Research and Practucal Research: Research Methodology AMET University
Research and Practucal Research: Research Methodology AMET University
research
Research Methodology
AMET University
16 pag.
Jeovanny A. Marticion
Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: No copyright shall subsist in any work of
the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency or office
wherein the work is created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit. Such
agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the payment of royalties.
Borrowed materials (i.e., songs, stories, poems, pictures, photos, brand names,
trademarks, etc.) included in this module are owned by their respective copyright holders. Every
effort has been exerted to locate and seek permission to use these materials from their
respective copyright owners. The publisher and authors do not represent nor claim ownership
over them.
This module will help you understand the nature of quantitative research.
This will answer your preliminary questions i.e. how do we gather data through this
approach, it is this similar or different with qualitative research you took in Grade
11, how do we deal respondents, what kind of data are we dealing with and how do
we analyze the gathered data. In learning the nature of this approach, it will also
help you understand its role in our society and how it has become the commonly
used approach in research undertakings. The module includes a sample
quantitative research conducted by student researchers. This will give you a
glimpse of arrangement of its components, gathering and analysis of data, and how
key findings are presented. Furthermore, the module aligns with your field of
interest.
What I Know
Choose the letter of the best answer. Write the chosen letter on a separate sheet of
paper.
1. A systematic process of collecting and logically analyzing information for some
purposes
a.inquiry b.research c.verification d.observation
5. In gathering and analysis of data for Quantitative Research it involves the use of
this methods.
a.numerical b.statistical c.scientific d.computer-based
Lesson
Nature of Quantitative
1 Research
What’s In
The use of quantitative research has greatly influenced the society in various
fields. It has brought the humanity into greater heights of relevant discoveries of
explaining natural phenomena, describing population and innovating products. It
helped scientists, field experts and organizations in providing solutions to certain
problems in our community. Throughout time, it has become the backbone of the
world’s activities in business, industry, health, human affairs, infrastructure, space
exploration etc. Previously, you have acquired basic concepts of qualitative
research and, probably, engaged in understanding social issues through qualitative
methods. This time, you will be introduced to quantitative research.
What’s New
What is It
What’s More
Qualitative Research
Tolentino, K. (2019). ‘Look What You Made Me Do’: A Study on the
Individualized Fan Culture of Filipino Taylor Swift Fans, Unpublished
Undergraduate Thesis, University of the Philippines Diliman
The investigation recognizes the intensity of media and its commitment to the
advancement of a person. This incorporates how fans don't rehearse fan culture
just as a type of diversion, but instead permitting an outside power to make an
effect in their lives. Specifically, this examination shows how a universal craftsman,
Taylor Swift, had the option to connect with our nation, adding to the unmistakable
fan culture in the Philippines. In a few top to bottom meetings with Filipino Taylor
Swift fans, the examination uncovers how the hole between unfamiliar media and
fans are crossed over through the association shaped through media utilization.
Considering this, the exploration saw the individual existences of individual
Filipino Taylor Swift fans as they had the option to create confidence, character,
and strengthening, through the ceaseless utilization of Taylor Swift's substance.
Keywords: fan culture, identity, music, self-esteem and Taylor Swift
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quantitative Research
Lim, J. S., Alonso, D. E., Dingal, M. J. L., and Sandueta, R. (2019). Anger,
Impulsivity and Anxiety from Academic Stress as Suicidal Risk Predictors,
Unpublished Research Journal. Science, Technology, Engineering and
Mathematics. Zamboanga del Norte National High School
The study aims to assess anger, impulsivity and anxiety from academic stress as
suicidal risk predictors in Senior High School students. Researchers employed
correlational (prediction studies) design with a sample size of 274 respondents. The
4-point Likert scale questionnaires adapted were State-Trait Anger Expression
Inventory- 2 (STAXI-2), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) and Beck Anxiety
Inventory (BAI) in measuring the level of anger, impulsivity and anxiety from
academic stress. Using 7-point Likertscale, Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ)
was also used to measure the level of suicidal risk.
Higher level of anxiety (x ̅=2.64) and anger (x ̅=2.54) was found among the
respondents. Impulsivity was found to be low (x ̅=2.25). Results revealed that both
anger (r=0.297) and anxiety (r=0.296) has weak correlation to suicidal while
impulsivity shows a very weak correlation (r=0.196). Although significant
relationship was found between anger, impulsivity and anxiety from academic
stress and suicidal risk, respondents are unlikely to commit suicide as shown by
its mean (x ̅=2.46). Ultimately, it can be concluded that both anger and anxiety can
be predictors of suicidal risk. The researchers recommend that people playing vital
roles in the lives of students be active in implementing ways to help them control
their emotions.
Keywords: anger, impulsivity, anxiety, academic stress, suicidal risk predictors
Fill in the blanks. Write your answers on the provide activity sheet.
Quantitative research deals with (1)______________ data. The respondents
are (2)_________________ selected. The approach could either be
(3)__________________ or (4)_____________________. The findings can be (5)
__________________ into certain population due to its nature. Data is collected
through (6) _______________________. The analysis of data is conducted through the
use of (7)______________________.
What I Can Do
Create a concept map on quantitative research. Write your answers on the provide
activity sheet.
Quantitative
Research
Assessment
Multiple Choice. Choose the letter of the best answer. Write the chosen letter on a
separate sheet of paper.
Additional Activities
Read the sample research journal. The journal will be the references for most of the
activities in your learning modules. You may keep this as one of your future
resources for this subject.
Introduction
Students experience different kinds of emotion in their everyday academic endeavor
which lead to expression of various behaviors. An individual’s reaction to a certain event in
his/ her life gives rise for emotions. Dr. Martin Seligman says that people have the ability to
control their own emotions based on how they perceive or interpret their experiences however,
there are instances where some children and adults fail to manage negative emotions and they
express these out through anger, impulsivity and anxiety leading to depression (Lawson, 2002).
Alarmingly, in worst cases, depression can lead to suicide (World Health Organization, 2009).
Every year, 800,000 people die due to suicide and for every suicide, there are even more
people who attempt to do it. Suicide is the second leading cause to the death of 15-29 year old
individuals and 79% of suicide occurs in low to mid income countries. This is an alarming rate
and if not prevented, it might increase from 1 person dying for every 40 seconds to 1 dying
every 20 seconds by 2020. (World Health Organization, 2009). According to the data from 2015
from the Global Burden of Disease Study, suicide rates in the Philippines are up to 3.8 for both
sexes for every 100,000 of the general population (Coronel, 2019). By any measure, there must
be a way of understanding and assessing suicide.
Studies that were recently conducted showed that adults who have suicidal thoughts
show higher means of anger, impulsivity and academic stress than those without suicidal
thoughts (Masoo & Kamran, 2018) and Nepon et al. (2010) stated that there were 5 causes of
suicide namely: loneliness, depression, hopelessness, anger and conflict, however some studies
state that anxiety is independently associated with suicide attempts(18) and that academically
achieving students have higher suicidal ideas than those of academically failing students
(Arun, Garg & Chavan, 2017). Mostly, studies about suicide ideation that were conducted
focused only on university students. Also, most, if not all were conducted on international
countries. With this, the researchers came up with a study that is focusing on the assessment
of the level of anger, impulsivity, and anxiety from academic stress and its use as suicidal
predictors on senior high school students, whether academic achievers or not, that will be
conducted in the locality.
The findings of this study is most beneficial to students since they are able to monitor
their own behavior and emotions and determine if they are prone to suicide so they can seek
for professional help before it turns severe. Also, other beneficiaries include the parents and
teachers since they are knowledgeable about their son’s, daughter’s/ student’s emotional
conflicts and they will be able to find ways to cater their needs. The school administration is
more mindful of their students’ mental and emotional health as these are matters that should
pose serious concern to the society and the batches to come.
This study is anchored to the Stress- Diathesis Model which focuses on behavior
categories, risk factors and their interactions (Heeringen, 2012). This model intends to
emphasize that there is a vulnerability called diathesis among individuals which predisposes
them to develop suicide ideation when encountered with stress. Conceptually, diathesis is the
vulnerability which makes a disordered state to occur. Also, it is the factor that increases the
tendency of an individual to succumb into a particular attitude or act in a different way. The
model asserts that if the interaction between predisposition and stressor go beyond the
individual’s ability to control and maintain it, he/ she will develop a disorder (Lazarus, 1993).
The schematic diagram of the present study is shown below.
Impulsivity
Academic Suicidal
Stress Risk
Anxiety
Methods
The study employed descriptive- correlational (prediction studies) research design since
the study was set to assess if anger, impulsivity and anxiety could be predictors for suicidal
risk. The students in senior high school level of Zamboanga del Norte National High School,
Turno Campus (ZNNHS- TC) enrolled for the school year 2019- 2020 were the target population
of the study. The sample size was 274, 156 students for grade 11 (STEM: 47; ABM: 28;
HUMSS: 53; GAS: 17 and A&D: 11) and 118 for grade 12 (STEM: 32; ABM: 41; HUMSS: 22;
GAS: 14 and A&D: 9). No specific criteria was followed within the process of utilizing the
participants, as long as they were able enroll themselves to senior high school of S.Y 2019-
2020 of ZNNHS- TC, they were qualified to take part in the study.
The researchers prepared a questionnaire which consists of questions from previously
validated data collection tools which was revised to concern with evaluating the levels of anger,
impulsivity, anxiety and suicidal risk from academic stress. These were the State- Trait Anger
Expression Inventory- 2 (STAXI-2),a 57-item inventory which was developed to evaluate state
anger, trait anger and anger expression (Spielberger, 1999) the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale
(BIS-11), a 30- item questionnaire formulated to measure personality/behavioral construct of
impulsiveness (Stanford et al., 2009), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), a 21- item
questionnaire meant to determine the presence of anxiety or depression (Lawson, 2002) and the
Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ), a 15- item questionnaire that assesses the frequency of
suicidal ideation to provide initial information on an adolescent’s thoughts about suicide. The
researchers modified the questionnaires and only selected certain items from the actual and
original tools. Those which did not seem significant to the population and hard to understand
(Ibrahim et al., 2017) not included to ensure that the respondents were able to decode the
meaning of each statement in the questionnaire. For each variable, anger, impulsivity and
anxiety, 10 questions were compiled. All were in a 4-point Likert scale. A score of 1
corresponds to Never, 2 for Occasionally, 3 for Often, and 4 for Always. On the other hand, the
original SIQ consisting of 15 questions was employed in a 7-point Likert Scale where 1
corresponds to Never (NR), 2 I had this thought before but not in the past month (NPM), 3 for
once a month (OM), 4 for couple of times a month (CM) 5 for once a week (OW), 6 for couple of
time a week (CW) and 7 for almost everyday (AE).
Cronbach’s alpha coefficient formula was used to evaluate the internal consistency of
the questionnaire. With the use of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software,
calculated alpha coefficient for the questionnaire exhibited excellent reliability of 0.953.
A rating scale was also used by the researchers in describing the level of anger,
impulsivity, anxiety and suicidal ideation of the students towards academic stress. In
describing the level of anger, 1.00 – 1.75 infers Very Low Level of Anger (VLLA), 1.76 – 2.5
infers Low Level of Anger (LLA), 2.51 – 3.25 infers High Level of Anger (HLA) and 3.26 – 4.00
infers Very High Level of Anger (VHLA). For the impulsivity, 1.00 – 1.75 implies Very Low
Impulsivity (VLI), 1.76 – 2.5 implies Low Impulsivity (LI), 2.51 – 3.25 implies High Impulsivity
(HI) and 3.26 – 4.00 implies Very High Impulsivity (VHI). For the anxiety, 1.00 – 1.75 indicates
Very Low Anxiety (VLA), 1.76 – 2.5 indicates Low Anxiety (LA), 2.51 – 3.25 indicates High
Anxiety (HA) and 3.26 – 4.00 indicates Very High Anxiety (VHA). In describing the level of
suicidal risk, 1.00 – 1.85 means Extremely Unlikely to commit suicide (EUCS), 1.86 – 2.70
means More Unlikely to commit suicide (MUCS), 2.71 – 3.65 means Unlikely to commit suicide
(UCS), 3.66 – 4.50 means Neutral (N), 4.51 – 5.35 means Likely to have suicide (LCS), 5.36 –
6.20 means More Likely to commit suicide (MLCS) and 6.21 – 7.00 means Extremely Likely to
commit suicide (ELCS). The first Statement Of the Problem was analyzed though frequency
count since this was concerned with the demographic profile of the respondents, mean for
Statement Of the Problem 2 to interpret the levels of anger, impulsivity and anxiety, Pearson
product- moment Correlation for Statement Of the Problem 3 to determine the correlation of
the negative behaviors to suicidal risk and multiple linear regression analysis for Statement Of
the Problem 4 to determine which among the three dependent variables can be predictors of
suicidal risk. The data gathered was analyzed through MS (Microsoft) Excel and SPSS.
Students’ Level of Anger, Impulsivity, Anxiety and Suicidal Risk from Academic Stress
analyzed according to their demographic profile
As seen on the graph, females tend to have higher levels of anger, anxiety and suicidal
ideation. This is in consonance with the study on Agression in Women which states that
women have higher anger levels than men (Denson, 2018). However, male displayed higher
levels of impulsivity. The result is consistent with the findings of Weafer (2014) where men are
more impulsive than women. The results are comparable with the study of Ibrahim et.,al which
states that women have higher suicidal risk than men. Grade 12 showed higher levels across
four areas. The subjects for Grade 12 semesters are now focused on specializations,
community immersion and research. The results confirmed the findings of Suoza et al. (2009),
wherein higher level of suicidal ideation was seen among students who have spent more than 8
years of studying at 16.7%.
Younger students showed higher levels of impulsivity and suicidal risks. In a sample of
Finnish students aged 13–17, self-reported depression severity was associated with
concentration difficulties, and poorer social relationships, self-learning, poorer academic
performance, and worse reading and writing outcomes (Fröjd et al., 2008).
Across various strands, they share the same levels of negative feelings from academic
stress except for Arts and Design which has shown significantly lowest when compared to
others. This could be attributed to the nature of their specialization. Most of the subjects
covered are inclined with expression and creativity. The findings is consistent with the study of
Hallaert (2018), where majors were not at a greater risk for suicide than their general peers .
The table above shows that both anger and anxiety exhibits a weak correlation to
suicidal risk. Meanwhile, impulsivity has very weak correlation to suicidal risk. On the other
hand, its corresponding p- values are 0.297, 0.196 and 0.296 which are all greater than the
perceived level of significance, 0.05. Hence, there is enough evidence to reject null hypothesis.
The findings above can be supported by previously conducted studies which state that anger,
impulsivity and perceived academic stress has a positive significant relationship to suicidal risk
(Hawkins et a., 2013; Masood & Kamran, 2018)
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis on Anger, Impulsivity and Anxiety to Suicidal Risk
Model Adjusted R Coefficients (ẞ) Sig.
Square USTD STD
1 (constant) 0.085 0.485 0.220
Anger 0.777 0.297 0.000
2 (constant) 0.104 0.150 0.715
Anger 0.490 0.187 0.009
Anxiety 0.404 0.186 0.009
3 (excluded variable) - - -
Impulsivity - 0.080 0.197
a. Predictors: (Constant), Anger
b. Predictors: (Constant), Anger, Anxiety
c. Excluded Variable: Impulsivity
d. Dependent Variable: Suicidal Risk
The first model showed an adjusted R square value of 0.085. This implies that 8.5% of
the independent variable is explained by the dependent variable. Anger exhibits a statistically
significant relationship with suicidal risk with a p- value of 0.000. The unstandardized ẞ
coefficient for model 1 of 0.777 means that, mean wise, for every one unit raise in anger,
suicidal risk increases by 0.777 and its standardized ẞ coefficient of 0.297 means that for
every one unit raise, standard deviation wise, suicidal risk increases by 0.297.
Second model considered both anger and anxiety. With an adjusted R square value of
0.104, 10.4% of both these dependent variables explain suicidal risk with both of their p-
values at 0.009. It showed a statistically significant relationship with suicidal risk. The unit
raise in the mean of anger, suicidal risk increases by 0.490 while for anxiety it increases by
0.404 (ẞustd= 0.490, 0.404) and for every unit raise in the standard deviation of anger and
anxiety, suicidal risk increases by 0.187 and 0.186 respectively (ẞstd= 0.187,0.186).
Meanwhile, impulsivity was excluded in the analysis with a p- value of 0.197. This
means that it exhibits no statistically significant relationship with suicidal risk.
Ultimately, statistical analysis of the data shows that both anger and anxiety can be
predictors of suicidal risk while impulsivity cannot. These findings are comparable with the
study of Ibrahim et., al (2017) which stated that anger is associated with suicidal ideation and
behavior through perceived burdensomeness and with greater acquired capability for suicide
via experiences with painful and provocative events. The researchers also emphasized that
treatment for problematic anger may be beneficial to decrease risk for suicide. American
Association of Suicidology and American Foundation for Suicide also claims that anxious
people are especially at risk for suicide (Bentley & Nock, 2017; Bentley, 2016). Meanwhile,
other studies have also claimed that impulsivity is not a cause for suicidal behavior (Klonsky &
May, 2015).
References
[1]Arun, P., Garg, R., & Chavan, B. S. (2017). Stress and suicidal ideation among adolescents having academic difficulty. Industrial
Psychiatry Journal, 26(1), 64-70. doi:10.4103/ipj.ipj_5_17
[2]Bahrami, F., & Yousefi, N. (2011). Females are more anxious than males: a metacognitive perspective. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci,
5(2), 83-90. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24644451
[3]Beck Anxiety Inventory. (n.d.). Retrieved from Great Plains Health Behavioral Health:
https://www.gphealth.org/media/1087/anxiety.pdf
[4]Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1998). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 893-897. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893
[5]Bentley, K. J. (2016). Anxiety and its disorders as risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Clinical
psychology review, 43, 30–46. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.11.008
[6]Bilgel, N., & Bayram, N. (2014). The Epidemiology of Depression, Anxiety, Stress and Anger in Turkish High School Students. British
Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 4(9), 1153-1170. doi:10.9734/BJESBS/2014/8733
[7]Coronel, R. (2019, February 26). Culture: There’s something wrong with the way Filipinos talk about suicide. Retrieved from CNN
Philippines: https://cnnphilippines.com/life/culture/2019/02/26/suicide-discourse.html
[8]Denson, T. F. (2018). Aggression in Women: Behavior, Brain and Hormones. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 12, 81.
doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00081
[9]Hawkins, K., Hames, J., Riberio, J., Silva, C., Joiner, T., & Cougle, J. (2013). An examination of the relationship between anger and
suicide risk theory through the lens of the interpersonal theory of suicide. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 50, 59-65.
doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.12.005
[10]Heeringen, K. v. (2012). Stress–Diathesis Model of Suicidal Behavior. In B. Raton, & D. Y (Ed.), The Neurobiological Basis of Suicide.
Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK107203/
[11]Ibrahim, N., Amit, N., Che Din, N., & Ong, H. C. (2017). Gender differences and psychological factors associated with suicidal
ideation among youth in Malaysia. Psychology research and behavior management, 10, 129-135. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S125176
[12] Klonsky D., May, A. (2015). Impulsivity and Suicide Risk: Review and Clinical Implications. Psychiatric Times, 3. Retrieved from
https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/special-reports/impulsivity-and-suicide-risk-review-and-clinical-implications/page/0/2
[13]Klonsky, D., May, A., & Saffer, B. (2016, January 11). Suicide, Suicide Attempts, and Suicidal Ideation. Annual Review of Clinical
Psychology, 12(1), 307-332. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093204
[14]Lawson, C. (2002, January 1). The Connections Between Emotions And Learning. Retrieved July 26, 2019, from Center for
Development and Learning: https://www.cdl.org/articles/the-connections-between-emotions-and-learning/
[15]Lazarus, R. (1993). "From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks". Annual Review of Psychology, 44 (1):
1–21.
[16]Masood, A., & Kamran, F. (2018). Anger, Impulsivity, Academic Stress and Suicidal Risk in suicide Ideators and Normal Cohorts.
Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28(2), 20-37. Retrieved June 2019, from http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/doap/PDF-
FILES/02_v28_2_18.pdf
[17]Mental and Emotional Impact of Stress. (2019). Retrieved from MentalHelp.net: https://www.mentalhelp.net/stress/emotional-
impact/
[18]Nepon, J., Belik, S. L., Bolton, J., & Sareen, J. (2010, September 27). The Relationship Between Anxiety Disorders and Suicide
Attempts: Findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. National Center for
Biotechnology Information, 27(9), 791-798. doi:10.1002/da.20674
[19]Remes, O. (2016, June 10). Women are far more anxious than men – here’s the science. Retrieved from The Converstion:
http://theconversation.com/women-are-far-more-anxious-than-men-heres-the-science-60458
[20]Spielberger, C. D. (1999). State- Trait Anger Expression Inventory SATXI-2. Retrieved from Sigma Assessment Systems Inc.:
https://www.sigmaassessmentsystems.com/assessments/state-trait-anger-expression-inventory-2/
[21]Stanford, M., Mathias, C., Dougherty, D., Lake, S., Anderson, N., & Patton, J. (2009). Fifty years of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale:
An update and review. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 385-395.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.008
[22]Suicide. (2018, August 24). Retrieved from World Health Organization: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide
[23]Thakkar, A. (2018, April 6). Academic Stress in Students. Retrieved from A Medium Corporation [US]: https://medium.com/one-
future/academic-stress-in-students-498c34f064d7
[24]Wanyoike, B. W. (2015). Suicide among Universities in Kenya: Causes, Implications and Interventions. Journal of Language,
Technology and Entrepreneurship in Africa, 6(1), 35-53. Retrieved from
https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jolte/article/view/125003
[25]Weafer, J. d. (2014). Sex differences in impulsive action and impulsive choice. Addictive behaviors, 39(11), 1573–1579.
doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.033
[26] Bentley,K., Nock, M. (2017). Predicting and Preventing Suicide: Where Are We?. Retreived from Anxiety and Depression
Association of America: https://adaa.org/learn-from-us/from-the- experts/blog-posts/consumer/predicting-
and- preventing-suicide-where-are-we
Answer Key
References
Berg, B. L. and Howard, L. “Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences.”
(8th ed). USA: Pearson Educational Inc (2012)..
Bryman, A. “Social Research Methods.” 4th edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2012).
Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. “Research Methods in Education.” (7th ed).
London: Routledge. (2011).
Daniel, E. “The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in
Researching Problem-Solving Ability in Science Education Curriculum.” Journal
of Education and Practice. 7 (15). pp. 91-100. (2016).
Denscombe, M. “The Good Research for Small –Scale Social Research Project.”
Philadelphia: Open University Press. (1998).
Gonzales, C. “COVID-19 cases in PH could reach 40K by June 30 — UP Research
Team”. July 29, 2020. Philippine Daily Inquirer.
Gorard, S. “Quantitative Methods in Educational Research: The role of numbers made
easy.” London: The Tower Building. (2001).
Johnson, B. and Christensen, L. “Educational Research, Qualitative, Quantitative and
Mixed Approach”. (4th ed). California: SAGE Publication. (2012).
Lichtman, M. “Qualitative Research in Education: A User’s Guide.” (3rd ed). USA:
SAGE Publication. (2013).
Lim, J. S., Alonso, D. E., Dingal, M. J. L., and Sandueta, R. “Anger, Impulsivity and
Anxiety from Academic Stress as Suicidal Risk Predictors, Unpublished Research
Journal.” Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. Zamboanga del
Norte National High School. (2019).
May, T. and Williams, M. “Knowing The Social World”. Buckingham: Open University
Press (1998)..
Shank, G. and Brown, L. “Exploring Educational Research Literacy.” New York:
Routledge (2007)..
Tolentino, K. “Look What You Made Me Do’: A Study on the Individualized Fan Culture
of Filipino Taylor Swift Fans” University of the Philippines Diliman (2019).