0% found this document useful (0 votes)
798 views11 pages

Methods of Dewatering

1) Dewatering involves lowering the water table or reducing water content in soil to provide a dry working area for construction projects. 2) Common dewatering methods include open sumps and ditches, well point systems, deep well drainage, vacuum dewatering systems, and electro-osmosis. 3) Well point systems use small screened wells that are jetted into the ground to draw water out, allowing water tables to be lowered up to 6 meters below the pump level. Deep well drainage involves installing deep wells outside the excavation zone to lower water tables over a large area.

Uploaded by

jinkumalakar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
798 views11 pages

Methods of Dewatering

1) Dewatering involves lowering the water table or reducing water content in soil to provide a dry working area for construction projects. 2) Common dewatering methods include open sumps and ditches, well point systems, deep well drainage, vacuum dewatering systems, and electro-osmosis. 3) Well point systems use small screened wells that are jetted into the ground to draw water out, allowing water tables to be lowered up to 6 meters below the pump level. Deep well drainage involves installing deep wells outside the excavation zone to lower water tables over a large area.

Uploaded by

jinkumalakar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

DEWATERING: Dewatering means modifying the ground by lowering the water table, redirecting seepage or

simply reducing the water content of the ground. Civil eng works such as in the stability of natural slopes and cuts,
dams and levees, excavation for structures, pavements etc. require extensive use of dewatering.

PURPOSES OF DEWATERING

To provide dry working area such as in excavation for building foundations, dams, tunnels etc.
To stabilize constructed or natural slopes
To reduce lateral pressures on foundations or retaining structures
To increase the bearing capacity of foundation
To prevent liquefaction
To prevent surface erosion
To prevent or reduce damage due to frost heave

METHODS OF DEWATERING SYSTEMS

Open sumps and ditches


Well point system
Deep well drainage
Vacuum dewatering systems
Dewatering by electro- osmosis
1) OPEN SUMPS AND DITCHES:

This method is suitable for Shallow excavation in well-graded soil or rock and for permeable soils resting on
impermeable strata. In this method, water is collected in sumps or ditches and then removed by pumping. Sump is
made below the ground level of excavation at one or more corners or sides. To prevent standing water on the floor of
excavation, a ditch is cut around excavation, falling towards the sump. Water from slopes falls into sump by gravity
and then it is pumped out from the sump.
Advantages

It is the most economical method for installation and maintenance


It can be applied to most soil and rock conditions
This method can also be used in situations where boulders and other obstructions are met within the ground.
Appropriate for small depth lowering.
The greatest depth to which water table can be lowered by this method is 8m below the pump level

Disadvantages

In areas with steep slopes, this method is not demanded.


This method will bring collapse of slopes and causes dangerous problems.
Use of sumps and ditches in open excavation will bring risk in stability of the base.
WELL POINT SYSTEMS: In this method, small well screens of sizes 50 to 80 mm in diameter and 0.3 to 1m length,
made out of brass or stainless steel with closed ends or self jetting types are used. Well points are required to maintain
for long period of working. Water drawn through the screens enters the space between the gauze and outside of the
riser pipe, and then from riser pipe to holes drilled in the bottom of this pipe and then reaches the surface. Well points
are installed by jetting them into the ground. Capacity of single well point with 50 mm riser is 10 l/m with the spacing
depending on permeability and availability of time to affect the drawdown. In fine to coarse sands, 0.75 to 1 m spacing,
in silty sands with low permeability, 1.5 m spacing and in highly permeable coarse gravels, 0.3 m spacing is normally
recommended.
2)
ADVANTAGES
Installation is very rapid.
Simple and cheap equipments.
Water is filtered and carries little or no particle.
Lesser danger of subsidence of the surrounding ground than open sump.

DISADVANTAGE
Serious limitation is suction lift
A lowering of about 6m below the pump level is possible beyond which excessive air shall be drawn into the system
through the joint in pipes, valves, etc. resulting in loss of pumping efficiency
If the ground consists of mainly large gravels cobbles or boulder, then it is not possible to install well points.

MULTISTAGE WELL POINT SYSTEM

Such wells are installed two or more stages. No limit to depth of drawdown in this way, but the width of excavation at
ground level becomes very large. Such well points are placed along with braced excavation, close to toes of the sheet
piles in order to ensure the lowering the water level between the sheet pile rows. It also helps to prevent probability of
development of quick condition of the bottom layers. They also help in eliminating hydrostatic pressure on the sheet
piles.
DEEPWELL DRAINAGE

These systems consist of deep wells and pumps installed outside the zone of construction with the purpose of lowering
the water table at the construction site to the desired level. Spacing should preferably between 0.8 to 8m depending on
the level of water table to be lowered, permeability of the strata etc. Such systems are suitable where the soil formation
becomes more and more pervious with depth. Also when a great depth of lowering of W.T. is required or where head
due to artesian pressure has to be lowered, such systems become more efficient. Deep wells may be combined with the
well point system on certain field condition for lowering the ground water table. Installation is done by sinking a cased
borehole having diameter 200 to 300 mm larger than well casing depending on size of pump. The inner well casing is
inserted after the completion of boring. A perforated screen is installed over the depth of soil which required
dewatering and is terminated with a 3 to 5 m long un-perforated pipe at the bottom to act as a sump for collecting any
fine material which might be drawn through filter mesh. Graded filter material is placed between the well casing and
the outer bore hole casing over the depth to be dewatered. The outer casing is then withdrawn in stages as the filter
material is placed. The space above the screen is backfilled with any available material. The water in well is then
surged by a boring tool to promote flow back and forth through the filter. At the same time any unwanted fines which
fall into the sump are cleared out by bailer before submersible pump is installed. Heavy boring plant is required in this
case to sink the well in very adverse formations like boulders rocks or under other difficult environment. Also, the cost
is relatively high.
VACCUM DEWATERING SYSTEM

Suitable for fine grained soils with permeability in the range of 0.1 to 10x10 -6 m/s. Such dewatering system requires
well or well point screens, riser pipe surrounded with filter sands. The top few portion of the hole is sealed or capped
with an impervious soil or other suitable material. By using the vacuum pressure created in the pumping main,
hydraulic gradient for flow to the well points is increased. Practical maximum height of lift for such system is about 3
to 6 m.
ELECTRO OSMOSIS

When an external electromotive force is applied across a solid liquid interface the movable diffuse double layer is
displaced tangentially with respect to the fixed layer. As the surface of fine grained soil particles causes negative
charge, the positive ions in solution are attracted towards the soil particles and concentrate near the surfaces. Upon
application of the electro motive force between two electrodes in a soil medium, these positive ions adjacent to the soil
particles and the water molecules attached to the ions are attracted to the cathode and are repelled by the anode. The
free water in the interior of the void spaces is carried along to the cathode. Thus, by making the cathode a well, water
can be collected in the well and then pumped out. The electro osmotic flow discharge (Qe) produced by an applied
electric field is given by:
Qe=keieA

Where, ke= Elecrtro osmotic permeability in cm/sec


ie = Electro osmosis hydraulic gradient.
A = C/S area of flow.

The simplest type of anode for normal applications are old pipes of 25 mm or 50 mm diameter which can easily driven
into the soil and can be placed either singly or in groups of two or three. Since the anode corrode considerably in the
course of few weeks of electro osmotic treatment, hence they should be replaced as soon as the current drops to less
than 30% of the consumption.
Two basic arrangements of cathode wells are either they are well arranged separately but in close proximity to the
cathode or the cathode and the well combined as one body.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Open sumps and ditches are economical, suitable for most soil and rock conditions, and effective for small depth lowering. However, they may lead to slope collapse and instability in the excavation base, especially in areas with steep slopes . Well point systems, on the other hand, offer rapid installation, filtered water with minimal particles, and reduced subsidence risk. However, they have a suction lift limit of about 6m and are unsuitable for large gravels, cobbles, or boulders .

Deep well drainage is costly but highly effective for deep water table lowering and in soils that become more pervious with depth or have artesian pressures. It requires heavy machinery and skilled labor for installation and management, which increases operational costs. However, it offers the advantage of reaching deeper levels than well points, making it a preferred choice for significant projects with budget flexibility .

Improper dewatering can cause slope instability, erosion, and even lead to local ecological disruptions due to changes in water tables. To mitigate these effects, techniques such as graded gravel filtration, proper suction lift management, and staged drainage systems are used. Additionally, it is essential to conduct thorough site assessments and plan the dewatering process meticulously to minimize ecological and geotechnical impacts .

Deep well systems lower water tables effectively and can be combined with well point systems, providing targeted water removal to prevent quick conditions where soil suddenly becomes fluid. Multistage systems ensure consistent lowering of hydrostatic pressure, which minimizes risk to braced excavations and structural integrity by preventing shifts that could lead to unstable foundations .

The presence of boulders and large gravels complicates the installation of well point systems due to the difficulty of jetting them into such soils. Consequently, this condition can hinder the establishment of effective suction pathways, reducing the system's water removal efficiency and overall effectiveness .

Soil permeability directly influences the spacing of well point systems. Highly permeable soils allow closer spacing (such as 0.3m for coarse gravels) to efficiently manage water flow. Conversely, less permeable soils, like silty sands, require wider spacing (1.5m) to prevent excessive surface flooding and maintain suction efficiency. This tailored spacing is crucial to optimizing the effectiveness of dewatering in varying soil conditions .

Dewatering is essential in civil engineering to provide dry working areas, stabilize slopes, reduce lateral pressures on foundations, increase foundation bearing capacity, prevent liquefaction, surface erosion, and frost heave damage. By lowering the water table or redirecting seepage, these processes enhance the safety and efficiency of construction projects such as building foundations, dams, and tunnels .

Electro osmosis involves applying an electromotive force that moves water molecules from the anode to the cathode in fine-grained soils, effectively pumping out water. It leverages electro osmotic flow, which is highly effective in clayey and silty soils where other methods fail. Compared to mechanical methods, it can be more precise and less disruptive, but it requires specific conditions and setup .

The multistage well point system allows for deeper drawdowns without the depth limitations faced by single-stage systems. By installing wells in two or more stages, it avoids issues with suction lift and air intake that limit a single well point to about 6m drawdown. However, this requires more extensive ground-level excavation to accommodate equipment and ensures better management of hydrostatic pressures and subsides .

Vacuum dewatering is most effective in fine-grained soils with permeability between 0.1 to 10x10-6 m/s. It utilizes well or well-point screens in conjunction with vacuum pumps to create hydraulic gradients that enhance water extraction from the soil. This suitability makes it ideal for fine soils where traditional gravity-based methods may be inefficient .

You might also like