10 Common Leadership Styles (Plus How To Find Your Own) : The Importance of Developing A Leadership Style
10 Common Leadership Styles (Plus How To Find Your Own) : The Importance of Developing A Leadership Style
10 Common Leadership Styles (Plus How To Find Your Own) : The Importance of Developing A Leadership Style
At some point in your career, you may take on a leadership role. Whether you’re leading
a meeting, a project, a team or an entire department, you might consider identifying with
or adopting a defined leadership style.
Most professionals develop their own style of leadership based on factors like
experience and personality, as well as the unique needs of their company and its
organizational culture. While every leader is different, there are 10 leadership styles
commonly used in the workplace.
In this article, we will cover the 10 most common leadership styles and provide
examples and common characteristics of each to help you determine which leadership
style you most identify with.
Show Transcript
By taking the time to familiarize yourself with each of these types of leadership, you
might recognize certain areas to improve upon or expand your own leadership style.
You can also identify other ways to lead that might better serve your current goals and
understand how to work with managers who follow a different style than your own.
Image description
In the next section, we'll look at each leadership style in detail in including benefits,
challenges and examples of each.
A coaching leader is someone who can quickly recognize their team members’
strengths, weaknesses and motivations to help each individual improve. This type of
leader often assists team members in setting smart goals and then provides regular
feedback with challenging projects to promote growth. They’re skilled in setting clear
expectations and creating a positive, motivating environment.
The coach leadership style is one of the most advantageous for employers as well as
the employees they manage. Unfortunately, it’s often also one of the most underused
styles—largely because it can be more time-intensive than other types of leadership.
Are supportive
Offer guidance instead of giving commands
Value learning as a way of growing
Ask guided questions
Balance relaying knowledge and helping others find it themselves
Are self-aware
Example: A sales manager gathers their team of account executives for a meeting to
discuss learnings from the previous quarter. They start the meeting by completing an
assessment of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats regarding the team’s
performance.
The manager then recognizes specific team members for exceptional performance and
goes over the goals achieved by the team. Finally, the manager closes the meeting by
announcing a contest to start the next quarter, motivating the salespeople to reach their
goals.
Visionary leaders have a powerful ability to drive progress and usher in periods of
change by inspiring employees and earning trust for new ideas. A visionary leader is
also able to establish a strong organizational bond. They strive to foster confidence
among direct reports and colleagues alike.
Benefits: Visionary leadership can help companies grow, unite teams and the overall
company and improve outdated technologies or practices.
Servant leaders live by a people-first mindset and believe that when team members feel
personally and professionally fulfilled, they’re more effective and more likely to regularly
produce great work. Because of their emphasis on employee satisfaction and
collaboration, they tend to achieve higher levels of respect.
Servant style is an excellent leadership style for organizations of any industry and size
but is especially prevalent within nonprofits. These types of leaders are exceptionally
skilled in building employee morale and helping people re-engage with their work.
Benefits: Servant leaders have the capacity to boost employee loyalty and productivity,
improve employee development and decision-making, cultivate trust and create future
leaders.
Challenges: Servant leaders can become burnt-out as they often put the needs of their
team above their own They may have a hard time being authoritative when they need to
be.
Example: A product manager hosts monthly one-on-one coffee meetings with everyone
that has concerns, questions or thoughts about improving or using the product. This
time is meant for her to address the needs of and help those who are using the product
in any capacity.
Also called the “authoritarian style of leadership,” this type of leader is someone who is
focused primarily on results and efficiency. They often make decisions alone or with a
small, trusted group and expect employees to do exactly what they’re asked. It can be
helpful to think of these types of leaders as military commanders.
Have self-confidence
Are self-motivated
Communicate clearly and consistently
Follow the rules
Are dependable
Value highly structured environments
Believe in supervised work environments
Challenges: Autocratic leaders are often prone to high levels of stress because they
feel responsible for everything. Since they lack flexibility and often do not want to hear
others’ ideas, these leaders are often resented by the team.
Example: Before an operation, the surgeon carefully recounts the rules and processes
of the operation room with every team member who will be helping during the surgery.
She wants to ensure everyone is clear on the expectations and follows each procedure
carefully and exactly so the surgery goes as smoothly as possible.
Laissez-faire style is the opposite of the autocratic leadership type, focusing mostly on
delegating many tasks to team members and providing little to no supervision. Because
a laissez-faire leader does not spend their time intensely managing employees, they
often have more time to dedicate to other projects.
Managers may adopt this leadership style when all team members are highly
experienced, well-trained and require little oversight. However, it can also cause a dip in
productivity if employees are confused about their leader’s expectations, or if some
team members need consistent motivation and boundaries to work well.
Challenges: Laissez-faire leadership style does not work well for new employees, as
they need guidance and hands-on support in the beginning. This method can also lead
to a lack of structure, leadership confusion and employees not feeling properly
supported.
Example: When welcoming new employees, Keisha explains that her engineers can
set and maintain their own work schedules as long as they are tracking and hitting
goals they set together as a team. They are also free to learn about and participate in
projects outside of their team.
Because this type of leadership drives discussion and participation, it’s an excellent
style for organizations focused on creativity and innovation—such as the technology
industry.