0% found this document useful (0 votes)
378 views2 pages

Teamwork Self-Reflection Guide

The document provides instructions for an individual analysis report requiring students to reflect on their experience working in a team. Students are asked to: 1) Reflect on the team process, including the team's effectiveness and ineffectiveness, and make recommendations. 2) Reflect on their individual contribution to the team, including their effectiveness and ineffectiveness, and make recommendations for improvement. Students must consider at least 3 organizational behavior theories and demonstrate personal growth, insights, and examples to support their reflections. The paper should be 1,000-2,000 words and follow Chicago formatting style. It will be evaluated based on demonstration of comprehension, thoroughness, insights, and examples.

Uploaded by

Gabriel Auraha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
378 views2 pages

Teamwork Self-Reflection Guide

The document provides instructions for an individual analysis report requiring students to reflect on their experience working in a team. Students are asked to: 1) Reflect on the team process, including the team's effectiveness and ineffectiveness, and make recommendations. 2) Reflect on their individual contribution to the team, including their effectiveness and ineffectiveness, and make recommendations for improvement. Students must consider at least 3 organizational behavior theories and demonstrate personal growth, insights, and examples to support their reflections. The paper should be 1,000-2,000 words and follow Chicago formatting style. It will be evaluated based on demonstration of comprehension, thoroughness, insights, and examples.

Uploaded by

Gabriel Auraha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Individual Analysis Report (Self-Reflection Paper)

Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate your understanding of effective teamwork, your
ability/skill to work effectively in a team, as well as personal growth and learning.

Instructions
• Reflect on your team project experience in this course as follows:

1. The Team Process 2. Your Individual Contribution


(Not individuals working in a group) (to the Team Process, Focus on you!)
• The Team’s Effectiveness • Your Effectiveness in Contributing to the
• The Team’s Ineffectiveness Success of the TEAM
• Recommendations (What the TEAM • Your Ineffectiveness in Contributing to the
should continue, stop and start doing next Success of the TEAM
time) • Recommendations (What YOU can
continue, stop and start doing next time)

• Consider a minimum of 3 of the following topics/theories in your reflection above:


o Perception & Perceptual Errors o Communication & Communication Barriers
o Personality o Power
o Values o Conflict & Negotiation
o Culture & Cultural Dimensions o Team Culture
o Motivation (Self-Efficacy, Goal- o Norms, Roles
Setting, Maslow’s, Expectancy, o Decision-making
Equity Theory, Justice Theory…) o Creativity
o 5 Stage Team Development Model o Leadership

• The self-reflection paper should demonstrate:


o Application of theory to understand your personal experiences
o Examples to support understanding, insights and arguments
o Thoughtful, in-depth reflection
o Evidence of personal growth and learning
o Original ideas, content, thoughts and perspectives based on your own experience

• The parameters include:


o 1,000 to 2000 words in length (this is approximately 2 to 4 pages single-spaced)
(excluding title page and bibliography)
o Chicago-style citations, if applicable
o Professional formatting, including headings, title page and bibliography, if applicable
o Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation
o Marks will be deducted for unprofessional language and formatting, as well as grammar,
spelling and punctuation errors

• Evaluation criteria: See rubrics on the following page for detailed breakdown.

1
OB Teamwork Self-reflection Paper Rubrics
Pts Criteria
Comprehensive and in-depth reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; reflection
demonstrates meaningful insight and growth from team project experience; all key points are thoughtfully
10
and thoroughly addressed; reflections are profound, and are fully supported with clear, detailed and
meaningful examples as applicable.
Thorough and in-depth reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; reflection
9 demonstrates meaningful insight and growth from team project experience; all key points are fully
addressed; reflections are insightful and well supported with clear, meaningful examples as applicable.
Thorough reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; reflection demonstrates valuable
8 insight and growth from team project experience; all key points are addressed; reflections are meaningful
and supported with clear, detailed examples as applicable.
Appropriate reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; reflection shows some insight
7 and learning from team project experience; all key points are addressed; reflections are supported with
clear, detailed examples as applicable.
General reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; some insight and growth from
6 team project experience may be demonstrated; key points are addressed but all may not be fully
developed; reflections are supported with examples as applicable.
Very basic reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; minimal demonstration of
5 growth and learning; key points are addressed but some may be superficially or minimally analyzed; some
reflections are supported with examples but others are not.
Inadequate reflection on and personalization of OB theories, concepts; minimal or no growth from team
project experience demonstrated; not all key points are considered; viewpoints and interpretations may be
4
unsupported or supported with flawed arguments; examples, when applicable, may not be provided or are
irrelevant to the assignment.
Minimal reflection on and personalization of OB theories and concepts; no demonstrated learning from
team project experience; key points are missing; viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or
3
supported with flawed arguments; examples, when applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant to the
assignment.
Lack of reflection on or personalization of OB theories and concepts; reflection and insights are missing,
2
inappropriate, and/or unsupported; examples, when applicable, are not provided.
Response demonstrates a lack of understanding of assignment requirements; key points are not
1 discussed; reflection and insights are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported; examples, when
applicable, are not provided
Section 1: The Team Process Score Out of 10

The Team’s Effectiveness, Ineffectiveness, & Recommendations

Section 2: Your Individual Contribution (to the Team Process, Focus on you!)
Your Individual Effectiveness, Ineffectiveness and Recommendations for Contributing to the
Success of the TEAM

Total Score 20 Points (Worth 7%)

Note: Unprofessional language and formatting, as well as incorrect English grammar, spelling
and punctuation will result in a point penalty of max. 5 points.

You might also like