Role of Judiciary

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Environmental Law

Class: B.A.LL.B. Semester: Vth


Faculty Incharge: Dr.Puja Jaiswal
[email protected]
Topic
⚫ Remédies Under Indian Legal Framework vis-
à-vis Environmental Protection

The need for protection and conservation of


environment and sustainable use of natural
resources is reflected in the constitutional
framework of India and also in the
international commitments of India.
Remédies vis-à-vis Environment Protection

•General Legal Provisions relating to Control of Pollution


•Remedies under Specific Laws regarding Environment Protection
General Legal Provisions relating to Control of Pollution

•Under the Indian Constitution


•Under Common law
•Under the Penal Laws
•Under the Civil Laws

Remedies under Specific Laws regarding Environment Protection- Few


Imp Legislations

•The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974


•The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
•The Environment Protection Act, 1986
•The National Green Tribunal Act, 2010
•The Hazardous Waste Management Regulations namely:
•Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Transboundary) Rules,
2008
•Biomedical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998
•Municipal Solid Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2000
General Legal Provisions relating to Control
of Pollution

Remedies available under


Under the Indian Constitution
common law

Remedies under the Penal Laws Remedies under the Civil Law
Constitution provisions vis-à-vis
Environment Protection

Art. 21 Article 48-A Art. 51-A sub-clause


(g)
•Right to life •the State shall •It shall be the duty of
guaranteed by article Endeavour to protect every citizen of India
21 of the and improve the to protect and improve
Constitution to environment and to the natural
include the right to a safeguard the forests environment including
wholesome and wildlife of the forests, lakes, rivers
environment country and wildlife and to
have compassion for
living creatures
Important Judgements
Charan Lal Sahu v. UOI, AIR 1990 SC 1480
⚫ Supreme Court interpreted the right to life guaranteed
by Article 21 of the Constitution to include the right to
a wholesome environment.
⚫ National dimensions of human rights, right to life,
liberty, pollution free air and water is guaranteed by
the Constitution under Articles 21, 48A and 51(g), it is
the duty of the State to take effective steps to protect
the constitutional rights guaranteed.
⚫ Doctrine of 'parens patriae‘
⚫ Ground of forum non conveniens
Important Judgements
Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar, AIR 1991 SC 420/
1991 (1) SCC 598,
⚫ Court observed that 'right to life guaranteed by article
21 includes the right of enjoyment of pollution-free
water and air for full enjoyment of life.
⚫ Rejected the petition, the Supreme Court held that it
would only accept PIL petitions filed by persons
“genuinely interested in the protection of society on
behalf of the community . . . not to satisfy . . . personal
grudge and enmity.”
Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar, AIR 1991 SC
420/ 1991 (1) SCC 598
⚫ Although the Supreme Court rejected a PIL petition, the
Court reiterated that Article 21 includes a right to
environmental protection and observed as follows:
⚫ Right to life is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the
Constitution and it includes the right of enjoyment of
pollution free water and air for full enjoyment of life. If
anything endangers or impairs that quality of life in
derogation of laws, a citizen has right to have recourse to
Article 32 of the Constitution for removing the pollution of
water or air which may be detrimental to the quality of life .
⚫ Queries
⚫ To be contd/-
Important Judgements
⚫ In Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra vs.
State of U.P. (1987) 1 SCR 641 ,
⚫ a non-governmental organization initiated a PIL
through a letter to the Indian Supreme Court,
documenting the adverse effects of illegal limestone
quarrying in the Mussorrie-Dehradun area
⚫ the Supreme Court prohibited continuance of mining
operations terming it to be adversely affecting the
environment.
⚫ set up an expert committee to prepare a report for the
Court on the issue
Important Judgements
⚫ In Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action vs. Union of India,
the Supreme Court cautioned the industries discharging
inherently dangerous Oleum and H acid. The court held that such
type of pollution infringes right to wholesome environment and
ultimately right to life.
⚫ In Church of God (Full Gospel)in India vs.KKR Majestic
Colony Welfare Association, the Supreme Court observed that
noise pollution amounts to violation of Art.21 of the Constitution.
⚫ In A P Pollution Control Board (II) v Prof M V Nayudu, (2001)
2 SCC 62
Supreme Court observed that the right to have access to drinking
water is fundamental to life and it is the duty of the State under
Art 21 to provide clean drinking water to its citizens.
Important Judgements
⚫ MC Mehta v Union of India, 1998 (6) SCC 60 and
1998 (9) SCC 589,
⚫ Court said that clean air is a part of ‘right to life’ and
directed the Delhi Government, to convert the buses
in Delhi to Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) to protect
the people from air pollution.
⚫ In Noise Pollution v In Re, (2005) 5 SCC 733
⚫ Court ruled that freedom from noise pollution was
part of ‘right to life’ guaranteed by Article 21.
⚫ Queries
⚫ To be contd/-

You might also like