Environment Protection Act 1986
Environment Protection Act 1986
Environment Protection Act 1986
The Environment (Protection) Act was enacted in the year 1986. It was enacted with the main objective to
provide the protection and improvement of environment and for matters connected therewith. The Act is one
of the most comprehensive legislations with a pretext to protection and improvement of the environment.
The Constitution of India also provides for the protection of the environment. Article 48A of the Constitution
specifies that the State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests
and wildlife of the country. Article 51 A further provides that every citizen shall protect the environment.
https://www.legalbites.in/environmental-protection-act1986/ 1/10
9/26/2020 Environment Protection Act,1986 (Overview)
It is now generally accepted that environment is threatened by a wide variety of human activities ranging
from the instinctive drive to reproduce its kind to the restless urge of improving the standards of living,
development of technological solutions to this end, the vast amount of waste, both natural and chemical, that
these advances produce.
Paradoxically, this urge to grow and develop, which was initially uncontrolled is now widely perceived
to be threatening as it results in the depletion of both living and non-living natural resources and life
support systems. The air, water, land, living creatures as well as the environment, in general, is
becoming polluted at an alarming rate that needs to be controlled and curbed as soon as possible.
The 1986 Act was enacted in this spirit.
From time to time various legislations have been enacted in India for this purpose. However, all legislations
prior to the 1986 Act have been specific relating to precise aspects of environmental pollution. However, the
1986 Act was general legislation enacted under Article 253 (Legislation for giving effect to international
agreements.
Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Chapter, Parliament has the power to make any
law for the whole or any part of the territory of India for implementing any treaty, agreement or convention
with any other country or countries or any decision made at any international conference, association or
other bodies) of the Constitution, pursuant to the international obligations of India.
India was a signatory to the Stockholm Conference of 1972 where the world community had resolved to
protect and enhance the environment.
The United Nations conference on the human environment, held in Stockholm in June 1972,
proclaimed that “Man is both creator and moulder of his environment, which gives him physical
sustenance and affords him the opportunity for intellectual, moral, social and spiritual growth.
https://www.legalbites.in/environmental-protection-act1986/ 2/10
9/26/2020 Environment Protection Act,1986 (Overview)
In the long and tortuous evolution of the human race on this planet, a stage has reached when
through the rapid acceleration of science and technology man has acquired the power to transform
his environment in countless ways and on an unprecedented scale. Both aspects of man’s
environment, the natural and man-made are essential to his well being and to the enjoyment of basic
human rights even the right to life itself”.
While several legislations such as The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974and The Air
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 were enacted after the Conference, the need for general
legislation had become increasingly evident. The EPA was enacted so as to overcome this deficiency.
Objectives
As mentioned earlier, the main objective of the Act was to provide the protection and improvement of
environment and for matters connected therewith. Other objectives of the implementation of the EPA are:
To implement the decisions made at the UN Conference on Human Environment held at Stockholm in June 1972.
To enact a general law on the areas of environmental protection which were left uncovered by existing laws. The
existing laws were more specific in nature and concentrated on a more specific type of pollution and specific categories
of hazardous substances rather than on general problems that chiefly caused major environmental hazards.
To co-ordinate activities of the various regulatory agencies under the existing laws
To provide for the creation of an authority or authorities for environmental protection
To provide deterrent punishment to those who endanger the human environment, safety and health
The Environment (Protection) Act is applicable to the whole of India including Jammu & Kashmir. It came into
force on November 19, 1986.
Definitions
Section 2 of the EPA deals with definitions. Some important definitions provided in the Section are:
Section 2 (a) “Environment” includes water, air, and land and the interrelationship that exists among and between
water, air and land and human beings, other living creatures, plants, micro-organism and property. This definition is not
exhaustive but an inclusive one.
Section 2 (b) “Environmental Pollutant” means any solid, liquid or gaseous substance present in such concentration
as may be, or tend to be injurious to environment.
Section 2 (c) “Environmental Pollution” means the presence in the environment of any environmental pollutant. This
implies an imbalance in the environment. The materials or substances when after mixing in air, water or land alters their
https://www.legalbites.in/environmental-protection-act1986/ 3/10
9/26/2020 Environment Protection Act,1986 (Overview)
properties in such manner, that the very use of all or any of the air-water and land by man and any other living organism
becomes lethal and dangerous for health.
Section 2 (e) “Hazardous Substance” means any substance or preparation which, by reasons of its chemical or
Physico-chemical properties or handling, is liable to cause harm to human beings, other living creatures, plants, micro-
organism, property or environment.
According to the provisions of the Act, the Central Government shall have the power to take all such
measures as it deems necessary or expedient for the purpose of protecting and improving the quality of the
environment and preventing controlling and abating environmental pollution.
Such measures may include measures with respect to all or any of the following matters, namely:
a. co-ordination of actions by the State Governments, officers and other authorities- (a) under
this Act, or the rules made thereunder, or (b) under any other law for the time being in force
which is relatable to the objects of this Act;
b. planning and execution of a nation-wide programme for the prevention, control and
abatement of environmental pollution;
c. laying down standards for the quality of the environment in its various aspects;
d. laying down standards for emission or discharge of environmental pollutants from various
sources whatsoever: Provided that different standards for emission or discharge may be laid
down under this clause from different sources having regard to the quality or composition of
the emission or discharge of environmental pollutants from such sources;
e. restriction of areas in which any industries, operations or processes or class of industries,
operations or processes shall not be carried out or shall be carried out subject to certain
safeguards;
f. laying down procedures and safeguards for the prevention of accidents which may cause
environmental pollution and remedial measures for such accidents;
g. laying down procedures and safeguards for the handling of hazardous substances;
h. examination of such manufacturing processes, materials and substances as are likely to
cause environmental pollution;
i. carrying out and sponsoring investigations and research relating to problems of
environmental pollution;
j. inspection of any premises, plant, equipment, machinery, manufacturing or other processes,
materials or substances and giving, by order, of such directions to such authorities, officers or
https://www.legalbites.in/environmental-protection-act1986/ 4/10
9/26/2020 Environment Protection Act,1986 (Overview)
persons as it may consider necessary to take steps for the prevention, control and abatement
of environmental pollution;
k. establishment or recognition of environmental laboratories and institutes to carry out the
functions entrusted to such environmental laboratories and institutes under this Act;
l. collection and dissemination of information in respect of matters relating to environmental
pollution;
m. preparation of manuals, codes or guides relating to the prevention, control and abatement of
environmental pollution;
n. such other matters as the Central Government deems necessary or expedient for the
purpose of securing the effective implementation of the provisions of this Act.
The Central Government may, if it considers it necessary or expedient so to do for the purpose of this Act, by
order, published in the Official Gazette, constitute an authority or authorities by such name or names as may
be specified in the order for the purpose of exercising and performing such of the powers and functions
(including the power to issue directions under section (5) of the Central Government under this Act.
And for taking measures with respect to such of the matters referred to in sub-section (2) as may be
mentioned in the order and subject to the supervision and control of the Central Government and the
provisions of such order, such authority or authorities may exercise any powers or perform the functions or
take the measures so mentioned in the order as if such authority or authorities had been empowered by this
Act to exercise those powers or perform those functions or take such measures.
As considerable adverse environmental impact has been caused due to the degradation of the
environment with excessive soil erosion and water and air pollution due to certain development
activities therefore it is necessary to protect the environment.
This can be achieved only by careful assessment of a project proposed to be located in any area, on the
basis of an environmental impact assessment and environmental management plan for the prevention,
elimination or mitigation of the adverse impacts, right from the inception stage of the project.
The Central Government has passed certain notifications laying that the expansion or modernization of any
existing industry or new projects listed shall not be undertaken in any part of India unless it gets
environmental clearance by the Central Government or the State Government.
https://www.legalbites.in/environmental-protection-act1986/ 5/10
9/26/2020 Environment Protection Act,1986 (Overview)
The Act does not curtail the powers of the Supreme Court. It has from time to time in various matters issued
directions and orders to control pollution. Some such important cases pertaining to the protection of the
environment are:
In Mehta v. Union of India (1998) 6 SCC 63, in order to control the chaotic traffic conditions and vehicular
pollution, the Supreme Court issued the following directions.
a. All commercial/transport vehicles which are more than 20 years old should be phased out
and not permitted to ply in Delhi after October 1998
b. All such commercial /transport vehicles which are 17 to 19 years old (3200) shall not be
permitted to ply in the National Capital Territory, Delhi after 1998;
c. Such of the commercial /transport vehicles which are 15 and 16 years old (4962) shall not be
permitted to ply after December 31, 1998
The Supreme Court made this order applies to all commercial/transport vehicles whether registered in the
National Capital Territory of Delhi or outside (but ply in Delhi) which are of more than stipulated age and
which do not have any authority to ply in Delhi.
In Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India (1996 AIR 1446), the Supreme Court in regard
to the 600 km long coastline emphasized that it would be the duty and responsibility of the coastal states and
Union Territories in which the stretch exists, to see that the notifications issued, declaring the coastal
stretches should be properly and duly implemented.
Further, the various restrictions on the setting up and expansion of industries, operation or process, etc. in
the regulation Zone should be strictly enforced.
In the same case, the court enunciated the principle further that the polluter pays. Once the activity
carried on is hazardous or inherently dangerous, the person carrying on such activity is liable to
make good the loss caused to any other person irrespective of the fact whether he took reasonable
care while carrying on his activity.
Under this principle, it is not the role of the Government to meet the costs involved in either prevention of
such damage or in carrying out remedial action, because the effect of this would be to shift the financial
burden of the pollution incident on the taxpayer. The responsibility of repairing the damage is that of the
offending industry.
https://www.legalbites.in/environmental-protection-act1986/ 6/10
9/26/2020 Environment Protection Act,1986 (Overview)
Other cases
In Vellore Citizen Welfare Forum v. Union of India & others (AIR 1996 SC 2715) the polluter principle as
interpreted by the Supreme Court means that the absolute liability for harm to the environment extends not
only to compensate the victims of pollution but also the cost of restoring the environmental degradation.
Remediation of the damaged environment is part of the process of “Sustainable Development” and as such
polluter is liable to pay the cost to the individual sufferer as well as the cost of reversing the damaged
ecology.
In Goa Foundation v. Diksha Holdings Pvt. Ltd (1999 (2) BomCR 550) the court observed that with a view
to protecting the ecological balance in the coastal areas, notifications having been issued by the Central
Government, there ought not to be any violation and prohibited activities should not be allowed to come up
within the area declared as CRZ notification.
The court also emphasised that no activities which would ultimately lead to unscientific and unsustainable
development and ecological destruction should be allowed.
Chapter III of the EPA deals with the prevention, Control and abetment of Environmental Pollution. Some
important provisions of this chapter provide that, No person carrying on any industry, operation or process
shall discharge or emit or permit to be discharged or emitted any environmental pollutant in excess of such
standards as may be prescribed.
No person shall handle or cause to be handled any hazardous substance except in accordance with such
procedure and after complying with such safeguards as may be prescribed.
Where the discharge of any environmental pollutant in excess of the prescribed standards occurs or is
apprehended to occur due to an accident or other unforeseen act or event, the person responsible for such
discharge and the person in charge of the place at which the discharge occurs shall be bound to prevent or
mitigate the environmental pollution, and shall also:
The expenses incurred by any authority or agency may be recovered from the person concerned as arrears
of land revenue or of public demand.
https://www.legalbites.in/environmental-protection-act1986/ 7/10
9/26/2020 Environment Protection Act,1986 (Overview)
Penalties
Section 15 provides for Penalties for contravention of the provisions of the Act as well as the Rules, Orders
and Directions. Whoever fails to comply with or contravenes any of the provisions, rules, orders or directions
of this Act shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or with fine which
may extend to one lakh rupees, or with both.
In case the failure or contravention continues, with additional fine which may extend to five thousand
rupees for every day during which such failure or contravention continues.
If the failure or contravention continues beyond a period of one year after the date of conviction, the offender
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which, may extend to seven years. • Offences by
Companies
Offences by Companies are dealt with under Section16. Where an offence is committed by a company, every
person who, at the time the offence was committed, was directly in charge of and was responsible to, the
company for the conduct of the business of the company shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence.
If he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised due diligence to
prevent the commission of such offence he shall not be liable to any punishment.
Where the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of or is attributable to any neglect on
part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officers of the company, such person shall be deemed to be
guilty of the offence
As per the provisions of Section 19 of the EPA, no court shall take cognizance of any offence under this Act
except on a complaint made by:
a. the central Government or any authority or officer authorized in this behalf by that
Government; or
b. any person who has given notice of not less than 60 days, of the alleged offence and his
intention to make a complaint, to the Central Government or the authority or officer,
authorized.
Section 22 provides that no civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of
anything done, action is taken or order or direction issued by the Central Government or any other authority
https://www.legalbites.in/environmental-protection-act1986/ 8/10
9/26/2020 Environment Protection Act,1986 (Overview)
The National Environment Appellate Authority (NEAA) was set up as an independent body to address
cases in which environmental clearances granted by the ministry of the environment are challenged by civil
society.
On January 30, 1997, the President of India, in the exercise of the powers conferred under Article 123 (123.
Power of President to promulgate Ordinances during recess of Parliament.—
(1) If at any time, except when both Houses of Parliament are in session, the President is satisfied that
circumstances exist which render it necessary for him to take immediate action, he may promulgate such
Ordinances as the circumstances appear to him to require of the Constitution,
promulgated an Ordinance to provide for the establishment of the NEAA to hear appeals with respect to
restriction of areas in which any industries, operations and processes shall not be carried out or shall be
carried out subject to the safeguards as provided under the EPA.
The Ordinance was later on repealed with the enactment of the National Environment Appellate
Authority Act, 1997. The NEAA Act, which was granted presidential assent on 26th March 1997
came into force from 9.4.97. This Act provides for the establishment of a NEAA. The Act was
enacted with the following object:
To hear appeals with respect to restriction of areas in which any industry, operations or processes or class of
industries, operations or processes shall not be carried out or shall be carried out subject to certain
safeguards under the EPA and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
This is to bring in transparency in the process, accountability and to ensure smooth and expeditious
implementation of developmental schemes and projects. Jurisdiction of the Act
Any aggrieved person may file an appeal within thirty days of passing of an order granting
environmental clearance in the areas in which any industries, operations or processes shall not be
carried out or shall be carried out subject to certain safeguards under the EPA.
It is further provided that the Authority may entertain an appeal even after the expiry of the said term
if a sufficient cause for delay in filing such an appeal exists.
https://www.legalbites.in/environmental-protection-act1986/ 9/10
9/26/2020 Environment Protection Act,1986 (Overview)
The Authority is required to dispose of the appeal within ninety days from the date of filing of the same.
However, the Authority may, for reasons that are to be recorded in writing, dispose of the appeal within a
further period of thirty days.
(2) An Ordinance promulgated under this article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of
Parliament, but every such Ordinance—
a. shall be laid before both Houses of Parliament and shall cease to operate at the expiration of
six weeks from the reassembly of Parliament, or, if before the expiration of that period
resolutions disapproving it are passed by both Houses, upon the passing of the second of
those resolutions; and
b. may be withdrawn at any time by the President.
Explanation.—Where the Houses of Parliament are summoned to reassemble on different dates, the period
of six weeks shall be reckoned from the later of those dates for the purposes of this clause.
(3) If and so far as an Ordinance under this article makes any provision which Parliament would not under
this Constitution be competent to enact, it shall be void.
Sources:
https://www.legalbites.in/environmental-protection-act1986/ 10/10