Scribd
Upload
78 views1 page

Engineering Grading Criteria

This document outlines grading criteria and scales for an engineering course at Ain Shams University in Egypt. It provides detailed criteria for assessing student work in categories of mastery, accomplishment, adequacy, and inadequacy. Conversion scales are also included to match grading percentages at Ain Shams University to those used at the University of East London.

Uploaded by

Alli Ahmed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
78 views1 page

Engineering Grading Criteria

This document outlines grading criteria and scales for an engineering course at Ain Shams University in Egypt. It provides detailed criteria for assessing student work in categories of mastery, accomplishment, adequacy, and inadequacy. Conversion scales are also included to match grading percentages at Ain Shams University to those used at the University of East London.

Uploaded by

Alli Ahmed
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

AIN SHAMS UNIVERSITY

I-Credit Hours Engineering Programs


([Link])

Problem solving marking criteria*


Differential
Course Course Equations and Assignment
PHM 112 3 Date: 30/12/2020
Code: Name: Numerical No.
Analysis
Student Student
Ali Ahmed Ali 19P6038
Name: ID:
Accomplished ≥75 &
Mastery ≥90% Adequate ≥60 & <75% Inadequate <60%
<90%
100 96 93 90 89 84 79 75 74 69 64 60 59 40 20 0
 Write down correctly all  Write down correctly all  Write down correctly all  Write down partially all
used equations and formula used equations and used equations and used equations and
 Substitute all given date formula formula formula
correctly  Substitute all given date  Substitute all given date  Substitute all given date
 Solve to get the required correctly correctly partially correctly
values correctly  Solve to get the required  Solve to get the required  Solve to get the required
 Using related SI units values correctly values values
 Draw related – sketches,  Using related SI units  Did not use related SI  Using related SI units
wave forms, items  Partially Draw related – units  Draw related – sketches,
arrangements, sketches, wave forms,  Partially Draw related – wave forms, items
 Comment in results items arrangements, sketches, wave forms, arrangements,
 Comment in results items arrangements,  Did not comment in
 Did not comment in results
results

ASU Agreed
1st marker Total 1st marker Signature
Mark
UEL Agreed
2nd Marker Total 2nd marker Signature
Mark
General Comments: UEL Grading System Agreed ASU Grading Scale
% equivalent at UEL Mark Range % at ASU Grade
95% and higher 97% and higher A+
82% to less than 95% 93% to less than 97% A
70% to less than 82% 89% to less than 93% A-
66% to less than 70% 84% to less than 89% B+
63% to less than 66% 80% to less than 84% B
60% to less than 63% 76% to less than 80% B-
56% to less than 60% 73% to less than 76% C+
53% to less than 56% 70% to less than 73% C
50% to less than 53% 67% to less than 70% C-
45% to less than 50% 64% to less than 67% D+
40% to less than 45% 60% to less than 64% D
Less than 40% Less than 60% F

*
A proposal From Prof. Dr. Gamal Hashem
1

You might also like