Case Study On Bayer AG: Anthrax and Cipro: Group No. 5
Case Study On Bayer AG: Anthrax and Cipro: Group No. 5
Case Study On Bayer AG: Anthrax and Cipro: Group No. 5
Group no. 5
Analyzed by
Executive Summary:
After a brutal terrorist attack on 11th Sept 2001, USA was once again under a threat of
bioterrorism.On October 5th the first case of Anthrax was discovered at American media
Inc. at Florida.After that a series of events were reported in different parts of USA
regarding anthrax attacks. The Drug “Cipro” was in the limelight as an exclusive and
ultimate medicine for treatment of Anthrax.Cipro is the trade name of Ciprofloxacin
discovered in 1981, a USDFA approved drug used as an antibiotic to treat major
infections.After many researches it was considered to be a first line defence for
treatment of Anthrax related infections in year 2000.
.Cipro was produced by Bayer AG, a multinational healthcare and chemical group
having presence almost all around the world having 350 individual units.The
headquarter of Bayer AG was in Germany.Due to cultural differences between US and
Germany, Bayer AG was perceived to be a reserved an conservative in US. Also the
US media also had similar notions for the company.
Now being the only manufacturer and supplier of the drug “Cipro” the company faced
many problems from coping up with the manufacturing of the drug, to dealing with
political and public relations.Citizens of US were scared and their anxiety level was very
high. The approach of the officials of Bayer AG was conservative. As a result the
intensons and image of the company was under question including its motives and
ability to meet the demand of US as well as Canada.
Statement of Objective:
● How Bayer AG maintains its credibility and business in the United States and
explores the way to fulfill the demand for Cipro drugs in the challenging situation
of bioterrorism.
Decision Problem:
● How should Dr. Manfred Schneider keeps his company's credibility in the market,
protects the trust of the United States government, and ensures protecting the
lives of United States citizens by supplying enough quantities of Cipro medicine
in the market?
Decision criteria:
1. Attack on world trade center (Terrorist attack) on September 11, 2001, followed
by Anthrax attack (Biological terrorist attack) in October 2001. That causes
excessive anxiety and fear among people.
2. Reserved and ultra-conservative political, media, and public relations approach
of Bayer AG.
3. Perception of people towards a german company and past incidents eg. sudden
withdrawal of Kegonate without clarification.
4. Non-transparency about the available stock of the Cipro and other related
information.
5. German cultured pharma company Bayer AG could not act to meet American
culture.
Alternative solutions:
1. Bayer should share their Cipro drug production plan, share their present situation
and requirements with the United States government, and take help from the
United States government for uninterrupted production of the Cipro drug So that
it doesn't have the scarcity of any resources. As well as the patent of Cipro
medicine can be protected for future uses.
2. In a Bioterrorism-like situation, Bayer should mainly focus on the production of
Cipro drug only.
3. Bayer should go for third-party production of the drug to increase the production
and supply the market demand.
4. Bayer should sell the patent to other pharmaceutical firms to meet the demand of
the drug so that it can meet the demand.
5. Reduce the price of the Cipro drug and gain the trust of the United States
government and people.
Evaluation of alternatives:
1. It is quite possible that the United States government may distrust Bayer AD after
seeing the plan of production and can rescind the patent, also it is possible that
other companies may refuse to supply the required material to Bayer AG.
2. By converting other drug plants into the production of Cipro drugs, Bayer will be
able to manage the demand, but his business of other drugs will be highly
affected, which may lead to revenue shortages in the company
3. By outsourcing the production, Bayer AG may increase the production and meet
the demand of Cipro, however there will be questions about proper quality
checking. Third parties could not own any mishap if it happened due to drug
consumption. With that, there are chances of pilferage of patent details.
4. By selling the patent of the Cipro drug, Bayer can be the main centered company
to surpass the severity of the disease. This will also help to earn huge fame and
name in the United States Market. But in this case, the company will lose its
chance to convert crisis into opportunity, including business opportunity.
5. By reducing the price of drugs, the bulk of medicines will reach common people.
And it will be helpful for the future growth of the company.
● Bayer should reduce its selling price to the Federal government and should
clearly show its concern and stand for the crisis. Bayer AG should grab the
opportunity to be considered a hero. CIPRO (Ciprofloxacin) was discovered in
1981 and already a big seller drug for the treatment of a big range of serious
infections. With that, if they remain conservative then they may lose Patent also
as they lose sales in the Canadian market.
● They should approach the US government with this approach and ask the US
government to help for any production-related problem in order to overcome
manufacturing constraints. Looking towards a positive and American citizen
centric approach of the company, US government may provide adequate support
in manufacturing of “Cipra”
● They should come out with a transparent approach and should clarify their stand
that they are going for aggressive and increasing its production. Reduced prices
will show that they are not profit-making from terrorist activity. That will build a
strong image, will retain its patent, and reserves its sell as it is the only producer.
Contingency plan:
● Bayer AG shall go for legal protection for their Cipro medicine patent so that any
Government can’t interfere with it and in the meantime, they also ensure to
supply sufficient quantities as per demand at optimum price.