This document discusses research on the technique of "covering" in singing. It raises questions about how to interpret limited scientific studies on vocal techniques given differences in tonal ideals across cultures and schools of singing. While some research suggests covering produces a darker vocal quality by lowering the larynx and expanding the pharynx, many voice teachers view these as artificial means and prefer techniques that avoid overly darkening the voice. The document questions whether vowels should have major differences in quality between speech and singing.
This document discusses research on the technique of "covering" in singing. It raises questions about how to interpret limited scientific studies on vocal techniques given differences in tonal ideals across cultures and schools of singing. While some research suggests covering produces a darker vocal quality by lowering the larynx and expanding the pharynx, many voice teachers view these as artificial means and prefer techniques that avoid overly darkening the voice. The document questions whether vowels should have major differences in quality between speech and singing.
Original Title
RICHARD MILLER-The-Structure-of-Singing-171-260_3-3
This document discusses research on the technique of "covering" in singing. It raises questions about how to interpret limited scientific studies on vocal techniques given differences in tonal ideals across cultures and schools of singing. While some research suggests covering produces a darker vocal quality by lowering the larynx and expanding the pharynx, many voice teachers view these as artificial means and prefer techniques that avoid overly darkening the voice. The document questions whether vowels should have major differences in quality between speech and singing.
This document discusses research on the technique of "covering" in singing. It raises questions about how to interpret limited scientific studies on vocal techniques given differences in tonal ideals across cultures and schools of singing. While some research suggests covering produces a darker vocal quality by lowering the larynx and expanding the pharynx, many voice teachers view these as artificial means and prefer techniques that avoid overly darkening the voice. The document questions whether vowels should have major differences in quality between speech and singing.
W hen subglottic pressure and airflow are com m ensurate with
the need for balanced, resonant sounds in the singing voice, som e epiglottic participation in general sphincteral activity m ay uncon sciously take place. (One of the reasons the laryngologist asks patients to sing a falsetto "ee” is th at the epiglottis is positioned p er pendicularly and does not get in the way of an exam ination of the vocal folds as it does in the back vowels. Obviously, "covering,” with its introduction of vowel m odification in the direction of the back vowels, has som e relationship to epiglottic position.) How does one interpret the limited scientific inform ation on "covering”? Are researchers aw are of tonal ideals different from those exhibited by their subjects? Do we approve of the sounds m ade by th e subjects? Do we agree with the aesthetic dem and th at fosters the pedagogy which has produced those results? For exam ple: "The general im pression is that the quality of th e voice is ‘d a rk e r’ in singing, som ew hat as it is w hen a person yaw ns and speaks at the sam e time; voice teachers som etim es describe the effect as covering.” The sam e source (Sundberg, 1977a, p. 84) goes on to say th a t "It is interesting to note that voice teachers ten d to agree th a t the phar ynx should be w idened in singing, and som e of them m ention the sensation of yawning. In o th er words, a low larynx position and an expanded pharynx are considered desirable in singing.” However, the extent of pharyngeal distention and of laryngeal depression varies from school to school. Indeed, it m ay be th a t the prevailing viewpoint am ong teachers of singing is th a t pharyngeal expansion and a relatively low-positioned larynx occu r as a con sequence of p roper inhalation and rem ain during the w ell-m anaged b rea th cycle, and are not induced by conscious localized actions. Stretching the pharynx and forcefully depressing the larynx are con sidered by m any teach ers to be artificial m eans of vocal production, contributing to th at m uch "d ark er” voice of the N ordic schools, a coloration th a t a large segm ent of the singing profession wishes to avoid. One does not question th e research m ethods b u t ra th e r the narrow ness of the field from which subjects m ay have been chosen. S undberg continues: "The low ering of th e larynx, then, explains not only th e singing fo rm an t peak b u t also m ajor differences in the quality of vowels in speech and in singing.” He adds (1977a, p. 88), perhaps in response to auditory experi ences: "The singer does pay a price however, since the darkened vow el sounds deviate considerably from what one hears in ordinary speech.” [Em phasis added] But should vowels have m ajor differences in quality from speech to singing? W hich aesthetics do we follow?
Candice Zhiuyan Luo Vocal Pedagogy Research Paper To Fach or Not To Fach ? - A Discussion On Appropriate Teachings of Fach in Trainings For Female Operatic High Voice March 21st 2020