Democracy Is The Best Form of Government

Democracy Is the Best Form of

Government
Churchill said "Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms
that have been tried from time to time." Essentially that democracy has many flaws and
problems but all the others have more problems. Now authoritarian countries such as China
are potentially challenging this assumption by proving that authoritarian regimes are better at
creating economic growth. Is Democracy still the best form of government?

All the Yes points:

1. Freedom
2. Represents the people
3. Better governance due to transparency
4. Respect of Human Rights
5. Promotes Human Rights
All the No points:
1. Economic growth
2. Increasingly about money
3. Electorate is not motivated
Democracy Is the Best Form of Government
Please cast your vote after you've read the arguments.

You can also add to the debate by leaving a comment at the end of the page.
Yes (81%)
No (19%)
81shares
 Facebook
 Twitter
 Pinterest
 Email

Yes because...
Freedom
Democratic states nearly always have freer people than autocratic states. They obviously
have the right to vote for their government so by extension deciding the policy of their nation
and what their nation should be like. They have more freedom of speech and expression than
in autocracies. In particular they are free to criticise their own government.
No because...
Except for the freedom to choose the government there is no reason why people cannot be as
free under an autocracy as in a democracy.

Yes because...
Represents the people

The biggest virtue of Democracy is that it is government by the people for the people. The
government represents the views of the people who elect them and can throw them out if the
government does things that the people do not like. Unlike other forms of government
democracy is about the little man, everyone rather than the elite that are often disconnected
from how everyone else lives their lives.
No because...
Democracy does not do very well at representing the people. In first past the post systems a
government may not even have the support of a majority of those who voted not even
including that many will not have votes and many more will not have the vote. This means
that it is often a small minority of the population who determines which party gets in to
government. Once they are there they are rarely representative of the people as they have
several years to do what they like. Yes they need to think about re-election but that simply
means they need to do more that the people like than the people dislike (or else have a good
advertising campaign).

Yes because...
Better governance due to transparency

Democracy is as much about having checks and balances to the executive and having
transparency of decision-making as it is about elections and the populace throwing
governments out of power. In a democracy the parliament, the media and sometimes the
judiciary all keep an eye on the executive and what is being done with the people’s money.
They are therefore able to see if the executive is doing things that are detrimental to the
country, are immoral, or even illegal. This can then be brought to a halt. Even where such
actions are not visible on the surface there are separate institutions that have the power to
investigate the executive and watch any ‘secret’ deals or actions that are going on away from
public view.
No because...
While this is mostly found in democracy it is not something that has to be exclusive to
democracies. Autocracies can potentially be transparent and have checks and balances they
however often do not simply because an autocracy often has the time, and the willingness to
use force to prevent these from occurring.

Yes because...
Respect of Human Rights

Democracy as much it is understood, is the government of the people, by the people and for
the people.
If democracy is put at it appropriate performance, then, all facet of human rights is respected.
The citizens would have the rights to exercise freedom of speech concerning the well-being
of the populace in areas of the economy, education, health, infrastructural development, etc.
No because...
It is impossible for a state to accommodate all conflicting views on a subject. Thus, majority
rule is practiced.
This puts the rights of minorities into jeopardy.

Yes because...
Promotes Human Rights

As much as Democracy is understood, it is a government of the people, by the people and for
the people. The ability of the people to have a voice in the running of the State, in the
economy, health, education, infrastructural development, etc creates a bit-balanced
environment for governance to thrive; this can only be achieved in a democratic governance.
No because...
No because...
Economic growth
Autocracies are better at big projects, they can get things done and as such they are likely to
be better at creating economic growth if they have the will. In an autocracy there are not the
avenues for dissent that can block building projects, the police or troops can be used to clear
protests that in the west would slow down large infrastructure projects. As a consequence of
this all the infrastructure that is needed to create a modern economy can be produced quicker
and cheaper than would be the case in a democracy. Also the resource base of the country can
be accessed faster (no pesky environmentalists preventing drilling and mining!) and used
more efficiently.
Yes because...
This is not the case. The most developed and richest countries are all democracies. While
they may well have been developing their democracies during their initial industrialisation
democracy and the freedom it brings is increasingly necessary for economic growth once the
country has moved to being mostly dependent upon services rather than manufacturing or
natural resource exploitation for economic growth. Once this occurs then creativity becomes
important and the freedoms associated with democracy are needed to foster this creativity
that is needed for industries such as information technology, creative arts, research and
development etc.

No because...
Increasingly about money

In some countries democracy seems to be increasingly about money. The U.S. is the obvious
example where millions are spent on elections with big events and glitzy advertising
campaigns. This is not what democracy should be about and it discourages other countries
from moving along the path to democracy. Indeed it undermines the very idea of democracy.
Democracy when money is involved to the extent that it is in the U.S.A. becomes elitist and
corporatist because only the elite and rich businessmen can afford to fund the campaigns for
congress let alone for the presidency. The 2008 campaign for the White House cost $1.6
billion and the whole 2008 election including senate and house of representatives races cost
$5.3 billion. Autocracies obviously avoid this immense expense by avoiding elections.
Yes because...

Democracy Is The Best Form of Government

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Democracy Is The Best Form of Government

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Democracy Is The Best Form of Government

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Democracy Is the Best Form of

All the Yes points:

All the No points:

Democracy Is the Best Form of Government

Please cast your vote after you've read the arguments.

Democracy Is the Best Form of Government

Democracy Is the Best Form of Government

Represents the people

Democracy Is the Best Form of Government

Better governance due to transparency

Democracy Is the Best Form of Government

Respect of Human Rights

Democracy Is the Best Form of Government

Promotes Human Rights

Democracy Is the Best Form of Government

Increasingly about money

You might also like