Integrated Participatory Development and Management of Irrigation Program (RRP INO 43220)

Program Implementation Document

Project Number: 43220

Loan Number: LXXXX
March 2017

Republic of Indonesia: Integrated Participatory

Development and Management of Irrigation Program
CONTENTS
Abbreviations

I. Program Description 1

A. Strategic Context 1
B. Program Rationale 1
C. Program Scope 2

II. Results and Disbursement 3

A. The RBL Program’s Overall Results 3

B. Disbursement-Linked Indicators 5
C. Disbursement-Linked Indicator Verification Protocols 6
D. Disbursement Allocation and Status 7

III. Expenditure Framework and Financing 8

A. Expenditure Framework 8
B. Program Financing 8

IV. Program Systems and Implementation Arrangements 9

A. Monitoring and Evaluation System 9

B. Fiduciary Systems 10
C. Satisfying Procurement Member Country Eligibility Restrictions 14
D. Safeguard Systems 14
E. Gender and Social Dimensions 18
F. Communication and Information Disclosure Arrangements 19
G. Development Coordination 19

V. Integrated Risks and Mitigating Measures 19

A. Key Risks and Mitigating Measures 19

VI. Program Action Plan 23

A. Status of Program Action Plan 23

VII. Monitoring of Key program covenants 39

VIII. Summary of Key Outstanding issues 39

IX. Accountability Mechanism 39

X. Changes in Program Scope and Implementation Arrangements 39

XI. Program Organizational Structure and Focal Staff 40

A. Organizational Structure 40
B. Program Officers and Focal Persons 41
PURPOSE OF THE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION DOCUMENT

The developing member country (DMC) is wholly responsible for implementing the program
supported by results-based lending (RBL). The Asian Development Bank (ADB) staff support the
results-based lending program design and implementation.

The program administration document (PID) consolidates the essential program implementation
information. The PID is a management tool which supports effective program implementation,
monitoring, and reporting. It is developed throughout the program processing, and should be
discussed with the DMC at Loan Negotiations. It is a living document that should be refined and
kept up to date during program implementation.
Abbreviations

ADB = Asian Development Bank

DGWR = Directorate General of Water Resources
DILL = Directorate of Irrigation and Low Land
DLI = disbursement-linked indicator
DMC = developing member country
DOM = Directorate of Operations and Maintenance
GRM = grievance redress mechanism
IAMP = irrigated agriculture management plans
IFAD = International Fund for Agricultural Development
IIP = Irrigation Improvement Program
M&E = monitoring and evaluation
MOA = Ministry of Agriculture
MOHA = Ministry of Home Affairs
MPWH = Ministry of Public Works and Housing
O&M = operation and maintenance
PID = program implementation document
PAP = program action plan
RBL = results-based lending
RBO = river basin organization
RRP = report and recommendation of the president
SETIP = Social, Economic, Technical and Institutional Profile
SPS = Safeguard Policy Statement
WRA = water resources agency
WUA = water user association
I. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

A. Strategic Context

1. Boosting rural incomes and improving food security are significant concerns in
Indonesia. Poverty is still predominantly rural, with rates in rural areas 1.8 times higher than
urban poverty rates.1 Millions of people derive their incomes from food production, and food is
the single largest expenditure item for the vast majority of households.2 Despite positive trends
in agricultural production, Indonesia still faces rising food imports, higher domestic food prices,
and sporadic food shortages. With most of the grain crops coming from irrigated areas, water
resources and irrigation management play an important role in the country’s efforts to increase
agricultural output. However, water availability to the farm community is erratic in many areas.
The Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MPWH) estimates that only 55% of the nation’s
irrigation system is functioning at full capacity, limiting yields and reducing cropping intensity.3
Irrigated agriculture is also sensitive to many of the anticipated impacts of climate change.

2. Since 2006, the Directorate General of Water Resources (DGWR), MPWH introduced
reforms to improve water delivery and operation and maintenance (O&M) services by applying
participatory irrigation management. In 2010, the DGWR established a directorate dedicated to
O&M for water resources. Asset management and needs-based budgeting (NBB) processes
have been introduced to address the long-term sustainability of the infrastructure. In 2015, the
DGWR institutionalized reforms introduced under the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-financed
Participatory Irrigation Sector Project to improve sector performance.4 This provides a robust
regulatory framework for irrigation infrastructure, management, and O&M.

3. However, effective implementation is lacking. The budget for maintenance is inadequate,

resulting in under-functioning infrastructure and lost production. Institutions and processes need
strengthening, especially at the subnational level, to ensure sufficient budget allocation for
routine O&M. To this end, a sound irrigation asset management registry and better planning at
the scheme level are required, as a basis for NBB and performance benchmarking. Water
delivery services also need improvements to provide the intended level of service and to cope
with climate variability. Irrigation schemes need to be rehabilitated or upgraded to overcome
design shortcomings, and improve water efficiency and climate resilience. Improving irrigation
services is necessary to increase rice yields and cropping intensity, provide farmers with an
incentive to diversify from low- to high-value crops, increase rural incomes, and enhance food
security. Better integration between irrigation and agriculture is needed to adapt to climate risks,
and to ensure that farmers’ incomes rise as agricultural productivity increases.

B. Program Rationale

4. The program is aligned to the government’s long-term National Development Plan,

2005–20255 and National Medium-Term Development Plan, 2015–20196, in which water and
1
In 2016, 17.28 million people (14.0%) of people in rural areas fell below the rural poverty line of Rp350,420 per
capita per month. Central Bureau of Statistics. 2016 Profile of Poverty in Indonesia.
[Link]
(accessed 7 April 2017).
2 In 2015, agriculture contributed 14.0% of the gross domestic product, with an estimated 39 million people working
in the sector. (ADB. 2016. Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2016. Manila.)
3 MPWH. 2014. Irrigation Systems Rapid Assessment. Jakarta.
4 ADB. 2003. Report and Recommendation of the President to the Board of Directors: Proposed Loans to the
Republic of Indonesia for the Participatory Irrigation Sector Project. Manila.
5 Government of Indonesia. 2005. Long-term Development Plan: RPJPN 2005-2025. Jakarta.
2

food security are priorities. To meet these national goals, the Irrigation Investment Program (IIP)
calls for participatory irrigation management, better asset management systems, NBB,
strengthening of water users associations (WUAs) and water resources agencies (WRAs), and
the rehabilitation of 3.2 million hectares (ha) of irrigation systems. The program is also aligned
with the priorities of ADB’s 2016–2019 country partnership strategy, for Indonesia, which aims
to improve the delivery of rural and water infrastructure investment.7 The program is included in
ADB’s country operations business plan, 2017–2019 for Indonesia. It is aligned with ADB’s
Water Operational Plan, 2011–2020 and Operational Plan for Agriculture and Natural
Resources, 2015–2020.8,9

5. This operation will be delivered using the results-based lending (RBL) modality because
of (i) the strong government ownership of and commitment for the IIP; (ii) the nature of the
program which requires a results and system approach; (iii) the opportunity to leverage ADB
financing by influencing key results under a large program; and (iv) the potential for
harmonization among development partners through a mutual focus on results. RBL is also a
suitable modality because it can (i) provide the most effective form of support compared with
other modalities by leveraging institutional changes within the government-led program; (ii)
enhance operational efficiency by shifting the focus to results rather than transactions which
would otherwise be scattered across a large program area; (iii) make use of and strengthen
country systems on the basis of the outcome of technical, fiduciary, and safeguard-system
assessments; (iv) develop institutional capacity through effective use of disbursement-linked
indicators (DLIs); and (v) enable ADB to disburse for results related to institutional
strengthening, and capacity development to improve O&M and management.

6. The program design draws on ADB’s knowledge base and experience, and incorporates
the key recommendations on sustainability for irrigation from the Participatory Irrigation Sector
Project.10 The program will add value by (i) strengthening institutional frameworks and improving
implementation processes; (ii) facilitating convergence between irrigation, livelihood, and
agriculture interventions; (iii) incorporating irrigated development and management plans into
development plans; and (iv) enhancing the roles of communities and women in governance and
service delivery. The program will also introduce innovations: (i) upgrading the irrigation asset
management information system (IAMIS) to a web-based and geospatial interface to facilitate
data management; (ii) introducing aerial surveys to reduce costs and improve the quality of the
asset registry; (iii) preparing water accounting using satellite data to predict water availability
and adjust engineering design; (iv) pilot testing water productivity measurement as a future
vehicle for policy making and improving water security; and (v) improving standards for
engineering design to integrate infrastructure, agriculture, and climate resilience.

C. Program Scope

7. The RBL program will support the strengthening of capacity to address institutional
weaknesses, organizational fragmentation, and weak governance to strengthen O&M and
management of irrigation systems. It will also improve water delivery to farmers by providing
financing to help the government rehabilitate or upgrade irrigation systems. This combination of

6 Government of Indonesia. 2015. Medium-term Development Plan: RPJMN 2015-2019. Jakarta.

7 ADB. 2016. Country Partnership Strategy, 2016–2019: Towards a Higher, More Inclusive and Sustainable
Growth Path. 2016. Manila.
8 ADB. 2011. Water Operational Plan, 2011–2020. Manila.
9 ADB. 2015. Operational Plan for Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2015–2020. Manila.
10 ADB. 2014. Completion Report: Participatory Irrigation Sector Project in Indonesia. Manila; and ADB. 2016.

Performance Evaluation Report: Participatory Irrigation Sector Project in Indonesia. Manila.

3

measures will improve rural resilience and, ultimately, boost water resource productivity.
International Fund for Agricultural Development’s (IFAD) support will complement ADB
assistance by addressing underperforming extension services, poor access to financial
services, and inefficiencies in the value-chain and cropping patterns that contribute to low farm
incomes. The program scope is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Program Scope
Item Broader Government Program Results-Based Lending Program
Outcome Sustainable and more productive Sustainable and more productive irrigated
irrigated agriculture in Indonesia agriculture in 74 districts
Key outputs Rehabilitated or upgraded irrigation Same elements as the broader government
infrastructure; appropriate operation program, organized into three outputs: (i) systems
and maintenance; improved farmers’ and institutional capacity for sustainable irrigated
participation; and strengthened agriculture strengthened; (ii) irrigation operation,
institutions. maintenance, and management improved; and (iii)
irrigation infrastructure improved.
Activity types Rehabilitation or upgrading of Upgrading of engineering guidelines;
irrigation infrastructure; improved operationalization of irrigation commissions;
asset management and needs-based improved asset management and needs-based
budgeting; establishment of water budgeting through use of information system;
users associations; and institutional operationalization of water users associations;
strengthening of water resources institutional strengthening of water resources
agencies and irrigation commissions. agencies; water accounting; and rehabilitation or
upgrading of irrigation infrastructure.
Program expenditure $9.94 billion $1,679 million
Main financiers and the Government of Indonesia: $7.24 $1,051 million: Government of Indonesia (62.60%)
respective financing billion $600 million: ADB (35.73%)a
amounts Development institutions: $2.70 billion $28 million: World Bank (1.67%)b
Geographic coverage National 74 districtsc
Implementation period 2015–2025 2017–2021
ADB = Asian Development Bank, ASEAN = Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
a Including $100 million from the ASEAN Infrastructure Fund.
b Parallel financing provided under the ongoing Water Resources and Irrigation Sector Management Program

(Phase II).
c The program is proposed to cover 74 districts across 16 provinces (Banten, Central Java, Central Sulawesi, East

Java, East Nusa Tenggara, Lampung, Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam, North Sulawesi, North Sumatra, West Nusa
Tenggara, South Kalimantan, South Sulawesi, South Sumatra, West Java, West Kalimantan, and West Sumatra).
Source: Asian Development Bank estimates.

II. RESULTS AND DISBURSEMENT

A. The RBL Program’s Overall Results

8. The RBL program’s impacts will be improved rural incomes and livelihoods, and
enhanced food security. The outcome will be sustainable and more productive irrigated
agriculture in 74 districts, as evidenced by the enhanced performance of irrigation systems (DLI
1).11 An additional indicator on increased crop yield will reflect the convergence with agricultural
interventions by the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) and IFAD.12 The program will emphasize
strengthening of institutions and systems, including better tracking of irrigation system
performance. Increased farmer participation will help improve water delivery. Improved asset

11 The government’s irrigation performance index measures improvements in infrastructure, water efficiency, cropping
intensity, WUA participation, and other supporting factors required for sustainable and more productive agriculture.
12
Cropping intensity is the number of times a crop is planted per year in a given agricultural area, while crop yield for
rice refers to the weight of rice, at some agreed standard moisture content, per unit of land area harvested for rice.
Crop yield will depend more on MOA interventions than on the program, so it has not been made a DLI.
4

management, NBB, and planning will improve O&M to ensure sustainability of the irrigation
infrastructure. The outcome will be achieved through three outputs.

9. Output 1: Systems and institutional capacity for sustainable irrigated agriculture

strengthened. Output 1 will support institutional measures that strengthen the planning,
management, and delivery of irrigation systems; and improve linkage between irrigation service
delivery and agricultural development support. It will support the upgrading of (i) engineering
guidelines for irrigation infrastructure to improve water efficiency and climate resilience, and (ii)
planning guidelines to ensure that irrigation and agriculture development are integrated (DLI
2).DLI 3 measures the operationalization of irrigation commissions, which will improve
subnational institutional capacities for integrating agriculture and infrastructure development and
O&[Link] on these strengthened institutions, this output will support the process to
incorporate irrigation development and management plans into regional plans as captured by
DLI 4.13 A capacity development framework will be implemented and monitored (program action
plan [PAP])14 to strengthen the capacity of river basin organizations (RBOs), WRAs, and
subnational planning agencies to address weaknesses in implementing government safeguards,
procurement, financial management, gender mainstreaming, engineering, and irrigation O&M
and management processes. Output 1 will also promote climate-resilient practices and provide
training to farmers in water management.

10. Output 2: Irrigation operation, maintenance, and management improved. Output 2

will implement measures aimed at enhancing irrigation sustainability and resilience at the
scheme level. Having a better understanding of the condition of the irrigation network is critical
to this effort. Toward that end, the program will upgrade and update the IAMIS to cover 2.5
million ha of irrigated area using aerial surveys of assets and remote sensing technologies (DLI
5). This will enable better linkages between asset management, sector budgeting, and planning.
The participation of beneficiaries is central in improving asset management and water service
delivery. Output 2 will enhance the role and participation of WUAs, including women and poor
farmers, in the planning, design and construction, and operation of irrigation infrastructure to
improve maintenance and management (DLI 6). Output 2 will also promote climate-resilient
practices and provide training to farmers in water management.15 It will ensure the convergence
of irrigation, livelihood, and agriculture interventions in the technical, socioeconomic, and
institutional profiling of irrigation schemes as a basis for investments (DLI 7).

11. Output 3: Irrigation infrastructure improved. The program will support infrastructure
rehabilitation and/or upgrading. Rehabilitation will address design shortcomings, restore
effective water service delivery, and improve water efficiency and climate resilience (DLI 8). To
ensure the technical soundness of investments, the program will confirm the reliability of water
sources through water accounting. The combination of participatory approaches and technology
will lead to irrigation systems with improved efficiency that better serve the farm community.

12. Convergence. The program will promote convergence between irrigation and
agricultural development across the three outputs. Convergence will be strengthened at three
levels: (i) planning of national programs between the MPWH and the MOA; (ii) program planning
at sub-national level facilitated by the irrigation commissions; and (iii) at scheme level through
planning and budgeting, which will involve coordination and detailed mapping of interventions.

13 The irrigation development and management plan is formally approved with appropriate budget allocations by the
district or province parliament. It then becomes part of the development policy and plan for that district/province.
14
Program Action Plan (accessible from the list of linked documents in Appendix 2).
15 IFAD will also promote climate-resilient practices and provide training to farmers in production, soil and crop

management, improved planting methods, and improved pest and harvest management.
5

The mapping will identify the gaps from a “menu” of required interventions in a given scheme or
district. The aim will be to ensure that the whole range of interventions, including those financed
by others, converges on each district and enables that scheme or district to achieve the desired
outcome. The complementarity with other partners fostered by the RBL approach makes
innovation possible.

1. Program Results Framework

13. The Program Results Framework is shown in Appendix 1.

2. Implementation Status

14. The implementation of the program and achievement will be monitored using the table in
Appendix 2.

3. Issues and Changes

15. Non-applicable.

B. Disbursement-Linked Indicators

1. Description of Disbursement-Linked Indicators

Table 2: Disbursement-Linked Indicators

Disbursement Share of Total
Allocated ADB and AIF
Indicator ($ million) Financing (%)
Outcome: Sustainable and more productive irrigated agriculture in 74
districts
DLI 1: By 2021, performance of irrigation systems in the program area improved 42.0 7.0
by at least 15% from baseline level
Output 1: Systems and institutional capacity for sustainable irrigated
agriculture strengthened
DLI 2: Planning and engineering guidelines for irrigation delivery systems are 36.0 6.0
improved by 2019
DLI 3: Irrigation commissions operationalized to enhance institutional capacity 54.0 9.0
for integration and coordination of agriculture and infrastructure development in
74 districts and 14 provinces by 2021
DLI 4: At least 74 district irrigation development and management plans 18.0 3.0
endorsed by district heads by 2021
Output 2: Irrigation operation, maintenance, and management improved
DLI 5: Irrigation asset management improved for 2.5 million hectares of irrigation 138.0 23.0
systems by 2021
DLI 6: Effective management of tertiary irrigation systems through 24.0 4.0
operationalizing at least 4,500 water users associations by 2021
DLI 7: Improved assessments integrating agriculture and infrastructure 36.0 6.0
development conducted for at least 719 priority schemes by 2021
Output 3: Irrigation infrastructure improved
DLI 8: Rehabilitated irrigation infrastructure in program areas increased by 252.0 42.0
500,000 hectares by 2021
Total 600.0 100.0
ADB = Asian Development Bank, AIF = ASEAN Infrastructure Fund, ASEAN = Association of Southeast Asian
Nations, DLI = disbursement-linked indicator.
Financing under the A loan (ADB) and the B loan (AIF) will be disbursed, subject to the achievement and verification
of the agreed DLIs, on a pro rata basis of 83.3% for the A loan and 16.7% for the B loan.
Source: Asian Development Bank.
6

16. Disbursement-linked indicators (DLIs). The outcome indicator and seven output
indicators, selected based on their significance to achieving the program outcome and impact,
have been further developed and consolidated into the program DLIs (Appendix 3). DLI 1
measures the outcome using the government’s irrigation system performance index (IKSI),
which comprises six criteria: (i) infrastructure functioning; (ii) agriculture productivity (in terms of
cropping intensity and water availability); (iii) supporting facilities for O&M; (iv) adequacy of
human resources for O&M; (v) adequacy of data and information; and (vi) WUAs’ participation.
Equally important, the program will strengthen local government systems required to track the
IKSI performance index. DLIs 2 to 8 measure the outputs and strategies. DLI 2 reflects the
process of institutionalizing program innovations, while DLI 3 measures the process of
enhancing institutional capacity to integrate and coordinate agriculture and infrastructure
development. DLI 4 supports the incorporation of needs-based budgets and plans into district,
province, and national plans and budgets. DLI 5 will ensure a functioning, updated irrigation
asset management system in the program area. DLI 6 recognizes the important role of water
user associations (WUAs) to effectively manage water in a participatory way. DLI 7 measures
the participatory process for preparing investments at the scheme level to enable the
convergence between irrigation, livelihood, and agriculture interventions. DLI 8 focuses on
infrastructure required to improve irrigation system performance.

2. Implementation Status

17. The progress towards the achievement of the DLIs will be monitored using the table in
Appendix 4.

C. Disbursement-Linked Indicator Verification Protocols

1. Description of the Verification Protocols

18. The DLIs represent a sub-set of overall program results, prioritized and sequenced to
contribute to the program’s progress towards outcome. Achievement of the annualized DLI
targets will trigger loan disbursement in pre-agreed amounts. Those that are important for
outcome achievement but difficult to link to disbursement are included in the PAP, together with
other actions for systems improvements. The verification protocols for the DLIs are in Appendix
5.

19. A rigorous verification protocol has been established, including independent, third-party
validation. Each year, the focal unit in the DGWR prepares an attestation that the DLI is met and
attaches the relevant report. The independent verification agency, Financial and Development
Supervisory Board (BPKP), will verify the results twice each year at the DGWR where the
database is housed. The BPKP has a decentralized organizational structure and its mandate is
to verify government financial and development activities. The BPKP has long experience
working for externally funded programs and is the independent verification agent for the World
Bank’s results-based Local Government and Decentralization Project.16 Capitalizing on the
system established under the World Bank funded project, capacity building will be provided as
appropriate to BPKP staff on technical matters in the DLI verification process. In addition, ADB
will conduct review missions to confirm the achievement of DLIs. The BPKP will verify the
results on a sampling basis at the central level, and at district, province, and scheme level. The

16
Through the Local Government and Decentralization Project, the World Bank is supporting improvement of sub-
national governments’ accountability and reporting of the specific allocation funds or Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK)
for the basic infrastructure, consisting of roads, irrigation, water, and sanitation.
7

BPKP will refer to the verification protocols (Appendix 5) and detailed guidelines prepared for
the program. The entire verification process is designed to strengthen national and sub-national
capacities for performance monitoring. In a number of DLIs (DLI1, 3 and 5), setting sub-national
baselines is part of the strengthening process.

20. Verification procedures are summed up as follows:

(i) Partial disbursement is allowed for all eight DLIs, meaning that if the target for
each year is not met, then disbursement can be proportional to the progress
made as set out in the verification protocols.
(ii) Disbursements are allowed for early or late achievement of the DLI. This
means that the planned disbursement amount for a given year can be released
when the set target is fully achieved even if the achievement is a year or more
late, as long as the achievement is during the program’s duration.
(iii) The disbursement amount allocated to each DLI depends on its importance
to achieving the overall outcome. This means that output DLIs deemed most
crucial to achieving the outcome may be allocated higher amounts. While the
cost of achieving the DLI may be a factor for consideration, there is no one-to-
one relationship between the allocation of disbursement and the costs required to
achieve the results.
(iv) Advance financing. ADB can provide up to 25% of its financing (i.e., $150
million) as advance disbursement. Advances can be considered for initial and
subsequent DLIs during the implementation period. The amount of advances will
be recovered from subsequent disbursements when DLIs are achieved.
Additional advances can be made once an earlier advance has been recovered
or partially recovered. The recovered advance is then available, as needed, for
additional advances (“revolving advances”), but the outstanding advance should
not at any time exceed the ceiling of 25% of ADB financing. The government will
refund any advances (or portions of advances) if the DLIs have not been met or
fully met by program completion, no later than 6 months after program
completion.
(v) Review of DLIs. During ADB review missions, the findings of the progress of the
DLIs will be discussed with the counterparts and comments provided. The DLI
matrix will be reviewed during Mid-Term Review and restructured as necessary.

2. Verification Status

21. The verification status will be tracked by using reports from the DGWR and the
independent verification agency, which will be summarized in a monitoring table such as in
Appendix 6.

D. Disbursement Allocation and Status

22. The loan proceeds will be disbursed in accordance with ADB's Loan Disbursement
Handbook (2015, as amended from time to time) and detailed arrangements agreed upon
between the government and ADB. The Loan proceeds, including ADB-administered co-
financier funds from the ASEAN infrastructure (B loan), will be disbursed to the designated bank
account under the Ministry of Finance (MOF). Financing will be disbursed over 6 years, subject
to the achievement and verification of the agreed DLIs. The financing under the A loan and the
B loan will be disbursed, subject to the achievement and verification of the agreed DLIs on a
pro-rata basis of 83.3% for the A loan and 16.7% for the B loan. Up to 25% of each loan (total
8

$150 million for both Loans A and B) in advance financing will be made available if required to
achieve results. The DGWR may submit withdrawal applications periodically (one for each the A
and B loans) along with the evidence verifying the achievement of the DLIs.

1. Expected Disbursement Allocation and Schedule

23. Appendix 7 shows the expected disbursement schedule. Disbursement status will be
monitored using the Table in Appendix 8.

III. EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK AND FINANCING

A. Expenditure Framework

1. Expected Expenditure Framework

24. The government’s expenditure for the improvement and sustainable management of
irrigation in the 74 districts across 16 provinces is estimated to be $1,679 million from 2017 to
2021 (Table 3).

25. Program expenditures. The Program will support IIP expenditures in 16 provinces,
which are estimated to be $1,679 billion from 2017 to 2021 (Table 3).
Table 3: Summary of Program Expenditure Framework, 2017-2021
(in 2016 prices)

Item Amount ($ million) Share of Total (%)

Capital expenditures
1. Infrastructure rehabilitation and upgrading 1,019 60.68
2. Operation and maintenance and management services 62 3.70
3. Planning and detailed engineering design 123 7.32
Recurrent costs
4. Operation and maintenance expenditures 408 24.33
5. Staffing and operations 67 3.97
Total 1,679 100.00
Note: Percentages may not total 100% because of rounding.
Source: Asian Development Bank estimates based on the government’s planning documents, including the national
and sector midterm plans, and other supporting sources.

2. Expenditure Status

26. The expenditure status will be monitored during implementation with the use of the table
in Appendix 9.

B. Program Financing

1. Expected Financing Plan

27. The government plans to provide at least $1.051 billion of the total cost of the broader
$1,679 million program for the 74 districts across 16 provinces from 2017 to 2021. Government
financing will cover: (i) capital costs; and (ii) recurrent costs including taxes and duties. The
World Bank through its Water Resources and Irrigation Sector Management Program will
provide $28 million. The Government has requested loans for $500 million from ADB’s ordinary
9

capital resources (A loan) and another $100 million from the ASEAN Infrastructure Fund (B
loan) for the program. The A loan will have a 17.5-year term, including a grace period of 8
years, an annual interest rate determined in accordance with ADB’s London interbank offered
rate (LIBOR)-based lending facility, a commitment charge of 0.15% per year, and such other
terms and conditions set forth in the draft loan and guarantee agreements. The B loan will have
the same term and grace period as the A loan, and an interest rate determined in accordance
with the LIBOR-based lending facility for AIF-funded loans, and such other terms and conditions
set forth in the draft loan agreement. The AIF co-financing will be administered by ADB. The
financing plan is summarized in Table 4.

Table 4: Program Financing Plan, 2017 – 2021

Source Amount ($ million) Share of Total (%)
Asian Development Bank
Ordinary capital resources (loan) 500 29.78
Government of Indonesia 1,051 62.60
ASEAN Infrastructure Fund (loan) 100 5.96
World Bank(loan) a 28 1.67
Total 1,679 100.00
ASEAN = Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
Note: Percentages may not total 100% because of rounding.
a Parallel financing provided through the Water Resources and Irrigation Sector Management Program (Phase II).

Source: Asian Development Bank estimates based on government planning documents.

2. Financing Status

28. The status of program financing will be monitored closely as indicated by Appendix 10.

IV. PROGRAM SYSTEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS

29. Implementing Arrangements. The executing agency will be the Directorate General of
Water Resources (DGWR), Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MPWH). National, provincial
and district water resource associations (WRAs) will deliver infrastructure investment and
irrigation services at the scheme level. Under the overall guidance and responsibility of the
Ministry of Home Affairs (MOHA), provincial and district planning agencies will ensure
institutional strengthening, planning and internalization of operation and maintenance (O&M)
into mid-term and annual plans. A steering committee—supported by the National Development
Planning Agency (BAPPENAS)—will provide strategic and policy guidance. The program will
rely on the government systems for program implementation. The PAP contains actions to
strengthen these systems. As part of the system strengthening, the DGWR will prepare a
detailed operation manual for the program, which will be approved by the National Steering
committee for Water Resources (NSCWR).

A. Monitoring and Evaluation System

1. Summary of Monitoring and Evaluation System

30. The monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system assessment undertaken for the program
indicated that responsibility for M&E is fragmented and dispersed among a number of
institutions. The MOF, MPWH, MOHA, MOA, and BAPPENAS have M&E systems related to
irrigation schemes, including e-monitoring systems. These systems are largely focused on
inputs and outputs, although there is awareness of the need to move forward further to capture
10

information on outcomes and impact. The DGWR’s Directorate of Operations and Maintenance
(DOM) M&E system captures key indicators for the program and will be used to monitor the
implementation of the RBL program. The DOM M&E system needs to be restructured and
expanded to cater to the new program elements. In this regard, the following actions have been
included in the program action plan: (i) increase staff strength of river basin organizations
(RBOs) and WRAs and improve their capabilities through training, capacity development, and
consultancy support; (ii) provide technical support to strengthen the DOM M&E system to a
web-based information system to incorporate program-specific indicators, including social and
gender indicators; (iii) update M&E guidelines and processes, roles and responsibilities, and a
framework that includes reporting systems; and (iv) implement the quality-assurance system
guidelines, particularly in the area of reliable data collection and reporting. The DOM system will
need to be linked to the MPWH E-Mon and MOHA e-monitoring system SIPD. The program
provides a unique opportunity to further enhance and strengthen the DOM M&E system, with a
view to eventually integrate this into the irrigation asset management information system
(IAMIS), which would be used as the M&E system in the long term, given its expected
geospatial and technological capabilities.

31. The DGWR will monitor the program and be responsible for preparing all progress and
PAP action reports. The DGWR supported by the MOHA will coordinate inputs from the various
agencies at national, provincial, and district levels. The DGWR will consolidate MOA reporting to
ensure integration between irrigation and agriculture development in reporting on the program
results framework. The monitoring reports will be disclosed to the national committee for water
resources and ADB. Within 12 months of the program’s loan closing, the MPWH will produce a
program completion report which will be shared with ADB.

B. Fiduciary Systems

1. Financial Management System

a. Summary of the Financial Management System

32. Financial Management System. The RBL program will use the Government’s financial
management systems, including the budgeting, accounting, reporting, monitoring, and auditing
arrangements, which is uniform across national and sub-national levels. The financial
management system assessment indicates moderate fiduciary risk. While some financial
management weaknesses and shortcomings have been identified, these are relatively minor
and can be effectively addressed through the proposed mitigation measures and actions set out
in the PAP and the integrated risk matrix. Key actions required to improve the financial
management system include: (i) provide technical support through training, capacity
development, and consultancy support to prepare interim financial reports on a semi-annual
basis and consolidated unaudited program financial statements covering all sources of funds on
an incremental basis; and (ii) enhance the use by central and local governments of the E-Mon
system at the MPWH, to improve the monitoring of procurement, contractual implementation,
and the physical and financial progress of the program activities. The DGWR will be responsible
for improving the financial management services for the program, with MOF support to train the
central and local government staff on preparation of the financial report of the program.

33. Financial Arrangements. Financing from the ADB loan will be disbursed subject to the
achievement and verification of the agreed DLIs. Loan proceeds will be disbursed to a
government treasury account in the Bank Indonesia for the RBL dedicated to ADB funds —
Rekening Penampungan RBL. ADB loan funds will be part of the budgetary funds and other
11

funds, and payments to suppliers and contractors will be controlled by the regular government
system. Central government funds for activities implemented by subnational agencies will be
channeled from MOF to subnational governments. Central funds transferred to subnational
governments include the specific allocation funds (DAK), general allocation fund (DAU) and
development partners financing. Development partners financing for subnational administrations
will be disbursed on the basis of the on-granting agreements between the MOF and the head of
the concerned regional administration.

34. At the central level, the DGWR,17 the Directorate General of Regional Development
(DGRD), and the Directorate of Water Resources and Irrigation (DWRI) are the agencies who
will use the program budget. For activities implemented by sub-national agencies, funds are
channeled through the on-granting mechanism, where disbursements are made on the basis of
On-Granting Agreements (OGA), or Naskah Perjanjian Hibah Daerah (NPHD), between the
MOF and the head of the concerned regional administration. The NPHD will be prepared for an
estimated amount of $214 million as per government plan.

35. Auditing and financial reporting. The program will use the Government’s fiduciary
systems for financial reporting, procurement, and auditing. These systems were assessed to
determine their ability to manage fiduciary risks and provide assurance that RBL program funds
will be used for the intended purposes, with due consideration for economy and efficiency. The
assessments found that improvements were needed in planning and budgeting, and that further
computerization was required for accounting and financial reporting. Actions have been
recommended to address identified financial management challenges and related fiduciary
risks. The Borrower shall (i) prepare its central level audited financial statements (otherwise
known as Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat); (ii) have financial statements of the program
executing agency, BAPPENAS, MOHA and MOF prepared and audited annually; (iii) prepare
unaudited financial statements for the Program in accordance with accounting principles
acceptable to ADB for FY 2017 and for each subsequent FY until the loan closing date and
furnish these to ADB no later than 6 months after the close of each FY; (iv) ensure that the
central level financial audit report as well as the financial statements of the program executing
agency, BAPPENAS, MOHA and MOF are audited by independent auditors whose
qualifications, experience and terms of reference are acceptable to ADB, in accordance with
international standards on auditing or the national equivalent acceptable to ADB; and (v) ensure
that ADB receives, no later than 9 months after the end of each fiscal year, copies of the central
level audited financial statements, financial statements of the program executing agency,
BAPPENAS, MOHA and MOF, audit report and management letter, all in the English language,
and such other information concerning these documents and the audit thereof as ADB shall
from time to time reasonably request. ADB shall disclose (i) program-related information on the
central level audited financial statements (Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat); and (ii) the
summaries of the financial statements of the program executing agency, BAPPENAS, MOHA
and MOF within 14 days of the date of ADB’s confirmation of their acceptability by posting them
on ADB’s website. The Borrower shall enable ADB, upon ADB's request, to discuss the financial
reports for the Program as specified in (i)(ii) and (iii) above, and the Borrower's financial affairs
where they relate to the Program with the auditors appointed pursuant to subsection (a)(v)
hereinabove, and shall authorize and require any representative of such auditors to participate
in any such discussions requested by ADB. This is provided that such discussions shall be
conducted only in the presence of an authorized officer of the Borrower, unless the Borrower
shall otherwise agree.

17 This includes the Directorate of Irrigation and Low Land (DILL), the Directorate of Operation and Maintenance
(DOM) and 20 river basin organizations.
12

36. Operationalization of above provisions will take into account the following: (a) for point (i)
above: unaudited financial statements for the Program will cover all sources of financing and
follow government accounting standard as per MOF regulation 177/05/2015. A template is
provided in attachment (I. Laporan Realisasi Anggaran, page 267, PMK 177/05/2015).The
financial statements do not cover performance and asset management; (b) for point (iv) above:
as per Law 15/2004 (tentang Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan TanggungJawab Keuangan
Negara), the audited financial statements of the program executing agency, BAPPENAS,
MOHA and MOF are public domain and could be accessed on request by ADB through the
auditor; (c) for point (v) above: central level audited financial statements, financial statements of
the program executing agency, BAPPENAS, MOHA and MOF, audit reports thereon and
management letter from the auditor are in Bahasa Indonesia. The ADB project team will review
and mobilize resources to translate information relevant to the program into English as needed.
If there is any difference between the English version and the original version of the document
in Bahasa Indonesia, the document in Bahasa Indonesia will prevail. Discussion on the financial
statements for the program and the Borrower's financial affairs where they relate to the program
will be at first stage conducted together between the borrower and ADB, before involving the
appointed auditor. For any finding in co-financing financed of the program from by other
development partner(s) not administered by ADB, ADB will rely on auditor’s recommendation.

2. Procurement System

a. Summary of the Procurement System

37. The key procuring entities for the program are the MPWH, along with its river basin
organizations (Balai) and WRAs at provincial and district levels. A smaller amount of
procurement will be carried out by the MOHA, BAPPENAS and planning agencies at provincial
and district levels. The RBL program will use the existing procurement planning system
(SiRUP)18 developed by the national public procurement agency (LKPP)19 and the E-Mon
system at MPWH, which captures procurement, contractual implementation, and the physical
and financial progress of infrastructure projects.

38. Procurement profile of the Program. Procurement under the program consists of: (i)
civil works for rehabilitation or upgrading of existing irrigation facilities. Most contracts are
expected to be below $10 million equivalent per contract, with an average of $300,000 to $1.5
million per contract, and more than 90% are in the range of less than $2 million per contract.
There is a small number of contracts whose value ranges between $10 million to $35 million per
contract. The procurement follows competitive bidding, simplified competitive bidding, and direct
selection following the presidential regulation Perpres 54/2010. Starting in 2015, as required by
presidential regulation 4/2015, all procurements under this category are required to go through
e-tendering within the national e-procurement system (SPSE). Farmer groups will be engaged
for very small works where appropriate, with contract value to be less than $30,000, following
simple procurement according to existing regulations. (ii) Goods. Procurement will involve small
contracts (less than $50,000) for the purchase of irrigation equipment (measurement devices,
gates, etc.). Under current government procedures and practices in the irrigation sector, this
type of contract follows simple direct selection. Due to the small and simple nature of these
contracts, no foreign bidders are anticipated; (iii) Consulting Services. A number of

18
Sistem Rencana Umum Pengadaan (SiRUP)
19 The Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah or the National Public Procurement Agency has a
reporting line to the President of the Republic of Indonesia. [Link]
13

consultancy firms will be recruited to support implementation of the design and construction
supervision through RBOs. All packages are expected to be less than $ 1million, excluding
national taxes, for packages to support the design and construction supervision. The national
threshold for the participation of international firms is Rp10 billion.; (iv) Other Services and
Goods. To support the upgrading of the irrigation asset management information system, aerial
mapping services will be contracted for an amount of less than $2 million per package. Such
contracts are not expected to attract foreign bidders; and (v) Individual Facilitators. A
significant number of field facilitators is needed for the program. Facilitators are recruited by
local governments to assist local farmer groups in villages. These are annual service-delivery
contracts with values of less than $5,000 per individual contract.

39. The standard bidding documents (SBDs)20 for each of the procurement methods are
applicable nationally, as issued by either LKPP or the MPWH. Under the current national
regulations, foreign bidders may participate only for contracts above Rp100 billion for works, $2
million for goods, and $1 million for consulting services. Assessment of the Program’s
procurement profile shows that almost all contracts are expected to be below the national
thresholds, and the nature of the contracts is such that no foreign firms would be interested in
participating.

40. Key procurement risks have been identified as follows: (i) institutional weaknesses
relating to gaps in procurement information in the SPSE, which lead to poor procurement
planning and hinder reliable procurement monitoring; (ii) factors that affect procurement
quality, such as limited competition, barriers for entry, sub-optimal documentation relating to
consultant terms of reference and request-for-proposals, which result in proposals of inadequate
quality and a cost-driven selection process for consultants, which compromises the quality
aspects; (iii) barriers to international participation for consulting services, such as the
national thresholds for consulting services, mandatory joint venture with Indonesian firms,
requirements for permits and representational offices, e-procurement systems that do not allow
international bidders, and non-availability of documentation in the English language; (iv)
variable procurement capacity across regions, leading to delays. While some sub-national
agencies have reasonable procurement capacity, many others have limited capacity to handle
procurement functions; (v) delays resulting from procedures under the on-granting
mechanism to local governments. For example, some local governments may lack a
predefined available budget for pre-financing for a procurement contract before the money is
reimbursed by the central government; and (vi) risk of fraud and corruption, which may be an
issue with some local governments, especially when responding to the accelerated pace of
programs.

41. The fiduciary assessment identified a number of actions to align procurement

procedures with the commonly accepted procurement principles of competition, efficiency and
economy, transparency, and fairness and equal opportunity. These actions are to address the
risks and systemic gaps mentioned above. They include:

(i) Supporting agencies to update the current e-procurement, e-monitoring system

and SiRUP and the actual procurement actions and reporting by each
implementing agency;
(ii) setting performance targets to improve procurement planning and linkages with
the budget document;

20 SBDs and some samples of actual bidding documents at MPWH, B(B)WS, district and provincial government levels
were reviewed.
14

(iii) implementing measures to increase competition, such as better procurement

planning and capacity development of local contractors;
(iv) conducting procurement and probity audits on 3–5 procuring entities yearly;
(v) providing technical support for documentation quality and other quality aspects,
especially for terms of reference prior to tendering;
(vi) conducting a value-for-money audit of consulting services by an independent
firm;
(vii) conducting a procurement audit of all consulting contracts after one year of
effectiveness of the RBL. The procurement audit will be carried out by the
appropriate institution in Indonesia, and the Government will take appropriate
steps to address any findings as required under Indonesian law. The audit report,
its findings, and the actions taken by the Government in response to any findings
shall be shared with ADB as soon as possible; and
(viii) Due to the restrictive requirements for international consulting firms, large
consulting packages above $1 million are excluded from the Program and will
instead be contracted through the ADB-funded Engineering Services Project21
outside the RBL program.

3. Anticorruption System

a. Summary of Anticorruption System

42. Over recent years, the Government in general and the MPWH in particular have taken
important measures to curb corruption and strengthen internal controls. To further strengthen
the MPWH’s oversight and detection mechanisms in this regard, the RBL program will use the
procurement monitoring framework and audits to detect red flags and suspicious patterns in
contract awards, and also provide support to upgrading the capacity of the internal auditor.
Overall, the assessment concluded that the anti-corruption system is aligned with international
best practices. The Guidelines to Prevent or Mitigate Fraud, Corruption, and Other Prohibited
Activities in Results-Based Lending for Programs (Anti-Corruption Guidelines, Appendix 2) were
explained to and discussed with the Government. Strengthening the procurement and financial
management systems, as well as promoting transparency of and public access to audit findings
via the DGWR and ADB websites, will go a long way towards mitigating risks.

C. Satisfying Procurement Member Country Eligibility Restrictions

43. ADB member country procurement eligibility restrictions have been discussed and
agreed with the Government. Given the nature of the program, international bidders are
expected only for large consulting services contracts. Due to the restrictive requirements for
international consulting firms, large consulting packages above Rp 10 billion are excluded from
the Program and will instead be contracted through the ADB-funded Engineering Services
Project (footnote 21).

D. Safeguard Systems

1. Summary of Safeguard System

21 ADB. 2016. Proposed Loan to the Republic of Indonesia: Accelerating Infrastructure Delivery through Better
Engineering Services Project. Manila.
15

44. The RBL Program will exclude sub-projects with: (i) category A impact for environment;
(ii) impacts on squatters residing on the DGWR’s and WRAs land; (iii) category A impact for
involuntary resettlement; and (iv) category A impact for indigenous people and activities that
directly or indirectly affect the dignity, human rights, livelihood systems, or culture and land or
territory occupied, owned, or claim by indigenous people as their ancestral domain.

45. Environment. The Program Safeguard Systems Assessment (PSSA) confirmed the
categorization for environment as B, because the potential adverse environmental impacts are
reversible and site-specific, and mitigation measures can be readily designed within the
program safeguards system (PSS), since most activities will take place within existing irrigation
systems. Potential environment impacts are related to: (i) rehabilitation and upgrading of
irrigation infrastructure; (ii) changes in river hydrology and morphology, with potential adverse
effects on aquatic habitats; (iii) reduced water quality within or upstream of the irrigation
schemes, and (iii) climate-induced impacts.

46. The country safeguards review revealed that, to a large extent, the PSS for environment
is relatively equivalent with ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS) 2009. Yet, gaps identified
by the assessment include weak screening, reporting, and compliance with the government’s
own regulations, as well as limited competent staff and budget for safeguards implementation.
There is disparity at the local government level in terms of knowledge and understanding of the
use of environmental guidelines. There are no dedicated safeguards units or staff in sub-
national irrigation agencies to oversee environmental assessment and monitoring. In addition,
some WUAs are not aware of environmental impact assessments and environmental
management, and do not know how to register complaints.

47. In order to address environmental impacts from the beginning of the project
implementation, environmental aspects, as well as the screening and categorization of impacts,
are integrated into the Social, Economic, Technical and Institutional Profile (SETIP), including a
negative checklist to ensure exclusion of environmentally critical projects. For the environmental
management of infrastructure upgrading or rehabilitation, the legal requirements of UKL-UPL/
SPPL are applicable (Minister of Environment Regulation 13/2010 on UKL-UPL and SPPL.
Environmental impact assessments and environmental management plans will be
commensurate for irrigation projects. To oversee implementation of the program’s safeguards
program actions, the safeguards teams in river basin organizations (RBOs) and water resource
associations (WRAs) and the safeguard unit under the DGWR will be strengthened. The
safeguard unit of DGWR will closely coordinate with the Directorate of Irrigation and Low Land
(DILL) under the MPWH. The DILL shall coordinate with the MOHA, Ministry of Environment
and Forestry in providing training on program implementation to local government and other
agencies and in the conduct of all environmental and social safeguard monitoring.

48. The DILL will ensure transfer of information and assignment of program safeguards
actions to the participating sub-national agencies to ensure that regulations and guidelines in
place are well understood and complied with. The DGWR safeguards unit will coordinate with
participating provincial and district technical agencies in the implementation and evaluation of
program plans and activities, as well as monitor safeguard compliance. It is recommended to
hire national environment and social safeguards specialists to assist the government in
monitoring the implementation of the safeguards program actions and in training the sub-
national agencies. The key actions to for improvement are listed in the PAP, including the
responsible agencies and the timeline for implementation.
16

49. Involuntary Resettlement. The PSSA confirmed that the program is classified as
category B for involuntary resettlement because impacts from irrigation systems rehabilitation or
upgrading are not anticipated to be significant. The rehabilitation of irrigation canals and
associated structures will be conducted on existing right of way (ROW). Land acquisition is not
envisaged, but rehabilitation works may result in the loss of assets located along the ROW, with
potential relocation of people who live along the canals. The upgrading of irrigation canals may
require additional land for the construction of inspection roads. Most provisions on land
acquisition and resettlement (LAR) using government land acquisition law procedures are in line
with ADB SPS 2009 principles.

50. The assessment of implementation practices in the irrigation program reveals the
following key issues: (i) for district programs, compensation for affected assets owned by non-
land rights holders (squatters) are provided for using the uang kerohiman scheme, which may
be lower than the market rate. In some cases that involve regular canal maintenance programs,
there is no compensation for affected assets and temporary loss of income. For national
programs, new relocation areas are provided and lost assets are compensated using uang
kerohiman; (ii) no improvement of the living standards of displaced poor and other vulnerable
groups, especially non-land rights holders, are delivered; (iii) a grievance-redress mechanism
(GRM) with a time frame set for complaints resolution is not established for land clearing; (iv)
livelihood restoration programs (LRP) for affected vulnerable people are provided for programs
financed by multilateral agencies and state-owned enterprises, while for local government
programs there are none, resulting in a lack of clarity on benefit sharing; (v) no relocation
assistance for entitled parties is provided; and (vi) regular monitoring by agencies does not
include a resettlement outcome, as prevailing land acquisition regulations do not require
monitoring and assessment of resettlement outcomes.22

51. Indigenous People. The assessment also confirmed category B for Indigenous People
safeguards. The program might cause potential temporary loss of income for them. Severe
impacts on indigenous peoples’ dignity, human rights, culture, knowledge, and institution are
not envisaged. The program excludes activities that affect to the relocation of the indigenous
peoples from their land or territory occupied, owned, or claimed as their ancestral domain and
activities that cause category A impact for indigenous people according to ADB SPS 2009. The
existence of a customary legal communities safeguard is recognized in the Indonesian laws and
regulations, and maps to identify indigenous peoples are produced by the Ministry of Social
Affairs, the World Bank, and AMAN (National Indigenous People Alliance). These maps will be
used to screen and identify indigenous peoples for the program implementation. With respect to
implementation, significant gaps/issues have been identified: (i) screening is weak in
determining impact on masyarakat hukum adat; however, the development program considers
the local culture, including customary communities; and (ii) program outcomes are not
documented and disclosed to beneficiaries.

52. The program will exclude sub-programs with: (i) category A impact for environment23,

22 Perpres 71 does not require monitoring and assessment of outcomes of resettlement monitoring. By law (Land Law
2012) BPN is responsible only for the implementation stage and delivering result-stage monitoring. The planning
stage is the responsibility of the institution needing land and the preparation stage is the responsibility of the
institution needing land as well as the provincial government.
23
Definition of category A: An activity is classified category A if it is likely to have significant adverse environmental
impacts that are irreversible, diverse, or unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area larger than the sites or
facilities subject to physical works.
17

involuntary resettlement24, and indigenous peoples25; (ii) significant impacts on squatters

residing on the DGWR’s and water resources agencies’ (WRAs) land; and (iii) relocation of
indigenous peoples from their land or territory occupied, owned, or claimed as their ancestral
domain.

53. Institutional Assessment. The DGWR has set up a land facilitation sub-division and a
task force for monitoring, evaluation, and coordination for the acceleration of land acquisition in
water resources infrastructure. At district and provincial level, the strong participation of the
Land Office and BAPPEDA/District Secretary (Sekretaris Daerah/ SETDA) enforce compliance
to social safeguards at national and provincial levels. However, the assessment identified the
following institutional weaknesses: (i) ad hoc functioning of staff under executing and
implementing agencies and BAPPEDA to handle safeguards issues depends very much on the
source and availability of funding; (ii) knowledge of government staff of environmental and social
safeguards, including land acquisition laws and regulations, is limited; (iii) for programs financed
by the national budget, the assignment focuses more on land acquisition progress as per
government procedures; (iv) there is no clear role/responsibility for monitoring, reporting, and
evaluation of overall implementation of safeguards at the regional level; (v) minimal involvement
of the Environmental Agency (BLH) in environmental safeguard procedures in some districts;
and (vi) lack of coordination across levels from national, province, and district/sub-district with
resentment at the local level regarding roles in implementing programs on the ground in relation
to top-level oversight initiatives.

54. Based on the identified impacts and gaps, there are two approaches to be applied to
address the impacts and gaps: (i) improve technical aspect for environment, resettlement, and
indigenous peoples safeguards to comply with the government’s requirements and ADB SPS
principles; (ii) strengthen institutional capacities in handling environmental and social
safeguards; and (iii) improving reporting and monitoring. The DGWR will issue and implement a
guidance on screening criteria for selecting program components to ensure the program will
exclude activities that: (i) would be classified category A for environment, involuntary
resettlement, and indigenous peoples according to ADB SPS; (ii) significant impacts on
squatters residing on the DGWR’s and WRAs land; and (iii) relocation of indigenous peoples
from tier land or territory as their ancestral.

55. The RBL program will strengthen the system and capacity as follows: (i) strengthen the
delivery of social/livelihood program for entitled parties considered vulnerable and for severely
affected persons; (ii) ensure that transitional allowance for physical relocation is covered under
compensation for emotional loss; (iii) conduct consultations with host communities if the
resettlement option is taken for compensation; (iv) manage right-of-way to prevent the return of
affected persons and new encroachers; and (v) legalize acquired land assets. For indigenous
peoples, the PAP includes the following key actions: (i) prepare guidance on screening check
lists, impact assessment of program to indigenous people including culturally appropriate
grievance-redress mechanisms (GRM), and meaningful consultation; and (ii) include the factor
of indigenous people in the SETIP.

24 A proposed project is classified as category A for resettlement if there are 200 or more persons experience major
impacts, which are defined as (i) being physically displaced from housing, or (ii) losing 10% or more of their
productive (income generating) assets because of the project.
25
A proposed project is classified as category A if it is likely to have significant impacts on IP. When impacts in any
of the areas are adverse and widespread at the community or sub-community (rather than individual or household)
level, they are generally rated significant (category A).
18

56. Institutional strengthening will also be promoted through: (i) establishment and
strengthening of dedicated units for both environmental and social safeguards in RBOs and
WRAs with the provision of generic terms of reference; (ii) training of focal persons for social
and environmental safeguards in RBOs and WRAs; (iii) recruitment of different safeguards
specialists respectively for environment, resettlement, and indigenous peoples to ensure a
timely implementation of the PAP; (iv) training orientation across levels (executing and
implementing agencies and participating agencies) on Country Systems with key concerns for
environment, involuntary resettlement, indigenous peoples, safeguards and PSSA action plan;
(v) awareness-raising and capacity development for WRAs to assure that the environmental
management plan (EMP) implementation is carried out. [Link] is used as the basis
for monitoring/reporting of compliance to environmental regulations; (vi) development of
guidance for culturally appropriate GRMs with clear roles, responsibilities, and timeline covering
social, environmental, and other issues; (vii) preparation of a standard format and guidance for
reporting on impacts and actions related to land acquisition/resettlement and land clearing a and
post-land acquisition and resettlement (LAR); (viii) improvement of monitoring of LAR outcomes
and their impacts on the living standards of displaced person (if any) through reviewing
complaints received and conducting consultation with community, and take necessary actions if
impacts are found to impact the livelihood status of affected persons; and (ix) annual monitoring
of program action plan implementation, including any complaint handling, is compiled by the
DGWR and submitted to ADB.

E. Gender and Social Dimensions

57. The program will primarily benefit local farming communities, including women,
landowners and agricultural workers. The program social and gender assessment (PSGA)
reveals the following gaps and risks: (i) institutional capacity at provincial and district level to
support a pro-poor and gender-based budgeting in irrigated agricultural planning remains weak;
(ii) farmers in general, and women in particular, are not aware of the benefits of social
organization for accessing technologies and capital financing nor of the markets required to
develop farm and agricultural businesses. Additionally, the dissemination of irrigation laws and
regulations do not always reach down to community level; (iii) the WUA organization may not
reflect the aspirations and needs of poor farmers and women users. Poor cultivators often face
difficulties in paying dues so that the groups consist mainly of land owners who can pay the
dues. Women in charge of agricultural production, but without property rights, are usually not
members of WUAs; (iv) planning, management, and O&M of irrigation systems do not
systematically involve consultations with women users; (v) few women are appointed to
strategic positions within the various institutions driving the irrigation sector, such as the district
and provincial planning agencies (BAPPEDA), irrigation commissions, WUAs, WUAFs, and the
agricultural and water resources agencies; and (vi) the institutional capacity to conduct gender
mainstreaming in the irrigation sector is limited.

58. To realize the full potential of the program in reducing poverty and empowering women,
elements from this diagnostic have been translated into a social and gender action plan for the
program. This plan will aim at: (i) accelerating the capacity development of stakeholders; (ii)
increasing the share of women in strategic positions; (iii) ensuring better social organization of
WUAs; and (iv) strengthening institutions for pro-poor monitoring and gender mainstreaming in
the irrigation sector. The social and gender actions with indicators as reflected in the PAP will be
implemented through DGWR, MOHA, BAPPEDA, WRAs, and agricultural agencies at national,
provincial and district level.
19

F. Communication and Information Disclosure Arrangements

59. In its programmatic approach and components, the Program is based on participatory
approaches and extensive consultations with stakeholders, including farmers groups, women
and community organizations, civil society organizations, technical agencies and local
governments. The program will also adopt an open-communication approach with procurement,
audit findings, and all other measures to improve systems. The use of electronic means to
disclose financial, procurement, safeguards, and program progress will ensure a broad
audience, as well as the means to reach other decision-makers in the non-program provinces.
This policy of open communication at all levels will continue during program implementation.
ADB’s Public Communication Policy has been shared and ADB disclosure requirements have
been discussed with the Government.26 The communication and disclosure actions under the
program will include participatory consultation meetings with emphasis on participation of
women and other vulnerable groups, public awareness-raising activities at district or scheme
level, media, and websites.

G. Development Coordination

60. The program promotes a shift towards a more comprehensive approach that focuses on
sector-wide reforms and achievement of results. It includes a set of common and
complementary disbursement-linked indicators developed in close consultation with the
government and other stakeholders, reinforcing the motivation to focus on results. The program
provides a framework to coordinate development efforts and harmonize development
approaches by various development partners. It enables a more systematic and progressive
approach for the government to meet its strategic goals for improving irrigation delivery and
sustainability through (i) using the DLIs tied to the government targets; and (ii) strengthening,
using and demonstrating the country systems for implementation, management, and monitoring.
The national steering committee for water resources—supported by BAPPENAS—will
strengthen coordination between the principal ministries involved (MPWH, MOHA, MOA)
through its strategic and policy guidance. The BAPPENAS will also ensure its development
partners coordination role to ensure that approaches are aligned and deserved the objectives of
the program.

V. INTEGRATED RISKS AND MITIGATING MEASURES

A. Key Risks and Mitigating Measures

61. Major risks and mitigating measures are summarized in Table 5. The overall benefits
and impacts are expected to outweigh the risks and costs.

26 ADB. 2011. Public Communication Policy. Manila.

20

Table 5: Status of Integrated Risk Assessment and Mitigating Measures

(As of February 2017)
Rating Without the
Risks Mitigating Measures Key Mitigating Measures
Results
Weak institutional capacities (technical, Moderate DOM to identify lagging districts,
organizational) and poor motivation conduct awareness raising sessions,
may delay outcome performance and provide technical support and
measurement in some districts. training to WRAs on reporting.

Gaps in coordination and delay in Moderate Ensure joint planning and

implementation between irrigation and convergence with MOA, giving
agricultural interventions could put priority to setting the baselines for
outcome achievement at risk. agricultural productivity in the
program area. Conduct joint
monitoring sessions with
counterparts, especially MOA
supported by IFAD, to track
agricultural interventions closely.

Incorporation of RP2I into district and High Conduct socialization and advocacy
province five-year development plans sessions designed to persuade key
may be delayed or rejected since these members of regional parliaments.
depend on the political will of regional Government to make the
parliaments. internalization of RP2I a mandatory
requirement under the regulations to
be issued under Law 23/2014.

Variable capacities, especially at Moderate The program will build the capacity
subnational level (institutional and of agencies and stakeholders
community) (i) pose risks to effective involved in the program. The
uptake, institutionalization, and capacity development framework will
implementation of regulatory be monitored through (i) the setting
frameworks and processes; (ii) may of supervisory and monitoring
impede management, O&M activities; mechanisms to monitor adherence to
and (iii) may delay operationalization of frameworks and guidelines; and
WUAs and set back the assessment of (ii) the involvement of a cross-
priority schemes. section of key stakeholders (e.g.,
WRAs, WUAs, and irrigation
commissions) in the monitoring,
which will not only mitigate risks but
also build capacity in the process.
Expenditure and financing
The government may have financing Low Monitor the status of program
shortfalls and may be unable to deliver financing closely and discuss
fully on its commitments to the alternative measures with the
program. concerned ministries. Improvement
of irrigation systems is a priority of
the Cabinet.
Fiduciary
a. Financial management
Lack of capacity at subnational level Moderate Development partners’ continuous
support to strengthen the PFM
systems in Indonesia through policy-
21

Rating Without the

Risks Mitigating Measures Key Mitigating Measures
based projects, and technical
assistance activities.
The current system does not prepare Moderate Consultants will be recruited to help
consolidated financial statements for the DGWR to consolidate financial
specific programs. Staff can use only statements from the current country
manual methods to consolidate the system and propose necessary
reports. reforms to improve the system.
Some government procedures for Moderate Build capacity and strengthen
accounting and financial reporting have monitoring in the area of financial
weaknesses, i.e., different systems and management and reporting.
regulation between central government
and/or line ministry and local Establish coordination between
government, and staff unfamiliarity with central level (line ministry) and
new implementation of standards for agencies at local levels of
accrual accounting. government.

The internal Ministry Auditor does not Moderate Mobilize resources to support the
produce a consolidated audit report for independent auditor in consolidating
the overall program. audit reports for the overall program.

The quality of audit by inspectors Moderate ADB support through the State
general in line ministries and local Accountability Revitalization Project
government inspectorates remains by providing nationwide training to
substandard, with little focus on risk- government auditors and public
based audit. financial officer in central and local
government.
b. Procurement
Limited competition, barriers to entry Substantial Implement measures to increase
and international participation, competition and improve quality,
suboptimal documentation, and cost- including better procurement
driven selection process for planning, capacity development of
consultants affect procurement quality local contractors, technical support
for documentation, conduct of
procurement audits on three to five
procuring entities yearly, and a
value-for-money audit of consulting
services by an independent firm.
c. Anticorruption
Despite important measures taken by Substantial (i) strengthen procurement and
the government to curb corruption and financial management systems as
strengthen internal controls, risks are above, using procurement
still substantial. monitoring frameworks and audits to
raise red flags; (ii) strengthen
capacity of internal auditor; (iii)
promote transparency of and public
access to audit findings via DGWR
and ADB websites
Safeguards
a. Environment
Limited capacities at subnational level Substantial (i) update screening and reporting
may lead to little or no assessment and procedures to ensure that excluded
screening processes for environmental activities are not accounted for;
22

Rating Without the

Risks Mitigating Measures Key Mitigating Measures
impacts at district level, and non- (ii) adopt a negative checklist;
adherence to environmental safeguard (iii) update MPWH guidance and
regulations. environment management plan; (iv)
conduct awareness raising and
capacity development; (v) strengthen
disclosure through an online
platform.
b. Involuntary resettlement
Limited capacities at subnational level Substantial The program will provide awareness
may lead to non-adherence to social raising and institutional
safeguard regulations. strengthening to agencies involved in
the program. Monitoring will be
conducted regularly to ensure
compliance with existing regulations.
The program will exclude activities that Substantial The reporting function will be
have (i) category A impact for strengthened through capacity
involuntary resettlement and for building. Specific screening and
indigenous people, (ii) significant reporting forms will be developed to
impacts on squatters residing on ensure that excluded activities are
DGWR and WRA land, and (iii) not accounted for.
significant physical relocation of
affected persons with title. There is a
risk that the government may not
exclude those activities from the
annual reporting on DLIs.
Operating environment
Complex and prolonged government Substantial The National Steering Committee for
approval procedures may delay Water Resources, chaired by the
program implementation. deputy for infrastructure affairs,
BAPPENAS and consisting of
related director generals from
several ministries, will serve as the
program steering committee and
coordinate program implementation.
ADB will continue to work with the
government to streamline its
approval procedures.
Overall RBL program risk Substantial
ADB = Asian Development Bank, BAPPENAS = Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Nasional (National
Development Planning Agency), DGWR = Directorate General of Water Resources, DLI = disbursement-linked
indicator, DOM = Directorate of Operation and Maintenance, IFAD = International Fund for Agricultural Development,
MOA = Ministry of Agriculture, MPWH = Ministry of Public Works and Housing, O&M = operation and maintenance,
PFM = public financial management, RBL = results-based lending, RP2I = rencana pengembangan dan pengelolaan
irigasi (irrigation development and management plan), WRA = water resources agency, WUA = water users
association.
Note: Risk factors are assessed against two dimensions: (i) the likelihood that the risk will occur, and (ii) the impact of
the risk on the outcome. Rating scale: low = low likelihood and low impact; moderate = substantial to high likelihood
but low to moderate impact; substantial = low to moderate likelihood but substantial to high impact; high = high
likelihood and high impact.
Sources: Asian Development Bank; Government of Indonesia staff.
23

VI. PROGRAM ACTION PLAN

A. Status of Program Action Plan

62. The PAP is set out in Table 6. The actions included in the PAP will be reflected and
reviewed in annual performance reports by ADB and the government.
24

Table 6: Status of Program Action Plan

(As of 9 February 2017)

No. Action Responsible Time Frame for

Agency Implementation
Planning for Results Achievement
1 (i) Strengthen coordination mechanisms and integration between agriculture and irrigation by (i) NSCWR, DWRI (i) 2017
ensuring systematic planning and reviews; and (ii) prepare an operation manual for the program (ii) DGWR for (ii) 2017 onward
approval by
NSCWR
2 Update the medium-term expenditure framework annually DWRI Annual
Outcome
3 Conduct (i) awareness campaign with farmers and WUAs, and (ii) advocacy sessions with regional MOHA 2017 onward
parliaments to ensure integration of RP2I into district and province five-year development plans.
The government to make the internalization of RP2I a mandatory requirement under the
regulations to be issued under Law 23/2014.
4 Conduct regular representative farm input–output surveys covering program and non-program DGWR, MOA 2017 onward
schemes for better understanding of the program performance, outcomes, and impacts
Results Area 1: Systems and institutional capacity for sustainable irrigated agriculture
strengthened
5 Strengthen institutional capacity through (i) development and implementation of a capacity (i) DGWR, MOHA; (i) to (iii) 2017
development framework;a (ii) recruitment of consultant to support the program;b and (ii) DGWR, onward
(iii) establishment and/or strengthening of dedicated units for environment and social safeguards in MOHA, DWRI;
RBOs and WRAs (iii) RBO, WRAs
6 Strengthen independent verification agency technical capacity for verification of DLIs by updating DGWR, MOHA, 2017
verification guidelines and conducting a training program DWRI, BPKP
7 Improve awareness of subnational agencies regarding latest regulations, guidelines, and DGWR, MOHA (i) 2017,
requirements for engineering design, social and environment safeguards, and M&E: (i) prepare a (ii) 2017 onward
dissemination plan; (ii) conduct awareness raising campaign, targeting subnational agencies, on
latest regulations; and (iii) set up water resources knowledge management centers to function as
one-stop shops for providing information and knowledge
8 Strengthen reporting and M&E system: (i) upgrade the DOM reporting system to include all key (i) DGWR; (i) 2017;
indicators and make it web-based; (ii) update M&E guidelines and processes; (iii) ensure the (ii) DGWR, (ii) 2017;
official MOEF online system ([Link]) for public disclosure of environment documents is MOHA; (iii) RBO, (iii) 2017
used; (iv) ensure preparation and disclosure of reports for land clearing and/or vulnerable groups; WRA; (iv) RBO, onward;
(v) strengthen MPWH and MOHA reporting to incorporate program-specific indicators, including WRA, DGWR; (iv) 2017
environmental monitoring compliance and social and gender indicators, with gender-disaggregated (v) DGWR, onward,
data; and (vi) introduce aerial data collection to obtain (a) topography and asset location, and MOHA; (v) 2017 onward,
(b) dimension of canals and drains to be automatically incorporated into the IAMIS. (vi) DGWR (vi) 2017
25

Results Area 2: Irrigation operation, maintenance, and management improved

9 Improve participation of women, WUAs, and farmer groups: (i) identify schemes/communities (i) RBO, WRA, (i) 2017 onward,
requiring special efforts to increase community/female participation during (a) each SETIP MOHA, MOA; (ii) 2017
exercise, and (b) baseline data collection on DMF indicators relating to women’s and farmers’ (ii) DGWR,
participation; and (ii) prepare and disseminate guidance on screening check lists, impact Ministry of Social
assessment of program to indigenous people including GRMs, and meaningful consultation Affairs, AMAN
Results Area 3: Irrigation infrastructure improved
Environment
10 Improve environmental management: (i) update the MPWH guidance on categorizing irrigation (i) DGWR in (i) 2017, (ii) 2017
rehabilitation projects to UKL/UPL or SPPL—the regulation will include (a) checklist to ensure the consultation with
exclusion of environmentally critical projects, (b) EMP and monitoring requirements and format; MOEF; (ii) DGWR
and (ii) integrate EMP and monitoring requirements into technical specifications as per of the
contract requirements for civil works.
Involuntary resettlement and negotiated land acquisition
11 For land acquisition using Law 2/2012 procedure: (i) strengthen the delivery of social/livelihood (i) to (v) DGWR, (i) to (iii) 2017–
program for entitled parties considered vulnerable and severely affected personsd—could be RBOs, WRAs 2020
provided by local government program; (ii) clarify and agree for physical relocation to include
transitional allowance; (iii) advise affected persons on using cash compensation wisely; (iv) for
non-land right holders (squatters), improve compensation and its delivery for non-land assets at
replacement cost along the irrigation channel; and (v) protect and manage right-of-way to prevent
return of affected persons and new encroachers and (vi) legalize land assets.
Institutional capacity for social and environment safeguards
12 Improve GRMs: (i) develop/strengthen guidance for GRMs, with clear roles, responsibilities, and (i) DGWR, MOHA; (i) to (iii) 2019
time lines covering social, environment, and other issues; (ii) ensure that GRMs are made (ii) RBOs, WRAs,
available through various media (phone lines, websites, newspaper, radio); and (iii) strengthen BAPPEDAs;
public relation units in RBOs, WRAs, and planning agencies to handle complaints. (iii) RBOs, WRAs,
Procurement
13 Improve procurement systems and delivery: (i) improve the use of e-procurement and (i) to (iii) MPWH, (i) to (v) 2017;
e-monitoring system to ensure linkages between SiRUP and the actual procurement actions by MOHA, (vi) 2018
each implementing agency, along with their reporting in the system; (ii) improve procurement BAPPENAS, local
planning, and ensure that all procurement packages (including those below the threshold for governments;
e-procurement) are entered in the SiRUP, and that the SiRUP links with the budget document; (iv) MPWH;
(iii) increase competition, measured as the number of technically compliant bids for civil works (v) MPWH,
contracts, through better procurement planning and capacity development of local contractors to MOHA,
meet the requirements of the bidding documents—better procurement planning will include the BAPPENAS;
aggregation of requirements and avoid bidding out all contracts simultaneously; (iv) conduct (vi) MPWH
procurement and probity audits of three to five procuring entities yearly; (v) share and discuss all
terms of reference with ADB prior to tendering; (vi) procuring the large consulting services needed
for the program under the ADB-funded Engineering Services Project, and (vii) have an
independent firm carry out a value-for-money audit of the consulting services in the last year of the
26

results-based lending, and share the results of the audit with ADB as soon as possible.
Fiduciary
14 Strengthen financial management: (i) prepare consolidated unaudited program financial statement (i) DGWR and (i) 2017 onward;
covering all sources of funds; (ii) enhance/strengthen the use of the e-monitoring system at central local (ii) 2017
and local government to capture the information on financial and physical reports by using a governments; (ii)
standard measurement (i.e., hectare or kilometer) to enable the government to monitor the DGWR
achievement of the program in terms of financial and physical achievement.
Gender mainstreaming
15 Key actions to improve gender mainstreaming: (i) conduct gender audits of all guidelines; DGWR, DWRI, 2017 onward
(ii) include gender mainstreaming in the SETIP and integrate findings into the irrigated agriculture MOHA, MOA,
management plan to ensure women smallholders’ interests related to location, alignment, and RBOs, and WRAs
access to irrigation infrastructure are addressed and their access to commercial crops and access
to value chain services for enhancing productivity and diversification of produce are improved; and
(iii) ensure the establishment and monitoring of (a) a 30% quota for women farmers representation
in WUA executive committees, and (b) a 20% target for women’s participation in local construction
committees involved in the planning and design of local irrigation infrastructure investments.
ADB = Asian Development Bank; AMAN = Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara (Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago); BAPPEDA = Badan Perencanaan
dan Pembangunan Daerah (provincial and district planning and development agency); BAPPENAS = Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Nasional (National
Development Planning Agency); BPKP = Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (Financial and Development Supervisory Board); DGWR = Directorate
General of Water Resources; DLI = disbursement-linked indicator; DOM = Directorate of Operation and Maintenance; DMF = design and monitoring framework;
DWRI = Directorate of Water Resources and Irrigation; EMP = environmental management plan; GRM = grievance redress mechanism; IAMIS = irrigation asset
management information system; M&E = monitoring and evaluation; MOA = Ministry of Agriculture; MOEF = Ministry of Environment and Forestry; MOHA = Ministry of
Home Affairs; MPWH = Ministry of Public Works and Housing; O&M = operation and maintenance; NSCWR = National Steering Committee for Water Resources;
RBO = river basin organization; RP2I = Rencana Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan Irigasi (Irrigation Development and Management Plans); SETIP = social,
economic, technical, and institutional profile; SiRUP = Sistem Rencana Umum Pengadaan (procurement planning system); SPPL = Surat Pernyataan Pengelolaan
Lingkungan (commitment letter for environmental management and monitoring); UKL/UPL = Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan – Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan
(environmental management and monitoring measure, substitute of Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan (AMDAL [Environmental Impact Analysis]) for moderate
scale projects; WRA = water resources agency; WUA = water users association.
a This covers (i) program management including financial management, procurement, and M&E; (ii) environment and social safeguards implementation; (iii) gender

mainstreaming; and (iv) engineering and planning.

b This covers (i) program management including financial management and M&E; (ii) improvement of guidelines (engineering, O&M); (iii) engineering designs and

construction supervision for irrigation rehabilitation; (iv) O&M and management services including surveys; (v) environment and social safeguards implementation;
and (vi) M&E.
27

Detailed Program Action Plan

(As of February 2017)
N Key gap Proposed Action Indicator Responsibility Time frame Budget source
Planning for Results achievement
The RBL modality has the potential to Strengthen coordination IPDMIP overall and annual workplans DGWR, DWRI, 2017 on DGWR, MOHA,
create synergies between externally- mechanisms by ensuring integrate irrigation and agriculture MOHA, MOA MOA, DWRI
financed projects and national programs, systematic planning and reviews development as the basis for the on
but is also exposed to the risk of at central, province, district and granting agreement between national
fragmentation arising from poor scheme levels and sub national government.
coordination among the many different
stakeholders across different sectors and Workplans set out (a) activities (b)
levels reviews and (c) reporting
mechanisms at each level, for
achieving each result in the results
framework as well as the supporting
results in the PAP

Overall and annual work plans for the NSCWR, DWRI

program endorsed by the NSCWR

Prepare an operation manual for Plan prepared by DGWR and DWGR, NSCWR 2017 DGWR, DWRI
the program approved by NSCWR
Outcome achievement and
measurement
The DGWR performance index (IKSI) is Identify lagging districts from the Problem solving teams organized to DOM, MOHA, 2017, 2018 DOM, MOHA
one of the outcome indicators. The index current state of the IKSI identify and target districts for which
and means of verification are conceptually database. IKSI reporting is a problem
sound, but the organizational and Organize WRA teams backed up
technical capacity of districts vary widely. by DGWR to conduct # national and subnational staff
The gap among districts is not only socialization sessions at district trained in IKSI assessment, data
technical, but also one of organization and levels, identify the bottlenecks in collection and reporting
motivation. reporting, and train/assist local
teams in resolving these
Gaps in coordination between irrigation Ensure joint planning and Baseline data set for agricultural MOA 2017 MOA
and agricultural interventions could put convergence with MOA, giving interventions
outcome achievement at risk priority to setting the baseline for
agricultural productivity in the
program area
Incorporation of RP2I into district and Conduct socialization and Advocacy session(s) held with DPRD MOHA 2017 on MOHA
province five-year development plans will advocacy sessions designed to members in each district/province
depend on the political will of regional persuade key members of
parliaments regional parliaments (DPRD)
28

N Key gap Proposed Action Indicator Responsibility Time frame Budget source
Results area 1: Systems and
institutional capacity for sustainable
irrigated agriculture strengthened
Improving delivery systems for irrigated Set up supervisory and Local monitoring mechanisms are set DGWR, DWRI, 2017 on DGWR, DWRI,
agriculture management will require not monitoring mechanisms early to up in each Program district MOHA MOHA
only the development and issuance of monitor adherence to the
sound guidelines and regulations, which guidelines Spot checks are conducted by central
are already planned as a DLI, but also Involve a cross-section of key teams
adherence to these guidelines. stakeholders (WRAs, WUAs,
Irrigation Commissions, etc.)
Institutional reforms require the support Build political support among Meetings conducted with the MOHA 2017 on MOHA
and involvement of local decision makers local decision makers for (a) IMU respective District Head and
(b) Irrigation Commission (c) Governor in all Program districts and
RP2I endorsement provinces

Strengthen support to Regulation for participatory irrigation MOHA/MOA 2017 on MOHA

subnational governments development and development or
Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan
Sistem Irigasi Partisipatip (PPISP)
issued by sub national governmentsa

Regulation for agriculture land MOHA/MOA 2017 on MOHA

protection issued by sub national
governmentsb.

Consistency between land use and MOHA 2017 on MOHA

spatial plans verified
Institutional reforms also require a strong Set up Water resources WRKMC Concept formulated and DGWR 2017 on DGWR and MOHA
knowledge base. In order to avoid knowledge management centers endorsed by DGWR in 2017, Xxx
mistakes made elsewhere and to replicate (WRKMC) , to function as “one- WR-KMC established in 2018, Xxx
best practices, subnational authorities stop” shops for providing WR-KMC established in 2018, and
require access to relevant knowledge and information and knowledge Xxx knowledge management centers
best practices established by 2021
Conduct study on performance Study conducted DWRI 2017 on DWRI
based contract for construction
and O&M
Pilot a model for water Model piloted DGWR 2017 on ADB
productivity measurement and
disseminate lessons learnt
Only 30% of sub national agencies report Establish communication 50% of subnational agencies report DOM, MOHA 2017 on DOM, MOHA

a In line with the Ministry of Public Works and Housing Regulation 30/2015 and Law 23/2014
b In line with the Law 41/2009 on protection of sustainable agriculture land and Law 26/2007 on spatial planning
29

N Key gap Proposed Action Indicator Responsibility Time frame Budget source
to DGWR on the use of DAK funding for mechanisms to remind WRAs to on DAK use in 2016, 75% in 2017,
rehabilitation of irrigation systems report on DAK use 100% in 2018

The reporting on achievements of DAK Conduct awareness sessions

financing needs to be improved so that
subnational governments can optimize
this funding source
Monitoring and predictability of financing Update the medium-term Updated medium-term expenditure DWRI Annual DWRI
for irrigation sector is fragmented expenditure framework for framework from 2017
irrigation rehabilitation, O&M and
management
Limited staff resources for program and Recruit services for (i) program Consultant recruited as per program DGWR, MOHA, 2017 DGWR, MOHA,
financial management, safeguards management including financial requirements DWRI DWRI
monitoring, engineering design and management and M&E, (ii)
supervision and O&M services works improvement of guidelines
(engineering, O&M); (iii)
engineering designs and
construction supervision for
irrigation rehabilitation, (iv) O&M
and management services
including surveys, and (v)
environment and social
safeguards implementation and
M&E
Technical capacity of the independent Strengthen IVA technical Verification guidelines developed and DGWR, MOHA, 2017 DGWR
verification agency (IVA) is limited for the capacity for verification of DLIs approved DWRI, BPKP
sector by conducting a training program
through the MPWH training IVA staff trained MPWH training 2017 DGWR
centers (DIKLAT) to strengthen centers
technical capacity of BPKP staff Technical support provided by 2017 – DGWR
to verify DLIs RBOs/WRAs and/or third party 2021
(university, consultant)
DOM reporting is not complete as sub Upgrade the DOM reporting DOM reporting system upgraded to DOM 2017 DOM
national agencies do not report on a system to include all key capture all indicators and be web
regular basis indicators and be web based based

Lack of understanding of the M&E Establish clear M&E guidelines M&E guidelines endorsed and DOM 2017 DOM
process and processes, roles and disseminated
responsibilities, and a framework
M&E guidelines and reporting systems are that includes reporting systems.
inconsistently implemented

Inaccurate data collection because of Use the IAMIS to track crop IAMIS updated with latest data set DOM, RBOs, 2017 – DOM, RBOs,
30

N Key gap Proposed Action Indicator Responsibility Time frame Budget source
manual input into databases or reports. production and cropping WRAs 2021 WRAs
patterns, and the availability of
water in the long term, and
strengthen IAMIS to measure
IKSI (see above)
DOM 2017 DOM
Capacity development at all Staff trained
government levels
Reporting does not capture gender and Strengthen MPWH and MOHA Reporting forms revised and agreed DGWR, MOHA, 2017 on DGWR, MOHA
social indicators reporting to incorporate program- DWRI
specific indicators, including Updated reporting forms
environmental monitoring disseminated
compliance and social and
gender indicators with gender- Annual reports produced
disaggregated data.

Update MPWH and MOHA MIS

reporting forms and prepare
annual M&E report
Results Area 2. Irrigation operation,
maintenance, and management
improved
Modernization following the Government’s Support the development and 2016: Modernization guidelines DGWR 2017 on DGWR
technical standards is a relatively new update of modernization completed and officially endorsed;
concept and much support will be needed guidelines, and apply these to 2017: modernization assessments
to prepare and implement this approach the planned modernization completed for 2 irrigation schemes;
assessments. 2018: modernization assessments
completed for 2 irrigation schemes
The level of participation among women, Identify schemes/communities DMF indicators are achieved on time MOHA, MOA 2017 on MOHA, MOA
WUAs and farmer groups varies widely, requiring special efforts to
especially the participation of women in increase community/female
decision making bodies participation during (a) each
SETIP exercise and (b) baseline
data collection on DMF indicators
relating to women’s and farmers’
participation.
Screening is weak in determining impact Prepare technical guidance on Guidance prepared and disseminated DGWR in 2017 DGWR
on indigenous people screening check lists, impact collaboration
assessment of program to with Ministry of
indigenous people including Social, AMAN
GRM, and meaningful and support by
consultation ADB
31

N Key gap Proposed Action Indicator Responsibility Time frame Budget source
Indigenous people is included in WRA and BAPPEDA staff trained on MOHA 2017 MOHA
the SETIP indigenous peoples screening, social
impact assessment (SIA) and
consultation

Indigenous people’s socio economic MOHA 2017 – MOHA

situation and project potential impact 2021
included in the SETIP
Data collection for irrigation asset is weak Introduce aerial data collection to Technical specifications for aerial DOM, DILL 2017 DOM, DILL
and fragmented obtain (i) topography and asset surveys agreed
location, (ii) dimension of canals
and drains to be automatically Contractors recruited for surveys and DOM 2017 DOM
incorporated into the IAMIS data processing

Improve field check procedures Field check procedures and

and arrangements arrangements endorsed DOM, DILL 2017 DOM

Ensure that support to IAMIS is Field checking conducted by RBOs, WRAs 2017 – RBOs, WRAs
coordinated with support to RBOs/WRAs with the support of third 2021
MOHA and MOA information party (university, consultant)
systems
# national/subnational staff trained in
IAMIS
Results area 3: Irrigation infrastructure
improved
Where technically, economically and Conduct pilot schemes for 2016: Assessment (technical, RBOs, DILL 2017 on RBOs
institutionally feasible, irrigation canals hydropower generation financial and institutional)
need to be equipped with hydropower methodology developed
turbines 2017: Screening for eligible pilot
conducted
2018: Pilot implemented
2019: Pilot implemented
Environment
Screening and criteria for categorization Update the MPWH guidance on Updated guidance in place including DGWR in 2017 DGWR
(AMDAL/UPL/UKL/SPPL) from the categorizing irrigation check list and disseminated consultation with
Minister of Public Work regulation 10/2008 rehabilitation projects to MOEF
needs improvement on the definition of UKL/UPL or SPPL. The
impacts for rehabilitation of irrigation regulation will include (i) negative Environment screening included in DGWR 2017 DGWR
system.c checklist to ensure exclusion of the SETIP template and guidance
environmentally critical projects,
No or limited screening for irrigation and (ii) EMP and monitoring

c Government regulation No. 27/2012 describes the mandate for each sector to develop or revise a technical regulation.
32

N Key gap Proposed Action Indicator Responsibility Time frame Budget source
projects budgeted by provinces/districts requirements and format DGWR, MOHA 2017: 30%, DGWR, MOHA
WRA staff trained on environment 2018: 100%
Environmental impacts not fully assessed Disseminate the updated requirements (e.g. MOEF No.
by district governments due to limited regulation/guidance and provide 05/2012), MPWH regulation, and on
experience training to RBOs and WRAs staff existing procedures and preparation
on environment requirements for of environment documents
irrigation rehabilitation including RBOs, WRAs 2017– 2020 RBOs, WRAs
screening, preparation of Updated EMP and monitoring
AMDAL, UPL/UKL, SPPL and requirements
EMP DGWR 2017 DGWR
Developed and implemented full
Integrate the screening and RKL/RPL as per regulation
categorization of impacts into the requirement
Social, Economic, Technical and
Institutional Profile (SETIP) RBOs, WRAs 2017 - 2021 RBOs, WRAs

Integrate EMP and monitoring

requirements into the technical
specifications as per of the
contract for work

Develop and implement full

RKL/RPL for each proposed
subprojects if needed
Engineering design do not consider Integrate environmental aspects, MPWH design standard guidelines for DGWR 2017 DGWR
climate change variability ecological engineering for irrigation updated
infrastructure, climate resilient
infrastructure into MPWH design RBOs and WRAs staff briefed and DGWR 2017 DGWR
standard guidelines for irrigation trained on updated MPWH design
(KP) standard guidelines for irrigation
rehabilitation
Disseminate MPWH design
standard guidelines for irrigation
to WRAs
Involuntary Resettlement and
Negotiated land Acquisition
Livelihood restoration programs are For land acquisition using Law Guidance on land acquisition and RBOs, WRAs 2017 – RBOs, WRAs
provided for projects financed by 2/2012 procedure (land to be resettlement include identification of 2020
multilateral agencies and state owned acquired more than 5 hectares) vulnerable and severely AHs and
enterprises, and none for local (i) Strengthen the delivery of social action plan delivered to these
government projects ; physically and social/livelihood program groups
economically displaced persons are not for entitled parties
provided with transitional support and considered vulnerable and Compensation for emotional loss
33

N Key gap Proposed Action Indicator Responsibility Time frame Budget source
development assistance severely affected personsd. Solatiume provided to cover
The program can be transitional allowance and
covered by local depreciation of affected building
government program
(ii) Clarify and agree for MOU between agencies on
physical relocation to arrangement and implementation of
include transitional SAP prepared
allowance
(iii) advise APs in using cash Consultation with host communities
compensation wisely conducted if resettlement option is
taken for compensationf.

Included in M&E system and

reporting
Compensation provided for affected For Non-Land Right Holders Compensation at replacement and RBOs, WRAs 2017 – RBOs, WRAs
assets owned by non-land rights holders (squatters) Improve assistance delivered as per 2020
are varying, from providing with uang compensation and its delivery for regulationsg or exclusion of sub
kerohiman and no compensation at all non- land assets at replacement projects with significant impact from
cost along the irrigation channel the program
Right of way management needs to be Protect and manage ROW to ROW protection and management DGWR 2017 DGWR
improved, however this is constrained by prevent return of affected included in official detailed
poor condition of physical delineation persons and new encroachers engineering design guidelines
along irrigation canals
Legalize land assets ROW management plans developed RBOs, WRAs 2017 – RBOs, WRAs
Weak monitoring and protection of ROW as part of the O&M plans 2020
along rehabilitated canals that encourage Improve delineation along
encroachment and squatters irrigation canals DGWR’s land assets legalized

2016: Screening of irrigation

d
Vulnerable groups are people who might suffer more or face the risk of being further marginalized due to the project and specifically include:(i) households that are
headed by women, (ii) household heads with disabilities, (iii) households falling under the regional poverty line, and iv) elderly household heads. Severely affected
persons refer to the affected/ displaced Persons who will (i) lose 10% or more of their total productive assets, ii) have to relocate, and/or (iii) lose 10% or more of
their total income sources due to the project.
e
The 2013 Indonesia Valuation Standard (Standar Penilaian Indonesia) of MAPPI indicates that the solatium will be ranging 10% - 30& of the total affected assets
rate depending on the people’s attachment to the assets.
f Land acquisition law No. 2 of 2012 , Article 36 describes on options for compensation including; (i) cash; (ii) land replacement; (iii) resettlement; (iv) shareholding;
or (v) other forms as agreed upon by both parties. The elucidation of article 36 stipulates that resettlement means a process of replacing the entitled parties’ land
with the land of different location as agreed during the process of land acquisition.
g
The law and regulations include KUH Perdata, Law No. 39 of 1999on Human Rights, article 29 stating that every person is entitled of protection of their property
rights. Article 36 stipulates that property rights can not be taken without due process and against the law.
Agencies to (i) hire an appraiser; or (ii) refer to official appraiser guidance (SP306); or (iii) local governments to provide social support; or (iv) coordinate with
contractor; or (v) end of lease agreement
34

N Key gap Proposed Action Indicator Responsibility Time frame Budget source
schemes, 2017: Xxx km, 2018: Xxx
km, 2019: Xxx km, 2020: Xxx km,
2021: Xxx km of irrigation canals
have physical delineation
Institutional Capacity for social and
environment safeguards
Insufficient organizational capacities and Establish and/or strengthen Generic TOR for environment and DGWR 2017 DGWR
human resources of agencies for social dedicated units for both social safeguards units developed
and environment safeguards environment and social
safeguards in RBOs and WRAs Dedicated units in RBOs and WRAs RBOs, WRAs 2017 – RBOs, WRAs
including generic terms of for both environment and social 2020
reference safeguards established (2017: 5%,
2018: 20%, 2019: 50%, 2020: 75%,
Assign and train focal persons 2021: 100%)
for social and environment
safeguards in RBOs and WRAs Focal persons for social and RBOs, WRAs 2017 – RBOs, WRAs
environment safeguards assigned 2020
Hire safeguards expert to ensure and trained
the smooth implementation of the
program Safeguards specialists is hired DGWR 2017 DGWR

Training orientation across levels Trained staff across levels

(executing and implementing DGWR 2017 DGWR
agencies and participating
agencies) on Country Systems
with key concerns for
environment, involuntary
resettlement and indigenous
peoples, safeguards and PSSA
Action plan

Awareness raising and capacity

development for WRAs to assure
that the EMP implementation is
carried out. [Link] is
used as basis for monitoring/
reporting of compliance to
environmental regulations.
Grievance redress mechanisms (GRM) Develop guidance for GRM with Guidance for GRM developed or DGWR, MOHA 2017 DGWR, MOHA
lack of standard timeline clear role and responsibility and upgraded
timeline covering social,
GRM institutionalization not optimal environment and other issues Functioning communication platform RBOs, WRAs, 2017 – RBOs, WRAs,
for GRM BAPPEDAs 2019 BAPPEDAs
35

N Key gap Proposed Action Indicator Responsibility Time frame Budget source
Ensure that GRM are made
available through various ways Trained public relation units staff in RBOs, WRAs, 2017 – RBOs, WRAs,
(phone lines, websites, RBOs and WRAs to handle BAPPEDAs 2019 BAPPEDAs
newspaper, radio) complaints

Strengthen public relation units in Registry system for complaints RBOs, WRAs, 2017 – RBOs, WRAs,
RBOs and WRAs to handle established BAPPEDAs 2019 BAPPEDAs
complaints

Public announcement within 7

days after receiving complaint
Reporting and Monitoring on
environment
Public disclosure
For environmental assessment Socialize the requirements of the MOE regulation 17/2012 DGWR, MOHA 2017 DGWR, MOHA
documents of irrigation projects at the MOE regulation 17/2012 on requirements socialized to RBO, in coordination
district level, there is no public disclosure public disclosure of environment WRAs and BAPPEDAs with MOEF
of the findings documents

Local governments follow law Adopt the official MOEF online Environment report uploaded into the RBOs, WRAs 2017 – RBOs, WRAs
requirements, but interested parties system ([Link]) for official MOEF online system (DADU- 2021
sometimes not invited to consultations public disclosure [Link]) 2017: 5%, 2018: 20%,
2019: 50%, 2020: 75%, 2021: 100%)
Program impact and actions related to Prepare a standard format and Standard format and guidance for DGWR, MOHA, 2017 DGWR, MOHA,
land clearing and/or vulnerable groups guidance for reporting on reporting on impacts and actions MOA MOA
are not documented and disclosed to impacts and actions related to related to land clearing and/or
beneficiaries land clearing and/or vulnerable vulnerable groups developed (with
groups (with disaggregated data disaggregated data on vulnerability)
on vulnerability) and post LAR and post LAR
Lack of regular and continual supervision
and monitoring for post land acquisition Brief RBOs and WRAs staff on RBOs and WRAs staff briefed and DGWR, MOHA, 2017 – DGWR, MOHA,
and resettlement (LAR) the reporting requirements for trained on reporting requirements for MOA 2018 MOA
land clearing and/or vulnerable land clearing and/or vulnerable
groups groups and post LAR

Ensure preparation and Reports for land clearing and/or RBOs, WRAs 2017 – RBOs, WRAs
disclosure of reports for land vulnerable groups prepared and 2018
clearing and/or vulnerable disclosed
groups

Monitor the resettlement

outcomes and their impacts on
the living standards of displaced
36

N Key gap Proposed Action Indicator Responsibility Time frame Budget source
person (if any) through reviewing
complaints received and
conducting consultation with
community, and take necessary
actions of impacts are found to
affect the livelihood status of
affected persons
Annual reporting Annual monitoring on program Annual environment and social DGWR 2017 – DGWR
action plan implementation safeguards monitoring reports 2021
including any complaint handling submitted to ADB
is compiled by DGWR and
submitted to ADB
Others
Procurement
The procurement profile and data Updating of the current e- Improved use of SiRUP and MPWH, MOHA, 2017 MPWH, MOHA,
information is not consistently stored in procurement and e-monitoring procurement reporting as part of Bappenas, Local Bappenas, Local
the SPSE preventing reliable procurement system by each implementing regular e- monitoring system Governments Governments
monitoring agencies along with their
reporting in the system.
Potential procurement delays with no Improvement of procurement Procurement packages entered into MPWH, MOHA, 2017 MPWH, MOHA,
advance procurement actions planning, and ensure that all SIRUP and linked with budget Bappenas, Local Bappenas, Local
procurement packages (including document Governments Governments
those below the threshold for e-
procurement) are entered in the
SiRUP, and that the SiRUP links
with the budget document.
Limited competition and barrier for entry Increase competition measured Average number of qualified bidders MPWH 2019 MPWH
as the number technically is more than 3 by the end of RBL
compliant bids for civil works period
contracts through better
procurement planning and
capability development of local
contractors to meet requirements
of the bidding documents. Better
procurement planning shall
include aggregation of
requirements and avoid bidding
out all contracts simultaneously.
Conduct procurement/probity Procurement/probity audit is MPWH 2017 MPWH
audits of 3-5 procuring entities conducted
yearly.
The ToR for the selection of consultants All ToRs shall be shared and ToR are reviewed by ADB MPWH, MOHA, 2017 MPWH, MOHA,
does not provide incentives for quality discussed with ADB prior to BAPPENAS BAPPENAS
37

N Key gap Proposed Action Indicator Responsibility Time frame Budget source
aspects and it is restricted preventing tendering
consultants proposing high quality
proposals
Non compliance in the selection of Procurement audit of all The procurement audit is conducted MPWH 2017 ADB
consultants and ensuring that all prior consulting contracts after one
concerns have been addressed and year of effectiveness of the RBL.
performed consistently throughout the The procurement audit is carried
process of selection of consultants with out by the appropriate institution
regard to: in Indonesia. ADB will during
- improved and agreed RFP is used review missions verify the
- LPSE system is improved to allow outcome of the procurement
international competition for the selection audit. The Government will take
of consultants appropriate steps to address any
findings as required under
Indonesian law. The audit report,
its findings and the actions taking
by the Government in response
to any findings shall be shared
with ADB as soon as possible.
The selection of consultants is mostly A Value-For-Money audit of the The value for money audit is MPWH 2018 ADB
driven by the cost factor compromising the consulting services shall be performed
quality aspects carried out in the last year of the
RBL by an independent firm. The
results shall be shared with ADB
as soon as possible.
Fiduciary
Limited resources for financial Hire a financial management Terms of references developed and DGWR 2017 DGWR
management specialist to support the agreed Consultant mobilized
preparation of interim Financial
reports on a quarterly basis
Lack of consolidated information on the To prepare consolidated Submission of financial report on the DGWR and LG 2017 on
program related expenditures, at the unaudited program financial program from national level and local
national and local government level statement covering all source of government level
fund on incremental basis
Conduct training on financial Training program developed MOF 2017 on DGWR
management training for the Training conducted and evaluated
central and LG staff to prepare
financial reports on the program Manual developed and disseminated
by government
Inconsistency in the monitoring system Enhance/strengthen the use of e- E-mon upgraded and standardized DGWR 2017 DGWR
impede the process of consolidating data mon at central and local
at the central and local government government to capture the
information on financial and
38

N Key gap Proposed Action Indicator Responsibility Time frame Budget source
physical reports by using a
standard measurement (i.e. ha or
km, etc) to enable the
government to monitor the
achievement of the program in
terms of financial and physical
achievement.
Gender mainstreaming
Key actions to improve (i) Gender audit of guidelines DGWR, DWRI, 2017 DGWR
gender mainstreaming: (i) conducted MOHA, MOA, onward
conduct gender audits of all (ii) gender mainstreaming RBOs, and
guidelines; (ii) include gender integrated in the SETIP and into WRAs
mainstreaming in the SETIP the irrigated agriculture
and integrate findings into the management plan
irrigated agriculture (iii) 30% quota for women farmers
management plan to ensure representation in WUA executive
women smallholders’ committees
interests related to location, (iv) 20% target for women’s
alignment, and access to participation in the planning and
irrigation infrastructure are design of local irrigation
addressed and their access infrastructure investments
to commercial crops and
access to value chain
services for enhancing
productivity and
diversification of produce are
improved; and (iii) encourage
the participation and
monitoring of (a) a 30% quota
for women farmers
representation in WUA
executive committees, and
(b) a 20% target for women’s
participation in the planning
and design of local irrigation
infrastructure investments.
39

VII. MONITORING OF KEY PROGRAM COVENANTS

VIII. SUMMARY OF KEY OUTSTANDING ISSUES

63. The key outstanding issues and actions during program implementation and corrective
actions taken will be summarized in Appendix 11.

IX. ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM

64. The Accountability Mechanism provides an independent forum and process whereby
people adversely affected by ADB-assisted operations can voice and seek a resolution of their
problems, as well as report alleged violations of ADB’s operational policies and procedures.27
Thus, in addition to the steps taken to address social and environmental issues under the
program, people who are, or may in the future be, adversely affected by a program supported
by RBL may submit complaints to ADB’s Accountability Mechanism (2012).

65. Before submitting a complaint to the Accountability Mechanism, affected people should
make a good-faith effort to resolve their problems and/or issues by working with the concerned
ADB operations department. Only after doing that, and if they are still dissatisfied, should they
approach the Accountability Mechanism.

X. CHANGES IN PROGRAM SCOPE AND IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS

66. Changes in scope and implementation arrangement during the course of implementation
(including both major and minor changes) will be recorded in Appendix 12 to provide a
chronological history of these changes.

27 ADB. 2012. Review of the Accountability Mechanism Policy. Manila.

40

XI. PROGRAM ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND FOCAL STAFF

A. Organizational Structure
Ministry of
ADB
Finance

BAPPENAS
(National Steering
Committee)
Secretary

National MPWH-DGWR
Level (Executing Agency)

Secretary

DILL, DGWR DOM, DGWR MoHA MoA (IFAD

(Implementing (Implementing (Implementing
Executing Agency)
Agency) Agency) Agency)

BAPPEDA

Province
Level
RBO

WRA BAPPEDA ( Agr. Agency

BAPPEDA

District Level

WRA BAPPEDA Agr. Agency

Note:
: Command Line
: Coordination Line

ADB = Asian Development Bank, BAPPEDA = Provincial level Development Planning Agency, BAPPENAS = National Planning Agency, DGWR = Directorate General
of Water Resources, DILL = Directorate of Irrigation and Low Land, DOM = Directorate of Operation and Maintenance, IFAD = International Fund for Agricultural
Development, MOA = Ministry of Agriculture, MOHA = Ministry of Home Affairs, MPWH = Ministry of Public Works and Highways, RBO = river basin organization,
WRA = water resource agency.
41

B. Program Officers and Focal Persons

1. Initial Arrangements

Table 7: Program Officers and Focal Persons

(As of February 2017)

Nr Key Government Staff & Positions Key ADB Staff & Positions
I BAPPENAS Southeast Asia Department, Environment
Natural Resources and Agriculture Division
1.1 Director of Water and Irrigation – BAPPENAS Jiangfeng Zhang, Director, SEER
1.2 Juari (Staff of Directorate of Water and Eric Quincieu, Water Resources Specialist,
Irrigation – BAPPENAS) SEER
II DGWR Country Director
2.1 Directorate General of Water Resources Said Zaidansyah, Senior Counsel, Office of
the General Counsel
2.1.1 Imam Santoso (Director General Water
Resources of Public Works & Housing
Ministry)
2.2 Directorate of Development Networking of
Water Resources
2.2.1 Trisasongko Widianto (Director of
Development Networking of Water
Resources)
2.2.2 Heru Setiawan, ST, [Link] (Head of Sub-
Director of Coorporation - Directorate of
Development Networking of Water
Resources)
2.3 Directorate of Irrigation & Lowland
2.3.1 Ir. Adang Saf Ahmad, CES (Director of
Irrigation & Lowland)
2.3.2 Muradi, (Head of Sub-Director of Technical
Guidance – Directorate of Irrigation &
Lowland)
2.4 Directorate of Operation & Maintenance
Building
2.4.1 (Director of Operation & Maintenance
Building)
2.4.2 Muhammad Asdin Thalib (Head of Sub-
Director of Operation & Maintenance
Planning – Directorate of Operation &
Maintenance Building)
III MOHA
3.1 Synchronization of Local Government Affairs
I
3.1.1 Drs. Nyoto Suwignyo, MM (Director of
Synchronization of Local Government Affairs
I)
3.1.2 Ir. Edi Siagian, ME (Head of Sub-Director of
Agriculture and Food – Directorate of
Synchronization of Local Government Affairs
I)
3.1.3 Gunawan Eko Movianto, SE. MM (Section
Chief Regional I – Sub-Diretorate of
Agriculture and Food – Directorate of
42

Nr Key Government Staff & Positions Key ADB Staff & Positions
Synchronization of Local Government Affairs
I)

2. Changes during Implementation

67. Appendix 13 records the changes of ADB mission leader and key EA staff during
program implementation.
Appendix 1 43

Appendix 1: RBL Program Results Framework

(As of February 2017)

Results DLI (Yes/ Baseline Target Values of Results Indicators

Indicators No) Baseline Value Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Outcome: Sustainable and more productive irrigated agriculture in 74 Districtsa
By 2021, Yes/ DLI 1 The 2016 Baseline data Annual report Performance for Performance
performance of performance updated and on performance 826 irrigation for 826
irrigation systems index for reported for all by scheme schemes in irrigation
in the program national schemes in 74 submitted from program area schemes in
area improved by schemes in the districts all participating improved by at program area
at least 15% from program area agencies at least 10% from improved by at
baseline levelb was 60. national, 2017 baseline least 15% from
provincial and value 2017 baseline
No baseline for district levels value
subnational
schemes

Reporting
system non-
functional in
some districts
By 2021, at least No 4 RP2Is 2016 At least 50%
50% Irrigation incorporated RP2Is
Development into five-year incorporated
Management district, into five-year
Plans or Rencana province, and district,

a
This includes the following districts: Aceh Besar, Aceh Utara, Aceh Timur, Bireun (Aceh province); Tapanuli Tengah, Asahan, Humbang Hasundutan, Simalungun
(North Sumatra province); Sinjunjung, Pasaman, Limapuluh Koto, Pasaman Barat, Pesisir Selatan (West Sumatra province); Musi Rawas, Empat Lawang, Ogan
Komering Ulu Selatan, Muara Enim, Musi Banyuasin, Banyuasin, Lahat (South Sumatra province); Pesawaran, Tanggamus, Lampung Tengah, Tulangbawang,
Mesuji (Lampung province); Serang, Pandeglang (Banten province); Garut, Indramayu, Kuningan, Ciamis, Sukabumi, Majalengka, Sumedang (West Java
province); Kebumen, Banjarnegara, Purworejo, Pekalongan, Pati, Banyumas, Cilacap (Central Java province); Bojonegoro,Ngawi, Lamongan, Kediri, Madiun,
Lumajang, Jember, Jombang, Tuban (East Java province); Ketapang, Kubu Raya, Sambas, Kayong Utara (West Kalimantan province); Hulu Sungai Tengah, Tapin,
Barito Kuala, Tanah Bumbu (South Kalimantan province); Minahasa Selatan, Bolaang Mongondow (North Sulawesi province); Toli Toli, Poso, Banggai (Central
Sulawesi province); Wajo, Pinrang, Sidenreng Rappang, Soppeng, Bone (South Sulawesi province); Lombok Tengah, Lombok Timur, Bima, Dompu (Nusa
Tenggara Barat province); Manggarai Barat, Manggarai Timur (Nusa Tenggara Timur province). The government selected the target areas carefully, based on the
need to improve irrigated agriculture.
b
The irrigation performance index or Indek Kinerja Sistem Irigasi (IKSI) is calculated based on 6 criteria, with a possible total score of 100 as stipulated in the Ministry
of Public Works and Housing regulation 12/2015. The 6 criteria are measured and weighted for every irrigation scheme as follows: (i) functioning infrastructure
(45%); (ii) agriculture productivity (15%); (iii) supporting facilities for operations and maintenance (O&M) (10%); (iv) adequacy of human resources for O&M (15%);
(v) adequacy of data and information (5%); and (vi) water user association participation (10%). Achievement of DLI 1 requires achieving outputs as well as
strengthening the IKSI system so that baselines can be set. DLI 1 will cover irrigation schemes of more than 400 ha and 10 irrigation schemes with an area of less
than 200 ha included in the selected 74 districts.
44 Appendix 1

Results DLI (Yes/ Baseline Target Values of Results Indicators

Indicators No) Baseline Value Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Pengembangan national plans province, and
dan Pengelolaan and budgets national plans
Irrigasi (RP2I) and budgets
incorporated into
five-year district,
province and
national plans and
budgetsc
Budget for O&M of No O&M funding for 2016 Arrangements to Baseline data At least 40% of At least 70% of
irrigation central schemes collect baseline and collected and budget needs for budget needs
infrastructure is monitored by annual data for reported for all O&M of irrigation for O&M of
allocated as per DGWR subnational irrigation schemes in 74 is allocated as irrigation is
needs schemes districts per RP2I allocated as
O&M funding for established in 74 per RP2I
subnational districts
schemes is
monitored by
MOHA
Results area 1: Systems and institutional capacity for sustainable irrigated agriculture strengthened
Planning and Yes/ DLI 2 Government 2016 5 guidelines 1 guideline 1 guideline
Engineering guidelines or updatedd, of which 3 updatede and 2 officially issued
Guidelines for regulations on guidelines officially guidelines and
Irrigation delivery issued and officially issued disseminated f
Delivery systems systems need disseminated and disseminated
for irrigated adjustment and
agriculture refinement

c
The district or provincial parliament approves the aggregated IAMP with appropriate allocations from the district/province budget so that the aggregated IAMP
becomes part of the five-year development plan and budget for that district or province. The aggregated IAMP is to be updated every year. Based on the Ministry of
Public Works and Housing Regulation 12/2015 and 30/2015.
d
Updated guidelines: (i) detailed engineering guidelines to incorporate adaptation for irrigation system management to increasing climate variability and change,
climate proofing, water efficiency, mapping, and remote sensing; master planning and feasibility study methodology, construction management and technical
specification and cost estimate standards; right of way management; hydro-mechanical works; (ii) participatory irrigation management or Pengembangan dan
Pengelolaan Sistem Irigasi Partisipatip (PPISP) guidelines for WUAs and farmers empowerment; (iii) guidelines for PROM, (iv) Social, Economic, Technical and
Institutional Profile (SETIP) guidelines; (v) IAMP guidelines. Officially issued: (i) Social, Economic, Technical and Institutional Profile (SETIP) guidelines; (ii) IAMP
guidelines; (iii) guidelines for PROM.
e
Updated guidelines: (i) decree for key performance indicators for RBOs and WRAs. Officially issued: (i) detailed engineering guidelines to incorporate adaptation for
irrigation system management to increasing climate variability and change, climate proofing, water efficiency, mapping, and remote sensing; master planning and
feasibility study methodology, construction management and technical specification and cost estimate standards; right of way management; hydro-mechanical
works; (ii) participatory irrigation management or Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan Sistem Irigasi Partisipatip (PPISP) guidelines for WUAs and farmers
empowerment.
f Officially issued: (i) decree for key performance indicators for RBOs and WRAs.
Appendix 1 45

Results DLI (Yes/ Baseline Target Values of Results Indicators

Indicators No) Baseline Value Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
management
improved by 2019
National No No National 2016 Modules jointly Competency Irrigation field The competency
Competency Competency prepared by DGWR, certification facilitators certification
Certification Certification MOA and MOHA system officialized certified by system is
System for System for by DGWR DGWR evaluated
irrigation planning, irrigation field Program irrigation nationally
financial facilitators field facilitators
management and certified by DGWR
participatory
management
established and
operationalg
5 irrigation No No IMU 2016 IMU concept 2 IMUs 3 IMUs 5 IMUs 5 IMUs
management units developed and established in established and established and functioning in
(IMU) established endorsed by DGWR selected schemes 2 IMUs 4 IMUs in selected
and functioning for IMU concept and budget functioning in selected schemes and
selected irrigation socialized and allocated selected schemes and budget
schemes by 2021 arrangements schemes and budget allocated allocated
established for budget
selected schemes allocated
Irrigation Yes/ DLI 3 No updated 2016 Irrigation At least 45 district At least 55 At least 65 At least 88
Commission performance commission or province district or district or district or
operationalized to criteria for performance irrigation province province province
enhance assessing indicators updated i omissions are irrigation irrigation irrigation
institutional institutional assessed as commissions commissions are commissions
capacity for capacity operationalized are assessed as assessed as are assessed
integration and based on the operationalized operationalized as
coordination of 31 updated based on the based on the operationalized
agriculture and operationalized performance updated updated based on the
infrastructure irrigation indicators. performance performance updated
development commissions indicators indicators performance
strengthened in 74 indicators.
districts and 14
provinces by 2021h

g
Establishing and operationalizing the National Competency Certification System has the following steps: (i) modules to be prepared in collaboration with the
National Body for Professional Certification (BNSP); (ii) the Competency Certification System to be legally recognized by DGWR; (iii) an operational certification
process for irrigated agriculture facilitators; and (iv) by 2021, at least xx% of irrigation facilitators are certified.
h
Strengthening institutional capacity for integration and coordination of agriculture and infrastructure development requires three steps: (i) Irrigation Commission
performance indicators are updated; (ii) Irrigation Commissions meet the minimum score to be considered as operational; and (iii) the Irrigation Commission’s
performance is assessed against updated indicators in all target provinces and districts.
46 Appendix 1

Results DLI (Yes/ Baseline Target Values of Results Indicators

Indicators No) Baseline Value Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
At least 74 District Yes/ DLI 4 6 RP2Is 2016 12 RP2Is 50 RP2Is 74 RP2Is
Irrigation endorsed in endorsed by endorsed by endorsed by
Development 2015 by District district heads district heads district heads
Management Head for
Plans (RP2I) incorporation
endorsed by into five-year
district headj district plans
and budgets
Results area 2: Irrigation operation and maintenance, and management improved
Irrigation asset Yes/ DLI 5 The irrigation 2016 IAMIS software has IAMIS has IAMIS has IAMIS has IAMIS has
management asset been upgraded to a updated data and updated data updated data updated data
improved for 2.5 management web-based maps on at least and maps on at and maps on at and maps on at
million hectares of information geospatial system. 0.6 million least 1.2 million least 1.8 million least 2.5 million
irrigation systems system (IAMIS) hectares of hectares of hectares of hectares of
by 2021k software is Guidelines for field irrigation systems, irrigation irrigation irrigation
outdated and verification based on systems based systems based systems based
cannot be used developed and validated surveys on validated on validated on validated
for planning and approved and other existing surveys and surveys and surveys and
managing data. other existing other existing other existing
irrigation Existing dataset on data. data data
systems. nationwide irrigation
systems migrated to
Only 20% of upgraded IAMIS
national
schemes assets
are registered.
Effective Yes/ DLI 6 No WUAs 2016 WUA performance The number of The number of The number of
management of operationalized indicators updated m WUAs WUAs WUAs
tertiary irrigation yet operationalized by operationalized operationalized
systems through Baseline survey the program is at by the program by the program
operationalizing at conducted least 3,000 is at least 4,000 is at least 4,500
least 4,500 Water

i
The irrigation commission performance composite index includes: (i) establishment and legal status; (ii) staffing, job description, coordination and implementation of
the work plan, documentations/reports and facilities; and (iii) annual operational budget
j
The RP2I, prepared with a needs-based budget, is endorsed by the head of district, a necessary step for the regional parliament’s approval for incorporation into
five-year sector plans and budgets.
k
Improved irrigation asset management means: (i) irrigation asset management information system (IAMIS) software upgraded; (ii) existing dataset on irrigation
systems migrated to upgraded IAMIS; (iii) surveys and remote sensing conducted on irrigation assets; (iv) survey data validated and entered into geospatial
information systems; and (v) staff trained and appointed to use the IAMIS effectively.
Appendix 1 47

Results DLI (Yes/ Baseline Target Values of Results Indicators

Indicators No) Baseline Value Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
User Associations
(WUAs) by 2021l
Share of women in No <10% 2016 >10% >12% > 15% >17% >20%
the governing
boards of WUAs
increased to at
least 20% by 2021
Improved Yes/ DLI 7 No Social, 2016 SETIP/PSETK At least 500 At least 719
assessments Economic guidelines updated SETIPs/ PSETK SETIPs/PSETK
integrating Technical and to integrate planning completed in line completed in
agriculture and Institutional and development of with the expanded line with the
infrastructure Profile (SETIP/ agriculture and requirements for expanded
development PSETK) in line infrastructure At integrated requirements for
conducted for at with expanded least 50 planning and integrated
least 719 priority guidelineso SETIPs/PSETK development of planning and
schemes by 2021n completed in line agriculture and development of
with the expanded infrastructure agriculture and
requirements for infrastructure
integrated planning
and development of
agriculture and
infrastructure
Results area 3: Irrigation infrastructure improved
Water resources No No additional 2016 Water resources Water resources Water
accounting using schemes accounting using accounting using resources
satellite technology satellite technology satellite accounting
for additional for 10% additional technology for using satellite
schemes of more schemes completed 50% additional technology for
than 200 ha schemes validated 100% additional
completed and schemes
validated by 2017 validated
Detailed No 45,000 ha 2016 250,000 ha 500,000 ha 800,000 ha
Engineering
Designs prepared

m
The WUA performance composite index includes: (i) establishment and legal status; (ii) operation of irrigation infrastructure and water allocation, (iii) management of
tertiary canals and associated infrastructure.
l
A given WUA is considered operationalized as per performance evaluation in line with updated guidelines.
n
Improved assessments integrating agriculture and infrastructure development mean (i) Social, Economic, Technical and Institutional Profile (SETIP) is prepared for
the irrigation scheme, and (ii) the assessment is conducted in line with the expanded requirements for integrated planning and development of agriculture and
infrastructure.
o 763 irrigation schemes have completed SETIPs prepared in line with the current guidelines.
48 Appendix 1

Results DLI (Yes/ Baseline Target Values of Results Indicators

Indicators No) Baseline Value Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
in line with DGWR
technical
standards
completed for at
least 800,000
hectares in the
program area by
2020
Rehabilitated Yes/ DLI 8 Zero hectare of 2016 At least 45,000 At least 145,000 At least 300,000 At least 400,000 At least
irrigation rehabilitated or hectares of hectares of hectares of hectares of 500,000
infrastructure in upgraded irrigation irrigation irrigation irrigation hectares of
program areas irrigation infrastructure infrastructure infrastructure infrastructure irrigation
increased by infrastructure as rehabilitated or rehabilitated or rehabilitated or rehabilitated or infrastructure
500,000 ha by per MPWH upgraded as per upgraded as per upgraded as per upgraded as per rehabilitated or
2021p technical MPWH technical MPWH technical MPWH MPWH technical upgraded as
standards standards standards technical standards per MPWH
standards technical
standards
At least 5 irrigation No 0 schemes 2016 Modernization Modernization Modernization
schemes initiated guidelines assessment process initiated
modernized completed and completed for 5 for 5 irrigation
according to officially endorsed irrigation schemes scheme
Government by DGWR modernized
technical Modernization according to
standards by assessment Government
2021q completed for 2 technical
irrigation schemes standards
Hydropower No 0 2016 Assessment Screening for Pilot
generation (technical, financial eligible pilot implemented in
capacity developed and institutional) conducted 10 schemes
in selected methodology
schemes by 2019 developed

p
Rehabilitated and upgraded infrastructure as per MPWH guidelines. The target excludes category A (involuntary resettlement, environment and indigenous people)
interventions.
For irrigation schemes that are crossing 2 districts – with one of them not a participating district – the downstream area hydraulically connected to the rehabilitated
infrastructure will be accounted as functioning.
q
An irrigation scheme has been modernized when: (i) the rapid assessment has been completed as per modernization guidelines; (ii) recommendations have been
incorporated in the work plan; and (iii) priority recommendations (those within the project life cycle) have been implemented. Modernization preparations include
selection of the irrigation scheme on the basis of: (i) completed SETIP; (ii) completed Water Resources Diagnostic; (iii) well-functioning WUA; and (iv) institutional
preparedness.
Appendix 1 49

DGWR = Directorate General of Water Resources, DLI = disbursement-linked indicator, IAMIS = Irrigation Asset Management Information System, IAMP = Irrigated
Agriculture Management Plan, IMU = irrigation management unit, O&M = operation and maintenance, MOA = Ministry of Agriculture, MOHA = Ministry of Home
Affairs, RP2I = Irrigation Development Management Plan (Rencana Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan Irigasi), SETIP = Social, Economic, Technical and Institutional
Profile , WUA = water user association.
50 Appendix 2

Appendix 2: Status of the Results Framework

(As XXXX)

Target Value Actual Achievement

Results Indicators Baseline Value Baseline Year {Year} {Year}
Outcome
1.
2.
Outputs
3.
4.
Other Results
5.
6.
Appendix 3 51

Appendix 3: Disbursement-Linked Indicators

(as of February 2017)

Results DLI (Yes/ Baseline Target Values of Results Indicators

Indicators No) Baseline Value Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Outcome: Sustainable and more productive irrigated agriculture in 74 Districtsa
By 2021, Yes/ The 2016 Baseline data Annual report Performance Performance
performance of DLI 1 performance updated and on for 826 for 826
irrigation systems index for reported for performance irrigation irrigation
in the program national all schemes in by scheme schemes in schemes in
area improved by schemes in the 74 districts submitted program area program area
at least 15% from program area from all improved by at improved by at
baseline levelb was 60. participating least 10% least 15% from
agencies at from 2017 2017 baseline
No baseline for national, baseline value value
subnational provincial
schemes and district
levels
Reporting
system non-
functional in
some districts
Results area 1: Systems and institutional capacity for sustainable irrigated agriculture strengthened
Planning and Yes/ Government 2016 1 guideline 1 guideline
Engineering DLI 2 guidelines or 5 guidelines updatedc, of updatedd and officially

a
This includes the following districts: Aceh Besar, Aceh Utara, Aceh Timur, Bireun (Aceh province); Tapanuli Tengah, Asahan, Humbang Hasundutan, Simalungun
(North Sumatra province); Sinjunjung, Pasaman, Limapuluh Koto, Pasaman Barat, Pesisir Selatan (West Sumatra province); Musi Rawas, Empat Lawang, Ogan
Komering Ulu Selatan, Muara Enim, Musi Banyuasin, Banyuasin, Lahat (South Sumatra province); Pesawaran, Tanggamus, Lampung Tengah, Tulangbawang,
Mesuji (Lampung province); Serang, Pandeglang (Banten province); Garut, Indramayu, Kuningan, Ciamis, Sukabumi, Majalengka, Sumedang (West Java
province); Kebumen, Banjarnegara, Purworejo, Pekalongan, Pati, Banyumas, Cilacap (Central Java province); Bojonegoro,Ngawi, Lamongan, Kediri, Madiun,
Lumajang, Jember, Jombang, Tuban (East Java province); Ketapang, Kubu Raya, Sambas, Kayong Utara (West Kalimantan province); Hulu Sungai Tengah, Tapin,
Barito Kuala, Tanah Bumbu (South Kalimantan province); Minahasa Selatan, Bolaang Mongondow (North Sulawesi province); Toli Toli, Poso, Banggai (Central
Sulawesi province); Wajo, Pinrang, Sidenreng Rappang, Soppeng, Bone (South Sulawesi province); Lombok Tengah, Lombok Timur, Bima, Dompu (Nusa
Tenggara Barat province); Manggarai Barat, Manggarai Timur (Nusa Tenggara Timur province). The government selected the target areas carefully, based on the
need to improve irrigated agriculture.
b
The irrigation performance index or Indek Kinerja Sistem Irigasi (IKSI) is calculated based on 6 criteria, with a possible total score of 100 as stipulated in the Ministry
of Public Works and Housing regulation 12/2015. The 6 criteria are measured and weighted for every irrigation scheme as follows: (i) functioning infrastructure
(45%); (ii) agriculture productivity (15%); (iii) supporting facilities for operations and maintenance (O&M) (10%); (iv) adequacy of human resources for O&M (15%);
(v) adequacy of data and information (5%); and (vi) water user association participation (10%). Achievement of DLI 1 requires achieving outputs as well as
strengthening the IKSI system so that baselines can be set. DLI 1 will cover irrigation schemes of more than 400 ha and 10 irrigation schemes with an area of less
than 200 ha included in the selected 74 districts.
c Updated guidelines: (i) detailed engineering guidelines to incorporate adaptation for irrigation system management to increasing climate variability and change,
52 Appendix 3

Results DLI (Yes/ Baseline Target Values of Results Indicators

Indicators No) Baseline Value Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Guidelines for regulations on which 3 guidelines officially 2 guidelines issued and
Irrigation delivery systems issued and disseminated officially disseminated e
Delivery systems need adjustment issued and
for irrigated and refinement disseminated
agriculture
management
improved by 2019
Irrigation Yes/ No updated 2016 At least 45 At least 55 At least 65 At least 88
Commission DLI 3 performance Irrigation commission district or district or district or district or
operationalized to criteria for performance indicators province province province province
enhance assessing updated g irrigation irrigation irrigation irrigation
institutional institutional omissions are commissions commissions commissions
capacity for capacity assessed as are assessed are assessed are assessed
integration and operationalize as as as
coordination of 31 d based on operationalize operationaliz operationalized
agriculture and operationalized the updated d based on the ed based on based on the
infrastructure irrigation performance updated the updated updated
development commissions indicators. performance performance performance
strengthened in 74 indicators indicators indicators.
districts and 14
provinces by 2021f
At least 74 District Yes/ 6 RP2Is 2016 12 RP2Is 50 RP2Is 74 RP2Is
Irrigation DLI 4 endorsed in endorsed by endorsed by endorsed by
Development 2015 by District district heads district heads district heads
Management Head for

climate proofing, water efficiency, mapping, and remote sensing; master planning and feasibility study methodology, construction management and technical
specification and cost estimate standards; right of way management; hydro-mechanical works; (ii) participatory irrigation management or Pengembangan dan
Pengelolaan Sistem Irigasi Partisipatip (PPISP) guidelines for WUAs and farmers empowerment; (iii) guidelines for PROM, (iv) Social, Economic, Technical and
Institutional Profile (SETIP) guidelines; (v) IAMP guidelines; Officially issued: (i) Social, Economic, Technical and Institutional Profile (SETIP) guidelines; (ii) IAMP
guidelines; (iii) guidelines for PROM.
d
Updated guidelines: (i) decree for key performance indicators for RBOs and WRAs. Officially issued: (i) detailed engineering guidelines to incorporate
adaptation for irrigation system management to increasing climate variability and change, climate proofing, water efficiency, mapping, and remote sensing; master
planning and feasibility study methodology, construction management and technical specification and cost estimate standards; right of way management; hydro-
mechanical works; (ii) participatory irrigation management or Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan Sistem Irigasi Partisipatip (PPISP) guidelines for WUAs and farmers
empowerment.
e
Officially issued: (i) decree for key performance indicators for RBOs and WRAs.
f
Strengthening institutional capacity for integration and coordination of agriculture and infrastructure development requires three steps: (i) Irrigation Commission
performance indicators are updated; (ii) Irrigation Commissions meet the minimum score to be considered as operational; and (iii) the Irrigation Commission’s
performance is assessed against updated indicators in all target provinces and districts.
g The irrigation commission performance composite index includes: (i) establishment and legal status; (ii) staffing, job description, coordination and implementation of
the work plan, documentations/reports and facilities; and (iii) annual operational budget.
Appendix 3 53

Results DLI (Yes/ Baseline Target Values of Results Indicators

Indicators No) Baseline Value Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Plans (RP2I) incorporation
endorsed by into five-year
district headh district plans and
budgets
Results area 2: Irrigation operation and maintenance, and management improved
Irrigation asset Yes/ The irrigation 2016 IAMIS software has been IAMIS has IAMIS has IAMIS has IAMIS has
management DLI 5 asset upgraded to a web-based updated data updated data updated data updated data
improved for 2.5 management geospatial system. and maps on and maps on and maps on and maps on at
million hectares of information at least 0.6 at least 1.2 at least 1.8 least 2.5 million
irrigation systems system (IAMIS) Guidelines for field million million million hectares of
by 2021i software is verification developed and hectares of hectares of hectares of irrigation
outdated and approved irrigation irrigation irrigation systems based
cannot be used systems, systems systems on validated
for planning and Existing dataset on based on based on based on surveys and
managing nationwide irrigation systems validated validated validated other existing
irrigation migrated to upgraded IAMIS surveys and surveys and surveys and data
systems. other existing other existing other existing
data. data. data
Only 20% of
national
schemes assets
are registered.
Effective Yes/ No WUAs 2016 WUA performance indicators The number The number The number of
management of DLI 6 operationalized updated k of WUAs of WUAs WUAs
tertiary irrigation yet operationalize operationaliz operationalize
systems through Baseline survey conducted d by the ed by the d by the
operationalizing at program is at program is at program is at
least 4,500 Water least 3,000 least 4,000 least 4,500
User Associations
(WUAs) by 2021j
Improved Yes/ No Social, 2016 SETIP/PSETK guidelines At least 500 At least 719
assessments DLI 7 Economic updated to integrate planning SETIPs SETIPs/PSE
integrating Technical and and development of /PSETK TK

h
The RP2I, prepared with a needs-based budget, is endorsed by the head of district, a necessary step for the regional parliament’s approval for incorporation into
five-year sector plans and budgets.
i
Improved irrigation asset management means: (i) irrigation asset management information system (IAMIS) software upgraded; (ii) existing dataset on irrigation
systems migrated to upgraded IAMIS; (iii) surveys and remote sensing conducted on irrigation assets; (iv) survey data validated and entered into geospatial
information systems; and (v) staff trained and appointed to use the IAMIS effectively.
j
A given WUA is considered operationalized as per performance evaluation in line with updated guidelines.
k The WUA performance composite index includes: (i) establishment and legal status; (ii) operation of irrigation infrastructure and water allocation, (iii) management
of tertiary canals and associated infrastructure.
54 Appendix 3

Results DLI (Yes/ Baseline Target Values of Results Indicators

Indicators No) Baseline Value Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
agriculture and Institutional agriculture and infrastructure completed in completed in
infrastructure Profile At least 50 SETIPs/PSETK line with the line with the
development (SETIP/PSETK) completed in line with the expanded expanded
conducted for at in line with expanded requirements for requirements requirements
least 719 priority expanded integrated planning and for integrated for integrated
schemes by 2021l guidelinesm development of agriculture planning and planning and
and infrastructure development development
of agriculture of agriculture
and and
infrastructure infrastructure
Results area 3: Irrigation infrastructure improved
Rehabilitated Yes/ Zero hectare of 2016 At least 45,000 hectares of At leastAt least At least At least
irrigation DLI 8 rehabilitated or irrigation infrastructure 145,000 300,000 400,000 500,000
infrastructure in upgraded rehabilitated or upgraded as hectares of
hectares of hectares of hectares of
program areas irrigation per MPWH technical irrigation
irrigation irrigation irrigation
increased by infrastructure as standards infrastructure
infrastructure infrastructure infrastructure
500,000 ha by per MPWH rehabilitated
rehabilitated rehabilitated or rehabilitated or
2021n technical or upgraded
or upgraded upgraded as upgraded as
standards as per MPWH
as per per MPWH per MPWH
technical
MPWH technical technical
standards
technical standards standards
standards
DGWR = Directorate General of Water Resources, DLI = disbursement-linked indicator, IAMIS = Irrigation Asset Management Information System, IAMP = Irrigated
Agriculture Management Plan, IMU = irrigation management unit, O&M = operation and maintenance, MOA = Ministry of Agriculture, MOHA = Ministry of Home
Affairs, RP2I = Irrigation Development Management Plan (Rencana Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan Irigasi), SETIP = Social, Economic, Technical and Institutional
Profile , WUA = water user association.

l
Improved assessments integrating agriculture and infrastructure development mean (i) Social, Economic, Technical and Institutional Profile (SETIP) is prepared for
the irrigation scheme, and (ii) the assessment is conducted in line with the expanded requirements for integrated planning and development of agriculture and
infrastructure.
m 763 irrigation schemes have completed SETIPs prepared in line with the current guidelines.
n Rehabilitated and upgraded infrastructure as per MPWH guidelines. The target excludes category A (involuntary resettlement, environment and indigenous people)

interventions.
For irrigation schemes that are crossing 2 districts – with one of them not a participating district – the downstream area hydraulically connected to the rehabilitated
infrastructure will be accounted as functioning.
Appendix 4 55

Appendix 4: Status of Disbursement-Linked Indicators

(As of XXX)

Actual Achievement
Disbursement-Linked Indicators Baseline Value Baseline Year Target Value {Year} {Year}
Outcome
1.
2.
Outputs
3.
4.
Other Results
5.
6.
56 Appendix 5

Appendix 5: Disbursement-Linked Indicator Verification Protocols

(As of February 2017)
Disbursement-Linked Definition and Description of Achievement and Verification Information Source Verification Agency and
Indicator and Frequency Procedure
Outcome
DLI 1: By 2021, Definition. The irrigation performance index or Indek Kinerja Sistem Irigasi (IKSI) is DOM reporting Each year, the focal unit in
performance of calculated based on 6 criteria, with a possible total score of 100 as stipulated in the supported by DILL, DOM prepares an
irrigation systems in Ministry of Public Works and Housing regulation 12/2015 or its update.. The 6 RBOs, WRAs and attestation that the DLI is
the program area criteria are measured and weighted for every irrigation scheme as follows: (i) MOHA met and attaches the
improved by at least functioning infrastructure (45%); (ii) agriculture productivity (15%); (iii) supporting relevant report.
15% from baseline facilities for O&M (10%); (iv) adequacy of human resources for O&M (15%); (v) Frequency for
level adequacy of data and information (5%); (vi) water user association participation reporting will be The IVA will verify the
(10%). annual or semi- results each year in DOM
annual when where the database is
DGWR has a system for measuring this Index that involves collection of field data in necessary.. housed. The IVA will verify
a series of forms. However, monitoring the results by spot checks of
may be as frequent the system at central level
Baseline: The IKSI is measured for irrigation schemes under national authority in the as necessary. (where the data are
program area. In 2015, the average IKSI for national schemes in the program area housed), and at district,
was 60 %. There is no baseline for subnational schemes. province and scheme level,
where sampling and spot
“Program area” means irrigation schemes of more than 400 ha and 10 irrigation checks of the IKSI
schemes with an area of less than 200 ha included in the selected 74 districts calculation and criteria will
across 16 provinces. be undertaken.

The definition of targets each year is geared towards strengthening the IKSI The IVA will refer to the
monitoring to be able to (a) set baseline data for 2017, (b) ensure the channels for verification guidelines
regular data collection and annual report are well established and produce annual prepared for the program.
reports by 2018, and (c) start tracking performance index improvement in 2019,
2020, and 2021. This system will be combined with the IAMIS described in DLI 5, The IVA might require
when complete. independent technical
expertise, which could be
Conditions for disbursement are met if the target specified each year is achieved. drawn from a body outside
the Government such as an
Partial disbursement: The DLI is scalable and partial disbursement is allowed. If Indonesian university or
the target for each year is not met, then disbursement can be proportional to the independent expert.
increase made (e.g., if an improvement in IKSI for the program area is increased by
only half the target set, then 50% of the planned disbursement for that year can be
made).

Disbursements are allowed for early or late achievement of the DLI. This means that
the planned disbursement amount for a given year can be released when the set
target is fully achieved even if the achievement is a year or more late, as long as the
achievement is during the program’s duration.
Appendix 5 57

Disbursement-Linked Definition and Description of Achievement and Verification Information Source Verification Agency and
Indicator and Frequency Procedure
Output
DLI 2. Planning and Definitions. DOM and DILL The focal unit in DOM
engineering reporting supported prepares an attestation that
guidelines for “updated” means that guidelines are acceptable for the technical agencies by MOHA the DLI is met and attaches
irrigation delivery the relevant report.
systems are “Officially issued” means that the updated guidelines have been legalized by the Frequency for
improved by 2019 technical agencies reporting will be The IVA will refer to the
annual or semi- verification guidelines
“Disseminated” means that the updated guidelines have been distributed annual when prepared for the program.
electronically and explained to national and subnational water resources agencies necessary.
by the central government through 1 regional roadshow on year 2018 However, monitoring
may be as frequent
The purpose of this indicator is to ensure that Program innovations and approaches as necessary.
become part of the institutional framework for irrigation systems O&M and
management.

Conditions for disbursement are met if the government issues the regulations or
guidelines

Partial disbursement: The DLI is scalable and partial disbursement is allowed. If

the target for each year is not met, then disbursement can be proportional to the
increase made. The updated detailed engineering design guidelines weight for 50%,
Others are pro rata

Disbursements are allowed for early or late achievement of the DLI. This means that
the planned disbursement amount for a given year can be released when the set
target is fully achieved even if the achievement is a year or more late, as long as the
achievement is during the program’s duration.
DLI 3: Irrigation Definitions. Irrigation commissions can be at both district and province level. DOM reporting Each year, the focal unit in
Commissions An irrigation commission is considered to be “operationalized” based on the updated based MOHA DOM prepares an
operationalized to performance indicators. reporting attestation that the DLI is
enhance institutional met and attaches the
capacity for Conditions for disbursement are met if the number of commissions each year Frequency for relevant report.
integration and meeting the definition above is equal to or more than the target number of reporting will be
coordination of “operationalized” commissions for that year. annual. However, The IVA will refer to the
agriculture and monitoring may be verification guidelines
infrastructure Partial disbursement: The DLI is scalable and partial disbursement is allowed. If as frequent as prepared for the program.
development in 74 the target for each year is not met, then disbursement can be proportional to the necessary.
districts and 14 increase made (e.g., if the number of commissions meeting the definition and The IVA will verify the
provinces by 2021 conditions set above is equivalent to half of the target number for that year, then results at district and
50% of the planned disbursement for that year can be made). province level through spot
checks.
58 Appendix 5

Disbursement-Linked Definition and Description of Achievement and Verification Information Source Verification Agency and
Indicator and Frequency Procedure
Disbursements are allowed for early or late achievement of the DLI. This means that
the planned disbursement amount for a given year can be released when the set
target is fully achieved even if the achievement is a year or more late, as long as the
achievement is during the program’s duration.
DLI 4: At least 74 Definitions. District Irrigation Development and Management Plans or Rencana DOM reporting Each year, the focal unit in
district Irrigation Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan Irigasi (RP2I) are the aggregation of available supported by MOHA DOM prepares an
Development and irrigation scheme level IAMPs covering national, province, and district levels in line attestation that the DLI is
Management Plan with requirements set in the Ministry of Public Works and Housing regulation Frequency for met and attaches the
(RP2I) endorsed by 12/2015 and its update. RP2Is cover irrigated agriculture development on a 5-year reporting will be relevant report.
district heads horizon and are updated every year. annual. However,
monitoring may be The IVA will refer to the
“Endorsed” means that the head of district government (Bupati) endorses the RP2I as frequent as verification guidelines
through a legal letter as a step for inclusion into the sector plan and budget of the necessary. prepared for the program.
district/province agencies. The budget should incorporate operations and
maintenance needs. This process is called “internalization.” The IVA will verify the
results at district level
Conditions for disbursement are met if the number of RP2I that have been through spot checks.
endorsed by the district head..

Partial disbursement: The DLI is scalable and partial disbursement is allowed. If

the target for each year is not met, then disbursement can be proportional to the
increase made (e.g., if the number of aggregated IAMPs meeting the definition set
above is equivalent to 50% of the target number for that year, then 50% of the
planned disbursement for that year can be made).

Disbursements are allowed for early or late achievement of the DLI. This means that
the planned disbursement amount for a given year can be released when the set
target is fully achieved, even if the achievement is a year or more late, as long as
the achievement is during the program’s duration.
DLI 5: Irrigation asset Definitions: An “upgraded” irrigation asset management system (IAMS) software DOM reporting Each year, the focal unit in
management means that the IAMIS software is web-based with geographic information system supported by the DOM prepares an
improved for 2.5 interface combining the functionalities of the previous Pengelolaan Aset Irigasi (PAI) DGWR data center, attestation that the DLI is
million hectares of and the Rencana Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan Irrigasi (RP2I) information RBOs, WRAs and met and attaches the
irrigation systems by systems in line with the requirements of the Ministry of Public Works and Housing MOHA relevant report.
2021 regulation 23/2015.
Frequency for The IVA will verify the
“Migration of existing data into the upgraded IAMIS” means that data collected for reporting will be results at scheme through
national schemes using the PAI format are converted into the new format and annual or semi- sampling and spot checks.
imported into the upgraded IAMIS. annual when
necessary.. The IVA will refer to the
“Updated data and maps for IAMIS” means that: (i) location of irrigation However, monitoring verification guidelines
infrastructure (canal, headworks, diversion, turn out, drop, gate, aqueduct, drain) are may be as frequent prepared for the program.
Appendix 5 59

Disbursement-Linked Definition and Description of Achievement and Verification Information Source Verification Agency and
Indicator and Frequency Procedure
digitalized and imported into the IAMIS: and (ii) dimensions and conditions of as necessary. The IVA might require
irrigation infrastructure have been validated through field check and are inputted in independent technical
the IAMIS. expertise, which could be
drawn from a body outside
The indicator relates first, to strengthening and upgrading the current IAMIS, and the Government such as an
second, to the number of hectares of irrigation systems for which IAMIS data set Indonesian university or
has been thus updated. independent expert.

Conditions for disbursement are met if conditions specified in the DLI table each
year are met. In the last four years, conditions for disbursement are met when digital
geo-referenced information on irrigation infrastructure is inputted into the IAMIS and
validated through field check that meets the definition above is equal to or more
than the target number of hectares for that year.

Partial disbursement: The DLI is scalable and partial disbursement is allowed. If

the target for each year is not met, then disbursement can be proportional to the
increase made (e.g., if the number of hectares meeting the definition and conditions
set above is equivalent to 50% of the target number for that year, then 50% of the
planned disbursement for that year can be made).

Disbursements are allowed for early or late achievement of the DLI. This means that
the planned disbursement amount for a given year can be released when the set
target is fully achieved even if the achievement is a year or more late, as long as the
achievement is during the program’s duration.
DLI 6: Effective Definitions. The DLI will be met when water user associations (WUAs) are DOM reporting Each year, the focal unit in
management of considered operationalized as per performance evaluation in line with updated supported by RBOs, DOM prepares an
tertiary irrigation guidelines in line with the Ministry of Public Works and Housing regulation WRAs and MOHA attestation that the DLI is
systems through 30/2015 and its update. met and attaches the
operationalizing at Frequency for relevant report.
least 4,500 WUAs by “Program area” means irrigation schemes included in the selected 74 districts reporting will be
2021 across 16 provinces. annual. However, The IVA will verify the
monitoring may be results at scheme and
Conditions for disbursement are met if the number of WUAs each year as frequent as community level through
meeting the definition above is equal to or more than the target number of WUAs necessary. sampling and spot checks.
for that year.
The IVA will refer to the
Partial disbursement: The DLI is scalable and partial disbursement is allowed. verification guidelines
If the target for each year is not met, then disbursement can be proportional to prepared for the program.
the increase made (e.g., if the number of WUAs meeting the definition and
conditions set above is equivalent to 50% of the target number for that year, then The IVA might require
50% of the planned disbursement for that year can be made). independent technical
expertise, which could be
Disbursements are allowed for early or late achievement of the DLI. This means drawn from a body outside
60 Appendix 5

Disbursement-Linked Definition and Description of Achievement and Verification Information Source Verification Agency and
Indicator and Frequency Procedure
that the planned disbursement amount for a given year can be released when the Government such as an
the set target is fully achieved even if the achievement is a year or more late, as Indonesian university or
long as the achievement is during the program’s duration. independent expert.

DLI 7: Improved Definitions. The Social, Economic Technical and Institutional Profiles DOM reporting Each year, the focal unit in
assessments (SETIP/PSETK) will go beyond the usual assessments and be in line with the based on by RBOs, MOHA prepares an
integrating updated requirements to include environmental, livelihoods, agricultural, and WRAs and MOHA attestation that the DLI is
agriculture and institutional assessments. reporting met and attaches the
infrastructure relevant report.
development “Program area” means irrigation schemes included in the selected 74 districts Frequency for
conducted for at least across 16 provinces reporting will be The IVA will verify the
719 priority schemes annual. However, results at scheme level
by 2021 Conditions for disbursement are met if the number of SETIPs/PSETK as monitoring may be through sampling and spot
specified above for each year is equal to or more than the target number of as frequent as checks.
assessments for that year. necessary.
The IVA will refer to the
Partial disbursement: The DLI is scalable and partial disbursement is allowed. verification guidelines
If the target for each year is not met, then disbursement can be proportional to prepared for the program.
the increase made (e.g., if the number of SETIPs/PSETK meeting the definition
and conditions set above is equivalent to half the target number for that year, The IVA might require
then 50% of the planned disbursement for that year can be made). independent technical
Disbursements are allowed for early or late achievement of the DLI. This means expertise, which could be
that the planned disbursement amount for a given year can be released when drawn from a body outside
the set target is fully achieved even if the achievement is a year or more late, as the Government such as an
long as the achievement is during the program’s duration. Indonesian university or
independent expert.
DLI 8: Rehabilitated Definitions. The irrigation infrastructure in program areas that have been DOM reporting Each year, the focal unit in
irrigation rehabilitated and upgraded as per MPWH technical standards includes all or based on DILL, DILL prepares an attestation
infrastructure in parts of irrigation schemes, including headworks; primary, secondary and tertiary RBOs, WRAs and that the DLI is met and
program areas canals; associated structures (such as diversion, turn out, drop, gate, aqueduct, MOHA reporting attaches the relevant report.
increased by 500,000 culvert, drains) and which function well, meaning that the irrigation infrastructure
ha by 2021 as a system delivers irrigation water to the target tertiary blocks. Frequency for The IVA will verify the
reporting will be results at scheme level,
“Program area” means irrigation schemes included in the selected 74 districts annual. However, where sampling and spot
across 16 provinces. monitoring may be checks of the rehabilitation
as frequent as undertaken.
For irrigation schemes that are crossing 2 districts – with one of them not a necessary. The IVA will be provided
participating district – the downstream area hydraulically connected to the with completion reports of
rehabilitated infrastructure will be accounted as functioning. rehabilitation works
prepared by the RBOs and
Conditions for disbursement are met if the number of hectares served by WRAs.
Appendix 5 61

rehabilitated/ upgraded irrigation infrastructure each year is equal to or more The IVA will refer to the
than the target number of hectares set for that year. verification guidelines
prepared for the program
Partial disbursement: The DLI is scalable and partial disbursement is allowed. The IVA might require
If the target for each year is not met, then disbursement can be proportional to independent technical
the increase made (e.g., if an increase in hectares meeting the definition and expertise, which could be
conditions set above is equivalent to 50% of the target hectares for that year, drawn from a body outside
50% of the planned disbursement for that year can be made). the Government such as an
Disbursements are allowed for early or late achievement of the DLI. This means Indonesian university or
that the planned disbursement amount for a given year can be released when independent expert
the set target is fully achieved even if the achievement is a year or more late, as
long as the achievement is during the program’s duration.
BAPPEDA = provincial and district planning and development agency, DGWR = Directorate General of Water Resources, DILL = Directorate of
Irrigation and Low Land, DLI = disbursement-linked indicator, DOM = Directorate of Operation and Maintenance, ha = hectare, IAMIS = Irrigation Asset
Management System, IAMP = Irrigated Agriculture Management Plan, IKSI = Irrigation System Performance Index, IVA = independent verification agency,
MOHA = Ministry of Home Affairs, MPWH = Ministry of Public Works and Housing, O&M = operation and maintenance, PAI = Pengelolaan Aset Irigasi,
PPISP = participatory irrigation management or Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan Sistem Irigasi Partisipatip, PROM = preparation for operation and
maintenance, RBO = river basin organization, RP2I = Rencana Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan Irigasi, SETIP = Social, Economic, Technical and
Institutional Profile , WUA = water user association, WRA = water resource agency.
Data sources: Asian Development Bank; Directorate General of Water Resources, Ministry of Public Works and Housing; Ministry of Home Affairs.
62 Appendix 6

Appendix 6: Progress in Disbursement-Linked Indicator Verification

(As of XXXX)

Disbursement-Linked Indicators Progress in Verification Issues and Changesa

Outcome

Outputs

{Add or delete rows as needed.

The number of DLIs should be limited and should generally not exceed 10. Ensure these indicators are specific, measureable, achievable, relevant, time-bound, and
transparent.}
a Delete this column if it is irrelevant.

Source{s}: {List table source(s).}.

Appendix 7 63

Appendix 7: Expected Disbursement Schedule1

($ million)
(As of February 2017)

Total ADB Share of total

Indicator financing ADB 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
allocation financing %
DLI 1: By 2021, performance of irrigation systems
in the program area improved by at least 15% from 42.0 7.0% 0.0 6.0 6.0 15.0 15.0 42.0
baseline level
DLI 2. Planning and engineering guidelines for
36.0 6.0% 18.0 15.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 36.0
irrigation delivery systems are improved by 2019
DLI 3: Irrigation Commissions operationalized to
enhance institutional capacity for integration and
coordination of agriculture and infrastructure 54.0 9.0% 6.0 24.0 12.0 6.0 6.0 54.0
development in 74 districts and 14 provinces by
2021
DLI 4: At least 74 district irrigation management
development Plans (RP2I) endorsed by district 18.0 3.0% 0.0 0.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 18.0
heads
DLI 5: Irrigation asset management improved for
138.0 23.0% 18.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 138.0
2.5 million hectares of irrigation systems by 2021
DLI 6: Effective management of tertiary irrigation
systems through operationalizing at least 4,500 24.0 4.0% 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 0.0 24.0
WUAs by 2021
DLI 7: Improved assessments integrating
agriculture and infrastructure development 36.0 6.0% 12.0 12.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 36.0
conducted for at least 719 priority schemes by 2021
DLI 8: Rehabilitated irrigation infrastructure in
252.0 42.0% 78.0 57.0 63.0 39.0 15.0 252.0
program areas increased by 500,000 ha by 2021
TOTAL $600.0 100.0% 138 150 138 102 72 600.0
Source: Asian Development Bank.

1
Amounts will be disbursed on a pro-rata basis (83.3% OCR and 16.7% AIF).
64 Appendix 8

Appendix 8: Disbursement Status

(As of XXX)

ADB Share of Expected Actual

Financing Total ADB Disbursement by Disbursement by Share of Total ADB
Allocation Financing {month and year} {month and year} Financing Disbursed
DLIs ($ million) (%) ($ million) ($ million) (%)

Total 100.0
DLI = disbursement linked indicator.
Appendix 9 65

Appendix 9: Estimated Program Expenditure

(As of XXXX)

Share of
Cumulative Total
Estimated Share of Total Expenditures Cumulative
Expenditures Over the Expenditures of to Date Expenditures
Past Year (xxxx–xxxx) the Past year (xxxx–xxxx) to Date
Items ($ million) (%) ($ million) (%)
1. Item A 0.0 0.0
2. Item B 0.0 0.0
3. Item C 0.0 0.0
Total 0.0 0.0 100.0
{Either define abbreviations within the table or list them alphabetically and define them below the table. Use a consistent approach and do not define some in the table
and others below the table.}
Source{s}: {List table source(s).}.
66 Appendix 10

Appendix 10: Status of Program Financing Plan

(As of XXXX)

Cumulative
Amount of Share of Total
Financing over Share of Total Financing To Cumulative
Source
the Past Year Financing of Date Financing to
(xxxx–xxxx) the Past year (xxxx–xxxx) Date
($ million) (%) ($ million) (%)
1 Government
a) National Budget (APBN)
2 Development partners a
a) Asian Development Bank
1) Ordinary capital resources (loan) b
2) ASEAN Infrastructure Fund(loan)
b) Others
Total 100.0
Notes:
a IFAD Funds will be channeled through the Ministry of Agriculture.
b
$500 million for the first program and $400 million targeted for second program in 2018.
Source: Government’s Planning Documents
Appendix 11 67

Appendix 11: Key Outstanding Issues and Actions

(As of XXXX)

Number Key Issues Status in Addressing the Issues Next Steps Responsible Agencies and People Timeframe for Implementation
68 Appendix 12

Appendix 12: Changes in Scope and Implementation Arrangements

(As of XXXX)

Names of Documents
{List names of the document authorizing the
Changes and Key reasons changes, e.g., Memo approved by Director xxx
Number {Summarize the changes and reasons. Be brief.} Date dated xxxx}.
1

{Add or delete rows as needed.}

{Either define abbreviations within the table or list them alphabetically and define them below the table. Use a consistent approach and do not define some in the table
and others below the table.
Source{s}: {List table source(s).}
Appendix 13 69

Appendix 13: Changes in Key Executing Agency Staff and ADB Mission Leader
(As of xxxx)

Reasons for the Change

Number Changes Date {Summarize the reasons. Be brief.}
1

{Add or delete rows as needed.}

{Either define abbreviations within the table or list them alphabetically and define them below the table. Use a consistent approach and do not define some in
the table and others below the table.
Source{s}: {List table source(s).}