Catenary Pantograph and Their Interaction
Catenary Pantograph and Their Interaction
Catenary Pantograph and Their Interaction
Tore Dahlberg
To cite this article: Tore Dahlberg (2006) Catenary, pantograph, and their interaction, Vehicle
System Dynamics, 44:8, 591-593, DOI: 10.1080/00423110600735894
Editorial
Nowadays many railway trains use electric traction. The electric power is transferred to the
locomotive by an overhead current supply system, the catenary system, and the power is
transmitted down to the motors via a pantograph that is mounted on the roof of the locomotive.
The current collection system should provide an uninterrupted current flow from the catenary
system to the locomotive. The current supply must be reliable and of good quality.
Mechanically, the pantograph on the locomotive and the overhead current supply system
on the track are two dynamic systems that interact with each other through the contact force
acting on a collector strip of the pantograph head. This gives a force moving along the contact
wire and, because of the staggered alignment of the contact wire, the contact force is moving
(sideways) on the collector strip as well. Owing to geometrical and other irregularities in the
track and in the catenary system, the contact force will be irregular in time, causing dynamic
excitation of the pantograph and the catenary system.
A catenary system generally consists of a contact wire that is supported in a messenger (or
support) wire. The vertical connections between the messenger and the contact wires are called
droppers, and their lengths are adjusted so that the contact wire becomes as horizontal as
possible. However, because of the separation of the droppers (normally, the distance between
the droppers is about 10 m), the contact wire will sag a little between the droppers. The
messenger and contact wires are supported by masts at the side of the track. By the support
structure, the wires are given a staggered alignment to avoid centralized contact abrasion of
the current-collector strip on the pantograph.
The variation of distance from wire to track produces, especially at high train speed,
undesirable dynamic behaviour of both the wire and the collector and pantograph. Oscillations
of both take place, and the connection between them may break, causing excessive arcing and
wear with attendant loss of power transmission. Stitching the wire to a stouter supporting wire
can minimize the bounce of both collector and wire and assure a more reliable current flow.
2. The pantograph
Formerly, the pantograph geometry was seen in the collapsible parallel linkage used on electric
locomotives to keep a current-collector bar in contact with the overhead wire. Two such
congruent linkages in planes parallel to the train’s motion were affixed on top of the locomotive.
An uppermost horizontal member collected the current. Springs pushed the configuration
upwards to give contact between the current-collector and the contact wire.
Nowadays, a pantograph is generally composed of a lower arm, an upper arm, a pantograph
head, and connections between them. On modern pantographs, two collector strips are mounted
with soft springs on the pantograph head and the head itself is mounted with flexible mountings
on an articulated framework (the lower and upper arms). The articulated frame is free to move
in a vertical plane and is spring-loaded so that, irrespective of the wire height over the roof of
the vehicle, the pantograph could provide a constant contact force between the collector strips
and the contact wire.
3. Problems
As mentioned, the current collection system should provide an uninterrupted current flow from
the catenary system to the locomotive, but because of oscillations in the contact wire and in
the pantograph, the contact force between the two will be irregular and the contact may even
be broken. There are many sources that contribute to creating an irregular contact force.
When starting a train, a large amount of current should be supplied within a very short
portion of the contact wire. This will induce heating of the wire and may damage it. A weak
spot on the wire may thus be created.
When the collector strip slides along the contact wire, the pantograph will perceive an
irregular stiffness (in the vertical direction) from the contact wire. The irregular stiffness is
caused by the droppers and by the sagging of the contact wire between the droppers. The
droppers (with their fastenings) also induce an irregular mass distribution along the contact
wire. This generates variations of the contact force and vibrations in the two systems. Also,
the catenary system is divided into sections of, say, 1200 m, with some overlap of the contact
wires at the ends of the sections. At these overlaps, the height, stiffness, and mass distribution
of the contact wire(s) will differ from that along the line, and this will also induce irregularities
of the contact force.
When the pantograph enters a new section of the contact wire, and moves along it, tra-
velling waves in the contact wire are generated. These waves move faster than the train, both
forwards and backwards, and they are reflected at the wire ends to meet or to catch-up with
the pantograph, and these irregularities will induce variations in the contact force.
Variations in the contact force between the pantograph and the contact wire create problems.
If the contact force goes down to zero, electromagnetic disturbances due to sparkling appear.
If the contact force is too large, the contact wire uplift may exceed allowable limits and may
even be torn down. Also, the wear of the contact wire and the collector strip(s) is influenced by
the contact force. Thus, to avoid excessive wire uplift and wear (due to friction), the contact
force should be small, but to avoid electromagnetic disturbances, the contact force should be
large. As seen, these requirements are conflicting. In order to achieve a good compromise, the
dynamic behaviour of the two systems, the pantograph and the overhead system, and their
interaction need to be properly understood.
To better understand and improve the dynamic performance of the pantograph and the
catenary system, and their interaction, mathematical simulation tools are of great help.
Editorial 593
Tore Dahlberg
Linköping University, Sweden