Black Flag Sydney Sex Work Sexism and Unionism

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Sex Work, Sexism and Unionism

Black Flag Sydney

8th June 2021

This article discusses sexual violence.


As news emerged in April that Nationals MP Michael Johnson had raped a sex worker, the
Liberals and Nationals didn’t flinch in moralising over the employment of a sex worker to distract
from the crisis of sexism pervasive in their parties, and in the ruling class as a whole. But why
could the government so readily scapegoat sex work to distract from sexism? And what role does
sex work play in Australian society?
We can find the answers by looking at why the ruling class uses its cultural and material power
to reinforce gender roles in the nuclear family. Sex work is best understood as a form of “social
reproduction”, a type of work whose product is the reproduction of workers and their capacity
to labour. This type of labour is as diverse as housework, to childhood education, to sex and the
raising of children, to the cultural reproduction of the nuclear family. Like other forms of work,
sex work has existed for centuries alongside class societies, but has changed substantially under
the the nuclear family arrangement, which was a necessary part of the growth of capitalism.
Oppressive gender difference in social roles exists in class societies as a method of reinforcing
the class system. These diverse forms of gender differences were kneaded and exacerbated by in
the transition between feudalism to capitalism including in methods of capitalist expansion like
colonialism and imperialism, dividing the feudal peasant or colonised subject into the male wage
worker, and the female ‘housewife’ who tended to his needs. This division of work continues to
this day, as working women still fulfil the majority of social reproductive tasks across capitalist
societies, regardless of their individual employment status.
With this analysis in mind we can understand what unites sex work as such a diverse industry,
which includes camming, OnlyFans subscriptions, stripping, full in-person service. In general we
can theorise all these activities as an intensive form of feminised service-driven entertainment:
it’s not only about satisfying a direct sexual desire, but it’s about providing a sense of intimacy
and human interaction that is alienated under the social stranglehold of capitalist life. In this
sense sex work is ‘social reproduction’ work as its an industry predicated around alleviating
social alienation, thereby alleviating the negative effects of unmanaged social alienation on the
labour force.
Whilst sex workers perform a social reproductive function the industry subverts the very
nuclear family that capitalism built to make women bear the cost of social reproductive labour
without payment. This gives it a contradictory position as a form of labour: as fulfilling a ‘re-
productive’ need, whilst being criminalised and suppressed in the name of ‘family values’. This
explains both why sex work has continued to persist despite the oppression by state criminalisa-
tion and workplace violence. It also helps explain the existance of gay sex workers, male stripping
and sex work by non-women, as sex work as work is about alienation; the terms of that alien-
ation and the conditions of work are determined by sexism. So called radical feminism poses
the argument that sex work is an inhetently oppressive act as it involves ‘selling the body’ of a
women to a man. This ignores that under our current system, all labour requires ‘selling your
body’ for a wage, and that there is nothing more inherently oppressive about the nature of sex
work than there is about domestic labour, nursing, or teaching. Given sex in abstract isn’t op-
pressive, then the commodification of sex cannot be oppressive beyond what labour and social
conditions are placed on that commodification. Therefore the real oppression within sex work
lies in the conditions of work that are imposed on these feminised industries, which has often
meant wage gaps between feminised and non-feminised industry, but in the case of sex work has
meant an increase of legal controls over the work, rather than anything inherent to the activity.
The criminalisation of sex work, proposed as a solution to ‘liberate’ women from the industry,
instead makes cops the bosses of sex workers and leads to further exploitation by the state and
sex workers more vulnerable to violence in general.
However it’s not enough to declare that sex work is work, our task is to develop a strategy to
give sex workers power over their own industry and lives. The approach of the radical feminists
- to try to eliminate sex work via the legal and police system - has not only failed but is inherely
flawed, precisely because sex work will continue to have a purpose under capitalism, and also
as its premise rests on the false assumption that sex work is inherently more exploitative than
other wage relationships. Instead, our strategy should not be to abolish, but transform sex work.
We do this by winning reforms that decrease the power of the ruling class to oppress workers: by
fully decriminalising the industry and ending police control over sex workers, and to organise
industrially with workers to support and protect themselves. Looking to our immediate future,
we have to fight with sex worker calls for changes to the Anti-Discrimination Act, to make it
illegal for sex workers to be discriminated for their profession, and to oppose the threats posed
on self worker autonomy and safety by the Online Safety Bill, which could permit suppression
and margionalisation of sex worker voices and work. Beyond that, we should be looking to build
industrial unionism for sex workers - to topple the state oppression, fight against exploitative
bosses, and unite with other works to smash the entire system.

2
The Anarchist Library
Anti-Copyright

Black Flag Sydney


Sex Work, Sexism and Unionism
8th June 2021

Retrieved on 13th April 2022 from https://blackflagsydney.com/article/18

theanarchistlibrary.org

You might also like