Methods of Dewatering
Methods of Dewatering
Open sumps and ditches are economical, suitable for most soil and rock conditions, and effective for small depth lowering. However, they may lead to slope collapse and instability in the excavation base, especially in areas with steep slopes . Well point systems, on the other hand, offer rapid installation, filtered water with minimal particles, and reduced subsidence risk. However, they have a suction lift limit of about 6m and are unsuitable for large gravels, cobbles, or boulders .
Deep well drainage is costly but highly effective for deep water table lowering and in soils that become more pervious with depth or have artesian pressures. It requires heavy machinery and skilled labor for installation and management, which increases operational costs. However, it offers the advantage of reaching deeper levels than well points, making it a preferred choice for significant projects with budget flexibility .
Improper dewatering can cause slope instability, erosion, and even lead to local ecological disruptions due to changes in water tables. To mitigate these effects, techniques such as graded gravel filtration, proper suction lift management, and staged drainage systems are used. Additionally, it is essential to conduct thorough site assessments and plan the dewatering process meticulously to minimize ecological and geotechnical impacts .
Deep well systems lower water tables effectively and can be combined with well point systems, providing targeted water removal to prevent quick conditions where soil suddenly becomes fluid. Multistage systems ensure consistent lowering of hydrostatic pressure, which minimizes risk to braced excavations and structural integrity by preventing shifts that could lead to unstable foundations .
The presence of boulders and large gravels complicates the installation of well point systems due to the difficulty of jetting them into such soils. Consequently, this condition can hinder the establishment of effective suction pathways, reducing the system's water removal efficiency and overall effectiveness .
Soil permeability directly influences the spacing of well point systems. Highly permeable soils allow closer spacing (such as 0.3m for coarse gravels) to efficiently manage water flow. Conversely, less permeable soils, like silty sands, require wider spacing (1.5m) to prevent excessive surface flooding and maintain suction efficiency. This tailored spacing is crucial to optimizing the effectiveness of dewatering in varying soil conditions .
Dewatering is essential in civil engineering to provide dry working areas, stabilize slopes, reduce lateral pressures on foundations, increase foundation bearing capacity, prevent liquefaction, surface erosion, and frost heave damage. By lowering the water table or redirecting seepage, these processes enhance the safety and efficiency of construction projects such as building foundations, dams, and tunnels .
Electro osmosis involves applying an electromotive force that moves water molecules from the anode to the cathode in fine-grained soils, effectively pumping out water. It leverages electro osmotic flow, which is highly effective in clayey and silty soils where other methods fail. Compared to mechanical methods, it can be more precise and less disruptive, but it requires specific conditions and setup .
The multistage well point system allows for deeper drawdowns without the depth limitations faced by single-stage systems. By installing wells in two or more stages, it avoids issues with suction lift and air intake that limit a single well point to about 6m drawdown. However, this requires more extensive ground-level excavation to accommodate equipment and ensures better management of hydrostatic pressures and subsides .
Vacuum dewatering is most effective in fine-grained soils with permeability between 0.1 to 10x10-6 m/s. It utilizes well or well-point screens in conjunction with vacuum pumps to create hydraulic gradients that enhance water extraction from the soil. This suitability makes it ideal for fine soils where traditional gravity-based methods may be inefficient .