Running head: PHILOSOPHY !
Philosophy of Education
Natalie Rose
Paris Junior College
EDUC 1301.440
Dr. Marian Ellis, Instructor
PHILOSOPHY !2
Philosophy of Education
I believe that as a teacher I will decide what the atmosphere of my classroom is. If I am
stressed, my students will react to that. If I am happy and calm, it is more likely that they will
feel safe and loved. I do not mean that I can be perfect. I mean that I will be as consistent as I
possibly can be to put the outside world on hold while children are in my classroom. By caring
for the environment of my room first of all, my remaining academic responsibilities will more
easily be fulfilled.
As an aspiring special education teacher, I fully believe that every child is different. I
know that the diversity in my classroom will often be a challenge, whether that diversity be due
to different cultures, a physical impairment, or mental/emotional trauma. However, that diversity
is never a problem; it is always a gift. I believe that children behave (or misbehave) based on the
quality of the relationships in their lives. Children have a fundamental need to be known and
loved, and if that need is not met, those children will act out. Because I believe that children do
nothing except in response to what is happening inside them, I am able to have patience and
compassion for them. I know that there are no bad kids, just kids who make bad choices.
My curriculum is shaped first by students, and second by standards. I believe that more
important than filling in bubbles is the heart of the child holding the pencil. For that reason, if my
choice is ever between handling the behavior of a child or staying “on schedule” I will abandon
the schedule every time. To me, learning healthy behaviors is not a secondary goal of proper
schooling, but the primary goal of a good education. I want my students to learn to accurately
identify their emotions, as well as express them in a constructive way.
PHILOSOPHY !3
Academically, my philosophy is most readily characterized by perennialism. I will teach
my students traditional subjects, including math, reading, and writing. (By no means are those
three the only subjects I will teach.) I will teach them the hard, long way to do math (without
calculators) because I want them to master the basics before they are taught “tricks”.
Additionally, because reading and writing have been imperative to humanity for thousands of
years, I tend to place a special emphasis on those subjects. I will teach my students to write and
speak traditional, proper English. Because I observe that people who know cursive typically have
neater handwriting, I will teach them cursive, as well.
My students will rarely receive homework from me. When a child is in my classroom, it
is my job to teach them. I refuse to send them home with work to do without me beside them,
available if they struggle. If I cannot accomplish everything I need to with my students while
they are in my class—I view that as me unable to do my job.
That being said, assessments and testing do look different in my classroom. On the rare
occasion that my students take a typical pencil/paper test (because it is necessary that they learn
how to take a test), my tests will not be administered in order for the student to know where they
are in relation to other students. Tests are for me as the teacher to know what I need to review or
re-teach, not for the students to know what they need to “re-learn”.
At my most basic level I am a nurturing teacher who acts largely on instinct. I believe
that teaching special education is what I was created to do, and because of that, my heart quite
naturally knows how to do it, with only a smidgen of intervention from my mind. Give me the
struggling student who cries “too much” or is known throughout the school as the “problem
child”. For them my heart reserves its deepest love and most creative strategies.