Mcqs
Mcqs
Mcqs
ADVERTISEMENTS:
(b) the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir
(c) those states as notified by the Union Government from time to time in the Official Gazette
(d) the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir and the North- Eastern States.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
(a) conditional
(b) unconditional
ADVERTISEMENTS:
ADVERTISEMENTS:
5. Cheque is a
6. The term “a cheque in the electronic form” is defined in the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 – under
7. The term ‘Negotiable instrument’ is defined in the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, under section
(a) 12
(b) 13
(c) 13A
(d) 2(d).
8. The term ‘negotiation’ in section 14 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 refers to
(a) the transfer of a bill of exchange, promissory note or cheque to any person, so as to constitute the person
the holder thereof
(b) the payment by a bank on a negotiable instrument after due verification of the instrument
10.If in an instrument the amount undertaken or ordered to be paid is stated differently in figures and in
words
(b)the amount stated in figure shall be the amount undertaken or ordered to be paid
(c) the amount stated in words shall be the amount undertaken or ordered to be paid
11. Under section 16 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, ‘indorsement in blank’ of an instrument means
(a) where the indorser does not write anything on the instrument
(b) where the indorser signs his name only on the instrument
(c) where the indorser writes the name of the person who is directed to pay
(a) on presentation
(b) on demand
13. A promissory note or bill of exchange which is not expressed to be payable on demand, at sight or on
presentment is at maturity
(a) on the 30th day after the day on which it is expressed to be payable
(b) on the 3rd day after the day on which it is expressed to be payable
(c) on the 5th day after the day on which it is expressed to be payable
(d) on the 4th day after the day on which it is expressed to be payable.
14. If a minor draws, indorses, deliver or negotiates an instrument, such instrument binds
(b) only the minor and not other parties to the instrument
(a) does not include executors or administrator (Rama v. Pravin, AIR 1926 Mad 389)
(b) includes executors or administrator (K. Subbanna v. K. Subbarayudu, AIR 1926 Mad 390)
(c) includes executors but does not include administrators (P. Nayar v. T. Ramanna, AIR 1929 Mad 389)
(d) includes only administrators but does not include executors (P.K. Pati v. Damodar Sahu, AIR 1953 Ori 179).
(b) yes, a drawer can limit or exclude his liability by inserting in the bill an express stipulation to that effect
(c) in certain cases although he can escape from his liability but always he cannot so escape
19. In which of the following case the elementary law is laid down that where there is no acceptance, no
cause of action can have arisen to the payee against the drawee
(d) K.A. Lona v. D.H. Ibrahim, AIR 1981 Ker 816 (DB).
20. A bill is drawn payable to ‘A’ or order. ‘A’ indorses it to ‘B’, the indorsement not containing the words ‘”or
order” or any equivalent words. Can ‘B’ negotiate the instrument?
(a) yes
(b) no
21. Where an indorser of an instrument excludes his liability and afterwards becomes the holder of the
instrument, who are liable to him?
22. Can the legal representative of a deceased person negotiate a promissory note, bill of exchange or
cheque payable to order by delivery only which was indorsed by the deceased but not delivered by him?
(a) yes, the legal representative can negotiate the instrument by delivery only
(b) no, the legal representative can not negotiable an instrument by delivery only. He must re-indorse and
deliver the instrument for negotiating it
(c) an instrument indorsed by a deceased person has no legal validity and is void
23. Can the holder of a negotiable instrument indorsed in blank convert the indorsement into an
indorsement in full?
(a) no, such a conversion is not possible under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Section 49)
(b) yes, the holder can, without signing his own name, and by writing above the indorser’s signature a
direction to pay to any other person as indorsee, convert the indorsement in blank into an indorsement in full
(Section 49)
(c) yes, the holder can by signing his own name and by writing above the indorser’s signature a direction to pay
to any other person as indorsee, convert the indorsement in blank to an indorsement in full (Section 49)
(a) transfers to the indorsee the property in the bill, provided the indorsement must be an indorsement in full
25. When presentment for payment is to be made under section 65 of the Act?
(b) Presentment for payment must be made during the usual hours of business and, if at a banker’s, within
banking hours.
27. The question of the reasonableness of the time for presenting a bill of exchange for payment is a
28. Under section 76(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the engagement to pay must have been
entered into
(b) after maturity (Sivaram v. Jayaram, AIR 1960 Mad 297 (DB)
(c) prior to maturity (Thakur Din v. Oudh Commercial Bank Ltd., AIR 1999 Oudh 16)
29. A note under section 99 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should contain among other things
30. A notice of protest under section 102 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
(a) may be given by the notary public who makes the protest
(b) must always be given by the notary public who makes the protest
32. To whom of the following, payment of the amount due on a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque
must be made in order to discharge the maker or acceptor
33. The provisions of section 87 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, are subject to the provisions of
34. Under section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the onus of proving absence of consideration in
the execution of a negotiable instrument is on the
(c) drawee (R.S. Rajeswara Sethupathi v. Chidambaram Chettiar, AIR 1938 PC 123)
35. Which of the following is not a justified round of dishonouring of cheque by anker?
(a) the cheque is post-dated and presented before the ostensible date
(b) the banker had sufficient funds, but the funds are not properly applicable towards the payment of the
cheque
(c) if the cheque is altered in parts
(c) not always necessary but under certain circumstances mentioned in section 98A of the Act, it is a must
37. Under section 97, of the Negotiable Instruments Act when the party to whom notice of dishonour is
dispatched is dead, but the party despatching the notice is ignorant of his death, the notice is
(a) sufficient
38. If the words “not negotiable” are used with special crossing in a cheque, the cheque is
(b) transferable
40. What is the presumption under section 137 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?
(a) drawer
(b) holder
(c) banker
(d) foreigner.
42. As per section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, every offence punishable under the Act are
(a) compoundable
(b) non-compoundable
(c) cognizable
43. Under the provisions of section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, all offences under the Act
are to be tried by
44. For what term of imprisonment an offender under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can be
punished?
(b) when the Dill is properly presented for acceptance, except where presentment is excused, but the drawee
makes the default in paying it
(c) when the bill is properly presented for payment, except where presentment is excused, but the drawee fails
to accept it
46. The presumption as to the date of a negotiable instrument under section 118 is that, every negotiable
instrument bearing a date was made or drawn
47. In the absence of a contract to the contrary, the liability of the maker or drawer of a foreign negotiable
instrument is regulated in all essential matters
(a) by the law of the place where the instrument is made payable (section 134)
(b) by the law of the place where the instrument is indorsed (section 134)
(c) by the law of the place where the instrument is made (section 134)
48. Chapter XVII was inserted into the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by amendment of the Act in the
year
(a) 1888
(b) 1988
(c) 1998
50. With effect from which date, the term of imprisonment under section 138 was increased to two years
from one year?
(b) includes
52.When a cheque has become invalid because of the expiry of the stipulated period, can it be re-validated
by the drawer by alteration of dates?
(a) yes, the drawer can re-validate the cheque by alteration of dates
(c) although the drawer cannot revalidate the cheque, but the drawee can at his discretion revaliate it
53. For the purpose of attracting the provisions of section 138 of the Negotiable InstrumentsAct, 1881, a
cheque has to be presented to the bank
(b) within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity,
whichever is earlier
55. Who should make a complaint to a court for the purpose of taking cognizance of an offence under
section 138?
(a) the payer or as the case may be, the holder in due course of the cheque
56. A complaint against an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881
(c) must be in writing containing a declaration by the drawee that he consents to such filing of the complaint
(section 142)
57. In the trial of an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the provisions of sections
262 to 265 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
58. Under section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, an endeavour shall be made to conclude the trial
within…………………….. months from the date of filing of the complaint.
(a) 9
(b) 3
(c) 6
(d) 12.
59. Can a ‘notice in writing’ envisaged in section 138(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, be sent by
telegraph?
(c) yes [A.B. Steels v. Krishna Finance, (1996) 86 Comp Cas 295 (Mad)]
60. The provision of section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, that every offence punishable
under this Act shall be compoundable was inserted by the
61. The liability under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is
63. Under the Limitation Act, 1963 the period of limitation for filing a suit by the payee against the drawer of
a bill of exchange which has been dishonoured by non- acceptance is
64. A post-dated cheque remaines only a bill of exchange till the date on its face and only from that date it
becomes a cheque being payable on demand. The statement is-
(a) false [Anil Kumar Sawhney v. Gidshan Rai, (1993) 4 SCC 424]
(b) true [Anil Kumar Sawhneu v. Gidshan Rai, (1993) 4 SCC 424]
(c) true [Jogy David v. K.K. Babu, (1998) 94 CompCas 711 (Ker)]
(d) true [Punna Devi v. John Inpex Pvt. Ltd., (1996) 2 Bank CLR 482],
65. As per the provisions of section 93, when a cheque is dishoroured by non-acceptance or non-payment
the holder
(a) may or may not give notice to the parties whom the holder seeks to make liable thereon
(b) must give notice to the parties whom the holder seeks to make liable
(c) must give notice to the parties whom the holder seeks to make liable, but after noting
66. In which of the following case the Supreme Court held that “the persons who are sought to be made
vicariously liable for a criminal offence under section 141 should be, at the time the offfence was
committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the
company. Every person connected with the company shall not fall within the ambit of the provision”?
(a) National Small Industries Corporation Ltd. v. Harmeet Singh Paintal, (2010) 3 SCC 330
67. The provisions regarding summary procedure relating to suits upon bills of exchange, huttdies and
promissory notes are laid down in
(a) the name of the person for whom the instrument has been protested
(b) the name of the person against whom the instrument has been protested
(c) a notary