Naduvinamani 2001
Naduvinamani 2001
Naduvinamani 2001
Abstract: In this paper an attempt has been made to study the rheological effects of coupled stress fluids
on the static and dynamic behaviour of squeeze-film lubrication in porous journal bearings. A generalized
modified form of the Reynolds equation is derived for the squeeze-film lubrication of porous journal
bearings with a coupled stress fluid as the lubricant. The analysis takes into account the velocity slip at the
surface of the porous medium by using the Beavers– Joseph criterion. A closed-form expression for the
squeeze-film pressure is obtained for the narrow porous journal bearing. The cases of a constant applied
load and an alternating applied load are analysed. It is observed that the effect of coupled stress is to
increase significantly the squeeze-film pressure and the load-carrying capacity compared with the
Newtonian case. Under cyclic loading, the coupled stresses developed in the fluid cause a reduction in the
velocity of the journal centre and an increase in the minimum permissible squeeze-film thickness.
A schematic diagram of the problem under study is purely viscous. This assumption is made to model the flow
shown in Fig. 1. The non-porous journal of radius R is situation in which the polymer additives present in
approaching the homogeneous and isotropic porous bearing lubricant do not percolate into the porous matrix, i.e. it is
surface with a given velocity dh=dt at any circumferential assumed that the pore size of the porous bearing is less than
section õ. The lubricant between the journal and porous the size of polar additives present in the lubricant.
bearing is a Stokes coupled stress fluid and the body forces Under the usual assumptions of hydrodynamic lubrica-
and body couples are assumed to be absent. However, the tion applicable to a thin film [15], the equations of motion
fluid in the porous matrix of the bearing is assumed to be (4) and (5) take the form
J03400 # IMechE 2001 Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J
48 N B NADUVINAMANI, P S HIREMATH AND G GURUBASAVARAJ
@u @v @w L L
‡ ‡ ˆ0 (6) v ˆ ¡v1 , 0 < x < 2ð R, ¡ <z<
@x @ y @z 2 2
(15b)
@2 u @4 u @ p
í ¡è 4 ˆ (7) á
@y 2 @y @x @w
p (w ¡ w1 ) ˆ , 0 < x < 2ð R,
k @y
@2 w @4 w @ p
í ¡è 4 ˆ (8)
@y 2 @y @z L L
¡ <z< (15c)
2 2
@p
0ˆ (9)
@y @2 u @2 w
ˆ ˆ 0, 0 < x < 2ð R,
@ y 2 @ y2
The flow of a viscous fluid in a porous matrix is governed
by Darcy’s law
L L
k @ p1 ¡ <z< (15d)
u1 ˆ ¡ (10) 2 2
í @x
In equations (14) and (15), L is the bearing length and á is
k @ p1 the slip coefficient; equations (14d) and (15d) indicate the
v1 ˆ ¡ (11)
í @y vanishing of coupled stresses on the boundaries at y ˆ h
and y ˆ 0 respectively.
k @ p1 The solution of equations (7) and (8) subjected to the
w1 ˆ ¡ (12)
í @z boundary conditions (equation 14a), (14c), (15a), (15c) and
(15d) is obtained as
where k is the permeability and p1 is the pressure in the μ ¶
porous region which, due to continuity, satisfies the 1 @p h tanh(lh=2)
uˆ ê
( y ¡ h) y ‡ 1 ¡ 2
Laplace equation 2í @ x 3 l(hs ‡ 1)
μ ¶¼
@ 2 p1 @ 2 p1 @ 2 p1 2 cosh(ly ¡ lh=2)
‡ ‡ ˆ0 (13) ‡ 2 1¡ (16)
@x 2 @ y2 @z 2 l cosh(lh=2)
μ ¶
The relevant boundary conditions for velocity components 1 @p h tanh(lh=2)
wˆ ( y ¡ h) y ‡ ê1 ¡ 2
are as follows: 2í @ z 3 l(hs ‡ 1)
μ ¶¼
(a) At the journal surface y ˆ h, 2 cosh(ly ¡ lh=2)
‡ 2 1¡ (17)
l cosh(lh=2)
L L
u ˆ 0, 0 < x < 2ð R, ¡ <z< (14a)
2 2 where
dh L L ´1=2
vˆ , 0 < x < 2ð R, ¡ <z< (14b) 3(2á2 ‡ hs) í
dt 2 2 ê1 ˆ , lˆ , x ˆ Rõ
hs(hs ‡ 1) è
L L
w ˆ 0, 0 < x < 2ð R, ¡ <z< (14c) á
2 2 h ˆ c(1 ‡ å cos õ), s ˆ p
k
@ 2 u @2 w
ˆ ˆ 0, 0 < x < 2ð R,
@ y 2 @ y2 and å ˆ e=c is the eccentricity ratio, c being the radial
clearance.
L L Substituting equations (16) and (17) into equation (6)
¡ <z< (14d)
2 2 and integrating over the film thickness and also using the
boundary conditions (14b) and (15b) give the modified
(b) At the bearing surface y ˆ 0, Reynolds equation as
μ ¶ μ ¶
@ @p @ @p
á @u f (h, s, l ) ‡ f (h, s, l )
p (u ¡ u1 ) ˆ , 0 < x < 2ð R, @x @x @z @z
k @y
μ ¶
dh @ p1
L L ˆ 12 í ¡ 12k (18)
¡ <z< (15a) dt @ y yˆ0
2 2
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 J03400 # IMechE 2001
STATIC AND DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF SQUEEZE-FILM LUBRICATION 49
Fig. 2 Non-dimensional film pressure p versus õ for different values of the coupled stress parameter l with
¾ ˆ 0.01 and s ˆ 5.0 for å ˆ 0.4 and 0.6
Fig. 3 Non-dimensional film pressure p versus õ for different values of ¾ with l ˆ 2.0 and s ˆ 5.0 for å ˆ 0.4
and 0.6
J03400 # IMechE 2001 Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J
50 N B NADUVINAMANI, P S HIREMATH AND G GURUBASAVARAJ
where L
p ˆ 0, 0 < õ < 2ð, at z ˆ § (21)
2
h2 tanh(lh=2)
f (h, s, l ) ˆh3 (1 ‡ ê1 ) ¡ 6 (b) For the porous region,
hs ‡ 1 l
μ ¶
12 tanh(lh=2) p1 ˆ 0, 0 < õ < 2ð, ¡ H < y < 0,
¡ 2 h¡2
l l
L
dh då at z ˆ § (22)
ˆ c cos õ 2
dt dt
@ p1 L L
For k ! 0, equation (18) reduces to the non-porous case ˆ 0, 0 < õ < 2ð, ¡ <z< ,
@y 2 2
[12].
Using the short bearing approximation, the circumferen- at y ˆ ¡H (23)
tial pressure variation can be neglected in comparison with
the axial pressure variations. Then equations (13) and (18)
(c) At the interface,
become
L L
@ 2 p1 @ 2 p1 p1 ˆ p, 0 < õ < 2ð, ¡ <z< ,
‡ ˆ0 (19) 2 2
@ y2 @z 2
μ ¶ at y ˆ 0 (24)
@2 p dh @ p1
f (h, s, l ) 2 ˆ 12 í ‡ 12k (20)
@z dt @ y yˆ0 In equations (22) and (23), H is the porous layer thickness.
The solution of equation (19) satisfying the boundary
The relevant boundary conditions for the pressure are as conditions (22) and (23) is
follows: X
1
p1 (õ, y, z) ˆ C n cos(ìn z) cosh[ì n ( y ‡ H)] (25)
(a) For the film region, nˆ1
Fig. 4 Non-dimensional film pressure p versus õ for different values of s with ¾ ˆ 0.01 and l ˆ 2.0 for å ˆ 0.4
and 0.6
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 J03400 # IMechE 2001
STATIC AND DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF SQUEEZE-FILM LUBRICATION 51
where ìn ˆ (2n ¡ 1)ð/L and C n are the Fourier coefficients Introducing the non-dimensional transformations
to be determined by using the orthogonality of cosine
functions. x z
Equations (25) and (20) yield õˆ , zˆ , l ˆ lc
R L
X
1
¡48 í L2 (¡1) n¡1 (dh=dt) cos(ìn z)
p(õ, z) ˆ
2 ì3 ì ì
nˆ1 c n [ f (h, s, l) ‡ 12(k= n )tanh( n H )] k H h
kˆ , Hˆ , hˆ
(26) c2 L c
Fig. 5 Non-dimensional maximum film pressure pmax versus ¾ for different values of the coupled stress
parameter l with å ˆ 0.4 and s ˆ 5.0
J03400 # IMechE 2001 Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J
52 N B NADUVINAMANI, P S HIREMATH AND G GURUBASAVARAJ
pc2 ác
pˆ , s ˆ p
í R2 (då=dt) k
into equation (26) gives the non-dimensional squeeze-film pressure (after suppressing the bars) in the form
X
1
(¡1) n cos õ cos[(2n ¡ 1)ð z]
p(õ, z) ˆ 192â2 (27)
nˆ1
(2n ¡ 1)3 ð3 f f (õ, s, l) ‡ [12¾ =[(2 n ¡ 1)ð H ] tanh[2n ¡ 1)ð H ]g
Fig. 6 Non-dimensional load-carrying capacity W versus å for different values of the coupled stress parameter l
with s ˆ 5.0 and s ˆ 1
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 J03400 # IMechE 2001
STATIC AND DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF SQUEEZE-FILM LUBRICATION 53
Fig. 7 Non-dimensional load-carrying capacity W verus å for different values of s with l ˆ 5.0, ¾ ˆ 0.001 and
á ˆ 0.1
J03400 # IMechE 2001 Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J
54 N B NADUVINAMANI, P S HIREMATH AND G GURUBASAVARAJ
Substituting equation (27) into equation (28) gives the non- g n (õ, s, l )
dimensional load-carrying capacity in W in the form
¼¡1
12¾
Ws c2 ˆ f (õ, s, l ) ‡ ð
tanh[(2n ¡ 1) H ]
W ˆ (2n ¡ 1)ð H
í LR3 (då=dt)
… 3ð=2
384â2 X
1 In many applications the pure squeeze-film bearing will
1
ˆ cos2 õ g n (õ, s, l ) dõ operate under dynamic conditions. In these cases, the path
ð4 nˆ1 (2n ¡ 1)4 õˆð=2
of the rotor centre will fluctuate in a manner compatible
(30) with the variations of the applied load. Hence, a bearing
Fig. 8 Non-dimensional load-carrying capacity W versus ¾ for different values of coupled stress parameter l with
s ˆ 5.0
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 J03400 # IMechE 2001
STATIC AND DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF SQUEEZE-FILM LUBRICATION 55
Fig. 9 Velocity of the journal centre, då=dô, versus ô for various values of the coupled stress parameter l with
s ˆ 5.0, S¤ ˆ 0.8, ¾ ˆ 0.01 and å ˆ 0.4 under a sinusoidal load
J03400 # IMechE 2001 Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J
56 N B NADUVINAMANI, P S HIREMATH AND G GURUBASAVARAJ
length of the polar additives in a lubricant. Therefore, the s, defined by s ˆ á c= k, give the effects of permeability
dimensionless parameter l provides the relevant mechanism and velocity slip respectively.
for the interaction of the fluid with the bearing geometry. For the graphical representation of results, the pressure
The polar effects will be prominent when either the p, the load-carrying capacity W and the velocity of the
molecular size of the polar additives is large or the radial journal centre, då=dt, are computed by summing the
Fig. 10 Velocity of the journal centre, då=dô, versus ô for different values of s with l ˆ 5.0, S¤ ˆ 0.8, ¾ ˆ 0.01
and å ˆ 0.4 under a sinusoidal load
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 J03400 # IMechE 2001
STATIC AND DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF SQUEEZE-FILM LUBRICATION 57
infinite series in equations (27), (30) and (32) respectively, parameter ¾ and for different values of the slip parameter s
up to the first 100 terms, which yields sufficient accuracy respectively. In Fig. 2, the effect of coupled stresses is to
in the computed values. The integrals in equations (30) and increase the fluid-film pressure compared with the New-
(32) are computed numerically. tonian case (l ! 1). The increase in the pressure is more
The non-dimensional pressure p is a function of the pronounced for the larger value of the eccentricity ratio å.
circumferential coordinate õ. Figures 2, 3 and 4 depict the In Fig. 3, it is observed that the effect of the permeability
õ dependence of p for different values of the coupled stress parameter ¾ is to decrease the fluid-film pressure com-
parameter l, for different values of the permeability pared with the solid bearing [12]. In Fig. 4, the effect of
Fig. 11 Velocity of the journal centre, då/dô, versus ô for various values of ¾ with s ˆ 5.0, l ˆ 5.0, S¤ ˆ 0.8 and
å ˆ 0.4
J03400 # IMechE 2001 Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J
58 N B NADUVINAMANI, P S HIREMATH AND G GURUBASAVARAJ
slip is to reduce the squeeze-film pressure. Further, the The dimensionless load-carrying capacity W is a func-
maximum squeeze-film pressure pmax is attained at tion of the eccentricity ratio å. In Figs 6 and 7, the å
õ ˆ 1808. Figure 5 indicates the variation in pmax with the dependence of W for different values of l and s respectively
permeability parameter ¾ for different values of l. It is are shown. It is observed that the load-carrying capacity is
found that pmax is insensitive to variations in ¾ up to higher for coupled stress fluids than for the Newtonian
¾ ˆ 0.0001 and, for ¾ . 0.0001, pmax reduces rapidly for case. This result is expected in view of the fact that coupled
increasing values of ¾. This result is expected since larger stress accounts for the higher squeeze-film pressure as
values of ¾ represent a more sparsely packed porous layer. noted in the foregoing discussions. Further, the effect of
Interestingly, this result also provides a design criterion that slip is to reduce the load-carrying capacity, since the slip
enables the lubrication engineer to choose the bearing accounts for the reduction in the squeeze-film pressure.
parameters k, H and c so as to restrict ¾ values to less than Figure 8 indicates the variation in W with ¾ for different
0.0001 in order to obtain maximum pressure build-up in values of l and å. The graphs of W versus ¾ indicate the
the squeeze film. existence of a critical value ¾critical of ¾, such that W is
Fig. 12 Locus of the journal centre for different values of the coupled stress parameter l with s ˆ 5.0, S¤ ˆ 10.0
and ¾ ˆ 0.001
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 J03400 # IMechE 2001
STATIC AND DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF SQUEEZE-FILM LUBRICATION 59
insensitive to variations in ¾ for ¾ , ¾critical and reduces time variable ô, for various values of l with the Sommerfeld
rapidly for ¾ . ¾critical . Further, it is observed that ¾critical number S¤ ˆ 0.8, s ˆ 5.0, ¾ ˆ 0.01 and å(0) ˆ 0.4 under
decreases as å decreases. Thus, this result helps the design a sinusoidal load, which is exhibited in Fig. 9. The velocity
engineer to choose suitable values for the design para- of the journal centre is found to be reduced for coupled
meters in order to achieve the optimum bearing perform- stress fluids compared with the Newtonian case. This is
ance. because the coupled stresses result in an increase in the
The bearing performance under dynamic loading is load-carrying capacity and, hence, cause more resistance to
examined by considering the variation in the velocity of the the journal motion. Figure 10 exhibits the effects of slip on
journal centre, då=dô, as a function of the dimensionless the journal motion. The journal centre velocity is found to
Fig. 13 Minimum possible height hmin versus 1=l for different values of S¤ with s ˆ 10.0 and ¾ ˆ 0.001 under a
sinusoidal load
J03400 # IMechE 2001 Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J
60 N B NADUVINAMANI, P S HIREMATH AND G GURUBASAVARAJ
be increased as s decreases in comparison with the no-slip with microstructure additives is smaller than for Newtonian
case (s ! 1). Further, Fig. 11 shows the effect of the lubricants. Thus the coupled stresses developed in the fluid
permeability parameter on the journal motion. It is ob- film cause a reduction in the journal centre velocity by
served that the journal velocity decreases as ¾ decreases. offering higher resistance to the journal motion and also
Figure 12 depicts the locus of the journal centre with the allow a smaller eccentricity ratio å. Consequently, the
Sommerfeld number S¤ ˆ 10, the permeability parameter porous squeeze-film bearing lubricated with the coupled
¾ ˆ 0.001 and the slip parameter s ˆ 5.0, for different stress fluid can sustain the same load for a longer period of
values of the coupled stress parameter l under a sinusoidal time than in the corresponding Newtonian case.
load. It is observed that the eccentricity ratio å for fluids The dimensionless minimum permissible height hmin
Fig. 14 Minimum possible height hmin versus 1=l for different values of ¾ with S¤ ˆ 10.0 and s ˆ 10.0 under a
sinusoidal load
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 J03400 # IMechE 2001
STATIC AND DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF SQUEEZE-FILM LUBRICATION 61
Fig. 15 Minimum possible height hmin versus S¤ for different values of the coupled stress parameter l with s ˆ 10.0
and ¾ ˆ 0.001 under a sinusoidal load
J03400 # IMechE 2001 Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J
62 N B NADUVINAMANI, P S HIREMATH AND G GURUBASAVARAJ
enhancements are due to polymer thickening in short bearing using Beaver–Joseph criterion of velocity slip. Trans.
journal bearings [5]. Further, the velocity of the journal ASME, J. Appl. Mechanics, 1974, 41, 348–354.
centre is found to be reduced compared with the New- 4 Uma, S. The analysis of double layered porous slider bearing.
tonian case. Also, the minimum permissible height hmin is Wear, 1977, 42, 205–215.
larger for coupled stress fluids. Thus the bearing life is 5 Oliver, D. R. The load enhancement effects due to polymer
thickening in a short journal bearing. J. Non-Newtonian
improved due to the prevention of direct contact with the
Mechanics, 1988, 31, 185–196.
bearing journal for a longer duration. The analysis shows 6 Stokes, V. K. Couple stresses in fluids. Physics Fluids, 1966,
the existence of critical values of the permeability 9, 1709–1715.
parameter ¾ such that the load-carrying capacity is 7 Gowariker, V. R., Viswanathan, N. V. and Sreedhar, J.
independent of ¾ for ¾ , ¾critical and is found to Polymer Science, 1999 (New Age International Limited, New
decrease rapidly for ¾ . ¾critical . The value of ¾critical Delhi).
decreases as the eccentricity ratio å decreases. The effect 8 Bujurke, N. M., Bhavi, S. G. and Naduvinamani, N. B. The
of velocity slip at the porous interface is to reduce the effects of couple stresses in squeeze film poro-elastic bearings
load-carrying capacity and to increase the velocity of the with special reference to synovial joints. IMA J. Math. Appl.
journal centre. These results help design engineers to Medicine Biol., 1990, 7, 231–243.
choose the appropriate values for the design parameters in 9 Bujurke, N. M., Naduvinamani, N. B. and Jayaraman, G.
Theoretical modeling of poro-elastic slider bearings lubricated
order to achieve the optimum bearing performance.
by couple stress fluids with special reference to synovial
joints. Appl. Math. Modeling, 1991, 15, 319–324.
10 Bujurke, N. M. and Naduvinamani, N. B. On the perform-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ance of narrow porous journal bearing lubricated with couple
stress fluids. Acta Mechanica, 1991, 86, 179–191.
The authors thank the referees for their valuable comments 11 Gupta, R. S. and Sharma, L. G. Analysis of couple stress
on the earlier draft of the paper. This work is supported by lubricant in hydrostatic thrust bearing. Wear, 1988, 125,
the University Grants Commission, India [major research 257–270.
12 Lin, J. R. Static and dynamic behaviours of pure squeeze
project F.8-3/98(SR-1)].
films in couple stress fluids-lubricated short journal bearings.
Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part J, Journal of Engineering
Tribology, 1997, 211(J1), 29–36.
REFERENCES 13 Beavers, G. S. and Joseph, D. D. Boundary conditions of a
naturally permeable wall. J. Fluid Mechanics, 1967, 30,
1 Wu, H. A review of porous squeeze films. Wear, 1978, 47, 197–207.
371–385. 14 Taylor, R. I. The inclusion of lubricant shear thinning in the
2 Gupta, R. S. and Kapur, V. K. Centrifugal effects in short bearing approximation. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part J,
hydrostatic porous thrust bearing. J. Lubric. Technol., 1979, Journal of Engineering Tribology, 1999, 213(J1), 35–46.
101, 381–392. 15 Cameron, A. Basic Lubrication Theory, 1981 (John Wiley
3 Prakash, J. and Vij, S. K. Analysis of narrow porous journal Eastern, New Delhi).
Proc Instn Mech Engrs Vol 215 Part J Downloaded from pij.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on December 19, 2014 J03400 # IMechE 2001