Filipino-American writers grapple with whether to exile themselves from their home country, accept a hyphenated American identity, or find a bridge between the two. While they share some experiences with other Asian Americans, the Filipino American experience differs in some ways. Specifically, it involves a longer history of colonialism under the United States and varying attitudes toward assimilating into American culture. Additionally, the pluralism within the Philippines, with its many languages and geographical divisions, makes it difficult for Filipino Americans to have a single sense of national identity.
Filipino-American writers grapple with whether to exile themselves from their home country, accept a hyphenated American identity, or find a bridge between the two. While they share some experiences with other Asian Americans, the Filipino American experience differs in some ways. Specifically, it involves a longer history of colonialism under the United States and varying attitudes toward assimilating into American culture. Additionally, the pluralism within the Philippines, with its many languages and geographical divisions, makes it difficult for Filipino Americans to have a single sense of national identity.
Filipino-American writers grapple with whether to exile themselves from their home country, accept a hyphenated American identity, or find a bridge between the two. While they share some experiences with other Asian Americans, the Filipino American experience differs in some ways. Specifically, it involves a longer history of colonialism under the United States and varying attitudes toward assimilating into American culture. Additionally, the pluralism within the Philippines, with its many languages and geographical divisions, makes it difficult for Filipino Americans to have a single sense of national identity.
Filipino-American writers grapple with whether to exile themselves from their home country, accept a hyphenated American identity, or find a bridge between the two. While they share some experiences with other Asian Americans, the Filipino American experience differs in some ways. Specifically, it involves a longer history of colonialism under the United States and varying attitudes toward assimilating into American culture. Additionally, the pluralism within the Philippines, with its many languages and geographical divisions, makes it difficult for Filipino Americans to have a single sense of national identity.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
A “Different” Asian American Literature
The seeming indecisiveness of agenda for Filipino-American writers (to
exile themselves from the home country, accept the status of a hyphenated American or find a bridge between the two) is not exclusive to this branch of what we term as “Asian American” literature. There are, however, some ways in which the Filipino American experience veers away from the “normal” Asian American lifestyle, and these differences contribute to these writers’ literary intentions. Ephifanio San Juan Jr. claims, in “Filipino Writing in the United States, “that Filipino Americans remain an exploited and disadvantaged, not a ‘model’ minority” (142). Oscar Campomanes, in his arguments that all types of Filipino American writing are “exilic” in some way, counters Bharati Mukherjee’s strict dichotomy of immigration and expatriatism (Lim and Ling 57). The uniqueness of Filipino American writing comes, for critics like Campomanes, from its inability to fit neatly into divisive labels (see Essentialism). What makes Filipino American literary efforts different, even from South Asian American writers, is the combination of the length of the total colonial experience, the involvement of the United States, and the varying degrees of willingness to assimilate into the American cultural landscape. Further complicating the matter is the Filipino appraisal of its own “national” language (Pilipino, stemming from Tagalog) which, according to an entry in the 1995 Encyclopedia Americana written by Leonard Casper, is known as “Filipino English.” The pluralism of national consciousness within the Philippines (eight vernacular languages and three distinct geographical divisions) also precludes an immediate and unified “home” or”national” identify (see Benedict Anderson).