Unit 4 - Ethical Consideration in Leadership and

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

UNIT 4 - ETHICAL

CONSIDERATION IN
LEADERSHIP AND
MANAGEMENT
Maria Luisa T. Uayan, DHSc, MSN,RN
Professor - Bioethics
MORAL DECISION MAKING
• Moral Discernment
• Olson (2002) refers to the ability to discern what is morally right from
morally wrong that requires moral reflectiveness on the meaning of good
and bad. It refers to ability to draw conclusions from the discernment to
develop convictions.

• Four Principles of Moral Discernment/Judgment


• Principle of formal cooperation
• Principle of Material cooperation
• Principle of lessser evil
• Principle of double effect
• Principle of Well-Informed Conscience –

• Informed consent to medical treatment is fundamental in


both ethics and law.

• Patients have the right to receive information and ask


questions about recommended treatments so that they
can make well-considered decisions about care.

• Successful communication in the patient-physician


relationship fosters trust and supports shared decision
making.
Ethical Dilemma
• is a problem in the decision-making process between two
possible options, neither of which is absolutely acceptable
from an ethical perspective;

• Approaches to solve an ethical dilemma were deduced:


• Refute the paradox (dilemma): The situation must be carefully
analyzed. In some cases, the existence of the dilemma can be
logically refuted.

• Value theory approach: Choose the alternative that offers the


greater good or the lesser evil.

• Find alternative solutions: In some cases, the problem can be


reconsidered, and new alternative solutions may arise.
PROCESS OF ETHICAL DECISION MAKING

• Gather data and identify conflicting moral claims

• Identify key participants

• Determine moral perspective and phase of moral


development of key participants

• Determine desired outcomes

• Identify options

• Act on the choice

• Evaluate outcomes of actions


Gather data and identify conflicting
moral claims
• What makes this situation an ethical problem? Are there
conflicting obligations, duties, principles, rights, loyalties,
values or beliefs?

• What are the issues?

• What facts seem most important?

• What emotions have an impact?

• What are the gaps in information at this time?


Identify key participants
• Who is legitimately empowered to make this decision?

• Who is affected and how?

• What is the level of competence of the person most


affected in relation to the decision to be made?

• What are the rights, duties, authority, context, and


capabilities of participants?
Determine moral perspective and phase
of moral development of key participants
• Do participants think in terms of duties and rights?

• Do the parties involved exhibit similar or different moral


perspectives?

• Where is the common ground? The difference?

• What principles are important to each person involved?

• What emotions are evident within the interaction and with


each person involved?

• What is the level of moral development of the participants?


Determine desired outcomes
• How does each party describe the
circumstances of the outcome?

• What are the consequences of the desired


outcomes?

• What outcomes are unacceptable to one or all


involved?
Identify options
• What options emerge through the assessment process?

• How do the alternatives fit the lifestyle and values of the


person(s) affected?

• What are legal considerations of the various options?

• What alternatives are unacceptable to one or all


involved?

• How are alternatives weighted, ranked, and prioritized?


Act on the choice
• Be empowered to make a difficult
decision

• Give yourself permission to set aside


less acceptable alternatives

• Be attentive to the emotions involved


in this process.
Evaluate outcomes of action
• Has the ethical dilemma been resolved?

• Have other dilemmas emerged related to


the action?

• How was the process affected those


involved?

• Are further actions required?

You might also like