100% found this document useful (1 vote)
5K views14 pages

SSPC Guide 6

Uploaded by

alfian leoanak
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
5K views14 pages

SSPC Guide 6

Uploaded by

alfian leoanak
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

SSPC-Guide 6

May 4, 2015
Editorial Revision April 13, 2018

SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings


Technology Guide No. 6
GUIDE FOR CONTAINING SURFACE PREPARATION DEBRIS
GENERATED DURING PAINT REMOVAL OPERATIONS

1. SCOPE collecting the debris. Controlling airborne particulate and other


emissions may be necessary to comply with federal, state, and
1.1 This guide describes methods of paint removal, local regulations.
containment systems, and procedures for minimizing or
preventing emissions from escaping the work area, and 2.2 OUTLINE OF GUIDE
procedures for assessing the adequacy of the controls over
emissions. 2.2.1 Procedures Included in this guide:
• Selecting Methods of Surface Preparation and Debris
1.2 The containment systems are categorized in up to four Collection (Section 4.1)
classes per type of paint removal method, based on the extent • Specifying Containment Systems (Section 4.2)
to which emissions are controlled. • Selecting Methods for Assessing the Quantity of
Emissions (Section 4.3)
1.3 This guide is primarily intended for use with steel • Implementing Containment Project (Section 4.4)
structures; however, some of the methods and materials
may be suited for use on concrete, aluminum, wood, or other 2.2.2 The guide also includes descriptions and
materials of construction. commentaries on:
• Methods of Coating Removal (Section 5.1)
1.4 This guide is intended for use by facility owners, • Methods of Collecting Debris (Section 5.2)
specifiers, designers, and contractors. It may also be used by • Containment Enclosure Components (Section 5.3)
other interested parties. • Ventilation System Components (Section 5.4)
• Methods for Assessing Quantity of Emissions (Section
1.5 A discussion of ventilation is included in the guide to 5.5)
assist users in both controlling emissions to the environment,
and in enhancing worker protection and visibility within the 2.3 DEFINITIONS
containment. It is important to recognize that ventilation
systems alone may or may not be sufficient to fully protect 2.3.1 Action Level for Lead: Employee exposure, without
workers when the paint being removed contains lead or other regard to the use of respirators, to an airborne concentration
toxic metals, and additional work practice and/or administrative of lead of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30 µg/m3)
controls and respiratory protection may be required to control calculated as an eight-hour TWA per OSHA General Industry
worker exposures. Requirements or evaluation methods for Standard 29 CFR 1910.1025 and OSHA Construction Industry
worker health and safety are outside the scope of this guide. Standard 29 CFR 1926.62.

Note: When toxic metals are referenced in the Guide, lead 2.3.2 Containment System: A containment system
is often used as the example. This should not be construed includes the cover panels, screens, tarps, scaffolds, supports,
to imply that lead is the only toxic metal contained in paints and shrouds used to enclose an entire work area or a paint
or abrasives, or that lead is the only toxic metal addressed in removal tool. The purpose is to minimize or prevent the debris
regulations. A number of toxic metals may be present in paint generated during surface preparation from entering into the
and abrasives, and regulations are available to address many environment, and to facilitate the controlled collection of the
of them. debris for disposal. Containment systems may also employ the
use of ground covers or water booms.
2. DESCRIPTION AND DEFINITIONS
2.3.3 Emissions: When used in this guide, emissions
2.1 GENERAL: During surface preparation, airborne from the containment that require control include airborne
particulate and debris from the removal of paint (particularly plumes of material, as well as spills or leaks of water, abrasive,
paints containing lead, cadmium, and chromate pigments) can paint chips, and debris.
contaminate the air, soil, and water surrounding work sites. The
potential environmental hazards are reduced by minimizing 2.3.3 Ventilation System: Ventilation systems include
or eliminating the airborne particulate, and by containing and both natural ventilation and mechanical ventilation (fans,

1
SSPC-Guide 6
May 4, 2015
Editorial Revision April 13, 2018
hoods, and duct work), to provide air movement across the 3.4 U. S. CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS:1
work area, and dust collectors to clean the discharged air.
29 CFR Safety and Health Regulations for
2.3.4 PM-10: Particulate matter (dust) less than 10 1926.57 Construction, Subpart D – Occupational
micrometers (0.39 mils) in aerodynamic equivalent diameter. Health and Environmental Controls
(Aerodynamic equivalent diameter is defined as the diameter (Ventilation)
of a unit density sphere having the same settling velocity as
29 CFR Safety and Health Regulations for
the particle in question, regardless of its shape and density.)
1926.62 Construction, Subpart D – Occupational
2.3.5 Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for Lead: Health and Environmental Controls (Lead)
Maximum allowable employee average exposure per OSHA 29 CFR Occupational Safety and Health Standards
General Industry Standard 29 CFR 1910.1025 and OSHA 910.1025 Subpart Z – Toxic and Hazardous
Construction Industry Standard 29 CFR 1926.62. Substances (Lead)

2.3.6 Time Weighted Average (TWA): Concentrations of 3.5 AMERICAN CONFERENCE OF GOVERNMENTAL
airborne toxic materials that have been weighted for a certain INDUSTRIAL HYGIENISTS:2
time duration, usually eight hours.
* Industrial Ventilation – A Manual of Recommended
Practice
2.3.7 Impenetrable: Impervious to dust and wind.

3.6 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE


2.3.8 Impermeable: Impervious to water.
(ANSI):3

3. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
* ANSI Z9.2 Fundamentals Governing the
(1979) Design and Operation of Local
3.1 The latest issue, revision, or amendment of the
Exhaust Systems
referenced standards in effect on the date of invitation to bid
shall govern, unless otherwise specified. Standards marked * ANSI Z9.2 (2001) Fundamentals Governing the
with an asterisk (*) are referenced only in the Notes, which are Design and Operation of Exhaust
not requirements of this specification. Systems
* ANSI/AIHA Exhaust Systems - Abrasive
3.2 If there is a conflict between the requirements of any Z9.4 (1997) Blasting Operations – Ventilation
of the cited referenced standards and this specification, the and Safe Practice
requirements of this specification shall prevail.
NOTE: New governmental regulations or amendments 3.7 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION4
to existing ones become effective as scheduled by the
governmental agency, independent of the date of bid. NFPA 701 Standard Methods of Fire Tests for
Flame Propagation of Textiles and
3.3 SSPC: THE SOCIETY FOR PROTECTIVE Films
COATINGS
4. PROCEDURES
AB 2 Specification for Cleanliness of Recycled
Ferrous Metallic Abrasives 4.1 SELECTING METHODS OF SURFACE
PREPARATION AND DEBRIS COLLECTION
Guide 7 Guide for the Disposal of Lead-
Contaminated Surface Preparation Debris
4.1.1 Surface Preparation Method: Prior to selecting and
Guide 16 Guide to Selection of Dust Collectors specifying a containment system, it is necessary to determine
Guide 18 Specifier’s Guide for Determining the method to be used for surface preparation of the steel.
Containment Class and Environmental Considerations for selecting surface preparation follow.
Monitoring Strategies for Lead-Paint
Removal Projects 4.1.1.1 Coatings can be removed from the surface by a
TU 7 Conducting Ambient Air, Soil, and Water variety of techniques. These include:
Sampling During Surface Preparation and
• Abrasive blasting (e.g. open blasting with
Paint Disturbance Activities
expendable abrasives, open blasting with
1
Downloads from the Code of Federal Regulations are available at <http://www.ecfr.gov
2
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 1330 Kemper Meadow Drive,
Cincinnati, OH 45240, phone 513-742-2020 <http://www.acgih.org>
3
American National Standards Institute, 1819 L Street. NW, Suite 600, Washington DC 036.
Standards available online from <http://www.ansi.org>
4
National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy MA 02169. Standards
available from <http://www.nfpa.org>

2
SSPC-Guide 6
May 4, 2015
Editorial Revision April 13, 2018
reusable abrasives, vacuum [closed] blasting classes. SSPC-TU 7 provides additional information about
with reusable abrasives, nonrecirculating closed selecting and specifying monitoring requirements,
blast systems).
• Water blasting and pressurized waterjetting (with 4.2.2 Containment System Classes: The classifications
or without abrasives). described below vary in the degree to which the containment
• Chemical stripping. design can be effective in controlling emissions of dust and
• Hand and power tool cleaning (with and without debris into the environment. Note that emissions requiring
localized exhaust). control include spills and leaks of material in addition to plumes
of airborne dust and debris.
4.1.1.2 Methods vary significantly in their productivity, The degree of emissions control is greatest for Class 1
degree of cleanliness and surface profile achieved, utility and and least for Class 4. Selection of a containment system with
support requirements, dust and waste produced, clean-up greater emission control capability is required for surface prep-
required, and costs. For example, open abrasive blasting aration methods that produce the greatest quantity of dust and
with expendable abrasives requires the greatest quantity debris. Containments with lesser emissions control capability
of abrasive and produces the greatest quantity of dust and are required for surface preparation methods that produce
debris. Methods that do not utilize abrasive generally produce lesser quantities of dust and debris. For each containment
the least amount of dust and debris. system described in this Guide, the Class designation (Class 1,
NOTE: The toxicity characteristic of the waste is 2, 3, or 4) is provided first, followed by a letter. The letter repre-
independent of the volume of the waste generated (e.g., paint sents the method of preparation (A – abrasive blast cleaning,
chips alone or paint chips combined with abrasive). It should W – wet methods of preparation, C – chemical stripping, and
also be noted that the abrasive used for abrasive blast cleaning P – hand and power tool cleaning). For example, a Class 1
might contain toxic components. containment for abrasive blast cleaning (designated 1A)
involves the use of more elaborate containment components
4.1.1.3 Before specifying a method of surface preparation, than Class 1 for power tool cleaning (designated 1P). For this
the manufacturer of the coating to be applied should be reason, individual tables have been prepared to identify the
consulted to assure that the degree of cleaning and surface containment components for each of the classes according to
profile produced will be satisfactory for coating system the type of removal method.
performance. When vacuum shrouding is employed around the removal
tool, controls equivalent to Class 1 may be achieved through
4.1.2 Methods for Collecting Debris: Debris may be the use of ground covers or free hanging tarpaulins.
collected from the surface at the point of cleaning (e.g., with
vacuum) or from the general work area. The collection method 4.2.2.1 Class 1: This system provides the highest level of
should be selected in conjunction with the paint removal method emissions control.
and the containment system design to assure a completely For abrasive blast cleaning, Class 1A normally requires
integrated operation. The debris should be collected on a air-impenetrable walls, ceiling, and floors as applicable; with
regular basis and not left to accumulate over the course of a rigid or flexible framing, fully sealed joints, airlock or resealable
job. Methods of collecting debris are described in Section 5.2. entryways, negative air pressure achieved by forced or natural
In addition to collecting debris within containment, debris air flow (verified by instrument or visual monitoring), and
that escapes the contained area should be removed on a exhaust air filtration.
routine basis (e.g., end of work day, or as specified) to prevent For wet methods of preparation, Class 1W normally
winds or rain from carrying it onto surrounding property, into requires water-impermeable walls, ceiling, and floors with rigid
soil, ground, or storm sewers, or into bodies of water. or flexible framing; fully sealed joints, resealable entryways,
negative air pressure achieved by forced or natural air flow
4.2 SPECIFYING CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS (verified visually), and exhaust air filtration.
For chemical stripping, Class 1C normally requires water-
4.2.1 The facility owner or representative should specify impermeable and chemical-resistant walls, ceiling, and floors,
the class of containment required and/or the environmental as applicable; and floors with rigid or flexible framing, fully
monitoring criteria that will be used to verify the containment’s sealed joints and overlapping entryways, and forced or natural
effectiveness. The specified containment should be maintained air flow with exhaust air filtration. When pressure washing is
in accordance with the approved design throughout the used to remove the dislodged paint, it may be necessary to
course of surface preparation. Because of uncertainties in the specify one of the containments from Table W for the control of
measurement and significance of containment efficiencies, the water and waste.
it is not a good practice to simply specify a level or percent For hand or power tool cleaning, Class 1P normally
of containment. Methods for specifying containment systems requires air-impenetrable walls with rigid or flexible framing,
and items that should be considered are found in Sections fully sealed joints, resealable entryways, negative air pressure
4.2.2 and 4.2.3. Containment for paint application is beyond achieved through forced or natural air flow (verified visually)
the scope of this guide. SSPC Guide 18 provides additional and exhaust air filtration.
information about selecting and specifying containment

3
SSPC-Guide 6
May 4, 2015
Editorial Revision April 13, 2018
4.2.2.2 Class 2: This system provides a high level of 4.2.2.5 Containment Class Tables: Tables A, W, C, and
emissions control. P list various containment and ventilation components that
For abrasive blast cleaning, Class 2A normally utilizes can be utilized to achieve these different classes. Table A is
air-impenetrable walls, ceiling, and floors, as applicable; with used for abrasive blast cleaning, Table W for water blasting/
rigid or flexible framing, fully sealed joints, partially sealed waterjetting, Table C for chemical stripping, and Table P for
entryways, negative air pressure achieved by forced or natural hand or power tool cleaning. The components are described
air flow (verified visually), and exhaust air filtration. in Sections 5.3 and 5.4. Note that other combinations of
For wet methods of preparation, Class 2W normally containment and ventilation components may provide dust and
requires water-impermeable walls, ceiling, and floors, as debris control similar to those suggested in the tables.
applicable; rigid or flexible framing, fully sealed joints,
overlapping entryways, and natural air flow. 4.2.3 Other Considerations in Specifying and Selecting
For chemical stripping, Class 2C normally requires water- Containment Systems:
impermeable and chemical-resistant walls, ceiling, and floors, a. Type of structure (simple flat plate or beams
as applicable; and floors with rigid or flexible framing, fully versus complex trusses and joists).
sealed joints, overlapping entryways, and natural air flow. b. Load-bearing capacity (live, dead) and integrity
When pressure washing is used to remove the dislodged paint, of the containment system, attachments, and of
it may be necessary to specify one of the containments from the structure. NOTE: Containment systems may
Table W for the control of the water and waste. need to be reviewed by a registered professional
For hand or power tool cleaning, Class 2P normally engineer prior to erection and use to confirm the
requires air-penetrable or -impenetrable walls, ceiling, and structural adequacy of the containment and the
floors, as applicable; rigid or flexible framing, fully sealed joints, effect of various loads imposed.
overlapping or open seam entryways, and natural air flow. c. Size and elevation of structure (e.g., elevated
water tank, small secondary bridge, etc.).
4.2.2.3 Class 3: This system provides a moderate level of d. Location of structure (e.g., rural, urban, over
emissions control. water, etc.).
For abrasive blast cleaning, Class 3A normally utilizes e. Proximity to other buildings, structures, operating
air-penetrable walls, ceiling, and floors, as applicable; with equipment, and traffic. Tight confines may not
rigid or flexible framing, partially sealed joints and entryways, permit the construction of certain containment
and exhaust air filtration. devices.
For wet methods of preparation, Class 3W normally f. Local climate (e.g., heavy winds, rain, snow,
requires water-impermeable walls, ceiling and floors, as etc.).
applicable; minimal framing, partially sealed joints, open seam g. Permitting. The construction of containment
entryways, and natural airflow. devices may be regulated by codes.
For chemical stripping, Class 3C normally requires water- h. Construction of structure (such as riveted or
impermeable and chemical-resistant walls, ceiling, and floors, welded). On certain structures, the welding of
as applicable; minimal framing, partially sealed joints, open containment system brackets adjacent to riveted
seam entryways and natural airflow. When pressure washing seams should be avoided.
is used to remove the dislodged paint, it may be necessary to i. Additional work to be performed inside
specify one of the containments from Table W for the control of containment (e.g., the control of paint overspray).
the water and waste.
4.3 SELECTING METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE
For hand or power tool cleaning, Class 3P normally
QUANTITY OF EMISSIONS
requires air-penetrable walls, ceiling, and floors, as applicable;
minimal framing, partially sealed joints, open seam entryways,
4.3.1 The specifier should select one or more of the
and natural air flow.
following methods for monitoring the amount of dust or debris
that escapes the work area. These methods are described in
4.2.2.4 Class 4: This system provides a minimal level of
SSPC-TU 7.
emissions control.
Method A: Visible Emissions
For abrasive blast cleaning, Class 4A normally utilizes
Method B: Ambient Air Monitoring for PM-10
air-penetrable walls, ceiling, and floors, as applicable, with
Method C: Occupational Monitoring of Area Emissions
flexible framing, open seams and entryways, and natural
of Lead
airflow.
Method D: Ambient Air Monitoring for Toxic Metals
For wet methods of preparation, Class 4W utilizes water-
(TSP Lead)
permeable walls, ceiling, and floors, as applicable; with flexible
Method E: Soil Analysis for Toxic Metals
framing and natural air flow to collect dislodged debris while
Method F: Water and Sediment Analysis for Toxic Metals
allowing the water to pass though. For chemical stripping, this
class is not applicable.
4.3.2 If one or more of the methods is specified, the
For hand or power tool cleaning, this class is not applicable.
specification should identify the method selected, the frequency

4
SSPC-Guide 6
May 4, 2015
Editorial Revision April 13, 2018
and duration of the tests that will be employed, the location of
the monitors (in the case of instrument monitoring), and the 5.1.1 Hand Tool Cleaning: Include chipping hammers,
acceptance criteria. scrapers, wire brushes, and sandpaper.

4.4 IMPLEMENTING CONTAINMENT PROJECT 5.1.2 Power Tool Cleaning: Power tools are of two
general types:
4.4.1 Preparation of Written Specification: The specifier
should incorporate the information derived in 4.1 through 4.3 5.2.1.1 Grinding Tools: Any rotary or reciprocating hand-
in a written document that clearly defines what is required of held tool that uses bonded abrasives as the cutting media.
the contractor, what is to be furnished by the owner, and how Examples include but are not limited to reciprocating sanders,
the work will be evaluated. It is also recommended that the orbital sanders, or any grinding device, whether right angle or
specifier identify applicable regulations, codes, ordinances, straight shaft, that utilizes abrasive cloths, discs, wheels, or
etc., and the associated enforcement agencies. In addition, flaps.
the document should include names of key contacts and
provisions for resolving disputes. 5.2.1.2 Impact tools: Any rotary or reciprocating hand-
held tool that uses repetitious impact to create the specified
4.4.2 Implementation of Containment and Monitoring: surface cleanliness. Examples include but are not limited to
A high level of involvement by the owner either directly or rotary flap, cutter bundle, needle gun, wire bristle impact, and
through knowledgeable designates should be maintained hammer flail assemblies.
throughout the course of the project, should it become
necessary to modify the specific terms of the specification, 5.1.3 Power Tool Cleaning with Localized Exhaust:
such as the paint removal methods employed, the design and Includes power tools that contain integral vacuum-equipped
construction of the containment, or the methods for monitoring shrouding. A brush or rubber sleeve on the shrouding
the emissions. conforms to the surface to enhance the control of dust and
debris collection.
4.4.3 Project Documentation: It is vital that the facility
owner be provided with accurate and complete records of all the 5.1.4 Waterjetting Without Abrasive: Includes all types
documents and activities; including specifications, inspection of pressurized waterjetting systems. The action of the water
and work reports, change orders, weather conditions, with or without cleaning solutions or rust inhibitors provides
various mitigating factors, contractor suppliers, activities by the cleaning. Pressures are as stated by the manufacturer of
regulatory agencies in monitoring or guiding the work, disposal the equipment. Note that when removing hazardous paints,
records and test results and data derived from containment, high pressures and certain cleaning solutions may cause the
ventilation, air, soil, and other monitoring. These records and hazardous substances to be carried with the water. This water
data are invaluable in evaluating the quality of the work and in should be recycled or collected and disposed of properly.
determining conformance with the specifications. In addition, Waterjetting at pressures from 70 to 210 MPa (10,000 to
they can be added to the database being developed by the 30,000 psi) is often called high-pressure waterjetting, and,
protective coatings industry on the most cost-effective and at pressures over 210 MPa (30,000 psi), ultra high-pressure
efficient means of debris containment. waterjetting.

4.4.4 Disposal of Debris: Surface preparation debris 5.1.5 Waterjetting With Abrasive: Includes pressurized
(e.g., spent abrasives and containment materials that cannot waterjetting systems with abrasive injection. Variations may
be reused), must be disposed of in accordance with Federal mix abrasive and water in a separate tank or at the nozzle,
and state regulations on solid and hazardous waste. For more or inject abrasive into the water stream. Pressures required
information, see SSPC-Guide 7. as stated by the manufacturer of the equipment. Note that
when removing hazardous paints, high pressures and certain
4.4.5 Cleaning of Reusable Equipment and Materials: cleaning solutions or rust inhibitors may cause the hazardous
Loose surface lead dust should be removed from equipment, substances to be carried with the water. This water should be
containment materials, and other reusable items prior to recycled or collected and disposed of properly. Waterjetting at
transportation off-site. pressures from 70 to 210 MPa (10,000 to 30,000 psi) is often
called high-pressure waterjetting, and, at pressures over 210
5. DESCRIPTIONS OF METHODS AND SYSTEMS MPa (30,000 psi), ultra high-pressure waterjetting.

5.1 METHODS OF COATING REMOVAL: The 5.1.6 Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning: Includes compressed
following is a list of methods that can be used successfully air blasting systems that incorporate water into the blast stream.
to remove coatings and to collect the debris. Mists, dusts, Variations may mix abrasive and water in a separate tank or
and debris created may or may not contain toxic metals. All at the nozzle, or apply the water to the abrasive as it exits the
waste discharges should be tested for hazardous waste nozzle. Pressures are required as stated by the manufacturer
characteristics. The list is not considered to be all-inclusive, as of the equipment. Note that when removing hazardous paints,
new and innovative methods are continually being developed.

5
SSPC-Guide 6
May 4, 2015
Editorial Revision April 13, 2018
high pressures and certain cleaning solutions or rust inhibitors such as cloth or paper to the surface after application to
may cause the hazardous substances to be carried with the prevent evaporation. The softened paint is removed by
water. This water should be collected and disposed of properly. peeling the cover or by hand scraping. Washing, flushing,
and neutralization of the surface may be required, as well as
5.1.7 Open Abrasive Blast Cleaning with Expendable collection of the rinsings for proper disposal. NOTE: Chemical
Abrasives: Blast cleaning using compressed air to propel stripping solutions themselves can be hazardous and may
abrasives through nozzles. The spent abrasives, paint, debris, require special handling and disposal.
trash, etc. are collected for disposal. Expendable abrasives
are those, which are not normally reused after the initial blast. 5.2 METHODS OF COLLECTING DEBRIS: Methods
CAUTION: Some expendable abrasives may contain toxic of collection include, but are not limited to, the following:
metals.
5.2.1 Localized Collection at Point of Cleaning: This
5.1.8 Open Abrasive Blast Cleaning with Reusable method involves surrounding the coating removal equipment
Abrasives: Blast cleaning using compressed air to propel with a localized containment enclosure equipped with a
abrasives through nozzles, except that the abrasives are vacuum (i.e. localized exhaust) to permit the collection of the
collected, cleaned of paint and debris, and reused. The debris as it is being generated. The localized containment or
abrasive reclaimer (collection and cleaning equipment) may chamber should conform to the surface (e.g., to irregularities
be an integral part of the blast machine or it may be housed in such as welds, angles, and appurtenances as well as flat
a separate machine. Blasting and abrasive reclamation may surfaces) through the use of masks, brushes, or other suitable
operate simultaneously or independently. The use of re-usable means that will minimize the escape of abrasive, dust, paint,
abrasives may reduce the volume of waste by a factor of 50 or or debris. This method may be more effective in controlling
more compared to expendable abrasives. emissions when used on large open structures, such as tank
shells, as compared with complex structures, such as joists or
5.1.9 Closed Abrasive Blast Cleaning with Re-Usable
trusses. The vacuum machine may be an integral part of the
Abrasives: Blast cleaning using compressed air or centrifugal
coating removal equipment or abrasive reclaimer, or may be a
wheels within a vacuum assembly to propel abrasives toward
separate machine, but coating removal and vacuuming must
a surface and simultaneously remove the abrasive and debris.
be accomplished simultaneously.
Once the collected abrasives are cleaned of paint and debris,
they are reused. Reusable abrasives may reduce the volume
5.2.2 General Area Collection: This method of collection
of waste by a factor of 50 or more compared to expendable
involves the removal of spent abrasive and paint debris from
abrasives. Systems can be recirculating or non-recirculating.
a containment structure that encloses the work area, workers,
and tools, rather than only enclosing the removal tool itself.
5.1.9.1 Vacuum Blasting: Blast cleaning using
Collection methods include, but are not limited to:
compressed air to propel abrasives toward a surface. A special
vacuum assembly equipped with a brush or rubber sleeve
5.2.2.1 Bulk Collection: Collection of debris from ground
surrounds the blast nozzle, sealing it to the surface. The seal
covers, floor, deck, or structure components, either during or
must be maintained between the assembly and the surface
after surface preparation. Collection may include the use of
to create a completely closed blasting cycle. The abrasive is
brooms, magnetic brooms, brushes, shovels, wheelbarrows,
recirculated automatically, cleaned of paint and debris, and
buckets, bucket loaders, vacuums, vacuum trucks, conveyors,
returned for reuse.
or other suitable means. Note that in the case of hazardous
paint removal, OSHA regulations place restrictions on the use
5.1.9.2 Wheel Blast Cleaning: Blast cleaning wheel
of some of these methods.
assemblies that propel abrasive to the surface using centrifugal
force. A special vacuum assembly with a mask that seals the
5.2.2.2 Channeling: Controlling the flow of debris in the
centrifugal wheel assembly to the surface is required. The seal
direction of a central removal location is accomplished by the
must be maintained between the assembly and the surface
use of tarps, rigid panels, augers, funnels, or other suitable
to create a completely closed blasting cycle. The abrasive is
materials or equipment. The materials should be selected
recirculated automatically, cleaned of paint and debris, and
with consideration of the nature of the debris being channeled
returned for reuse.
(e.g. water, chemical stripper, dry particulate, etc.). At the
removal location, further collection may be accomplished
5.1.9.3 Mechanical Non-Recirculating Blast System:
using mechanical conveyors, vacuums, or other means. The
Equipment that shrouds the blast nozzle to contain and remove
channeling materials and equipment may be a part of, or
the debris. The abrasive may or may not be reused. If it is
independent of, the containment structure.
reused, cleaning the debris from the abrasive is accomplished
as a separate operation.
5.2.3 Work Site Collection: This method of collection
involves the removal of spent abrasive and paint debris from
5.1.10 Chemical Stripping: Use of chemical stripping
the work site and surrounding property outside of containment.
solutions or slurries applied to the paint surface. Effectiveness
Collection should occur on a routine basis (e.g., at the end of
of the chemicals may be enhanced by applying a cover

6
SSPC-Guide 6
May 4, 2015
Editorial Revision April 13, 2018
each work day, or as specified) to prevent dispersion by wind 5.3.2.6 Type B4 – Chemical-Resistant: Material that is
or rain. The bulk collection methods described in 5.2.2.1 are resistant to chemical stripping solutions and impermeable to
suitable for this purpose. the water used for rinsing.

5.3 CONTAINMENT ENCLOSURE COMPONENTS: 5.3.3 Support Structure


The components of containment enclosures are identified
below. Consideration should be given to the use of flame 5.3.3.1 Type C1 - Rigid Support Structures: These
retardant materials when applicable. Tables A, W, C, and P structures allow no movement and are comprised of scaffolding
provide guidance on combining each of the components to and framing to which the containment materials are affixed.
design a containment system. Specifiers should research local
regulations and jobsite conditions regarding the use of flame- 5.3.3.2 Type C2 - Flexible Support Structures: These
retardant materials. NFPA 701 provides an example of the structures allow minor movement and are comprised of cables,
testing that can be required. chains, or similar systems to which the containment materials
are affixed.
5.3.1 Containment Materials
5.3.3.3 Type C3 - Minimal Support Structures: These
5.3.1.1 Type A1 - Rigid: Containment materials consist structures involve little to no supporting structure beyond
of single panels, interlocking panels, or modular fabrications cables or chains required to affix the containment materials to
constructed of plywood, aluminum, rigid metal, plastic, or the structure itself and perhaps to the floor or ground.
similar materials.
5.3.4 Treatment of Joints (Mating Surfaces)
5.3.1.2 Type A2 - Flexible: Containment materials are
comprised of screens, tarps, drapes, plastic sheeting, or 5.3.4.1 Type D1 - Fully Sealed Joints: All mating joints
similar materials. between the containment materials and the structure and floor,
ceiling, abutment, deck, or ground are sealed. Penetrations
5.3.2 Penetrability of Containment Materials through the containment, such as those around ductwork and
hoses, are also sealed. Sealing includes overlapping of seams
5.3.2.1 Type B1 - Air-impenetrable: Materials that are when using flexible materials and the use of stitching, taping,
impervious to dust or wind, including, but not limited to: caulking, or other sealing measures. Consideration should
• Tarps or Drapes: Formed or coated woven be given to the chemical or water resistance of the sealing
material free of holes or openings. materials as appropriate.
• Plastic Sheeting: Single or double ply, heavy wall
construction plastic. Reinforced plastic may be 5.3.4.2 Type D2 - Partially Sealed Joints: The
necessary for some applications. containment materials are mated together. The use of
• Panels: Panels of plywood, aluminum, overlapping seams is recommended, but complete sealing of
corrugated plastic, metal, or similar rigid all joints is not required.
materials. NOTE: Openings in materials reduce
recovery efficiencies. 5.3.5 Entryways

5.3.5.1 Type E1 - Entryway Through Airlocks with


5.3.2.2 Type B2a - Air-penetrable–Tightly Woven:
Resealable Doors: This entry system includes access doors
Material that is tightly woven, but not coated. Material is capable
that are capable of being repeatedly resealed. Air locks are
of retaining airborne particles but because it is not coated, does
used in addition, in order to minimize air exchanges and air
not meet the definition of Air-impenetrable. Tightness of the
losses through the entryways.
weave may be compromised with extended use.
5.3.5.2 Type E2 - Entryway Through Resealable Doors:
5.3.2.3 Type B2b - Air-penetrable–Open Mesh: Material
The use of doorways that are capable of being repeatedly
that is formed or woven to allow airflow but that can retain
resealed. Entryways should not be sealed with “C”-clamps that
some airborne particles. NOTE: The design wind loads of
can only be accessed from one direction.
air penetrable materials such as screens are the same as
air-impenetrable materials such as tarps. Openings in materials
5.3.5.3 Type E3 - Entryway Through Overlapping Door
reduce recovery efficiencies
Tarps: The use of multiple flap overlapping door tarps to
minimize dust escape through the entryway.
5.3.2.4 Type B3a - Water-impermeable: Material that
prevents the passage of water.
5.3.5.4 Type E4 - Entryway Through Open Seams:
Special doors are not employed. Entry into the work area is
5.3.2.5 Type B3b - Water-permeable: Open mesh
made through unsealed seams in the containment materials.
material that is formed or woven with openings less than 25 mils
(100 micrometers) in greatest dimension. Material is capable
5.4 VENTILATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS: Items to
of collecting debris, while allowing water to pass though.
be considered when assessing the requirements of ventilation

7
SSPC-Guide 6
May 4, 2015
Editorial Revision April 13, 2018
systems are addressed below. Tables A, W, P, and C provide 5.4.3.2 Type H2 - Visual Verification: Negative pressure
guidance on combining the containment and ventilation must be employed as verified through the concave nature of
requirements. Note that when designing a ventilation system, the wall, ceiling, or floor materials while taking into account
it is necessary to balance the static pressure with the input wind effects. Smoke or other visible means inside or outside
airflow to avoid collapsing ductwork or the containment due to the containment can be used to observe air flow patterns.
high negative pressures.
NOTE: Selecting a ventilation system based on 5.4.3.3 Type H3 - Not Required: Specified degree of
information in this guide may assist in the control of emissions negative pressure not required.
released through the atmosphere and improve visibility inside
containment, but does not assure worker safety from exposure 5.4.4 Air Movement Inside Containment: Air movement
to respirable particulate matter or toxic metals. Representative is utilized inside containment for several reasons:
air sampling in the worker’s breathing zone for air contaminants • to reduce the exposure of workers to airborne dust
should always be conducted when employees may be exposed (e.g., in 29 CFR 1926.62, OSHA stipulates that
in excess of the specified OSHA limits, and depending upon the engineering controls must be instituted to the extent
results, changes to the ventilation system may be necessary. feasible to control worker exposure to lead dust)
Air sample collection and analysis methods must conform to • to improve visibility
OSHA standards and NIOSH methods. NOTE: The ventilation system must be designed
to ensure air movement past the workers in
5.4.1 Air Supply (Intake) Points order to control worker exposures and improve
visibility,
5.4.1.1 Type F1 - Controlled Air Supply (Intake): The • to remove dust-laden air
use of baffles, louvers, flap seals, filters, and ducts on supply • to aid in preventing contaminants from escaping
air points to preclude inadvertent escape of abrasive and into the environment (e.g., in 40 CFR 260-268 EPA
debris. They may or may not be used in combination with stipulates that no hazardous debris is permitted to be
fans (see Section 5.4.2.1). The optimum direction for airflow deposited on the ground, but no specific criteria have
should be evaluated when selecting air intake points relative to been established to achieve these goals)
exhaust (e.g., along bridge stringers rather than across them).
5.4.4.1 Type I1 - Minimum Air Movement is Specified:
5.4.1.2 Type F2 - Open Air Supply (Intake): Open-air Achieving air movement through the containment requires
entry points without the use of ducts, valves, or baffles. the use of mechanical ventilation (see Notes 7.1 and 7.2).
Air movement may be specified by establishing a minimum
5.4.2 Input Air Flow velocity of air at 100 feet per minute (fpm) in crossdraft or
60 fpm in down draft (see Notes 7.3, 7.4 and 7.5).
5.4.2.1 Type G1 - Forced Input Air Flow: Fans or
The selection of methods and criteria for specifying or
blowers are used at the supply air points or other locations
producing air movement should be based on an analysis of
within containment to assist airflow through the containment
project-specific conditions, including the blasting pressure,
structure. When used with a negative pressure system, the
number and size of blast nozzles, type, size and friability of
input airflow must be properly balanced with the exhaust
abrasive, flow rate of abrasive, the lead or toxic metal content,
capacity throughout the range of operations.
thickness and age of the paint being removed, the type and
size of structure being prepared, and the configuration of the
5.4.2.2 Type G2 - Natural Input Air Flow: Fans or blowers
containment system being installed.
are not used at supply air entry points.
While there are generally accepted criteria for specifying
air movement, air velocity past the worker is often a primary
5.4.3 Air Pressure Inside Containment: The air pressure
consideration when designing ventilation systems, because of
maintained inside containment has the following effect on
worker protection issues.
control of emissions:
• Negative pressure creates an inward flow of air
5.4.4.2 Type I2 - Minimum Air Movement is Not
through openings or breaches, helping to control the
Specified: Under this approach, the specifier does not establish
escape of dust
any criteria for minimum air movement in containment. Note
• Positive pressure creates an outward flow of air
that when removing lead-containing paints, it may still be
through openings or breaches, proving no control
necessary to utilize feasible engineering controls to reduce
over escaping dust
airborne lead exposure in accordance with the provisions of
29 CFR 1926.62 and to prevent the escape of airborne lead
5.4.3.1 Type H1 - Instrument Verification: An average
particulates from the containment.
negative pressure throughout the enclosure of at least 0.03
inches (0.08 cm) water column (W.C.) relative to ambient 5.4.5 Exhaust Air Flow/Dust Collection
conditions should be maintained during the surface preparation
and clean-up operations. Manometers or magnehelic gages 5.4.5.1 Type J1 - Air Filtration Required: Forced exhaust
can be used to verify negative pressure. air flow into dust collectors (wet or dry) or baghouses sized

8
SSPC-Guide 6
May 4, 2015
Editorial Revision April 13, 2018
appropriately for the type and size of particulate matter and for 7. NOTES
the volume and velocity of air moved through the containment.
SSPC Guide 16 provides information on the selection of dust 7.1 In the preamble to 29 CFR 1926.62, OSHA states (pg
collectors. 26614) that it believes an exposure reduction factor of 50% will
be achievable for mechanical ventilation systems. If feasible
5.4.5.2 Type J2 - Air Filtration Not Required: Natural engineering controls do not reduce the exposure below
exhaust airflow is employed without the use of forced air the PEL, administrative controls, good work practices, and
or dust filtration. Little control over the debris being emitted effective use of respiratory protective equipment are needed in
into the environment is possible when using dust-producing addition to feasible engineering controls to help control worker
methods of preparation such as abrasive blasting. exposures to lead and other toxic metals.

5.5 METHODS FOR ASSESSING QUANTITY OF 7.2 The OSHA Standard on Lead in Construction (29
EMISSIONS: Surface preparation and paint removal CFR 1926.62) does not specify air velocities moving through
operations produce dust and debris that may be emitted containment, but it states that engineering and work practice
into the environment. Methods for quantifying the amount controls must be utilized as necessary to reduce airborne
of dust and debris escaping the work area are described in exposures.
SSPC-TU 7. Methods A and G provide immediate feedback
on the emissions created. Methods B, C, and D require days 7.3 The construction industry ventilation standard (29 CFR
to receive results. Methods E and F provide results upon 1926.57) refers to ANSI Z9.2-1960 with regard to abrasive
project completion. Users should contact the appropriate blast cleaning. ANSI Z9.2-1960 was revised in 1979 and 2001.
state and local authorities to ascertain which of the methods ANSI Z9.2-1979 in Table A2 suggests a downdraft velocity
are accepted for monitoring emissions, and to establish the in abrasive blasting rooms of 60 to 100 feet per minute. The
appropriate acceptance criteria. 2001 version has removed the technical design data from
the standard and instead refers to other resources for this
5.5.1 Method A–Visible Emissions: See SSPC-TU 7, information (described below).
Section 6 ANSI Z9.4-1985 (revised in 1997) addresses ventilation
in abrasive blasting rooms. Both the 1985 and 1997 versions
5.5.2 Method B–Ambient Air Monitoring for PM-10:
suggest provision of a downdraft ranging from 60 to 90 feet
See SSPC-TU 7, Section 7
per minute (the larger the floor area, the lower the air flow
recommendation), or a cross draft of 100 feet per minute when
5.5.3 Method C–Occupational Monitoring of Area
removing coatings containing toxic metals by dry abrasive
Emissions for Lead: See SSPC-TU 7, Section 8
blasting.
5.5.4 Method D–EPA Ambient Air Monitoring for Toxic Both ANSI Z9.2-2001 and ANSI Z9.4-1997 refer to
Metals: See SSPC-TU 7, Section 9 “Industrial Ventilation, A Manual of Recommended Practice”
published by the American Conference of Governmental Indus-
5.5.5 Method E–Soil Analysis for Toxic Metals: See trial Hygienists (ACGIH) as the definitive resource in the area
SSPC-TU 7, Section 10 of industrial ventilation. Figure VS-80-01, Abrasive Blasting
Room, of “Industrial Ventilation” suggests a down draft velocity
5.5.6 Method F–Water and Sediment Analysis for of 50 to 100 feet per minute (with a typical choice of 80 feet per
Toxic Metals: See SSPC-TU 7, Section 11 minute) and a cross draft velocity of 100 feet per minute. These
recommendations are for operator visibility and to control the
6. DISCLAIMER escape of contaminants into adjacent work areas.
SSPC recognizes that fixed abrasive blast rooms are
6.1 While every precaution is taken to ensure that all not the same as field containment structures, and is making
information furnished in SSPC guides is as accurate, complete, no representations regarding the suitability of the velocities
and useful as possible, SSPC cannot assume responsibility (whether too much or too little). For example, Federal
nor incur any obligation resulting from the use of any materials, Highway Administration research involving air movement
coatings, or methods described herein, or of the guide itself. inside containment when removing lead paint by abrasive
blast cleaning Research Report Number RD-94-1005 found no
6.2 This guide does not attempt to address problems significant differences in worker lead exposures at cross-draft
concerning safety associated with its use. The user of this velocities of 70 to 300 feet per minute. (The abrasives involved
specification, as well as the user of all products or practices in the study were steel grit and mineral sand.) The blast room
described herein, is responsible for instituting appropriate information is presented in these Notes due to the link to ANSI
health and safety practices and for ensuring compliance with Z9.2 that is provided through 29 CFR 1926.57, and because it
all governmental regulations. may provide information that could be beneficial to some users
of the guide.

5
Lead-Containing Paint Removal, Containment, and Disposal, (McLean, VA: U.S. Dept. of
Transportation, Federal Highway Administration) Publication No. FHWA-RD-94-100 (out of
print).

9
SSPC-Guide 6
May 4, 2015
Editorial Revision April 13, 2018
7.4 ANSI Z9.2-1979 and 2001 indicate that large solid 7.5 ANSI Z9.2-1979 states in paragraph 4.8.1(1) that
particles usually cannot be captured by conventional air if data on control velocity and volume are not available in
flow patterns, but that air flow patterns should ensure that reliable published information, control velocity and volume can
hygienically significant particle sizes are captured. Hygienically be determined by measurement of actual airflow velocities
significant particle sizes are defined as particles that are less for projects on which control has been attained. ANSI Z9.2-
than 10 micrometers in size. It suggests that the larger particle 2001 simply refers to “Industrial Ventilation” and appropriate
sizes should be allowed to fall to the floor to be removed ANSI, OSHA, and NIOSH publications for recommended
by housekeeping practices. As a result, when designing airflow rates. Little information has been published regarding
ventilation systems for containment, primary consideration control velocities in field containments. As a result, the
should be given to the movement of the hygienically significant specifier may consider allowing the contractor to demonstrate
particle sizes through the enclosure to the exhaust hood in that the proposed air velocity inside containment will provide
combination with good housekeeping practices to remove the the necessary and desired controls (i.e., reduced worker
heavier particles. exposures, controlled blood lead levels, controlled emissions,
etc.) to comply with the OSHA mandate for engineering
controls.

Editorial Revisions since May 4, 2015:


Tables A,W, C and P have been updated to reflect the relevant sections of the text of the Guide. Several typographical errors have
been corrected in the text, but no revisions were made to the 2012 language.

COPYRIGHT ©
SSPC standards, guides, and technical reports are copyrighted
world-wide by SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings. Any
photocopying, re-selling, or redistribution of these standards,
guides, and technical reports by printed, electronic, or any
other means is strictly prohibited without the express written
consent of SSPC: The Society of Protective Coatings and a
formal licensing agreement.

10
Table A – Abrasive Blast Cleaning*
Combinations of Containment and Ventilation System Components

Containment System Ventilation (5.4 of SSPC-Guide 6)


Containment 5.4.5
5.3.1 5.3.3 5.4.4
Classification 5.3.2 5.3.4 5.4.1 Air 5.4.2 5.4.3 Exhaust
Containment Support 5.3.5 Entryway Air
Penetrability Joints Make-Up Input Airflow Air Pressure Dust
Materials Structure Movement
Filtration
H1-
Instrument
A1- Rigid C1- Rigid E1 - Airlock G1- Forced
B1- Air Verification I1- Minimum J1-
Class 1A D1- Full Seal F1- Controlled
Impenetrable Specified Filtration
A2 - Flexible C2 - Flexible E2 -Resealable G2 -Natural
H2 - Visual
Verification

A1- Rigid C1- Rigid E2 -Resealable F1- Controlled G1 -Forced


B1- Air H2 - Visual I1- Minimum J1-
Class 2A D1- Full Seal
Impenetrable Verification Specified Filtration
A2 - Flexible C2 - Flexible E3 - Overlap F2 - Open G2 - Natural

D1- Full Seal


A1- Rigid B2a - Air C1- Rigid E-3 Overlap F1- Controlled G1- Forced
H3 - Not I2 - Not J1-
Class 3A Penetrable
D2 - Partial Required Specified Filtration

11
A2 - Flexible (Tightly Woven) C2 - Flexible E4 - Open Seam F2 - Open G2 - Natural
Seal

J2 - No
B2a or B2b - D2 - Partial H3 - Not I2 - Not
Class 4A A2 - Flexible C3 - Minimal E4 - Open Seam F2 - Open G2 -Natural Controls on
Air Penetrable Seal Required Specified
Exhaust

Note 1: The information in this table is provided for guidance only and does not guarantee that any specific levels of containment will be achieved by following the
suggestions. The type of structure, wind conditions, soundness of the materials of construction, and many other factors play a role in containing dust and
debris.
Note 2: The table occasionally identifies two options for a given component. For example, containment materials (5.3.1) are shown as being either rigid or flexible. If
the specifier requires the use of rigid materials only, this restriction must be specified separately.
Note 3: The design suggestions made in this table are based on the use of open abrasive blast cleaning inside containment with expendable abrasives. The
classifications are ordered from the greatest degree of dust and debris containment (Class 1A) to the least (Class 4A). Normally the higher the degree of
containment, the higher the costs.
Note 4: Many other combinations of the components beyond those suggested above can be used to provide similar results. The method of preparation can also be
adjusted to reduce or eliminate dust emissions.
Note 5: Certain combinations of components within each class may not be suitable when removing hazardous paints (e.g., forced air input in combination with open
seams in Class 3A)
Note 6: When designing a ventilation system, care must be taken to balance the static pressure with the input airflow to avoid collapsing the containment due to high
negative pressure.
* When vacuum shrouded blast cleaning is employed, ground covers and/or free hanging tarpaulins may provide controls equivalent to Class 1A.
SSPC-Guide 6

Editorial Revision April 13, 2018


May 4, 2015
May 4, 2015

TABLE W – WATER BLASTING/WATERJETTING*


SSPC-Guide 6

COMBINATIONS OF CONTAINMENT AND VENTILATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS

Containment System Ventilation (5.4 of SSPC-Guide 6)

Containment 5.4.5
5.3.1 5.3.3 5.4.4
Classification 5.3.2 5.3.4 5.4.1 Air 5.4.2 5.4.3 - Air Exhaust
Editorial Revision April 13, 2018

Containment Support 5.3.5 Entryway Air


Penetrability Joints Make-Up Input Airflow Pressure Dust
Materials Structure Movement
Filtration
B1- Air
A1- Rigid Impenetrable C1- Rigid G1 - Forced
H2 - Visual I1- Minimum J1-
Class 1W AND D1- Full Seal E2 - F2 - Open
Verification Specified Filtration
A2 Flexible B3a - Water C2 - Flexible Resealable G2 - Natural
Impermeable

A1- Rigid C1- Rigid


B3a - Water H3 - Not I2 - Not J2 - Not
Class 2W D1- Full Seal E3 - Overlap G2 - Natural
Impermeable F2 - Open Required Specified Required
A2 Flexible C2 - Flexible

12
A1- Rigid
B3a - Water D2 - Partial E4-Open H3 - Not I2 - Not J2 - Not
C3 - Minimal F2 - Open G2 - Natural
Impermeable Seal Seam Required Specified Required
Class 3W A-2 Flexible

A1 - Rigid
B3b - Water D2 - Partial E4 - Open H3 - Not I2 – Not J2 – Not
Class 4W C2 - Flexible F2 – Open G2 - Natural
Permeable Seal Seam Required Specified Required
A2 - Flexible

Note 1: When designing a ventilation system, care must be taken to balance the static pressure with the input airflow to avoid collapsing the containment or
ductwork due to high negative pressure.
Note 2: The table occasionally identifies two options for a given component. For example, containment materials (5.3.1) are shown as being either rigid or
flexible. If the specifier requires the use of rigid materials only, this restriction must be specified separately.
Note 3: Class 4W will capture dislodged paint chips and debris, but will not contain the water used for cleaning.
* When vacuum shrouded waterjetting is employed, ground covers or free-hanging tarpaulins may provide controls equivalent to Class 1W.
TABLE C – CHEMICAL STRIPPING
COMBINATIONS OF CONTAINMENT AND VENTILATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS

Containment System Ventilation (5.4 of SSPC-Guide 6)

Containment 5.4.5
Classification 5.3.1 5.3.3 5.4.4
5.3.2 5.3.4 5.3.5 5.4.1 Air 5.4.2 5.4.3 - Air Exhaust
Containment Support Air
Penetrability Joints Entryway Make-Up Input Airflow Pressure Dust
Materials Structure Movement
Filtration
B1- Air
Impenetrable
AND
A1- Rigid C1- Rigid G1 - Forced
B3a - Water D1- Full F2 - H3 - Not I2 - Not J1-
Class 1C E3 -Overlap
Impermeable Seal Open Required Specified Filtration
A2 Flexible C2-Flexible G2 - Natural
AND
B4-Chemical

13
Resistant
B3a - Water
A1- Rigid Impermeable C1- Rigid
D1- Full H3 - Not I2 - Not J2 - Not
Class 2C AND E3 -Overlap F2 - G2 - Natural
Seal Required Specified Required
A2 Flexible B4-Chemical C2-Flexible Open
Resistant

B3a - Water
A1- Rigid Impermeable D2 -
C3 - E4 - Open F2 - H3 - Not I2 - Not J2 - Not
Class 3C AND Partial G2 - Natural
Minimal Seam Open Required Specified Required
A-2 Flexible B4-Chemical Seal
Resistant

Note 1: When designing a ventilation system, care must be taken to balance the static pressure with the input airflow to avoid
collapsing the containment or ductwork due to high negative pressure.
Note 2: The table occasionally identifies two options for a given component. For example, containment materials (5.3.1) are shown as
being either rigid or flexible. If the specifier requires the use of rigid materials only, this restriction must be specified separately.
Note 3: When pressure washing is used to remove the dislodged paint, it may be necessary to specify one of the containments from
Table W for the control of the water and waste.
SSPC-Guide 6

Editorial Revision April 13, 2018


May 4, 2015
May 4, 2015

TABLE P – POWER TOOL CLEANING*


SSPC-Guide 6

COMBINATIONS OF CONTAINMENT AND VENTILATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS

Containment System Ventilation (5.4 of SSPC-Guide 6)


Containment 5.4.5
Editorial Revision April 13, 2018

Classification 5.3.1 5.3.3 5.4.4


5.3.2 5.3.4 5.3.5 5.4.1 Air 5.4.2 5.4.3 - Air Exhaust
Containment Support Air
Penetrability Joints Entryway Make-Up Input Airflow Pressure Dust
Materials Structure Movement
Filtration

C1- Rigid
A1- Rigid G1 - Forced I1-
B1- Air D1- Full F1 H2 -Visual
Class 1P E2 - Minimum J1- Filtration
Impenetrable C2 - Seal Controlled Verification
A2 - Flexible Resealable G2 - Natural Specified
Flexible

B1- Air
C1- Rigid
A1- Rigid Impenetrable E3 - Overlap
D1- Full H3 - Not I2 - Not J2 - Not
Class 2P G2 - Natural
C2 - Seal F2 - Open Required Specified Required
A2 - Flexible B2a or B2b - E4 - Open

14
Flexible
Air Penetrable Seam

A1- Rigid D2 -
B2a or B2b - C3 - E4 - Open H3 - Not I2 - Not J2 - Not
Class 3P Partial F2 - Open G2 - Natural
Air Penetrable Minimal Seam Required Specified Required
A2 - Flexible Seal

Note 1: When designing a ventilation system, care must be taken to balance the static pressure with the input air flow to avoid collapsing the containment or
ductwork due to high negative pressure.
Note 2: The table occasionally identifies two options for a given component. For example, containment materials (5.3.1) are shown as being either rigid or
flexible. If the specifier requires the use of rigid materials only, this restriction must be specified separately.
* For hand tool cleaning or vacuum shrouded power tool cleaning, ground covers or free-hanging tarpaulins may provide controls equivalent to Class 1P.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The guide's table classifies containment materials as either rigid or flexible, which affects their application in different scenarios of paint removal. Rigidity or flexibility is chosen based on the specific needs for containment integrity and environmental conditions. If the specifications demand rigid materials, this must be separately noted, as materials influence the containment's durability and effectiveness in dust and debris retention .

The primary objectives of containment systems in paint removal operations are to minimize or prevent emissions from escaping the work area and assess the adequacy of these controls. The systems are categorized into containment classes based on the extent to which emissions are controlled, with Class 1 offering the greatest emission control for methods that produce large quantities of dust and debris, and Class 4 providing the least control for methods producing lesser quantities .

The guide describes several methods for assessing emissions: Method A addresses visible emissions; Method B involves ambient air monitoring for PM-10; Method C covers occupational monitoring for lead area emissions; Method D provides EPA ambient air monitoring for toxic metals; Method E involves soil analysis for toxic metals; and Method F deals with water and sediment analysis for toxic metals. Different methods offer various timelines for feedback, such as immediate, days later, or upon project completion .

The guide suggests that debris escaping the containment during paint removal should be removed regularly, for example, at the end of the workday or as specified. This prevents debris from being carried away by winds or rain, which can cause environmental contamination by reaching surrounding properties, soil, or bodies of water .

The guide recommends using natural exhaust airflow when forced air or dust filtration is not required, especially in situations where minimal control is necessary. However, for more effective emission control, forced ventilation with specific air pressure and airflow considerations should be employed. This allows better control and management of dust emissions during operations .

When specifying the class of containment for a paint removal project, factors such as the method of surface preparation, the quantity of dust and debris generated, environmental conditions, and the specific regulatory requirements for emission control must be considered. The containment design must be effective in controlling emissions of dust and debris, considering factors like spills, leaks, and environmental influence like wind .

The guide acknowledges the necessity of complying with federal, state, and local regulations concerning the control of airborne particulates and emissions during paint removal operations. Regulatory compliance is critical to ensure that paint removal projects do not cause environmental contamination with toxic metals, and specific emission assessment methods may need to be employed to meet these standards .

The guide notes that ventilation systems alone may not be sufficient to protect workers from exposure to toxic metals, such as lead, during paint removal operations. Additional work practices, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment may be necessary. Ventilation systems can help control emissions but are not a comprehensive solution for worker safety .

When designing a ventilation system, it is crucial to balance the static pressure of the containment with input airflow to prevent collapse caused by high negative pressure. The guide advises adjusting the method of preparation to reduce emissions and ensuring compatibility with the structural needs of the containment system to maintain its integrity .

The guide emphasizes immediate and routine debris collection to prevent accumulation that could lead to environmental contamination. By regularly collecting debris, such as at the end of a workday, operators can prevent it from being dispersed by weather or reaching uncontrolled areas, thereby reducing environmental risks and ensuring regulatory compliance .

You might also like