2 Mercaptobenzothiazole Toxicology
2 Mercaptobenzothiazole Toxicology
STUDIES OF
2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
(GAVAGE STUDIES)
The NTP is made up of four charter DHHS agencies: the National Cancer
Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health; the National Institute of En-
vironmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health; the
National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), Food and Drug Ad-
ministration; and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control. In July 1981, the Carcino-
genesis Bioassay Testing Program, NCI, was transferred to the NIEHS.
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
NTP TECHNICAL REPORT
ON THE
STUDIES OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
(GAVAGE STUDIES)
May 1988
NTP TR 332
NOTETOTHEREADER
This study was performed under the direction of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sci-
ences as a function of the National Toxicology Program. The studies described in this Technical Re-
port have been conducted in compliance with NTP chemical health and safety requirements and must
meet or exceed all applicable Federal, state, and local health and safety regulations. Animal care and
use were in accordance with the U.S.Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Ani-
mals. All NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies are subjected to a data audit before being pre-
sented for public peer review.
Although every effort is made to prepare the Technical Reports as accurately as possible, mistakes
may occur. Readers are requested to identify any mistakes so that corrective action may be taken.
Further, anyone who is aware of related ongoing or published studies not mentioned in this report is
encouraged to make this information known to the NTP. Comments and questions about the
National Toxicology Program Technical Reports on Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies should be
directed to Dr. J.E. Huff, National Toxicology Program, P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709 (919-541-3780).
These NTP Technical Reports are available for sale from the National Technical Information Service,
U.S.Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, S p r i n ~ i e l dVA
, 22161 (703-487-4650). Single
copies of this Technical Report are available without charge (and while supplies last) from the NTP
Public Information Office, National Toxicology Program, P.O.Box 12233, Research Triangle Park,
NC 27709.
PAGE
ABSTRACT ............................................................................... 5
CONTRIBUTORS .......................................................................... 9
I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 13
RATS .......................................................................... 34
SURVIVAL ................................................................. 38
MICE .......................................................................... 46
SURVIVAL . . . e. 51
PATHOLOGY AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES O F RESULTS , .....,.,.,........,..
.51
APPENDIXES
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 4
2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
CAS NO.149-30-4
ABSTRACT
Sixteen-Day and Thirteen-Week Studies: In 16-day studies, mean body weight gains of rats receiving
2,500 m g k g were 6-7 g lower than those of vehicle controls; 415 male and 515 female mice dosed with
3,000 mg/kg and 415 female mice dosed with 1,500 mg/kg died; lethargy and prostration occurred in
most of these animals after gavage. Based on these results, doses selected for both species in the 13-
week studies were 0,94 (mice only), 188,375,750, and 1,500 mg/kg.
In 13-week studies, no chemical-related deaths occurred in rats, but body weight gains in males dosed
with 1,500 mg/kg and in females dosed with 750 or 1,500 mg/kg were lower than those in the vehicle
control groups. Hepatomegaly occurred a t the two highest doses in males and at all doses in females;
however, no microscopic pathologic changes were noted in any tissue. More than half the mice dosed
with 1,500 mg/kg died, but no compound-related body weight changes occurred. Clinical signs in
mice were dose related and included lethargy in animals dosed with 375 mg/kg and lacrimation, sali-
vation, and clonic seizure in some dosed with 750 or 1,500 mg/kg. No association between these clini-
cal signs of toxicity and gross or microscopic pathologic effects was observed. Doses selected for the 2-
year studies were 0, 375, and 750 mg/kg for male rats and for mice of each sex and 0, 188, or 375
mg/kg for female rats.
Body Weight and Survival in the Two-year Studies: Fifty animals of each species and sex were ad-
ministered 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in corn oil by gavage 5 days per week for 103 weeks. Adminis-
tration of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole resulted in decreased survival in dosed male rats (vehicle control,
42/50; low dose, 22/50; high dose, 20/50) and in the high dose group of female mice (37150; 39/50;
22/50) but not in female rats (28/50; 31/50; 25/50) or in male mice (38150; 33/50; 30/50). No effect on
body weight gain in dosed rats was observed; in dosed mice, minor reductions occurred between weeks
3 and 64, with recovery thereafter. Postgavage lethargy and prostration occurred frequently in dosed
rats and mice.
Nonneoplastic and Neoplastic Effects in the Two-year Studies: The severity of nephropathy was in-
creased in dosed male rats. Ulcers and inflammation of the forestomach were prevalent in dosed rats,
as were increased incidences of epithelial hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis in male rats, but no neo-
plasms of the forestomach were observed. There were no increases of nonneoplastic lesions in mice
which were considered to be compound related.
5 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
The incidences of a variety of tumors were increased in rats dosed with 2-mercaptobenzothiazole;
some of the increased incidences were not dose related. In low dose male rats, increased incidences
(P<O.Ol) were observed for mononuclear cell leukemia (7150; 16/50; 3/50) and pancreatic acinar cell
adenomas (2/50; 13/50; 6/49). Increased tumor incidences with dose-related trends (P< 0.05) included
pituitary gland adenomas in females (15/49; 24/50; 25/50), preputial gland adenomas or carcinomas
(combined) in males (160; 6/50; 5/50), adrenal gland pheochromocytomas or malignant pheochromo-
cytomas (combined) in males (18/50; 27/50; 24/49), and pheochromocytomas in females (1/50; 5/50;
6/50). These tumors were observed a t significantly greater incidences (PS0.05) in the high dose
groups than in the vehicle controls.
Audit: The data, documents, and pathology materials from the 2-year studies of 2-mercaptobenzo-
thiazole were audited at the NTP Archives. The audit findings show that the conduct of the studies is
documented adequately and support the data and results given in this Technical Report.
Conclusions: Under the conditions of these 2-year gavage studies, there was some evidence of carcino-
genic activity* of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole for male F344/N rats, indicated by increased incidences of
mononuclear cell leukemia, pancreatic acinar cell adenomas, adrenal gland pheochromocytomas, and
preputial gland adenomas or carcinomas (combined). There was some evidence of carcinogenic activity
for female F344/N rats, indicated by increased incidences of adrenal gland pheochromocytomas and
pituitary gland adenomas. There was no evidence of carcinogenic activity of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole
for male B6C3F1 mice dosed with 375 or 750 mg/kg. There was equivocal evidence ofcarcinogenic ac-
tivity for female B6C3F1 mice, indicated by increased incidences of hepatocellular adenomas or carci-
nomas (combined).
A summary of the Peer Review comments and the public discussion on this Technical Report appears on pages 11-12.
Male F344/N Rats Female F344/N Rats Male B6C3F1 Mice Female B6C3F1 Mice
Doses
375 or 750 mg/kg 2-mercapto- 188or 375 mg/kg 2-mercapto- 375 or 750 mg/kg 2-mercapto- 375 or 750 mg/kg
benzothiazole in corn oil, benzothiazole in corn oil, benzothiazole in corn oil, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole
5dhvk 5 d/wk 5 d/wk in corn oil, 5 d/wk
Genetic toxicology
Not mutagenic in S. typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, or TA1537 with or without metabolic activation; significant
increases in chromosomal aberrations and SCEs in CHO cells with S9; mutagenic at TK locus of mouse L5178Y lymphoma cells
with S9.
Metastases;
Supporting information from proliferative lesions (hyperplasia) in the same site of neoplasia or in other experiments (same lesion
The concurrent control tumor incidence as well as the historical control rate and variability for a specific neoplasm;
These considerations together with the definitions as written should be used as composite guidelines for selecting one of the five cate-
gories. Additionally, the following concepts (as patterned from the International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs) have been
adopted by the NTPto give further clarification of these issues:
The term chemical carcinogenesis generally means the induction by chemicals of neoplasms not usually observed, the induction by
chemicals of more neoplasms than are generally found, or the earlier induction by chemicals of neoplasms that are commonly ob-
served. Different mechanisms may be involved in these situations. Etymologically, the term carcinogenesis means induction of
cancer, that is, of malignant neoplasms; however, the commonly accepted meaning is the induction of various types of neoplasms or
of a combination of malignant and benign neoplasms. In the Technical Reports, the words tumor and neoplasm a r e used
interchangeably.
The NTP Technical Report on the Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole
is based on the 13-week studies that began in November 1980 (rats) or August 1980 (mice) and ended
in February 1981 (rats) or November 1980 (mice) and on the 2-year studies that began in July 1981
and ended in July 1983 at Physiological Research Laboratories (Minneapolis, Minnesota).
National Toxicology P r o g r a m
The members of the Peer Review Panel who evaluated the draft Technical Report on 2-mercaptoben-
zothiazole on March 4,1987, are listed below. Panel members serve as independent scientists, not as
representatives of any institution, company, or governmental agency. In this capacity, Panel mem-
bers have five major responsibilities: (a)to ascertain that all relevant literature data have been ade-
quately cited and interpreted, (b) to determine if the design and conditions of the NTP studies were
appropriate, (c) to ensure that the Technical Report presents the experimental results and conclu-
sions fully and clearly, (d) to judge the significance of the experimental results by scientific criteria,
and (e) to assess the evaluation of the evidence of carcinogenicity and other observed toxic responses.
National Toxicology Program Board of Scientific Counselors
Berkeley, California
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 10
SUMMARY OF PEER REVIEW COMMENTS
2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
On March 4,1987, the draft Technical Report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 2-mer-
captobenzothiazole received peer review by the National Toxicology Program Board of Scientific
Counselors’ Technical Reports Review Subcommittee and associated Panel of Experts. The review
meeting was held at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina.
Dr. M. Dieter, NTP, began the discussion by reviewing the experimental design, results, and proposed
conclusions (some evidence of carcinogenic activity for male and female rats, no evidence of carcino-
genic activity for male mice, equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity for female mice).
Dr. Hooper, a principal reviewer, agreed with the conclusions as written. However, he argued that in-
creased incidences of preputial gland adenomas or carcinomas (combined) should be included in sup-
port of the conclusion for male rats. Dr. Dieter agreed that it was valid to include the preputial gland
tumors along with the mononuclear cell leukemia as some evidence of carcinogenic activity and that
the conclusion and other appropriate sections of the Technical Report could be revised to reflect this
change. Dr. S. Eustis, NIEHS, commented that this tumor was not originally included in the list of
evidence because although the incidence of preputial gland tumors in this study was twice the histori-
cal mean, the incidence also fell within the historical range. Dr. Hooper noted the lack of tumors in
high dose male rats compared with a n elevated tumor incidence in low dose male rats for several neo-
plasms, including mononuclear cell leukemia. Dr. Dieter said that there was just one other tumor be-
sides mononuclear cell leukemia, pancreatic acinar cell adenomas in male rats, for which there was
an effect only a t the low dose. Dose-related increases occurred in two tumor types, including adrenal
gland tumors in male and female rats and pituitary gland tumors in female rats.
As a second principal reviewer, Dr. Popp agreed in principle with the conclusions. He said that the
issue for decision was whether the conclusions for rats should remain as written or be lowered to
equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity.
As a third principal reviewer, Dr. Chinchilli agreed with the conclusions as written. He asked that an
incidence table for mononuclear cell leukemia in female rats be added to the Results section.
Dr. Harold Grice, Cantox, Inc. Canada, representing the Chemical Manufacturers Association, men-
tioned several factors that he felt made interpretation of the increased tumor rates in male rats diffi-
cult. These factors included reduced survival in both dose groups, compound-induced kidney toxicity,
gavage stress, and postgavage lethargy. Dr. Grice thought that the conclusion for male rats should be
lowered to equivocal evidence of carcinogenic activity.
Since the low dose animals were placed in the cage racks nearest the room fluorescent lights and
because cages were not rotated in these studies, there was speculation as to whether photoactivation
of the chemical might have been a factor in toxicitylcarcinogenicity. Although the incidence of eye
lesions (retinopathy and cataracts) could be correlated with cage position, there was no consensus
that increased tumor rates in low dose rats could be associated with exposure to light.
In other discussion, Dr. Hooper thought that the small but significant increase in renal neoplasms in
male rats (tubular cell adenomas and transitional cell papillomas/carcinomas) might have been
chemically associated. Dr. Eustis said that the renal tumors were not considered chemically related
because the two cell types are generally not combined and the tumors were split between dose groups.
Dr. Hooper moved that the Technical Report on 2-mercaptobenzothiazole be accepted with the revi-
sions discussed and the conclusions as written for male and female rats, some evidence of carcinogenic
activity, for male mice, no evidence of carcinogenic activity, and for female mice, equivocal evidence
of carcinogenic activity. He asked that the increased incidences of preputial gland adenomas or car-
cinomas (combined) in male rats be cited. Dr. Gallo seconded the motion, which was approved unani-
mously with seven votes.
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 12
I. INTRODUCTION
13 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
I. INTRODUCTION
2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
shown to exert neurotoxic and hepatotoxic ef- biosynthesis, was inhibited 40% below control
fects in mice after acute or short-term exposure values in brain tissue taken from mice 1 hour
(Johnson et al., 1970; Guess and O’Leary, 1969). after a 200 mg/kg intraperitoneal injection of 2-
mercaptobenzothiazole. In the same tissues
Dermal Toxicity used for in vitro studies, there was 47% inhibi-
tion after less than 7 pM 2-mercaptobenzothia-
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole was shown to be a very zole was added to t h e reaction m i x t u r e .
strong contact allergen in guinea pigs (Maurer Grassetti et al. (1970) showed that 1 mM 2-mer-
et al., 1979) but was judged a moderate contact captobenzothiazole added in vitro affected carbo-
sensitizer in humans (Goodwin et al., 1981). hydrate metabolism in Ehrlich ascites tumor
Rubber additives, such as salts of 2-mercapto- cells, causing a slight inhibition of the hexose
benzothiazole, have been reported to cause monophosphate shunt pathway and a moderate
dermatitis in humans (Bauer, 1972). 2-Mercap- stimulation of the tricarboxylic acid cycle. An
tobenzothiazole was more soluble in a salt solu- intraperitoneal injection of 100 mg/kg 2-mer-
tion approximating human perspiration than in captobenzothiazole lowered blood glucose con-
water (Ito et al., 1979). The sensitizing proper- centrations in rabbits 5 hours after administra-
ties of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole were reviewed tion (Chiba, 1969).
by Fisher (1973) and Santodonato et al. (19761,
who noted that allergic contact dermatitis in hu- Absorption, Distribution, a n d Metabolism
mans is often caused by rubber products.
Absorption, tissue distribution, and metabolism
Reproductive Toxicity studies of radiolabeled 2-mercaptobenzothiazole
in guinea pigs showed that the chemical was ab-
Embryotoxic effects of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole sorbed through the skin and that abrasion in-
in rats were reported (Aleksandrov, 19821, but creased this rate; initially, the kidney, liver, and
these results were not corroborated in more ex- thyroid gland were the principal organs of up-
tensive studies in rats administered 200 mg/kg take, with the thyroid gland ultimately attain-
2-mercaptobenzothiazole by intraperitoneal in- ing the highest concentration of 2-mercapto-
jection on days 1-15 of gestation (Hardin et al., benzothiazole 48 hours after subcutaneous
1981). There were no chemically related histo- injection; 90% of the compound was conjugated
pathologic effects in maternal tissues, and no with glucuronides and sulfates and excreted in
maternal toxicity, fetal toxicity, or teratogenesis the urine 6 hours after injection (Nagamatsu et
was observed. In a long-term study, no cumula- al., 1979). The urinary metabolites of [W-mer-
tive effects on reproduction or lactation were ob- captol2-mercaptobenzothiazole in rats dosed by
served in rats fed ad libitum 5,000 ppm of a for- intraperitoneal injection consisted of conjugates
mulation containing 2.4% 2-mercaptobenzothia- of glutathione, glucuronic acid, and inorganic
zole and 27.6% dimethyldithiocarbamate sulfate (Colucci and Buyske, 1965); these au-
through the second generation (Lehman, 1965). thors proposed three possible metabolic path-
ways for 2-mercaptobenzothiazole which started
Biochemical Effects with a benzothiazole-2-glutathionemetabolite
and proceeded either through benzothiazole-2-
Biochemical studies suggested that 2-mercapto- cysteine to benzothiazole-2-mercapturic acid
benzothiazole was capable of enzyme inhibition that was eliminated in the urine, or to benzo-
in vivo and in vitro (Johnson et al., 1970; thiazole-2-mercaptan that then was eliminated
Grassetti et al., 1970). Dopamine j3-hydroxylase, in the urine as either benzothiazole-2-mercapto-
an enzyme in the pathway for norepinephrine glucuronide or as inorganic sulfate.
Supplier
R.T. Vanderbilt Co., Same as first 16-d studies Same RS first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies
Inc. (Norwalk,CT)
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 20
0
z
c4
0
21 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole, NTP TR 332
0
i
2
s
c!
i
0
0
I
i-
W
u
z
c
E
3
p:
E-c
W
z
It +
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 24
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS
First Sixteen-Day
Second Sixteen-Day
Thirteen-Week
Two-year
Studies
Studies
Studies
Studies
Preparation
A Polytron@homogenizer operated Same as first 16-d studies Similar to first 16-d studies Same a s first 16-d
a t low intensity for 2 min was used studies
to suspend 2-mercaptobenzothiazole
in corn oil
Storage Conditions
Room temperature in the dark Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies 25'C in the dark
Target Determined
Determined as
18.8 17.5 93
37.5 37.1 99
75.0 73.7 98
During the 2-year studies, periodic analysis of mixtures were within specifications 100% of the
dose preparations indicated that concentrations time. Results of periodic referee analyses per-
varied from 93.3% to 108.0% of the target con- formed by the analytical chemistry laboratory
centration (Table 4). Because 42/42 dose mix- indicated generally good agreement with the re-
tures analyzed were within 10% of the target sults from the study laboratory (Table 5).
concentration, it is estimated t h a t the dose
07/08/81
37.8 74.8 140.0
0811218 1
37.8 76.9 149.0
10/20/81
36.6 72.8 147.5
10/28/81
38.2 72.6 146.7
01/13/82
39.1 70.2 157.5
04/07/82
38.7 74.2 146.1
05/05/82
39.8 76.0 147.2
06/23/82
38.3 76.2 144.3
09/08/82
37.1 74.4 144.0
11/17/82
35.4 76.7 149.3
12/01/82
37.8 79.4 156.9
02/16/83
39.9 78.3 158.3
04/27/83
37.7 75.7 151.4
06/08/83
39.0 81.0 147.2
Mean (mg/ml)
38.1 75.7 149.0
Standard deviation
1.22 2.83 5.39
Coefficientof variation (percent)
3.2 3.7 3.6
Range (mg/ml)
35.4-39.9 70.2-81.0 144.0-158.3
Number of samples
14 14 14
~~
Thirteen-Week Studies
09/24/80 150.0 158.1 134.0
11/26/80 37.5 37.7 36.0
Two-year Studies
07/08/81 150.0 140.0 145.0
05/05/82 37.5 39.8 37.1
11/17/82 75.0 76.7 75.0
04/27/83 150.0 151.4 144.0
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 26
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS
FIRST SIXTEEN-DAY STUDIES (The 13-week study in rats reported in this Tech-
nical Report was a second study. In the first
Male and female F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice study in rats, 3,000 mg/kg groups all died during
were obtained from Charles River Breeding Lab- week 1.) Animals were housed five per cage.
oratories and held for 14 days before the studies Feed and water were available ad libitum. Fur-
began. Rats were 6 weeks old when placed on ther experimental details are summarized in Ta-
study, and mice were 6-8 weeks old. Groups of ble 6.
five males and five females were administered 0,
156, 313,625, 1,250, or 2,500 mg/kg 2-mercapto- Animals were checked two times per day; mori-
benzothiazole in corn oil by gavage (12 doses bund animals were killed. Individual animal
over 16 days). Rats and mice were observed weights were recorded weekly. At the end of the
twice per day and were weighed on days 1,8, and 13-week studies, survivors were killed. A ne-
15. A necropsy was performed on all animals. cropsy was performed on all animals except
Details of animal maintenance are presented in those excessively autolyzed or cannibalized. Tis-
Table 6. sues and groups examined are listed in Table 6.
Study Design
Male and female B6C3F1 mice were obtained
from Harlan Industries and held for 19 days be- Groups of 50 male rats and 50 male and 50 fe-
fore the studies began. Mice were 5-6 weeks old male mice were administered 0, 375, or 750
when placed on study. Groups of five males and mg/kg 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in corn oil by
five females were administered 0, 188, 375, 750, gavage, 5 days per week for 103 weeks. Groups
1,500, or 3,000 mg/kg 2-mercaptobenzothiazole of 50 female rats were administered 0, 188, or
in corn oil by gavage (12 doses over 16 days). 375 mg/kg 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in corn oil
Mice were observed twice per day and were by gavage on the same schedule.
weighed on days 1, 8, and 15. A necropsy was
performed on all animals. Details of animal Source and Specifications of Animals
maintenance are presented in Table 6.
The male and female F344/N rats and B6C3F1
THIRTEEN-WEEK STUDIES (C57BL/6N, female X C3H/HeN MTV-, male)
mice used in these studies were produced under
Thirteen-week studies were conducted to evalu- strict barrier conditions a t Charles River Breed-
ate the cumulative toxic effects of repeated ad- ing Laboratories under a contract to the Carci-
ministration of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole and to nogenesis Program. Breeding stock for the
determine the doses to be used in the 2-year foundation colonies a t the production facility
studies. originated at the National Institutes of Health
Repository. Animals shipped for study were
Four- to five-week-old male and female F344/N progeny of defined microflora-associated parents
rats and B6C3F1 mice were obtained from that were transferred from isolators to barrier-
Charles River Breeding Laboratories, observed maintained rooms. Rats were shipped to the
for 19 days (rats) or 18 days (mice), and distrib- study laboratory at 4-5 weeks of age and mice, a t
uted to weight classes and then to cages accord- 6 weeks of age. The animals were quarantined
ing to a table of random numbers. Cages were a t the study laboratory for 13 days. Thereafter,
assigned to dosed and vehicle control groups ac- a complete necropsy was performed on five ani-
cording to a table of random numbers. Groups of mals of each sex and species to assess their
10 rats of each sex were administered 0, 188, health status. The rats were 46 days old and the
375, 750, or 1,500 mg/kg 2-mercaptobenzo- mice, 56 days old when placed on study. The
thiazole in corn oil by gavage, 5 days per week health of the animals was monitored during the
for 13 weeks. Groups of 10 mice of each sex were course of the studies according to the protocols of
administered 0,94,188,375,750, or 1,500 mg/kg the NTP Sentinel Animal Program (Appen-
2-mercaptobenzothiazole on the same schedule. dix F).
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
Size of S t u d y Groups
5 males and 5 females 5 male and 5 female 10 males and 10 females 50 males and 50 females
of each species mice of each species of each species
Doses
0,156,313,625,1,250, 0,188,375,750,1,500, Rats--O,188,375,750, or 1,500 Rats--male: 0,375,or 760 mg/kg
or 2,500 m g k g 2-mercapto- or 3,000 m g k g 2-mercapto- mg/kg 2-mercaptobenzothiazole 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in
benzothiazole in corn oil benzothiazole in corn oil in corn oil by gavage; dose VOL- corn oil by gavage; female:
by gavage; dose Vol--rats: by gavage; dose VOL- 5 mg/kg; mice--0,94,188,375, 0,188, or 375 mgkg; dose VOL-
5 ml/kg except 10 m l k g 10ml/kg 750, or 1,500 mg/kg; dose VOL- 5 mlkg; mice--O,375,or
for 2,500 m g k g groups; 10 mlkg 750 mgkg; dose vol--10 m l k g
mice: 10mVkg
Duration of Dosing
5 d/wk, 12 doses over Same as first 16-d studies 5d/wkfor 13 wk 5 d/wk for 103 wk
16 d
Type and Frequency of Observation
Observed 2 X d; weighed Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies Observed 2 X d; weighed
initially and 1 x wk 1 Xwkfor12wkandl x 4 w k
thereafter thereaffer
Studies Studies
Studies
Studies
Animal Source
Study Laboratory
14 d 19 d
Rats--19 d; mice-18 d 13 d
Age When Placed o n Study
Necropsy Dates
Rats--2/27/80-2/28/80; 5/13/80
Rats--2/17/81; mice--11/17/80 Rats--7/11/83-7/13/83;
mice--2/28/80-2/29/80
mice--7/26/83-7/27/83
Animals distributed to Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-dstudies Same as first 16-d studies
weight classes; assigned
to cages and then to groups
according to tables of
random numbers
Feed
NIH 07 Rat and Mouse Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies
Ration (Zeigler Bros.,
Gardners, PA); available
ad libitum
Bedding
Aspen wood chips Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies
(Minnesota Sawdust and
Shavings Co., Anoka, MN)
Water
Automatic watering Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies;
system (Edstrom softened to < 1 graidgal
Industries, Waterford, hardness with sodium
WI); available ad libitum zeolite; then filtered
through spun polyethylene
Cages
Polycarbonate (Hazleton Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies
Systems, Inc., Aberdeen, MD)
Cage Filters
Reemaye (Dupont, Style Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies Same as first 16-d studies
2024) spun-bondedpolyester
(SnowFiltration Co.,
Cincinnati, OH)
29 2-Mercaptobenzothiaeole,NTP TR 332
TABLE 6. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND MATERIALS AND METHODS IN THE GAVAGE STUDIES
OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE (Continued)
Temp--22.2°-24.4"C; Temp--17.8"-25.5° C;
Ternp--22.2"-26.6"C; Temp--generally 21'-23" C;
hum--38%-50%; hum--35%-70%;
hurn--32%-50%; hum--generally 40%-60%;
fluorescent light 12 h/d fluorescent light 12 h/d
fluorescent light 12 h/d fluorescent light 12 h/d;
15 room air changes/h
A quality control skin grafting program has details of animal maintenance are given in Ta-
been in effect since early 1978 to monitor the ble 6.
genetic integrity of the inbred mice used to pro-
duce the hybrid B6C3F1 study animal. In mid- Clinical Examinations a n d Pathology
1981, data were obtained that showed incom-
patibility between the NIH C3H reference All animals were observed two times per day,
colony and the C3H colony from a Program sup- and clinical signs were recorded once per week.
plier. In August 1981, inbred parental lines of Body weights by cage were recorded once per
mice were further tested for genetic integrity via week for the first 12 weeks of the study and once
isozyme and protein electrophoresis profiles that per month thereafter. Mean body weights were
demonstrate phenotype expressions of known calculated for each group. Animals found mori-
genetic loci. bund and those surviving to the end of the stud-
ies were humanely killed. A necropsy was per-
The C57BW6N mice were homogeneous a t all formed on all animals including those found
loci tested. Eighty-five percent of the C3H mice dead, unless they were excessively autolyzed or
monitored were variant a t one to three loci, indi- cannibalized, missexed, or found missing. Thus,
cating some heterogeneity in the C3H line from the number of animals from which particular or-
this supplier. Nevertheless, the genome of this gans or tissues were examined microscopically
line is more homogeneous than that of randomly varies and is not necessarily equal to the
bred stocks. number of animals that were placed on study.
Male mice from the C3H colony and female mice During necropsy, all organs and tissues were ex-
from the C57BL/6N colony were used as parents amined for grossly visible lesions. Tissues were
for the hybrid B6C3F1 mice used in these stud- preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin, em-
ies. The influence of the potential genetic non- bedded in paraffin, sectioned, and stained with
uniformity in the hybrid mice on these results is hematoxylin and eosin. Tissues examined mi-
not known, but results of the studies are not af- croscopically are listed in Table 6.
fected because concurrent controls were included
in each study. When the pathology evaluation was completed,
the slides, paraffin blocks, and residual wet tis-
Animal Maintenance sues were sent to the NTP Archives for inven-
tory, slide/block match, and wet tissue audit.
Animals were housed five per cage. Feed and The slides, individual animal data records, and
water were available ad libitum. Further pathology tables were sent to a n independent
quality assessment laboratory. The individual Survival Analyses: The probability of survival
animal records and tables were compared for ac- was estimated by the product-limit procedure of
curacy, slides and tissue counts were verified, Kaplan and Meier (1958) and is presented in the
and histotechnique was evaluated. All tumor di- form of graphs. Animals were censored from the
agnoses, all target tissues, and all tissues from a survival analyses at the time they were found to
randomly selected 10% of the animals were eval- be missing or dead from other than natural
uated by a quality assessment pathologist. The causes; animals dying from natural causes were
quality assessment report and slides were sub- not censored. Statistical analyses for a possible
mitted to the Pathology Working Group (PWG) dose-related effect on survival used the method
Chairperson, who reviewed all target tissues of Cox (1972) for testing two groups for equality
and those about which there was a disagreement and Tarone's (1975) life table test for a dose-
between the laboratory and quality assessment related trend. When significant survival differ-
pathologists. ences were detected, additional analyses using
these procedures were carried out to determine
Representative slides selected by the Chairper- the time point at which significant differences in
son were reviewed by the PWG without knowl- the survival curves were first detected. All re-
edge of previously rendered diagnoses. When ported P values for the survival analysis are
the consennun diagnosis of the PWG differed two-sided.
from that of the laboratory pathologist, the labo-
ratory pathologist was asked to reconsider the Calculation of Incidence: The incidence of neo-
original diagnosis. This procedure has been de- plastic or nonneoplastic lesions is given as the
scribed, in part, by Maronpot and Boorman ratio of the number of animals bearing such le-
(1982) and Boorman et al. (1985). The final di- sions a t a specific anatomic site to the number of
agnoses represent a consensus of contractor pa- animals in which that site was examined. In
thologists and the NTP Pathology Working most instances, the denominators include only
Group. For subsequent analysis of pathology those animals for which the site was examined
data, the diagnosed lesions for each tissue type histologically. However, when macroscopic ex-
are combined according to the guidelines of amination was required to detect lesions (e.g.,
McConnell et al. (1986). skin or mammary tumors) prior to histologic
sampling, or when lesions could have appeared
Slidedtissues are generally not evaluated in a
at multiple sites (e.g., lymphomas), the denomi-
blind fashion (i.e., without knowledge of dose nators consist of the number of animals on which
group) unless the lesions in question are subtle a necropsy was performed.
or unless there is a n inconsistent diagnosis of le-
sions by the laboratory pathologist. Nonneo- Analysis of Tumor Incidence: Three statistical
plastic lesions are not examined routinely by the methods are used to analyze tumor incidence
quality assessment pathologist or PWG unless data. The two that adjust for intercurrent mor-
they are considered part of the toxic effect of the tality employ the classical method for combining
chemical. contingency tables developed by Mantel and
Haenszel (1959). Tests of significance included
pairwise comparisons of high dose and low dose
Statistical Methods groups with vehicle controls and tests for overall
dose-response trends.
Data Recording: Data on this experiment were
recorded in the Carcinogenesis Bioassay Data For studies in which compound administration
System (Linhart et al., 1974). The data elements has little effect on survival, the results of the
include descriptive information on the chemi- three alternative analyses will generally be
cals, animals, experimental design, survival, similar. When differing results are obtained by
body weight, and individual pathology results, the three methods, the final interpretation of the
a s recommended by the International Union data will depend on the extent to which the tu-
Against Cancer (Berenblum, 1989). mor under consideration is regarded as being the
31 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS
cause of death. Continuity-corrected tests are animals in dosed and vehicle control groups
used in the analysis of tumor incidence, and re- were compared in each of five time intervals:
ported P values are one-sided. weeks 0-52, weeks 53-78, weeks 79-92, week 93
to the week before the terminal-kill period, and
Life Table Analysis-The first method of analy- the terminal-kill period. The denominators of
sis assumed that all tumors of a given type ob- these proportions were the number of animals
served in animals dying before the end of the actually examined for tumors during the time
study were “fatal”; i.e., they either directly or in- interval. The individual time interval com-
directly caused the death of the animal. Accord- parisons were then combined by the previously
ing to this approach, the proportions of tumor- described method to obtain a single overall re-
bearing animals in the dosed and vehicle control sult. (See Haseman, 1984, for the computational
groups were compared at each point in time a t details of both methods.)
which an animal died with a tumor of interest.
The denominators of these proportions were the
Unadjusted Analyses--Primarily, survival-ad-
total number of animals at risk in each group.
justed methods are used to evaluate tumor inci-
These results, including the data from animals
dence. In addition, the results of the Fisher
killed at the end of the study, were then com-
exact test for pairwise comparisons and the
bined by the Mantel-Haenszel method to obtain
Cochran-Armitage linear trend test (Armitage,
an overall P value. This method of adjusting for
1971; Gart e t al., 1979) are given in the appen-
intercurrent mortality is the life table method of
dixes containing the analyses of primary tumor
Cox (1972) and of Tarone (1975). The under-
incidence. Thesettwo tests are based on the over-
lying variable considered by this analysis is time
all proportion of &tumor-bearinganimals and do
to death due to tumor. If the tumor is rapidly
not adjust for suru?ival differences.
lethal, then time to death due to tumor closely
approximates time to tumor onset. In this case,
the life table test also provides a comparison of Historical Control Data: Although the concur-
the time-specific tumor incidences. rent control group is always the first and most
appropriate control group used for evaluation,
Incidental Tumor Analysis--The second method there are certain instances in which historical
of analysis assumed that all tumors of a given control data can be helpful in the overall as-
type observed in animals that died before the sessment of tumor incidence. Consequently,
end of the study were “incidental”; i.e., they control tumor incidences from the NTP his-
were merely observed at necropsy in animals torical control data base (Haseman et al., 1984,
dying of an unrelated cause. According to this 1985) are included for those tumors appearing to
approach, the proportions of tumor-bearing show compound-related effects.
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 32
III. RESULTS
RATS
SIXTEEN-DAY STUDIES
THIRTEEN- WEEK STUDIES
TWO-YEAR STUDIES
Body Weights and Clinical Signs
Survival
Pathology and Statistical Anajyses of Results
MICE
SIXTEEN-DAY STUDIES
THIRTEEN-WEEK STUDIES
TWO-YEAR STUDIES
Body Weights and Clinical Signs
Survival
Pathology and Statistical Analyses of Results
33 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
III. RESULTS: RATS
TABLE 7. SURVIVAL AND MEAN BODY WEIGHTS OF RATS IN THE SIXTEEN-DAY GAVAGE
STUDIES OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
MALE
0 (d) 4/5 87 k 1 159 f 4 +72f 3 __
156 515 92 f 2 166 f 8 +74f 10 104
313 515 87 f 1 163 k 3 +76f 3 103
625 (e) 315 87 k 1 171 f 0 +85f 2 108
1,250 515 97 f 1 164 f 3 +67f 3 103
FEMALE
0 515 78 f 1 129 f 1 +51f 2 __
156 515 81 f 1 130 f 3 +49f 2 101
313 (e)415 75 f 1 126 f 1 +51f 1 98
625 515 71 f 1 121 f 1 +50f 1 94
1,250 515 83 f 1 134 f 1 +51f 1 104
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 34
TABLE 8. SURVIVAL AND MEAN BODY WEIGHTS O F RATS IN T H E THIRTEEN-WEEK GAVAGE
STUDIES O F 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
MALE
0 loll0 140 f 2 355 f 6 +215f 6 __
139 f 2 f 3
188
375
750
10110
9/10
10110
136 f 2
141 I3
357
336
342
f 8
F 10
+200
~ *
+218 f 2
- .
.
+201 f 10
8
101
95
96
FEMALE
0 10/10 115 f 2 208 f 5 +93f 5 __
MALE
0 10 355 f 19.1 13,593 f 2,121 38.4 f 6.07
188 10 357 f 8.5 15,661 f 793 (b)43.9 f 1.87
375 9 336 f 23.1 15,861 f 1,712 (d47.2 f 2.79
750 0 342 f 31.5 (c) 18.742 f 2.631 (c) 54.8 f 5.08
1,500 8 (b)325 f 26.8 (c) 161759 f 21660 (c) 51.3 f 5.42
FEMALE
0
188
375
0
9
0
208 f 15.9
200 f 15.6
201 f 11.3
6,606 f
(c)7.818 f
(c)8,027 f
795
814
688
*
31.8 f 3.28
(c)39.3 3.53
(d39.9 f 2.99
750 8 (b1191 f 8.8 (c)7,988 f 591 ( d 4 1 . 8 f 2.81
1,500 10 195 f 12.1 (~18,413f 652 (c)43.2 f 2.61
(a)Mean f standard deviation; P values are versus the vehicle controls by Dunnett’s test (Dunnett, 1955).
(b)P<0.05
(C)P<O.Ol
TWO-YEAR STUDIES
Body Weights and Clinical Signs controls (Table 10 and Figure 5). Mean body
weights of dosed female rats were generally
Mean body weights of dosed male rats were greater (up to 11%) than those of the vehicle con-
similar to or greater than those of the vehicle trols. Rats were lethargic after they were dosed.
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 36
550.0
500.0
450.0
400.0
sso.0
.................
....... 3 0 0 . 0
250.0
200.0
150.0
100.0
0 IS 30 4s 60 IS mo 10s
WEEKS ON STUDY
- 550.0
- 500.0
- 450.0
- 400.0
- S50.0
- 100.0
- 250.0
- 200.0
- 150.0
- 100.0
0 1s so 49 eo 7s 10 5
WEEKS ON STUDY
37 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
III. RESULTS: RATS
MALE (a)
Animals initially in study 50 50 50
Nonaccidental deaths before termination (b) 8 28 29
Accidentally killed 0 0 1
Killed at termination 42 22 20
Survival P values (c) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
FEMALE (a)
Animals initially in study 50 50 50
Nonaccidental deaths before termination (b) 21 18 25
Accidentally killed 1 1 0
Killed at termination 28 31 25
Survival P values (c) 0.535 0.415 0.639
0 8
0.7
!
I
_ ...........................................................
_ ............................................................
I
_ ...........................................................
.........-....... "."............... .
....
u
.........................
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0 6 I
_ ..........................................................
............._....
"^.......
I_.....I ...... ........
0.0
0.5 .................
O == VEHICLE
375 MG/KG
...............
A = 7 5 0 MG/KG
I
r"""'................... .........-I."" ........
I_I_I. ................. 0.)
0.4
0
I I
I
1s
I
D 4s
WEEKS ON STUDY
i 75
I 10s
0.4
1.0 1.0
i
i
I
i
.--.----.
1 '
0.9 .................& .......................... 0.9
4 I:1
J
a
L
> 0.8 ........................ ......
0.8
a
VI
L&
0.7 0.7
>
c- I
J
m
a
...........................
0.s
m 0,s
0
E
a
0.5
............................ ..........
0.s
j
i
I
0.4
I
I
1s
1
30
8
I
1
4s 00
1 i 90
5
0.4
WEEKS ON STUDY
39 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
III. RESULTS: RATS
Hematopoietic System: The incidence of leuke- occurred with significant positive trends; the in-
mia in low dose male rats was significantly cidences of adenomas in low dose males and of
greater than that in the vehicle controls by the adenomas and adenomas or adenocarcinomas
life table test and exceeded the high value for (combined) in high dose females were signifi-
the historical corn oil vehicle control range cantly greater than those in the vehicle controls
(0/50-14/50) (Table 12). (Table 13). The incidence of hyperplasia of the
anterior pituitary was slightly increased in low
Pituitary Gland: Adenomas and adenomas or dose male rats.
adenocarcinomas (combined) in female r a t s
MALE (b)
FEMALE (c)
(a)The statistical analyses used are discussed in Chapter II (Statistical Methods) and Appendix A, Table A3 (footnotes).
(b)Historical incidence ofleukemia in NTP studies (mean f SD): 202/1,450 (14% f 8%)
(c)Historical incidence of leukemia in NTP studies (mean f SD): 271/1,450 (19% f 9%)
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 40
TABLE 13. ANALYSIS OF PITUITARY GLAND LESIONS I N RATS I N THE TWO-YEAR GAVAGE
STUDIES O F 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
MALE
Hyperplasia
Adenoma (a)
FEMALE
Hyperplasia
Adenoma
Adenocarcinoma
(40% f 8%)
MALE
Medullary Hyperplasia
Overall Rates 9/50(18%)
14/50(28%) 10/49(20%)
Pheochromocytoma
Overall Rates 18/50(36%) 25/50(50%) 22/49(45%)
Adjusted Rates 39.8% 70.3% 68.5%
Terminal Rates 15/42(36%) 12/22(55%) 11/20 (55%)
Week of First Observation 93 85 84
Life Table Tests P=0.002 PCO.001 P=0.002
Incidental Tumor Tests P =0.109 P=0.056 P=O.lll
Malignant Pheochromocytoma
Overall Rates 0/50(0%)
2/50(4%) 2/49(4%)
Pheochromocytoma or Malignant Pheochromocytoma (a)
Overall Rates 18/50(36%)
27/50(54%) 24/49(49%)
Adjusted Rates 39.8%
74.1% 75.5%
Terminal Rates 15/42(36%)
13/22(59%) 13/20 (65%)
Week of First Observation 93
85 84
Life Table Tests PCO.001
P co.00 1 PCO.001
Incidental Tumor Tests P=0.038
P=0.021 P=0.034
FEMALE
Medullary Hyperplasia
Overall Rates 5/50(10%)
8/50(16%) 2/50(4%)
Pheochromocytoma (b)
Overall Rates 1150 (2%) 5/50(10%) 6/50(12%)
Adjusted Rates 3.6% 14.6% 23.0%
Terminal Rates 1/28(4%) 3/31(10%) 5/25(20%)
Week of First Observation 104 96 97
Life Table Testa P = 0.030 P=0.137 P=0.041
Incidental Tumor Tests P=0.038 P=0.214 P=0.052
Pancreas: The incidence of acinar cell adenomas primarily by their larger size and abnormal
in low dose male rats was significantly greater growth pattern.
than that in the vehicle controls by the inci-
dental tumor test (Table 15). The incidence of Preputial Gland: Adenomas in male rats oc-
pancreatic acinar cell hyperplasia was also in- curred with a significant positive trend by the
creased in the low dose group. Acinar cell hyper- incidental tumor test, and the incidences of ade-
plasia usually consisted of focal, circumscribed, nomas or carcinomas (combined) in dosed groups
round to oval lesions that slightly compressed were significantly greater than those in the ve-
the surrounding acini. The acinar pattern was hicle controls by the life table tests (Table 16).
prominent, and these a r e a s were clearly The number of tumors for any group did not ex-
demarcated from surrounding acinar tissue. ceed the historical corn oil vehicle control range
Adenomas generally were similar in appearance (0/50-9/50),
to the hyperplasia but were distinguished
Hyperplasia
Overall Rates 5/50(1 0%) 15/50(30%) 7/49(14%)
Adenoma (a)
Overall Rates 2/50(4%) 13/50(26%) 6/49(12%)
(a)Historical incidence of acinar cell neoplasms in NTP studies (mean k SD): 8011,381(6% k 8%)
TABLE 16. ANALYSIS OF PREPUTIAL GLAND LESIONS IN MALE RATS IN THE TWO-YEAR
GAVAGE STUDY OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
Hyperplasia
Overall Rates 0150 (0%) 0150 (0%) 1/50(2%)
Adenoma
Overall Rates 0150(0%) 4/50(8%) 4/50(8%)
Carcinoma (a)
Overall Rates 1/50(2%) 2/50(4%) 1/50(2%)
Adenoma or Carcinoma (b)
Overall Rates 1/50(2%) 6/50(12%) 5/50(10%)
Adjusted Rates 2.2% 18.5% 19.2%
Terminal Rates 0142 (0%) 2/22(9%) 3/20(15%)
Week of First Observation 98 83 87
Life Table Tests P = 0.027 P=O.O21 P=0.030
Incidental Tumor Testa P = 0.094 P = 0.216 P=0.117
Multiple Organs: Mesotheliomas in male rats Subcutaneous Tissue: Fibromas and fibromas,
occurred with a significant positive trend; the in- neurofibromas, sarcomas, or fibrosarcomas
cidences in the dosed groups were not signifi- (combined) in male rats occurred with signifi-
cantly greater than that in the vehicle controls cant positive trends by the life table test but not
(Table 17)and did not exceed the historical corn by the more appropriate incidental tumor test
oil vehicle control range for this neoplasm (0/50- (Table 18).
6/50).
TABLE 17. ANALYSIS O F MESOTHELIOMAS IN MALE RATS IN THE TWO-YEAR GAVAGE STUDY
OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE (a)
TABLE 18. ANALYSIS O F SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE TUMORS IN MALE RATS IN THE TWO-YEAR
Fibroma
Neurofibroma
Sarcoma
Fibrosarcoma
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 44
III. RESULTS: RATS
Kidney: Nephropathy, characterized by tubular tubular cell neoplasms in male F344/N corn oil
degeneration and regeneration, was present in vehicle control rats is 811,448 (0.6%).
all male rats and in more than 75% of the female
Forestomach: Ulcers and inflammation were ob-
rats; a severity grade from minimal to severe (1-
served a t increased incidences in dosed rats, and
4) was recorded for each animal. The mean
epithelial hyperplasia and hyperkeratosis were
severity of nephropathy was increased in dosed
male rats (vehicle control: 2.3 [mild-moderate]; observed at increased incidences in dosed male
and low dose female rats (Table 20).
low dose and high dose: 3.4 [moderate-severe]).
Eye: Retinopathy and cataracts were observed
at increased incidences in low dose rats (retino-
Pelvic epithelial hyperplasia and transitional pathy--male: vehicle control, 0/50; low dose,
cell papillomas or carcinomas and tubular cell 10150; high dose, 0150; female: 1/50; 9/50; 0150;
hyperplasia and tubular cell adenomas were ob- cataracts--male: 1/50; 6/50; OJ50; female: 0150;
served in dosed male rats (Table 19). The his- 8/50; 0/50). Low dose groups were on the top two
torical incidence of transitional cell neoplasms rows of the racks near the fluorescent light
in male F344/N corn oil vehicle control rats is source. The cage racks were not rotated in these
111,448 ( < O . l % ) ; the historical incidence of studies.
TABLE 19. NUMBER OF RATS WITH KIDNEY LESIONS IN THE TWO-YEAR GAVAGE STUDIES OF
2-MERC APTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
Male Female
Sitenesion 0 375 mg/kg 750 mg/kg 0 188 mg/kg 375 mg/kg
No. examined 50 50 49 50 50 50
Kidneylpelvis
Epithelial hyperplasia 0 4 1 1 0 0
Transitional cell papilloma 0 1 1 0 0 0
Transitional cell carcinoma 0 1 0 0 0 0
Kidneyhubule
Focal hyperplasia 0 3 3 1 0 0
Kidney
Tubular cell adenoma 0 1 1 0 0 0
TABLE 20. NUMBER OF RATS WITH FORESTOMACH LESIONS IN THE TWO-YEAR GAVAGE
STUDIES OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
Male Female
Lesion 0 375 mg/kg 750 mg/kg 0 188 mg/kg 375 mg/kg
No. examined 50 50 49 49 50 50
Ulcer 0 5 5 0 3 5
Inflammation 0 11 14 2 4 7
Epithelial hyperplasia 1 12 17 1 4 1
Hyperkeratosis 0 12 17 1 4 1
45 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
III. RESULTS: MICE
TABLE 21. SURVIVAL AND MEAN BODY WEIGHTS O F MICE I N T H E SECOND SIXTEEN-DAY
MALE
0 515 23.2 f 0.8 24.1 f 0.8 +0.9 f 0.8 __
FEMALE
(e)Mean body weight change of the survivors f standard error of the mean
(d)Day of d e a t h 2,2,2,3
(e)Day of death: all 2
(0No data are reported because of the 100% mortality in this group.
TABLE 22. SURVIVAL AND MEAN BODY WEIGHTS O F MICE IN THE THIRTEEN-WEEK GAVAGE
STUDIES O F 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
Dose Survival (a) Initial (b) Final Change (c) to Vehicle Controls
(mgfltg) (percent)
MALE
1,500 (d) 5/10 26.7 f 0.4 35.2 f 1.3 +8.5 f 0.5 95.9
FEMALE
750 (e) 8/10 20.5 f 0.2 26.1 ?: 0.4 +5.5 f 0.4 99.6
(c) Mean body weight change of the survivors f standard error of the mean
(d)Week ofdeath: 1,2,3,4,6
(e)Week of death: 7,8
MALE
(a)Mean f standard deviation; Pvalues are versus the controls by Dunnett’s test (Dunnett, 1955).
(b)P<0.05
(c) P<O.Ol
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 48
TABLE 24. MEAN BODY WEIGHTS AND SURVIVAL OF MICE IN THE TWO-YEAR GAVAGE STUDIES
OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
MALE
0 24.7 50 24.2 98 50 24.7 100 50
1 26.0 50 24.4 94 50 25.5 98 50
2 27.3 50 26.4 97 49 28.4 97 50
3 28.8 50 27.0 97 49 27.0 94 50
4 29.4 50 28.7 98 49 27.8 94 50
5 30.8 50 29.1 97 49 20.2 92 50
0 31.5 50 29.9 95 49 29.1 92 50
7 32.3 50 30.4 94 49 29.0 92 50
8 33.0 50 30.3 92 49 29.5 89 48
9 33.3 50 31.3 94 49 30.1 90 40
10 33.4 so 32.1 98 49 30.8 92 47
11 34.4 50 32.0 95 49 30.9 90 47
12 35.3 50 33.7 95 49 31.7 90 47
10 37.3 50 35.2 94 49 32.9 88 40
21 38.9 50 37.1 95 49 34.3 88 38
25 40.9 so 38.5 94 49 35.8 08 38
29 41.9 50 39.0 93 49 38.0 88 35
33 43.5 50 39.9 92 49 37.7 87 35
37 43.8 50 40.1 93 49 38.8 88 35
42 45.2 so 42.5 94 49 39.3 87 35
48 48.1 50 43.1 93 49 40.9 89 35
51 47.4 50 44.3 94 49 42.6 90 34
55 48.2 49 45.9 95 49 43.9 91 34
59 47.9 49 45.9 98 49 44.3 92 34
64 48.9 49 40.1 96 49 45.8 94 33
68 49.1 48 48.1 98 48 48.8 95 33
72 49.4 48 48.5 98 47 47.1 95 32
77 48.5 47 47.1 97 45 48.4 98 32
81 49.0 47 48.4 99 43 41.5 97 32
85 47.9 45 48.0 100 42 40.8 97 32
90 48.3 42 49.0 101 38 48.4 100 30
94 48.6 40 48.9 101 37 48.9 101 30
98 48.0 39 47.0 99 37 48.8 102 30
102 47.1 38 48.2 102 33 48.7 103 30
FEMALE
0 20.8 50 20.5 99 50 20.9 100 50
1 20.8 50 20.4 90 50 21.1 101 50
2 21.8 50 21.8 101 50 21.8 101 50
3 22.2 50 22.4 101 50 22.4 101 49
4 23.3 50 23.2 100 50 23.0 99 49
5 23.7 50 23.5 99 J0 22.9 97 49
8 24.0 50 23.7 99 50 23.9 100 49
7 23.9 50 24.1 101 50 24.1 101 49
8 24.0 50 24.5 102 50 24.2 101 49
9 24.4 50 24.4 100 50 24.8 101 49
10 25.2 50 24.9 99 50 24.9 99 49
11 28.1 50 25.8 99 50 25.7 98 45
12 28.8 50 28.0 98 50 20.0 98 49
10 27.7 50 27.6 100 50 27.0 97 44
21 29.1 50 28.4 98 50 28.1 91 40
25 30.8 50 30.3 99 50 29.5 90 40
29 30.3 50 31.0 102 50 30.2 100 39
33 31.1 50 31.8 102 50 30.9 99 39
37 32.0 50 33.0 101 50 32.2 99 39
42 34.8 50 33.3 98 50 32.8 94 39
46 35.6 50 34.8 97 50 33.4 94 37
51 37.4 50 38.7 98 50 35.0 94 35
55 39.4 50 38.0 98 50 37.2 94 34
59 39.9 49 39.3 98 50 38.9 91 33
e4 41.3 49 41.1 100 50 40.3 98 31
88 42.5 49 42.3 100 50 40.5 95 31
72 43.3 48 43.2 100 50 41.5 98 31
77 42.8 48 43.5 102 49 41.9 98 29
81 43.3 48 44.9 104 48 42.7 99 27
85 44.0 45 45.2 103 46 42.4 98 27
W 45.4 43 48.7 103 45 43.5 90 27
94 45.3 41 47.3 104 45 44.1 91 27
98 44.5 38 48.2 104 43 43.4 98 25
lo2 44.8 37 46.1 104 40 40.0 104 22
49 2-Mercaptobenzothiaaole,NTP TR 332
- '
j .
I
45.0 .............................. & ...........................
.......... a.... ...........................
I 45.0
40.0
35.0
35.0
30.0 30.0
MALE MICE
25.0 ............................
.....................................................................................
o x 575 MG/KG .................-
VEHICLE
25.0
A = 7 5 0 MG/KG
20.0 0 4-
4 - 15 20.0
50.0 50.0
i
Ij
4 5 0 ..................... I" .......&i ........................... 45.0
j
j
i e
!
40.0 ............................... I ..............
I
.......................................................
:
...............................
i ............
"
40.0
I .. 6~ i
...............
*
n
0
m
Z
35 0
30.0
.1 I
....................................................... "
B 8 BA
I
............................................
!
.......... ........."........-......................................................
1
..............
........................................................
35.0
30.0
4
W i
-
I
I
.......... ....................................................................... =VEHICLE ..............
1 /
25.0 ".I
25.0
20.0 20.0
0 lk 43 60 1 io 1
WEEKS ON STUOY
2-Mercaptobenzothiamle,NTP TR 332 50
III. RESULTS: MICE
MALE (a)
Animals initially in study 50 50 50
Nonaccidental deaths before termination (b) 11 17 14
Animals missing 1 0 0
Accidentally killed 0 0 6
Killed at termination 38 33 30
Survival P values (c) 0.204 0.262 0.254
FEMALE (a)
Animals initially in study 50 50 50
Nonaccidental deaths before termination (b) 13 10 24
Animals missing 0 1 0
Accidentally killed 0 0 4
Killed at termination 35 39 22
Died during termination period 2 0 0
Survival P values (c) 0.002 0.560 0.005
0.9 0.9
J
4
L 0.8 0.8
>
a
3
v)
LL
0 0.7
0.7
cr
2
m
4
m 0.6 0.6
0
a
0.5 ............. p
A=
0.5
1 1 i I
0.4 I I I 1 0.4
30 4s 60 75 90
WEEKS ON STUDY
1.0 1.0
--t
0.9 ..........................
L.I
................................................................................ .........................
............
4
0.9
-J
4
L
>
K
3
v)
LL
0
*
k
J
0.8
0.7
..........................
..........................
..............................................................................
~ -
........................................................
. -
I
~ ~ . ~ t
..... .........a
0. 8
0.7
4
Lk.--.............
2-
m 0.6 ..................................................................................... .........................
0.6
0 I
K
0.4 -M- so 45
WEEKS ON S1 DY
! 1
0.4
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 52
III. RESULTS: MICE
Liver: The incidence of hepatocellular adenomas adenomas or carcinomas (combined) were seen
or carcinomas (combined) in low dose female in 16/49 vehicle control, 21/50 low dose, and
mice was significantly greater than that in the 14/50high dose male mice.
vehicle controls (Table 26). Hepatocellular
Adenoma
Overall Rates 3/50 (6%) 7/49 (14%) 4/50 (8%)
Carcinoma
(a)The statistical analyses used are discussed in Chapter II (Statistical Methods) and Appendix D, Table D3 (footnotes).
(b)Historical incidence in NTP studies (mean f SD): 116/1,489(8% k 6%)
Pituitary Gland: Adenomas and adenomas or significantly lower than that in the vehicle con-
carcinomas (combined) in female mice occurred trols (Table 28).
with significant negative trends, and the inci-
Lung: The incidence of bronchopneumonia in all
dences in the dosed groups were significantly
groups of mice varied from 24% to 49% (male:
lower than those in the vehicle controls (Ta-
vehicle control, 12/49; low dose, 16/50; high dose,
ble 27).
16/50; female: 13/50; 24/49; 18/50). These le-
sions were of minimal to mild severity and con-
Hematopoietic System: Lymphomas in female sistent with those changes seen with viral infec-
mice occurred with a significant negative trend, tions. Serologic titers from sentinel animals
and the incidence in the low dose group was were positive for Sendai virus antibody.
Hyperplasia
Adenoma
Carcinoma
(a)Historical incidence of adenomas or carcinomas (combined) in NTP studies (mean k SD): 257/1,324 (19% f 9%)
(a)Historical incidence of lymphomas or leukemia in NTP studies (mean f SD): 39311,494 (26% k 9%)
55 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
Some of the tumor responses to 2-mercapto- studies, even higher rates of mortality occurred
benzothiazole were comparable to those induced in each of the earlier studies, such that there
by other sulfur-containing chemicals in studies was either early termination of the studies or
evaluated by the NC1 (Griesemer and Cueto, early withdrawal of chemical exposure.
1980) and the NTP (Huff, 1982; Haseman et al.,
Metabolism studies in F344 rats indicated that
1984). Of these chemicals, 2-mercaptobenzothi-
the half-life for 2-mercaptobenzothiazole after
azole has the closest structural resemblance to
administration by gavage was less than 8 hours
4,4'-thiodianiline, When administered in feed,
and possibly as short as 4-6 hours (CMA, 1986a).
4,4'-thiodianiline caused hepatocellular carcino-
Absorption was rapid and unaffected by doses up
mas in male rats and in male and female mice
to 55 mg/kg. The major products of metabolism
(NCI, 1978a), whereas 2-mercaptobenzothiazole
were polar metabolites, a finding in agreement
induced hepatocellular adenomas i n female
with those from earlier dermal absorption stud-
mice. Other responses to thio chemicals com-
ies (Colucci and Buyske, 1965; Nagamatsu et al.,
parable to those induced by 2-mercaptobenzo-
1979) in which glucuronide and sulfate conju-
thiazole in the present studies included leuke-
gates of various proposed metabolites were dem-
mia in male rats induced by intraperitoneal
onstrated. In the CMA gavage study (1986a), 2-
injection of thio-TEPA (NCI, 1978b) and fore-
mercaptobenzothiazole-derived radioactivity in
stomach neoplasms and nephropathy in male
blood decreased very little between 24 and 96
rats after the administration of sulfallate in feed
hours, suggesting that residual 2-mercaptoben-
(NCI, 1978~).
zothiazole-derived material accumulated i n
blood; no data were available for other tissues, so
Neoplasms of the thyroid gland occurred in ani-
the potential accumulation of 2-mercaptobenzo-
mals dosed with the other thio compounds but
thiazole after long-term exposure is unknown.
not after 2-mercaptobenzothiazole exposure.
In a companion study, radiolabeled 2-mercapto-
Thioacetamide, thiourea, and thiouracil a r e
benzothiazole was administered intravenously
structurally similar to 2-mercaptobenzothiazole
to F344 r a t s (CMA, 198613). Whole blood,
and cause neoplasms of the thyroid gland and
plasma, urine, and feces were analyzed for radio-
sometimes the liver (Weisburger and Williams,
activity a t 5 and 15 minutes and a t 1, 2, 4, 24,
1980). For example, NJ'-diethylthiourea,
and 72 hours. Most of the radioactivity (91%-
which is structurally similar to the carcinogen
101%) was excreted in the urine and 4%-8% was
ethylene thiourea (IARC, 1974), caused thyroid
excreted in the feces by 72 hours. A small
gland tumors in rats of each sex when adminis-
amount (1.5%-2%) of the radioactivity remained
tered in feed (NCI, 1979). The mechanism of ac-
in the erythrocytes. The metabolites found in
tion was hypothesized to be interference with
the urine samples were the same as those found
thyroxine synthesis and subsequent stimulation
in the gavage study (CMA, 1986a).
of the pituitary gland-thyroid gland axis, caus-
ing enhanced secretion of thyrotropic hormone 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole was clearly clastogenic
and possible neoplasia of the thyroid gland. Pos- to cultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells
sible explanations for the lack of thyroid gland in the presence of S9 enzymes, inducing aberra-
tumor expression by 2-mercaptobenzothiazole tions at frequencies comparable to and even ex-
are the different route of administration or the ceeding those of the positive control chemical cy-
comparatively lower doses used in the present clophosphamide (Appendix E, Table E4). It also
studies. In the earlier studies, the thio chem- induced sister chromatid exchanges in CHO
icals were all given ad libitum in feed except for cells (Table E3) and thymidine kinase mutants
thio-TEPA, which was injected intraperitoneally in mouse L5178Y lymphoma cells in the pres-
three times per week. 4,4'-Thiodianiline, sulfal- ence of S9 (Table E2). In mouse lymphoma as-
late, and thio-TEPA were administered a t con- says, the frequency of thymidine kinase mutants
centrations high enough to affect the thyroid also was increased in the absence of $39 but only
gland, whereas this organ apparently was not af- a t toxic doses (Litton, 1985). Under these condi-
fected by 2-mercaptobenzothiazole administered tions, some of the mutant colonies produced were
by gavage a t lower concentrations. Although of small size, suggesting that 2-mercaptobenzo-
there was significant mortality in the present thiazole is capable of inducing chromosomal
aberrations in this cell line as well. Although 2- Conclusions: Under the conditions of these 2-
mercaptobenzothiazole is clastogenic in vitro, year gavage studies, there was some evidence of
the only reported study for in vivo mutagenicity, carcinogenic activity* of 2-mercaptobenzothia-
a mouse bone marrow micronucleus test, did not zole for male F344/N rats, indicated by increased
show a n increase in the frequency of micronucle- incidences of mononuclear cell leukemia, pan-
ated polychromatic erythrocytes in these cells creatic acinar cell adenomas, adrenal gland
(Pharmakon, 1984). pheochromocytomas, and preputial gland adeno-
mas or carcinomas (combined). There was some
The experimental and tabulated data for the evidence of carcinogenic activity for female
NTP Technical Report on 2-mercaptobenzothia- F344/N rats, indicated by increased incidences of
zole were examined for accuracy, consistency, adrenal gland pheochromocytomas and pituitary
completeness, and compliance with Good Lab- gland adenomas. There was no evidence of car-
oratory Practice regulations. As summarized in cinogenic activity of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole for
Appendix H, the audit revealed no major prob- male B6C3F1 mice dosed with 375 or 750 mg/kg.
lems with the conduct of the studies or with col- There was equivocal evidence of carcinogenic ac-
lection and documentation of the experimental tivity for female B6C3F1 mice, indicated by in-
data. No discrepancies were found that influ- creased incidences of hepatocellular adenomas
enced the final interpretation of the results of or carcinomas (combined).
these studies.
A summary of the Peer Review commenta and the public discuseion on this Technical Report appears on pages 11-12,
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 58
V. REFERENCES
V. REFERENCES
1. Aleksandrov, S.E. (1982) Effect of vulcanizing 10. Clive, D.; Johnson, K.O.; Spector, J.F.S.;
accelerants on embryolethality in rats. Biull. Batson, A.G.; Brown, M.M.M. (1979) Validation
Eksp. Biol. Med. 93:87-88. and characterization of the L5178Y/TK+’-
mouse lymphoma mutagen assay system. Mu-
2. Armitage, P. (1971) Statistical Methods in tat. Res. 59:61-108.
Medical Research. New York: John Wiley &
Sons Inc., pp. 362-365. 11. Colucci, D.F.; Buyske, D.A. (1965) The bio-
transformation of a sulfonamide to a mercaptan
3. Bauer, M. (1972) The environment and the and to mercapturic acid and glucuronide conju-
woman. Woman Physician 27: 16-20 (abstract). gates. Biochem. Pharmacol. 14:457-466.
4. Berenblum, I . , Ed. (1969) Carcinogenicity 12. Cox, D.R. (1972) Regression models and life
Testing: A Report of the Panel on Carcinogenici- tables. J. R. Stat. SOC.B34:187-220.
ty of the Cancer Research Commission of UICC, 13. Donner, M.; Husgafvel-Pursianinen, K.;
Vol. 2. Geneva: International Union Against Jenssen, D.; Rannug, A. (1983) Mutagenicity of
Cancer. rubber additives and curing fumes: Results from
five short-term bioassays. Scand. J . Work En-
5. Blosczyk, G.; Doemling, H.J. (1982) HPLC de- viron. Health 9(Suppl2):27-37.
termination of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in rub-
ber baby bottle nipples. Lebensmittelchem. 14. Doull, J.; Plzak, V.; Brois, S.J. (1962) A Sur-
Gerichtl. Chem. 36:90 (abstract). vey of Compounds for Radiation Protection.
School of Aerospace Medicine, USAF Aerospace
6. Boorman, G.A.; Montgomery, C.A., Jr.; Eus- Medical Division (AFSC), Brooks Air Force
tis, S.L.; Wolfe, M.J.; McConnell, E.E.; Hardisty, Base, Texas.
J.F. (1985) Quality assurance in pathology for
rodent carcinogenicity studies. Milman, H.; 15. Dunnett, C.W. (1955) A multiple comparison
Weisburger, E., Eds.: Handbook of Carcinogen procedure for comparing several treatments
Testing. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications, with a control. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50:1096-
pp. 345-357. 1122.
7. Chemical Manufacturers Association (CMA) 16. Fisher, A.A. (1973) Contact Dermatitis, 2nd
(1986a) Disposition of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole- ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
ring-UL-14 C and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole di-
sulfide-ring-UL-14 C in Fischer 344 male and fe- 17. Fisher, A.A. (1977) Allergen replacements in
male rats dosed orally. Washington, DC: Chem- allergic dermatitis. Int. J . Dermatol. 16:319-328
ical Manufacturers Association. (abstract).
8. Chemical Manufacturers Association (CMA) 18. Foltinova, P.; Bloeckinger, G. (1970) Anti-
(1986b) Disposition of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole- bacterial effect of 2-mercaptobenzothiazole and
ring-UL-14 C and 2-mercaptobenzothiazole di- its derivatives. Biologia (Bratislava) 25: 175-
sulfide-ring-UL-14 C in Fischer 344 male and fe- 180.
male rats dosed intravenously. Washington,
DC: Chemical Manufacturers Association. 19. Galloway, S.M.; Bloom, A.D.; Resnick, M.;
Margolin, B.H.; Nakamura, F.; Archer, P.;
9. Chiba, T. (1969) Effect of sulfur-containing Zeiger, E. (1985) Development of a standard pro-
compounds on experimental diabetes. VI. tocol for in vitro cytogenetic testing with Chi-
Screening for hypoglycemic action of sulfur-con- nese hamster ovary cells: Comparison of results
taining compounds. Yakugaku Zasshi 89:1138- for 22 compounds in two laboratories. Environ.
1143. Mutagen. 7:l-51.
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 60
V. REFERENCES
20. Gart, J.J.; Chu, K.C.; Tarone, R.E. (1979) 29. Haseman, J.K.; Huff, J.; Rao, G.N.; Arnold,
Statistical issues in interpretation of chronic J.; Boorman, G.A.; McConnell, E.E. (1985) Neo-
bioassay tests for carcinogenicity. J. Natl. plasms observed in untreated and corn oil ga-
Cancer Inst. 62:957-974. vage control groups of F344/N r a t s a n d
(C57BU6N X C3H/HeN)F1 (B6C3F1) mice. J.
21. Goodwin, B.F.; Crevel, R.W.; Johnson, A.W. Natl. Cancer Inst. 75975-984.
(1981) A comparison of three guinea-pig sensiti-
zation procedures for the detection of 19 reported 30. Hawley, G.G. (1981) The Condensed Chemi-
human contact sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis cal Dictionary, 10th ed. New York: Van Nos-
7:248-258. trand Reinhold Company, p. 652.
22. Grassetti, D.R.; Murray, J.F., Jr.; Brokke, 31. Haworth, S.; Lawlor, T.; Mortelmans, K.;
M.E.; Gutman, A.D. (1970) The effect of some Speck, W.; Zeiger, E. (1983) Salmonella muta-
heterocyclic disulfides and thiones on the carbo- genicity test results for 250 chemicals. Environ.
hydrate metabolism of Ehrlich ascites tumor. J. Mutagen. Suppl. 1:3-142.
Med. Chem. 13:273-276.
32. Hinderer, R.K.; Myhr, B.; Jagannath, D.R.;
23. Griesemer, R.; Cueto, C. (1980) Toward a
Galloway, S.M.; Mann, S.W.; Riddle, J.C.;
classification scheme for degrees of experi-
Brusick, D.J. (1983) Mutagenic evaluations of
mental evidence for the carcinogenicity of chem-
four rubber accelerators in a battery of in vitro
icals for animals. Montesano, R.; Bartsch, H.;
mutagenic assays. Environ. Mutagen. 5:193-
Tomatis, L., Eds.: Molecular and Cellular As-
215.
pects of Carcinogen Screening Tests. Lyon:
IARC Scientific Publications 27:259-281.
33. Huff, J.E. (1982) Carcinogenesis bioassay re-
24. Guess, W.L.; O'Leary, R.K. (1969) Toxicity of sults from the National Toxicology Program.
a rubber accelerator. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. Environ. Health Perspect. 445185-198.
14~221-231.
34. Innes, J.R.M,; Ulland, B.M.; Valerio, M.G.;
25. Hansch, C.; Leo, A. (1979) Substituent Con- Petrucelli, L.; Fishbein, L.; Hart, E.R.; Pallotta,
stants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry A.J.; Bates, R.R.; Falk, H.L.; Gart, J.J.; Klein,
and Biology. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. M.; Mitchell, I.; Peters, J. (1969) Bioassay of pes-
ticides and industrial chemicals for tumori-
26. Hardin, B.D.; Bond, G.P.; Sikov, M.R.; genicity in mice: A preliminary note. J. Natl.
Andrew, F.D.; Beliles, R.P.; Niemeir, R.W. Cancer Inst. 42:1 101- 1 1 14.
(1981) Testing of selected workplace chemicals
for teratogenic potential. Scand. J. Work. En- 35. International Agency for Research on Cancer
viron. Health 7(Suppl.4):66-75. (IARC) (1974) IARC Monographs on Evaluation
of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Some
27. Haseman, J.K.(1984) Statistical issues in Anti-Thyroid and Related Substances, Nitro-
the design, analysis and interpretation of ani- furans and Industrial Chemicals, Vol. 7. Lyon:
mal carcinogenicity studies. Environ. Health World Health Organization. 326 p.
Perspect. 58:385-392.
36. Ito, M.; Miyagawa, T.; Asayama, M.; Ogawa,
28. Haseman, J.K.; Huff, J.; Boorman, G.A. T. (1979) Solubility of organic compounds used
(1984) Use of historical control data in carcino- for household articles in human sweat. Aichi
genicity studies in rodents. Toxicol. Pathol. Ika Daigaku Igakkai Zasshi 7:183-189
12:126-135. (abstract).
61 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
V. REFERENCES
37. Johnson, G.A.; Boukma, S.J.; Platz, P.A. 48. Monsanto Co. (1982) Unpublished Informa-
(1970) 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole, a n inhibitor of tion on the Production, Uses, Toxicity, Environ-
dopamine beta-hydroxylase. J. Pharm. Pharma- mental Releases, and Aquatic Toxicity of MBT
col. 22:710-712. and Sodium MBT. Submitted by J.R. Condray,
Monsanto Co., July 16.
38. Kaplan, E.L.; Meier, P. (1958) Nonpara-
metric estimation of incomplete observations. J. 49. Myhr, B.; Bowers, L.; Caspary, W.J. (1985)
Am. Stat. Assoc. 53:457-481. Assays for the induction of gene mutations a t
the thymidine kinase locus in L5178Y mouse
39. Kirk-Othmer (1982) Kirk-Othmer Encyclo- lymphoma cells in culture. Prog. Mutat. Res.
pedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed., Vol. 20. 5:555-568.
New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., pp. 338,350-
351. 50. Nagamatsu, K.; Kido, Y.; Urakubo, G.; Aida,
Y.; Ikeda, Y.; Suzuki, Y. (1979) Absorption, dis-
40. Lehman, A.J. (1965) Mercaptobenzothiazole.
tribution, excretion and metabolism of 2-mer-
Summaries of Pesticide Toxicity. Topeka, KS:
captobenzothiazole in guinea pig. Eisei Kagaku
The Association of Food and Drug Officials of the
25:59-65.
United States, pp. 90-91.
41. Linhart, M.S.; Cooper, J.; Martin, R.L.; Page, 51. National Cancer Institute (NCI) (1976)
N.; Peters, J. (1974) Carcinogenesis Bioassay Guidelines for Carcinogen Bioassay in Small Ro-
Data System. Comput. Biomed. Res. 7:230-248. dents. NC1 Technical Report No. 1. U.S. De-
partment of Health, Education, and Welfare,
42. Litton Bionetics, Inc. (1985) Report to the Public Health Service, National Institutes of
Chemical Manufacturers Association. Mouse Health.
Lymphoma Assay.
52. National Cancer Institute (NCI) (1978a) Bio-
43. Litvinchuk, M.D. (1963) Biological tests of 2- assay of 4,4’-Thiodianiline for Possible Carcino-
mercaptobenzothiazole, rubber vulcanization ac- genicity. NC1 Technical Report No. 47. U.S.
celerator. Farmacol. Toksikol. 26:484-488. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare,
Public Health Service, National Institutes of
44. Mantel, N.; Haenszel, W. (1959) Statistical Health. 106 p.
aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective
studies of disease. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 22:719- 53. National Cancer Institute (NCI) (1978b) Bio-
748. assay of Thio-TEPA for Possible Carcinogenici-
ty. NC1 Technical Report No. 58. U.S. Depart-
45. Maronpot, R.R.; Boorman, G.A. (1982) Inter- ment of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public
pretation of rodent hepatocellular proliferative Health Service, National Institutes of Health.
alterations and hepatocellular tumors in chemi- 168 p.
cal safety assessment. Toxicol. Pathol. 10:71-80.
54. National Cancer Institute (NCI) ( 1 9 7 8 ~Bio-
)
46. Maurer, T.; Thomann, P.; Weirich, E.G.; assay of Sulfallate for Possible Carcinogenicity.
Hess, R. (1979) Predictive evaluation in animals NC1 Technical Report No. 115. U.S. Department
of the contact allergenic potential of medically of Health, Education, a n d Welfare, Public
important substances. II. Comparison of dif- Health Service, National Institutes of Health.
ferent methods of cutaneous sensitization with 62 p.
“weak” allergens. Contact Dermatitis 5:l-10.
55. National Cancer Institute (NC11 (1979) Bio-
47. McConnell, E.E.; Solleveld, H.A.; Swenberg, assay of N,N’-Diethylthiourea for Possible Car-
J.A.; Boorman, G.A. (1986) Guidelines for com- cinogenicity. NC1 Technical Report No. 149.
bining neoplasms for evaluation of rodent car- U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Wel-
cinogenesis studies. J . Natl. Cancer Inst. fare, Public Health Service, National Institutes
76:283-289. of Health.
56. National Institutes of Health (NIH) (1978) 64. U.S. International T r a d e Commission
Open Formula Rat and Mouse Ration (NIH-07). (USITC) (1983) Imports of Benzenoid Chemicals
Specification NIH-11-1335. U.S. Department of and Products, 1982. USITC Publication No.
Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health 1401. Washington, DC: Government Printing
Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Office.
MD.
65. U.S. International T r a d e Commission
57. Petersen, M.C.; Vine, J.H.; Ashley, J.J.; (USITC) (1985) Synthetic Organic Chemicals,
Nation, R.L. (1981) Leaching of a contaminant United States Production a n d Sales 1984.
into the contents of disposable syringes. Aust. USITC Publication No. 1745. Washington, DC:
N.Z. J. Med. 11:208-209. Government Printing Office.
58. Pharmakon Research International, Inc. 66. Vanderbilt (1975) in Santodonato, J.; Davis,
(1984) Report to the Chemical Manufacturers L.N.; Howard, P.H.; Saxena, J. (1976) Investiga-
Association. tion of Selected Potential Environmental Con-
taminants: Mercap tobenzothiazoles. E PA-
59. Santodonato, J.; Davis, L.N.; Howard, P.H.; 56012-76-006. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Research
Saxena, J. (1976) Investigation of Selected Po- Corp. 160 p.
tential Environmental Contaminants: Mercap-
tobenzothiazoles. EPA-56012-76-006, Syracuse, 67. Vorob’eva and Mezentsera (1968) in San-
NY: Syracuse Research Corp. 160 p. todonato, J.; Davis, L.N.; Howard, P.H.; Saxena,
J. (1976) Investigation of Selected Potential En-
60. Stinson, S.C. (1983) Rubber-processing vironmental Contaminants: Mercaptobenzo-
chemicals recover after 20-year low. Chem. Eng. thiazoles. EPA-56012-76-006. Syracuse, NY:
News, April 25, pp. 23-40. Syracuse Research Corp. 160 p.
61. Szybalski, W. (1958) Special microbiological 68. Weisburger, J.H.; Williams, G.H. (1980)
systems. II. Observations on chemical muta- Chemical carcinogens. Doull, J.; Klasson, C.D.;
genesis in microorganisms. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. Amdur, M.O., Eds.: Casarett and DouZZ’s Toxi-
76:475-489. cology. The Basic Science of Poisons, 2nd ed.
New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., pp.
62. Tarone, R. (1975) Tests for trend in life table 102-103.
analysis. Biometrika 62:679-682.
$9. Zeiger, E.; Anderson, B.; Haworth, S.;
63. Uniroyal Chemical (1975) Product Safety Lawlor, T.; Mortelmans, K.; Speck, W. (1987)
Data Sheet on NaMBT and MBT dated 6/15/75, Salmonella mutagenicity tests. III. Results
submitted by R.J.Dowling of Uniroyal Chemical from the testing of 255 chemicals. Environ. Mu-
on June 30,1982. tagen. 9(Supp1.9):1-110.
63 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
2-Mercaptobenaothiazole,NTP TR 332 64
APPENDIX A
2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
PAGE
TABLE A4b HISTORICAL INCIDENCE OF PITUITARY GLAND TUMORS IN MALE F344/N RATS
ADMINISTERED CORN OIL BY GAVAGE 80
TABLE A4c HISTORICAL INCIDENCE OF ADRENAL GLAND TUMORS IN MALE F344/N RATS
ADMINISTERED CORN OIL BY GAVAGE 81
TABLE A4e HISTORICAL INCIDENCE OF PREPUTIAL GLAND TUMORS IN MALE F344/N RATS
ADMINISTERED CORN OIL BY GAVAGE 82
INTEGUMENTARY SYSTEM
+Skin
(50) (50)
Squamous cell papilloma
2 (4%) 2 (4%)
Squamous cell carcinoma
1 (2%)
Basal cell tumor
Keratoacanthoma
2 (4%) 1 (2%)
*Subcutaneoustissue (50) (50)
Sarcoma, NOS 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Fibroma 3 (6%) 6 (12%)
Fibrosarcoma 1 (2%)
Fibrous histiocytoma, malignant 1 (2%)
Lipoma
Neurofibroma 1 (2%)
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
#Lung (50) (50) (50)
Alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
C-cell carcinoma, metastatic 1 (2%)
Mucinous adenocarcinoma 1 (2%)
Pheochromocytoma, metastatic 1 (2%)
HEMATOPOIETIC SYSTEM
*Multiple organs (50) (50) (50)
Leukemia, mononuclear cell 7 (14%) 16 (32%) 3 (6%)
#Spleen (50) (50) (49)
Sarcoma, NOS 1 (2%)
#Thymus (50) (49) (48)
Thymoma, benign 1 (2%)
CIRCULATORY SYSTEM
#Spleen (50) (50) (49)
Hemangiosarcoma 1 (2%)
#Heart (50) (50) (50)
Pheochromocytoma, metastatic 1 (2%)
Neurilemoma, malignant 1 (2%)
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
#Liver (50) (50) (50)
Neoplastic nodule 3 (6%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Mixed hepato/cholangio carcinoma 1 (2%)
#Pancreas
(50) (50) (49)
Acinar cell adenoma
2 (4%) 13 (26%) 6 (12%)
#Duodenum
(50) (50) (49)
Leiomyosarcoma
1 (2%)
67 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
TABLE A l . SUMMARY OF THE INCIDENCE OF NEOPLASMS IN MALE RATS IN THE TWO-YEAR
GAVAGE STUDY OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE (Continued)
URINARY SYSTEM
#Kidney (50) (50) (49)
Transitional cell carcinoma 1 (2%)
Tubular cell adenoma 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
#Kidney/pelvis (50) (50) (49)
Transitional cell papilloma 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Leiomyosarcoma 1 (2%)
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
#Pituitary intermedia (50) (50) (48)
Adenoma, NOS 1 (2%)
#Anterior pituitary (50) (50) (48)
Adenoma, NOS 14 (28%) 21 (42%) 12 (25%)
#Adrenal (50) (50) (49)
Cortical adenoma 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
#Adrenal medulla (50) (50) (49)
Pheochromocytoma 18 (36%) 25 (50%) 22 (45%)
Pheochromocytoma, malignant 2 (4%) 2 (4%)
#Thyroid (50) (50) (50)
Follicular cell adenoma 1 (2%)
Follicular cell carcinoma 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
C-cell adenoma 2 (4%) 3 (6%) 1 (2%)
C-cell carcinoma 5 (10%) 2 (4%)
#Pancreatic islets (50) (50) (49)
Islet cell adenoma 4 (8%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Islet cell carcinoma 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM
*Mammary gland (50) (50) (50)
Fibroadenoma 2 (4%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
*Preputial gland (50) (50) (50)
Carcinoma, NOS 1 (2%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Adenoma, NOS 4 (8%) 4 (8%)
#Testis (50) (50) (50)
Interstitial cell tumor 48 (96%) 48 (96%) 48 (96%)
Pheochromocytoma, metastatic 1 (2%)
#Tunica albuginea (50) (50) (50)
Mesothelioma, NOS 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
NERVOUS SYSTEM
#Brain (50) (50)
Astrocytoma 1 (2%)
Oligodendroglioma 1 (2%)
MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM
None
BODY CAVITIES
*Mesentery (50) (50) (50)
Pheochromocytoma, invasive 1 (2%)
TUMOR SUMMARY
Total animals with primary tumors** 49 50 48
Total primary tumors 123 169 125
Total animals with benign tumors 49 50 48
Total benign tumors 100 131 107
Total animals with malignant tumors 19 27 15
Total malignant tumors 20 35 16
Total animals with secondary tumors## 1 1
Total secondary tumors 1 4
Total animals with tumors uncertain--
benign or malignant 3 3 2
Total uncertain tumors 3 3 2
* Number of animals receiving complete necropsy examinations; all gross lesions including masses examined microscopically.
** Primary tumors: all tumors except secondary tumors
# Number of animals examined microscopically a t this site
# # Secondary tumors: metastatic tumors or tumors invasive into an adjacent organ
NUMBER
WEEKS ON
STUDY
Skin
Squamous cell papilloma
Sauamous mll carcinoma
~ k acell
l tumor
Keratoacanthoma
Subcutaneous tissue
Fibroma
Fibrosarcoma
Lipoma
Bone marrow
Soleen
ymoma, benign
Heart
M
Salivary gland
Liver
Neoplastic nodule
Bile duct
Pancreas
Acinar cell adenorna
&eY
Small intestine
Large intestine
Kidney
Kidney/pelvis
Leiomyosarcoma
Urinary bladder
Pituitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Menoma. NOS X X X X X X
k + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Pheochmmocytoma X X X X X X X X X X
Thyroid C + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Follicular cell carcinoma
C-cell adenoma
Ccell carcinoma
Parathyroid
Pancreatic islets
Islet cell adenoma
Islet cell carcinoma
M
Mammary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fibroadenoma
Testls
- --- - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PreputiaUclitoral gland I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Carcinoma. NOS X
Brain
ALL P
Multiple organs, NOS I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Sarcoma. NOS X
Leukemia. mononuclear cell X X X X
Skin
Squamous cell papilloma
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * 50
1
Squamous cell carcinoma X 1
Basal cell tumor X 2
Keratoacanthoma 1
Subcutaneous tissue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '50
Fibroma 2
Fibrosarcoma 1
Lipoma 1
Bone marrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Spleen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
L mphnodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
T$ys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
ymoma, benign X 1
Heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
~
Salivary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Liver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Neoplastic nodule X 3
Bile duct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Pancreas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Acinar cell adenoma 2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
E%,,
Small intestine
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
50
50
50
Large intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Kidney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Kidneylpelvis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Leiomyosarcoma X 1
Urinary bladder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
~~ ~~
Pituitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Adenoma, NOS X x x x x x x x 14
Adrenal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Pheochromocytoma x x x X x x x X 18
Thyroid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Follicular cell carcinoma 1
C-cell adenoma 2
C m l l carcinoma
Parathyroid . . . . . . . .X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . . X 5
41
Pancreatic islets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Islet cell adenoma X X 4
Islet cell carcinoma 1
Brain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
ALL UTs-
Multiple organs, NOS N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N *50
Sarcoma, NOS 1
Leukemia, mononuclear cell X X 7
* Animals necropsied
5 1 3 3 7 6 8 2 9 6 3 0 0 8 9 5 1 8 5 9 2 1 0 0 7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0
8 8 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 8 8 9 1 2 2 3 8 8 9 9 9 0 0 0 1
Skin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Squamous cell papilloma
Keratoacanthoma x x
Subcutaneous tissue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sarcoma, NOS X
Fibroma X X
Fibrosarcoma X
Neurofibroma
Alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma X
Alveolar/bronchiolar Carcinoma
Trachea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bone marrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Spleen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sarcoma, NOS X
Hemangiosarcoma x
L mphnodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tgymua . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Neunlemoma, malignant
X I
Salivary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Neoplastic nodule X
Bile duct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pancreas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
:;?ax=
Small intestine
.
t
.
+
.
+
.
+
.
+
.
+
.
+
.
t
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + +
Leiomyosarcoma
Large intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kidney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .X . . . . . . . . . . .
Kidneylpelvis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unnary bladder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M
Pituitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adenoma, NOS X x x x x x x x x x X
Adrenal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cortical adenoma
Pheochromocytoma X x x x x x x x x X
Pheochromocytoma, malignant X
Thyroid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C cell adenoma
C-cell carcinoma X
Parathyroid + + + + + + + t - - - + t - + - + - + + + + + + +
Pancreatic islets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mammary gland N N + + + N N + + N + + + N + + + + + + + + + + +
Fibroadenoma X
Testis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mesothelioma, NOS
Prostate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preputiaklitoral gland N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Carcinoma, NOS X X
Adenoma. NOS X
Brain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
E ORGANS
Zymbal gland N N N N N N N N N + N N N N N N N N N N N + N N N
Carcinoma, NOS X
S
Multiple organs, NOS N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
TABLE A2. INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL TUMOR PATHOLOGY OF MALE RATS: LOW DOSE
(Continued)
ANIMAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NUMBER 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4
9 1 4 2 3 4 6 7 9 2 4 5 7 8 0 1 2 8 3 4 5 6 7 4 6
TOTAL:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TISSUES
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUMORS
1 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
-I
Skin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $50
Keratoacanthoma 2
Sarcoma. NOS 1
Fibroma X 3
Fibrosarcoma 1
Neurofibroma X 1
Alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma 1
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma X 1
Trachea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Bone marrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Spleen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Sarcoma, NOS 1
Hemang-iosarcoma 1
Lymph nodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Thymus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
-I
Heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Neunlemoma, malignant
Salivary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Neoplastic nodule X
Bile duct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Pancreas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
%
::;Small
:Y intestine .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. . 50
50
Leiomyosarcoma X 1
Large intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Kidney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Kidne yipelvis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Unnary bladder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Pituitary
Adenoma, NOS
Adrenal
Cortical adenoma
I
.
.
.
.
. . . .
x
. . . .
.
x
.
.
.
x
. . . . . . . . .
x X x x
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
x @X x
. . . . . . . .
x
-I
50
21
50
Pheochromocytoma x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
Pheochromocytoma, malignant X
Thyroid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C cell carcinoma X 2
Parathyroid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Pancreatic islets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Mammary gland
Fibroadenoma
I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 '50
1
Testis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Mesothelioma, NOS X I 1
Prostate
Preputialiclitoral gland
Carcinoma. NOS
Adenoma, NOS X X X 4
I
-I
Brain
m I A L SENSE ORGANS
Zymbal gland
Carcinoma, NOS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
-I 50
'50
I i
ALL OTAFKSPSTEMS
Multiple organs, NOS
* Animals necropsied
TABLE A2. INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL TUMOR PATHOLOGY OF MALE RATS IN THE TWO-YEAR GAVAGE
STUDY OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE:HIGH DOSE
ANIMAL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NUMBER 0 7 5 8 7 9 6 8 7 6 9 9 5 7 6 6 9 6 7 7 5 5 7 9 5
0 4 1 8 5 6 0 2 0 5 9 4 7 2 1 0 1 8 9 1 4 5 3 7 9
WEEKS ON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1
STUDY 5 5 6 6 6 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0
7 9 2 6 8 4 2 2 4 7 1 4 5 5 6 6 6 8 8 9 0 0 0 0 1
M
Skin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sarcoma, NOS X
Fibroma X X X X
Mucinous adenocarcinoma
Pheochromocytoma, metastatic
Trachea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bone marrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Spleen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L mphnodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Txymus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pheochromocytoma, metastatic
Salivary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Neoplastic nodule
Bile duct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pancreas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
?:a
;Y
: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Small intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Large intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kidney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pituitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adenoma, NOS x x X x x x
Adrenal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cortical adenoma
Pheochromocytoma X x x x x x x x x x
Pheochromocytoma, malignant
Thyroid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C cell adenoma
Parathyroid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pancreatic islets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mammary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fibroadenoma
Testis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Zymbal gland i N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Carcinoma, NOS
Mesentery T N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Pheochromocytoma, invasive
8 2 6 2 5 2 3 6 8 3 4 6 7 9 7 8 1 3 4 5 6 7 9 0 3
WEEKS ON 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Skin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '50
Keratoacanthoma 1
S a m m a . NOS 1
Fibmma X X 6
LungJand bronchi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Munnous adenocarcinoma X 1
Pheochromocytoma. metastatic X 1
Trachea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Bone marrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Spleen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
L mphnodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Tgymus + + - + + - + + + + + t + + t + + + + + + t +48
+ +
Heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Pheochromocytoma, metastatic X 1
Salivary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Liver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Neoplastic nodule X 1
M u d hepatolcholangio carcinoma X 1
Bile duct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Pancreas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Eo:%Y
Small intestine
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
49
49
Large intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
EM
Kidney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Kidneylpelvis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Urinary bladder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Pituitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Adenoma, NOS X x x x X X 12
Adrenal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Cortical adenoma X 1
Pheochromocytoma x x x x x x x x x x x X 22
Pheochromocytoma, malignant X X 2
Th mid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . so
dr,11adenoma X
Parathyroid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Pancreatic islets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Fibroadenoma X
Testis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
+
N
t
N
+
N N
+
N
+
N
+
N
+
N
X
+
N
+
N N
+
N
+
N
+
N
t
N
+
N
t
N
+
X
N
+
N
+
N
+
N
X
+
N N
+
N
+
N
+
*i
+ +
1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
N N + N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N *50
X 1
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N '50
X 1
* Animals necropsied
TABLE A3. ANALYSIS O F PRIMARY TUMORS IN MALE RATS I N THE TWO-YEAR GAVAGE STUDY
OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
Overall Historical Incidence
SD (b) 7.55%
Range (c)
High 14/50
LOW 1/50
TABLE A4b. HISTORICAL INCIDENCE OF PITUITARY GLAND TUMORS I N MALE F344/N RATS
ADMINISTERED CORN OIL BY GAVAGE (a)
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
Overall Historical Incidence
Range (e)
High 19/50 4/47 22/50
LOW 5/50 0150 6/50
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 80
TABLE A4c. HISTORICAL INCIDENCE O F ADRENAL GLAND TUMORS IN MALE F344/N RATS
ADMINISTERED CORN OIL BY GAVAGE (a)
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
Range (c)
High 20149 2150 20149
LOW 2150 0150 2/50
TABLE A4d. HISTORICAL INCIDENCE OF PANCREATIC ACINAR CELL TUMORS IN MALE F344/N
RATS ADMINISTERED CORN OIL BY GAVAGE (a)
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
TOTAL (b)8011,381(5.8%)
SD (c) 8.00%
Range (d)
High 14/50
LOW 0150
(a)Data as of August 30,1985, for studies of a t least 104 weeks, An incidence of 22/50 for the benzyl acetate study for which
multiple sections were examined has been deleted.
(b)Includes two carcinomas
(c)Standard deviation
(d)Range and SD are presented for groups of 35 or more animals.
81 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
TABLE A4e. HISTORICAL INCIDENCE O F PREPUTIAL GLAND TUMORS IN MALE F344/N RATS
ADMINISTERED CORN OIL BY GAVAGE (a)
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
(4.5%)
SD (c) 3.27% 2.53% 4.33%
Range (d)
High 7/50 5/50 9/50
Low 0/50 0/50 0150
TABLE A4f. HISTORICAL INCIDENCE O F SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE TUMORS I N MALE F344/N RATS
ADMINISTERED CORN OIL BY GAVAGE (a)
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
Range (e)
High 6/50 6/50 8/50
Low 0/50 0150 1/50
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 82
TABLE A4g. HISTORICAL INCIDENCE O F MESOTHELIAL TUMORS IN MALE F344/N RATS
ADMINISTERED CORN OIL BY GAVAGE (a)
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
Overall Historical Incidence
Range (c)
High 6150 2150 6150
Low 0150 0150 0150
TABLE A4h. HISTORICAL INCIDENCE O F KIDNEY TUMORS I N MALE F344/N RATS ADMINISTERED
CORN OIL BY GAVAGE (a)
~~~ ~ ~~
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
Overall Historical Incidence
No. Examined No. of T u m o r s Diagnosis
INTEGUMENTARY SYSTEM
"Skin (50)
Mineralization
*Subcutaneous tissue (50)
Ulcer, NOS
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
*Nasal cavity (50) (50)
Hemorrhage (4%) 2 (4%)
Inflammation, acute (2%) 1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic (2%) 6 (12%) 1 (2%)
Foreign material, NOS 1 (2%)
*Nasal turbinate (50) (50)
Inflammation, active chronic 2 (4%)
Inflammation, chronic 2 (4%) 4 (8%)
#Lung (50) (50) (50)
Mineralization 1 (2%)
Congestion, NOS 6 6 (12%) 3 (6%)
Edema, NOS 1 (2%)
Hemorrhage 6 (12%) 9 (18%)
Pneumonia, interstitial chronic 1 (2%) 5 (10%)
Bronchopneumonia, chronic 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
Granuloma, NOS 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, alveolar epithelium 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Histiocytosis 2 (4%) 4 (8%)
HEMATOPOIETIC SYSTEM
#Bone marrow (50) (50) (48)
Hemorrhage 1 (2%)
Fibrosis 3 (6%) 2 (4%)
Necrosis, NOS 2 (4%)
Hyperplasia, megakaryocytic 2 (4%)
#Spleen (50) (50) (49)
Fibrosis 3 (6%) 7 (14%) 7 (14%)
Pigmentation, NOS 44 (88%) 39 (78%) 46 (94%)
Atrophy, NOS 3 (6%)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid 2 (4%) 3 (6%)
Hematopoiesis 44 (88%) 41 (82%) 43 (88%)
#Splenic capsule (50) (50) (49)
Fibrosis 1 (2%)
#Lymph node (50) (50) (50)
Cyst, NOS 1 (2%)
#Mandibular lymph node (50) (50) (50)
Cyst, NOS 1 (2%)
Plasmacytosis 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid 8 (16%) 12 (24%) 3 (6%)
#Mesenteric lymph node (50) (50) (50)
Congestion, NOS 1 (2%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, reticulum cell 1 (2%)
#Liver (50) (50) (50)
Hematopoiesis 2 (4%) 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
CIRCULATORY SYSTEM
*Multiple organs (50)
Periarteritis
#Heart
(50)
Mineralization
1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic
46 (92%)
#Heart/atrium
(50)
Dilatation, NOS
1 (2%)
Thrombus, organized
*Pulmonary artery
(50)
(50)
Mineralization
3 (6%)
8 (16%)
*Pulmonary vein
(50)
(50)
Mineralization
1 (2%)
1 (2%)
#Pancreas
(50)
(49)
Periarteritis
1 (2%) 5 (10%)
*Mesentery
(50) (50)
Periarteritis
1 (2%)
#Testis
(50) (50)
Periarteritis
1 (2%)
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
*Lip (50) (50) (50)
Inflammation, chronic 1 (2%)
*Tongue (50) (50)
(50)
Epidermal inclusion cyst 1 (2%)
#Salivary gland
(50)
(50)
(50)
Mineralization
1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic
1 (2%)
Atrophy, NOS
1 (2%) 5 (10%)
#Liver
(50) (50)
Accessory structure
1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic
1 (2%)
Granuloma, NOS
2 (4%)
2 (4%)
Necrosis, NOS
1 (2%)
2 (4%)
Metamorphosis, fatty
6 (12%)
4 (8%)
2 (4%)
Cytoplasmic vacuolization
3 (6%)
4 (8%)
2 (4%)
Hepatocytomegaly
1 (2%)
2 (4%)
Hyperplasia, NOS
2 (4%)
2 (4%)
Angiectasis
1 (2%)
#Hepatic capsule
(50) (50)
Mineralization
#Liver/centrilobular
(50) (50)
Metamorphosis, fatty
2 (4%)
Cytoplasmic vacuolization
1 (2%) 1 (2%)
#Liver/periportal
(50) (50)
(50)
Inflammation, chronic
45 (90%) 46 (92%) 36 (72%)
Metamorphosis, fatty
5 (10%) 3 (6%)
Cytoplasmic vacuolization
1 (2%) 1 (2%)
#Bile duct
(50) (50) (50)
Multiple cysts
1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, NOS
46 (92%) 49 (98%) 47 (94%)
URINARY SYSTEM
#Kidney (50) (50) (49)
Hemorrhage 1 (2%)
Nephropathy 50 (100%) 50 (100%) 49 (100%)
#Kidney/cortex (50) (50) (49)
Cyst, NOS 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
# Kidneykubule (50) (50) (49)
Mineralization 25 (50%) 24 (48%) 33 (67%)
Multiple cysts 1 (2%)
Inflammation, acute 2 (4%)
Pigmentation, NOS 46 (92%) 49 (98%) 42 (86%)
Hyperplasia, focal 3 (6%) 3 (6%)
#Kidney/pelvis (50) (50) (49)
Calculus, microscopic examination 2 (4%) 2 (4%)
Hemorrhage 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Inflammation, acute 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, epithelial 4 (8%) 1 (2%)
#Urinary bladder (50) (49) (49)
Calculus, gross observation only 1 (2%)
Inflammation, hemorrhagic 1 (2%)
Inflammation, active chronic 1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic 1 (2%)
*Urethra (50) (50) (50)
Calculus, microscopic examination 1 (2%) 3 (6%) 2 (4%)
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
#Pituitary intermedia (50) (50) (48)
Cyst, NOS 3 (6%) 2 (4%)
Multiple cysts 1 (2%)
#Anterior pituitary (50) (50) (48)
Cyst, NOS 6 (12%) 5 (10%) 3 (6%)
Multiple cysts 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Hemorrhage 1 (2%)
Focal cellular change 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, NOS 10 (20%) 17 (34%) 12 (25%)
Cytoplasmic vacuolization
1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, NOS
7 (14%) 10 (20%)
5 (10%)
Angiectasis
1 (2%)
#Adrenal medulla
(50) (50) (49)
Hyperplasia, NOS
9 (18%) 14 (28%) 10 (20%)
#Thyroid
(50)
(50) (50)
Mineralization
2 (4%)
Cystic follicles
6 (12%) 8 (16%) 12 (24%)
Pigmentation, NOS
1 (2%) 2 (4%) 2 (4%)
Hyperplasia, C-cell
28 (56%) 38 (76%) 34 (68%)
Hyperplasia, follicular cell
1 (2%)
#Thyroid follicle
(50) (50) (50)
Atrophy, NOS
1 (2%)
#Thyroid colloid
(50) (50)
Mineralization
1 (2%)
#Pancreatic islets
(50)
(49)
Hyperplasia, NOS
3 (6%)
1 (2%)
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM
*Mammary gland
(60)
(50) (50)
Cyst, NOS
3 (6%)
Multiple cysts
14 (28%) 11 (22%) 6 (12%)
Hyperplasia, cystic
2 (4%) 1 (2%)
*Preputial gland (50) 150) (50)
Cystic ducts 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration 1 (2%)
Inflammation, suppurative 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
1 (2%)
Abscess, NOS 1 (2%)
*Scrotum
(50) (50)
Steatitis
4 (8%) 2 (4%)
NERVOUS SYSTEM
#Brain
(50) (50) (50)
Compression, NOS
1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Hemorrhage
1 (2%)
Malacia
1 (2%)
MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM
None
BODY CAVITIES
*Epicardium (50) (50) (50)
Inflammation, active chronic 1 (2%)
*Mesentery
(50) (50) (50)
Ulcer, NOS
1 (2%)
Steatitis
1 (2%)
* Number of animals receiving complete necropsy examinations; all gross lesions including masses examined microscopically.
# Number of animals examined microscopically a t this site
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 88
APPENDIX B
2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
PAGE
TABLE B1 SUMMARY OF THE INCIDENCE OF NEOPLASMS IN FEMALE RATS IN THE
TWO-YEAR GAVAGE STUDY O F 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE 91
TABLE B2 INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL TUMOR PATHOLOGY OF FEMALE RATS IN THE TWO-YEAR
GAVAGE STUDY OF' 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE 94
TABLE B4b HISTORICAL INCIDENCE OF PITUITARY GLAND TUMORS IN FEMALE F344/N RATS
ADMINISTERED CORN OIL BY GAVAGE 104
TABLE B4c HISTORICAL INCIDENCE O F ADRENAL GLAND TUMORS IN FEMALE F344/N RATS
ADMINISTERED CORN OIL BY GAVAGE 104
89 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole, NTP TR 332 90
TABLE B1. SUMMARY OF T H E INCIDENCE OF NEOPLASMS I N FEMALE RATS I N T H E TWO-YEAR
GAVAGE STUDY OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
INTEGUMENTARY SYSTEM
*Skin (50) (50) (50)
Squamous cell carcinoma 1 (2%)
Basal cell tumor 1 (2%)
Keratoacanthoma 1 (2%)
"Subcutaneous tissue (50) (50) (50)
Sarcoma, NOS 1 (2%)
Fibroma 2 (4%) 3 (6%) 1 (2%)
Fibrosarcoma 1 (2%)
Fibrous histiocytoma, malignant 1 (2%)
Fibrous histiocytoma, metastatic 1 (2%)
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
#Lung (50) (50) (50)
Alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma 2 (4%)
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma 1 (2%)
Fibrous histiocytoma, metastatic 1 (2%)
HEMATOPOIETIC SYSTEM
*Multiple organs (50) (50) (50)
Leukemia, mononuclear cell 6 (12%) 13 (26%) 9 (18%)
#Spleen (50) (50) (50)
Leukemia, mononuclear cell 1 (2%)
CIRCULATORY SYSTEM
None
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
'Oral cavity
Squamous cell papilloma
*Tongue
Squamous cell papilloma
#Salivary gland
Fibrous histiocytoma, metastatic
#Liver
Neoplastic nodule
Fibrous histiocytoma, metastatic
#Esophagus
Fibrous histiocytoma, metastatic
URINARY SYSTEM
None
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
#Pituitary intermedia (49) (50) (50)
Adenoma, NOS 1 (2%)
#Anterior pituitary (49) (50) (50)
Adenoma, NOS 15 (31%) 24 (48%) 25 (50%)
Adenocarcinoma, NOS 1 (2%)
#Adrenal (50) (50) (50)
Cortical adenoma 2 (4%) 2 (4%)
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM
*Mammary gland (50) (50) (50)
Adenoma, NOS 1 (2%)
Adenocarcinoma, NOS 1 (2%)
Fibroadenoma 12 (24%) 17 (34%) 17 (34%)
*Clitoral gland (50) (50) (50)
Carcinoma, NOS 4 (8%) 8 (16%) 1 (2%)
Adenoma, NOS 5 (10%) 2 (4%) 3 (6%)
#Uterus (50) (50) (50)
Leiomyosarcoma 1 (2%)
Endometrial stromal polyp 13 (26%) 14 (28%) 8 (16%)
Endometrial stromal sarcoma 2 (4%) 2 (4%)
#Ovary (50) (50) (50)
Fibrous histiocytoma, metastetic 1 (2%)
NERVOUS SYSTEM
None
MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM
None
BODY CAVITIES
None
TUMOR SUMMARY
Total animals with primary tumors++ 37 46 40
Total primary tumors 73 104 79
Total animals with benign tumors 31 41 36
Total benign tumors 55 78 64
Total animals with malignant tumors 14 21 13
Total malignant tumors 17 26 15
Total animals with secondary tumors## 1
Total secondary tumors 6
Total animals with tumors uncertain--
benign or malignant 1
Total uncertain tumors 1
Number of animals receiving complete necropsy examinations; all gross lesions including masses examined microscopically.
+*Primary tumors: all tumors except secondary tumors
# Number of animals examined microscopically a t thissite
# # Secondary tumors: metastatic tumors or tumors invasive into an adjacent organ
I I
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l l l l l l l l l l l l l
NUMBER 4 0 2 2 3 1 1 2 0 3 2 3 2 3 1 1 2 4 1 3 1 0 0 0
8 4 1 7 9 5 5 1 8 8 4 4 3 6 0 1 9 7 2 3 5
WEEKS ON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 l 1 1
STUDY 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 8 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 1 3 8 3 2 7 0 1 3 8 9 0 0 8 2 3 4 4 4
M
Subcutaneous tissue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sarcoma, NOS X
Fibroma
M
Lungs and bronchi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bone marrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Spleen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L mphnodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tiymus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Heart + + t + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + +
M
Salivary land + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + t t
Fibrous$istiocytoma, metastatic X
Livar + + + t + + + + t + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + +
Neoplastic nodule X
Fibrous histiocytoma, metastatic X
Bile duct + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + e + + + + + + + +
Pancreas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Em hagus + e + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Fi!rous histiocytoma, metastatic X
Stomach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Small intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Large intestine + + t + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Kidney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unnary bladder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pituitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adenoma NOS X x x x x x
Adenocarhnoma, NOS X
Adrenal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cortical adenoma
Pheochromocytoma X
Th mid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
&cell adenoma X
Parathyroid + - + - + + - + + + - - - + - - + + + - + + + + +
M
M a m m a y gland + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + N + + + + + + +
Adenocarcinoma, NOS X
Fibroadenoma X x x X
Preputial/chtoral gland N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Carcinoma. NOS X X
Adanoma, NOS X X X
UhNS + + + + + + + + + + + + Y + + + + + + + t + + + +
Endometnal stromal polyp x x x X x x
Endometnal stromal sarcoma X X
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + e + + + + + + + + + +
%L%umua histiocytoma. rnataatatic X
Brain + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + t + t t + + + + + +
ANS
Zymbal gland
Carcinoma, NOS I N N N
~~
N N N
~
N N N N N N N N N Xt N N N N N N N N N I
URINARY SYSTEM
Kidney 50
Urinary bladder 50
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
Pituitary 49
Adenoma, NOS X X X X X X X X X 15
Adenocarcinoma, NOS 1
Adrenal 50
Cortical adenoma X X 2
Pheochromocytoma 1
Thyroid 50
C cell adenoma X X X X 5
Parathyroid + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + - + + + + - + + + + 38
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM
Mammary gland + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .(- + + + + + *50
Adenocarcinoma, NOS 1
Fibroadenoma X X X X X X X X 12
Preputial/chtoral gland N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N *50
Carcinoma, NOS X X 4
Adenoma, NOS X X 5
Uterus 50
Endometnal stromal polyp X X X X X X X 13
Endometnal stromal sarcoma 2
Ovary + + -t-4- + + + -t- + -t- + + + + + + + -l- + + + -t- + + + 50
Fibrous histiocytoma, metastatic 1
NERVOUS SYSTEM
Brain 50
* Animals necropsied
ANIMAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NUMBER 2 0 4 4 0 2 0 1 4 3 3 3 0 2 5 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 1
8 8 4 1 5 8 6 6 8 6 5 7 9 0 0 ' 2 6 1 3 3 4 7 0 1 2
b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 ~
1 3 5 6 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 0 7 7 5 6 9 1 1 2 6 9 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4
Skin + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + N + + + +
Keratoacanthoma
Subcutaneous tissue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fibroma X
Fibrosarcoma X
~~ ~~~~~~
Bone marrow + + + + t + + t + t + + + + + t + + t + + + + + +
Spleen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L mphncdes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tgymus + + t + t + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
M
Heart + + + + t t + + + + + + + + + t + + t + + + + + +
Oral cavity N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Salivary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bile duct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pancreas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
&%R""
Small intestine
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
L a r p intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kidney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unnary bladder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ENDOCRINESYSTEM
Pituitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adenoma, NOS X X x x x x x x x X
Adrenal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cortical adenoma X
Pheochmmocytoma X X X
Ganglioneuroma
Thyroid + + + + t + + + + + + t + + + + + + t + + + + + +
C d l adenoma X
C d l carcinoma X
Parathy mid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mammary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fibroadenoma X X x x x x x x X
PmputiaUclitoral gland N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Carcinoma, NOS X X X
Adenoma, NOS Y
UteNS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ovary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brain + + t + t t + + + + + t + t + + + t + + + + + + +
~
ANS
Zymbal gland N N N N N t N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Carcinoma, NOS X
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332 96
TABLE B2. INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL TUMOR PATHOLOGY OF FEMALE RATS: LOW DOSE
(Continued)
ANIMAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NUMBER 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
3 4 5 7 8 9 1 2 9 4 5 7 9 0 1 2 3 4 8 9 0 2 5 7 9
POTAL
WEEKS ON 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'ISSUES
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'UMORS
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Skin + t t + + t + t + + t t t + + t + t + t + + + t t '50
Basal call tumor 1
Keratoacanthoma X 1
Fibroma X X 3
Fibrosarcoma 1
Alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma X X 2
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma X 1
Trachea t t + + + t + + t + + + + t t t + + + + + t + + + 50
Bone marrow
t + t t + t + t t + + + t + t + t + t + + t t t t 50
S leen + + + t t + + t + + + + t t t + + + + + + + + t t 50
L mphnodes + + t t t + + t + t + t t + + t t + t t t + + t t 50
T{ymus + + + + t + + t t t t t + + + t t + t + t + + t t 50
-
Heart t t t t + t t + + t + t t + + + t + t + t + + + + 50
Salivary gland + + t + t + + t + t + + + + + t + t + t + + + + + 50
Liver t + + t t t t + + + + + t + + t t t + t + + t + t 50
Bile duct + t + + + t t t + + + + + t + + + + + t t + + + + 50
Pancreas + + + t + t + + t t t + + t t t + t t + + + + + + 50
t t + + + + t + t + t + t + t t + + t + t + + + + 50
:Small
s%Yintestine +
t
+
t
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
t
+
+
+ + t t t +
+ + + t t +
+
t
t
t
+
t
t
t
+
+
+
t
+
+
+
t
t
t
+
t
t
+
50
50
Large intestine t + t t t + + + + t t t t t + + + + t + t + t t + 50
Kidney t + + t + t + + + + t t t t t t t + + + t t + + + 50
Unnary bladder t t t + t t + + + + t + t + + + t t t t + + t + + 50
Pituitary t + + t t + t t + t + + + t + + t + t + + + + t + 50
Adenoma, NOS x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 25
Adrenal + t + + + + t + + + + t t t + t + t t t + + t + t 50
Cortical adenoma X 2
Pheochromocytoma x x 5
Ganglioneuroma X 1
Thyroid t t + + t + + + t + + + + + + t t + + + t t + t t 50
C.cell adenoma X 2
C-cell carcinoma 1
Parathyroid t + - + + + + + + + + + + - t - + + + + + + t + + 43
+ + + + + + t + + + t t + + + t t + + + + t + t + '50
x x x X X X x x 17
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N '50
X x x x X 8
1 2
Uterus t + t t + t + t + + t + + t + + + t + + + + + + t SO
Ovary + + + + + + + + + + + t t + + + t + t t + + + + + 50
Brain + + + + + + t + t + + + + + + t + t + + + t t + + 50
ANS
Carcinoma, NOS 1
* Animals necropsied
97 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole,NTP TR 332
TABLE 82. INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL TUMOR PATHOLOGY OF FEMALE RATS IN THE TWO-YEAR
GAVAGE STUDY OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE:HIGH DOSE
ANIMAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NUMBER 8 5 5 9 7 5 6 8 6 8 5 1 6 0 6 9 6 7 8 9 1 5 1 1 5
0 1 2 1 2 9 0 5 9 8 8 1 5 0 6 3 1 4 7 6 3 1 6 0 3
WEEKSON 3-0 o o 0 0 0 o o o o D o 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r
STUDY 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0
2 5 5 5 1 9 4 2 4 9 2 2 3 6 0 0 2 2 2 2 4 5 6 1 1
Skin t t t t + t t t t t t t t t + t t t t t t t t t t
Squamous call carcinoma X
Subcutaneous tiisur t t t t t t t t t t + + t t + t + + t t t t t t t
Fibroma
M
t u n s a n d bronchi t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + + + + t t t t t t t
Tracaea t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + + t t t t t t t t
M
Bone marrow t t t t t t t t t t t + t + t t t t + t t t t t +
Spleen + t + t t t t t t t + + t t t + t t t t t t t t t
L mphnodes t t t + t t t + t t t t t t t t t + + t t t t t t
Jymus t t t t t t t t t + t + + + t + t + t t t t t t t
Heart t + t t t t t t t + t t t t t t t t + t t t t t t
Salivary gland t t t t t t t t + t t + + t + t t t t t + t t t t
Liver + + t t + t t t t t t t t t + t t t t t t t t t t
Bile duct t t t t t t t + t + + t + + t + t t + t + t t t t
Pancreas t t t t + t + + + t + + t + + + t t t + t t t t t
t t t t t + t t t t t + t t t t + + + t t + + t t
:Small
tsoo% Y
intestine
t
t
t t
t t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t t t t t t t t
+ + + t + t t t
t
t
t t t t
t t t +
t t + +
+ t t t t
t
t
t
Large intestine t + + t t t + t t + + t + t t + + t + + t t t t +
Kidney t + t + t t + + t t t t + + + t + + t + t t t + +
Unnary bladder t t t t + t t + t + t t t t t t - t t t t + + t t
P
Pituitary t t t t t t t t t + t t t + t t + t t t + t t t t
Adenoma, NOS X X X x x x x x x
Adrenal t t t t t t t t t t + t t + t + + t t t t + + t t
Pheochromocytoma X
Thyroid t t t t t t + t + + t t t t t + t t t t t t t t t
C cell adenoma X
C cell carcinuma
Parathyroid - - - t - - - t t t t t - t t t - t t t t - - t t
Mammary gland + t t + t t t t + t t t + + t t t t + t t t + t t
Adenoma, NOS
Fibroadenoma X x x x x x x x
Preputial/clitoral land N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Carcinoma NO$
Adenoma, kOS X
Uterus t t t t t t t t t t t t + + + + t t t t t t t + t
Leiomyosarcoma X
Endometnal stromal polyp X X X
Endometnal stromal sarcoma X
Ovary t + t t t t t t t t t t t t t + + t t t t t t t t
Brain + t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t
ALL -EMS
Multi leorgans NOS N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
NUMBER 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 6 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
4 5 6 2 3 4 7 8 5 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 8 9 0 2 4 5 7 8 9
fOTAL:
WEEKS ON 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ISSUES
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'UMORS
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Skin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '50
Subcutaneous tissue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * 60
Fibroma X 1
EM
Lun and bronchi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Tracyea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Bone marrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Spleen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
L mphnodea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
dymus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Heart + + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + + + t 50
Salivary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Liver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Bile duct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Pancreas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
2:kr
Small intestine
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
50
50
50
Large intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Kidney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Unnary bladder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Pituitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Adenoma. NOS x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X 25
Adrenal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Pheochromocytoma X X X x x 6
Thyroid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
C.cell adenoma X X 3
C.cell carcinoma X - 1
Parathyroid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Adenoma, NOS X 1
Fibroadenoma x x x x x x X X X 17
Carcinoma NOS X 1
Adsnoma. NOS X X 3
Uterus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Leiomyosarcoma 1
Ovary
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Brain + + t + + + + + t + + + + + t + + + + + + + + t + 50
~euRRmia,mohonuclear cell X X 9
*Animals necropsied
TABLE B3. ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY TUMORS IN FEMALE RATS IN THE TWO-YEAR GAVAGE STUDY
OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
Overall Historical Incidence
TOTAL 27 111,450 ( 18.7%)
SD (b) 8.52%
Range (c)
High 21/50
LOW 2150
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
Overall Historical Incidence
TOTAL (b) 52011,407 (37.0%) (c)4311,407 (3.1%) (b,c)56111,407 (39.9%)
Ran e ( e )
Ifigh 27/49 5/47 30149
LAW 9150 0150 11/50
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
Overall Historical Incidence
TOTAL 8211,443 (5.7%) 511,443 (0.3%) 8611,443 (6.0%)
Ran e(c)
I-figh 7150 1/50 8/50
INTEGUMENTARY SYSTEM
*Subcutaneous tissue (50) (50) (50)
Cyst, NOS 1 (2%)
Steatitis 1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
*Nasal cavity (50) (50) (50)
Hemorrhage 2 (4%) 4 (8%)
Inflammation, acute 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
Inflammation, chronic 4 (8%) 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
Foreign material, NOS 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
*Nasal turbinate (50) (50) (50)
Inflammation, active chronic 2 (4%)
Inflammation, chronic 2 (4%) 3 (6%)
#Lung/bronchiole (50) (50) (50)
Inflammation, acute 1 (2%)
#Lung (50) (50) (50)
Mineralization 1 (2%)
Congestion, NOS 3 (6%) 16 (32%) 7 (14%)
Edema, NOS 2 14%) 3 (6%)
Hemorrhage 10 (20%) 10 (20%) 9 (18%)
Pneumonia, interstitial chronic 3 (6%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Bronchopneumonia, chronic 2 (4%)
Granuloma, pyogenic 1 (2%)
Foreign material, NOS 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, alveolar epithelium 1 (2%)
Histiocytosis 2 (4%) 5 (10%) 3 (6%)
HEMATOPOIETIC SYSTEM
#Spleen (50) (50)
Hematoma, NOS
Pigmentation, NOS 50 1100%) 49 (98%)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Hematopoiesis . 38 (76%) 38 (76%) 41 (82%)
#Splenic capsule (50) (50) (50) ,
Fibrosis 1 (2%)
#Mandibular lymph node (50) (50) (50)
Congestion, NOS 1 (2%)
Plasmacytosis 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid 4 (8%) 4 (8%) 2 (4%)
#Mesenteric lymph node (50) (50) 150)
Congestion, NOS 1 (2%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid 2 (4%)
#Liver (50) (50) (50)
Hematopoiesis 3 (6%) 1 (2%)
#Thymus (50) (50) (50)
Embryonal duct cyst 1 (2%)
Multiple cysts 1 (2%)
Congestion, NOS 3 (6%) 1 (2%)
Hemorrhage 1 (2%)
CIRCULATORY SYSTEM
#Heart (50) (50) (50)
Inflammation, chronic 46 (92%) 47 (94%) 47 (94%)
*Aorta (50) (50) (50)
Periarteritis 1 (2%)
*Pulmonary artery (50)
(50) (50)
Mineralization 4 (8%)
2 (4%) 7 (14%)
*Pulmonary vein (50)
(50) (50)
Mineralization 2 (4%)
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
*Intestinal tract (50) (50) (50)
Bezoar 1 (2%)
*Tongue (50)
(50) (50)
Hyperplasia, epithelial 1 (2%)
#Salivary gland
(50) (50) (50)
Inflammation, chronic
1 (2%)
Atrophy, NOS
5 (10%) 2 (4%) 5 (10%)
#Liver
(50) (50) (50)
Accessory structure
6 (12%) 8 (16%) 1 (2%)
Bile stasis
1 (2%)
Hemorrhage
1 (2%)
Inflammation, acute
1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic
1 (2%)
Granuloma, NOS
5 (10%) 12 (24%) 2 (4%)
Necrosis, NOS
1 (2%) 1 (2%) 3 (6%)
Pigmentation, NOS
1 (2%)
Cytoplasmic vacuolization
5 (10%) 4 (8%)
4 (8%)
Focal cellular change
43 (86%) 42 (84%)
39 (78%)
Hepatocytomegaly
1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, NOS
3 (6%)
Angiectasis
1 (2%) 2 (4%)
2 (4%)
#Liver/periportal
(50) (50) (50)
Inflammation, chronic
42 (84%) 45 (90%) 45 (90%)
#Bile duct
(50) (50) (50)
Hyperplasia, NOS
34 (68%) 42 (84%) 45 (90%)
#Pancreas (50)
(50) (50)
Cystic ducts 1 (2%)
URINARY SYSTEM
#Kidney (50)
(50)
(50)
Nephropathy 38 (76%) 42 (84%) 41 (82%)
# Kidneyltubule (50)
(50) (50)
Mineralization 46 (92%) 44 (88%) 46 (92%)
Pigmentation, NOS 46 (92%) 48 (96%) 46 (92%)
Hyperplasia, focal 1 (2%)
# Kidneylpelvis (50)
(50)
(50)
Calculus, microscopic examination 1 (2%)
Mineralization 1 (2%)
Hemorrhage 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, epithelial 1 (2%)
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
#Pituitary (49) (50)
(50)
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM
*Mammary gland
(50) (50) (50)
Multiple cysts
26 (52%) 40 (80%) 33 (66%)
Hyperplasia, NOS
1 (2%)
*Preputial gland
(50) (50) (50)
Inflammation, chronic
1 (2%)
*Clitoral gland (50) (50 1 (50)
Cystic ducts 1 (2%)
Inflammation, suppurative 3 (6%) 1 (2%)
#Uterus
(50)
(50) (50)
Dilatation, NOS
2 (4%)
3 (6%)
Hydrometra
1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Hematoma, NOS
1 (2%)
Hematoma, organized
1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic
1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, epithelial
1 (2%)
#Cervix uteri
(50) (50) (50)
Polyp, NOS
1 (2%)
#Uterus/endometrium
(50) (50) (50)
Inflammation, chronic
1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, cystic
9 (18%) 14 (28%) 6 (12%)
#Ovary
(50)
(50) (50)
Parovarian cyst
2 (4%)
5 (10%) 2 (4%)
Inflammation, chronic
1 (2%)
#Mesovarium
(50) (50) (50)
Steatitis
1 (2%)
NERVOUS SYSTEM
#Brain
(50)
(50) (50)
Compression, NOS
6 (12%)
2 (4%) 5 (10%)
Mineralization
1 (2%)
Malacia
1 (2%)
MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM
None
BODY CAVITIES
*Mesentery (50) (50) (50)
Steatitis 6 (12%) 7 (14%) 7 (14%)
ALLOTHERSYSTEMS
*Multiple organs (50) (50) (50)
Inflammation, chronic 1 (2%)
Adipose tissue
Steatitis 1
* Number of animals receiving complete necropsy examinations; all gross lesions including masses examined microscopically.
# Number of animals examined microscopically a t thissite
2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
PAGE
INTEGUMENTARY SYSTEM
*Skin (49) (50) (50)
Keratoacanthoma 1 (2%)
*Subcutaneous tissue
(49) (50) (50)
Sarcoma, NOS
1 (2%) 2 (4%)
Fibroma
1 (2%) 3 (6%) 1 (2%)
Fibrosarcoma
2 (4%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
*Nasal cavity (49) (50) (50)
Fibroma 1 (2%)
#Lung (49) (50) (50)
Adenocarcinoma, NOS, metastatic 1 (2%)
Hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic 1 (2%)
Alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma 3 (6%) 4 (8%) 4 (8%)
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma 5 (10%) 5 (10%) 1 (2%)
Sarcoma, NOS, metastatic 1 (2%)
Neurilemoma, metastatic 1 (2%)
HEMATOPOIETIC SYSTEM
*Multiple organs (49) (50) (50 )
Malignant lymphoma, lymphocytic type 1 (2%)
Malignant lymphoma, histiocytic type 3 (6%) 1 (2%)
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type 2 (4%) 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
#Mesenteric lymph node (49) (50) (48)
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type 1 (2%)
#Liver (49) (50) (50)
Malignant lymphoma, NOS 1 (2%)
XPeyer’s patch (49) (50) (50)
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type 1 (2%)
CIRCULATORY SYSTEM
#Spleen (49)
Hemangiosarcoma
#Liver
(49)
Hemangioma
Hemangiosarcoma
#Testis
Hemangioma
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
#Salivary gland (49) (50) (50)
Adenocarcinoma, NOS, metastatic 1 (2%)
#Liver
(49) (50) (50)
Hepatocellular adenoma
11 (22%) 14 (28%) 9 (18%)
Hepatocellular carcinoma
5 (10%) 9 (18%) 6 (12%)
Sarcoma, NOS
2 (4%)
URINARY SYSTEM
#Kidney (49) (50) (50)
Tubular cell adenoma 1 (2%)
#Kidney/cortex (49) (50) (50)
Adenocarcinoma, NOS, metastatic 1 (2%)
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
#Anterior pituitary (49) (48)
Adenoma, NOS 1 (2%)
#Adrenal (49) (50)
Cortical adenoma 1 (2%)
#Adrenal medulla (49) (50)
Pheochromocytoma 3 (6%)
#Thyroid (49) (50)
Follicular cell adenoma 2 (4%)
#Pancreatic islets (49) (50)
Islet cell adenoma
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM
*Mammary gland (49) (50) (50)
Adenocarcinoma, NOS 1 (2%)
#Testis (49) (50) (50)
Interstitial cell tumor 1 (2%)
NERVOUS SYSTEM
None
MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM
None
BODY CAVITIES
*Mediastinum (49) (50 ) (50)
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma, invasive 1 (2%)
Neurilemoma, metastatic 1 (2%)
*Pleura (49) (50) (50)
Natural death
4 6
12
Moribund sacrifice
7 11
2
Terminal sacrifice
38
33
30
Animal missing
1
TUMOR SUMMARY
* Number of animals receiving complete necropsy examinations; all gross lesions including masses examined microscopically.
** Primary tumors: all tumors except secondary tumors
# Number of animals examined microscopically at this site
# # Secondary tumors: metastatic tumors or tumors invasive into a n adjacent organ
TABLE C2. INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL TUMOR PATHOLOGY OF MALE MICE IN THE TWO-YEAR
GAVAGE STUDY OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE : VEHICLE CONTROL
ANIMAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NUMBER 2 0 0 0 2 1 1 4 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
0 1 9 8 7 7 8 5 1 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 3 4 5 6 9 2
WEEKS ON
STUDY
Skm
+ + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Keratoacanthoma
Subcutaneous tissue
+ + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Sarcoma. NOS
X
F~hroma
F~brosarcoma
X X
Alveolarhronchiolar adenoma
X
Alveolarhronch~olarcarcinoma
X
Trachea + + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Bone marrow
+ + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Spleen
+ + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + , + c
L mph nodes
+ + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
TKY~US + + + + + + + + + + - M - + + + + + + - + + + - +
Heart + + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Salivary gland
+ t t + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Hepatocellular adenoma
X X
X X X
Hepatocellular carcinoma
X X X X X
Blle duct
+ + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Pancreas
+ + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
:22r
Small intestlne
+ + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Large Intestme
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
K~dney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unnary bladder + + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Pituitary + + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Adrenal + t + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Thyroid + + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Mammary gland N N N N N N N N + N N M N N N N N N N N + N N N +
Adenocarcmoma, NOS X
Testis + + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Bram + + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Harderian gland N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Adenoma. NOS X
NUMBER
2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5
3 4 5 6 8 9 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 0
WEEKS ON Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l l l l
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Skin t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + t t t + t t + *49
Keratoacanthoma X 1
Sarcoma, NOS 1
Fibroma X 1
Fibrosarcoma 2
Alveolarlbmnchlblar ahenoma x x 3
Alveolarlbmnchiolar carcinoma x x X X 5
Sarcoma, NOS,metastatic 1
Trachea t t t t t + t t t + t + t t t + + + t t + + + + + 49
Bone marrow + t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + t + t + + t + + 49
Spleen t t t t t t + t t t + t t t t t + t t + t + t + + 49
L mphncdes + t t t t t t t t + + t t + t + t + + t + + + + + 49
Tiymus t t t t t t t t + t t + t t + t + t + t + + t + t 45
Heart t t t + t t t t t t t + t t + t t + t + t + t + t 49
Salivary gland t t t + t + + t t t t + t t + t + t t + + + + + + 49
Adenocarcinoma, NOS,metastatic 1
Liver t + t t t t t t t + t t t + t + t t + t + + t t + 49
Hepatocellular adenoma x x x x x X 11
Hepatocellular carcinoma 5
Bile duct t t t t t t + t t + t + t + t t t t + t + + t + + 49
Pancreas t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + + + t t + + t + 49
+ t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + t t + + t + t 49
%kY
Small intestine
t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + + + t + + + + + 49
t t t t t t t t t t t t t + t + + t t + + + t + + 49
Large intestine t t t t t + t t t t t t t t + t + t t t t + + t + 49
Kidney t t t t t t t t t t t + + t t t + t t t + + t t + 49
Adenocarcinoma, NOS,metestatic 1
Unnary bladder t t t t + t t t t t t + + t t t + t t + t + + t + 49
Pituitary t t t t t t t t + t t + t t + t t t + t + + t + + 49
Adrenal t t t + t t t t t t t t t t t + t t + + + + t + + 49
Thyroid t t t t t t t t t + t t + + t t t + t t + + t + t 49
Parathy
Parathymid
mid - t t - t t t - - t - + - - + t t t - + - - t + - 29
Adenocarcinoma, NOS 1
Testis t t t t + t t t + t + t + t + + + + + t + + t + t 49
Prostate t t t t t t t t t t t t t + t t t t t t + t + + + 49
Brain + t + + + + + t + + t t t t + t + t t t + + + + + 49
ANS
Adenoma, NOS x x 3
~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~
Animals necropsied
TABLE C2. INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL TUMOR PATHOLOGY OF MALE MICE IN THE TWO-YEAR
GAVAGE STUDY OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE: LOW DOSE
ANIMAL
NUMBER
WEEKS ON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
STUDY 0 8 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 8 9 6 6 7 0 3 6 7 9 9 2 8 8 0 1 3 3 3 3 3 5 9 3
Subcutaneous tissue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sarcoma, NOS X X
Fibroma
Fibrosarcoma X X
M
Lungs and bmnchi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Alveolarlbmnchiolar adenoma x x
Alveolarlbmnchiolar carcinoma X X " X
Neurilemoma, metastatic n
Trachea + + + + + + + t + + + + t + + + + + t + + + t + +
Nasal cavity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fibroma X
Bone marmw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Spleen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hemangiosarcoma
L mphncdes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tgymus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~~
Heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Salivary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hepatocellular adenoma x x x x x x x
Heoatocellular carcinoma x x x x x x
Hemanpoma
Malignant lymphoma, NOS X
Bile duct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gallbladder & common bile duct N + + + + t + + + + + + t t + + + N N + + + + + +
Pancreas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
:t%kY
Small intsstine
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Large intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kidney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tubular cell adenoma
Unnary bladder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pituitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adenoma. NOS
Adrenal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cortical adenoma
Pheochromocytoma X X
Thyroid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Parathyroid + + + + - - - - - - - + - + + + + - - - - + + + -
M
Mammary gland N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Testis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hemangioma
Prostate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
mCIAL ORGANS
Hardenan gland Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Adenoma, NOS X X
Pleura Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma, invasive X
Mediastinum Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma, invasive
Neunlemoma, metastatic X
~~
S
Multiple organs NOS Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Malignant lydphoma, lymphocytlc type X
Mali nant lymphoma, mixed type
Orbitay repon
Neunlemoma. malignant X
NUMBER 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5
2 3 4 6 0 1 3 4 5 6 7 9 0 2 3 4 6 1 8 9 4 5 6 7 0
TOTAL:
WEEKSON 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1PISSUES
l ~
~ ~
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0I'UMORE
3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
-
Subcutaneous tissue t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + + + + + t t '50
Sarcoma, NOS 2
Fibroma x x X 3
Fibrosarcoma 2
Alveolarfbronchiolar adenoma X X 4
Alveolarfbronchiolar carcinoma X X 5
Neunlemoma, metastatic 1
Trachea + t t t t t t t t t + t + t t t + t t + + + + t t 50
Bone marrow + t t t t t t t t t t t t + t t t + t t t + + t + 48
Spleen t t t t + t t t t t t t t t t t + t t + t t + t + 50
Hemanposarcoma X 1
L mphnodea + t t t t t + t t + t t t t t + + t t t t t t t + 50
Tgymus t t + t t - + t t t t t - + + t t t + t - + t t t 44
Heart t t t t t t t t t t t t + t t t t + + t + + + t + 50
Salivary gland t t t t t + t t t t t t + t + + + t t + + + t t t 50
Liver + + t t t t t t + t t t + t t t + t + t + t t t t 50
Hepatocellular adenoma X X x x x x X 14
Hepatocellular carcinoma X X X 9
HemanPoma X 1
Bile duct t t t t + t t t t t t t + t + t t t t t t + t t t 50
Pancreas t t t t t t t t t t t + t t t t t t + t t + + t + 50
t t t t t t t t + t t + + t t + t t t + t t + t t 50
t t t t t t t t t t t t + + t t + + + t t t t t t SO
t t t t t t t t t t + + + t t t t + + t t t + t t 50
+ t t t t t t t + t t t + t t t t t t + + + + t t 50
Kidney + t + t t t t t t t t t t + t t + + t + + + + t t 50
Urinary bladder t t t t t t + + t t t + t t + t + + + + + + + + + 50
-
Pituitary + t t t t t t + + t t t t + + + t + + - + + + + + 48
Adenoma, NOS X 1
Adrenal t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t + + t + + t t t + t 50
Cortical adenoma X 1
Pheochromocytoma X 3
Thyroid + t t t t t t t + t t t t t t t + t t t + + t t t 50
Parathyroid t t t + - - t + t t t t t t - t t - + + - t + t - 31
Hemannoma X 1
Prostate t t t t + + + t t t t t t t + + + t + t + + + t + 50
-
Brain t t t t t t + t t + + t + t + t + + + + + + + + + 50
~~ ~ -
ANS
Hardanan gland V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N '50
Adenoma, NOS 2
-
Pleura i N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N $50
Mediastinum P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N *50
Neunlemoma, metastatic 1
-
S
Multiple organs NOS i N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N *50
Malig lym h o k a lymphocytic type 1
Orbitay m o o n
Neunlemoma, malignant 1
* Animals necropsied
TABLE C2. INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL TUMOR PATHOLOGY OF MALE MICE IN THE TWO-YEAR
GAVAGE STUDY OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE: HIGH DOSE
ANIMAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NUMBER 5 8 5 5 6 6 8 8 9 9 9 7 9 8 8 9 8 9 5 8 5 5 5 5 5
5 3 4 8 2 5 8 9 7 9 8 6 0 6 7 3 2 1 3 4 1 2 6 7 9
WEEKS ON ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1
STUDY 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 6 7 8 8 0 0 0 0 0
7 7 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 6 7 6 7 7 7 1 1 9 9 3 3 3 3 3
Subcutaneous tissue
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fibroma
Fibrosarcoma
Bone marrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Soleen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L*m hnodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~~
Heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Salivary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liver .........................
Hepatocellular adenoma A
Hepatocellular carcinoma x x x
Sarcoma, NOS
HemanGosarcoma X
Bile duct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pancreas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Small intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Large intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
EM
Kidney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unnary bladder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pituitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adenoma, NOS X
Adrenal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thyroid - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Follicular cell adenoma
Parathyroid - - _ t + + + + - - - + - - - - + + + + - + + + +
Pancreatic islets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mammary gland N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Testis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prostate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ORGANS
~~ ~
Harderian gland N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Adenoma, NOS
S
* Animals necropsied
Adjusted Rates(b)
47.2% 64.6%
5 1.6%
INTEGUMENTARY SYSTEM
*Skin
(49) (50) (SO)
Mineralization
1 (2%)
Ulcer, NOS
3 (6%) 1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic
3 (6%) 3 (6%)
Exfoliative dermatitis
1 (2%)
Hyperkeratosis
1 (2%)
*Subcutaneous tissue
(49) (50) (50)
Steatitis
1(2%)
Abscess, NOS
1(2%)
Inflammation, chronic
2 (4%)
Granuloma, NOS
1(2%)
Granuloma, foreign body
2 (4%)
Granulation tissue
1 (2%)
RESPIRAT0 RY SYSTEM
*Nasal cavity (49) (50) (50)
Hemorrhage 10 (20%) 7 (14%) 7 (14%)
Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration 2 (4%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Inflammation, acute 3 (6%)
*Nasal turbinate
(49) (50) (50)
Inflammation, chronic
1 (2%)
#Lung (49) (50) (50)
Mineralization 1 (2%) 2 (4%) 3 (6%)
Emphysema, alveolar 1 (2%)
Congestion, NOS 1 (2%) 8 (16%)
Hemorrhage 11 (22%) 7 (14%) 16 (32%)
Bronchopneumonia, NOS 12 (24%) 16 (32%) 16 (32%)
Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 10 (20%)
Pneumonia, interstitial chronic 1 (2%)
Cholesterol deposit 2 (4%) 5 (10%) 8 (16%)
Hemosiderosis 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, alveolar epithelium 12 (24%) 19 (38%) 13 (26%)
Histiocytosis 13 (27%) 20 (40%) 13 (26%)
HEMATOPOIETIC SYSTEM
#Bone marrow
(49) (48) (50)
Hemorrhage
1 (2%)
Fibrosis
2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, granulocytic
40 (82%) 40 683%) 28 (56%)
#Spleen
(49) (50) (50)
Pigmentation, NOS
4 (8%) 5 (10%) 4 (8%)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid
12 (24%) 6 (12%) 10 (20%)
Hematopoiesis
12 (24%) 10 (20%) 4 (8%)
#Lymph node
(49) (50) (48)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid
3 (6%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
#Mandibular lymph node
(49) (50) (48)
Pigmentation, NOS
1 (2%) 2 (4%)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid
3 (6%) 2 (4%) 4 (8%)
#Mesenteric lymph node
(49) (50) (48)
Congestion, NOS
13 (27%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Hemorrhage
1 (2%)
Inflammation, acute
1 (2%)
Inflammation, active chronic
1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid
3 (6%) 7 (14%) 2 (4%)
CIRCULATORY SYSTEM
#Heart (49) (50) (50)
Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration 1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic 4 (8%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
*Artery (49) (50) (50)
Mineralization 1 (2%)
Periarteritis 1 (2%)
*Aorta (49) (50) (50)
Mineralization 1 (2%)
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
*Root oftooth (49) (50) (50)
Inflammation, active chronic 1 (2%)
*Pulp of tooth (49) (50) (50)
Dysplasia, NOS 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
#Salivary gland (49) (50) (50)
Mineralization 1 (2%)
Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
Inflammation, chronic 1 (2%) 5 (10%)
Atrophy, NOS 1 (2%) 3 (6%) 3 (6%)
#Liver (49 ) (50) (50)
Mineralization 1 (2%)
Cyst, NOS 1 (2%)
Congestion, NOS 1 (2%)
Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration 2 (4%)
Inflammation, acute 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Inflammation, active chronic 2 (4%)
Necrosis, coagulative 1 (2%)
Cytoplasmic vacuolization 7 (14%) 7 (14%) 9 (18%)
Focal cellular change 2 (4%) 3 (6%) 2 (4%)
Hepa tocytomegaly 1 (2%) 3 (6%) 1 (2%)
#Liver/centrilobular (49 (50) (50)
Necrosis, coagulative 1 (2%)
#Liver/periportal (49) (50) (50)
Inflammation, chronic 1 (2%)
*Gallbladder (49) (50) (50)
Cyst, NOS 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Inflammation, acute 1 (2%)
#Pancreas (49) (50) (50)
Cyst, NOS 1 (2%)
Necrosis, NOS 1 (2%)
#Pancreatic acinus (49) (50) (50)
Focal cellular change 1 (2%) 3 (6%) 3 (6%)
Atrophy, NOS 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, NOS 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
#Stomach (49) (50) (50)
Inflammation, chronic 1 (2%)
#Gastric fundal gland (49) (50) (50)
Dilatation, NOS 6 (12%) 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
URINARY SYSTEM
#Kidney (49) (50) (50)
Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration 1 (2%) 8 (16%)
Inflammation, chronic 3 (6%) 8 (16%) 3 (6%)
# Kidneykortex
(49) (50)
(50)
Cyst, NOS
4 (8%) 3 (6%)
Multiple cysta
4 (8%)
Metaplasia, osseous
1 (2%) 2 (4%)
# Kidneykubule
(49) (50)
(50)
Mineralization
32 (65%) 29 (58%) 26 (52%)
Dilatation, NOS
5 (10%) 5 (10%) 6 (12%)
Cyst, NOS
1 (2%)
Necrosis, NOS
9 (18%) 6 (12%) 5 (10%)
Cytoplasmic vacuolization
3 (6%)
Regeneration, NOS
39 (80%) 42 (84%) 34 (68%)
#Kidney/pelvis
(49) (50) (50)
Hemorrhage
1 (2%)
#Urinary bladder (49) (50) (48 )
Mineralization 1 (2%)
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
#Pituitary intermedia (49) (48) (50)
#Anterior pituitary
(49) (48) (50)
Cyst, NOS
1 (2%) 3 (6%)
Multiple cysts
1 (2%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, NOS
1 (2%) 3 (6%) 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, focal
1 (2%)
# Adrenakapsule
(49) (50) (48)
Hyperplasia, NOS
48 (98%) 45 (90%) 39 (81%)
#Adrenal cortex
(49) (50) (48)
Accessory structure
1 (2%)
Cyst, NOS
1 (2%)
Focal cellular change
Hypertrophy, focal
1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, NOS 5 (10%) 4 (8%)
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM
*Preputial gland (49) (50) (50)
Cystic ducts 8 (16%) 6 (12%) 4 (8%)
Inflammation, suppurative 1 (2%)
Abscess, NOS 1 (2%)
Inflammation, active chronic
Inflammation, chronic 10 (20%)
#Prostate (49)
Inflammation, chronic 2 (4%)
*Seminal vesicle (49)
Dilatation, NOS 2 (4%)
Cyst, NOS
Inflammation, chronic
#Testis (49)
Atrophy, NOS 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, interstitial cell
#Testidtubule (49) (50)
Mineralization 3 (6%)
*Epididymis (49) (50)
Inflammation, chronic 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Granuloma, spermatic 2 (4%)
*Scrotum (49) (50)
Steatitis 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
NERVOUS SYSTEM
*Choroid plexus (49) (50) (50)
Mineralization 1 (2%)
#Brain (49) (50) (50)
Compression, NOS 1 (2%)
Mineralization 37 (76%) 27 (54%) 22 (44%)
Congestion, NOS 1 (2%)
MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM
*Kneejoint (49) (50) (50)
Osteoarthritis 1 (2%)
*Tarsal joint (49) (50) (50)
Ankylosis 18 (37%) 15 (30%) 12 (24%)
BODY CAVITIES
*Peritoneum (49) (50) (50)
Steatitis 1 (2%)
*Pericardium (49) (50) (50)
Inflammation, chronic 1 (2%)
*Mesentery (49) (50) (50)
Cyst, NOS 1 (2%)
Steatitis 3 (6%) 4 (8%) 3 (6%)
* Number of animals receiving complete necropsy examinations; all gross lesions including masses examined microscopically.
d Number of animals examined microscopically a t this site
2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
PAGE
INTEGUMENTARY SYSTEM
*Subcutaneoustissue
(50) (49) (50)
Fibrosarcoma
t 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
*Nasal cavity
(50) (49) (50)
Carcinoma, NOS, invasive
1 (2%)
#Lung (50) (49) (50)
Carcinoma, NOS, metastatic 1 (2%)
Adenocarcinoma, NOS, metastatic 1 (2%)
Alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma 2 (4%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Endometrial stromal sarcoma, metastatic 1 (2%)
HEMATOPOIETIC SYSTEM
*Multiple organs (50) (49) (50)
Malignant lymphoma, histiocytic type 1 (2%)
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type 17 (34%) 6 (12%) 6 (12%)
#Spleen (50) (49) (50)
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
#Lymph node (50) (47) (48)
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type 1 (2%)
#Liver (50) (49) (50)
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type 1 (2%)
#Jejunum (50) (49) (48)
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type 1 (2%)
CIRCULATORY SYSTEM
#Liver
Hemangiosarcoma
#Uterus
Hemangioma
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
*Tongue (50) (49) (50)
Squamous cell carcinoma 1 (2%)
#Liver (50) (49) (50)
Carcinoma, NOS, metastatic 1 (2%)
Hepatocellular adenoma 3 (6%) 7 (14%) 4 (8%)
Hepatocellular carcinoma 1 (2%) 5 (10%)
Endometrial stromal sarcoma, metastatic 1 (2%)
#Stomach
(50) (48) (50)
Sarcoma, NOS
1 (2%)
#Jejunum
(50) (49) (48)
Carcinoma, NOS
1 (2%)
URINARY SYSTEM
None
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
#Anterior pituitary (49) (49) (49)
Carcinoma, NOS 1 (2%)
Adenoma, NOS 20 (41%) 11 (22%) 3 (6%)
# Adrenallcapsule (50) (47) (50)
Carcinoma, NOS 1 (2%)
Adenoma, NOS 1 (2%)
#Adrenal medulla (50)
Pheochromocytoma 1 (2%)
#Thyroid (50)
Follicular cell adenoma
Follicular cell carcinoma
#Pancreatic islets (50)
Islet cell adenoma 1 (2%)
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM
*Mammary gland (50) (49) (50)
Adenocarcinoma, NOS 2 (4%)
*Vagina (50) (49) (50)
Squamous cell carcinoma 1 (2%)
#Uterus (50) (49) (50)
Endometrial stromal polyp 1 (2%)
Endometrial stromal sarcoma 1 (2%)
#Ovary (50) (48) (46)
Cystadenoma, NOS 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
Granulosa cell tumor 1 (2%)
NERVOUS SYSTEM
#Braidmeninges
Fibrosarcoma, invasive
*Spinal dura mater
Fibrosarcoma, invasive
#Brain
Carcinoma, NOS,invasive
MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM
*Vertebra (50) (49) (50)
Fibrosarcoma, invasive 1 (2%)
BODY CAVITIES
*Mesentery (50) (49) (50)
Sarcoma, NOS, invasive 1 (2%)
TUMOR SUMMARY
Total animals with primary tumors** 38 33 15
Total primary tumors 63 46 22
Total animals with benign tumors 25 21 11
Total benign tumors 32 26 12
Total animals with malignant tumors 27 18 9
Total malignant tumors 31 19 10
Total animals with secondary tumors## 5 2 2
Total secondary tumors 8 2 2
Total animals with tumors uncertain--
benign or malignant 1
Total uncertain tumors 1
* Number of animals receiving complete necropsy examinations; all grsss lesions including massesexarnined microscopically.
t Multiple occurrence of morphology in the same organ; tissue is counted once only.
** Primary tumors: all tumors except secondary tumors
# Number of animals examined microscopically a t this site
# # Secondary tumors: metastatic tumors or tumors invasive into an adjacent organ
WEEKS ON
STUDY
Subcutaneous tissue + + t + t + + + + + + t t + + + + + + + + + + + t
Fibrosarcoma x @X
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lungs and bronchi + + t + + t + + + + + + + + t + + + + t + + + + +
Carcinoma, NOS, metastatic X
Alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma X
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma
Endometrial stromal sarcoma, metastatic
Trachea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nasal cavity N N + + + + t + + + + + t + t + + + + + + + + + +
Carcinoma, NOS,invasive X
Bone marrow + + + + t t + t t t + + t + + + + t + + t t + t t
Spleen + + + t + + + + t t + t t + + + + + t t + t + t +
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type
L mphnodes + + + t t + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
dymus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Heart t + + + + + t + + t + + + + + + t + t t + t + + +
Oral cavity N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Squamous cell carcinoma X
Salivary gland + t + t + + + t t + + + + + + + t + + + t t + + +
Liver t + + + + + + + t + + t + t + + + t + + + t t + t
Hepatocellular adenoma X
He atocellular carcinoma X
Entlometrial stromal sarcoma metastatic
Malignant lymphoma, mixed iype
Bile duct + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + + t
Gallbladder & common bile duct + t + t + + + t + t + + + + + + t + + + + + t + t
Pancreas + + + t + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + +
:;::2Y
Small intestine
+
+
+
+
+
t
+
t
t
+
t
t
t
t
+
+
+
+
+
+
t
+
+
+
t
t
t
t
t
+
+
t
t
+
t
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
t
+
+
t
+
+
+
+
t
+
+
+
+
+
+ + + + + t
+ + + + + t
t t + + + t
Carcinoma, NOS
Large intestine t + + t + t + + + t + + + t + t t t + + t + t t t
M
Kidney + + t t + t + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + t t + +
Urinary bladder t t t t + t + + + + + + t + t + + + + + + + + + t
Pituitary + + + + t t t + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Carcinoma, NOS X
Adenoma, NOS X X x x
Ad re na I + + + + t t + + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + t
Adenoma, NOS
Pheochromocytoma
Thyroid t + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + t
Parathyroid + - + - + - - - - + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + -
Pancreatic islets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Islet-cell adenoma
Mammary gland N N + + + + t + + + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + +
Vamna N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
+ + + + + + t + + t t + + + t + + + + + + + + + +
t + t + + t t + t + + + + + t + + + + + + t + + +
Brain
Carcinoma. NOS, invasive
Spinal cord
Fibrosarcoma, invasive
Hardenan gland N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Carcinoma. NOS X
Adenoma, NOS
- _.
ETAL SYSTEM
Bone N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Fibrosarcoma, invasive X
0
1- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
WEEKS ON 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
STUDY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Subcutaneous tissue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fibrosarcoma
KESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lungs and bronchi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma X 2
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma X 1
Trachea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Bone marmw . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
S lean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
LvmDh nodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Thymus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Salivary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Liver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Hepatocellular adenoma x x 3
He atocellular carcinoma
En2ometnal stromal sarcoma, meta
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type
Bile duct
I
. . .
X
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
. .
1
50
Pancreas + + + + + + + e + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 50+
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2lk:BCfls
Small intestine
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
50
50
50
Carcinoma, NOS X 1
Large intestine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
7
Unnary bladder
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
50
50
Pituitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Carcinoma, NOS 1
Adenoma, NOS x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 20
Adrenal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Adenoma, NOS X 1
Pheochromocytoma X 1
Thyroid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Parathyroid + + - + - + + + + - + + - + + + + + + + + - + + - 36
Pancreatic islets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
EM
Mammary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * 50
Vagma N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N '50
uterus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Hemangioma X 1
Ovary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Brain
M
I+++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I-- 50
I:
Carcinoma, NOS,invasive
Spinal cord N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N *50
Fibrosarcoma, invasive
Carcinoma. NOS 1
Adenoma, NOS X x 2
Bone N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N *50
Fibrosarcoma, invasive 1
Sarcoma, ROS
Fibmsarcoma, metastatic
X 1
1-1
* Animals necropsied
TABLE D2. INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL TUMOR PATHOLOGY OF FEMALE MICE IN THE TWO-YEAR
GAVAGE STUDY OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE: LOW DOSE
ANIMAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NUMBER 2 0 3 4 4 4 3 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 7 5 0 7 3 1 8 2 3 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 0 1 4 5 6 7
WEEKS ON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
STUDY 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 7 7 7 9 7 8 8 9 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Subcutaneous tissue + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Fibrosarcoma X
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lungs and bronchi + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Adenocarcinoma, NOS, metastatic X
Alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma
Trachea + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Bone marrow + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Spleen + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type
Lymph nodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type
Thymus + + + - + + + + + + M + + + + + - + + + + + + + +
Heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
TEM
Salivary gland t + + t + t + + t + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Liver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hepatocellular adenoma X X X
Hepatocellular carcinoma X x x
Hemanaosarcoma X
Bile duct + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + t
:,,,,
Gallbladder & common bile duct
Pancreas
Small intestine
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type
Large intestine
+ + + + + + + + + +
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
- + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + +
M
M
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + +
X
+ + + + +
+
+
+ +
+ +
Kidney + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Unnary bladder + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Pituitary + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Adenoma, NOS X X x x X
Adrenal + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + -
Thyroid + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Follicular cell adenoma X
Parathyroid + + - + - + + - + - M - + + + + + - + - - + + - +
Mammary gland + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Adenocarcinoma. NOS X
Uterus + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Ovary + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Cystadenoma, NOS X
Brain + + + + + + + + + + M + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Fibrosarcoma. invasive X
SPECIAL
Hardenan gland N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Adenoma, NOS X X x x
S
* Animals necropsied
WEEKSON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
STUDY 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 5 5 9 6 7 7 ? 8 9 9
2 2 3 3 3 3 0 8 0 0 8 9 5 8 9 2 8 9 4 3 5 8 1 4 7
Alveolarbronchiolar adenoma X
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma
Trachea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bone marrow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Spleen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L mphncdes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Txymus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Heart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Salivary gland . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liver + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t t t t
Carcinoma, NOS,metastatic
Hepatocellular adenoma
Bile duct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kidney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unnary bladder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pituitary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adenoma, NOS X
Adrenal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Carcinoma, NOS
Thyroid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cystadenoma, NOS
Brain
Hardenan gland N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Adenoma, NOS
Mesentery N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Sarcoma, NOS,invasive X
ALL
Multiple organs, NOS N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type X
I I
NUMBER 9 9 6 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9
0 7 1 1 4 7 9 0 7 8 0 1 2 4 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 5 8 9
TOTAL:
WEEKS ON
0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TISSUES
STUDY 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TUMORS
a 8 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Alveolar/bronchiolar adenoma 1
Alveolar/bronchiolar carcinoma X 1
Trachea t + + t + + + + + + t + + + + + + + t + + + t + + 50
Bone marrow + + + + + + + t t t + t + + + + t + + t + + + + + 50
Spleen + + t + + + t t t t t t + + t t t + t t + + t + t 50
L mphncdes t + + + + + + + + + + t + + + + t + + t + + + + t 48
Txymus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Heart t + + + + + + t + + + + + + t t + t + + t + + + + 50
TEM
Salivary gland + t t t + + t t + + + t + + + + t + t + t + + + + 50
Liver + + t + + + + t + + + + + + t t t t + t t t + + + 50
Carcinoma, NOS,metastatic X 1
Hepatocellular adenoma x x X X 4
Bile duct t + + + t + t + + + + t + + + + + + + + + t t + + 50
Pancreas + t + + + + + + + + t t + + + t t t t + t t t t + 50
:Ekrs
Sarcoma, NOS
t
+
+
t
t
+
t
t
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
t + + t + + t t t + t + t t t t +
+ t + t + t t + t + + + + t t + +
49
50
Small intestine t + + + + + + + t + + t + t t t + + + + + t t + t 48
Large intestine + + + + + + + + + t t + t t + + t t t t t t + + t 48
Kidney + + + + + + + + + + t t t + t + + + + + t + +
50
+ +
Unnary bladder + + + + + t + + + + t + + t t + t + + + + t t t + 49
Pituitary t + + t + + t + t + + t + t + t + t + + + + + + t 49
Adenoma, NOS X X 3
Adrenal + + t + + + + t + t t + + + t + + t + + + + + + + 50
Carcinoma, NOS X 1
Thyroid + t t + t + + + + + t t t + t + + + + t t + + t + 49
Parathyroid t + + t - t + t - + - - t t - t t t t - + - + + + 32
Uterus + + t + t t + + + + + + t t + t t + + t t + t t t 50
Ovary + + t + + t t t t t - + t + t + + + + - + + t + + 46
Cystadenoma, NOS X X 2
-
Brain t + + t t + t + + + + + t t + + + t t t t + t + t 50
ORGANS
Hardenan gland N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N $50
Adenoma, NOS X X 2
M esentery N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Sarcoma, NOS,invasive
ALL O T m
Multiple organs. NOS N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Malignant lymphoma, mixed type X X x x X
I-
* Animals necropsied
TABLE D3. ANALYSIS O F PRIMARY TUMORS IN FEMALE MICE IN T H E TWO-YEAR GAVAGE STUDY
O F 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
Overall Historical Incidence
TOTAL 7111,489 (4.8%) 4611,489 (3.1%) 116/1,489(7.8%)
SD (b) 4.29% 2.62% 5.56%
Range (c)
High 9/50 5/50 (d) 14/50
Low 0150 0150 0149
TABLE D4b. HISTORICAL INCIDENCE OF PITUITARY GLAND TUMORS IN FEMALE B6C3F1 MICE
ADMINISTERED CORN OIL BY GAVAGE (a)
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
Overall Historical Incidence
Range (e)
High 18/49 5/47 18/49
LOW 2/44 0149 2/44
No 2-year studies by Physiological Research Laboratories are included in the historical data base.
Range (c)
High 21/50 21/50
Low 4/50 4/50
INTEGUMENTARY SYSTEM
*Skin
(50) (49) (50)
Ulcer, NOS
1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic
1 (2%)
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
*Nasal cavity (50) (49) (50)
Hemorrhage 6 (12%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration 3 (6%) 3 (6%) 8 (16%)
Inflammation, acute 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic 2 (4%)
Metaplasia, squamous 1 (2%)
*Nasal turbinate
(50) (49) (50)
Hemorrhage
1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic
3 (6%)
#Trachea
(50) (49) (50)
Mineralization
1 (2%)
#Lunghronchiole
(50) (49) (50)
Hyperplasia, NOS
1 (2%)
#Lung (50) (49) (50)
Mineralization 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Congestion, NOS 1 (2%) 11 (22%)
Hemorrhage 12 (24%) 3 (6%) 12 (24%)
Bronchopneumonia, NOS 13 (26%) 24 (49%) 18 (36%)
Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration 2 (4%) 1 (2%) 9 (18%)
Pneumonia, interstitial chronic 1 (2%)
Cholesterol deposit 4 (8%) 5 (10%) 6 (12%)
Hyperplasia, alveolar epithelium 11 (22%) 28 (57%) 16 (32%)
Histiocytosis 16 (32%) 30 (61%) 17 (34%)
HEMATOPOIETIC SYSTEM
#Brain (50) (49) (50)
Lymphocytosis 1 (2%)
*Multiple organs (50) (49) (50)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid 1 (2%)
#Bone marrow
(50) (49) (50)
Fibrosis
15 (30%) 16 (33%) 12 (24%)
Hyperplasia, granulocytic
32 (64%) 28 (57%) 10 (20%)
#Spleen
(50) (49) (50)
Pigmentation, NOS
5 (10%) 4 (8%) 5 (10%)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid
19 (38%) 15 (31%) 6 (12%)
Hematopoiesis
10 (20%1 9 (18%) 2 (4%)
#Lymph node
(50) (47) (48)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid
1 (2%)
#Mandibular lymph node
(50) (47) (48)
Hemosiderosis
1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid
8 (16%) 4 (9%) 1 (2%)
#Mesenteric lymph node
(50) (47) (48)
Congestion, NOS
1 (2%)
Inflammation, acute
2 (4%)
Hyperplasia, reticulum cell
1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, lymphoid
8 (16%) 6 (13%)
Hematopoiesis
1 (2%)
Congestion, NOS
Hyperplasia, lymphoid
#Liver
Hematopoiesis
#Ovary/parovarian
Hyperplasia, lymphoid
#Thymus
Cyst, NOS
Hyperplasia, lymphoid
CIRCULATORY SYSTEM
*Multiple organs (50)
Periarteritis 2 (4%)
#Mesenteric lymph node (50)
Thrombosis, NOS 1 (2%)
#Heart
(50)
(49) (50)
Mineralization
1 (2%) 1 (2%)
Thrombosis, NOS
1 (2%)
Embolus, septic
1 (2%)
Inflammation, acute
1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic
7 (14%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
*Pulmonary vein
(50)
(49) (50)
Mineralization
1 (2%)
Thrombosis, NOS
1 (2%)
#Ovary
(50) (48) (46)
Thrombosis, NOS
1 (2%)
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
*Pulp of tooth (50) (49) (50)
URINARY SYSTEM
#Kidney (50) (49) (50)
Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration 1 (2%) 3 (6%) 9 (18%)
Pyelonephritis, acute 1 (2%)
Inflammation, chronic 3 (6%) 3 (6%) 2 (4%)
Glomerulonephritis, chronic 1 (2%)
Infarct, focal 1 (2%)
#Kidney/cortex (50) (49) (50)
Metaplasia, osseous 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%)
#Kidney/glomerulus (50) (49) (50)
Amy Ioidosis 1 (2%)
# Kidneykubule (50) (49) (50)
Mineralization 1 (2%) 6 (12%) 4 (8%)
Dilatation, NOS 2 (4%) 5 (10%) 5 (10%)
Nephrosis, cholemic 1 (2%)
Necrosis, NOS 4 (8%) 7 (14%) 4 (8%)
Pigmentation, NOS 1 (2%)
Regeneration, NOS 18 (36%) 15 (31%) 14 (28%)
#Urinary bladder (50) (49) (49)
Calculus, microscopic examination 1 (2%)
Hemorrhage 1 (2%)
Lymphocytic inflammatory infiltration 1 (2%) 2 (4%)
Inflammation, chronic
Hyperplasia, epithelial
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
#Anterior pituitary (49) (49) (49)
Cyst, NOS 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Multiple cysts 1 (2%)
Hemorrhagic cyst 2 (4%)
Focal cellular change 1 (2%)
Hyperplasia, NOS 16 (33%) 14 (29%) 12 (24%)
Angiectasis 1 (2%)
#Adrenal (50)
(47) (50)
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM
*Mammary gland (50)
(49) (50)
NERVOUS SYSTEM
#Brain (50) (49) (50)
Compression, NOS 2 (4%) 1 (2%)
Mineralization 23 (46%) 26 (53%) 9 (18%)
Congestion, NOS 1 (2%)
Infarct, NOS 1 (2%)
#Braidthalamus (50) (49) (50)
Malacia 1 (2%)
MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM
*Bone (50) (49) (50)
Fibrous osteodystrophy 1 (2%)
BODY CAVITIES
+Pleura (50) (49) (50)
Vegetable foreign body 1 (2%)
*Mesentery (60) (49) (50)
Steatitis 6 (12%) 7 (14%) 2 (4%)
Inflammation, chronic 1 (2%)
* Number of animals receiving complete necropsy examinations; all gross lesions including masses examined microscopically.
# Number of animals examined microscopically a t thissite
GENETIC TOXICOLOGY OF
2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE
PAGE
Revertants/plate (b)
-s 9 t 10% S9 (hamster) t 10% S9(rat)
Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3
R e v e r t a n t s h l a t e (b)
Strain Dose - 59 t 10% S9 (hamster) t 10% S9 (rat)
(pdplate) Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 1 Trial 2
(a)The detailed protocol is presented in Haworth et al. (1983). Cells and study compound or solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide) were
incubated in the absence of exogenous metabolic activation t -S9) o r with Aroclor 1254-induced S9 from male Syrian hamster
liver or male Sprague Dawley rat liver. High dose was limited by toxicity or solubility but did not exceed 10 mg/plate;
tb) Revertants are presented a s mean f standard error from three plates.
- s9
Trial 1
Ethanol (d) 91.5 f 3.6 100.0 f 3.4 61.5 f 3.7 22.5 f 1.7
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole 30 84.3 f 5.5 86.7 f 5.5 68.0 f 4.0 27.0 f 2.1
40 76.0 f 7.2 74.3 f 3.4 62.0 f 2.1 28.0 f 2.5
50 81.0 f 11.0 57.0 f 5.0 74.5 f 8.5 31.5 f 7.5
60 85.7 f 4.4 63.3 f 3.8 54.0 f 5.3 21.3 f 3.2
80 82.7 f 4.7 51.0 f 5.6 81.7 f 8.3 32.7 f 2.9
100 76.7 f 3.5 33.7 f 0.7 77.3 f 8.1 34.0 f 5.0
150 Lethal __
Methyl methanesulfonate 5 47.0 f 7.9 28.0 f 6.2 264.3 f 21.3 (e)197.0 k 34.6
Trial 2
Ethanol (d) 103.5 f 4.6 100.3 4 2.4 80.5 f 4.7 26.0 f 0.8
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole 40 84.0 f 12.8 26.3 4 10.3 63.3 f 3.8 26.7 f 4.1
60 91.3 f 11.5 18.0 f 3.2 51.7 f 12.7 19.0 f 4.0
80 89.7 4 12.8 14.3 ? 2.4 100.3 f 28.3 36.0 f 5.5
(f) 100 63.0 f 3.0 6.0 f 0.0 64.5 f 4.5 34.5 f 0.5
120 Lethal __ __ __
Methyl methanesulfonate 5 56.7 f 2.7 31.0 f 2.1 662.7 k 16.2 (e)393.0 f 19.3
+sg (g)
Trial 1
Ethanol (d) 84.3 f 6.8 100.0 f 4.4 196.5 f 8.9 79.0 f 7.4
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole 1.25 68.0 f 4.5 65.3 f 1.5 137.3 f 33.5 65.7 f 13.0
2.5 67.3 f 4.7 69.7 f 2.0 103.7 f 6.4 51.7 f 1.3
5 90.0 f 12.1 56.7 f 3.9 101.0 f 19.1 38.0 f 5.9
7.5 88.7 f 3.8 33.3 f 2.4 192.7 f -6.0 72.7 f 4.3
10 86.7 f 3.3 24.0 f 1.0 226.7 f 12.3 87.7 f 7.3
15 79.0 f 4.2 12.0 f 2.0 307.3 f 55.5 (e) 130.3 k 24.3
Methylcholanthrene 2.5 36.0 f 10.7 19.0 f 10.0 528.3 k 74.0 (e)537.0 k 74.1
Trial 2
Ethanol 81.0 f 3.0 100.3 ? 6.1 86.3 4 5.2 35.7 k 0.9
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole 5 79.0 f 6.1 85.0 f 10.5 155.7 f 5.0 (e)66.0 f 4.2
6 73.3 f 4.7 59.7 f 10.7 149.0
~ f 10.1
~
~ - - (e)69.7
,._ ... f
- 9.7
8 81.0 f 8.7 48.3 f 4.2 140.0 f 16.0 (e)58.0 f 316
10 83.0 f 9.9 35.7 f 2.2 250.3 f 9.0 (e) 104.0 f 14.4
12 75.0 f 9.0 29.0 f 4.5 218.3 f 15.2 ( e ) 100.0 k 15.6
16 68.3 f 4.8 21.3 f 2.3 144.0 f 57.4 (e169.3 f 28.0
Methylcholanthrene 2.5 73.0 f 13.1 46.0 f 9.0 589.0 f 55.5 (e)277.3 f 25.1
Trial 3
Ethanol (d) 97.5 k 3.7 100.3 4 4.8 113.8 f 1.0 39.0 f 1.8
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole 4 82.7 f 2.2 71.0 f 5.5 139.3 f 5.9 56.0 f 1.5
8 87.3 f 13.3 59.0 f 8.0 140.7 f 24.5 53.3 f 2.7
146.7 i 56.7 3 5.5
10
12
16
87.3 f
70.3 f
82.3 f
10.5
4.1
3.9
49.0
33.7
30.3
**
k 4.2
0.9
2.2
141.3 f
i8.2
18.7 (e)66.7 f 7.2
184.3 5 15.0 (e)74.7 k 2.8
20 87.7 f 8.3 21.0 f 1.7 189.0 f 16.7 (e172.0 f 4.0
Methylcholanthrene 2.5 72.7 f 4.2 42.3 f 3.4 706.7 f 81.4 (e)324.7 k 31.4
(a)Study performed at Litton Bionetics, Inc. The experimental protocol is presented in detail by Myhr et al. (1985)and follows
the basic format of Clive e t al. (1979).The highest dose ofstudy compound is determined by solubility or toxicity and may not
exceed 5 mg/ml. All doses are tested in triplicate; unless otherwise specified, the average for the three tests is presented in the
table. Cells (6 X 10Vml) were treated for 4 hours a t 37” C in medium, washed, resuspended in medium, and incubated for 48
hours at 37”C. After expression, 3 X 106cells were plated in medium and soft agar supplemented with trifluorothymidine for
selection of cells that were mutant a t the thymidine kinase (TK) locus, and 600 cells were plated in nonselective medium and
soft agar to determine the cloning efficiency.
(b)Mean k standard error of replicate trials for approximately 3 X 106 cells each. All data are evaluated statistically for both
trend and peak response (P<0.05 for a t least one of the three highest dose sets). Both responses must be significantly (P<0.05)
positive for a chemical to be considered mutagenic. If only one of these responses is significant, the call is “questionable”; the
absence of both trend and peak response results in a “negative” call.
(c)Mutant fraction (frequency)is a ratio of the mutant count to the cloning efficiency, divided by 3 (to arrive at MF per 1 x 108
cells treated); MF = mutant fraction.
(d) Data presented are the average of four tests.
(e) Significant positive response; occurs when the relative mutant fraction (average MF of treated culture/average MF of sol-
(D Data presented are the average oftwo tests; doses in one test were lethal.
(g) Tests conducted with metabolic activation were performed as described in (a) except that S9, prepared from the liver of
Aroclor 1254-inducedF344 rats, was added at the same time a s the study chemical and/or solvent (ethanol).
-89 (c)
Trial No. 1.-Summary: Negative
Dimethyl sulfoxide 50 1,035 500 0.48 10.0 25.3 ..
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole 12.5 50 1,036 47 1 0.46 9.4 (d132.6 94.0
14.9 50 1,027 515 0.50 10.3 (d)32.6 103.0
20.1
24.8
50
0 __
1,025 568
..
0.55
..
11.4
..
(d)32,6
-.
114.0
-.
Mitomycin C 0.001 50 1,027 741 0.72 14.8 26.3 148.0
0.010 5 104 205 1.97 41.0 26.3 410.0
t S 9 (e)
Trial No. 1--Summary: Positive
Dimethyl sulfoxide 50 1,038 477 0.46 9.5 25.3 __
2-Mercaptobenzothia2ole 99.2 50 1,028 53 1 0.52 10.6 25.3 111.6
247.5 50 1,026 536 0.52 10.7 25.3 112.6
501.6
750
50
0 __
1,045 640
.. __
0.61 12.8
.- __
(d)32.6 134.7
.-
Cyclophosphamide 0.4 50 1,020 634 0.62 12.7 25.3 133.7
2.0 5 104 142 1.37 28.4 26.3 298.9
(a) Study performed a t Litton Bionetics, Inc. SCE = sister chromatid exchange; BrdU = bromodeoxyuridine4 A detailed de-
scription ofthe SCE protocol is presented by Galloway e t al. (1985). Briefly, Chinese hamster ovary cells were incubated with
study compound or solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide) a8 described in (c) or (d) below and cultured for sufncient time to reach second
metaphase division. Cells were then collected by mitotic shake-off, fixed, air-dried, and stained.
(b)SCEs/cell in treated culture expressed a s a percent of the SCEs/cell in the control culture
(c)In the absence ofS9, Chinese hamster ovary cella were incubated with s t d y compound or solvent for 2 hours a t 37' C. Then
BrdU was added, and incubation was continued for 24 hours. Cells were washed, fresh medium containing BrdU and colcemid
wan added, and incubation was continuedfor 2.3 hours.
(d) Because of significant chemically induced cell cycle delay, incubation time before addition of colcemid was lengthened to
provide sufficient metaphases a t harvest.
(e) In the presence of SS,cells were incubated with study compound or solvent for 2 hours at 37'C. Then cells were washed, and
medium containing BrdU was added. Cells were incubated for a further 26 hours, with colcemid preeent for the final 2-3 houre.
S9 was from the liver ofAroclor 1254-inducedmale Sprague Dawley rata.
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole
Mitomycin C Cyclophosphamide
50 1 0.02 2
2-Mercaptobenzothiazole
373.5 25 12 0.48 24
399 25 17 0.68 28
425 25 21 0.84 28
450 0
Summary: Positive
Cyclophosphamide
3.8 50 3 0.06 6
12.5 25 9 0.36 20
(a)Study performed a t Litton Bionetics, Inc. Abs = aberrations. A detailed presentation ofthe technique for detecting chromo-
somal aberrations is found in Galloway et al. (1985). Briefly, Chinese hamster ovary cells were incubated with study compound
or solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide) a s indicated in ( b )or (c). Cells were arrested in first metaphase by addition of colcemid and har-
vested by mitotic shake-off, fixed, and stained in 6%Giemsa.
(b)In the absence ofS9, Chinese hamster ovary cells were incubated with study compound or solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide) for 8-
10 hours a t 37" C. Cells were then washed, and fresh mediutn containing colcemid was added for a n additional 2-3 hours fol-
lowed by harvest.
(c)In the presence ofS9, cells were incubated with study compound or solvent (dimethyl sulfoxide) for 2 hours a t 37OC. Cells
were then washed, medium was added, and incubation was continued for 8-10 hours. Colcemid was added for the last 2-3 hours
of incubation before harvest, S9 was from the liver ofAroclor 1254-induced male Sprague Dawley rats.
td) Because of significant chemically induced cell cycle delay, incubation time before addition of colcemid was lengthened to
provide sufficient metaphases a t harvest.
PAGE
TABLE F1 MURINE ANTIBODY DETERMINATIONS FOR RATS AND MICE IN THE TWO-YEAR
GAVAGE STUDIES OF 2-MERCAPTOBENZOTHIAZOLE 163
I. Methods
Rodents used in the Carcinogenesis Program of the National Toxicology Program are produced in op-
timally clean facilities to eliminate potential pathogens that may affect study results. The Sentinel
Animal Program is part of the periodic monitoring of animal health that occurs during the toxicologic
evaluation of chemical compounds. Under this program, the disease state of the rodents is monitored
via serology on sera from extra (sentinel) animals in the study rooms. These animals are untreated,
and these animals and the study animals are both subject to identical environmental conditions. The
sentinel anirrials come from the same production source and weanling groups as the animals used for
the studies of chemical compounds.
Fifteen B6C3F1 mice and 15 F344/N rats of each sex are selected at the time of randomization and al-
location of the animals to the various study groups. Five animals of each designated sentinel group
are killed a t 6,12, and 18 months on study. Data from animals surviving 24 months are collected
from 5/50 randomly selected control animals of each sex and species. The blood from each animal is
collected and clotted, and the serum is separated. The serum is cooled on ice and shipped to Microbio-
logical Associates’ Comprehensive Animal Diagnostic Service for determination of the antibody ti-
ters. The following tests are performed:
Hemagglutination Complement
Inhibition Fixation ELISA
Mice PVM (pneumonia virus of mice) M. Ad. (mouse adenovirus) MHV (mouse
Reo 3 (reovirus type 3) LC M (1ymphocy tic hepatitis virus)
GDVII (Theiler’s choriomeningitis virus) M . pul. (Mycoplasma
encephalomyelitis virus) pulrnonis) (24 mo)
Poly (polyoma virus)
MVM (minute virus of mice)
Ectro (infectious ectromelia)
Sendai
II. Results
Results are presented in Table F1.
RATS
6 8/10 Sendai
12 10110 Sendai
18 1/10 Sendai
24 10110 (b)M.pul.
4110 Sendai
MICE
6 9/10 Sendai
12 10/10 Sendai
18 5/10 Sendai
24 6/10 Sendai
(a) Blood samples were taken from sentinel animals a t 6,12, and 18 months aRer the start ofdosing and from the vehicle control
animals just before they were killed; samples were sent to Microbiological Associates (Bethesda, MD) for determination of anti-
body titers.
(b) Further evaluation of this assay indicated that it is not specific for M.pulrnonis, and these results are considered false
positive.
CONTAMINANT LEVELS
PAGE
TABLE 6 1 INGREDIENTS OF NIH 07 RAT AND MOUSE RATION 166
TABLE C2 VITAMINS AND MINERALS IN NIH 07 RAT AND MOUSE RATION 166
TABLE G2. VITAMINS AND MINERALS IN NIH 07 RAT AND MOUSE RATION (a)
Amount Source
Vitamins
A 5,500,000 IU Stabilized vitamin A palmitate or acetate
4,600,000 IU D-activated animal sterol
Niacin 30.0 g
Riboflavin 3.4 g
B12 4,000 pg
Minerals
Iron 120.0 g Iron sulfate
~~~
Mean k Standard
Nutrients Deviation Range Number of Samples
Arachidonic 0.008 __ 1
Vitamins
Minerals
~~
Mean f Standard
Contaminants Deviation
Range N u m b e r of Samples
Pesticides (ppm)
(a) Mean, standard deviation, and range exclude two high values of 2.66 ppm and 3.37 ppm obtained for batches produced on
8/26/81 andon7/21/82.
(b)Mean,standard deviation, and range include the high values given in (a).
(c)All values were less than the detection limit. The detection limit is given as the mean.
(d) Sources of contamination: alfalfa, grains, and fish meal
(e) Sources of contamination: soy oil and fish meal
(0CFU =colony forming unit
(g)MPN = most probable number; mean, standard deviation, and range exclude one high value of 460 MPN/g obtained for the
batch produced on 9/23/82.
(h) Mean, standard deviation, and range include the high value listed in (g).
(i)All values were less than 3 MPNlg.
(i)BHC = hexachlorocyclohexane or benzene hexachloride
(k)Two observations were above the detection limit. The values and the d a b 8 they were obtained are given under the range.
(1)Eleven batches contained more than 0.06 ppm.
(m)Four batches (7/22/81-11/25/81) were not analyzed for endosulfan I, endosulfan II, or endorulfan rulfate.
APPENDIX W
AUDIT SUMMARY
The experimental data, pathology materials, and draft NTP Technical Report for the 2-year studies of
2-mercaptobenzothiazole in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice were examined for accuracy, consistency,
and completeness. The studies were conducted for the NTP by Physiological Research Laboratories
(Minneapolis, Minnesota) under a subcontract with Tracor Jitco, Inc. (Rockville, Maryland), until
February 28, 1983, and then under a contract with the National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences (NIEHS). Animal exposures for the 2-year studies began in July 1981, about 3 months prior
to the date (October 1, 1981) when the NTP required studies to be conducted in full compliance with
the FDA Good Laboratory Practice regulations for nonclinical laboratory studies. The retrospective
audit was conducted for the NIEHS a t the NTP Archives in September and October 1986 by Dynamac
Corporation, J.C. Bhandari, D.V.M., Ph.D., Principal Investigator. Other individuals who conducted
the audit are listed in the full report, which is on file a t the NIEHS. The data audit included a review
All records concerning animal receipt, quarantine, randomization, and disposition prior to
study start.
Body weight and clinical observation data for a random 10%sample of the study animals.
All inlife records concerning environmental conditions, palpable masses, mortality, and ani-
mal identification.
All postmortem records for individual animals concerning identification, disposition codes,
condition codes, and correlation between necropsy observations and histopathologic findings.
Wet tissues from a random 10% sample of the study animals to verify animal identification
Slides and blocks of tissues from all vehicle control and high dose animals to examine for
The audit showed that inlife procedures were documented in the Materials and Methods Report sub-
mitted by the study laboratory and by archival records with the exception of periodic animal room
procedures for cage and rack changes, equipment sanitization, light cycle, twice daily morbidity and
moribundity checks, and animal dosing for the first several months. The analytical chemistry records
from the study laboratory were complete and accurate, but raw data for the initial characterization of
2-mercaptobenzothiazole by Midwest Research Institute were not present at the Archives for the au-
dit. Review of the pathology documents resulted in a change in disposition code for 10 mice from nat-
ural death or moribund kill to accidental death because of gavage trauma. Review of the pathology
specimens revealed only miscellaneous findings that were not significant to the interpretation of the
study results.
In summary, the findings of the data audit were adequately resolved or were considered not to affect
the interpretation of these studies. Thus, the retrospective audit, coupled with audit of the draft
Technical Report, shows that the records and specimens for the 2-year studies of 2-mercaptobenzo-
thiazole support the data and results presented in this NTP Technical Report.
233 2-Biphenylamine Hydrochloride 310 Marine Diesel Fuel and JP-5 Navy Fuel
26 1 Chlorobenzene
These NTP Technical Reporta are available for sale from the National Technical Information Service, U.S.Department of
Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161 (703-487-4650). Single copies of this Technical Report are avail-
able without charge (and while supplies last) from the NTP Public Information Ofice, National Toxicology Program, P.O.
Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.