Manuscript
1804 88 JSB Preludes & Fugues Not indicated
Manuscript (not indicated, but these works
1804 82 WFB 8 Fugues
were not published until after 1804)
piece, wrote about his keyboard lessons with Wagenseil: “The preludes it was actually here [at Melk] that Albrechtsberger
and fugues by Sebastian Bach as well as the keyboard suites of Handel developed his skills in organ playing and composition
were my exercises.”13 Schenk’s studies with Wagenseil began in 1773 to such an extent that he had no equal. In the church
and it seems unlikely that his teacher would have added Bach’s fugues services he had to play two fugues and many preludes
to his teaching repertoire only as a sexagenarian. On this basis we may and versetten daily, a task for which he thoroughly
assume that Mederitsch, who reportedly often played fugues when prepared himself. The greatest masterpieces of both
(or rather than) teaching his students, was also introduced to Bach’s the oldest and the most contemporary composers
preludes and fugues, most likely from The Well-Tempered Clavier Clavier, resided at the Melk Abbey, and were at his disposal.
when he studied with Wagenseil.14 He diligently studied the works of Sebastian and
Philipp Bach, Graun, etc.15
Albrechtsberger received part of his musical training at Melk Abbey,
and returned there as an organist in 1759 after studies in the capital and The biography that Albrechtsberger’s pupil Ignaz von Seyfried added
brief appointments elsewhere. The writings of Abbé Maximilian Stadler to the posthumous edition of his teacher’s theoretical writings similarly
provide insight into his exposure to the music of the Bachs. Stadler, a confirms that “Albrechtsberger developed into a consummate theorist
friend of Mozart’s, who completed several of Mozart’s fragmentary by very diligently studying the works of Caldara, Fux . . . Graun,
compositions after the composer’s death, indicates Händel, the Bachs, and others, which the regens chori at Melk, Robert
Kimmerling, kindly made available to him.”16 Unfortunately, no Sebastian Bach’s Preludes & Fugues that he had a separate Pianoforte
traces remain of Kimmerling’s Bach manuscripts, but they must have with Pedals, fixed under the Other.”21 According to Nissen, Attwood
originated before Albrechtsberger’s final departure from Melk in 1765, also observed that “[t]his volume of fugues—The Well-Tempered
and must therefore be counted among the earliest Bach sources in the Clavier—was always lying open on Mozart’s pianoforte.”22
vicinity of Vienna.
With so many reliable reports of performances of Bachian fugues by the
Albrechtsberger plays a further role in the present discussion because most talented organists and pianist in late eighteenth-century Vienna,
a source in his hand, long believed to be lost but actually preserved in the Imperial capital was unique among European musical centers of
the Nydahl collection in Stockholm, contains one prelude and sixteen the time.
fugues from The Well-Tempered Clavier, Book Two. This manuscript
is dated July 1778, however, long after Albrechtsberger’s departure A Difficult Repertory Enjoyed by General Audiences
from Melk. It is clear at any rate that Albrechtsberger held the fugues
of J. S. Bach in high esteem and even used some of them as examples in It would seem that performances of fugues were generally directed
his treatise on composition of 1790. In that same year, he is also known toward the connoisseur rather than the amateur or professional. That
to have tested a new organ with his own compositions, as well as those none of the many professional or semi-professional female pianists
of Bach, Haydn, and Florian Gassmann.17 have been mentioned in the contemporary accounts leads to the same
conclusion. Mozart’s letter of March 24, 1782, suggests, however, that
The little-known Lipawsky (1772-1813) was also recognized in his day general audiences did, in fact, appreciate fugues. After mentioning that
as one well acquainted with the fugues of Bach. According to Stadler, Emperor Joseph II was an admirer of the form, Mozart reported that his
Lipawsky “was one of the most accomplished players of keyboard concerts received the greatest applause when he programmed a prelude
instruments, who performed the most difficult Bachian fugues from and fugue and some of his variations because the pieces “are nicely
memory and with the utmost precision; he knew how to bring out the set-off one from the other” and because “everybody finds something
theme in a special way whenever it entered in one of the voices.”18 according to his or her musical taste.” If Mozart’s impression was
correct, perhaps the performance of Bachian fugues by only the best
Even younger than Lipawsky was Franz Xaver Mozart, born just a pianists and organists reflected more the difficulties of execution than
few months before his father’s death in December 1791. Johann Baptist the general acceptance of these works. In referring to the stupendous
Gänsbacher, who first met Mozart’s son in the home of Baron van keyboards skill of the young Beethoven, Neefe acknowledged the
Swieten shortly before the Baron’s death in 1803, reported that the boy difficulty of the repertoire, praising the “48” as “almost the non plus
played fugues by Bach (among others), transposing them at sight into ultra” of keyboard composition.23
any key.19
Before moving on to Mozart himself, Beethoven should be briefly Fugues Arranged for String Instruments
mentioned as one who is known to have played “major portions” of
The Well-Tempered Clavier at the age of thirteen, while a student The broad appeal of fugal compositions is seen further in the considerable
of Christian Gottlob Neefe’s in Bonn. Somewhat later, in his early number of keyboard fugues arranged for string instruments, as indicated
Viennese years, Beethoven participated in performances at van Swieten’s in Table 4. These arrangements transported a technically demanding
residence. Anton Schindler reported that Beethoven not only became repertory into the realm of the trained amateur.
acquainted with the music of Handel, Bach, and Italian composers up
to Palestrina at van Swieten’s, but The unknown identity of the arranger of many of these pieces is of
little consequence here. Clearly Mozart had a hand in some of them, as
revealed by the autograph score to several fragmentary arrangements
had to stay there longer then anyone else because
and to the five fugues that constitute K. 405 (see Table 4). Beethoven
the old man was musically insatiable. Consequently,
also started similar arrangements, though apparently did not finish a
it was always late into the night before Beethoven
single one. And the fact that a Handel fugue with a newly composed
was allowed to leave (if he was allowed to leave at
introduction was attributed to Gassmann, until Warren Kirkendale
all) since he still had to play half a dozen fugues by
made the correct attribution, attests to the fact that lesser names
Bach, even after everything that had been heard, as a
were also active as arrangers. The addition of an introduction to an
good night blessing.20
existing fugue occurred with some frequency. Composing a prelude-
like movement was less daunting than composing a fugue because
If van Swieten started his music sessions in the 1790s at noon, as he had
the existing preludes, which served as models, have fewer obbligato
in the early 1780s, Beethoven literally spent the entire day with him and
voices than the accompanying fugues and do not adhere to strict part-
his musical treasures.
writing.
The source situation surrounding Mozart’s Bach encounter is
Fugues for instrumental ensembles were not new, however. They
particularly favorable, and many of the facts are commonly known and
were firmly rooted in local compositional practice and frequently
need not be repeated here. In quoting Mozart’s letter above concerning
found in Baroque chamber music. Kirkendale offers an extensive list
“all the works by Handel and Bach” that van Swieten had loaned him,
of instrumental fugues by Viennese composers such as Gregor Joseph
an important qualifier was omitted. Mozart indicated more specifically
Werner, Franz Tu T ma, Wagenseil, Georg Matthias Monn, and Wenzel
that he received these works from the Baron “only after I had played
Raimund Birck—all born before 1720. Although the Baroque keyboard
them through for him.” Thomas Attwood, who received lessons in
partita totally vanished soon after 1750—with the notable exception of
composition from Mozart from 1785 to 1787, revealed even more about
Mozart’s unfinished Suite in C, K. 399—the instrumental fugue, often
his teacher’s involvement with Bach’s music: “Mozart was so fond of
preceded by a slow introduction to form a sonata da chiesa, continued
to be composed. The most prolific composer of such works appears to 6Joseph Edler von Schönfeld, Jahrbuch der Tonkunst ffür Wien und
have been Albrechtsberger, who set numerous fugues in two, three, four, Prag ffür das Jahr 1796, Faksimile-Nachdruck der Ausgabe Wien
five, six, and eight instrumental voices. Many of these fugues are also 1796, mit Nachwort und Register von Otto Biba (Munich and
transmitted for keyboard. Perhaps these are the original sources that, Salzburg: Katzbichler, 1976), 79-80.
like Bach’s keyboard fugues, served as the basis for later instrumental 7Yo Tomita, “Bach Reception in Pre-Classical Vienna: Baron van
arrangements. Swieten’s Circle Edits the ‘Well-Tempered Clavier’ II,” Music &
Letters, 81, no. 3 (2000): 364-91 and “The Sources of J. S. Bach’s
Well-Tempered Clavier II in Vienna 1777-1801,” Bach 29 no. 2 (Fall-
The Earliest Reception Winter 1998), 8-79.
8Theodor Aigner, Thematisches Verzeichnis der Werke von Johann
At present it is difficult to determine exactly when a particular fugue by Mederitsch detto Gallus (Munich: Katzbichler, 1974).
a member of the Bach family first made its appearance in Vienna.24 It 9For information on Mederitsch copies located outside Salzburg, see
is somewhat peculiar that almost no original sources to these Viennese the Göttinger Bach-Datenbank, available online at www.bach.gwdg.
copies have been identified. Original sources exist to copies of C. P. E. de.
Bach’s music, but these do not contain his fugal compositions. These 10Alexander Weinmann, ed., Johann Traeg. Die
copies also originated in Hamburg—that is, after 1768—and according Musikalienverzeichnisse von 1799 und 1804 (Vienna: Universal
to the handwriting of the copyists probably not before the 1780s. Edition, 1973).
11Arno Forchert, “‘Die Hauptstadt von Sebastian Bach’: Berliner
From a study undertaken by Hannelore Gericke in the 1970s, we know Bach-Traditionen zwischen Klassik und Romantik,” Jahrbuch des
that music prints from Berlin, Leipzig, and Norimberg were readily Staatlichen Instituts ffür Musikforschung—Preu
Musikforschung—Preußischer Kulturbesitz
available in Vienna within a year or two of their release, even during (1995): 9-28.
the Seven Years’ War between Prussia and Austria from 1756 to 1763.25 12This section draws on Biba, “Mozart und die ‘Alte-Musik’-Szene
These prints, however, represent only a fraction of the music available in Wien,” Warren Kirkendale, Fuge und Fugato in der Kammermusik
in manuscript form in the 1780s and 1790s and therefore cannot des Rokoko und der Klassik (Tutzing: Schneider, 1966), and
be regarded as a principle source of the repertoire. It was not until Karl Wagner, ed., Abbé Maximilian Stadler: seine “Materialien
around 1780 that several people who reportedly owned works by the zur Geschichte der Musik unter den österreichischen Regenten,”
Bach family settled in Vienna: Fanny Arnstein, née Itzig, in 1776, the Schriftenreihe der Internationalen Stiftung Mozarteum 6 (Kassel:
ubiquituous Baron van Swieten in 1777, Karl Alois Lichnowsky after Bärenreiter, 1974).
1782. Many music lovers may have had Bachian fugues in their baggage, 13Johann Baptist Schenk, “Autobiographische Skizze,” Studien zur
but this cannot be verified. With few exceptions it appears the fugues Musikwissenschaft 11 (1924): 75-85; cf. Kirkendale, Fuge und Fugato,
of the Bach family crossed the Austrian borders fairly late, but then 62.
rapidly developed a life of their own. Mozart’s often-cited enthusiasm 14Aigner, Thematisches Verzeichnis der Werke von Johann
for the fugues of Bach and Handel must therefore be seen as documenting Mederitsch detto Gallus, XV.
a broad-based Viennese “Bach discovery” around 1780. The fashion 15Wagner, ed., Abbé Maximilian Stadler, 102.
for these works, however, would not have been possible if the Bachian 16Ignaz Ritter von Seyfried, ed., J. G. Albrechtsberger’s sämmtliche
fugues had not fallen upon fertile soil in Vienna. Schriften über
ber Generalba
Generalbaß ß,, Harmonie-Lehre, und Tonsetzkunst;
ß
zum Selbstunterrichte (Vienna: Anton Strauss [c. 1830]), 3: 211.
17Otto Erich Deutsch, Mozart: Die Dokumente seines Lebens
(Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1961), 324; cf. Kirkendale, Fuge und Fugato,
67.
18Wagner, ed., Abbé Maximilian Stadler, 123.
19Deutsch, Mozart: Die Dokumente, 473; cf. Kirkendale (who,
*This essay is an abbreviated version of a paper read at the biennial
however, confuses father and son), Fuge und Fugato,
Fugato, 201.
meeting of the American Bach Society in Leipzig, May 2006. It 20Anton Schindler, Ludwig van Beethoven, 3rd ed. (Münster:
is dedicated to Otto Biba, Vienna, in lieu of a contribution to his
Aschendorff, 1860), 1:20; quoted in Kirkendale, Fuge und Fugato,
Festschrift, on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday.
1Michelle Rasmussen, “Bach, Mozart, and the ‘Musical Midwife,’” The 252.
21Cliff Eisen, ed., Mozart: Die Dokumente seines Lebens. Addenda.
New Federalist August 6, 2001; available online at www.schillerinstitut.
(Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1997), 90.
dk/bach.html. 22Georg Nikolaus von Nissen, Biographie W. A. Mozart’s (Leipzig:
2For Mozart’s letters, see Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Mozart Briefe
Breitkopf und Härtel, 1828), 655.
und Aufzeichnungen, ed. Internationale Stiftung Mozarteum (Kassel: 23Kirkendale, Fuge und Fugato, 252; quoting Neefe from Magazin
Bärenreiter, 1962). All translations are by the author.
3Otto Biba, “Mozart und die ‘Alte-Musik’-Szene in Wien,” in Mozart: der Musik 1 (Hamburg, 1783): 394.
24During the discussion that followed the presentation of this paper
Experiment Aufkl
Aufklärung im Wien des ausgehenden 18. Jahrhundert
Jahrhundert,
at the Leipzig conference, Christoph Wolff pointed out that the sons
Essayband zur Mozart-Ausstellung, ed. Herbert Lachmayer (Ostfildern:
of Habsburgian nobility who attended Leipzig University in the
Hantje Cantz, 2006), 457-66.
4The version of this paper delivered in Leipzig also contained a section 1720s and 1730s and returned to Vienna might have been among the
earliest Viennese owners of music of the Bach family.
on Bachian fugues that appeared in theoretical writings of the time. 25Hannelore Gericke, Der Wiener Musikalienhandel von 1770-1778
5Portions of the von Hess collection were identified by Uwe Wolf
(Graz: H. Boehlaus Nachf.,1960).
a decade ago; see Wolf, “Die Musikaliensammlung des Wiener
Regierungsrats Franz Joseph Reichsritter von Heß (1739-1804) und
ihre Bachiana,” in Bach-Jahrbuch 81 (1995): 195-201.
In “The Baroque upbeat: outline of its typology and evolution,” Ido Kan’s essay is nicely complemented by Gregory Butler’s “The prelude
Abravaya focuses on two types of Baroque upbeats, both of which to the third English Suite BWV 808: an allegro concerto movement in
were abandoned by the beginning of the Classical era. The first is the ritornello form” in which he offers a fascinating hypothesis concern-
extended upbeat (or fore-beat), which occurs rarely in the works of ing Bach’s mastering of concerto writing. Butler cautiously narrows
Bach and Handel, though is found in great variety in the eighteenth- the date of composition of BWV 808/1 to between 1715 and 1717
century French repertory, such as Couperin’s Pièces de clavecin. “The based on stylistic and formal comparisons with many pieces, especially
apparent reason for this is that phrases with long upbeats tend to the second movement of the Fifth Brandenburg Concerto. He then
be end-accented. . . . For Couperin and other French composers of suggests that BWV 808/1 could be a compositional stepping-stone
his time, end-accented phrases are, perhaps in analogy to the French between Bach’s keyboard transcriptions of Vivaldi’s opp. 3 and 4 (c.
language, most natural and obvious.” (p. 19) A piece that utilizes the 1713—1714) and his first newly composed orchestral concertos in the
second type of upbeat, the after-beat, begins with a short rest, and Vivaldian style. This would be a very logical progression, but until
although this opening may appear similar to an extended upbeat, it has the chronology of Bach’s concertos and movements in concerto form
its own metric and rhythmic weight. Abravaya convincingly demon- is more firmly established, it will not be possible to determine whether
strates that consideration of the upbeat may inform our analysis. In or not Butler’s supposition is correct.
a brief discussion of Bach’s Sinfonia in E-flat Major (BWV 791), for
example, he finds “a remarkable achievement in style unification, in the Don Franklin’s groundbreaking research on tempo and temporal
spirit of Les Gouts reunis,” as Bach added “an Italianate basso ostinato designs in Bach’s music promises to greatly impact the performance
with a Germanized after-beat before the French rhythm of the upper of Baroque music. His present essay, “Composing in time: Bach’s
voices.” (pp. 27-8) temporal design for the Goldberg Variations,” extends his study of
temporal procedures in Bach’s 1733 Missa to this later set of varia-
Harry White’s paper, “Johann Joseph Fux and the question of Einbau tions.1 Franklin begins by summarizing Kirnberger’s contemporary
technique,” elucidates the originality of Bach’s compositional approach account, explaining that “each time signature is associated . . . with
to da capo and dal segno arias by exploring similar vocal writing in a particular set of note values (Notengattung), which, when read in
Fux’s oratorios. He discovers that Einbau techinique, the process conjunction with the time signature, convey its tempo giusto, that is,
through which the opening ritornello attains meaning only after its its basic, or conventional, tempo.” Further, according to Kirnberger,
texture is completed by the incorporation of the vocal line, is found “a composer may . . . modify the note values traditionally associated
not just in Bach’s arias, but in Fux’s as well. He finds further that with a signature’s tempo giusto, thereby effecting a change in tempo.”
Fux’s arias are constrained by the conventional form of the da capo (p. 105) Franklin suggests that around 1714 Bach created his own
aria in a way that Bach’s are not. The da capo structure “is a resource “Bachian” tempo giustos by using a different primary note value with
in Bach’s musical imagination . . . which is constantly vulnerable to the a particular time signature than the note value indicated by Kirnberger.
expressive claim of other resources, notably in his case the chorale and He goes on to explain that a fermata between successive movements
the vast enterprise of Bach’s choral and instrumental counterpoint.” (p. indicates that the pulse or beat is replaced by a new beat, and thus a
47) White poses a fascinating question (whose answer will largely be new tempo. Franklin has devised three terms to describe important
speculative): to what extent is the freedom found in Bach’s arias due to temporal relationships: (1) “Temporal structure” is the ratio of tempo-
the composer’s imagination, and to what extent does it reflect Lutheran ral units (marked off by fermatas) to the total number of movements,
pragmatism (as opposed to the political and religious absolutism of (2) “Proportion” is the ratio of the beat (or pulse) of one movement
Vienna)? to the beat of the following movement (in the same temporal unit),
(3) “Dimension” is the ratio of the duration of two successive move-
Just as the Leipzig liturgical calendar has been crucial in establishing ments, measured in beats. He continues in this essay by exploring the
the chronology of Bach’s cantatas, the more complete liturgical calen- relationships between successive movements in each temporal unit of
dar and list of gala days established by Janice Stockigt in “The royal the Goldberg Variations. It is clear that the temporal designs inherent
Polish and electoral Saxon court and state calendars, 1728—1750,” in this work are quite complex and do not coincide neatly with the
makes it possible to establish a more accurate chronology of the pattern of canons at increasing step-wise intervals found in every third
sacred works of Heinichen, Zelenka, Hasse, and others. Stockigt dem- variation. These designs may not be obvious and straightforward—but
onstrates the usefulness of this information by pinpointing the first when did Bach ever limit himself to ideas that were?
In “Eschatology, theology and music: death and beyond in Bach’s In “Bach performance practice in the twentieth century: recordings,
vocal music,” Robin Leaver refutes the widespread notion that “for reviews and reception,” Dorottya Fabian begins “to address the issue
Bach eschatology meant a preoccupation with death and dying.” (p. of style (‘romantic’ versus ‘historical’) and to determine the dimensions
130) Even though death had been present in German Baroque art and that underlie the listeners’ perception of Baroque music. . . .” (p. 185)
literature since the Thirty Years’ War, and Bach himself was personally She designed a study in which more than fifty participants evaluated
surrounded by death throughout his life, Leaver argues persuasively five recordings of two excerpts from the Brandenburg Concertos with
that the picture of Bach as preoccupied with morbidity is one-sided respect to forty supplied descriptors such as “clear structure” and
and inaccurate. Many of his cantatas center on death, to be sure, but “expressive.” She found that there are two strong dimensions affecting
that is usually because they elaborate upon the Gospel of the day. And the listeners’ perception of the music, one associated with stylishness
death for Bach (as for Luther) was intertwined with hope, faith, and and the other with expressive content: “we tentatively concluded that
even triumphant victory: through death one meets God and through the stylish performance is judged primarily according to articulation
death Jesus completed his work. By examining vocal works that and speech-like-ness. An expressive performance is judged primarily
Bach composed for transitional points in the liturgical year, as well according to its romantic and unmechanical qualities.” (p. 186) In a
as the motet Lieber Herr Gott composed by Sebastian’s uncle Johann second study designed to measure the impact of articulation on the
Christoph, which Christoph Wolff theorizes Bach was preparing perception of dotted-ness, two measures of variation seven of the
for his own funeral, Leaver reveals that Bach’s settings of librettos Goldberg Variations were played for the test subjects with a variety of
concerning death often express eschatological joy—the joy surround- articulations. Fabian found that articulation had a significant effect on
ing the coming of Christ and the knowledge that death leads to the the perceived dotted-ness of a performance, so the ratio of dotting is
afterlife. hardly the only factor contributing to the perception of dotted-ness.
J. Drew Stephen’s contribution, “Bach’s horn parts: alternatives to John Butt’s stimulating paper, “Bach in the twenty-first century:
nodal venting and hand stopping,” tackles the thorny question of how re-evaluating him from the perspective of performance,” defends
Baroque trumpeters and horn players, whose instruments were capable historical performance practices against the impassioned critiques of
of playing only notes of the harmonic series, played written f and a, Theodor Adorno. Butt contends that hermeneutics and research of a
whose corresponding harmonics—the eleventh and thirteenth—are speculative nature can play a valuable role in contemporary scholarship
out of tune in relation to standard systems of temperament. After dem- by complementing the positivist research that has formed the core of
onstrating that the two techniques noted in the title of his essay were Bach studies since the middle of the twentieth century. He counters
little used, if at all, before the second half of the eighteenth century, Adorno’s assertion that “mechanically squeaking continuo-instru-
Stephen suggests two ways in which Bach’s contemporaries might have ments and wretched school choirs contribute not to sacred sobriety
rendered these notes. To begin with, they might simply have played but to malicious failure” with examples in which meaning in Bach’s
them as they sounded on the instrument. The audience, to whom the works is revealed only through performances involving the original
use of brass instruments in art music was a novelty, might have simply performing forces. He points, for example, to instances in which viola
accepted a system of tuning specific to those instruments, especially da gamba and vocal parts seem to convey the sense of difficulty and
since many listeners would have been accustomed to the “out-of tune” human imperfection expressed in the text. Historical performance and
notes heard on horns in their traditional venue, the hunt. The second investigations into the theology and meaning of Bach’s works contrib-
approach, the one he believes was used most frequently, is bending (or ute to a greater understanding of Bach’s style and the creative process.
lipping) the notes. In addition to documentary evidence, he cites physi-
cal evidence from early brass instruments to demonstrate that Baroque In “Bach’s Credo in England: an early history,” Yo Tomita proposes
players must have been quite skilled at this technique. Stephen ends some fascinating transmission scenarios. His careful review of the
by making the very important point that the use of anachronistic tech- sources reveals that all the early copies of the Credo in England derive
niques is not difficult to countenance if these techniques help today’s from one source, which was owned by Charles Burney. He suggests
performers achieve what should be their primary goal—the creation of that Burney’s copy came to him either from the Royal family, after this
an expressive and authentic sound. source had been used to make a fair copy for the Queen (c. 1789), or
from Emanuel Bach in the 1770s or 1780s, in which case Burney him-
In “Bach in North America during the shellac era (1900—50): early self would have had a fair copy made for the Queen. Tomita favors the
sound documents of art and commerce,” Martin Elste surveys sev- second scenario and suggests that Burney’s derogatory remarks about
eral recordings from the first half of the twentieth century and dis- Bach’s style may have led him to give a copy of the Credo to the Queen,
tinguishes between those that document an old-fashioned, romantic as an apology, thereby spreading Bach’s popularity in England.
tradition of performing Bach and those that document an emerging,
modernist style that would lead to historically informed performances By showing how much longer it took for Bach’s vocal works to gain a
in the second half of the century. His selection of recordings seems foothold in Ireland than in England, Barra Boydell’s essay, “’This most
rather arbitrary: three recordings of the St. Matthew Passion (the 1937 crabbed of all earthly music’: the performance and reception of Bach’s
recording by Koussevitzky with the B.S.O. was released on 27 discs!), vocal music in Dublin in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries,”
two recordings of The Art of Fugue, a single recording of two trio makes a great counterpart to Tomita’s. It was not until 1847 that a
sonatas by the organist Carl Weinrich. His work is promising, but public performance of what was believed to be a Bach vocal composi-
will be more illuminating when a larger, more coherent repertoire is tion was attempted in Ireland (it turns out that the motet performed
examined. Elste includes a very interesting appendix that lists the first was actually written by Bach’s friend Georg Gottfried Wagner). The
Bach performances on American labels or by American musicians from “Crucifixus” from the Mass in B Minor was not performed until 1865,
1909 to 1977. and a complete vocal work by Bach was not performed in Dublin until
1874 (the entire Mass in B Minor was not performed until 1908!).
Boydell shows that the old stereotypes of Bach’s music as unvocal, Johann Sebastian Bachs sowie ihrer Familien: Eine Datenliste.” While
intellectual but unemotional, and overly complex—all views that can some of the intersections between the two families are well-known
be traced back to Scheibe’s famous attack—remained common in (Telemann serving as godfather to C.P.E. Bach in 1714, J. S. Bach per-
Irish reviews through the late nineteenth century. His account of forming Telemann’s music and subscribing to his Nouveaux Quatuors
how differently Bach was viewed in the early twentieth century (the of 1738, and C.P.E. Bach succeeding the late Telemann in Hamburg
Irish Times reported in 1908 that “The genius of Bach is accepted by in 1768), the annotated list provided here offers a concise summary of
everyone”) attests to the powerful draw of Bach’s music—once it was direct and indirect contacts between the two families extending from
actually performed. the 1690s to the 1790 print of C.P.E. Bach’s Nachlaß
Nachla , which lists works
of Telemann in Emanuel’s possession at his death.
The final entry, Hans-Joachim Schulze’s “Bach at the turn of the
twenty-first century,” reviews the current state of Bach scholarship In “Telemanns ‘Sonnet auf weyland Herrn Capellmeister Bach,’”
and performance, and offers correctives to several potentially danger- Jürgen Rathje finds Telemann’s memorial sonnet to be an example of
ous trends. First and foremost, Schulze warns against idle speculation. “gelehrte Poesie” that demonstrates the composer’s familiarity with
Noting the relatively small body of primary documents pertaining to Latin and Greek sources. In addition, he stresses that the impetus for
Bach’s life, he bemoans certain (unnamed) authors who exploit gaps in the work came in the form of a letter from the Dresden Kapellmeister
the historical record in order to promote fanciful hypotheses. Without Pisendel, who pointed out that Bach’s passing was one of three recent
proper intellectual rigor, Bach can be seen at the summit of every deaths of members of Mizler’s “Correspondierende Societät der musi-
field—“as a theologian, mathematician, philosopher, physicist, rhetori- kalischen Wissenschaften.”
cian, politician (and whatever one wishes beyond this).” (p. 248) Soon,
the monument we have created to Bach will make it very difficult to Joachim Kremer discusses Romain Rolland’s Telemann biography
find any fault with the master at all. Schulze is equally wary of recon- (“Johann Sebastian Bach und sein ‘glücklicher Rivale’: Zu Romain
structed works and of numerology: “Not even the simplest number Rollands Telemannbild”), showing that Rolland, in seeing Telemann as
allegory can be shown to have a sound basis—at least in the work of a progressive, Francophile, and crucial composer of the modern style
Bach.” (p. 255) His warnings need to be heeded as Bach scholarship in the first half of the eighteenth century, was reacting in part to Spitta’s
enters a new millennium. comparison of the putative Neumeister settings of Bach and Telemann
(replete, of course, with incorrect attributions) in which Telemann fares
Evan Scooler poorly.
1Don O. Franklin, “Aspekte von Proportion und Dimension in Johann Of most interest to Bach scholars and aficionados will be the series of
articles comparing the ways in which the two composers approached
Sebastian Bachs Missa von 1733,” Leipziger Beitr
Beiträge zur Bachforschung the sacred cantata. Ute Poetzsch-Seban, in her article “Bach und
5, ed. Ulrich Leisinger (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2002), 235-72. Neumeister—Bach und Telemann,” provides an invaluable overview
of the Bach and Telemann settings of Neumeister cantata libretti. One
of the puzzling aspects of Bach’s cantata oeuvre is that he set so few
Telemann und Bach/Telemann Beitr äge, edited by Brit Reipsch and
Beiträäge (only five) Neumeister texts, while other composers set large num-
Wolf Hobohm. Magdeburger Telemann-Studien XVIII. Hildesheim: bers, including complete cycles. Chief among these was Telemann,
Georg Olms Verlag, 2005. 286 pp. 58 Eur. (hardback) who worked professionally with Neumeister in Sorau and Hamburg
and set five of his cycles. Bach set one cantata, Gleich wie der Regen
One of the difficulties in assessing Bach’s oeuvre of church music has und Schnee, BWV 18, from Neumeister’s first cycle, Geistliches
been the relative inaccessibility of much of the repertoire of his contem- Singen und Spielen of 1711, and four (three completely and one par-
poraries. His cantata output in particular has been studied for the most tially) from the second cycle, which Neumeister wrote for Telemann.
part in isolation, without the context provided by a close study of the Telemann set this second Neumeister cycle in the French style, creat-
works of his nearest fellow composers. As part of its ongoing series of ing the “Französischer” Jahrgang of 1714-15, which was performed
Telemann-Studien, the Zentrum ffür Telemann-Pflege und -Forschung, in Frankfurt and Eisenach concurrently. Bach likewise began his first
Magdeburg, has issued a volume divided into two large sections. The setting from this cycle, Nun komm der Heiden Heiland, BWV 61, in
first treats the relationship between Bach and his most crucial German the French style. Poetszch-Seban offers the reasonable conjecture that
contemporary, Georg Philipp Telemann, and the second provides Bach and Telemann communicated with each other regarding their set-
a series of more specialized studies of Telemann’s music. Only the tings of this text and that Telemann’s Francophile approach also infil-
first section concerns us here, but the reader’s attention is directed to trates Bach’s later settings from this cycle. Thus, Bach’s involvement
Jürgen
rgen Neubacher’s article “Zur AuffAufführung von Telemanns ‘Engel- with Neumeister texts may have had as much to do with his interest in
Jahrgang’ und zu Zensurbestrebungen ffür kirchenmusikalische Texte Telemann’s music as in Neumeister’s poetry.
in Hamburg” in the second half of the volume. This essay provides
additional information on one of Telemann’s most important later Brit Reipsch turns to another of Bach’s cantata librettists in
Hamburg cycles, one that post-dates Bach’s cantatas and is virtually “Annotationen zu Georg Philipp Telemann, Johann Friedrich Helbig
unknown to non-Telemann specialists. The Telemann/Bach essays und Johann Sebastian Bach.” She suggests that Telemannn’s setting of
were planned and offered as a tribute to Hans-Joachim Schulze on the Helbig’s 1720 cycle, known as the “Sicilianischer” Jahrgang because of
occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday. its simple, dance-like Italian style, influenced Bach’s setting of Wer sich
erhöhet, der soll erniedriget werden, BWV 47, whose text is from the
The volume opens with an essay by Wolf Hobohm entitled same source. More specifically, Reipsch expands upon Dürr’s sugges-
“Berühungspunkte in den Biographien Georg Philipp Telemanns und tion that BWV 47 was inspired by Telemann’s setting of this same text,
Dr Yo Tomita ([email protected])
International Symposium on Bach’s B-minor Mass
School of Music & Sonic Arts
Music Building
Queen’s University Belfast
Belfast, BT7 1NN
The Society for Eighteenth-Century Music provides a forum
Northern Ireland
where scholars and performers can further their knowledge of
music, history, and interrelated arts of the period, and serves as a For more information, contact Dr. Tomita or visit www.music.
resource to facilitate and encourage collaboration. For more infor- qub.ac.uk/tomita/bachbib/conferences/Belfast-Nov2007/
mation, visit www.secm.org.
Every two years, the Society honors a publication or publications of exceptional merit on Bach or figures in his circle by a Society member in the
early stages of his or her career. The William H. Scheide Prize, awarded for an outstanding book, article, or edition that appeared in the previous
two calendar years, is possible because of the generosity of William Scheide.
This year’s committee, which consisted of Matthew Dirst, Mary Dalton Greer, and Jeanne Swack, awarded the prize to both Mark Peters for his
article, “A Reconsideration of Bach’s Role as Text Redactor in the Ziegler Cantatas,” in BACH 36, no. 1 (2005) and Andrew Talle for his article,
“Nürnberg, Darmstadt, Köthen — Neuerkenntnisse zur Bach-Überlieferung in der ersten Hälfte des 18. Jahrhunderts,” in Bach-Jahrbuch 89
(2003).
Mark Peters earned his Ph.D. in historical musicology at the University Andrew Talle received undergraduate degrees in cello performance
of Pittsburgh in 2003 with a dissertation on Mariane von Ziegler’s and linguistics from Northwestern University before earning a Ph.D.
sacred cantata texts and their settings by J. S. Bach. He has presented in historical musicology from Harvard University in 2003. His dis-
conference papers on Bach, Ziegler, and Johannes Brahms, and his pub- sertation, advised by Christoph Wolff, establishes a social and musical
lications include articles in BACH and the monograph Claude Debussy context for Bach’s printed Keyboard Partitas (BWV 825-830). He has
As I Knew Him and Other Writings of Arthur Hartmann (University given papers at several national and international conferences and he is
of Rochester Press, 2003), with Samuel Hsu and Sidney Grolnic. He is currently revising his dissertation for publication. Talle teaches music
currently completing A Woman’s Voice in Baroque Music: Mariane von history at The Peabody Conservatory and Johns Hopkins University
Ziegler’s Sacred Cantata Texts and Their Settings by J. S. Bach to be in Baltimore, Maryland.
published by Ashgate Publishing in 2007. Peters is assistant professor
of music at Trinity Christian College in Palos Heights, Illinois.
Applications should include a research proposal of no more than three double-spaced pages, along with a curriculum vitae and budget, all
in English. The committee will favor proposals that include concrete statements of (1) the materials to be consulted—specific scores, books,
instruments, etc.—if research in libraries or archives is proposed; (2) the itinerary and why it is necessary to examine sources on-site, if travel
is involved; and (3) the nature of the ultimate outcome of the research (book, article, edition, etc.). Grants will be awarded in odd-numbered
years. To apply, please send your proposal and budget by January 5, 5, 2007
200 to [email protected].
Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: The Complete Works is an editorial and publishing project of the Packard Humanities Institute, in cooperation
with the Bach-Archiv Leipzig, the Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, and Harvard University. Its goal is to make available,
in both printed and digital formats, a critical edition of the composer’s works. Nine volumes are currently available at www.cpebach.org:
I/3: “Probestücke,” “Leichte” und Damen” Sonatas, edited by III/5: Oboe Concertos, edited by Janet Page
David Schulenberg
I/8.1, 8.2: Miscellaneous Keyboard Music I and II, edited by Peter Wollny III/8: Sei concerti per il cembalo concertato, edited by Douglas Lee
III/2: Six Symphonies for Baron von Swieten, edited by Sarah Adams IV/5.1: Passion according to St. Mark (1770), edited by Uwe Wolf
III/3: Orchester-Sinfonien mit zwölf obligaten Stimmen, edited V/5.1: Works for Special Occasions I, edited by Ulrich Leisinger
by David Kidger
“Von Bach zu Mozart” Koopman’s delicate and artful phrasing in the slow movement of the Overture in
D Major (BWV 1068). I was completely overwhelmed by the totally convincing
Bachfest Leipzig 2006 performances of Ophélie Gaillard, who played three unaccompanied Cello
Suites (BWV 1007-1009), and Jana Semerádová (transverse flute), who per-
formed the Overture in B Minor (BWV 1067) with Musica Aeterna Bratislava.
In honor of the 250th anniversary of Mozart’s birth, the world’s largest and These are the rising stars, and I am sure we will hear more from them in the
most prestigious Bach festival took as its theme “From Bach to Mozart.” The years to come.
ten-day festival consisted of about fifty concerts, including nine organ concerts/
tours in the neighboring towns, daily worship services featuring Bach’s cantatas Unfortunately, however, there were more concerts at which I was disappointed
and motets in context, as well as museum exhibitions and four musicological than thrilled. Some musicians were unable to offer satisfactory performances
lectures by scholars from the Bach-Archiv Leipzig. due simply to lack of preparation. Others, however, faced acoustical problems,
particularly at the Nikolaikirche, which they could have managed better if they
Although the performances included works by Bach’s sons and their had rehearsed more carefully.
contemporaries, the music of Bach and Mozart was naturally featured. Mozart’s
compositions, in fact, received even more performances than I had expected. “From Monteverdi to Bach” will be the theme of Bachfest Leipzig 2007,
His music could be heard everyday, beginning with the opening concert which will begin on June 7th. The featured guest artists will include Nikolaus
performance of the Mass in C Minor (K 427), in the version recently completed Harnoncourt, with the Arnold Schoenberg Chor and Concentus Musicus Wien
by Robert Levin. Roderich Kreile lead an impassioned performance with the in an exploration of Bach’s early cantatas; Sir John Eliot Gardiner, with the
participation of the Dresdner Kreuzchor and Batzdorfer Hofkapelle. Monteverdi Choir performing compositions from the “Altbachisches Archiv”;
Peter Seymour, with the Yorkshire Baroque Soloists presenting the works of
One took special note of performances of works by Mozart that connect the Purcell and Blow; and Gerhard Schmidt-Gaden, with the Tölzer Knabenchor
two composers. For example, two different concerts featured performances and Concerto Köln concluding the festival with a performance of the Mass in
of the string arrangements of Bach’s three-part fugues commonly attributed B Minor. For more information, visit the Bach-Archiv Leipzig website at
to Mozart (K 404a) but probably by Albrechtsberger. There were also http://www.bach-leipzig.de.
performances, however, of Mozart’s operas Die Entf
Entführung aus dem Serail (K
384) and Bastien und Bastienne (K 50) that appear to have little connection with Yo Tomita
Bach. Conspicuously missing was a performance of Singet dem Herrn ein neues
Lied (BWV 225), which Mozart reportedly heard in Leipzig in 1789.
Performing on period instruments, Publick Musick Orchestra George Ritchie’s recording of the complete organ works of J.
and Choir, lead by Thomas Folan, has just released a recording S. Bach, performed on nine historically-inspired American pipe
of Bach’s Missae Breves, BWV 233-236. This CD is available at organs, has been released as an eleven-CD set on the Raven label
www.musicaomnia.org (Cat. # 0203). (Raven OAR-875). The registration for each work is included as
well as photographs and stoplists of each organ. Included with
Carolina Baroque, under the leadership of Dale Higbee, opened the set are six essays by George Stauffer on the musical style
its nineteenth season in October with “Handel at the Opera and milieu. Ritchie is professor emeritus and retired head of the
House.” The season is rounded out by two subsequent con- organ department at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln. This
certs entitled “18th Century Genius: Bach, Handel & Mozart” set is available at RavenCD.com, through the Organ Historical
and “Handel in Italy.” For more information on the upcoming Society, and at record stores.
season as well as Carolina Baroque’s latest recording, “Music’s
Golden Age: Bach, Handel & Mozart,” visit www.carolinaba- For a dozen years Curt Sather has played a recital at St. Barn-
roque.org. abas Episcopal Church in Scottsdale, Arizona, to celebrate J. S.
Bach’s birthday. On March 21, 2006, in commemoration of the
Jan-Piet Knijff acted as consultant for the recent renovation of composer’s 321st birtday, Sather played Bach’s complete organ
the Maynard-Walker Memorial Organ at the Aaron Copland works on a twenty-three-hour marathon recital. Over 500 peo-
School of Music, Queens College/CUNY, where he is college ple visited the church throughout the day to listen to the pro-
Directions to Contributors
ontributors Christoph Henzel (Rostock/Berlin), Vogler – Zelter – Bach. Zu einem au-
tographen Brieffragment Carl Philipp Emanuel Bachs
Besprechungen
Bach Notes is published twice yearly (Spring
Spring and Fall and
mailed to all members and subscribers. Submissions for the Vom Klang der Zeit. Besetzung, Bearbeitung und Aufführungspraxis bei
Johann Sebastian Bach. Klaus Hofmann zum 65. Geburtstag, hrsg. von Ul-
Spring
pring 2007 issue are due by January 31, 2007, and should be
rich Bartels und Uwe Wolf, Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Härtel, 2004. 199 S.
in Microsoft Word, employ endnotes, and follow the stylistic (Markus Rathey, New Haven, CT)
guidelines of The Chicago Manual of Style (15th ed.). Email
submissions (much preferred) should be sent to bachnotes@ Lucia Haselböck, Bach Textlexikon. Ein Wörterbuch der religiösen Sprach-
bilder im Vokalwerk von Johann Sebastian Bach, Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2004.
americanbachsociety.org and submissions on compact disc
225 S. (Markus Rathey, New Haven, CT)
(CD), with hard copy, may be mailed to Reginald L. Sanders,
Department of Music, Kenyon College, Gambier, OH 43022. Neue Bach-Gesellschaft e.V. Leipzig
Mitglieder der leitenden Gremien
along with the entire northeast, was engulfed in ice and all
Alfred Mann (1917-2006) airports were closed, preventing Board members from attend-
ing the event. But Alfred, determined to bring the project to a
A Personal Reminiscence timely conclusion, managed to book a flight to Newark later in
the day to deliver the advance copy to Judith McCartin (now
Judith Scheide) at the airport before immediately returning to
Rochester on the next flight. Here is an excerpt from the letter
he wrote to Bill a few days later:
before fleeing the Nazi regime in the late 1930s and emigrating
to America with his mother, Edith Weiss Mann (1888-1951).