Ambikagiri Roychoudhury’s view on Nationalism
Doyen of Assamese literature Ambikagiri Roychoudhury was misunderstood by many
of his contemporaries, even accusing him as one of the chief masterminds of the Bongal-
Kheda Andolan in Assam. But, whoever has read some of his major literary works, including
many of his writings in several newspapers, would have to undoubtedly accept the fact that
Roychudhury’s timely warning with respect to the demographic future of Assam and its
potential implications in the socio-political scenario of the state has become far more relevant
now. Had the successive political dispensations in Assam adhered to his warnings, the illegal
infiltration problem of Assam would not have assumed such monstrous dimensions, leading
to the outbreak of the Assam Movement (1979-85) against illegal Bangladeshis. For
Roychoudhury, the ancient land of Pragjyotishpur and Ma Kamakhya, i.e. present-day
Assam, was always an integral part of the larger entity called Bharatvarsha. At the same time,
he had been very much vocal about the protection of the unique Assamese identity, language,
heritage and culture from the point of view of securing the future of the Assamese youth from
outsiders. Almost single-handedly, he kept on fighting for these issues during his lifetime,
while seeking to mould a viable public opinion around them. Roychoudhury deeply felt for
the cause of the Assamese identity, and the culture and civilisation of Assam. He also took
appropriate measures to make people aware of an existential threat that is haunting Assam in
the present times. Hence, any criticism of Roychoudhury as an ‘outsider’, who remained
aloof to the problems of the common people of Assam, needs to be taken with a pinch of salt.
Just like we care for the protection of our own homes and hearth, in much the same way, the
protection of our identity and culture is very close to our hearts. This holds true not just for
the people of Assam, but elsewhere too, which also explains the rise and growth of various
regional political parties in different states of India. As has been mentioned above, in his
efforts to protect the Assamese cultural and civilisational heritage, Roychoudhury’s
imagination always included Assam as an intrinsic and inseparable part of Bharatvarasha
without any conflict. Whether it be in his “Aaji Bondu ki Sondere” or “Deshei Bhogoban”,
his unwavering love for India and Indian history and civilisation, is replete in all of his poems
and texts. Protection of the regional interests of Assam was Roychoudhury’s foremost
priority, without which, he opined, the protection of Bharat’s national interests would never
be possible. They are inseparable and complementary to one another. This is aptly reflected
in many of his prominent essays such as Ahise Jodi Mur Logot Eketa Hoi Mili Jua, Bharatiya
Swaraj Aru Asomiya Swaraj, Jatiyota Aru Mahajatiyota, etc. Roychoudhury never envisaged
the Assamese regional identity as separate or different from the all-encompassing Indian
identity. He clearly wrote in one of his essays that any Indian citizen, residing in any part of
the country, and who seeks to settle down in some other part for purposes of job, education,
etc. must never be denied of his right to stay in that place. For him, it was Bharat and the
essence of Bharatiyata which informed his political views on Assam and its relationship with
India. Roychoudhury always stood for an Akhand Bharat, and this has been explicitly
brought out in the poems that were composed by him during that period when India was
openly at war with both Pakistan and China. Roychoudhury represents the epitome of
Bharatiya culture and civilisation, of which the Assamese civilisational identity constitutes an
inalienable part.
Partha Pratim Mazumder
PO : Kazipara Dist : Nalbari 781341 Phone : 9706630579
Email: [email protected]